run_metadata: 30081
This data as json
| rowid | run.accession | experiment.accession | sample.accession | study.accession | bioproject | study.title | study.alias | study.type | study.abstract | study.attributes | study.PMIDs | sample.description | sample.title | sample.alias | sample.centername | sample.attributes | GEOsample.title | GEOsample.dataprocessing | GEOsample.source | GEOsample.treatmentprotocol | GEOsample.extractprotocol | GEOsample.growthprotocol | GEOsample.characteristics | GEOsample.accession | experiment.title | experiment.alias | experiment.library_name | experiment.design_description | experiment.library_construction_protocol | experiment.attributes | experiment.library_strategy | experiment.library_source | experiment.library_selection | experiment.library_layout | experiment.platform | experiment.instrument_model | experiment.spot_descriptor | experiment.study_ref | run.title | run.attributes | run.filename | run.semantic_name | run.total_bases | run.total_spots | run.alias | run.read_lengths | run.base_counts | run.r1_length | run.r2_length | run.r3_length | run.r4_length | run.Acount | run.Ccount | run.Gcount | run.Tcount | run.Ncount | run.experiment | run.pool_member | submission.accession | submission.srasource | submission.bioprojectsource | seqdetective.n_mates | seqdetective.mapping_rate.mate1 | seqdetective.mapping_rate.mate2 | seqdetective.nofeature_rate.mate1 | seqdetective.nofeature_rate.mate2 | seqdetective.sparsity.mate1 | seqdetective.sparsity.mate2 | seqdetective.pos_strand_rate.mate1 | seqdetective.pos_strand_rate.mate2 | seqdetective.readlen.mate1 | seqdetective.readlen.mate2 | seqdetective.judgement.mate1 | seqdetective.judgement.mate2 | seqdetective.judgement.reason | platform_family | instrument_generation | read_bias | selection_class | prep_kit | sc_or_bulk | tech_class | technology | tech_variant | submission.bioprojectsource.country | earliest_date | devstage_curation | devstage_curation_coarse | tissue_curation | tissue_curation_coarse |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30081 | SRR27700033 | SRX23366853 | SRS20229169 | SRP485459 | PRJNA1068100 | Motile cilia modulate neuronal and astroglial activity in the zebrafish larval brain | GSE254006 | Transcriptome Analysis | The brain uses a specialized system to transport cerebrospinal fluid CSF consisting of interconnected ventricles lined by motile ciliated ependymal cells. These cells act jointly with CSF secretion and cardiac pressure gradients to regulate CSF dynamics. To date the link between cilia mediated CSF flow and brain function is poorly understood. Using zebrafish larvae as a model system we identify that loss of ciliary motility does not alter progenitor proliferation brain morphology or spontaneous neural activity despite leading to an enlarged telencephalic ventricle. We observe altered neuronal responses to photic stimulations in the optic tectum and hindbrain and brain asymmetry defects in the habenula. Finally we investigate astroglia since they contact CSF and regulate neuronal activity. Our analyses reveal a reduction in astroglial calcium signals during both spontaneous and light evoked activity. Our findings highlight a role of motile cilia in regulating brain physiology through the modulation of neural and astroglial networks. Overall design: To analyze the impact of cilia paralysis on gene expression we performed RNA sequencing analysis of 4 dpf smh mutant and sibling control zebrafish larvae. We extracted total RNA from mutant selected based on their curly tail down phenotype and sibling controls mixture of heterozygous and wild type. RNAsequencing was performed on 4 different clutches. | pubmed:39798091 | Smh control clutch 2 | GSM8031706 | source name:whole larvae|tissue:whole larvae|genotype:mixture wt and +/ |treatment:no treatment|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing | Smh control clutch 2 | The filtering of sequencing data was done using SOAPnuke v1.5.2 using the parameters Parameters l 15 q 0.2 n 0.05 The Hierarchical Indexing for Spliced Alignment of Transcripts software HISAT2 v2.0.4 with parameters: sensitive no discordant no mixed I 1 X 1000 p 8 rna strandness RF was used for mapping RNA seq reads We used Bowtie2 Version:v2.2.5 Parameters: q sensitive dpad 0 gbar 99999999 mp 1 1 np 1 score min L 0 0.1 p 16 k 200 to map the clean reads to the reference gene sequence transcriptome and then RSEM Version:v1.2.8 Parameters: p 8 forward prob 0 paired end to calculate the gene expression level of each sample The count matrix included genes that were selected based on their expression of average count per million of more than 1 across all samples. The resulting matrix was normalized and log transformed using the voom algorithm from the limma package of Bioconductor Assembly: GCF 000002035.6 GRCz11 Supplementary files format and content: excel file containing normalized and log transformed read counts: Normalized read counts smh.xlsx Supplementary files format and content: excel file containing differential expression: smhMUT vs smhCTRL mRNA diff expr CPM1.xlsx | whole larvae | To isolate RNA for sequencing 30 larvae at 4 dpf were collected in a 1.5ml tube and placed on ice. To lyse the samples 500μL trizol was added and the euthanized larvae were homogenized through a 27 gauge needle until the mixture looked uniform. post adding another 500μL trizol the samples were incubated for 5 minutes at room temperature. The larvae were then treated with 200μL chloroform and the tube was rocked for 15secs to mix the contents. The tubes were incubated for 2 minutes at room temperature and then centrifuged for 15 minutes at 12000rpm at a temperature of 4°C. post centrifugation the upper aqueous phase containing RNA was mixed with equal amounts of 100% ethanol and was then loaded onto an RNA spin column Qiagen and centrifuged for 30 seconds at 8000 rpm. The spin column was further incubated with 700μL of RW1 buffer and centrifuged for 30 seconds at 8000 rpm. The spin column tubes were then placed into a new collection tube and further treated to remove any DNA contamination by washing the tubes with 350μL of RW1 buffer followed by Dnase enzyme Qiagen in RDD buffer 10μL Dnase+ 70μL RDD buffer per tube for 45 minutes at room temperature. post incubation 350μL of RW1 buffer was added to the tubes and centrifuged for 15 seconds at 8000rpm. The tubes were then treated with 500μL RPE buffer and centrifuged for 30 seconds. This step was repeated twice and the tubes were then centrifuged for 1 minute at 8000rpm to remove any residual buffer left in the column. For RNA extraction from the column 30μL nuclease free water was added and incubated for 2 minutes. The tubes were then centrifuged for 1 minute at 8000 rpm to elute the RNA. The concentration of the extracted RNA was quantified using Nanodrop and the quality was analyzed by bioanalyzer. The samples were then sequenced by BGI’s DNBSEQTM Technology and bioinformatic analysis was performed by BGI. The filtering of sequencing data was done using SOAPnuke v1.5.2 using the parameters Parameters l 15 q 0.2 n 0.05. The Hierarchical Indexing for Spliced Alignment of Transcripts software HISAT2 v2.0.4 with parameters: sensitive no discordant no mixed I 1 X 1000 p 8 rna strandness RF was used for mapping RNA seq reads. We used Bowtie2 Version:v2.2.5 Parameters: q sensitive dpad 0 gbar 99999999 mp 1 1 np 1 score min L 0 0.1 p 16 k 200 to map the clean reads to the reference gene sequence transcriptome and then RSEM Version:v1.2.8 Parameters: p 8 forward prob 0 paired end to calculate the gene expression level of each sample. The count matrix included genes that were selected based on their expression of average count per million of more than 1 across all