rowid,run.accession,experiment.accession,sample.accession,study.accession,bioproject,study.title,study.alias,study.type,study.abstract,study.attributes,study.PMIDs,sample.description,sample.title,sample.alias,sample.centername,sample.attributes,GEOsample.title,GEOsample.dataprocessing,GEOsample.source,GEOsample.treatmentprotocol,GEOsample.extractprotocol,GEOsample.growthprotocol,GEOsample.characteristics,GEOsample.accession,experiment.title,experiment.alias,experiment.library_name,experiment.design_description,experiment.library_construction_protocol,experiment.attributes,experiment.library_strategy,experiment.library_source,experiment.library_selection,experiment.library_layout,experiment.platform,experiment.instrument_model,experiment.spot_descriptor,experiment.study_ref,run.title,run.attributes,run.filename,run.semantic_name,run.total_bases,run.total_spots,run.alias,run.read_lengths,run.base_counts,run.r1_length,run.r2_length,run.r3_length,run.r4_length,run.Acount,run.Ccount,run.Gcount,run.Tcount,run.Ncount,run.experiment,run.pool_member,submission.accession,submission.srasource,submission.bioprojectsource,seqdetective.n_mates,seqdetective.mapping_rate.mate1,seqdetective.mapping_rate.mate2,seqdetective.nofeature_rate.mate1,seqdetective.nofeature_rate.mate2,seqdetective.sparsity.mate1,seqdetective.sparsity.mate2,seqdetective.pos_strand_rate.mate1,seqdetective.pos_strand_rate.mate2,seqdetective.readlen.mate1,seqdetective.readlen.mate2,seqdetective.judgement.mate1,seqdetective.judgement.mate2,seqdetective.judgement.reason,platform_family,instrument_generation,read_bias,selection_class,prep_kit,sc_or_bulk,tech_class,technology,tech_variant,submission.bioprojectsource.country,earliest_date,devstage_curation,devstage_curation_coarse,tissue_curation,tissue_curation_coarse
0,DRR314108,DRX303511,DRS233566,DRP008373,PRJDB12134,Comparison of expression profile between banp mutant and wildtype sibling.,DRP008373,Other,To characterize the physiological function of Banp  the expression profile of banp mutant and wild type sibling was obtained by ATAC sequencing and RNA sequencing. All data were obtained using embryo heads at 48 hpf.,,,,RNA seq of wild type sibling sample3,SAMD00399013,,sample name:rna rw337 48hpf WT rep 3|biological replicate:3,,,,,,,,,Illumina NovaSeq 6000 paired end sequencing of SAMD00399013,DRX303511,1,1,1,,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,PolyA,PAIRED,ILLUMINA,Illumina NovaSeq 6000,<SPOT_DESCRIPTOR><SPOT_DECODE_SPEC><SPOT_LENGTH>151</SPOT_LENGTH><READ_SPEC><READ_INDEX>0</READ_INDEX><READ_CLASS>Application Read</READ_CLASS><READ_TYPE>Forward</READ_TYPE><BASE_COORD>1</BASE_COORD></READ_SPEC><READ_SPEC><READ_INDEX>1</READ_INDEX><READ_CLASS>Application Read</READ_CLASS><READ_TYPE>Reverse</READ_TYPE><BASE_COORD>76</BASE_COORD></READ_SPEC></SPOT_DECODE_SPEC></SPOT_DESCRIPTOR>,DRP008373,Illumina NovaSeq 6000 paired end sequencing of SAMD00399013,,,,23076492885.0,76679376.0,DRR314108,0:150.51 1:150.44,A:6146969533;C:5373690527;G:5458576301;T:6095818756;N:1437768,150,150,,,6146969533,5373690527,5458576301,6095818756,1437768,DRX303511,DRS233566,DRA012572,OIST|Developmental Neurobiology Unit,Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology,2,0.94223,0.94614,0.10721,0.10288,0.68745,0.68621,0.4728,0.47157,151,150,B,B,biological fallback assumption,illumina,novaseq_era,unknown,poly_a,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Japan,2022-04-01,Hatching,Embryo,Undetermined,Embryo Imprecise
1,DRR314107,DRX303510,DRS233565,DRP008373,PRJDB12134,Comparison of expression profile between banp mutant and wildtype sibling.,DRP008373,Other,To characterize the physiological function of Banp  the expression profile of banp mutant and wild type sibling was obtained by ATAC sequencing and RNA sequencing. All data were obtained using embryo heads at 48 hpf.,,,,RNA seq of wild type sibling sample2,SAMD00399012,,sample name:rna rw337 48hpf WT rep 2|biological replicate:2,,,,,,,,,Illumina NovaSeq 6000 paired end sequencing of SAMD00399012,DRX303510,1,1,1,,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,PolyA,PAIRED,ILLUMINA,Illumina NovaSeq 6000,<SPOT_DESCRIPTOR><SPOT_DECODE_SPEC><SPOT_LENGTH>151</SPOT_LENGTH><READ_SPEC><READ_INDEX>0</READ_INDEX><READ_CLASS>Application Read</READ_CLASS><READ_TYPE>Forward</READ_TYPE><BASE_COORD>1</BASE_COORD></READ_SPEC><READ_SPEC><READ_INDEX>1</READ_INDEX><READ_CLASS>Application Read</READ_CLASS><READ_TYPE>Reverse</READ_TYPE><BASE_COORD>76</BASE_COORD></READ_SPEC></SPOT_DECODE_SPEC></SPOT_DESCRIPTOR>,DRP008373,Illumina NovaSeq 6000 paired end sequencing of SAMD00399012,,,,26091623771.0,86694066.0,DRR314107,0:150.51 1:150.45,A:6955374552;C:6050013285;G:6169385096;T:6915281392;N:1569446,150,150,,,6955374552,6050013285,6169385096,6915281392,1569446,DRX303510,DRS233565,DRA012572,OIST|Developmental Neurobiology Unit,Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology,2,0.94028,0.94277,0.11038,0.10462,0.68288,0.68134,0.46992,0.47227,150,150,B,B,biological fallback assumption,illumina,novaseq_era,unknown,poly_a,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Japan,2022-04-01,Hatching,Embryo,Undetermined,Embryo Imprecise
2,DRR314106,DRX303509,DRS233564,DRP008373,PRJDB12134,Comparison of expression profile between banp mutant and wildtype sibling.,DRP008373,Other,To characterize the physiological function of Banp  the expression profile of banp mutant and wild type sibling was obtained by ATAC sequencing and RNA sequencing. All data were obtained using embryo heads at 48 hpf.,,,,RNA seq of wild type sibling sample1,SAMD00399011,,sample name:rna rw337 48hpf WT rep 1|biological replicate:1,,,,,,,,,Illumina NovaSeq 6000 paired end sequencing of SAMD00399011,DRX303509,1,1,1,,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,PolyA,PAIRED,ILLUMINA,Illumina NovaSeq 6000,<SPOT_DESCRIPTOR><SPOT_DECODE_SPEC><SPOT_LENGTH>151</SPOT_LENGTH><READ_SPEC><READ_INDEX>0</READ_INDEX><READ_CLASS>Application Read</READ_CLASS><READ_TYPE>Forward</READ_TYPE><BASE_COORD>1</BASE_COORD></READ_SPEC><READ_SPEC><READ_INDEX>1</READ_INDEX><READ_CLASS>Application Read</READ_CLASS><READ_TYPE>Reverse</READ_TYPE><BASE_COORD>76</BASE_COORD></READ_SPEC></SPOT_DECODE_SPEC></SPOT_DESCRIPTOR>,DRP008373,Illumina NovaSeq 6000 paired end sequencing of SAMD00399011,,,,23833525756.0,79191795.0,DRR314106,0:150.51 1:150.44,A:6324521565;C:5556755459;G:5694025045;T:6256748423;N:1475264,150,150,,,6324521565,5556755459,5694025045,6256748423,1475264,DRX303509,DRS233564,DRA012572,OIST|Developmental Neurobiology Unit,Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology,2,0.94723,0.94975,0.09521,0.09114,0.6776,0.67819,0.46045,0.46153,151,151,B,B,biological fallback assumption,illumina,novaseq_era,unknown,poly_a,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Japan,2022-04-01,Hatching,Embryo,Undetermined,Embryo Imprecise
3,DRR314105,DRX303508,DRS233563,DRP008373,PRJDB12134,Comparison of expression profile between banp mutant and wildtype sibling.,DRP008373,Other,To characterize the physiological function of Banp  the expression profile of banp mutant and wild type sibling was obtained by ATAC sequencing and RNA sequencing. All data were obtained using embryo heads at 48 hpf.,,,,RNA seq of banp mutant sample3,SAMD00399010,,sample name:rna rw337 48hpf Mutant rep 3|biological replicate:3,,,,,,,,,Illumina NovaSeq 6000 paired end sequencing of SAMD00399010,DRX303508,1,1,1,,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,PolyA,PAIRED,ILLUMINA,Illumina NovaSeq 6000,<SPOT_DESCRIPTOR><SPOT_DECODE_SPEC><SPOT_LENGTH>151</SPOT_LENGTH><READ_SPEC><READ_INDEX>0</READ_INDEX><READ_CLASS>Application Read</READ_CLASS><READ_TYPE>Forward</READ_TYPE><BASE_COORD>1</BASE_COORD></READ_SPEC><READ_SPEC><READ_INDEX>1</READ_INDEX><READ_CLASS>Application Read</READ_CLASS><READ_TYPE>Reverse</READ_TYPE><BASE_COORD>76</BASE_COORD></READ_SPEC></SPOT_DECODE_SPEC></SPOT_DESCRIPTOR>,DRP008373,Illumina NovaSeq 6000 paired end sequencing of SAMD00399010,,,,27688386114.0,92009317.0,DRR314105,0:150.49 1:150.44,A:7681451080;C:6071566134;G:6242782106;T:7690830655;N:1756139,150,150,,,7681451080,6071566134,6242782106,7690830655,1756139,DRX303508,DRS233563,DRA012572,OIST|Developmental Neurobiology Unit,Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology,2,0.91038,0.91556,0.17971,0.16967,0.67718,0.67716,0.47042,0.46425,151,151,B,B,biological fallback assumption,illumina,novaseq_era,unknown,poly_a,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Japan,2022-04-01,Hatching,Embryo,Undetermined,Embryo Imprecise
4,DRR314104,DRX303507,DRS233562,DRP008373,PRJDB12134,Comparison of expression profile between banp mutant and wildtype sibling.,DRP008373,Other,To characterize the physiological function of Banp  the expression profile of banp mutant and wild type sibling was obtained by ATAC sequencing and RNA sequencing. All data were obtained using embryo heads at 48 hpf.,,,,RNA seq of banp mutant sample2,SAMD00399009,,sample name:rna rw337 48hpf Mutant rep 2|biological replicate:2,,,,,,,,,Illumina NovaSeq 6000 paired end sequencing of SAMD00399009,DRX303507,1,1,1,,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,PolyA,PAIRED,ILLUMINA,Illumina NovaSeq 6000,<SPOT_DESCRIPTOR><SPOT_DECODE_SPEC><SPOT_LENGTH>151</SPOT_LENGTH><READ_SPEC><READ_INDEX>0</READ_INDEX><READ_CLASS>Application Read</READ_CLASS><READ_TYPE>Forward</READ_TYPE><BASE_COORD>1</BASE_COORD></READ_SPEC><READ_SPEC><READ_INDEX>1</READ_INDEX><READ_CLASS>Application Read</READ_CLASS><READ_TYPE>Reverse</READ_TYPE><BASE_COORD>76</BASE_COORD></READ_SPEC></SPOT_DECODE_SPEC></SPOT_DESCRIPTOR>,DRP008373,Illumina NovaSeq 6000 paired end sequencing of SAMD00399009,,,,22970994572.0,76322352.0,DRR314104,0:150.52 1:150.46,A:6142535654;C:5310453740;G:5430124468;T:6086516676;N:1364034,150,150,,,6142535654,5310453740,5430124468,6086516676,1364034,DRX303507,DRS233562,DRA012572,OIST|Developmental Neurobiology Unit,Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology,2,0.93707,0.94063,0.12175,0.11613,0.67825,0.67649,0.46485,0.46905,147,151,B,B,biological fallback assumption,illumina,novaseq_era,unknown,poly_a,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Japan,2022-04-01,Hatching,Embryo,Undetermined,Embryo Imprecise
5,DRR314103,DRX303506,DRS233561,DRP008373,PRJDB12134,Comparison of expression profile between banp mutant and wildtype sibling.,DRP008373,Other,To characterize the physiological function of Banp  the expression profile of banp mutant and wild type sibling was obtained by ATAC sequencing and RNA sequencing. All data were obtained using embryo heads at 48 hpf.,,,,RNA seq of banp mutant sample1,SAMD00399008,,sample name:rna rw337 48hpf Mutant rep 1|biological replicate:1,,,,,,,,,Illumina NovaSeq 6000 paired end sequencing of SAMD00399008,DRX303506,1,1,1,,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,PolyA,PAIRED,ILLUMINA,Illumina NovaSeq 6000,<SPOT_DESCRIPTOR><SPOT_DECODE_SPEC><SPOT_LENGTH>151</SPOT_LENGTH><READ_SPEC><READ_INDEX>0</READ_INDEX><READ_CLASS>Application Read</READ_CLASS><READ_TYPE>Forward</READ_TYPE><BASE_COORD>1</BASE_COORD></READ_SPEC><READ_SPEC><READ_INDEX>1</READ_INDEX><READ_CLASS>Application Read</READ_CLASS><READ_TYPE>Reverse</READ_TYPE><BASE_COORD>76</BASE_COORD></READ_SPEC></SPOT_DECODE_SPEC></SPOT_DESCRIPTOR>,DRP008373,Illumina NovaSeq 6000 paired end sequencing of SAMD00399008,,,,23637901630.0,78541449.0,DRR314103,0:150.51 1:150.45,A:6359178134;C:5420730443;G:5530700546;T:6325864263;N:1428244,150,150,,,6359178134,5420730443,5530700546,6325864263,1428244,DRX303506,DRS233561,DRA012572,OIST|Developmental Neurobiology Unit,Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology,2,0.9308,0.93545,0.13172,0.12462,0.68219,0.6814,0.46842,0.46984,150,151,B,B,biological fallback assumption,illumina,novaseq_era,unknown,poly_a,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Japan,2022-04-01,Hatching,Embryo,Undetermined,Embryo Imprecise
41,DRR408245,DRX393851,DRS407176,DRP012042,PRJDB14275,Zebrafish EN/ENCDC RNA seq,DRP012042,Transcriptome Analysis,A project to find differential expressed genes between enteric neurons ENs and enteric neural crest derived cells ENCDCs in larval zebrafish gut. We dissected guts of transgenic line  TgSAGFFLF217B; uas:gfp for ENs and Tgsox10:cre; EF1alpha:loxP gfp loxP dsred for ENCDCs  and isolated GFP+ ENs and dsRed+ ENCDCs.  Three duplicates for each of ENs and ENCDCs are prepared. Libraries for NGS are prepared using SMART Seq V4 Ultra Low Input RNA Kit.,,,zebrafish 5 day GFP positive enteric neurons replicate 3,zebrafish EN replicate 3,SAMD00529465,,sample name:zebrafish EN replicate 3|biological replicate:eneteric neurons 3|strain:TgSAGFFLF219B; uas:gfp,,,,,,,,,NextSeq 550 paired end sequencing of SAMD00529465,DRX393851,190326ENvsNC N703 5day;EntericNeuron;rep3,1,1,,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,RANDOM,PAIRED,ILLUMINA,NextSeq 550,<SPOT_DESCRIPTOR><SPOT_DECODE_SPEC><SPOT_LENGTH>160</SPOT_LENGTH><READ_SPEC><READ_INDEX>0</READ_INDEX><READ_CLASS>Application Read</READ_CLASS><READ_TYPE>Forward</READ_TYPE><BASE_COORD>1</BASE_COORD></READ_SPEC><READ_SPEC><READ_INDEX>1</READ_INDEX><READ_CLASS>Application Read</READ_CLASS><READ_TYPE>Reverse</READ_TYPE><BASE_COORD>81</BASE_COORD></READ_SPEC></SPOT_DECODE_SPEC></SPOT_DESCRIPTOR>,DRP012042,NextSeq 550 paired end sequencing of SAMD00529465,,,,3729799291.0,23985772.0,DRR408245,0:77.75 1:77.75,A:978752781;C:879988139;G:903976580;T:962122970;N:4958821,77,77,,,978752781,879988139,903976580,962122970,4958821,DRX393851,DRS407176,DRA014886,"NIBB|NIBB core research facilities, National Institute for Basic Biology",University of Hyogo,,,,,,,,,,,,B,B,biological fallback assumption,illumina,nextseq,unknown,random_priming,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Japan,2024-09-22,Undetermined,Larval,Undetermined,Undetermined
42,DRR408244,DRX393850,DRS407175,DRP012042,PRJDB14275,Zebrafish EN/ENCDC RNA seq,DRP012042,Transcriptome Analysis,A project to find differential expressed genes between enteric neurons ENs and enteric neural crest derived cells ENCDCs in larval zebrafish gut. We dissected guts of transgenic line  TgSAGFFLF217B; uas:gfp for ENs and Tgsox10:cre; EF1alpha:loxP gfp loxP dsred for ENCDCs  and isolated GFP+ ENs and dsRed+ ENCDCs.  Three duplicates for each of ENs and ENCDCs are prepared. Libraries for NGS are prepared using SMART Seq V4 Ultra Low Input RNA Kit.,,,zebrafish 5 day GFP positive enteric neurons replicate 2,zebrafish EN replicate 2,SAMD00529464,,sample name:zebrafish EN replicate 2|biological replicate:eneteric neurons 2|strain:TgSAGFFLF218B; uas:gfp,,,,,,,,,NextSeq 550 paired end sequencing of SAMD00529464,DRX393850,190326ENvsNC N702 5day;EntericNeuron;rep2,1,1,,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,RANDOM,PAIRED,ILLUMINA,NextSeq 550,<SPOT_DESCRIPTOR><SPOT_DECODE_SPEC><SPOT_LENGTH>160</SPOT_LENGTH><READ_SPEC><READ_INDEX>0</READ_INDEX><READ_CLASS>Application Read</READ_CLASS><READ_TYPE>Forward</READ_TYPE><BASE_COORD>1</BASE_COORD></READ_SPEC><READ_SPEC><READ_INDEX>1</READ_INDEX><READ_CLASS>Application Read</READ_CLASS><READ_TYPE>Reverse</READ_TYPE><BASE_COORD>81</BASE_COORD></READ_SPEC></SPOT_DECODE_SPEC></SPOT_DESCRIPTOR>,DRP012042,NextSeq 550 paired end sequencing of SAMD00529464,,,,3315994810.0,21477755.0,DRR408244,0:77.19 1:77.20,A:873970427;C:778042505;G:798459853;T:859611841;N:5910184,77,77,,,873970427,778042505,798459853,859611841,5910184,DRX393850,DRS407175,DRA014886,"NIBB|NIBB core research facilities, National Institute for Basic Biology",University of Hyogo,,,,,,,,,,,,B,B,biological fallback assumption,illumina,nextseq,unknown,random_priming,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Japan,2024-09-22,Undetermined,Larval,Undetermined,Undetermined
43,DRR408243,DRX393849,DRS407174,DRP012042,PRJDB14275,Zebrafish EN/ENCDC RNA seq,DRP012042,Transcriptome Analysis,A project to find differential expressed genes between enteric neurons ENs and enteric neural crest derived cells ENCDCs in larval zebrafish gut. We dissected guts of transgenic line  TgSAGFFLF217B; uas:gfp for ENs and Tgsox10:cre; EF1alpha:loxP gfp loxP dsred for ENCDCs  and isolated GFP+ ENs and dsRed+ ENCDCs.  Three duplicates for each of ENs and ENCDCs are prepared. Libraries for NGS are prepared using SMART Seq V4 Ultra Low Input RNA Kit.,,,zebrafish 5 day GFP positive enteric neurons replicate 1,zebrafish EN replicate 1,SAMD00529463,,sample name:zebrafish EN replicate 1|biological replicate:eneteric neurons 1|strain:TgSAGFFLF217B; uas:gfp,,,,,,,,,NextSeq 550 paired end sequencing of SAMD00529463,DRX393849,190326ENvsNC N701 5day;EntericNeuron;rep1,1,1,,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,RANDOM,PAIRED,ILLUMINA,NextSeq 550,<SPOT_DESCRIPTOR><SPOT_DECODE_SPEC><SPOT_LENGTH>160</SPOT_LENGTH><READ_SPEC><READ_INDEX>0</READ_INDEX><READ_CLASS>Application Read</READ_CLASS><READ_TYPE>Forward</READ_TYPE><BASE_COORD>1</BASE_COORD></READ_SPEC><READ_SPEC><READ_INDEX>1</READ_INDEX><READ_CLASS>Application Read</READ_CLASS><READ_TYPE>Reverse</READ_TYPE><BASE_COORD>81</BASE_COORD></READ_SPEC></SPOT_DECODE_SPEC></SPOT_DESCRIPTOR>,DRP012042,NextSeq 550 paired end sequencing of SAMD00529463,,,,2999501518.0,19455440.0,DRR408243,0:77.08 1:77.09,A:788053541;C:705895776;G:724185148;T:775760738;N:5606315,77,77,,,788053541,705895776,724185148,775760738,5606315,DRX393849,DRS407174,DRA014886,"NIBB|NIBB core research facilities, National Institute for Basic Biology",University of Hyogo,,,,,,,,,,,,B,B,biological fallback assumption,illumina,nextseq,unknown,random_priming,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Japan,2024-09-22,Undetermined,Larval,Undetermined,Undetermined
312,ERR977399,ERX1054382,ERS805483,ERP011343,PRJEB10137,RNAseq from mature ductal cells from nkx6.1:GFP zebrafish lines,"ena-STUDY-GIGA-R, University of Liege-05-08-2015-09:45:38:475-48",Other,Background: In contrast to mammals  the zebrafish has the remarkable capacity to regenerate very efficiently its pancreatic beta cells. Understanding the mechanisms of regeneration in zebrafish and the differences with mammals will be fundamental to discovering molecules able to stimulate the regeneration process in mammals. To identify the pancreatic cells able to give rise to new beta cells in zebrafish  we generated new transgenic lines allowing the tracing of multipotent pancreatic progenitors and endocrine precursors. Results: Using novel bacterial artificial chromosome transgenic nkx6.1 and ascl1b reporter lines  we established that nkx6.1 positive cells give rise to all the pancreatic cell types and ascl1b positive cells give rise to all the endocrine cell types in the zebrafish embryo. These two genes are initially co expressed in the pancreatic primordium and their domains segregate  not as a result of mutual repression  but through the opposite effects of Notch signaling  maintaining nkx6.1 expression while repressing ascl1b in progenitors. In adult zebrafish  nkx6.1 expression persists exclusively in the ductal tree at the tip of which its expression coincides with Notch active signaling in centroacinar/terminal end duct cells. Tracing these cells reveals that they are able to differentiate into other ductal cells and into Insulin expressing cells in normal – non diabetic – animals. This capacity of ductal cells to generate endocrine cells is supported by the detection of ascl1b in the nkx6.1:GFP ductal cell transcriptome. This transcriptome also reveals  besides actors of the Notch and Wnt pathways  several novel markers such as id2a. Finally  we show that beta cell ablation in adult zebrafish triggers proliferation of ductal cells and their differentiation into Insulin  expressing cells. Conclusions: We have shown that  in the zebrafish embryo  nkx6.1+ cells are bona fide multipotent pancreatic progenitors  while ascl1b+ cells represent committed endocrine precursors. In contrast to mouse  pancreatic progenitor markers nkx6.1 and pdx1 continue to be expressed in adult ductal cells  a subset of which we show are still able to proliferate and undergo ductal and endocrine differentiation  providing the first robust evidence of the existence of pancreatic progenitor/stem cells in adult zebrafish. Our findings support the hypothesis that nkx6.1+ pancreatic progenitors contribute to beta cell regeneration. Further characterization of these cells will open up new perspectives for anti diabetic therapies.,,,,Ductal cells R3,SAMEA3498334,"GIGA-R, University of Liege",ENA first public:2015 08 17|ENA last update:2015 08 05|External Id:SAMEA3498334|INSDC center alias:GIGA R  University of Liege|INSDC center name:GIGA R  University of Liege|INSDC first public:2015 08 17T17:01:08Z|INSDC last update:2015 08 05T10:19:01Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:3|cell type:Pancreatic Ductal cells|collected by:Isabelle Manfroid and David Bergeman|common name:zebrafish|dev stage:Adult|isolate:Tgnkx6.1:GPF|lab host:ZDDM|sample name:3|strain:Tgnkx6.1:GPF,,,,,,,,,Illumina HiSeq 2000 paired end sequencing,ena EXPERIMENT GIGA R  University of Liege 05 08 2015 10:18:44:269 3,unspecified,1,nextera XT,,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,Oligo-dT,PAIRED,ILLUMINA,Illumina HiSeq 2000,,ERP011343,Illumina HiSeq 2000 paired end sequencing,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2015 08 17|ENA LAST UPDATE:2018 11 16,NGS14-B703_nkx2_TCCTGAGC_L003_R1_001.fastq.gz NGS14-B703_nkx2_TCCTGAGC_L003_R2_001.fastq.gz,fastq fastq,14253683247.0,70913847.0,ena RUN GIGA R  University of Liege 05 08 2015 10:18:44:269 3,0:101 1:100,A:3767730088;C:2759135663;G:2772107550;T:3905748607;N:1048961339,101,100,,,3767730088,2759135663,2772107550,3905748607,1048961339,ERX1054382,ERS805483,ERA463457,"GIGA-R, University of Liege|European Nucleotide Archive","GIGA-R, University of Liege",2,0.74612,0.7459,0.10937,0.11122,0.81704,0.81913,0.54841,0.53764,101,100,B,B,biological fallback assumption,illumina,hiseq_era,unknown,poly_a,nextera,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Belgium,2015-08-05,Adult,Adult,Undetermined,Undetermined
313,ERR977398,ERX1054381,ERS805482,ERP011343,PRJEB10137,RNAseq from mature ductal cells from nkx6.1:GFP zebrafish lines,"ena-STUDY-GIGA-R, University of Liege-05-08-2015-09:45:38:475-48",Other,Background: In contrast to mammals  the zebrafish has the remarkable capacity to regenerate very efficiently its pancreatic beta cells. Understanding the mechanisms of regeneration in zebrafish and the differences with mammals will be fundamental to discovering molecules able to stimulate the regeneration process in mammals. To identify the pancreatic cells able to give rise to new beta cells in zebrafish  we generated new transgenic lines allowing the tracing of multipotent pancreatic progenitors and endocrine precursors. Results: Using novel bacterial artificial chromosome transgenic nkx6.1 and ascl1b reporter lines  we established that nkx6.1 positive cells give rise to all the pancreatic cell types and ascl1b positive cells give rise to all the endocrine cell types in the zebrafish embryo. These two genes are initially co expressed in the pancreatic primordium and their domains segregate  not as a result of mutual repression  but through the opposite effects of Notch signaling  maintaining nkx6.1 expression while repressing ascl1b in progenitors. In adult zebrafish  nkx6.1 expression persists exclusively in the ductal tree at the tip of which its expression coincides with Notch active signaling in centroacinar/terminal end duct cells. Tracing these cells reveals that they are able to differentiate into other ductal cells and into Insulin expressing cells in normal – non diabetic – animals. This capacity of ductal cells to generate endocrine cells is supported by the detection of ascl1b in the nkx6.1:GFP ductal cell transcriptome. This transcriptome also reveals  besides actors of the Notch and Wnt pathways  several novel markers such as id2a. Finally  we show that beta cell ablation in adult zebrafish triggers proliferation of ductal cells and their differentiation into Insulin  expressing cells. Conclusions: We have shown that  in the zebrafish embryo  nkx6.1+ cells are bona fide multipotent pancreatic progenitors  while ascl1b+ cells represent committed endocrine precursors. In contrast to mouse  pancreatic progenitor markers nkx6.1 and pdx1 continue to be expressed in adult ductal cells  a subset of which we show are still able to proliferate and undergo ductal and endocrine differentiation  providing the first robust evidence of the existence of pancreatic progenitor/stem cells in adult zebrafish. Our findings support the hypothesis that nkx6.1+ pancreatic progenitors contribute to beta cell regeneration. Further characterization of these cells will open up new perspectives for anti diabetic therapies.,,,,Ductal cells R2,SAMEA3498333,"GIGA-R, University of Liege",ENA first public:2015 08 17|ENA last update:2015 08 05|External Id:SAMEA3498333|INSDC center alias:GIGA R  University of Liege|INSDC center name:GIGA R  University of Liege|INSDC first public:2015 08 17T17:01:08Z|INSDC last update:2015 08 05T10:19:01Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:2|cell type:Pancreatic Ductal cells|collected by:Isabelle Manfroid and David Bergeman|common name:zebrafish|dev stage:Adult|isolate:Tgnkx6.1:GPF|lab host:ZDDM|sample name:2|strain:Tgnkx6.1:GPF,,,,,,,,,Illumina HiSeq 2000 paired end sequencing,ena EXPERIMENT GIGA R  University of Liege 05 08 2015 10:18:44:269 2,unspecified,1,Truseq nano DNAsample,,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,Oligo-dT,PAIRED,ILLUMINA,Illumina HiSeq 2000,,ERP011343,Illumina HiSeq 2000 paired end sequencing,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2015 08 17|ENA LAST UPDATE:2018 11 16,NGS14-B424_NKX6-1_3000C_CTTGTA_L005_R2_001.fastq.gz NGS14-B424_NKX6-1_3000C_CTTGTA_L005_R1_001.fastq.gz,fastq fastq,17434323262.0,86308531.0,ena RUN GIGA R  University of Liege 05 08 2015 10:18:44:269 2,0:101 1:101,A:5014046305;C:3245710338;G:3382410145;T:5701198546;N:90957928,101,101,,,5014046305,3245710338,3382410145,5701198546,90957928,ERX1054381,ERS805482,ERA463457,"GIGA-R, University of Liege|European Nucleotide Archive","GIGA-R, University of Liege",2,0.87938,0.83068,0.30659,0.31351,0.80162,0.8438,0.50285,0.47987,101,101,B,B,biological fallback assumption,illumina,hiseq_era,unknown,poly_a,trueseq,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Belgium,2015-08-05,Adult,Adult,Undetermined,Undetermined
