run_metadata: 42527
This data as json
| rowid | run.accession | experiment.accession | sample.accession | study.accession | bioproject | study.title | study.alias | study.type | study.abstract | study.attributes | study.PMIDs | sample.description | sample.title | sample.alias | sample.centername | sample.attributes | GEOsample.title | GEOsample.dataprocessing | GEOsample.source | GEOsample.treatmentprotocol | GEOsample.extractprotocol | GEOsample.growthprotocol | GEOsample.characteristics | GEOsample.accession | experiment.title | experiment.alias | experiment.library_name | experiment.design_description | experiment.library_construction_protocol | experiment.attributes | experiment.library_strategy | experiment.library_source | experiment.library_selection | experiment.library_layout | experiment.platform | experiment.instrument_model | experiment.spot_descriptor | experiment.study_ref | run.title | run.attributes | run.filename | run.semantic_name | run.total_bases | run.total_spots | run.alias | run.read_lengths | run.base_counts | run.r1_length | run.r2_length | run.r3_length | run.r4_length | run.Acount | run.Ccount | run.Gcount | run.Tcount | run.Ncount | run.experiment | run.pool_member | submission.accession | submission.srasource | submission.bioprojectsource | seqdetective.n_mates | seqdetective.mapping_rate.mate1 | seqdetective.mapping_rate.mate2 | seqdetective.nofeature_rate.mate1 | seqdetective.nofeature_rate.mate2 | seqdetective.sparsity.mate1 | seqdetective.sparsity.mate2 | seqdetective.pos_strand_rate.mate1 | seqdetective.pos_strand_rate.mate2 | seqdetective.readlen.mate1 | seqdetective.readlen.mate2 | seqdetective.judgement.mate1 | seqdetective.judgement.mate2 | seqdetective.judgement.reason | platform_family | instrument_generation | read_bias | selection_class | prep_kit | sc_or_bulk | tech_class | technology | tech_variant | submission.bioprojectsource.country | earliest_date | devstage_curation | devstage_curation_coarse | tissue_curation | tissue_curation_coarse |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 42527 | SRR5687194 | SRX2921959 | SRS2287818 | SRP109268 | PRJNA390613 | Transcripts within Rod Photoreceptors of the Zebrafish Retina | GSE100062 | Transcriptome Analysis | Purpose: The purpose of this study was to identify transcripts of rod photoreceptors of the zebrafish an important animal model for vision science. Methods: Zebrafish rods and non rod retinal cells of the XOPS:eGFP transgenic line were separated by cell dissociation and fluorescence activated cell sorting FACS followed by RNA seq. Validation studies used qPCR and in situ hybridization. Some transcripts were examined in sorted retinal cell populations of larval and juvenile retinas and regenerated adult retinas and in a zebrafish model for rod degeneration. Results: At a false discovery rate of <0.01 597 transcripts were upregulated in rods vs. non rod retinal cells and 1032 were downregulated. 13 324 total transcripts were detected in rods including many not previously known to be expressed by rods. Transcripts enriched in rods from adult retinas were also enriched in rods from larval and juvenile retinas and were also enriched in regenerated rods. Many transcripts enriched in rods were upregulated in retinas of wildtype retinas vs. those of a zebrafish model for rod degeneration. Conclusions: We report the generation of an RNA seq dataset describing the rod transcriptome of the zebrafish which is now available as a resource for further studies of rod photoreceptor biology and comparative transcriptomics. Overall design: 8 samples analyzed: 4 GFP+ FACS sorted rods 4 GFP FACS sorted non rods from retina; the two retinas from each of four fish contributed to each sample. | pubmed:29422031 | GFPneg2 | GSM2670725 | tissue:Zebrafish retinal cells not rods|cell type:non rod retinal cells|genotype/variation:XOPS:eGFP|cell type:GFP ; FACS sorted non rods from retina | GFPneg2 | Quality trimmed with Sickle https://github.com/najoshi/sickle Paired reads were overlapped with FLASH https://ccb.jhu.edu/software/FLASH/ Overlapped reads were against the Danio rerio reference using BWA http://bio bwa.sourceforge.net/ BAMs were sorted using SAMtools http://samtools.sourceforge.net/ Reads were counted by feature using htseq count http://www huber.embl.de/HTSeq/doc/count.html Counts were analyzed and differentially expressed genes were identified with R and edgeR