samples. The resulting matrix was normalized and log transformed using the voom algorithm from the limma package of Bioconductor Law et al. 2014; Ritchie et al. 2015. standard procedure performed by BGI | tissue:whole larvae|genotype:mixture wt and +/ |treatment:no treatment | GSM8031706 | GSM8031706: Smh control clutch 2; Danio rerio; RNA Seq | GSM8031706 r1 | GSM8031706 | 1 | To isolate RNA for sequencing 30 larvae at 4 dpf were collected in a 1.5ml tube and placed on ice. To lyse the samples 500μL trizol was added and the euthanized larvae were homogenized through a 27 gauge needle until the mixture looked uniform. post adding another 500μL trizol the samples were incubated for 5 minutes at room temperature. The larvae were then treated with 200μL chloroform and the tube was rocked for 15secs to mix the contents. The tubes were incubated for 2 minutes at room temperature and then centrifuged for 15 minutes at 12000rpm at a temperature of 4°C. post centrifugation the upper aqueous phase containing RNA was mixed with equal amounts of 100% ethanol and was then loaded onto an RNA spin column Qiagen and centrifuged for 30 seconds at 8000 rpm. The spin column was further incubated with 700μL of RW1 buffer and centrifuged for 30 seconds at 8000 rpm. The spin column tubes were then placed into a new collection tube and further treated to remove any DNA contamination by washing the tubes with 350μL of RW1 buffer followed by Dnase enzyme Qiagen in RDD buffer 10μL Dnase+ 70μL RDD buffer per tube for 45 minutes at room temperature. post incubation 350μL of RW1 buffer was added to the tubes and centrifuged for 15 seconds at 8000rpm. The tubes were then treated with 500μL RPE buffer and centrifuged for 30 seconds. This step was repeated twice and the tubes were then centrifuged for 1 minute at 8000rpm to remove any residual buffer left in the column. For RNA extraction from the column 30μL nuclease free water was added and incubated for 2 minutes. The tubes were then centrifuged for 1 minute at 8000 rpm to elute the RNA. The concentration of the extracted RNA was quantified using Nanodrop and the quality was analyzed by bioanalyzer. The samples were then sequenced by BGI's DNBSEQTM Technology and bioinformatic analysis was performed by BGI. The filtering of sequencing data was done using SOAPnuke v1.5.2 using the parameters Parameters l 15 q 0.2 n 0.05. The Hierarchical Indexing for Spliced Alignment of Transcripts software HISAT2 v2.0.4 with parameters: sensitive no discordant no mixed I 1 X 1000 p 8 rna strandness RF was used for mapping RNA seq reads. We used Bowtie2 Version:v2.2.5 Parameters: q sensitive dpad 0 gbar 99999999 mp 1 1 np 1 score min L 0 0.1 p 16 k 200 to map the clean reads to the reference gene sequence transcriptome and then RSEM Version:v1.2.8 Parameters: p 8 forward prob 0 paired end to calculate the gene expression level of each sample. The count matrix included genes that were selected based on their expression of average count per million of more than 1 across all samples. The resulting matrix was normalized and log transformed using the voom algorithm from the limma package of Bioconductor Law et al. 2014; Ritchie et al. 2015. standard procedure performed by BGI | RNA-Seq | TRANSCRIPTOMIC | cDNA | PAIRED | BGISEQ | MGISEQ-2000RS | SRP485459 | SmhCTRL2_2.fq.gz SmhCTRL2_1.fq.gz | fastq fastq | 4536576000.0 | 22682880.0 | GSM8031706 r1 | 0:100 1:100 | A:1180961957;C:1074391564;G:1088552770;T:1192669709;N:0 | 100 | 100 | 1180961957 | 1074391564 | 1088552770 | 1192669709 | 0 | SRX23366853 | SRS20229169 | SRA1790727 | NTNU | NTNU | 2 | 0.94324 | 0.95313 | 0.08618 | 0.08685 | 0.66399 | 0.66216 | 0.49362 | 0.49644 | 100 | 100 | B | B | biological fallback assumption | bgi | bgi | unknown | poly_a | unknown | bulk | unknown | unknown | Unknown | 2024-01-23 | Larval | Larval | Whole Organism | All anatomical structures |