314,ERR977397,ERX1054380,ERS805481,ERP011343,PRJEB10137,RNAseq from mature ductal cells from nkx6.1:GFP zebrafish lines,"ena-STUDY-GIGA-R, University of Liege-05-08-2015-09:45:38:475-48",Other,Background: In contrast to mammals  the zebrafish has the remarkable capacity to regenerate very efficiently its pancreatic beta cells. Understanding the mechanisms of regeneration in zebrafish and the differences with mammals will be fundamental to discovering molecules able to stimulate the regeneration process in mammals. To identify the pancreatic cells able to give rise to new beta cells in zebrafish  we generated new transgenic lines allowing the tracing of multipotent pancreatic progenitors and endocrine precursors. Results: Using novel bacterial artificial chromosome transgenic nkx6.1 and ascl1b reporter lines  we established that nkx6.1 positive cells give rise to all the pancreatic cell types and ascl1b positive cells give rise to all the endocrine cell types in the zebrafish embryo. These two genes are initially co expressed in the pancreatic primordium and their domains segregate  not as a result of mutual repression  but through the opposite effects of Notch signaling  maintaining nkx6.1 expression while repressing ascl1b in progenitors. In adult zebrafish  nkx6.1 expression persists exclusively in the ductal tree at the tip of which its expression coincides with Notch active signaling in centroacinar/terminal end duct cells. Tracing these cells reveals that they are able to differentiate into other ductal cells and into Insulin expressing cells in normal – non diabetic – animals. This capacity of ductal cells to generate endocrine cells is supported by the detection of ascl1b in the nkx6.1:GFP ductal cell transcriptome. This transcriptome also reveals  besides actors of the Notch and Wnt pathways  several novel markers such as id2a. Finally  we show that beta cell ablation in adult zebrafish triggers proliferation of ductal cells and their differentiation into Insulin  expressing cells. Conclusions: We have shown that  in the zebrafish embryo  nkx6.1+ cells are bona fide multipotent pancreatic progenitors  while ascl1b+ cells represent committed endocrine precursors. In contrast to mouse  pancreatic progenitor markers nkx6.1 and pdx1 continue to be expressed in adult ductal cells  a subset of which we show are still able to proliferate and undergo ductal and endocrine differentiation  providing the first robust evidence of the existence of pancreatic progenitor/stem cells in adult zebrafish. Our findings support the hypothesis that nkx6.1+ pancreatic progenitors contribute to beta cell regeneration. Further characterization of these cells will open up new perspectives for anti diabetic therapies.,,,,Ductal cells R1,SAMEA3498332,"GIGA-R, University of Liege",ENA first public:2015 08 17|ENA last update:2015 08 05|External Id:SAMEA3498332|INSDC center alias:GIGA R  University of Liege|INSDC center name:GIGA R  University of Liege|INSDC first public:2015 08 17T17:01:08Z|INSDC last update:2015 08 05T10:19:01Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:1|cell type:Pancreatic Ductal cells|collected by:Isabelle Manfroid and David Bergeman|common name:zebrafish|dev stage:Adult|isolate:Tgnkx6.1:GPF|lab host:ZDDM|sample name:1|strain:Tgnkx6.1:GPF,,,,,,,,,Illumina HiSeq 2000 paired end sequencing,ena EXPERIMENT GIGA R  University of Liege 05 08 2015 10:18:44:269 1,unspecified,1,Truseq nano DNA sample,,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,Oligo-dT,PAIRED,ILLUMINA,Illumina HiSeq 2000,,ERP011343,Illumina HiSeq 2000 paired end sequencing,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2015 08 17|ENA LAST UPDATE:2018 11 16,NGS14-B423_NKX6-1_1000C_GCCAAT_L005_R1_001.fastq.gz NGS14-B423_NKX6-1_1000C_GCCAAT_L005_R2_001.fastq.gz,fastq fastq,8147922500.0,40336250.0,ena RUN GIGA R  University of Liege 05 08 2015 10:18:44:269 1,0:101 1:101,A:2422471356;C:1435392327;G:1491979725;T:2755195660;N:42883432,101,101,,,2422471356,1435392327,1491979725,2755195660,42883432,ERX1054380,ERS805481,ERA463457,"GIGA-R, University of Liege|European Nucleotide Archive","GIGA-R, University of Liege",2,0.85302,0.79849,0.41437,0.41711,0.83871,0.87012,0.48354,0.50046,101,101,B,B,biological fallback assumption,illumina,hiseq_era,unknown,poly_a,trueseq,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Belgium,2015-08-05,Adult,Adult,Undetermined,Undetermined
315,ERR1675931,ERX1745976,ERS805781,ERP011346,PRJEB10140,RNAseq from the pancreatic acinar  alpha  beta and delta cells from zebrafish,"ena-STUDY-GIGA-R, University of Liege-05-08-2015-10:47:24:447-55",Other,We took advantage of zebrafish transgenic tools to isolate by FACS the major pancreatic cell types and obtain pure preparations of endocrine a   ß  and d cells as well as exocrine acinar and ductal cells.,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2017 01 31|ENA LAST UPDATE:2017 01 31,,Acinar cells from adults purified by FACS,Acinar cells R2 1,SAMEA3498632,"GIGA-R, University of Liege",ENA first public:2017 01 31|ENA last update:2015 08 05|External Id:SAMEA3498632|INSDC center alias:GIGA R  University of Liege|INSDC center name:GIGA R  University of Liege|INSDC first public:2017 01 31T17:01:11Z|INSDC last update:2015 08 05T16:56:59Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:37|cell type:Pancreatic Acinar cells|collected by:Isabelle Manfroid|common name:zebrafish|dev stage:Adult|isolate:Tgptf1a:GFP|lab host:ZDDM|sample name:37,,,,,,,,,Illumina HiSeq 2000 paired end sequencing,ena EXPERIMENT GIGA R  University of Liege 06 10 2016 15:53:35:325 1,unspecified,1,,,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,Oligo-dT,PAIRED,ILLUMINA,Illumina HiSeq 2000,,ERP011346,Illumina HiSeq 2000 paired end sequencing,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2017 01 31|ENA LAST UPDATE:2018 11 16,A028_tefa_acinar_GTCCGC_L006_R1_001.fastq.gz A028_tefa_acinar_GTCCGC_L006_R2_001.fastq.gz,fastq fastq,10323596830.0,51106915.0,ena RUN GIGA R  University of Liege 06 10 2016 15:53:35:325 1,0:101 1:101,A:2531431314;C:2448656972;G:2434247998;T:2833404838;N:75855708,101,101,,,2531431314,2448656972,2434247998,2833404838,75855708,ERX1745976,ERS805781,ERA727496,"GIGA-R, University of Liege|European Nucleotide Archive","GIGA-R, University of Liege",2,0.86878,0.78451,0.03164,0.02157,0.95077,0.96161,0.52068,0.26664,101,101,B,B,biological fallback assumption,illumina,hiseq_era,unknown,poly_a,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Belgium,2015-08-05,Adult,Adult,Undetermined,Undetermined
316,ERR977594,ERX1054577,ERS805784,ERP011346,PRJEB10140,RNAseq from the pancreatic acinar  alpha  beta and delta cells from zebrafish,"ena-STUDY-GIGA-R, University of Liege-05-08-2015-10:47:24:447-55",Other,We took advantage of zebrafish transgenic tools to isolate by FACS the major pancreatic cell types and obtain pure preparations of endocrine a   ß  and d cells as well as exocrine acinar and ductal cells.,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2017 01 31|ENA LAST UPDATE:2017 01 31,,Acinar cells from adults purified by FACS,Acinar cells R4,SAMEA3498635,"GIGA-R, University of Liege",ENA first public:2017 01 31|ENA last update:2015 08 05|External Id:SAMEA3498635|INSDC center alias:GIGA R  University of Liege|INSDC center name:GIGA R  University of Liege|INSDC first public:2017 01 31T17:01:11Z|INSDC last update:2015 08 05T16:56:59Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:40|cell type:Pancreatic Acinar cells|collected by:Isabelle Manfroid|common name:zebrafish|dev stage:Adult|isolate:Tgptf1a:GFP|lab host:ZDDM|sample name:40,,,,,,,,,Illumina HiSeq 2000 paired end sequencing,ena EXPERIMENT GIGA R  University of Liege 05 08 2015 16:56:42:490 19,Acinar R4,1,Truseq nano DNA Sample prep,,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,Oligo-dT,PAIRED,ILLUMINA,Illumina HiSeq 2000,,ERP011346,Illumina HiSeq 2000 paired end sequencing,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2017 01 31|ENA LAST UPDATE:2018 11 16,NGS14-B702_Acinar4_GTGAAA_L008_R1_001.fastq.gz NGS14-B702_Acinar4_GTGAAA_L008_R2_001.fastq.gz,fastq fastq,16935208936.0,83837668.0,ena RUN GIGA R  University of Liege 05 08 2015 16:56:42:490 19,0:101 1:101,A:4069193994;C:3974803883;G:4029409265;T:4779969672;N:81832122,101,101,,,4069193994,3974803883,4029409265,4779969672,81832122,ERX1054577,ERS805784,ERA463595,"GIGA-R, University of Liege|European Nucleotide Archive","GIGA-R, University of Liege",2,0.93976,0.89939,0.01468,0.01416,0.93801,0.94795,0.50718,0.50041,101,101,B,B,biological fallback assumption,illumina,hiseq_era,unknown,poly_a,trueseq,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Belgium,2015-08-05,Adult,Adult,Undetermined,Undetermined
317,ERR977593,ERX1054576,ERS805783,ERP011346,PRJEB10140,RNAseq from the pancreatic acinar  alpha  beta and delta cells from zebrafish,"ena-STUDY-GIGA-R, University of Liege-05-08-2015-10:47:24:447-55",Other,We took advantage of zebrafish transgenic tools to isolate by FACS the major pancreatic cell types and obtain pure preparations of endocrine a   ß  and d cells as well as exocrine acinar and ductal cells.,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2017 01 31|ENA LAST UPDATE:2017 01 31,,Acinar cells from adults purified by FACS,Acinar cells R3,SAMEA3498634,"GIGA-R, University of Liege",ENA first public:2017 01 31|ENA last update:2015 08 05|External Id:SAMEA3498634|INSDC center alias:GIGA R  University of Liege|INSDC center name:GIGA R  University of Liege|INSDC first public:2017 01 31T17:01:11Z|INSDC last update:2015 08 05T16:56:59Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:39|cell type:Pancreatic Acinar cells|collected by:Isabelle Manfroid|common name:zebrafish|dev stage:Adult|isolate:Tgptf1a:GFP|lab host:ZDDM|sample name:39,,,,,,,,,Illumina HiSeq 2000 paired end sequencing,ena EXPERIMENT GIGA R  University of Liege 05 08 2015 16:56:42:490 18,Acinar R3,1,Truseq nano DNA Sample prep,,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,Oligo-dT,PAIRED,ILLUMINA,Illumina HiSeq 2000,,ERP011346,Illumina HiSeq 2000 paired end sequencing,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2017 01 31|ENA LAST UPDATE:2018 11 16,NGS14-B701_Acinar3_ACAGTG_L008_R1_001.fastq.gz NGS14-B701_Acinar3_ACAGTG_L008_R2_001.fastq.gz,fastq fastq,15710260534.0,77773567.0,ena RUN GIGA R  University of Liege 05 08 2015 16:56:42:490 18,0:101 1:101,A:3788172647;C:3700546898;G:3749520213;T:4395516227;N:76504549,101,101,,,3788172647,3700546898,3749520213,4395516227,76504549,ERX1054576,ERS805783,ERA463595,"GIGA-R, University of Liege|European Nucleotide Archive","GIGA-R, University of Liege",2,0.95517,0.92587,0.0153,0.01529,0.91504,0.92553,0.49096,0.48449,101,101,B,B,biological fallback assumption,illumina,hiseq_era,unknown,poly_a,trueseq,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Belgium,2015-08-05,Adult,Adult,Undetermined,Undetermined
318,ERR977592,ERX1054575,ERS805782,ERP011346,PRJEB10140,RNAseq from the pancreatic acinar  alpha  beta and delta cells from zebrafish,"ena-STUDY-GIGA-R, University of Liege-05-08-2015-10:47:24:447-55",Other,We took advantage of zebrafish transgenic tools to isolate by FACS the major pancreatic cell types and obtain pure preparations of endocrine a   ß  and d cells as well as exocrine acinar and ductal cells.,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2017 01 31|ENA LAST UPDATE:2017 01 31,,Acinar cells from adults purified by FACS,Acinar cells R2 2,SAMEA3498633,"GIGA-R, University of Liege",ENA first public:2017 01 31|ENA last update:2015 08 05|External Id:SAMEA3498633|INSDC center alias:GIGA R  University of Liege|INSDC center name:GIGA R  University of Liege|INSDC first public:2017 01 31T17:01:11Z|INSDC last update:2015 08 05T16:56:59Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:38|cell type:Pancreatic Acinar cells|collected by:Isabelle Manfroid|common name:zebrafish|dev stage:Adult|isolate:Tgptf1a:GFP|lab host:ZDDM|sample name:38,,,,,,,,,Illumina HiSeq 2000 paired end sequencing,ena EXPERIMENT GIGA R  University of Liege 05 08 2015 16:56:42:490 17,Acinar R2 2,1,Truseq DNA Sample prep,,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,Oligo-dT,PAIRED,ILLUMINA,Illumina HiSeq 2000,,ERP011346,Illumina HiSeq 2000 paired end sequencing,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2017 01 31|ENA LAST UPDATE:2018 11 16,Acinar_A028_GTCCGC_L003_R1_001.fastq.gz Acinar_A028_GTCCGC_L003_R2_001.fastq.gz,fastq fastq,3461595220.0,17136610.0,ena RUN GIGA R  University of Liege 05 08 2015 16:56:42:490 17,0:101 1:101,A:847745846;C:824702298;G:830498571;T:958264119;N:384386,101,101,,,847745846,824702298,830498571,958264119,384386,ERX1054575,ERS805782,ERA463595,"GIGA-R, University of Liege|European Nucleotide Archive","GIGA-R, University of Liege",2,0.86246,0.7781,0.03038,0.02178,0.95357,0.96327,0.56719,0.35588,101,101,B,B,biological fallback assumption,illumina,hiseq_era,unknown,poly_a,trueseq,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Belgium,2015-08-05,Adult,Adult,Undetermined,Undetermined
319,ERR977591,ERX1054574,ERS805780,ERP011346,PRJEB10140,RNAseq from the pancreatic acinar  alpha  beta and delta cells from zebrafish,"ena-STUDY-GIGA-R, University of Liege-05-08-2015-10:47:24:447-55",Other,We took advantage of zebrafish transgenic tools to isolate by FACS the major pancreatic cell types and obtain pure preparations of endocrine a   ß  and d cells as well as exocrine acinar and ductal cells.,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2017 01 31|ENA LAST UPDATE:2017 01 31,,Acinar cells from adults purified by FACS,Acinar cells R1 2,SAMEA3498631,"GIGA-R, University of Liege",ENA first public:2017 01 31|ENA last update:2015 08 05|External Id:SAMEA3498631|INSDC center alias:GIGA R  University of Liege|INSDC center name:GIGA R  University of Liege|INSDC first public:2017 01 31T17:01:11Z|INSDC last update:2015 08 05T16:56:59Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:36|cell type:Pancreatic Acinar cells|collected by:Isabelle Manfroid|common name:zebrafish|dev stage:Adult|isolate:Tgptf1a:GFP|lab host:ZDDM|sample name:36,,,,,,,,,Illumina HiSeq 2000 paired end sequencing,ena EXPERIMENT GIGA R  University of Liege 05 08 2015 16:56:42:490 16,Acinar R1 2,1,Truseq DNA Sample prep,,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,Oligo-dT,PAIRED,ILLUMINA,Illumina HiSeq 2000,,ERP011346,Illumina HiSeq 2000 paired end sequencing,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2017 01 31|ENA LAST UPDATE:2018 11 16,Exocrine_GTGAAA_L005_R1_001.fastq.gz Exocrine_GTGAAA_L005_R2_001.fastq.gz,fastq fastq,9528535334.0,47170967.0,ena RUN GIGA R  University of Liege 05 08 2015 16:56:42:490 16,0:101 1:101,A:2522050794;C:2076658898;G:2097686086;T:2672752253;N:159387303,101,101,,,2522050794,2076658898,2097686086,2672752253,159387303,ERX1054574,ERS805780,ERA463595,"GIGA-R, University of Liege|European Nucleotide Archive","GIGA-R, University of Liege",2,0.48352,0.37495,0.01258,0.01002,0.94194,0.95345,0.51746,0.51938,101,101,B,B,biological fallback assumption,illumina,hiseq_era,unknown,poly_a,trueseq,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Belgium,2015-08-05,Adult,Adult,Undetermined,Undetermined
320,ERR977590,ERX1054573,ERS805779,ERP011346,PRJEB10140,RNAseq from the pancreatic acinar  alpha  beta and delta cells from zebrafish,"ena-STUDY-GIGA-R, University of Liege-05-08-2015-10:47:24:447-55",Other,We took advantage of zebrafish transgenic tools to isolate by FACS the major pancreatic cell types and obtain pure preparations of endocrine a   ß  and d cells as well as exocrine acinar and ductal cells.,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2017 01 31|ENA LAST UPDATE:2017 01 31,,Acinar cells from adults purified by FACS,Acinar cells R1 1,SAMEA3498630,"GIGA-R, University of Liege",ENA first public:2017 01 31|ENA last update:2015 08 05|External Id:SAMEA3498630|INSDC center alias:GIGA R  University of Liege|INSDC center name:GIGA R  University of Liege|INSDC first public:2017 01 31T17:01:11Z|INSDC last update:2015 08 05T16:56:59Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:35|cell type:Pancreatic Acinar cells|collected by:Isabelle Manfroid|common name:zebrafish|dev stage:Adult|isolate:Tgptf1a:GFP|lab host:ZDDM|sample name:35,,,,,,,,,Illumina HiSeq 2000 paired end sequencing,ena EXPERIMENT GIGA R  University of Liege 05 08 2015 16:56:42:489 15,Acinar R1 1,1,Truseq DNA Sample prep,,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,Oligo-dT,PAIRED,ILLUMINA,Illumina HiSeq 2000,,ERP011346,Illumina HiSeq 2000 paired end sequencing,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2017 01 31|ENA LAST UPDATE:2018 11 16,Exocrine_30000_GTGAAA_L008_R1_001.fastq.gz Exocrine_30000_GTGAAA_L008_R2_001.fastq.gz,fastq fastq,2352127188.0,11644194.0,ena RUN GIGA R  University of Liege 05 08 2015 16:56:42:489 15,0:101 1:101,A:575791638;C:562486325;G:570096367;T:643677230;N:75628,101,101,,,575791638,562486325,570096367,643677230,75628,ERX1054573,ERS805779,ERA463595,"GIGA-R, University of Liege|European Nucleotide Archive","GIGA-R, University of Liege",2,0.96358,0.92791,0.02614,0.02577,0.91534,0.92786,0.51791,0.51855,101,101,B,B,biological fallback assumption,illumina,hiseq_era,unknown,poly_a,trueseq,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Belgium,2015-08-05,Adult,Adult,Undetermined,Undetermined
322,ERR977588,ERX1054571,ERS805777,ERP011346,PRJEB10140,RNAseq from the pancreatic acinar  alpha  beta and delta cells from zebrafish,"ena-STUDY-GIGA-R, University of Liege-05-08-2015-10:47:24:447-55",Other,We took advantage of zebrafish transgenic tools to isolate by FACS the major pancreatic cell types and obtain pure preparations of endocrine a   ß  and d cells as well as exocrine acinar and ductal cells.,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2017 01 31|ENA LAST UPDATE:2017 01 31,,Delta cells from adults purified by FACS,Delta cells R2,SAMEA3498628,"GIGA-R, University of Liege",ENA first public:2017 01 31|ENA last update:2015 08 05|External Id:SAMEA3498628|INSDC center alias:GIGA R  University of Liege|INSDC center name:GIGA R  University of Liege|INSDC first public:2017 01 31T17:01:11Z|INSDC last update:2015 08 05T16:56:59Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:33|cell type:Pancreatic Delta cells|collected by:Estefania Tarifeño Saldivia|common name:zebrafish|dev stage:Adult|isolate:Tgsst2:GFP|lab host:ZDDM|sample name:33,,,,,,,,,Illumina HiSeq 2000 paired end sequencing,ena EXPERIMENT GIGA R  University of Liege 05 08 2015 16:56:42:489 13,Delta R2,1,Truseq DNA Sample prep,,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,Oligo-dT,PAIRED,ILLUMINA,Illumina HiSeq 2000,,ERP011346,Illumina HiSeq 2000 paired end sequencing,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2017 01 31|ENA LAST UPDATE:2018 11 16,STS2_cDNA_A085_CAGATC_L003_R1_001.fastq.gz STS2_cDNA_A085_CAGATC_L003_R2_001.fastq.gz,fastq fastq,9070241774.0,44902187.0,ena RUN GIGA R  University of Liege 05 08 2015 16:56:42:489 13,0:101 1:101,A:2535637917;C:1854694115;G:1908489704;T:2770396981;N:1023057,101,101,,,2535637917,1854694115,1908489704,2770396981,1023057,ERX1054571,ERS805777,ERA463595,"GIGA-R, University of Liege|European Nucleotide Archive","GIGA-R, University of Liege",2,0.94245,0.86716,0.11229,0.13234,0.76114,0.78171,0.38511,0.43811,101,101,B,B,biological fallback assumption,illumina,hiseq_era,unknown,poly_a,trueseq,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Belgium,2015-08-05,Adult,Adult,Undetermined,Undetermined
323,ERR977587,ERX1054570,ERS805776,ERP011346,PRJEB10140,RNAseq from the pancreatic acinar  alpha  beta and delta cells from zebrafish,"ena-STUDY-GIGA-R, University of Liege-05-08-2015-10:47:24:447-55",Other,We took advantage of zebrafish transgenic tools to isolate by FACS the major pancreatic cell types and obtain pure preparations of endocrine a   ß  and d cells as well as exocrine acinar and ductal cells.,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2017 01 31|ENA LAST UPDATE:2017 01 31,,Delta cells from adults purified by FACS,Delta cells R1 2,SAMEA3498627,"GIGA-R, University of Liege",ENA first public:2017 01 31|ENA last update:2015 08 05|External Id:SAMEA3498627|INSDC center alias:GIGA R  University of Liege|INSDC center name:GIGA R  University of Liege|INSDC first public:2017 01 31T17:01:11Z|INSDC last update:2015 08 05T16:56:59Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:32|cell type:Pancreatic Delta cells|collected by:Estefania Tarifeño Saldivia|common name:zebrafish|dev stage:Adult|isolate:Tgsst2:GFP|lab host:ZDDM|sample name:32,,,,,,,,,Illumina HiSeq 2000 paired end sequencing,ena EXPERIMENT GIGA R  University of Liege 05 08 2015 16:56:42:489 12,Delta R1 2,1,Truseq DNA Sample prep,,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,Oligo-dT,PAIRED,ILLUMINA,Illumina HiSeq 2000,,ERP011346,Illumina HiSeq 2000 paired end sequencing,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2017 01 31|ENA LAST UPDATE:2018 11 16,SST1_A027_CCGTCC_L004_R1_001.fastq.gz SST1_A027_CCGTCC_L004_R2_001.fastq.gz,fastq fastq,7937290636.0,39293518.0,ena RUN GIGA R  University of Liege 05 08 2015 16:56:42:489 12,0:101 1:101,A:2179525147;C:1634082904;G:1676353742;T:2446333583;N:995260,101,101,,,2179525147,1634082904,1676353742,2446333583,995260,ERX1054570,ERS805776,ERA463595,"GIGA-R, University of Liege|European Nucleotide Archive","GIGA-R, University of Liege",2,0.81928,0.64028,0.09426,0.0961,0.80626,0.83763,0.33992,0.39097,101,101,B,B,biological fallback assumption,illumina,hiseq_era,unknown,poly_a,trueseq,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Belgium,2015-08-05,Adult,Adult,Undetermined,Undetermined
324,ERR977586,ERX1054569,ERS805775,ERP011346,PRJEB10140,RNAseq from the pancreatic acinar  alpha  beta and delta cells from zebrafish,"ena-STUDY-GIGA-R, University of Liege-05-08-2015-10:47:24:447-55",Other,We took advantage of zebrafish transgenic tools to isolate by FACS the major pancreatic cell types and obtain pure preparations of endocrine a   ß  and d cells as well as exocrine acinar and ductal cells.,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2017 01 31|ENA LAST UPDATE:2017 01 31,,Delta cells from adults purified by FACS,Delta cells R1 1,SAMEA3498626,"GIGA-R, University of Liege",ENA first public:2017 01 31|ENA last update:2015 08 05|External Id:SAMEA3498626|INSDC center alias:GIGA R  University of Liege|INSDC center name:GIGA R  University of Liege|INSDC first public:2017 01 31T17:01:11Z|INSDC last update:2015 08 05T16:56:59Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:31|cell type:Pancreatic Delta cells|collected by:Estefania Tarifeño Saldivia|common name:zebrafish|dev stage:Adult|isolate:Tgsst2:GFP|lab host:ZDDM|sample name:31,,,,,,,,,Illumina HiSeq 2000 paired end sequencing,ena EXPERIMENT GIGA R  University of Liege 05 08 2015 16:56:42:488 11,Delta R1 1,1,Truseq DNA Sample prep,,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,Oligo-dT,PAIRED,ILLUMINA,Illumina HiSeq 2000,,ERP011346,Illumina HiSeq 2000 paired end sequencing,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2017 01 31|ENA LAST UPDATE:2018 11 16,SST_CCGTCC_L005_R1_001.fastq.gz SST_CCGTCC_L005_R2_001.fastq.gz,fastq fastq,2808424382.0,13903091.0,ena RUN GIGA R  University of Liege 05 08 2015 16:56:42:489 11,0:101 1:101,A:745970072;C:575317830;G:590596279;T:849527061;N:47013140,101,101,,,745970072,575317830,590596279,849527061,47013140,ERX1054569,ERS805775,ERA463595,"GIGA-R, University of Liege|European Nucleotide Archive","GIGA-R, University of Liege",2,0.80308,0.60403,0.09111,0.08841,0.80582,0.84035,0.34177,0.38788,101,101,B,B,biological fallback assumption,illumina,hiseq_era,unknown,poly_a,trueseq,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Belgium,2015-08-05,Adult,Adult,Undetermined,Undetermined
325,ERR977585,ERX1054568,ERS805774,ERP011346,PRJEB10140,RNAseq from the pancreatic acinar  alpha  beta and delta cells from zebrafish,"ena-STUDY-GIGA-R, University of Liege-05-08-2015-10:47:24:447-55",Other,We took advantage of zebrafish transgenic tools to isolate by FACS the major pancreatic cell types and obtain pure preparations of endocrine a   ß  and d cells as well as exocrine acinar and ductal cells.,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2017 01 31|ENA LAST UPDATE:2017 01 31,,Alpha cells from adults purified by FACS,Alpha cells R3,SAMEA3498625,"GIGA-R, University of Liege",ENA first public:2017 01 31|ENA last update:2015 08 05|External Id:SAMEA3498625|INSDC center alias:GIGA R  University of Liege|INSDC center name:GIGA R  University of Liege|INSDC first public:2017 01 31T17:01:11Z|INSDC last update:2015 08 05T16:56:59Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:30|cell type:Pancreatic Alpha cells|collected by:Estefania Tarifeño Saldivia|common name:zebrafish|dev stage:Adult|isolate:Tggcga:GFP;Tgins:NTR mCherry|lab host:ZDDM|sample name:30,,,,,,,,,Illumina HiSeq 2000 paired end sequencing,ena EXPERIMENT GIGA R  University of Liege 05 08 2015 16:56:42:488 10,Alpha R3,1,Truseq DNA Sample prep,,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,Oligo-dT,PAIRED,ILLUMINA,Illumina HiSeq 2000,,ERP011346,Illumina HiSeq 2000 paired end sequencing,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2017 01 31|ENA LAST UPDATE:2018 11 16,NGS14-B175_AlphaCells-12122013_CTTGTA_L002_R1_001.fastq.gz NGS14-B175_AlphaCells-12122013_CTTGTA_L002_R2_001.fastq.gz,fastq fastq,18205394430.0,90125715.0,ena RUN GIGA R  University of Liege 05 08 2015 16:56:42:488 10,0:101 1:101,A:5028541426;C:3813667922;G:3871329588;T:5386457109;N:105398385,101,101,,,5028541426,3813667922,3871329588,5386457109,105398385,ERX1054568,ERS805774,ERA463595,"GIGA-R, University of Liege|European Nucleotide Archive","GIGA-R, University of Liege",2,0.84473,0.83714,0.12924,0.13497,0.76581,0.77928,0.43397,0.42534,101,101,B,B,biological fallback assumption,illumina,hiseq_era,unknown,poly_a,trueseq,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Belgium,2015-08-05,Adult,Adult,Undetermined,Undetermined
326,ERR977584,ERX1054567,ERS805773,ERP011346,PRJEB10140,RNAseq from the pancreatic acinar  alpha  beta and delta cells from zebrafish,"ena-STUDY-GIGA-R, University of Liege-05-08-2015-10:47:24:447-55",Other,We took advantage of zebrafish transgenic tools to isolate by FACS the major pancreatic cell types and obtain pure preparations of endocrine a   ß  and d cells as well as exocrine acinar and ductal cells.,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2017 01 31|ENA LAST UPDATE:2017 01 31,,Alpha cells from adults purified by FACS,Alpha cells R2 2,SAMEA3498624,"GIGA-R, University of Liege",ENA first public:2017 01 31|ENA last update:2015 08 05|External Id:SAMEA3498624|INSDC center alias:GIGA R  University of Liege|INSDC center name:GIGA R  University of Liege|INSDC first public:2017 01 31T17:01:11Z|INSDC last update:2015 08 05T16:56:59Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:29|cell type:Pancreatic Alpha cells|collected by:Estefania Tarifeño Saldivia|common name:zebrafish|dev stage:Adult|isolate:Tggcga:GFP;Tgins:NTR mCherry|lab host:ZDDM|sample name:29,,,,,,,,,Illumina HiSeq 2000 paired end sequencing,ena EXPERIMENT GIGA R  University of Liege 05 08 2015 16:56:42:488 9,Alpha R2 2,1,Truseq DNA Sample prep,,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,Oligo-dT,PAIRED,ILLUMINA,Illumina HiSeq 2000,,ERP011346,Illumina HiSeq 2000 paired end sequencing,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2017 01 31|ENA LAST UPDATE:2018 11 16,A084_Alpha2cDNA_GCCAAT_L006_R1_001.fastq.gz A084_Alpha2cDNA_GCCAAT_L006_R2_001.fastq.gz,fastq fastq,8621351314.0,42679957.0,ena RUN GIGA R  University of Liege 05 08 2015 16:56:42:488 9,0:101 1:101,A:2420008540;C:1748459249;G:1778002039;T:2610255006;N:64626480,101,101,,,2420008540,1748459249,1778002039,2610255006,64626480,ERX1054567,ERS805773,ERA463595,"GIGA-R, University of Liege|European Nucleotide Archive","GIGA-R, University of Liege",2,0.8123,0.7894,0.13948,0.14682,0.76609,0.78624,0.43594,0.4281,101,101,B,B,biological fallback assumption,illumina,hiseq_era,unknown,poly_a,trueseq,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Belgium,2015-08-05,Adult,Adult,Undetermined,Undetermined
327,ERR977583,ERX1054566,ERS805772,ERP011346,PRJEB10140,RNAseq from the pancreatic acinar  alpha  beta and delta cells from zebrafish,"ena-STUDY-GIGA-R, University of Liege-05-08-2015-10:47:24:447-55",Other,We took advantage of zebrafish transgenic tools to isolate by FACS the major pancreatic cell types and obtain pure preparations of endocrine a   ß  and d cells as well as exocrine acinar and ductal cells.,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2017 01 31|ENA LAST UPDATE:2017 01 31,,Alpha cells from adults purified by FACS,Alpha cells R2 1,SAMEA3498623,"GIGA-R, University of Liege",ENA first public:2017 01 31|ENA last update:2015 08 05|External Id:SAMEA3498623|INSDC center alias:GIGA R  University of Liege|INSDC center name:GIGA R  University of Liege|INSDC first public:2017 01 31T17:01:11Z|INSDC last update:2015 08 05T16:56:59Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:28|cell type:Pancreatic Alpha cells|collected by:Estefania Tarifeño Saldivia|common name:zebrafish|dev stage:Adult|isolate:Tggcga:GFP;Tgins:NTR mCherry|lab host:ZDDM|sample name:28,,,,,,,,,Illumina HiSeq 2000 paired end sequencing,ena EXPERIMENT GIGA R  University of Liege 05 08 2015 16:56:42:488 8,Alpha R2 1,1,Truseq DNA Sample prep,,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,Oligo-dT,PAIRED,ILLUMINA,Illumina HiSeq 2000,,ERP011346,Illumina HiSeq 2000 paired end sequencing,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2017 01 31|ENA LAST UPDATE:2018 11 16,Alpha_2_cDNA_A084_GCCAAT_L003_R1_001.fastq.gz Alpha_2_cDNA_A084_GCCAAT_L003_R2_001.fastq.gz,fastq fastq,7447261462.0,36867631.0,ena RUN GIGA R  University of Liege 05 08 2015 16:56:42:488 8,0:101 1:101,A:2085646680;C:1521470549;G:1568678066;T:2270630726;N:835441,101,101,,,2085646680,1521470549,1568678066,2270630726,835441,ERX1054566,ERS805772,ERA463595,"GIGA-R, University of Liege|European Nucleotide Archive","GIGA-R, University of Liege",2,0.81689,0.79405,0.13796,0.14503,0.76583,0.78535,0.40729,0.42815,101,101,B,B,biological fallback assumption,illumina,hiseq_era,unknown,poly_a,trueseq,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Belgium,2015-08-05,Adult,Adult,Undetermined,Undetermined