https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/edgeR.html Genome build: Zv9.75 Supplementary files format and content: Read count data from HTSeq; EdgeR analysis results with annotation | Zebrafish retinal cells not rods | Whole retinas were dissociated into cell suspensions by incubating with 0.225% trypsin Fisher ThermoScientific and 0.001% papain Sigma for 10 minutes at 37°C. Dissociation was stopped by the addition of fetal bovine serum 10% v/v final concentration. Suspended cells were pelleted and incubated with DNAseI at room temperature for 15 min. Cells were pelleted and resuspended in 100 µL phosphate buffered pH 6.5 saline PBS and immediately FACS sorted. GFP+ vs. GFP retinal cells were sorted using a FACSAria flow cytometer using the 488 nm laser and FITC fluorescence filter and the 70 µm nozzle. Some cells were collected for fluorescence microscopy or for post sort FACS analysis. For RNA seq or qPCR GFP+ and GFP cells were collected separately in a final volume of 100 µL of the FACS sheath fluid and RNA was immediately extracted. | RNA was extracted from tissue samples using the NucleoSpin® RNA kit Macherey Nagel using the manufacturer’s protocol quantified and quality checked on a Nanodrop spectrophotometer. Both quantity and quality were assessed by using an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer. All samples used for RNA seq had an RNA integrity number RIN > 8.0 and experimental design was such that GFP+ cells or GFP cells derived from the two retinas of a single fish constituted each RNA sample as a biological replicate. At least 5 ng of RNA was available per sample and provided to the University of Idaho’s Institute for Bioinformatics and Evolutionary Studies IBEST Genomics Core for RNA amplification and the generation of cDNA. Quality and quantity of cDNA were verified by Bioanalyzer. All sample preparation was achieved with Ovation® RNA Seq System V2 NuGEN and sequencing performed on an Illumina San Diego CA MiSeq. Four replicates from four different fish were sequenced Fig. 1A. Mapping percentages ranged from 97.0% to 97.4% per sample and sequencing depth ranged from 2 781 516 to 3 480 515 reads per sample. | Zebrafish XOPS:eGFP transgenic line were on a 14:10 light:dark cycle in recirculating monitored system water housed and propagated according to The Zebrafish Book Westerfield. | cell type:non rod retinal cells|genotype/variation:XOPS:eGFP|cell type:GFP ; FACS sorted non rods from retina | GSM2670725 | GSM2670725: GFPneg2; Danio rerio; RNA Seq | GSM2670725 | 1 | RNA was extracted from tissue samples using the NucleoSpin® RNA kit Macherey Nagel using the manufacturer’s protocol quantified and quality checked on a Nanodrop spectrophotometer. Both quantity and quality were assessed by using an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer. All samples used for RNA seq had an RNA integrity number RIN > 8.0 and experimental design was such that GFP+ cells or GFP cells derived from the two retinas of a single fish constituted each RNA sample as a biological replicate. At least 5 ng of RNA was available per sample and provided to the University of Idaho’s Institute for Bioinformatics and Evolutionary Studies IBEST Genomics Core for RNA amplification and the generation of cDNA. Quality and quantity of cDNA were verified by Bioanalyzer. All sample preparation was achieved with Ovation® RNA Seq System V2 NuGEN and sequencing performed on an Illumina San Diego CA MiSeq. Four replicates from four different fish were sequenced Fig. 1A. Mapping percentages ranged from 97.0% to 97.4% per sample and sequencing depth ranged from 2 781 516 to 3 480 515 reads per sample. | GEO Accession:GSM2670725 | RNA-Seq | TRANSCRIPTOMIC | cDNA | PAIRED | ILLUMINA | Illumina MiSeq | SRP109268 | GFPnegaitive2_CAGATC_L001_R1_001.fastq.gz GFPnegaitive2_CAGATC_L001_R2_001.fastq.gz | fastq fastq | 1718976888.0 | 2781516.0 | GSM2670725 r1 | 0:309 1:309 | A:529099301;C:352155163;G:350456178;T:487264195;N:2051 | 309 | 309 | 529099301 | 352155163 | 350456178 | 487264195 | 2051 | SRX2921959 | SRS2287818 | SRA574861 | GEO | Biological Sciences, University of Idaho | 2 | 0.71906 | 0.72599 | 0.20211 | 0.20881 | 0.77761 | 0.79289 | 0.65883 | 0.66469 | 309 | 309 | B | B | biological fallback assumption | illumina | miseq | unknown | cdna_unspecified | unknown | bulk | unknown | unknown | United States | 2017-06-15 | Undetermined | Multi-stage | Eye | Sensory System |