328,ERR977582,ERX1054565,ERS805771,ERP011346,PRJEB10140,RNAseq from the pancreatic acinar  alpha  beta and delta cells from zebrafish,"ena-STUDY-GIGA-R, University of Liege-05-08-2015-10:47:24:447-55",Other,We took advantage of zebrafish transgenic tools to isolate by FACS the major pancreatic cell types and obtain pure preparations of endocrine a   ß  and d cells as well as exocrine acinar and ductal cells.,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2017 01 31|ENA LAST UPDATE:2017 01 31,,Alpha cells from adults purified by FACS,Alpha cells R1 2,SAMEA3498622,"GIGA-R, University of Liege",ENA first public:2017 01 31|ENA last update:2015 08 05|External Id:SAMEA3498622|INSDC center alias:GIGA R  University of Liege|INSDC center name:GIGA R  University of Liege|INSDC first public:2017 01 31T17:01:11Z|INSDC last update:2015 08 05T16:56:59Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:27|cell type:Pancreatic Alpha cells|collected by:Estefania Tarifeño Saldivia|common name:zebrafish|dev stage:Adult|isolate:Tggcga:GFP;Tgins:NTR mCherry|lab host:ZDDM|sample name:27,,,,,,,,,Illumina HiSeq 2000 paired end sequencing,ena EXPERIMENT GIGA R  University of Liege 05 08 2015 16:56:42:488 7,Alpha R1 2,1,Truseq DNA Sample prep,,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,Oligo-dT,PAIRED,ILLUMINA,Illumina HiSeq 2000,,ERP011346,Illumina HiSeq 2000 paired end sequencing,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2017 01 31|ENA LAST UPDATE:2018 11 16,A083_Alpha1cDNA_ACAGTG_L006_R1_001.fastq.gz A083_Alpha1cDNA_ACAGTG_L006_R2_001.fastq.gz,fastq fastq,8598483904.0,42566752.0,ena RUN GIGA R  University of Liege 05 08 2015 16:56:42:488 7,0:101 1:101,A:2424152802;C:1756999772;G:1780718036;T:2571949581;N:64663713,101,101,,,2424152802,1756999772,1780718036,2571949581,64663713,ERX1054565,ERS805771,ERA463595,"GIGA-R, University of Liege|European Nucleotide Archive","GIGA-R, University of Liege",2,0.80654,0.78693,0.13676,0.14263,0.76475,0.78173,0.4476,0.44884,101,101,B,B,biological fallback assumption,illumina,hiseq_era,unknown,poly_a,trueseq,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Belgium,2015-08-05,Adult,Adult,Undetermined,Undetermined
329,ERR977581,ERX1054564,ERS805770,ERP011346,PRJEB10140,RNAseq from the pancreatic acinar  alpha  beta and delta cells from zebrafish,"ena-STUDY-GIGA-R, University of Liege-05-08-2015-10:47:24:447-55",Other,We took advantage of zebrafish transgenic tools to isolate by FACS the major pancreatic cell types and obtain pure preparations of endocrine a   ß  and d cells as well as exocrine acinar and ductal cells.,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2017 01 31|ENA LAST UPDATE:2017 01 31,,Alpha cells from adults purified by FACS,Alpha cells R1 1,SAMEA3498621,"GIGA-R, University of Liege",ENA first public:2017 01 31|ENA last update:2015 08 05|External Id:SAMEA3498621|INSDC center alias:GIGA R  University of Liege|INSDC center name:GIGA R  University of Liege|INSDC first public:2017 01 31T17:01:11Z|INSDC last update:2015 08 05T16:56:59Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:26|cell type:Pancreatic Alpha cells|collected by:Estefania Tarifeño Saldivia|common name:zebrafish|dev stage:Adult|isolate:Tggcga:GFP;Tgins:NTR mCherry|lab host:ZDDM|sample name:26|strain:Tggcga:GFP; Tgins:NTR mCherry,,,,,,,,,Illumina HiSeq 2000 paired end sequencing,ena EXPERIMENT GIGA R  University of Liege 05 08 2015 16:56:42:487 6,Alpha R1 1,1,Truseq DNA Sample prep,,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,Oligo-dT,PAIRED,ILLUMINA,Illumina HiSeq 2000,,ERP011346,Illumina HiSeq 2000 paired end sequencing,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2017 01 31|ENA LAST UPDATE:2018 11 16,Alpha1_cDNA_A083_ACAGTG_L003_R2_001.fastq.gz Alpha1_cDNA_A083_ACAGTG_L003_R1_001.fastq.gz,fastq fastq,7584054852.0,37544826.0,ena RUN GIGA R  University of Liege 05 08 2015 16:56:42:487 6,0:101 1:101,A:2134120600;C:1561394450;G:1604139016;T:2283553056;N:847730,101,101,,,2134120600,1561394450,1604139016,2283553056,847730,ERX1054564,ERS805770,ERA463595,"GIGA-R, University of Liege|European Nucleotide Archive","GIGA-R, University of Liege",2,0.8102,0.79183,0.13509,0.1414,0.76459,0.77958,0.44897,0.42232,101,101,B,B,biological fallback assumption,illumina,hiseq_era,unknown,poly_a,trueseq,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Belgium,2015-08-05,Adult,Adult,Undetermined,Undetermined
9337,ERR2865439,ERX2871399,ERS2871019,ERP111778,PRJEB29472,RNAseq analysis of slbp mutants in Zebrafish,ena-STUDY-Department of Cell and Developmental Biology-01-11-2018-15:10:58:144-14,Other,Through forward genetic screening for mutations affecting visual system development  we identified prominent coloboma and cell autonomous retinal neuron differentiation  lamination and retinal axon projection defects in eisspalte ele mutant zebrafish. Additional axonal deficits were present  most notably at midline axon commissures. Genetic mapping and cloning of the ele mutation showed that the affected gene is slbp  which encodes a conserved RNA stem loop binding protein involved in replication dependent histone mRNA metabolism. Cells throughout the central nervous system remained in the cell cycle in ele mutant embryos at stages when  and locations where  post mitotic cells have differentiated in wild type siblings. Indeed  RNAseq analysis showed down regulation of many genes associated with neuronal differentiation. This was coincident with changes in the levels and spatial localisation of expression of various genes implicated  for instance  in axon guidance  that likely underlie specific ele phenotypes. These results suggest that many of the cell and tissue specific phenotypes in ele mutant embryos are secondary to altered expression of modules of developmental regulatory genes that characterise  or promote transitions in  cell state and require the correct function of Slbp dependent histone and chromatin regulatory genes.,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2018 11 02|ENA LAST UPDATE:2018 11 01,,,sibling 3,SAMEA5059848,Department of Cell and Developmental Biology,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2018 11 02T17:01:55Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2018 11 01T15:11:02Z|External Id:SAMEA5059848|INSDC center name:Department of Cell and Developmental Biology|INSDC first public:2018 11 02T17:01:55Z|INSDC last update:2018 11 01T15:11:02Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:ele sibling3|common name:zebrafish|sample name:ele sibling3|scientific name:Danio rerio,,,,,,,,,Illumina HiSeq 3000 paired end sequencing,ena EXPERIMENT Department of Cell and Developmental Biology 01 11 2018 15:10:57:717 6,unspecified,1,,,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,other,PAIRED,ILLUMINA,Illumina HiSeq 3000,,ERP111778,Illumina HiSeq 3000 paired end sequencing,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2018 11 02|ENA LAST UPDATE:2018 11 16,ele_sib_F_CTTGTA_L004_R2_001.fastq.gz ele_sib_F_CTTGTA_L004_R1_001.fastq.gz,fastq fastq,2823621200.0,14118106.0,ena RUN Department of Cell and Developmental Biology 01 11 2018 15:10:57:717 6,0:100 1:100,A:752781583;C:663838191;G:656422705;T:750213027;N:365694,100,100,,,752781583,663838191,656422705,750213027,365694,ERX2871399,ERS2871019,ERA1643817,Department of Cell and Developmental Biology|European Nucleotide Archive,Department of Cell and Developmental Biology,2,0.95595,0.95486,0.09407,0.09431,0.67529,0.67673,0.45173,0.44515,100,100,B,B,biological fallback assumption,illumina,hiseq_era,unknown,other,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Unknown,2018-11-01,Undetermined,Embryo,Undetermined,Embryo Imprecise
9338,ERR2865438,ERX2871398,ERS2871018,ERP111778,PRJEB29472,RNAseq analysis of slbp mutants in Zebrafish,ena-STUDY-Department of Cell and Developmental Biology-01-11-2018-15:10:58:144-14,Other,Through forward genetic screening for mutations affecting visual system development  we identified prominent coloboma and cell autonomous retinal neuron differentiation  lamination and retinal axon projection defects in eisspalte ele mutant zebrafish. Additional axonal deficits were present  most notably at midline axon commissures. Genetic mapping and cloning of the ele mutation showed that the affected gene is slbp  which encodes a conserved RNA stem loop binding protein involved in replication dependent histone mRNA metabolism. Cells throughout the central nervous system remained in the cell cycle in ele mutant embryos at stages when  and locations where  post mitotic cells have differentiated in wild type siblings. Indeed  RNAseq analysis showed down regulation of many genes associated with neuronal differentiation. This was coincident with changes in the levels and spatial localisation of expression of various genes implicated  for instance  in axon guidance  that likely underlie specific ele phenotypes. These results suggest that many of the cell and tissue specific phenotypes in ele mutant embryos are secondary to altered expression of modules of developmental regulatory genes that characterise  or promote transitions in  cell state and require the correct function of Slbp dependent histone and chromatin regulatory genes.,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2018 11 02|ENA LAST UPDATE:2018 11 01,,,sibling 2,SAMEA5059847,Department of Cell and Developmental Biology,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2018 11 02T17:01:55Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2018 11 01T15:11:02Z|External Id:SAMEA5059847|INSDC center name:Department of Cell and Developmental Biology|INSDC first public:2018 11 02T17:01:55Z|INSDC last update:2018 11 01T15:11:02Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:ele sibling2|common name:zebrafish|sample name:ele sibling2|scientific name:Danio rerio,,,,,,,,,Illumina HiSeq 3000 paired end sequencing,ena EXPERIMENT Department of Cell and Developmental Biology 01 11 2018 15:10:57:717 5,unspecified,1,,,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,other,PAIRED,ILLUMINA,Illumina HiSeq 3000,,ERP111778,Illumina HiSeq 3000 paired end sequencing,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2018 11 02|ENA LAST UPDATE:2018 11 16,ele_sib_D_GCCAAT_L004_R1_001.fastq.gz ele_sib_D_GCCAAT_L004_R2_001.fastq.gz,fastq fastq,4217962600.0,21089813.0,ena RUN Department of Cell and Developmental Biology 01 11 2018 15:10:57:717 5,0:100 1:100,A:1119324653;C:996982862;G:984906708;T:1116209552;N:538825,100,100,,,1119324653,996982862,984906708,1116209552,538825,ERX2871398,ERS2871018,ERA1643817,Department of Cell and Developmental Biology|European Nucleotide Archive,Department of Cell and Developmental Biology,2,0.95341,0.95274,0.09215,0.09238,0.67296,0.67493,0.46185,0.4648,100,100,B,B,biological fallback assumption,illumina,hiseq_era,unknown,other,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Unknown,2018-11-01,Undetermined,Embryo,Undetermined,Embryo Imprecise
9339,ERR2865437,ERX2871397,ERS2871017,ERP111778,PRJEB29472,RNAseq analysis of slbp mutants in Zebrafish,ena-STUDY-Department of Cell and Developmental Biology-01-11-2018-15:10:58:144-14,Other,Through forward genetic screening for mutations affecting visual system development  we identified prominent coloboma and cell autonomous retinal neuron differentiation  lamination and retinal axon projection defects in eisspalte ele mutant zebrafish. Additional axonal deficits were present  most notably at midline axon commissures. Genetic mapping and cloning of the ele mutation showed that the affected gene is slbp  which encodes a conserved RNA stem loop binding protein involved in replication dependent histone mRNA metabolism. Cells throughout the central nervous system remained in the cell cycle in ele mutant embryos at stages when  and locations where  post mitotic cells have differentiated in wild type siblings. Indeed  RNAseq analysis showed down regulation of many genes associated with neuronal differentiation. This was coincident with changes in the levels and spatial localisation of expression of various genes implicated  for instance  in axon guidance  that likely underlie specific ele phenotypes. These results suggest that many of the cell and tissue specific phenotypes in ele mutant embryos are secondary to altered expression of modules of developmental regulatory genes that characterise  or promote transitions in  cell state and require the correct function of Slbp dependent histone and chromatin regulatory genes.,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2018 11 02|ENA LAST UPDATE:2018 11 01,,,sibling 1,SAMEA5059846,Department of Cell and Developmental Biology,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2018 11 02T17:01:55Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2018 11 01T15:11:02Z|External Id:SAMEA5059846|INSDC center name:Department of Cell and Developmental Biology|INSDC first public:2018 11 02T17:01:55Z|INSDC last update:2018 11 01T15:11:02Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:ele sibling1|common name:zebrafish|sample name:ele sibling1|scientific name:Danio rerio,,,,,,,,,Illumina HiSeq 3000 paired end sequencing,ena EXPERIMENT Department of Cell and Developmental Biology 01 11 2018 15:10:57:717 4,unspecified,1,,,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,other,PAIRED,ILLUMINA,Illumina HiSeq 3000,,ERP111778,Illumina HiSeq 3000 paired end sequencing,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2018 11 02|ENA LAST UPDATE:2018 11 16,ele_sib_B_TGACCA_L004_R1_001.fastq.gz ele_sib_B_TGACCA_L004_R2_001.fastq.gz,fastq fastq,5241628000.0,26208140.0,ena RUN Department of Cell and Developmental Biology 01 11 2018 15:10:57:717 4,0:100 1:100,A:1393802799;C:1235804455;G:1219328189;T:1392021956;N:670601,100,100,,,1393802799,1235804455,1219328189,1392021956,670601,ERX2871397,ERS2871017,ERA1643817,Department of Cell and Developmental Biology|European Nucleotide Archive,Department of Cell and Developmental Biology,2,0.95296,0.95133,0.10275,0.1028,0.67018,0.67146,0.46488,0.46482,100,100,B,B,biological fallback assumption,illumina,hiseq_era,unknown,other,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Unknown,2018-11-01,Undetermined,Embryo,Undetermined,Embryo Imprecise
9340,ERR2865436,ERX2871396,ERS2871016,ERP111778,PRJEB29472,RNAseq analysis of slbp mutants in Zebrafish,ena-STUDY-Department of Cell and Developmental Biology-01-11-2018-15:10:58:144-14,Other,Through forward genetic screening for mutations affecting visual system development  we identified prominent coloboma and cell autonomous retinal neuron differentiation  lamination and retinal axon projection defects in eisspalte ele mutant zebrafish. Additional axonal deficits were present  most notably at midline axon commissures. Genetic mapping and cloning of the ele mutation showed that the affected gene is slbp  which encodes a conserved RNA stem loop binding protein involved in replication dependent histone mRNA metabolism. Cells throughout the central nervous system remained in the cell cycle in ele mutant embryos at stages when  and locations where  post mitotic cells have differentiated in wild type siblings. Indeed  RNAseq analysis showed down regulation of many genes associated with neuronal differentiation. This was coincident with changes in the levels and spatial localisation of expression of various genes implicated  for instance  in axon guidance  that likely underlie specific ele phenotypes. These results suggest that many of the cell and tissue specific phenotypes in ele mutant embryos are secondary to altered expression of modules of developmental regulatory genes that characterise  or promote transitions in  cell state and require the correct function of Slbp dependent histone and chromatin regulatory genes.,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2018 11 02|ENA LAST UPDATE:2018 11 01,,,mutant3,SAMEA5059845,Department of Cell and Developmental Biology,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2018 11 02T17:01:55Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2018 11 01T15:11:02Z|External Id:SAMEA5059845|INSDC center name:Department of Cell and Developmental Biology|INSDC first public:2018 11 02T17:01:55Z|INSDC last update:2018 11 01T15:11:02Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:ele mutant3|common name:zebrafish|sample name:ele mutant3|scientific name:Danio rerio,,,,,,,,,Illumina HiSeq 3000 paired end sequencing,ena EXPERIMENT Department of Cell and Developmental Biology 01 11 2018 15:10:57:717 3,unspecified,1,,,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,other,PAIRED,ILLUMINA,Illumina HiSeq 3000,,ERP111778,Illumina HiSeq 3000 paired end sequencing,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2018 11 02|ENA LAST UPDATE:2018 11 16,ele_E_CAGATC_L004_R1_001.fastq.gz ele_E_CAGATC_L004_R2_001.fastq.gz,fastq fastq,3529752000.0,17648760.0,ena RUN Department of Cell and Developmental Biology 01 11 2018 15:10:57:717 3,0:100 1:100,A:933354224;C:837396695;G:828677816;T:929860782;N:462483,100,100,,,933354224,837396695,828677816,929860782,462483,ERX2871396,ERS2871016,ERA1643817,Department of Cell and Developmental Biology|European Nucleotide Archive,Department of Cell and Developmental Biology,2,0.95621,0.95302,0.08584,0.08536,0.67048,0.67146,0.46615,0.46682,100,100,B,B,biological fallback assumption,illumina,hiseq_era,unknown,other,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Unknown,2018-11-01,Undetermined,Embryo,Undetermined,Embryo Imprecise
9341,ERR2865435,ERX2871395,ERS2871015,ERP111778,PRJEB29472,RNAseq analysis of slbp mutants in Zebrafish,ena-STUDY-Department of Cell and Developmental Biology-01-11-2018-15:10:58:144-14,Other,Through forward genetic screening for mutations affecting visual system development  we identified prominent coloboma and cell autonomous retinal neuron differentiation  lamination and retinal axon projection defects in eisspalte ele mutant zebrafish. Additional axonal deficits were present  most notably at midline axon commissures. Genetic mapping and cloning of the ele mutation showed that the affected gene is slbp  which encodes a conserved RNA stem loop binding protein involved in replication dependent histone mRNA metabolism. Cells throughout the central nervous system remained in the cell cycle in ele mutant embryos at stages when  and locations where  post mitotic cells have differentiated in wild type siblings. Indeed  RNAseq analysis showed down regulation of many genes associated with neuronal differentiation. This was coincident with changes in the levels and spatial localisation of expression of various genes implicated  for instance  in axon guidance  that likely underlie specific ele phenotypes. These results suggest that many of the cell and tissue specific phenotypes in ele mutant embryos are secondary to altered expression of modules of developmental regulatory genes that characterise  or promote transitions in  cell state and require the correct function of Slbp dependent histone and chromatin regulatory genes.,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2018 11 02|ENA LAST UPDATE:2018 11 01,,,mutant2,SAMEA5059844,Department of Cell and Developmental Biology,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2018 11 02T17:01:55Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2018 11 01T15:11:02Z|External Id:SAMEA5059844|INSDC center name:Department of Cell and Developmental Biology|INSDC first public:2018 11 02T17:01:55Z|INSDC last update:2018 11 01T15:11:02Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:ele mutant2|common name:zebrafish|sample name:ele mutant2|scientific name:Danio rerio,,,,,,,,,Illumina HiSeq 3000 paired end sequencing,ena EXPERIMENT Department of Cell and Developmental Biology 01 11 2018 15:10:57:717 2,unspecified,1,,,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,other,PAIRED,ILLUMINA,Illumina HiSeq 3000,,ERP111778,Illumina HiSeq 3000 paired end sequencing,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2018 11 02|ENA LAST UPDATE:2018 11 16,ele_C_ACAGTG_L004_R1_001.fastq.gz ele_C_ACAGTG_L004_R2_001.fastq.gz,fastq fastq,3119723800.0,15598619.0,ena RUN Department of Cell and Developmental Biology 01 11 2018 15:10:57:717 2,0:100 1:100,A:828335602;C:736691663;G:727853394;T:826449133;N:394008,100,100,,,828335602,736691663,727853394,826449133,394008,ERX2871395,ERS2871015,ERA1643817,Department of Cell and Developmental Biology|European Nucleotide Archive,Department of Cell and Developmental Biology,2,0.94967,0.94864,0.0992,0.09955,0.65928,0.66014,0.47042,0.46835,100,100,B,B,biological fallback assumption,illumina,hiseq_era,unknown,other,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Unknown,2018-11-01,Undetermined,Embryo,Undetermined,Embryo Imprecise
9342,ERR2865434,ERX2871394,ERS2871014,ERP111778,PRJEB29472,RNAseq analysis of slbp mutants in Zebrafish,ena-STUDY-Department of Cell and Developmental Biology-01-11-2018-15:10:58:144-14,Other,Through forward genetic screening for mutations affecting visual system development  we identified prominent coloboma and cell autonomous retinal neuron differentiation  lamination and retinal axon projection defects in eisspalte ele mutant zebrafish. Additional axonal deficits were present  most notably at midline axon commissures. Genetic mapping and cloning of the ele mutation showed that the affected gene is slbp  which encodes a conserved RNA stem loop binding protein involved in replication dependent histone mRNA metabolism. Cells throughout the central nervous system remained in the cell cycle in ele mutant embryos at stages when  and locations where  post mitotic cells have differentiated in wild type siblings. Indeed  RNAseq analysis showed down regulation of many genes associated with neuronal differentiation. This was coincident with changes in the levels and spatial localisation of expression of various genes implicated  for instance  in axon guidance  that likely underlie specific ele phenotypes. These results suggest that many of the cell and tissue specific phenotypes in ele mutant embryos are secondary to altered expression of modules of developmental regulatory genes that characterise  or promote transitions in  cell state and require the correct function of Slbp dependent histone and chromatin regulatory genes.,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2018 11 02|ENA LAST UPDATE:2018 11 01,,,mutant1,SAMEA5059843,Department of Cell and Developmental Biology,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2018 11 02T17:01:55Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2018 11 01T15:11:02Z|External Id:SAMEA5059843|INSDC center name:Department of Cell and Developmental Biology|INSDC first public:2018 11 02T17:01:55Z|INSDC last update:2018 11 01T15:11:02Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:ele mutant1|common name:zebrafish|sample name:ele mutant1|scientific name:Danio rerio,,,,,,,,,Illumina HiSeq 3000 paired end sequencing,ena EXPERIMENT Department of Cell and Developmental Biology 01 11 2018 15:10:57:716 1,unspecified,1,,,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,other,PAIRED,ILLUMINA,Illumina HiSeq 3000,,ERP111778,Illumina HiSeq 3000 paired end sequencing,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2018 11 02|ENA LAST UPDATE:2018 11 16,ele_A_CGATGT_L004_R1_001.fastq.gz ele_A_CGATGT_L004_R2_001.fastq.gz,fastq fastq,2181939600.0,10909698.0,ena RUN Department of Cell and Developmental Biology 01 11 2018 15:10:57:717 1,0:100 1:100,A:578028200;C:516249107;G:510965740;T:576417363;N:279190,100,100,,,578028200,516249107,510965740,576417363,279190,ERX2871394,ERS2871014,ERA1643817,Department of Cell and Developmental Biology|European Nucleotide Archive,Department of Cell and Developmental Biology,2,0.94968,0.94939,0.1131,0.11293,0.66245,0.66251,0.46654,0.47475,100,100,B,B,biological fallback assumption,illumina,hiseq_era,unknown,other,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Unknown,2018-11-01,Undetermined,Embryo,Undetermined,Embryo Imprecise
9717,ERR3842002,ERX3854564,ERS4268611,ERP116106,PRJEB33323,Deconstructing the individual steps of vertebrate translation initiation,ena-STUDY-Computational Biology Unit-03-07-2019-10:11:34:314-422,Other,In eukaryotes  the number of ribosomes synthesizing a given protein depends on how many are recruited to its mRNA  their success in navigating its five prime untranslated region UTR and whether they recognize its start codon. Initiation of translation is a rate limiting step in protein synthesis and key to gene expression control 1  but despite this centrality it remains poorly understood 2 3. Here we introduce ribosome complex profiling RCP seq to capture the transcriptome wide occupancy of scanning  initiating  elongating and terminating ribosome complexes in a higher eukaryote. We track scanning and elongating ribosomes across all five prime UTRs in zebrafish  which enable us to assess the individual regulatory contributions from the three stages of initiation: ribosome recruitment  scanning of the five prime UTR and recognition of the start codon. Our data sheds light on small subunit recruitment to mRNAs presenting evidence for the threading model and demonstrates that sequence features regulate this recruitment. We estimate the processivity of scanning ribosomes as they traverse the five prime UTR and show that the repressive effects of upstream open reading frames depend on the efficiency of both translation initiation and termination. Finally  we determine the optimal initiation contexts by directly estimating the conversion of scanning to elongating ribosomes and demonstrate specific regulation of translation initiation at the endoplasmic reticulum. Our results open for the possibility of deconvoluting translation initiation into separate stages and provides the first view of global occupancy of ribosomal small subunits in a vertebrate.,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03,,,Shield 4Ei,SAMEA6504165,Computational Biology Unit,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27T17:05:06Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2020 01 27T16:04:35Z|External Id:SAMEA6504165|INSDC center name:Computational Biology Unit|INSDC first public:2020 03 27T17:05:06Z|INSDC last update:2020 01 27T16:04:35Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:Shield 4Ei|common name:zebrafish|sample name:Shield 4Ei|scientific name:Danio rerio,,,,,,,,,NextSeq 500 sequencing,ena EXPERIMENT Computational Biology Unit 27 01 2020 17:26:02:557 2,Shield 4Ei LSU,OTHER,RCP seq,,OTHER,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,other,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,NextSeq 500,,ERP116106,NextSeq 500 sequencing,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2020 02 14,,,10915827408.0,143629308.0,ena RUN Computational Biology Unit 27 01 2020 17:26:02:557 2,0:76,A:3900515347;C:2409375725;G:3041696977;T:1564127293;N:112066,76,,,,3900515347,2409375725,3041696977,1564127293,112066,ERX3854564,ERS4268611,ERA2359340,Computational Biology Unit|European Nucleotide Archive,Computational Biology Unit,1,0.64398,,0.40944,,0.98817,,0.59337,,76,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,nextseq,unknown,other,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Unknown,2019-07-03,Gastrula,Embryo,Undetermined,Embryo Imprecise
9718,ERR3842001,ERX3854563,ERS4268611,ERP116106,PRJEB33323,Deconstructing the individual steps of vertebrate translation initiation,ena-STUDY-Computational Biology Unit-03-07-2019-10:11:34:314-422,Other,In eukaryotes  the number of ribosomes synthesizing a given protein depends on how many are recruited to its mRNA  their success in navigating its five prime untranslated region UTR and whether they recognize its start codon. Initiation of translation is a rate limiting step in protein synthesis and key to gene expression control 1  but despite this centrality it remains poorly understood 2 3. Here we introduce ribosome complex profiling RCP seq to capture the transcriptome wide occupancy of scanning  initiating  elongating and terminating ribosome complexes in a higher eukaryote. We track scanning and elongating ribosomes across all five prime UTRs in zebrafish  which enable us to assess the individual regulatory contributions from the three stages of initiation: ribosome recruitment  scanning of the five prime UTR and recognition of the start codon. Our data sheds light on small subunit recruitment to mRNAs presenting evidence for the threading model and demonstrates that sequence features regulate this recruitment. We estimate the processivity of scanning ribosomes as they traverse the five prime UTR and show that the repressive effects of upstream open reading frames depend on the efficiency of both translation initiation and termination. Finally  we determine the optimal initiation contexts by directly estimating the conversion of scanning to elongating ribosomes and demonstrate specific regulation of translation initiation at the endoplasmic reticulum. Our results open for the possibility of deconvoluting translation initiation into separate stages and provides the first view of global occupancy of ribosomal small subunits in a vertebrate.,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03,,,Shield 4Ei,SAMEA6504165,Computational Biology Unit,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27T17:05:06Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2020 01 27T16:04:35Z|External Id:SAMEA6504165|INSDC center name:Computational Biology Unit|INSDC first public:2020 03 27T17:05:06Z|INSDC last update:2020 01 27T16:04:35Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:Shield 4Ei|common name:zebrafish|sample name:Shield 4Ei|scientific name:Danio rerio,,,,,,,,,NextSeq 500 sequencing,ena EXPERIMENT Computational Biology Unit 27 01 2020 17:26:02:557 1,Shield 4Ei SSU,OTHER,RCP seq,,OTHER,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,other,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,NextSeq 500,,ERP116106,NextSeq 500 sequencing,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2020 02 14,,,7154041880.0,94132130.0,ena RUN Computational Biology Unit 27 01 2020 17:26:02:557 1,0:76,A:2939474250;C:1489083073;G:1922522149;T:802890185;N:72223,76,,,,2939474250,1489083073,1922522149,802890185,72223,ERX3854563,ERS4268611,ERA2359340,Computational Biology Unit|European Nucleotide Archive,Computational Biology Unit,1,0.4369,,0.25417,,0.9867,,0.60047,,76,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,nextseq,unknown,other,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Unknown,2019-07-03,Gastrula,Embryo,Undetermined,Embryo Imprecise
9719,ERR3842000,ERX3854562,ERS4268611,ERP116106,PRJEB33323,Deconstructing the individual steps of vertebrate translation initiation,ena-STUDY-Computational Biology Unit-03-07-2019-10:11:34:314-422,Other,In eukaryotes  the number of ribosomes synthesizing a given protein depends on how many are recruited to its mRNA  their success in navigating its five prime untranslated region UTR and whether they recognize its start codon. Initiation of translation is a rate limiting step in protein synthesis and key to gene expression control 1  but despite this centrality it remains poorly understood 2 3. Here we introduce ribosome complex profiling RCP seq to capture the transcriptome wide occupancy of scanning  initiating  elongating and terminating ribosome complexes in a higher eukaryote. We track scanning and elongating ribosomes across all five prime UTRs in zebrafish  which enable us to assess the individual regulatory contributions from the three stages of initiation: ribosome recruitment  scanning of the five prime UTR and recognition of the start codon. Our data sheds light on small subunit recruitment to mRNAs presenting evidence for the threading model and demonstrates that sequence features regulate this recruitment. We estimate the processivity of scanning ribosomes as they traverse the five prime UTR and show that the repressive effects of upstream open reading frames depend on the efficiency of both translation initiation and termination. Finally  we determine the optimal initiation contexts by directly estimating the conversion of scanning to elongating ribosomes and demonstrate specific regulation of translation initiation at the endoplasmic reticulum. Our results open for the possibility of deconvoluting translation initiation into separate stages and provides the first view of global occupancy of ribosomal small subunits in a vertebrate.,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03,,,Shield 4Ei,SAMEA6504165,Computational Biology Unit,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27T17:05:06Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2020 01 27T16:04:35Z|External Id:SAMEA6504165|INSDC center name:Computational Biology Unit|INSDC first public:2020 03 27T17:05:06Z|INSDC last update:2020 01 27T16:04:35Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:Shield 4Ei|common name:zebrafish|sample name:Shield 4Ei|scientific name:Danio rerio,,,,,,,,,NextSeq 500 sequencing,ena EXPERIMENT Computational Biology Unit 27 01 2020 16:24:36:406 10,Shield 4Ei,OTHER,RNA Seq,,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,other,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,NextSeq 500,,ERP116106,NextSeq 500 sequencing,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2020 02 14,,,1435748376.0,18891426.0,ena RUN Computational Biology Unit 27 01 2020 16:24:36:406 10,0:76,A:489056518;C:372290023;G:393663734;T:180723629;N:14472,76,,,,489056518,372290023,393663734,180723629,14472,ERX3854562,ERS4268611,ERA2359305,Computational Biology Unit|European Nucleotide Archive,Computational Biology Unit,1,0.11942,,0.03394,,0.98971,,0.62271,,76,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,nextseq,unknown,other,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Unknown,2019-07-03,Gastrula,Embryo,Undetermined,Embryo Imprecise
9720,ERR3841999,ERX3854561,ERS3556006,ERP116106,PRJEB33323,Deconstructing the individual steps of vertebrate translation initiation,ena-STUDY-Computational Biology Unit-03-07-2019-10:11:34:314-422,Other,In eukaryotes  the number of ribosomes synthesizing a given protein depends on how many are recruited to its mRNA  their success in navigating its five prime untranslated region UTR and whether they recognize its start codon. Initiation of translation is a rate limiting step in protein synthesis and key to gene expression control 1  but despite this centrality it remains poorly understood 2 3. Here we introduce ribosome complex profiling RCP seq to capture the transcriptome wide occupancy of scanning  initiating  elongating and terminating ribosome complexes in a higher eukaryote. We track scanning and elongating ribosomes across all five prime UTRs in zebrafish  which enable us to assess the individual regulatory contributions from the three stages of initiation: ribosome recruitment  scanning of the five prime UTR and recognition of the start codon. Our data sheds light on small subunit recruitment to mRNAs presenting evidence for the threading model and demonstrates that sequence features regulate this recruitment. We estimate the processivity of scanning ribosomes as they traverse the five prime UTR and show that the repressive effects of upstream open reading frames depend on the efficiency of both translation initiation and termination. Finally  we determine the optimal initiation contexts by directly estimating the conversion of scanning to elongating ribosomes and demonstrate specific regulation of translation initiation at the endoplasmic reticulum. Our results open for the possibility of deconvoluting translation initiation into separate stages and provides the first view of global occupancy of ribosomal small subunits in a vertebrate.,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03,,,Shield 3,SAMEA5752547,Computational Biology Unit,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|External Id:SAMEA5752547|INSDC center name:Computational Biology Unit|INSDC first public:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|INSDC last update:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:10|common name:zebrafish|dev stage:Shield|sample name:10|scientific name:Danio rerio,,,,,,,,,NextSeq 500 sequencing,ena EXPERIMENT Computational Biology Unit 27 01 2020 16:24:36:406 9,Shield 3,OTHER,RNA Seq,,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,other,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,NextSeq 500,,ERP116106,NextSeq 500 sequencing,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2020 02 14,,,1168482976.0,15374776.0,ena RUN Computational Biology Unit 27 01 2020 16:24:36:406 9,0:76,A:516070340;C:238363428;G:268806793;T:145231087;N:11328,76,,,,516070340,238363428,268806793,145231087,11328,ERX3854561,ERS3556006,ERA2359305,Computational Biology Unit|European Nucleotide Archive,Computational Biology Unit,1,0.22586,,0.10275,,0.97281,,0.47683,,76,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,nextseq,unknown,other,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Unknown,2019-07-03,Gastrula,Embryo,Undetermined,Embryo Imprecise
9721,ERR3841998,ERX3854560,ERS3556007,ERP116106,PRJEB33323,Deconstructing the individual steps of vertebrate translation initiation,ena-STUDY-Computational Biology Unit-03-07-2019-10:11:34:314-422,Other,In eukaryotes  the number of ribosomes synthesizing a given protein depends on how many are recruited to its mRNA  their success in navigating its five prime untranslated region UTR and whether they recognize its start codon. Initiation of translation is a rate limiting step in protein synthesis and key to gene expression control 1  but despite this centrality it remains poorly understood 2 3. Here we introduce ribosome complex profiling RCP seq to capture the transcriptome wide occupancy of scanning  initiating  elongating and terminating ribosome complexes in a higher eukaryote. We track scanning and elongating ribosomes across all five prime UTRs in zebrafish  which enable us to assess the individual regulatory contributions from the three stages of initiation: ribosome recruitment  scanning of the five prime UTR and recognition of the start codon. Our data sheds light on small subunit recruitment to mRNAs presenting evidence for the threading model and demonstrates that sequence features regulate this recruitment. We estimate the processivity of scanning ribosomes as they traverse the five prime UTR and show that the repressive effects of upstream open reading frames depend on the efficiency of both translation initiation and termination. Finally  we determine the optimal initiation contexts by directly estimating the conversion of scanning to elongating ribosomes and demonstrate specific regulation of translation initiation at the endoplasmic reticulum. Our results open for the possibility of deconvoluting translation initiation into separate stages and provides the first view of global occupancy of ribosomal small subunits in a vertebrate.,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03,,,Shield 4150NT,SAMEA5752548,Computational Biology Unit,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|External Id:SAMEA5752548|INSDC center name:Computational Biology Unit|INSDC first public:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|INSDC last update:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:11|common name:zebrafish|dev stage:Shield|sample name:11|scientific name:Danio rerio,,,,,,,,,NextSeq 500 sequencing,ena EXPERIMENT Computational Biology Unit 27 01 2020 16:24:36:406 8,Shield 150NT,OTHER,RNA Seq,,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,other,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,NextSeq 500,,ERP116106,NextSeq 500 sequencing,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2020 02 14,,,1188343980.0,15636105.0,ena RUN Computational Biology Unit 27 01 2020 16:24:36:406 8,0:76,A:580658556;C:223116826;G:260847322;T:123709681;N:11595,76,,,,580658556,223116826,260847322,123709681,11595,ERX3854560,ERS3556007,ERA2359305,Computational Biology Unit|European Nucleotide Archive,Computational Biology Unit,1,0.27037,,0.13972,,0.97392,,0.39459,,76,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,nextseq,unknown,other,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Unknown,2019-07-03,Gastrula,Embryo,Undetermined,Embryo Imprecise
9722,ERR3841997,ERX3854559,ERS3556004,ERP116106,PRJEB33323,Deconstructing the individual steps of vertebrate translation initiation,ena-STUDY-Computational Biology Unit-03-07-2019-10:11:34:314-422,Other,In eukaryotes  the number of ribosomes synthesizing a given protein depends on how many are recruited to its mRNA  their success in navigating its five prime untranslated region UTR and whether they recognize its start codon. Initiation of translation is a rate limiting step in protein synthesis and key to gene expression control 1  but despite this centrality it remains poorly understood 2 3. Here we introduce ribosome complex profiling RCP seq to capture the transcriptome wide occupancy of scanning  initiating  elongating and terminating ribosome complexes in a higher eukaryote. We track scanning and elongating ribosomes across all five prime UTRs in zebrafish  which enable us to assess the individual regulatory contributions from the three stages of initiation: ribosome recruitment  scanning of the five prime UTR and recognition of the start codon. Our data sheds light on small subunit recruitment to mRNAs presenting evidence for the threading model and demonstrates that sequence features regulate this recruitment. We estimate the processivity of scanning ribosomes as they traverse the five prime UTR and show that the repressive effects of upstream open reading frames depend on the efficiency of both translation initiation and termination. Finally  we determine the optimal initiation contexts by directly estimating the conversion of scanning to elongating ribosomes and demonstrate specific regulation of translation initiation at the endoplasmic reticulum. Our results open for the possibility of deconvoluting translation initiation into separate stages and provides the first view of global occupancy of ribosomal small subunits in a vertebrate.,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03,,,Shield 1,SAMEA5752545,Computational Biology Unit,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|External Id:SAMEA5752545|INSDC center name:Computational Biology Unit|INSDC first public:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|INSDC last update:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:8|common name:zebrafish|dev stage:Shield|sample name:8|scientific name:Danio rerio,,,,,,,,,NextSeq 500 sequencing,ena EXPERIMENT Computational Biology Unit 27 01 2020 16:24:36:406 7,Shield 1,OTHER,RNA Seq,,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,other,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,NextSeq 500,,ERP116106,NextSeq 500 sequencing,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2020 02 14,,,1278891444.0,16827519.0,ena RUN Computational Biology Unit 27 01 2020 16:24:36:406 7,0:76,A:571738369;C:256385478;G:295145281;T:155610082;N:12234,76,,,,571738369,256385478,295145281,155610082,12234,ERX3854559,ERS3556004,ERA2359305,Computational Biology Unit|European Nucleotide Archive,Computational Biology Unit,1,0.23116,,0.11137,,0.97932,,0.45978,,76,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,nextseq,unknown,other,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Unknown,2019-07-03,Gastrula,Embryo,Undetermined,Embryo Imprecise
9723,ERR3841996,ERX3854558,ERS3556001,ERP116106,PRJEB33323,Deconstructing the individual steps of vertebrate translation initiation,ena-STUDY-Computational Biology Unit-03-07-2019-10:11:34:314-422,Other,In eukaryotes  the number of ribosomes synthesizing a given protein depends on how many are recruited to its mRNA  their success in navigating its five prime untranslated region UTR and whether they recognize its start codon. Initiation of translation is a rate limiting step in protein synthesis and key to gene expression control 1  but despite this centrality it remains poorly understood 2 3. Here we introduce ribosome complex profiling RCP seq to capture the transcriptome wide occupancy of scanning  initiating  elongating and terminating ribosome complexes in a higher eukaryote. We track scanning and elongating ribosomes across all five prime UTRs in zebrafish  which enable us to assess the individual regulatory contributions from the three stages of initiation: ribosome recruitment  scanning of the five prime UTR and recognition of the start codon. Our data sheds light on small subunit recruitment to mRNAs presenting evidence for the threading model and demonstrates that sequence features regulate this recruitment. We estimate the processivity of scanning ribosomes as they traverse the five prime UTR and show that the repressive effects of upstream open reading frames depend on the efficiency of both translation initiation and termination. Finally  we determine the optimal initiation contexts by directly estimating the conversion of scanning to elongating ribosomes and demonstrate specific regulation of translation initiation at the endoplasmic reticulum. Our results open for the possibility of deconvoluting translation initiation into separate stages and provides the first view of global occupancy of ribosomal small subunits in a vertebrate.,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03,,,Sphere 3,SAMEA5752542,Computational Biology Unit,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|External Id:SAMEA5752542|INSDC center name:Computational Biology Unit|INSDC first public:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|INSDC last update:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:5|common name:zebrafish|dev stage:Sphere|sample name:5|scientific name:Danio rerio,,,,,,,,,NextSeq 500 sequencing,ena EXPERIMENT Computational Biology Unit 27 01 2020 16:24:36:406 6,Sphere 3,OTHER,RNA Seq,,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,other,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,NextSeq 500,,ERP116106,NextSeq 500 sequencing,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2020 02 14,,,1439954368.0,18946768.0,ena RUN Computational Biology Unit 27 01 2020 16:24:36:406 6,0:76,A:669362698;C:280496524;G:316727778;T:173353505;N:13863,76,,,,669362698,280496524,316727778,173353505,13863,ERX3854558,ERS3556001,ERA2359305,Computational Biology Unit|European Nucleotide Archive,Computational Biology Unit,1,0.26155,,0.12068,,0.96915,,0.45719,,76,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,nextseq,unknown,other,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Unknown,2019-07-03,Blastula,Embryo,Undetermined,Embryo Imprecise
9724,ERR3841995,ERX3854557,ERS3556000,ERP116106,PRJEB33323,Deconstructing the individual steps of vertebrate translation initiation,ena-STUDY-Computational Biology Unit-03-07-2019-10:11:34:314-422,Other,In eukaryotes  the number of ribosomes synthesizing a given protein depends on how many are recruited to its mRNA  their success in navigating its five prime untranslated region UTR and whether they recognize its start codon. Initiation of translation is a rate limiting step in protein synthesis and key to gene expression control 1  but despite this centrality it remains poorly understood 2 3. Here we introduce ribosome complex profiling RCP seq to capture the transcriptome wide occupancy of scanning  initiating  elongating and terminating ribosome complexes in a higher eukaryote. We track scanning and elongating ribosomes across all five prime UTRs in zebrafish  which enable us to assess the individual regulatory contributions from the three stages of initiation: ribosome recruitment  scanning of the five prime UTR and recognition of the start codon. Our data sheds light on small subunit recruitment to mRNAs presenting evidence for the threading model and demonstrates that sequence features regulate this recruitment. We estimate the processivity of scanning ribosomes as they traverse the five prime UTR and show that the repressive effects of upstream open reading frames depend on the efficiency of both translation initiation and termination. Finally  we determine the optimal initiation contexts by directly estimating the conversion of scanning to elongating ribosomes and demonstrate specific regulation of translation initiation at the endoplasmic reticulum. Our results open for the possibility of deconvoluting translation initiation into separate stages and provides the first view of global occupancy of ribosomal small subunits in a vertebrate.,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03,,,Sphere 2,SAMEA5752541,Computational Biology Unit,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|External Id:SAMEA5752541|INSDC center name:Computational Biology Unit|INSDC first public:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|INSDC last update:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:4|common name:zebrafish|dev stage:Sphere|sample name:4|scientific name:Danio rerio,,,,,,,,,NextSeq 500 sequencing,ena EXPERIMENT Computational Biology Unit 27 01 2020 16:24:36:406 5,Sphere 2,OTHER,RNA Seq,,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,other,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,NextSeq 500,,ERP116106,NextSeq 500 sequencing,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2020 02 14,,,1592272200.0,20950950.0,ena RUN Computational Biology Unit 27 01 2020 16:24:36:406 5,0:76,A:757507948;C:308394094;G:342142775;T:184211881;N:15502,76,,,,757507948,308394094,342142775,184211881,15502,ERX3854557,ERS3556000,ERA2359305,Computational Biology Unit|European Nucleotide Archive,Computational Biology Unit,1,0.22483,,0.10923,,0.97646,,0.49458,,76,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,nextseq,unknown,other,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Unknown,2019-07-03,Blastula,Embryo,Undetermined,Embryo Imprecise
9725,ERR3841994,ERX3854556,ERS3555999,ERP116106,PRJEB33323,Deconstructing the individual steps of vertebrate translation initiation,ena-STUDY-Computational Biology Unit-03-07-2019-10:11:34:314-422,Other,In eukaryotes  the number of ribosomes synthesizing a given protein depends on how many are recruited to its mRNA  their success in navigating its five prime untranslated region UTR and whether they recognize its start codon. Initiation of translation is a rate limiting step in protein synthesis and key to gene expression control 1  but despite this centrality it remains poorly understood 2 3. Here we introduce ribosome complex profiling RCP seq to capture the transcriptome wide occupancy of scanning  initiating  elongating and terminating ribosome complexes in a higher eukaryote. We track scanning and elongating ribosomes across all five prime UTRs in zebrafish  which enable us to assess the individual regulatory contributions from the three stages of initiation: ribosome recruitment  scanning of the five prime UTR and recognition of the start codon. Our data sheds light on small subunit recruitment to mRNAs presenting evidence for the threading model and demonstrates that sequence features regulate this recruitment. We estimate the processivity of scanning ribosomes as they traverse the five prime UTR and show that the repressive effects of upstream open reading frames depend on the efficiency of both translation initiation and termination. Finally  we determine the optimal initiation contexts by directly estimating the conversion of scanning to elongating ribosomes and demonstrate specific regulation of translation initiation at the endoplasmic reticulum. Our results open for the possibility of deconvoluting translation initiation into separate stages and provides the first view of global occupancy of ribosomal small subunits in a vertebrate.,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03,,,Sphere 1,SAMEA5752540,Computational Biology Unit,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|External Id:SAMEA5752540|INSDC center name:Computational Biology Unit|INSDC first public:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|INSDC last update:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:3|common name:zebrafish|dev stage:Sphere|sample name:3|scientific name:Danio rerio,,,,,,,,,NextSeq 500 sequencing,ena EXPERIMENT Computational Biology Unit 27 01 2020 16:24:36:406 4,Sphere 1,OTHER,RNA Seq,,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,other,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,NextSeq 500,,ERP116106,NextSeq 500 sequencing,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2020 02 14,,,1332363676.0,17531101.0,ena RUN Computational Biology Unit 27 01 2020 16:24:36:406 4,0:76,A:529354355;C:299445923;G:318745973;T:184804260;N:13165,76,,,,529354355,299445923,318745973,184804260,13165,ERX3854556,ERS3555999,ERA2359305,Computational Biology Unit|European Nucleotide Archive,Computational Biology Unit,1,0.21197,,0.0829,,0.98196,,0.55753,,76,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,nextseq,unknown,other,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Unknown,2019-07-03,Blastula,Embryo,Undetermined,Embryo Imprecise
9726,ERR3841993,ERX3854555,ERS3555998,ERP116106,PRJEB33323,Deconstructing the individual steps of vertebrate translation initiation,ena-STUDY-Computational Biology Unit-03-07-2019-10:11:34:314-422,Other,In eukaryotes  the number of ribosomes synthesizing a given protein depends on how many are recruited to its mRNA  their success in navigating its five prime untranslated region UTR and whether they recognize its start codon. Initiation of translation is a rate limiting step in protein synthesis and key to gene expression control 1  but despite this centrality it remains poorly understood 2 3. Here we introduce ribosome complex profiling RCP seq to capture the transcriptome wide occupancy of scanning  initiating  elongating and terminating ribosome complexes in a higher eukaryote. We track scanning and elongating ribosomes across all five prime UTRs in zebrafish  which enable us to assess the individual regulatory contributions from the three stages of initiation: ribosome recruitment  scanning of the five prime UTR and recognition of the start codon. Our data sheds light on small subunit recruitment to mRNAs presenting evidence for the threading model and demonstrates that sequence features regulate this recruitment. We estimate the processivity of scanning ribosomes as they traverse the five prime UTR and show that the repressive effects of upstream open reading frames depend on the efficiency of both translation initiation and termination. Finally  we determine the optimal initiation contexts by directly estimating the conversion of scanning to elongating ribosomes and demonstrate specific regulation of translation initiation at the endoplasmic reticulum. Our results open for the possibility of deconvoluting translation initiation into separate stages and provides the first view of global occupancy of ribosomal small subunits in a vertebrate.,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03,,,64 cell 2,SAMEA5752539,Computational Biology Unit,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|External Id:SAMEA5752539|INSDC center name:Computational Biology Unit|INSDC first public:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|INSDC last update:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:2|common name:zebrafish|dev stage:64 cell|sample name:2|scientific name:Danio rerio,,,,,,,,,NextSeq 500 sequencing,ena EXPERIMENT Computational Biology Unit 27 01 2020 16:24:36:406 3,64 cell 3,OTHER,RNA Seq,,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,other,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,NextSeq 500,,ERP116106,NextSeq 500 sequencing,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2020 02 14,,,1579307816.0,20780366.0,ena RUN Computational Biology Unit 27 01 2020 16:24:36:406 3,0:76,A:589876602;C:380048242;G:392473318;T:216893826;N:15828,76,,,,589876602,380048242,392473318,216893826,15828,ERX3854555,ERS3555998,ERA2359305,Computational Biology Unit|European Nucleotide Archive,Computational Biology Unit,1,0.15411,,0.04564,,0.97883,,0.55376,,76,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,nextseq,unknown,other,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Unknown,2019-07-03,Cleavage,Embryo,Undetermined,Embryo Imprecise
9727,ERR3841992,ERX3854554,ERS3556003,ERP116106,PRJEB33323,Deconstructing the individual steps of vertebrate translation initiation,ena-STUDY-Computational Biology Unit-03-07-2019-10:11:34:314-422,Other,In eukaryotes  the number of ribosomes synthesizing a given protein depends on how many are recruited to its mRNA  their success in navigating its five prime untranslated region UTR and whether they recognize its start codon. Initiation of translation is a rate limiting step in protein synthesis and key to gene expression control 1  but despite this centrality it remains poorly understood 2 3. Here we introduce ribosome complex profiling RCP seq to capture the transcriptome wide occupancy of scanning  initiating  elongating and terminating ribosome complexes in a higher eukaryote. We track scanning and elongating ribosomes across all five prime UTRs in zebrafish  which enable us to assess the individual regulatory contributions from the three stages of initiation: ribosome recruitment  scanning of the five prime UTR and recognition of the start codon. Our data sheds light on small subunit recruitment to mRNAs presenting evidence for the threading model and demonstrates that sequence features regulate this recruitment. We estimate the processivity of scanning ribosomes as they traverse the five prime UTR and show that the repressive effects of upstream open reading frames depend on the efficiency of both translation initiation and termination. Finally  we determine the optimal initiation contexts by directly estimating the conversion of scanning to elongating ribosomes and demonstrate specific regulation of translation initiation at the endoplasmic reticulum. Our results open for the possibility of deconvoluting translation initiation into separate stages and provides the first view of global occupancy of ribosomal small subunits in a vertebrate.,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03,,,64 cell 4Ei 10,SAMEA5752544,Computational Biology Unit,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|External Id:SAMEA5752544|INSDC center name:Computational Biology Unit|INSDC first public:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|INSDC last update:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:7|common name:zebrafish|dev stage:64 cell|sample name:7|scientific name:Danio rerio,,,,,,,,,NextSeq 500 sequencing,ena EXPERIMENT Computational Biology Unit 27 01 2020 16:24:36:406 2,64 cell 4Ei,OTHER,RNA Seq,,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,other,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,NextSeq 500,,ERP116106,NextSeq 500 sequencing,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2020 02 14,,,1213585480.0,15968230.0,ena RUN Computational Biology Unit 27 01 2020 16:24:36:406 2,0:76,A:548456563;C:244465528;G:271963808;T:148687764;N:11817,76,,,,548456563,244465528,271963808,148687764,11817,ERX3854554,ERS3556003,ERA2359305,Computational Biology Unit|European Nucleotide Archive,Computational Biology Unit,1,0.21973,,0.10926,,0.97419,,0.44348,,76,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,nextseq,unknown,other,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Unknown,2019-07-03,Cleavage,Embryo,Undetermined,Embryo Imprecise
9728,ERR3841991,ERX3854553,ERS3555997,ERP116106,PRJEB33323,Deconstructing the individual steps of vertebrate translation initiation,ena-STUDY-Computational Biology Unit-03-07-2019-10:11:34:314-422,Other,In eukaryotes  the number of ribosomes synthesizing a given protein depends on how many are recruited to its mRNA  their success in navigating its five prime untranslated region UTR and whether they recognize its start codon. Initiation of translation is a rate limiting step in protein synthesis and key to gene expression control 1  but despite this centrality it remains poorly understood 2 3. Here we introduce ribosome complex profiling RCP seq to capture the transcriptome wide occupancy of scanning  initiating  elongating and terminating ribosome complexes in a higher eukaryote. We track scanning and elongating ribosomes across all five prime UTRs in zebrafish  which enable us to assess the individual regulatory contributions from the three stages of initiation: ribosome recruitment  scanning of the five prime UTR and recognition of the start codon. Our data sheds light on small subunit recruitment to mRNAs presenting evidence for the threading model and demonstrates that sequence features regulate this recruitment. We estimate the processivity of scanning ribosomes as they traverse the five prime UTR and show that the repressive effects of upstream open reading frames depend on the efficiency of both translation initiation and termination. Finally  we determine the optimal initiation contexts by directly estimating the conversion of scanning to elongating ribosomes and demonstrate specific regulation of translation initiation at the endoplasmic reticulum. Our results open for the possibility of deconvoluting translation initiation into separate stages and provides the first view of global occupancy of ribosomal small subunits in a vertebrate.,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03,,,64 cell 1,SAMEA5752538,Computational Biology Unit,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|External Id:SAMEA5752538|INSDC center name:Computational Biology Unit|INSDC first public:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|INSDC last update:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:1|common name:zebrafish|dev stage:64 cell|sample name:1|scientific name:Danio rerio,,,,,,,,,NextSeq 500 sequencing,ena EXPERIMENT Computational Biology Unit 27 01 2020 16:24:36:405 1,64 cell 1,OTHER,RNA Seq,,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,other,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,NextSeq 500,,ERP116106,NextSeq 500 sequencing,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2020 02 14,,,1494930944.0,19670144.0,ena RUN Computational Biology Unit 27 01 2020 16:24:36:406 1,0:76,A:543017836;C:366974203;G:367027373;T:217896401;N:15131,76,,,,543017836,366974203,367027373,217896401,15131,ERX3854553,ERS3555997,ERA2359305,Computational Biology Unit|European Nucleotide Archive,Computational Biology Unit,1,0.2544,,0.08957,,0.96568,,0.55681,,76,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,nextseq,unknown,other,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Unknown,2019-07-03,Cleavage,Embryo,Undetermined,Embryo Imprecise
9729,ERR3489881,ERX3511296,ERS3556004,ERP116106,PRJEB33323,Deconstructing the individual steps of vertebrate translation initiation,ena-STUDY-Computational Biology Unit-03-07-2019-10:11:34:314-422,Other,In eukaryotes  the number of ribosomes synthesizing a given protein depends on how many are recruited to its mRNA  their success in navigating its five prime untranslated region UTR and whether they recognize its start codon. Initiation of translation is a rate limiting step in protein synthesis and key to gene expression control 1  but despite this centrality it remains poorly understood 2 3. Here we introduce ribosome complex profiling RCP seq to capture the transcriptome wide occupancy of scanning  initiating  elongating and terminating ribosome complexes in a higher eukaryote. We track scanning and elongating ribosomes across all five prime UTRs in zebrafish  which enable us to assess the individual regulatory contributions from the three stages of initiation: ribosome recruitment  scanning of the five prime UTR and recognition of the start codon. Our data sheds light on small subunit recruitment to mRNAs presenting evidence for the threading model and demonstrates that sequence features regulate this recruitment. We estimate the processivity of scanning ribosomes as they traverse the five prime UTR and show that the repressive effects of upstream open reading frames depend on the efficiency of both translation initiation and termination. Finally  we determine the optimal initiation contexts by directly estimating the conversion of scanning to elongating ribosomes and demonstrate specific regulation of translation initiation at the endoplasmic reticulum. Our results open for the possibility of deconvoluting translation initiation into separate stages and provides the first view of global occupancy of ribosomal small subunits in a vertebrate.,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03,,,Shield 1,SAMEA5752545,Computational Biology Unit,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|External Id:SAMEA5752545|INSDC center name:Computational Biology Unit|INSDC first public:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|INSDC last update:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:8|common name:zebrafish|dev stage:Shield|sample name:8|scientific name:Danio rerio,,,,,,,,,NextSeq 500 sequencing,ena EXPERIMENT Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 33,Shield 1 F20,None,RCP seq,,OTHER,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,other,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,NextSeq 500,,ERP116106,NextSeq 500 sequencing,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 08 22,,,975578636.0,12836561.0,ena RUN Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 33,0:76,A:398325549;C:237563934;G:230721299;T:108957698;N:10156,76,,,,398325549,237563934,230721299,108957698,10156,ERX3511296,ERS3556004,ERA2100634,Computational Biology Unit|European Nucleotide Archive,Computational Biology Unit,1,0.33102,,0.19766,,0.99918,,0.12812,,76,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,nextseq,unknown,other,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Unknown,2019-07-03,Gastrula,Embryo,Undetermined,Embryo Imprecise
9730,ERR3489880,ERX3511295,ERS3556004,ERP116106,PRJEB33323,Deconstructing the individual steps of vertebrate translation initiation,ena-STUDY-Computational Biology Unit-03-07-2019-10:11:34:314-422,Other,In eukaryotes  the number of ribosomes synthesizing a given protein depends on how many are recruited to its mRNA  their success in navigating its five prime untranslated region UTR and whether they recognize its start codon. Initiation of translation is a rate limiting step in protein synthesis and key to gene expression control 1  but despite this centrality it remains poorly understood 2 3. Here we introduce ribosome complex profiling RCP seq to capture the transcriptome wide occupancy of scanning  initiating  elongating and terminating ribosome complexes in a higher eukaryote. We track scanning and elongating ribosomes across all five prime UTRs in zebrafish  which enable us to assess the individual regulatory contributions from the three stages of initiation: ribosome recruitment  scanning of the five prime UTR and recognition of the start codon. Our data sheds light on small subunit recruitment to mRNAs presenting evidence for the threading model and demonstrates that sequence features regulate this recruitment. We estimate the processivity of scanning ribosomes as they traverse the five prime UTR and show that the repressive effects of upstream open reading frames depend on the efficiency of both translation initiation and termination. Finally  we determine the optimal initiation contexts by directly estimating the conversion of scanning to elongating ribosomes and demonstrate specific regulation of translation initiation at the endoplasmic reticulum. Our results open for the possibility of deconvoluting translation initiation into separate stages and provides the first view of global occupancy of ribosomal small subunits in a vertebrate.,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03,,,Shield 1,SAMEA5752545,Computational Biology Unit,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|External Id:SAMEA5752545|INSDC center name:Computational Biology Unit|INSDC first public:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|INSDC last update:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:8|common name:zebrafish|dev stage:Shield|sample name:8|scientific name:Danio rerio,,,,,,,,,NextSeq 500 sequencing,ena EXPERIMENT Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 32,Shield 1 F19,None,RCP seq,,OTHER,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,other,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,NextSeq 500,,ERP116106,NextSeq 500 sequencing,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 08 22,,,931166668.0,12252193.0,ena RUN Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 32,0:76,A:271081669;C:253947035;G:272354427;T:133774815;N:8722,76,,,,271081669,253947035,272354427,133774815,8722,ERX3511295,ERS3556004,ERA2100634,Computational Biology Unit|European Nucleotide Archive,Computational Biology Unit,1,0.15598,,0.10707,,0.99902,,0.47314,,76,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,nextseq,unknown,other,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Unknown,2019-07-03,Gastrula,Embryo,Undetermined,Embryo Imprecise
9731,ERR3489879,ERX3511294,ERS3556004,ERP116106,PRJEB33323,Deconstructing the individual steps of vertebrate translation initiation,ena-STUDY-Computational Biology Unit-03-07-2019-10:11:34:314-422,Other,In eukaryotes  the number of ribosomes synthesizing a given protein depends on how many are recruited to its mRNA  their success in navigating its five prime untranslated region UTR and whether they recognize its start codon. Initiation of translation is a rate limiting step in protein synthesis and key to gene expression control 1  but despite this centrality it remains poorly understood 2 3. Here we introduce ribosome complex profiling RCP seq to capture the transcriptome wide occupancy of scanning  initiating  elongating and terminating ribosome complexes in a higher eukaryote. We track scanning and elongating ribosomes across all five prime UTRs in zebrafish  which enable us to assess the individual regulatory contributions from the three stages of initiation: ribosome recruitment  scanning of the five prime UTR and recognition of the start codon. Our data sheds light on small subunit recruitment to mRNAs presenting evidence for the threading model and demonstrates that sequence features regulate this recruitment. We estimate the processivity of scanning ribosomes as they traverse the five prime UTR and show that the repressive effects of upstream open reading frames depend on the efficiency of both translation initiation and termination. Finally  we determine the optimal initiation contexts by directly estimating the conversion of scanning to elongating ribosomes and demonstrate specific regulation of translation initiation at the endoplasmic reticulum. Our results open for the possibility of deconvoluting translation initiation into separate stages and provides the first view of global occupancy of ribosomal small subunits in a vertebrate.,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03,,,Shield 1,SAMEA5752545,Computational Biology Unit,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|External Id:SAMEA5752545|INSDC center name:Computational Biology Unit|INSDC first public:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|INSDC last update:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:8|common name:zebrafish|dev stage:Shield|sample name:8|scientific name:Danio rerio,,,,,,,,,NextSeq 500 sequencing,ena EXPERIMENT Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 31,Shield 1 F18,None,RCP seq,,OTHER,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,other,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,NextSeq 500,,ERP116106,NextSeq 500 sequencing,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 08 22,,,1506513268.0,19822543.0,ena RUN Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 31,0:76,A:493273515;C:456544968;G:391677033;T:165002559;N:15193,76,,,,493273515,456544968,391677033,165002559,15193,ERX3511294,ERS3556004,ERA2100634,Computational Biology Unit|European Nucleotide Archive,Computational Biology Unit,1,0.01562,,0.0053,,0.99908,,0.8127,,76,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,nextseq,unknown,other,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Unknown,2019-07-03,Gastrula,Embryo,Undetermined,Embryo Imprecise
9732,ERR3489878,ERX3511293,ERS3556004,ERP116106,PRJEB33323,Deconstructing the individual steps of vertebrate translation initiation,ena-STUDY-Computational Biology Unit-03-07-2019-10:11:34:314-422,Other,In eukaryotes  the number of ribosomes synthesizing a given protein depends on how many are recruited to its mRNA  their success in navigating its five prime untranslated region UTR and whether they recognize its start codon. Initiation of translation is a rate limiting step in protein synthesis and key to gene expression control 1  but despite this centrality it remains poorly understood 2 3. Here we introduce ribosome complex profiling RCP seq to capture the transcriptome wide occupancy of scanning  initiating  elongating and terminating ribosome complexes in a higher eukaryote. We track scanning and elongating ribosomes across all five prime UTRs in zebrafish  which enable us to assess the individual regulatory contributions from the three stages of initiation: ribosome recruitment  scanning of the five prime UTR and recognition of the start codon. Our data sheds light on small subunit recruitment to mRNAs presenting evidence for the threading model and demonstrates that sequence features regulate this recruitment. We estimate the processivity of scanning ribosomes as they traverse the five prime UTR and show that the repressive effects of upstream open reading frames depend on the efficiency of both translation initiation and termination. Finally  we determine the optimal initiation contexts by directly estimating the conversion of scanning to elongating ribosomes and demonstrate specific regulation of translation initiation at the endoplasmic reticulum. Our results open for the possibility of deconvoluting translation initiation into separate stages and provides the first view of global occupancy of ribosomal small subunits in a vertebrate.,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03,,,Shield 1,SAMEA5752545,Computational Biology Unit,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|External Id:SAMEA5752545|INSDC center name:Computational Biology Unit|INSDC first public:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|INSDC last update:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:8|common name:zebrafish|dev stage:Shield|sample name:8|scientific name:Danio rerio,,,,,,,,,NextSeq 500 sequencing,ena EXPERIMENT Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 30,Shield 1 F17,None,RCP seq,,OTHER,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,other,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,NextSeq 500,,ERP116106,NextSeq 500 sequencing,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 08 22,,,1259456496.0,16571796.0,ena RUN Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 30,0:76,A:471473123;C:333726472;G:302016190;T:152228002;N:12709,76,,,,471473123,333726472,302016190,152228002,12709,ERX3511293,ERS3556004,ERA2100634,Computational Biology Unit|European Nucleotide Archive,Computational Biology Unit,1,0.18339,,0.12544,,0.99928,,0.22368,,76,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,nextseq,unknown,other,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Unknown,2019-07-03,Gastrula,Embryo,Undetermined,Embryo Imprecise
9733,ERR3489877,ERX3511292,ERS3556004,ERP116106,PRJEB33323,Deconstructing the individual steps of vertebrate translation initiation,ena-STUDY-Computational Biology Unit-03-07-2019-10:11:34:314-422,Other,In eukaryotes  the number of ribosomes synthesizing a given protein depends on how many are recruited to its mRNA  their success in navigating its five prime untranslated region UTR and whether they recognize its start codon. Initiation of translation is a rate limiting step in protein synthesis and key to gene expression control 1  but despite this centrality it remains poorly understood 2 3. Here we introduce ribosome complex profiling RCP seq to capture the transcriptome wide occupancy of scanning  initiating  elongating and terminating ribosome complexes in a higher eukaryote. We track scanning and elongating ribosomes across all five prime UTRs in zebrafish  which enable us to assess the individual regulatory contributions from the three stages of initiation: ribosome recruitment  scanning of the five prime UTR and recognition of the start codon. Our data sheds light on small subunit recruitment to mRNAs presenting evidence for the threading model and demonstrates that sequence features regulate this recruitment. We estimate the processivity of scanning ribosomes as they traverse the five prime UTR and show that the repressive effects of upstream open reading frames depend on the efficiency of both translation initiation and termination. Finally  we determine the optimal initiation contexts by directly estimating the conversion of scanning to elongating ribosomes and demonstrate specific regulation of translation initiation at the endoplasmic reticulum. Our results open for the possibility of deconvoluting translation initiation into separate stages and provides the first view of global occupancy of ribosomal small subunits in a vertebrate.,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03,,,Shield 1,SAMEA5752545,Computational Biology Unit,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|External Id:SAMEA5752545|INSDC center name:Computational Biology Unit|INSDC first public:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|INSDC last update:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:8|common name:zebrafish|dev stage:Shield|sample name:8|scientific name:Danio rerio,,,,,,,,,NextSeq 500 sequencing,ena EXPERIMENT Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 29,Shield 1 F16,None,RCP seq,,OTHER,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,other,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,NextSeq 500,,ERP116106,NextSeq 500 sequencing,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 08 22,,,1364615872.0,17955472.0,ena RUN Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 29,0:76,A:539462776;C:341141880;G:314571683;T:169426048;N:13485,76,,,,539462776,341141880,314571683,169426048,13485,ERX3511292,ERS3556004,ERA2100634,Computational Biology Unit|European Nucleotide Archive,Computational Biology Unit,1,0.11663,,0.07319,,0.99939,,0.25377,,76,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,nextseq,unknown,other,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Unknown,2019-07-03,Gastrula,Embryo,Undetermined,Embryo Imprecise
9734,ERR3489876,ERX3511291,ERS3556004,ERP116106,PRJEB33323,Deconstructing the individual steps of vertebrate translation initiation,ena-STUDY-Computational Biology Unit-03-07-2019-10:11:34:314-422,Other,In eukaryotes  the number of ribosomes synthesizing a given protein depends on how many are recruited to its mRNA  their success in navigating its five prime untranslated region UTR and whether they recognize its start codon. Initiation of translation is a rate limiting step in protein synthesis and key to gene expression control 1  but despite this centrality it remains poorly understood 2 3. Here we introduce ribosome complex profiling RCP seq to capture the transcriptome wide occupancy of scanning  initiating  elongating and terminating ribosome complexes in a higher eukaryote. We track scanning and elongating ribosomes across all five prime UTRs in zebrafish  which enable us to assess the individual regulatory contributions from the three stages of initiation: ribosome recruitment  scanning of the five prime UTR and recognition of the start codon. Our data sheds light on small subunit recruitment to mRNAs presenting evidence for the threading model and demonstrates that sequence features regulate this recruitment. We estimate the processivity of scanning ribosomes as they traverse the five prime UTR and show that the repressive effects of upstream open reading frames depend on the efficiency of both translation initiation and termination. Finally  we determine the optimal initiation contexts by directly estimating the conversion of scanning to elongating ribosomes and demonstrate specific regulation of translation initiation at the endoplasmic reticulum. Our results open for the possibility of deconvoluting translation initiation into separate stages and provides the first view of global occupancy of ribosomal small subunits in a vertebrate.,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03,,,Shield 1,SAMEA5752545,Computational Biology Unit,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|External Id:SAMEA5752545|INSDC center name:Computational Biology Unit|INSDC first public:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|INSDC last update:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:8|common name:zebrafish|dev stage:Shield|sample name:8|scientific name:Danio rerio,,,,,,,,,NextSeq 500 sequencing,ena EXPERIMENT Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 28,Shield 1 F15,None,RCP seq,,OTHER,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,other,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,NextSeq 500,,ERP116106,NextSeq 500 sequencing,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 08 22,,,952605888.0,12534288.0,ena RUN Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 28,0:76,A:414133320;C:219437277;G:207418049;T:111607418;N:9824,76,,,,414133320,219437277,207418049,111607418,9824,ERX3511291,ERS3556004,ERA2100634,Computational Biology Unit|European Nucleotide Archive,Computational Biology Unit,1,0.17603,,0.10972,,0.99935,,0.13311,,76,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,nextseq,unknown,other,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Unknown,2019-07-03,Gastrula,Embryo,Undetermined,Embryo Imprecise
9735,ERR3489875,ERX3511290,ERS3556004,ERP116106,PRJEB33323,Deconstructing the individual steps of vertebrate translation initiation,ena-STUDY-Computational Biology Unit-03-07-2019-10:11:34:314-422,Other,In eukaryotes  the number of ribosomes synthesizing a given protein depends on how many are recruited to its mRNA  their success in navigating its five prime untranslated region UTR and whether they recognize its start codon. Initiation of translation is a rate limiting step in protein synthesis and key to gene expression control 1  but despite this centrality it remains poorly understood 2 3. Here we introduce ribosome complex profiling RCP seq to capture the transcriptome wide occupancy of scanning  initiating  elongating and terminating ribosome complexes in a higher eukaryote. We track scanning and elongating ribosomes across all five prime UTRs in zebrafish  which enable us to assess the individual regulatory contributions from the three stages of initiation: ribosome recruitment  scanning of the five prime UTR and recognition of the start codon. Our data sheds light on small subunit recruitment to mRNAs presenting evidence for the threading model and demonstrates that sequence features regulate this recruitment. We estimate the processivity of scanning ribosomes as they traverse the five prime UTR and show that the repressive effects of upstream open reading frames depend on the efficiency of both translation initiation and termination. Finally  we determine the optimal initiation contexts by directly estimating the conversion of scanning to elongating ribosomes and demonstrate specific regulation of translation initiation at the endoplasmic reticulum. Our results open for the possibility of deconvoluting translation initiation into separate stages and provides the first view of global occupancy of ribosomal small subunits in a vertebrate.,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03,,,Shield 1,SAMEA5752545,Computational Biology Unit,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|External Id:SAMEA5752545|INSDC center name:Computational Biology Unit|INSDC first public:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|INSDC last update:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:8|common name:zebrafish|dev stage:Shield|sample name:8|scientific name:Danio rerio,,,,,,,,,NextSeq 500 sequencing,ena EXPERIMENT Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 27,Shield 1 F14,None,RCP seq,,OTHER,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,other,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,NextSeq 500,,ERP116106,NextSeq 500 sequencing,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 08 22,,,870952628.0,11459903.0,ena RUN Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 27,0:76,A:357710338;C:221475453;G:191231014;T:100526675;N:9148,76,,,,357710338,221475453,191231014,100526675,9148,ERX3511290,ERS3556004,ERA2100634,Computational Biology Unit|European Nucleotide Archive,Computational Biology Unit,1,0.1248,,0.06422,,0.99896,,0.34819,,76,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,nextseq,unknown,other,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Unknown,2019-07-03,Gastrula,Embryo,Undetermined,Embryo Imprecise
9736,ERR3489874,ERX3511289,ERS3556004,ERP116106,PRJEB33323,Deconstructing the individual steps of vertebrate translation initiation,ena-STUDY-Computational Biology Unit-03-07-2019-10:11:34:314-422,Other,In eukaryotes  the number of ribosomes synthesizing a given protein depends on how many are recruited to its mRNA  their success in navigating its five prime untranslated region UTR and whether they recognize its start codon. Initiation of translation is a rate limiting step in protein synthesis and key to gene expression control 1  but despite this centrality it remains poorly understood 2 3. Here we introduce ribosome complex profiling RCP seq to capture the transcriptome wide occupancy of scanning  initiating  elongating and terminating ribosome complexes in a higher eukaryote. We track scanning and elongating ribosomes across all five prime UTRs in zebrafish  which enable us to assess the individual regulatory contributions from the three stages of initiation: ribosome recruitment  scanning of the five prime UTR and recognition of the start codon. Our data sheds light on small subunit recruitment to mRNAs presenting evidence for the threading model and demonstrates that sequence features regulate this recruitment. We estimate the processivity of scanning ribosomes as they traverse the five prime UTR and show that the repressive effects of upstream open reading frames depend on the efficiency of both translation initiation and termination. Finally  we determine the optimal initiation contexts by directly estimating the conversion of scanning to elongating ribosomes and demonstrate specific regulation of translation initiation at the endoplasmic reticulum. Our results open for the possibility of deconvoluting translation initiation into separate stages and provides the first view of global occupancy of ribosomal small subunits in a vertebrate.,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03,,,Shield 1,SAMEA5752545,Computational Biology Unit,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|External Id:SAMEA5752545|INSDC center name:Computational Biology Unit|INSDC first public:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|INSDC last update:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:8|common name:zebrafish|dev stage:Shield|sample name:8|scientific name:Danio rerio,,,,,,,,,NextSeq 500 sequencing,ena EXPERIMENT Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 26,Shield 1 F13,None,RCP seq,,OTHER,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,other,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,NextSeq 500,,ERP116106,NextSeq 500 sequencing,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 08 22,,,981672620.0,12916745.0,ena RUN Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 26,0:76,A:434153198;C:223317075;G:198260771;T:125932145;N:9431,76,,,,434153198,223317075,198260771,125932145,9431,ERX3511289,ERS3556004,ERA2100634,Computational Biology Unit|European Nucleotide Archive,Computational Biology Unit,1,0.44603,,0.25602,,0.99874,,0.18074,,76,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,nextseq,unknown,other,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Unknown,2019-07-03,Gastrula,Embryo,Undetermined,Embryo Imprecise
9737,ERR3489873,ERX3511288,ERS3556004,ERP116106,PRJEB33323,Deconstructing the individual steps of vertebrate translation initiation,ena-STUDY-Computational Biology Unit-03-07-2019-10:11:34:314-422,Other,In eukaryotes  the number of ribosomes synthesizing a given protein depends on how many are recruited to its mRNA  their success in navigating its five prime untranslated region UTR and whether they recognize its start codon. Initiation of translation is a rate limiting step in protein synthesis and key to gene expression control 1  but despite this centrality it remains poorly understood 2 3. Here we introduce ribosome complex profiling RCP seq to capture the transcriptome wide occupancy of scanning  initiating  elongating and terminating ribosome complexes in a higher eukaryote. We track scanning and elongating ribosomes across all five prime UTRs in zebrafish  which enable us to assess the individual regulatory contributions from the three stages of initiation: ribosome recruitment  scanning of the five prime UTR and recognition of the start codon. Our data sheds light on small subunit recruitment to mRNAs presenting evidence for the threading model and demonstrates that sequence features regulate this recruitment. We estimate the processivity of scanning ribosomes as they traverse the five prime UTR and show that the repressive effects of upstream open reading frames depend on the efficiency of both translation initiation and termination. Finally  we determine the optimal initiation contexts by directly estimating the conversion of scanning to elongating ribosomes and demonstrate specific regulation of translation initiation at the endoplasmic reticulum. Our results open for the possibility of deconvoluting translation initiation into separate stages and provides the first view of global occupancy of ribosomal small subunits in a vertebrate.,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03,,,Shield 1,SAMEA5752545,Computational Biology Unit,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|External Id:SAMEA5752545|INSDC center name:Computational Biology Unit|INSDC first public:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|INSDC last update:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:8|common name:zebrafish|dev stage:Shield|sample name:8|scientific name:Danio rerio,,,,,,,,,NextSeq 500 sequencing,ena EXPERIMENT Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 25,Shield 1 F12,None,RCP seq,,OTHER,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,other,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,NextSeq 500,,ERP116106,NextSeq 500 sequencing,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 08 22,,,1304618128.0,17166028.0,ena RUN Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 25,0:76,A:651341516;C:270458496;G:243929520;T:138874830;N:13766,76,,,,651341516,270458496,243929520,138874830,13766,ERX3511288,ERS3556004,ERA2100634,Computational Biology Unit|European Nucleotide Archive,Computational Biology Unit,1,0.64293,,0.38159,,0.99886,,0.07313,,76,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,nextseq,unknown,other,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Unknown,2019-07-03,Gastrula,Embryo,Undetermined,Embryo Imprecise
9738,ERR3489872,ERX3511287,ERS3556004,ERP116106,PRJEB33323,Deconstructing the individual steps of vertebrate translation initiation,ena-STUDY-Computational Biology Unit-03-07-2019-10:11:34:314-422,Other,In eukaryotes  the number of ribosomes synthesizing a given protein depends on how many are recruited to its mRNA  their success in navigating its five prime untranslated region UTR and whether they recognize its start codon. Initiation of translation is a rate limiting step in protein synthesis and key to gene expression control 1  but despite this centrality it remains poorly understood 2 3. Here we introduce ribosome complex profiling RCP seq to capture the transcriptome wide occupancy of scanning  initiating  elongating and terminating ribosome complexes in a higher eukaryote. We track scanning and elongating ribosomes across all five prime UTRs in zebrafish  which enable us to assess the individual regulatory contributions from the three stages of initiation: ribosome recruitment  scanning of the five prime UTR and recognition of the start codon. Our data sheds light on small subunit recruitment to mRNAs presenting evidence for the threading model and demonstrates that sequence features regulate this recruitment. We estimate the processivity of scanning ribosomes as they traverse the five prime UTR and show that the repressive effects of upstream open reading frames depend on the efficiency of both translation initiation and termination. Finally  we determine the optimal initiation contexts by directly estimating the conversion of scanning to elongating ribosomes and demonstrate specific regulation of translation initiation at the endoplasmic reticulum. Our results open for the possibility of deconvoluting translation initiation into separate stages and provides the first view of global occupancy of ribosomal small subunits in a vertebrate.,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03,,,Shield 1,SAMEA5752545,Computational Biology Unit,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|External Id:SAMEA5752545|INSDC center name:Computational Biology Unit|INSDC first public:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|INSDC last update:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:8|common name:zebrafish|dev stage:Shield|sample name:8|scientific name:Danio rerio,,,,,,,,,NextSeq 500 sequencing,ena EXPERIMENT Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 24,Shield 1 F10,None,RCP seq,,OTHER,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,other,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,NextSeq 500,,ERP116106,NextSeq 500 sequencing,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 08 22,,,1336115948.0,17580473.0,ena RUN Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 24,0:76,A:608634206;C:295943144;G:286494431;T:145029697;N:14470,76,,,,608634206,295943144,286494431,145029697,14470,ERX3511287,ERS3556004,ERA2100634,Computational Biology Unit|European Nucleotide Archive,Computational Biology Unit,1,0.68758,,0.47517,,0.99898,,0.02301,,76,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,nextseq,unknown,other,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Unknown,2019-07-03,Gastrula,Embryo,Undetermined,Embryo Imprecise
9739,ERR3489871,ERX3511286,ERS3556004,ERP116106,PRJEB33323,Deconstructing the individual steps of vertebrate translation initiation,ena-STUDY-Computational Biology Unit-03-07-2019-10:11:34:314-422,Other,In eukaryotes  the number of ribosomes synthesizing a given protein depends on how many are recruited to its mRNA  their success in navigating its five prime untranslated region UTR and whether they recognize its start codon. Initiation of translation is a rate limiting step in protein synthesis and key to gene expression control 1  but despite this centrality it remains poorly understood 2 3. Here we introduce ribosome complex profiling RCP seq to capture the transcriptome wide occupancy of scanning  initiating  elongating and terminating ribosome complexes in a higher eukaryote. We track scanning and elongating ribosomes across all five prime UTRs in zebrafish  which enable us to assess the individual regulatory contributions from the three stages of initiation: ribosome recruitment  scanning of the five prime UTR and recognition of the start codon. Our data sheds light on small subunit recruitment to mRNAs presenting evidence for the threading model and demonstrates that sequence features regulate this recruitment. We estimate the processivity of scanning ribosomes as they traverse the five prime UTR and show that the repressive effects of upstream open reading frames depend on the efficiency of both translation initiation and termination. Finally  we determine the optimal initiation contexts by directly estimating the conversion of scanning to elongating ribosomes and demonstrate specific regulation of translation initiation at the endoplasmic reticulum. Our results open for the possibility of deconvoluting translation initiation into separate stages and provides the first view of global occupancy of ribosomal small subunits in a vertebrate.,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03,,,Shield 1,SAMEA5752545,Computational Biology Unit,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|External Id:SAMEA5752545|INSDC center name:Computational Biology Unit|INSDC first public:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|INSDC last update:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:8|common name:zebrafish|dev stage:Shield|sample name:8|scientific name:Danio rerio,,,,,,,,,NextSeq 500 sequencing,ena EXPERIMENT Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 23,Shield 1 F9,None,RCP seq,,OTHER,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,other,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,NextSeq 500,,ERP116106,NextSeq 500 sequencing,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 08 22,,,1434402492.0,18873717.0,ena RUN Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 23,0:76,A:658705664;C:297967081;G:295595736;T:182118632;N:15379,76,,,,658705664,297967081,295595736,182118632,15379,ERX3511286,ERS3556004,ERA2100634,Computational Biology Unit|European Nucleotide Archive,Computational Biology Unit,1,0.74246,,0.44235,,0.99701,,0.03112,,76,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,nextseq,unknown,other,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Unknown,2019-07-03,Gastrula,Embryo,Undetermined,Embryo Imprecise
9740,ERR3489870,ERX3511285,ERS3556007,ERP116106,PRJEB33323,Deconstructing the individual steps of vertebrate translation initiation,ena-STUDY-Computational Biology Unit-03-07-2019-10:11:34:314-422,Other,In eukaryotes  the number of ribosomes synthesizing a given protein depends on how many are recruited to its mRNA  their success in navigating its five prime untranslated region UTR and whether they recognize its start codon. Initiation of translation is a rate limiting step in protein synthesis and key to gene expression control 1  but despite this centrality it remains poorly understood 2 3. Here we introduce ribosome complex profiling RCP seq to capture the transcriptome wide occupancy of scanning  initiating  elongating and terminating ribosome complexes in a higher eukaryote. We track scanning and elongating ribosomes across all five prime UTRs in zebrafish  which enable us to assess the individual regulatory contributions from the three stages of initiation: ribosome recruitment  scanning of the five prime UTR and recognition of the start codon. Our data sheds light on small subunit recruitment to mRNAs presenting evidence for the threading model and demonstrates that sequence features regulate this recruitment. We estimate the processivity of scanning ribosomes as they traverse the five prime UTR and show that the repressive effects of upstream open reading frames depend on the efficiency of both translation initiation and termination. Finally  we determine the optimal initiation contexts by directly estimating the conversion of scanning to elongating ribosomes and demonstrate specific regulation of translation initiation at the endoplasmic reticulum. Our results open for the possibility of deconvoluting translation initiation into separate stages and provides the first view of global occupancy of ribosomal small subunits in a vertebrate.,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03,,,Shield 4150NT,SAMEA5752548,Computational Biology Unit,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|External Id:SAMEA5752548|INSDC center name:Computational Biology Unit|INSDC first public:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|INSDC last update:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:11|common name:zebrafish|dev stage:Shield|sample name:11|scientific name:Danio rerio,,,,,,,,,NextSeq 500 sequencing,ena EXPERIMENT Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 22,Shield 4150NT LSU,None,RCP seq,,OTHER,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,other,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,NextSeq 500,,ERP116106,NextSeq 500 sequencing,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 08 24,,,24063208094.0,159358994.0,ena RUN Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 22,0:151,A:7153064588;C:5242791119;G:8513736630;T:3152547276;N:1068481,151,,,,7153064588,5242791119,8513736630,3152547276,1068481,ERX3511285,ERS3556007,ERA2100634,Computational Biology Unit|European Nucleotide Archive,Computational Biology Unit,1,0.81267,,0.27138,,0.99868,,0.91938,,151,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,nextseq,unknown,other,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Unknown,2019-07-03,Gastrula,Embryo,Undetermined,Embryo Imprecise
9741,ERR3489869,ERX3511284,ERS3556007,ERP116106,PRJEB33323,Deconstructing the individual steps of vertebrate translation initiation,ena-STUDY-Computational Biology Unit-03-07-2019-10:11:34:314-422,Other,In eukaryotes  the number of ribosomes synthesizing a given protein depends on how many are recruited to its mRNA  their success in navigating its five prime untranslated region UTR and whether they recognize its start codon. Initiation of translation is a rate limiting step in protein synthesis and key to gene expression control 1  but despite this centrality it remains poorly understood 2 3. Here we introduce ribosome complex profiling RCP seq to capture the transcriptome wide occupancy of scanning  initiating  elongating and terminating ribosome complexes in a higher eukaryote. We track scanning and elongating ribosomes across all five prime UTRs in zebrafish  which enable us to assess the individual regulatory contributions from the three stages of initiation: ribosome recruitment  scanning of the five prime UTR and recognition of the start codon. Our data sheds light on small subunit recruitment to mRNAs presenting evidence for the threading model and demonstrates that sequence features regulate this recruitment. We estimate the processivity of scanning ribosomes as they traverse the five prime UTR and show that the repressive effects of upstream open reading frames depend on the efficiency of both translation initiation and termination. Finally  we determine the optimal initiation contexts by directly estimating the conversion of scanning to elongating ribosomes and demonstrate specific regulation of translation initiation at the endoplasmic reticulum. Our results open for the possibility of deconvoluting translation initiation into separate stages and provides the first view of global occupancy of ribosomal small subunits in a vertebrate.,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03,,,Shield 4150NT,SAMEA5752548,Computational Biology Unit,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|External Id:SAMEA5752548|INSDC center name:Computational Biology Unit|INSDC first public:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|INSDC last update:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:11|common name:zebrafish|dev stage:Shield|sample name:11|scientific name:Danio rerio,,,,,,,,,NextSeq 500 sequencing,ena EXPERIMENT Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 21,Shield 4150NT SSU,None,RCP seq,,OTHER,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,other,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,NextSeq 500,,ERP116106,NextSeq 500 sequencing,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 08 24,,,14987998619.0,99258269.0,ena RUN Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 21,0:151,A:4578051806;C:2616328922;G:5914185813;T:1878780090;N:651988,151,,,,4578051806,2616328922,5914185813,1878780090,651988,ERX3511284,ERS3556007,ERA2100634,Computational Biology Unit|European Nucleotide Archive,Computational Biology Unit,1,0.77096,,0.5278,,0.99833,,0.42635,,151,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,nextseq,unknown,other,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Unknown,2019-07-03,Gastrula,Embryo,Undetermined,Embryo Imprecise
9742,ERR3489868,ERX3511283,ERS3556003,ERP116106,PRJEB33323,Deconstructing the individual steps of vertebrate translation initiation,ena-STUDY-Computational Biology Unit-03-07-2019-10:11:34:314-422,Other,In eukaryotes  the number of ribosomes synthesizing a given protein depends on how many are recruited to its mRNA  their success in navigating its five prime untranslated region UTR and whether they recognize its start codon. Initiation of translation is a rate limiting step in protein synthesis and key to gene expression control 1  but despite this centrality it remains poorly understood 2 3. Here we introduce ribosome complex profiling RCP seq to capture the transcriptome wide occupancy of scanning  initiating  elongating and terminating ribosome complexes in a higher eukaryote. We track scanning and elongating ribosomes across all five prime UTRs in zebrafish  which enable us to assess the individual regulatory contributions from the three stages of initiation: ribosome recruitment  scanning of the five prime UTR and recognition of the start codon. Our data sheds light on small subunit recruitment to mRNAs presenting evidence for the threading model and demonstrates that sequence features regulate this recruitment. We estimate the processivity of scanning ribosomes as they traverse the five prime UTR and show that the repressive effects of upstream open reading frames depend on the efficiency of both translation initiation and termination. Finally  we determine the optimal initiation contexts by directly estimating the conversion of scanning to elongating ribosomes and demonstrate specific regulation of translation initiation at the endoplasmic reticulum. Our results open for the possibility of deconvoluting translation initiation into separate stages and provides the first view of global occupancy of ribosomal small subunits in a vertebrate.,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03,,,64 cell 4Ei 10,SAMEA5752544,Computational Biology Unit,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|External Id:SAMEA5752544|INSDC center name:Computational Biology Unit|INSDC first public:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|INSDC last update:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:7|common name:zebrafish|dev stage:64 cell|sample name:7|scientific name:Danio rerio,,,,,,,,,NextSeq 500 sequencing,ena EXPERIMENT Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 20,64 cell 4Ei 10 SSU,None,RCP seq,,OTHER,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,other,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,NextSeq 500,,ERP116106,NextSeq 500 sequencing,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 08 22,,,5928054796.0,78000721.0,ena RUN Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 20,0:76,A:2109854905;C:1377083508;G:1616166285;T:824889630;N:60468,76,,,,2109854905,1377083508,1616166285,824889630,60468,ERX3511283,ERS3556003,ERA2100634,Computational Biology Unit|European Nucleotide Archive,Computational Biology Unit,1,0.61525,,0.45233,,0.99379,,0.57373,,76,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,nextseq,unknown,other,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Unknown,2019-07-03,Cleavage,Embryo,Undetermined,Embryo Imprecise
9743,ERR3489867,ERX3511282,ERS3556003,ERP116106,PRJEB33323,Deconstructing the individual steps of vertebrate translation initiation,ena-STUDY-Computational Biology Unit-03-07-2019-10:11:34:314-422,Other,In eukaryotes  the number of ribosomes synthesizing a given protein depends on how many are recruited to its mRNA  their success in navigating its five prime untranslated region UTR and whether they recognize its start codon. Initiation of translation is a rate limiting step in protein synthesis and key to gene expression control 1  but despite this centrality it remains poorly understood 2 3. Here we introduce ribosome complex profiling RCP seq to capture the transcriptome wide occupancy of scanning  initiating  elongating and terminating ribosome complexes in a higher eukaryote. We track scanning and elongating ribosomes across all five prime UTRs in zebrafish  which enable us to assess the individual regulatory contributions from the three stages of initiation: ribosome recruitment  scanning of the five prime UTR and recognition of the start codon. Our data sheds light on small subunit recruitment to mRNAs presenting evidence for the threading model and demonstrates that sequence features regulate this recruitment. We estimate the processivity of scanning ribosomes as they traverse the five prime UTR and show that the repressive effects of upstream open reading frames depend on the efficiency of both translation initiation and termination. Finally  we determine the optimal initiation contexts by directly estimating the conversion of scanning to elongating ribosomes and demonstrate specific regulation of translation initiation at the endoplasmic reticulum. Our results open for the possibility of deconvoluting translation initiation into separate stages and provides the first view of global occupancy of ribosomal small subunits in a vertebrate.,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03,,,64 cell 4Ei 10,SAMEA5752544,Computational Biology Unit,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|External Id:SAMEA5752544|INSDC center name:Computational Biology Unit|INSDC first public:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|INSDC last update:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:7|common name:zebrafish|dev stage:64 cell|sample name:7|scientific name:Danio rerio,,,,,,,,,NextSeq 500 sequencing,ena EXPERIMENT Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 19,64 cell 4Ei 10 SSU,None,RCP seq,,OTHER,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,other,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,NextSeq 500,,ERP116106,NextSeq 500 sequencing,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 08 22,,,9772604780.0,128586905.0,ena RUN Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 19,0:76,A:3901301079;C:2223067879;G:2553338016;T:1094797648;N:100158,76,,,,3901301079,2223067879,2553338016,1094797648,100158,ERX3511282,ERS3556003,ERA2100634,Computational Biology Unit|European Nucleotide Archive,Computational Biology Unit,1,0.52103,,0.25046,,0.9861,,0.64575,,76,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,nextseq,unknown,other,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Unknown,2019-07-03,Cleavage,Embryo,Undetermined,Embryo Imprecise
9744,ERR3489866,ERX3511281,ERS3556002,ERP116106,PRJEB33323,Deconstructing the individual steps of vertebrate translation initiation,ena-STUDY-Computational Biology Unit-03-07-2019-10:11:34:314-422,Other,In eukaryotes  the number of ribosomes synthesizing a given protein depends on how many are recruited to its mRNA  their success in navigating its five prime untranslated region UTR and whether they recognize its start codon. Initiation of translation is a rate limiting step in protein synthesis and key to gene expression control 1  but despite this centrality it remains poorly understood 2 3. Here we introduce ribosome complex profiling RCP seq to capture the transcriptome wide occupancy of scanning  initiating  elongating and terminating ribosome complexes in a higher eukaryote. We track scanning and elongating ribosomes across all five prime UTRs in zebrafish  which enable us to assess the individual regulatory contributions from the three stages of initiation: ribosome recruitment  scanning of the five prime UTR and recognition of the start codon. Our data sheds light on small subunit recruitment to mRNAs presenting evidence for the threading model and demonstrates that sequence features regulate this recruitment. We estimate the processivity of scanning ribosomes as they traverse the five prime UTR and show that the repressive effects of upstream open reading frames depend on the efficiency of both translation initiation and termination. Finally  we determine the optimal initiation contexts by directly estimating the conversion of scanning to elongating ribosomes and demonstrate specific regulation of translation initiation at the endoplasmic reticulum. Our results open for the possibility of deconvoluting translation initiation into separate stages and provides the first view of global occupancy of ribosomal small subunits in a vertebrate.,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03,,,64 cell 4Ei 0.1,SAMEA5752543,Computational Biology Unit,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|External Id:SAMEA5752543|INSDC center name:Computational Biology Unit|INSDC first public:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|INSDC last update:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:6|common name:zebrafish|dev stage:64 cell|sample name:6|scientific name:Danio rerio,,,,,,,,,NextSeq 500 sequencing,ena EXPERIMENT Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 18,64 cell 4Ei 0.1 LSU,None,RCP seq,,OTHER,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,other,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,NextSeq 500,,ERP116106,NextSeq 500 sequencing,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 09 26,,,6730725680.0,88562180.0,ena RUN Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 18,0:76,A:3805722011;C:1188715051;G:1382258076;T:353814168;N:216374,76,,,,3805722011,1188715051,1382258076,353814168,216374,ERX3511281,ERS3556002,ERA2100634,Computational Biology Unit|European Nucleotide Archive,Computational Biology Unit,1,0.61922,,0.37217,,0.99527,,0.29148,,76,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,nextseq,unknown,other,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Unknown,2019-07-03,Cleavage,Embryo,Undetermined,Embryo Imprecise
9745,ERR3489865,ERX3511280,ERS3556002,ERP116106,PRJEB33323,Deconstructing the individual steps of vertebrate translation initiation,ena-STUDY-Computational Biology Unit-03-07-2019-10:11:34:314-422,Other,In eukaryotes  the number of ribosomes synthesizing a given protein depends on how many are recruited to its mRNA  their success in navigating its five prime untranslated region UTR and whether they recognize its start codon. Initiation of translation is a rate limiting step in protein synthesis and key to gene expression control 1  but despite this centrality it remains poorly understood 2 3. Here we introduce ribosome complex profiling RCP seq to capture the transcriptome wide occupancy of scanning  initiating  elongating and terminating ribosome complexes in a higher eukaryote. We track scanning and elongating ribosomes across all five prime UTRs in zebrafish  which enable us to assess the individual regulatory contributions from the three stages of initiation: ribosome recruitment  scanning of the five prime UTR and recognition of the start codon. Our data sheds light on small subunit recruitment to mRNAs presenting evidence for the threading model and demonstrates that sequence features regulate this recruitment. We estimate the processivity of scanning ribosomes as they traverse the five prime UTR and show that the repressive effects of upstream open reading frames depend on the efficiency of both translation initiation and termination. Finally  we determine the optimal initiation contexts by directly estimating the conversion of scanning to elongating ribosomes and demonstrate specific regulation of translation initiation at the endoplasmic reticulum. Our results open for the possibility of deconvoluting translation initiation into separate stages and provides the first view of global occupancy of ribosomal small subunits in a vertebrate.,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03,,,64 cell 4Ei 0.1,SAMEA5752543,Computational Biology Unit,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|External Id:SAMEA5752543|INSDC center name:Computational Biology Unit|INSDC first public:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|INSDC last update:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:6|common name:zebrafish|dev stage:64 cell|sample name:6|scientific name:Danio rerio,,,,,,,,,NextSeq 500 sequencing,ena EXPERIMENT Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 17,64 cell 4Ei 0.1 SSU,None,RCP seq,,OTHER,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,other,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,NextSeq 500,,ERP116106,NextSeq 500 sequencing,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 09 26,,,10616304872.0,139688222.0,ena RUN Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 17,0:76,A:4717003484;C:2600725234;G:2586105174;T:712124440;N:346540,76,,,,4717003484,2600725234,2586105174,712124440,346540,ERX3511280,ERS3556002,ERA2100634,Computational Biology Unit|European Nucleotide Archive,Computational Biology Unit,1,0.30908,,0.08252,,0.94683,,0.69548,,76,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,nextseq,unknown,other,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Unknown,2019-07-03,Cleavage,Embryo,Undetermined,Embryo Imprecise
9746,ERR3489864,ERX3511279,ERS3556006,ERP116106,PRJEB33323,Deconstructing the individual steps of vertebrate translation initiation,ena-STUDY-Computational Biology Unit-03-07-2019-10:11:34:314-422,Other,In eukaryotes  the number of ribosomes synthesizing a given protein depends on how many are recruited to its mRNA  their success in navigating its five prime untranslated region UTR and whether they recognize its start codon. Initiation of translation is a rate limiting step in protein synthesis and key to gene expression control 1  but despite this centrality it remains poorly understood 2 3. Here we introduce ribosome complex profiling RCP seq to capture the transcriptome wide occupancy of scanning  initiating  elongating and terminating ribosome complexes in a higher eukaryote. We track scanning and elongating ribosomes across all five prime UTRs in zebrafish  which enable us to assess the individual regulatory contributions from the three stages of initiation: ribosome recruitment  scanning of the five prime UTR and recognition of the start codon. Our data sheds light on small subunit recruitment to mRNAs presenting evidence for the threading model and demonstrates that sequence features regulate this recruitment. We estimate the processivity of scanning ribosomes as they traverse the five prime UTR and show that the repressive effects of upstream open reading frames depend on the efficiency of both translation initiation and termination. Finally  we determine the optimal initiation contexts by directly estimating the conversion of scanning to elongating ribosomes and demonstrate specific regulation of translation initiation at the endoplasmic reticulum. Our results open for the possibility of deconvoluting translation initiation into separate stages and provides the first view of global occupancy of ribosomal small subunits in a vertebrate.,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03,,,Shield 3,SAMEA5752547,Computational Biology Unit,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|External Id:SAMEA5752547|INSDC center name:Computational Biology Unit|INSDC first public:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|INSDC last update:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:10|common name:zebrafish|dev stage:Shield|sample name:10|scientific name:Danio rerio,,,,,,,,,NextSeq 500 sequencing,ena EXPERIMENT Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 16,Shield 3 LSU,None,RCP seq,,OTHER,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,other,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,NextSeq 500,,ERP116106,NextSeq 500 sequencing,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 08 22,,,11777220072.0,154963422.0,ena RUN Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 16,0:76,A:3368038444;C:3190496935;G:3529701152;T:1688766119;N:217422,76,,,,3368038444,3190496935,3529701152,1688766119,217422,ERX3511279,ERS3556006,ERA2100634,Computational Biology Unit|European Nucleotide Archive,Computational Biology Unit,1,0.70681,,0.18846,,0.99332,,0.71978,,76,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,nextseq,unknown,other,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Unknown,2019-07-03,Gastrula,Embryo,Undetermined,Embryo Imprecise
9747,ERR3489863,ERX3511278,ERS3556006,ERP116106,PRJEB33323,Deconstructing the individual steps of vertebrate translation initiation,ena-STUDY-Computational Biology Unit-03-07-2019-10:11:34:314-422,Other,In eukaryotes  the number of ribosomes synthesizing a given protein depends on how many are recruited to its mRNA  their success in navigating its five prime untranslated region UTR and whether they recognize its start codon. Initiation of translation is a rate limiting step in protein synthesis and key to gene expression control 1  but despite this centrality it remains poorly understood 2 3. Here we introduce ribosome complex profiling RCP seq to capture the transcriptome wide occupancy of scanning  initiating  elongating and terminating ribosome complexes in a higher eukaryote. We track scanning and elongating ribosomes across all five prime UTRs in zebrafish  which enable us to assess the individual regulatory contributions from the three stages of initiation: ribosome recruitment  scanning of the five prime UTR and recognition of the start codon. Our data sheds light on small subunit recruitment to mRNAs presenting evidence for the threading model and demonstrates that sequence features regulate this recruitment. We estimate the processivity of scanning ribosomes as they traverse the five prime UTR and show that the repressive effects of upstream open reading frames depend on the efficiency of both translation initiation and termination. Finally  we determine the optimal initiation contexts by directly estimating the conversion of scanning to elongating ribosomes and demonstrate specific regulation of translation initiation at the endoplasmic reticulum. Our results open for the possibility of deconvoluting translation initiation into separate stages and provides the first view of global occupancy of ribosomal small subunits in a vertebrate.,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03,,,Shield 3,SAMEA5752547,Computational Biology Unit,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|External Id:SAMEA5752547|INSDC center name:Computational Biology Unit|INSDC first public:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|INSDC last update:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:10|common name:zebrafish|dev stage:Shield|sample name:10|scientific name:Danio rerio,,,,,,,,,NextSeq 500 sequencing,ena EXPERIMENT Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 15,Shield 3 SSU,None,RCP seq,,OTHER,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,other,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,NextSeq 500,,ERP116106,NextSeq 500 sequencing,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 08 22,,,7920419952.0,104216052.0,ena RUN Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 15,0:76,A:2990167185;C:1767708808;G:2104830363;T:1057568560;N:145036,76,,,,2990167185,1767708808,2104830363,1057568560,145036,ERX3511278,ERS3556006,ERA2100634,Computational Biology Unit|European Nucleotide Archive,Computational Biology Unit,1,0.5052,,0.30841,,0.99129,,0.60948,,76,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,nextseq,unknown,other,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Unknown,2019-07-03,Gastrula,Embryo,Undetermined,Embryo Imprecise
9748,ERR3489862,ERX3511277,ERS3556005,ERP116106,PRJEB33323,Deconstructing the individual steps of vertebrate translation initiation,ena-STUDY-Computational Biology Unit-03-07-2019-10:11:34:314-422,Other,In eukaryotes  the number of ribosomes synthesizing a given protein depends on how many are recruited to its mRNA  their success in navigating its five prime untranslated region UTR and whether they recognize its start codon. Initiation of translation is a rate limiting step in protein synthesis and key to gene expression control 1  but despite this centrality it remains poorly understood 2 3. Here we introduce ribosome complex profiling RCP seq to capture the transcriptome wide occupancy of scanning  initiating  elongating and terminating ribosome complexes in a higher eukaryote. We track scanning and elongating ribosomes across all five prime UTRs in zebrafish  which enable us to assess the individual regulatory contributions from the three stages of initiation: ribosome recruitment  scanning of the five prime UTR and recognition of the start codon. Our data sheds light on small subunit recruitment to mRNAs presenting evidence for the threading model and demonstrates that sequence features regulate this recruitment. We estimate the processivity of scanning ribosomes as they traverse the five prime UTR and show that the repressive effects of upstream open reading frames depend on the efficiency of both translation initiation and termination. Finally  we determine the optimal initiation contexts by directly estimating the conversion of scanning to elongating ribosomes and demonstrate specific regulation of translation initiation at the endoplasmic reticulum. Our results open for the possibility of deconvoluting translation initiation into separate stages and provides the first view of global occupancy of ribosomal small subunits in a vertebrate.,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03,,,Shield 2,SAMEA5752546,Computational Biology Unit,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|External Id:SAMEA5752546|INSDC center name:Computational Biology Unit|INSDC first public:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|INSDC last update:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:9|common name:zebrafish|dev stage:Shield|sample name:9|scientific name:Danio rerio,,,,,,,,,NextSeq 500 sequencing,ena EXPERIMENT Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 14,Shield 2 LSU,None,RCP seq,,OTHER,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,other,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,NextSeq 500,,ERP116106,NextSeq 500 sequencing,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 08 22,,,9775297004.0,128622329.0,ena RUN Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 14,0:76,A:4750565405;C:2540992255;G:1698817649;T:784832634;N:89061,76,,,,4750565405,2540992255,1698817649,784832634,89061,ERX3511277,ERS3556005,ERA2100634,Computational Biology Unit|European Nucleotide Archive,Computational Biology Unit,1,0.74003,,0.5616,,0.99855,,0.03607,,76,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,nextseq,unknown,other,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Unknown,2019-07-03,Gastrula,Embryo,Undetermined,Embryo Imprecise
9749,ERR3489861,ERX3511276,ERS3556005,ERP116106,PRJEB33323,Deconstructing the individual steps of vertebrate translation initiation,ena-STUDY-Computational Biology Unit-03-07-2019-10:11:34:314-422,Other,In eukaryotes  the number of ribosomes synthesizing a given protein depends on how many are recruited to its mRNA  their success in navigating its five prime untranslated region UTR and whether they recognize its start codon. Initiation of translation is a rate limiting step in protein synthesis and key to gene expression control 1  but despite this centrality it remains poorly understood 2 3. Here we introduce ribosome complex profiling RCP seq to capture the transcriptome wide occupancy of scanning  initiating  elongating and terminating ribosome complexes in a higher eukaryote. We track scanning and elongating ribosomes across all five prime UTRs in zebrafish  which enable us to assess the individual regulatory contributions from the three stages of initiation: ribosome recruitment  scanning of the five prime UTR and recognition of the start codon. Our data sheds light on small subunit recruitment to mRNAs presenting evidence for the threading model and demonstrates that sequence features regulate this recruitment. We estimate the processivity of scanning ribosomes as they traverse the five prime UTR and show that the repressive effects of upstream open reading frames depend on the efficiency of both translation initiation and termination. Finally  we determine the optimal initiation contexts by directly estimating the conversion of scanning to elongating ribosomes and demonstrate specific regulation of translation initiation at the endoplasmic reticulum. Our results open for the possibility of deconvoluting translation initiation into separate stages and provides the first view of global occupancy of ribosomal small subunits in a vertebrate.,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03,,,Shield 2,SAMEA5752546,Computational Biology Unit,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|External Id:SAMEA5752546|INSDC center name:Computational Biology Unit|INSDC first public:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|INSDC last update:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:9|common name:zebrafish|dev stage:Shield|sample name:9|scientific name:Danio rerio,,,,,,,,,NextSeq 500 sequencing,ena EXPERIMENT Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 13,Shield 2 SSU,None,RCP seq,,OTHER,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,other,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,NextSeq 500,,ERP116106,NextSeq 500 sequencing,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 08 22,,,8210103300.0,108027675.0,ena RUN Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 13,0:76,A:3300825043;C:2576709678;G:1707115198;T:625376255;N:77126,76,,,,3300825043,2576709678,1707115198,625376255,77126,ERX3511276,ERS3556005,ERA2100634,Computational Biology Unit|European Nucleotide Archive,Computational Biology Unit,1,0.2787,,0.17583,,0.99752,,0.50171,,76,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,nextseq,unknown,other,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Unknown,2019-07-03,Gastrula,Embryo,Undetermined,Embryo Imprecise
9750,ERR3489860,ERX3511275,ERS3556004,ERP116106,PRJEB33323,Deconstructing the individual steps of vertebrate translation initiation,ena-STUDY-Computational Biology Unit-03-07-2019-10:11:34:314-422,Other,In eukaryotes  the number of ribosomes synthesizing a given protein depends on how many are recruited to its mRNA  their success in navigating its five prime untranslated region UTR and whether they recognize its start codon. Initiation of translation is a rate limiting step in protein synthesis and key to gene expression control 1  but despite this centrality it remains poorly understood 2 3. Here we introduce ribosome complex profiling RCP seq to capture the transcriptome wide occupancy of scanning  initiating  elongating and terminating ribosome complexes in a higher eukaryote. We track scanning and elongating ribosomes across all five prime UTRs in zebrafish  which enable us to assess the individual regulatory contributions from the three stages of initiation: ribosome recruitment  scanning of the five prime UTR and recognition of the start codon. Our data sheds light on small subunit recruitment to mRNAs presenting evidence for the threading model and demonstrates that sequence features regulate this recruitment. We estimate the processivity of scanning ribosomes as they traverse the five prime UTR and show that the repressive effects of upstream open reading frames depend on the efficiency of both translation initiation and termination. Finally  we determine the optimal initiation contexts by directly estimating the conversion of scanning to elongating ribosomes and demonstrate specific regulation of translation initiation at the endoplasmic reticulum. Our results open for the possibility of deconvoluting translation initiation into separate stages and provides the first view of global occupancy of ribosomal small subunits in a vertebrate.,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03,,,Shield 1,SAMEA5752545,Computational Biology Unit,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|External Id:SAMEA5752545|INSDC center name:Computational Biology Unit|INSDC first public:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|INSDC last update:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:8|common name:zebrafish|dev stage:Shield|sample name:8|scientific name:Danio rerio,,,,,,,,,NextSeq 500 sequencing,ena EXPERIMENT Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 12,Shield 1 LSU,None,RCP seq,,OTHER,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,other,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,NextSeq 500,,ERP116106,NextSeq 500 sequencing,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 08 22,,,2437679936.0,32074736.0,ena RUN Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 12,0:76,A:764355184;C:710492003;G:664031460;T:298777374;N:23915,76,,,,764355184,710492003,664031460,298777374,23915,ERX3511275,ERS3556004,ERA2100634,Computational Biology Unit|European Nucleotide Archive,Computational Biology Unit,1,0.0406,,0.02417,,0.99908,,0.61299,,76,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,nextseq,unknown,other,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Unknown,2019-07-03,Gastrula,Embryo,Undetermined,Embryo Imprecise
9751,ERR3489859,ERX3511274,ERS3556004,ERP116106,PRJEB33323,Deconstructing the individual steps of vertebrate translation initiation,ena-STUDY-Computational Biology Unit-03-07-2019-10:11:34:314-422,Other,In eukaryotes  the number of ribosomes synthesizing a given protein depends on how many are recruited to its mRNA  their success in navigating its five prime untranslated region UTR and whether they recognize its start codon. Initiation of translation is a rate limiting step in protein synthesis and key to gene expression control 1  but despite this centrality it remains poorly understood 2 3. Here we introduce ribosome complex profiling RCP seq to capture the transcriptome wide occupancy of scanning  initiating  elongating and terminating ribosome complexes in a higher eukaryote. We track scanning and elongating ribosomes across all five prime UTRs in zebrafish  which enable us to assess the individual regulatory contributions from the three stages of initiation: ribosome recruitment  scanning of the five prime UTR and recognition of the start codon. Our data sheds light on small subunit recruitment to mRNAs presenting evidence for the threading model and demonstrates that sequence features regulate this recruitment. We estimate the processivity of scanning ribosomes as they traverse the five prime UTR and show that the repressive effects of upstream open reading frames depend on the efficiency of both translation initiation and termination. Finally  we determine the optimal initiation contexts by directly estimating the conversion of scanning to elongating ribosomes and demonstrate specific regulation of translation initiation at the endoplasmic reticulum. Our results open for the possibility of deconvoluting translation initiation into separate stages and provides the first view of global occupancy of ribosomal small subunits in a vertebrate.,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03,,,Shield 1,SAMEA5752545,Computational Biology Unit,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|External Id:SAMEA5752545|INSDC center name:Computational Biology Unit|INSDC first public:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|INSDC last update:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:8|common name:zebrafish|dev stage:Shield|sample name:8|scientific name:Danio rerio,,,,,,,,,NextSeq 500 sequencing,ena EXPERIMENT Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 11,Shield 1 SSU,None,RCP seq,,OTHER,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,other,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,NextSeq 500,,ERP116106,NextSeq 500 sequencing,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 08 22,,,3157243376.0,41542676.0,ena RUN Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 11,0:76,A:1443205052;C:715251024;G:633421305;T:365333650;N:32345,76,,,,1443205052,715251024,633421305,365333650,32345,ERX3511274,ERS3556004,ERA2100634,Computational Biology Unit|European Nucleotide Archive,Computational Biology Unit,1,0.47643,,0.27944,,0.99896,,0.11464,,76,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,nextseq,unknown,other,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Unknown,2019-07-03,Gastrula,Embryo,Undetermined,Embryo Imprecise
9752,ERR3489858,ERX3511273,ERS3556001,ERP116106,PRJEB33323,Deconstructing the individual steps of vertebrate translation initiation,ena-STUDY-Computational Biology Unit-03-07-2019-10:11:34:314-422,Other,In eukaryotes  the number of ribosomes synthesizing a given protein depends on how many are recruited to its mRNA  their success in navigating its five prime untranslated region UTR and whether they recognize its start codon. Initiation of translation is a rate limiting step in protein synthesis and key to gene expression control 1  but despite this centrality it remains poorly understood 2 3. Here we introduce ribosome complex profiling RCP seq to capture the transcriptome wide occupancy of scanning  initiating  elongating and terminating ribosome complexes in a higher eukaryote. We track scanning and elongating ribosomes across all five prime UTRs in zebrafish  which enable us to assess the individual regulatory contributions from the three stages of initiation: ribosome recruitment  scanning of the five prime UTR and recognition of the start codon. Our data sheds light on small subunit recruitment to mRNAs presenting evidence for the threading model and demonstrates that sequence features regulate this recruitment. We estimate the processivity of scanning ribosomes as they traverse the five prime UTR and show that the repressive effects of upstream open reading frames depend on the efficiency of both translation initiation and termination. Finally  we determine the optimal initiation contexts by directly estimating the conversion of scanning to elongating ribosomes and demonstrate specific regulation of translation initiation at the endoplasmic reticulum. Our results open for the possibility of deconvoluting translation initiation into separate stages and provides the first view of global occupancy of ribosomal small subunits in a vertebrate.,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03,,,Sphere 3,SAMEA5752542,Computational Biology Unit,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|External Id:SAMEA5752542|INSDC center name:Computational Biology Unit|INSDC first public:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|INSDC last update:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:5|common name:zebrafish|dev stage:Sphere|sample name:5|scientific name:Danio rerio,,,,,,,,,NextSeq 500 sequencing,ena EXPERIMENT Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 10,Sphere 3 LSU,None,RCP seq,,OTHER,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,other,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,NextSeq 500,,ERP116106,NextSeq 500 sequencing,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 08 22,,,2740392724.0,36057799.0,ena RUN Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 10,0:76,A:1790452280;C:354001675;G:431182140;T:164697730;N:58899,76,,,,1790452280,354001675,431182140,164697730,58899,ERX3511273,ERS3556001,ERA2100634,Computational Biology Unit|European Nucleotide Archive,Computational Biology Unit,1,0.87154,,0.5323,,0.99793,,0.02983,,76,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,nextseq,unknown,other,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Unknown,2019-07-03,Blastula,Embryo,Undetermined,Embryo Imprecise
9753,ERR3489857,ERX3511272,ERS3556001,ERP116106,PRJEB33323,Deconstructing the individual steps of vertebrate translation initiation,ena-STUDY-Computational Biology Unit-03-07-2019-10:11:34:314-422,Other,In eukaryotes  the number of ribosomes synthesizing a given protein depends on how many are recruited to its mRNA  their success in navigating its five prime untranslated region UTR and whether they recognize its start codon. Initiation of translation is a rate limiting step in protein synthesis and key to gene expression control 1  but despite this centrality it remains poorly understood 2 3. Here we introduce ribosome complex profiling RCP seq to capture the transcriptome wide occupancy of scanning  initiating  elongating and terminating ribosome complexes in a higher eukaryote. We track scanning and elongating ribosomes across all five prime UTRs in zebrafish  which enable us to assess the individual regulatory contributions from the three stages of initiation: ribosome recruitment  scanning of the five prime UTR and recognition of the start codon. Our data sheds light on small subunit recruitment to mRNAs presenting evidence for the threading model and demonstrates that sequence features regulate this recruitment. We estimate the processivity of scanning ribosomes as they traverse the five prime UTR and show that the repressive effects of upstream open reading frames depend on the efficiency of both translation initiation and termination. Finally  we determine the optimal initiation contexts by directly estimating the conversion of scanning to elongating ribosomes and demonstrate specific regulation of translation initiation at the endoplasmic reticulum. Our results open for the possibility of deconvoluting translation initiation into separate stages and provides the first view of global occupancy of ribosomal small subunits in a vertebrate.,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03,,,Sphere 3,SAMEA5752542,Computational Biology Unit,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|External Id:SAMEA5752542|INSDC center name:Computational Biology Unit|INSDC first public:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|INSDC last update:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:5|common name:zebrafish|dev stage:Sphere|sample name:5|scientific name:Danio rerio,,,,,,,,,NextSeq 500 sequencing,ena EXPERIMENT Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 9,Sphere 3 SSU,None,RCP seq,,OTHER,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,other,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,NextSeq 500,,ERP116106,NextSeq 500 sequencing,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 08 22,,,6277242192.0,82595292.0,ena RUN Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 9,0:76,A:3129446012;C:1311888416;G:1369035262;T:466745503;N:126999,76,,,,3129446012,1311888416,1369035262,466745503,126999,ERX3511272,ERS3556001,ERA2100634,Computational Biology Unit|European Nucleotide Archive,Computational Biology Unit,1,0.65637,,0.35975,,0.9936,,0.24734,,76,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,nextseq,unknown,other,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Unknown,2019-07-03,Blastula,Embryo,Undetermined,Embryo Imprecise
9754,ERR3489856,ERX3511271,ERS3556000,ERP116106,PRJEB33323,Deconstructing the individual steps of vertebrate translation initiation,ena-STUDY-Computational Biology Unit-03-07-2019-10:11:34:314-422,Other,In eukaryotes  the number of ribosomes synthesizing a given protein depends on how many are recruited to its mRNA  their success in navigating its five prime untranslated region UTR and whether they recognize its start codon. Initiation of translation is a rate limiting step in protein synthesis and key to gene expression control 1  but despite this centrality it remains poorly understood 2 3. Here we introduce ribosome complex profiling RCP seq to capture the transcriptome wide occupancy of scanning  initiating  elongating and terminating ribosome complexes in a higher eukaryote. We track scanning and elongating ribosomes across all five prime UTRs in zebrafish  which enable us to assess the individual regulatory contributions from the three stages of initiation: ribosome recruitment  scanning of the five prime UTR and recognition of the start codon. Our data sheds light on small subunit recruitment to mRNAs presenting evidence for the threading model and demonstrates that sequence features regulate this recruitment. We estimate the processivity of scanning ribosomes as they traverse the five prime UTR and show that the repressive effects of upstream open reading frames depend on the efficiency of both translation initiation and termination. Finally  we determine the optimal initiation contexts by directly estimating the conversion of scanning to elongating ribosomes and demonstrate specific regulation of translation initiation at the endoplasmic reticulum. Our results open for the possibility of deconvoluting translation initiation into separate stages and provides the first view of global occupancy of ribosomal small subunits in a vertebrate.,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03,,,Sphere 2,SAMEA5752541,Computational Biology Unit,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|External Id:SAMEA5752541|INSDC center name:Computational Biology Unit|INSDC first public:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|INSDC last update:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:4|common name:zebrafish|dev stage:Sphere|sample name:4|scientific name:Danio rerio,,,,,,,,,NextSeq 500 sequencing,ena EXPERIMENT Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 8,Sphere 2 LSU,None,RCP seq,,OTHER,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,other,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,NextSeq 500,,ERP116106,NextSeq 500 sequencing,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 08 24,,,6679993476.0,87894651.0,ena RUN Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 8,0:76,A:3113787833;C:1255798935;G:1750515950;T:559763997;N:126761,76,,,,3113787833,1255798935,1750515950,559763997,126761,ERX3511271,ERS3556000,ERA2100634,Computational Biology Unit|European Nucleotide Archive,Computational Biology Unit,1,0.66287,,0.41208,,0.99602,,0.17083,,76,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,nextseq,unknown,other,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Unknown,2019-07-03,Blastula,Embryo,Undetermined,Embryo Imprecise
9755,ERR3489855,ERX3511270,ERS3556000,ERP116106,PRJEB33323,Deconstructing the individual steps of vertebrate translation initiation,ena-STUDY-Computational Biology Unit-03-07-2019-10:11:34:314-422,Other,In eukaryotes  the number of ribosomes synthesizing a given protein depends on how many are recruited to its mRNA  their success in navigating its five prime untranslated region UTR and whether they recognize its start codon. Initiation of translation is a rate limiting step in protein synthesis and key to gene expression control 1  but despite this centrality it remains poorly understood 2 3. Here we introduce ribosome complex profiling RCP seq to capture the transcriptome wide occupancy of scanning  initiating  elongating and terminating ribosome complexes in a higher eukaryote. We track scanning and elongating ribosomes across all five prime UTRs in zebrafish  which enable us to assess the individual regulatory contributions from the three stages of initiation: ribosome recruitment  scanning of the five prime UTR and recognition of the start codon. Our data sheds light on small subunit recruitment to mRNAs presenting evidence for the threading model and demonstrates that sequence features regulate this recruitment. We estimate the processivity of scanning ribosomes as they traverse the five prime UTR and show that the repressive effects of upstream open reading frames depend on the efficiency of both translation initiation and termination. Finally  we determine the optimal initiation contexts by directly estimating the conversion of scanning to elongating ribosomes and demonstrate specific regulation of translation initiation at the endoplasmic reticulum. Our results open for the possibility of deconvoluting translation initiation into separate stages and provides the first view of global occupancy of ribosomal small subunits in a vertebrate.,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03,,,Sphere 2,SAMEA5752541,Computational Biology Unit,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|External Id:SAMEA5752541|INSDC center name:Computational Biology Unit|INSDC first public:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|INSDC last update:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:4|common name:zebrafish|dev stage:Sphere|sample name:4|scientific name:Danio rerio,,,,,,,,,NextSeq 500 sequencing,ena EXPERIMENT Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:423 7,Sphere 2 SSU,None,RCP seq,,OTHER,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,other,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,NextSeq 500,,ERP116106,NextSeq 500 sequencing,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 08 22,,,13238731764.0,174193839.0,ena RUN Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 7,0:76,A:7630016769;C:1835321568;G:2775223283;T:997916159;N:253985,76,,,,7630016769,1835321568,2775223283,997916159,253985,ERX3511270,ERS3556000,ERA2100634,Computational Biology Unit|European Nucleotide Archive,Computational Biology Unit,1,0.77269,,0.45994,,0.99683,,0.04249,,76,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,nextseq,unknown,other,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Unknown,2019-07-03,Blastula,Embryo,Undetermined,Embryo Imprecise
9756,ERR3489854,ERX3511269,ERS3555999,ERP116106,PRJEB33323,Deconstructing the individual steps of vertebrate translation initiation,ena-STUDY-Computational Biology Unit-03-07-2019-10:11:34:314-422,Other,In eukaryotes  the number of ribosomes synthesizing a given protein depends on how many are recruited to its mRNA  their success in navigating its five prime untranslated region UTR and whether they recognize its start codon. Initiation of translation is a rate limiting step in protein synthesis and key to gene expression control 1  but despite this centrality it remains poorly understood 2 3. Here we introduce ribosome complex profiling RCP seq to capture the transcriptome wide occupancy of scanning  initiating  elongating and terminating ribosome complexes in a higher eukaryote. We track scanning and elongating ribosomes across all five prime UTRs in zebrafish  which enable us to assess the individual regulatory contributions from the three stages of initiation: ribosome recruitment  scanning of the five prime UTR and recognition of the start codon. Our data sheds light on small subunit recruitment to mRNAs presenting evidence for the threading model and demonstrates that sequence features regulate this recruitment. We estimate the processivity of scanning ribosomes as they traverse the five prime UTR and show that the repressive effects of upstream open reading frames depend on the efficiency of both translation initiation and termination. Finally  we determine the optimal initiation contexts by directly estimating the conversion of scanning to elongating ribosomes and demonstrate specific regulation of translation initiation at the endoplasmic reticulum. Our results open for the possibility of deconvoluting translation initiation into separate stages and provides the first view of global occupancy of ribosomal small subunits in a vertebrate.,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03,,,Sphere 1,SAMEA5752540,Computational Biology Unit,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|External Id:SAMEA5752540|INSDC center name:Computational Biology Unit|INSDC first public:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|INSDC last update:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:3|common name:zebrafish|dev stage:Sphere|sample name:3|scientific name:Danio rerio,,,,,,,,,NextSeq 500 sequencing,ena EXPERIMENT Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:423 6,Sphere 1 LSU,None,RCP seq,,OTHER,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,other,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,NextSeq 500,,ERP116106,NextSeq 500 sequencing,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 08 24,,,3311799332.0,43576307.0,ena RUN Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:423 6,0:76,A:1182325939;C:888677953;G:922571204;T:318159754;N:64482,76,,,,1182325939,888677953,922571204,318159754,64482,ERX3511269,ERS3555999,ERA2100634,Computational Biology Unit|European Nucleotide Archive,Computational Biology Unit,1,0.57505,,0.24459,,0.99582,,0.43365,,76,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,nextseq,unknown,other,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Unknown,2019-07-03,Blastula,Embryo,Undetermined,Embryo Imprecise
9757,ERR3489853,ERX3511268,ERS3555999,ERP116106,PRJEB33323,Deconstructing the individual steps of vertebrate translation initiation,ena-STUDY-Computational Biology Unit-03-07-2019-10:11:34:314-422,Other,In eukaryotes  the number of ribosomes synthesizing a given protein depends on how many are recruited to its mRNA  their success in navigating its five prime untranslated region UTR and whether they recognize its start codon. Initiation of translation is a rate limiting step in protein synthesis and key to gene expression control 1  but despite this centrality it remains poorly understood 2 3. Here we introduce ribosome complex profiling RCP seq to capture the transcriptome wide occupancy of scanning  initiating  elongating and terminating ribosome complexes in a higher eukaryote. We track scanning and elongating ribosomes across all five prime UTRs in zebrafish  which enable us to assess the individual regulatory contributions from the three stages of initiation: ribosome recruitment  scanning of the five prime UTR and recognition of the start codon. Our data sheds light on small subunit recruitment to mRNAs presenting evidence for the threading model and demonstrates that sequence features regulate this recruitment. We estimate the processivity of scanning ribosomes as they traverse the five prime UTR and show that the repressive effects of upstream open reading frames depend on the efficiency of both translation initiation and termination. Finally  we determine the optimal initiation contexts by directly estimating the conversion of scanning to elongating ribosomes and demonstrate specific regulation of translation initiation at the endoplasmic reticulum. Our results open for the possibility of deconvoluting translation initiation into separate stages and provides the first view of global occupancy of ribosomal small subunits in a vertebrate.,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03,,,Sphere 1,SAMEA5752540,Computational Biology Unit,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|External Id:SAMEA5752540|INSDC center name:Computational Biology Unit|INSDC first public:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|INSDC last update:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:3|common name:zebrafish|dev stage:Sphere|sample name:3|scientific name:Danio rerio,,,,,,,,,NextSeq 500 sequencing,ena EXPERIMENT Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:423 5,Sphere 1 SSU,None,RCP seq,,OTHER,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,other,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,NextSeq 500,,ERP116106,NextSeq 500 sequencing,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 08 22,,,7403181508.0,97410283.0,ena RUN Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:423 5,0:76,A:4338227974;C:1233250165;G:1372229712;T:459322295;N:151362,76,,,,4338227974,1233250165,1372229712,459322295,151362,ERX3511268,ERS3555999,ERA2100634,Computational Biology Unit|European Nucleotide Archive,Computational Biology Unit,1,0.765,,0.44747,,0.99515,,0.12467,,76,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,nextseq,unknown,other,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Unknown,2019-07-03,Blastula,Embryo,Undetermined,Embryo Imprecise
9758,ERR3489852,ERX3511267,ERS3555998,ERP116106,PRJEB33323,Deconstructing the individual steps of vertebrate translation initiation,ena-STUDY-Computational Biology Unit-03-07-2019-10:11:34:314-422,Other,In eukaryotes  the number of ribosomes synthesizing a given protein depends on how many are recruited to its mRNA  their success in navigating its five prime untranslated region UTR and whether they recognize its start codon. Initiation of translation is a rate limiting step in protein synthesis and key to gene expression control 1  but despite this centrality it remains poorly understood 2 3. Here we introduce ribosome complex profiling RCP seq to capture the transcriptome wide occupancy of scanning  initiating  elongating and terminating ribosome complexes in a higher eukaryote. We track scanning and elongating ribosomes across all five prime UTRs in zebrafish  which enable us to assess the individual regulatory contributions from the three stages of initiation: ribosome recruitment  scanning of the five prime UTR and recognition of the start codon. Our data sheds light on small subunit recruitment to mRNAs presenting evidence for the threading model and demonstrates that sequence features regulate this recruitment. We estimate the processivity of scanning ribosomes as they traverse the five prime UTR and show that the repressive effects of upstream open reading frames depend on the efficiency of both translation initiation and termination. Finally  we determine the optimal initiation contexts by directly estimating the conversion of scanning to elongating ribosomes and demonstrate specific regulation of translation initiation at the endoplasmic reticulum. Our results open for the possibility of deconvoluting translation initiation into separate stages and provides the first view of global occupancy of ribosomal small subunits in a vertebrate.,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03,,,64 cell 2,SAMEA5752539,Computational Biology Unit,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|External Id:SAMEA5752539|INSDC center name:Computational Biology Unit|INSDC first public:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|INSDC last update:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:2|common name:zebrafish|dev stage:64 cell|sample name:2|scientific name:Danio rerio,,,,,,,,,NextSeq 500 sequencing,ena EXPERIMENT Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:423 4,64 cell 2 LSU,None,RCP seq,,OTHER,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,other,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,NextSeq 500,,ERP116106,NextSeq 500 sequencing,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 08 22,,,11722578884.0,154244459.0,ena RUN Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:423 4,0:76,A:8175036829;C:1396062240;G:1882846539;T:268587131;N:46145,76,,,,8175036829,1396062240,1882846539,268587131,46145,ERX3511267,ERS3555998,ERA2100634,Computational Biology Unit|European Nucleotide Archive,Computational Biology Unit,1,0.81133,,0.41331,,0.99823,,0.03453,,76,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,nextseq,unknown,other,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Unknown,2019-07-03,Cleavage,Embryo,Undetermined,Embryo Imprecise
9759,ERR3489851,ERX3511266,ERS3555998,ERP116106,PRJEB33323,Deconstructing the individual steps of vertebrate translation initiation,ena-STUDY-Computational Biology Unit-03-07-2019-10:11:34:314-422,Other,In eukaryotes  the number of ribosomes synthesizing a given protein depends on how many are recruited to its mRNA  their success in navigating its five prime untranslated region UTR and whether they recognize its start codon. Initiation of translation is a rate limiting step in protein synthesis and key to gene expression control 1  but despite this centrality it remains poorly understood 2 3. Here we introduce ribosome complex profiling RCP seq to capture the transcriptome wide occupancy of scanning  initiating  elongating and terminating ribosome complexes in a higher eukaryote. We track scanning and elongating ribosomes across all five prime UTRs in zebrafish  which enable us to assess the individual regulatory contributions from the three stages of initiation: ribosome recruitment  scanning of the five prime UTR and recognition of the start codon. Our data sheds light on small subunit recruitment to mRNAs presenting evidence for the threading model and demonstrates that sequence features regulate this recruitment. We estimate the processivity of scanning ribosomes as they traverse the five prime UTR and show that the repressive effects of upstream open reading frames depend on the efficiency of both translation initiation and termination. Finally  we determine the optimal initiation contexts by directly estimating the conversion of scanning to elongating ribosomes and demonstrate specific regulation of translation initiation at the endoplasmic reticulum. Our results open for the possibility of deconvoluting translation initiation into separate stages and provides the first view of global occupancy of ribosomal small subunits in a vertebrate.,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03,,,64 cell 2,SAMEA5752539,Computational Biology Unit,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|External Id:SAMEA5752539|INSDC center name:Computational Biology Unit|INSDC first public:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|INSDC last update:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:2|common name:zebrafish|dev stage:64 cell|sample name:2|scientific name:Danio rerio,,,,,,,,,NextSeq 500 sequencing,ena EXPERIMENT Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:423 3,64 cell 2 SSU,None,RCP seq,,OTHER,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,other,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,NextSeq 500,,ERP116106,NextSeq 500 sequencing,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 08 22,,,9525478088.0,125335238.0,ena RUN Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:423 3,0:76,A:4813606784;C:2048902072;G:2140220088;T:522714000;N:35144,76,,,,4813606784,2048902072,2140220088,522714000,35144,ERX3511266,ERS3555998,ERA2100634,Computational Biology Unit|European Nucleotide Archive,Computational Biology Unit,1,0.59747,,0.26784,,0.996,,0.21193,,76,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,nextseq,unknown,other,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Unknown,2019-07-03,Cleavage,Embryo,Undetermined,Embryo Imprecise
9760,ERR3489850,ERX3511265,ERS3555997,ERP116106,PRJEB33323,Deconstructing the individual steps of vertebrate translation initiation,ena-STUDY-Computational Biology Unit-03-07-2019-10:11:34:314-422,Other,In eukaryotes  the number of ribosomes synthesizing a given protein depends on how many are recruited to its mRNA  their success in navigating its five prime untranslated region UTR and whether they recognize its start codon. Initiation of translation is a rate limiting step in protein synthesis and key to gene expression control 1  but despite this centrality it remains poorly understood 2 3. Here we introduce ribosome complex profiling RCP seq to capture the transcriptome wide occupancy of scanning  initiating  elongating and terminating ribosome complexes in a higher eukaryote. We track scanning and elongating ribosomes across all five prime UTRs in zebrafish  which enable us to assess the individual regulatory contributions from the three stages of initiation: ribosome recruitment  scanning of the five prime UTR and recognition of the start codon. Our data sheds light on small subunit recruitment to mRNAs presenting evidence for the threading model and demonstrates that sequence features regulate this recruitment. We estimate the processivity of scanning ribosomes as they traverse the five prime UTR and show that the repressive effects of upstream open reading frames depend on the efficiency of both translation initiation and termination. Finally  we determine the optimal initiation contexts by directly estimating the conversion of scanning to elongating ribosomes and demonstrate specific regulation of translation initiation at the endoplasmic reticulum. Our results open for the possibility of deconvoluting translation initiation into separate stages and provides the first view of global occupancy of ribosomal small subunits in a vertebrate.,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03,,,64 cell 1,SAMEA5752538,Computational Biology Unit,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|External Id:SAMEA5752538|INSDC center name:Computational Biology Unit|INSDC first public:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|INSDC last update:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:1|common name:zebrafish|dev stage:64 cell|sample name:1|scientific name:Danio rerio,,,,,,,,,NextSeq 500 sequencing,ena EXPERIMENT Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:423 2,64 cell 1 LSU,None,RCP seq,,OTHER,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,other,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,NextSeq 500,,ERP116106,NextSeq 500 sequencing,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 08 22,,,8544157652.0,112423127.0,ena RUN Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:423 2,0:76,A:2633354802;C:2582123846;G:2505786164;T:822713754;N:179086,76,,,,2633354802,2582123846,2505786164,822713754,179086,ERX3511265,ERS3555997,ERA2100634,Computational Biology Unit|European Nucleotide Archive,Computational Biology Unit,1,0.34707,,0.02129,,0.99797,,0.62478,,76,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,nextseq,unknown,other,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Unknown,2019-07-03,Cleavage,Embryo,Undetermined,Embryo Imprecise
9761,ERR3489849,ERX3511264,ERS3555997,ERP116106,PRJEB33323,Deconstructing the individual steps of vertebrate translation initiation,ena-STUDY-Computational Biology Unit-03-07-2019-10:11:34:314-422,Other,In eukaryotes  the number of ribosomes synthesizing a given protein depends on how many are recruited to its mRNA  their success in navigating its five prime untranslated region UTR and whether they recognize its start codon. Initiation of translation is a rate limiting step in protein synthesis and key to gene expression control 1  but despite this centrality it remains poorly understood 2 3. Here we introduce ribosome complex profiling RCP seq to capture the transcriptome wide occupancy of scanning  initiating  elongating and terminating ribosome complexes in a higher eukaryote. We track scanning and elongating ribosomes across all five prime UTRs in zebrafish  which enable us to assess the individual regulatory contributions from the three stages of initiation: ribosome recruitment  scanning of the five prime UTR and recognition of the start codon. Our data sheds light on small subunit recruitment to mRNAs presenting evidence for the threading model and demonstrates that sequence features regulate this recruitment. We estimate the processivity of scanning ribosomes as they traverse the five prime UTR and show that the repressive effects of upstream open reading frames depend on the efficiency of both translation initiation and termination. Finally  we determine the optimal initiation contexts by directly estimating the conversion of scanning to elongating ribosomes and demonstrate specific regulation of translation initiation at the endoplasmic reticulum. Our results open for the possibility of deconvoluting translation initiation into separate stages and provides the first view of global occupancy of ribosomal small subunits in a vertebrate.,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03,,,64 cell 1,SAMEA5752538,Computational Biology Unit,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|External Id:SAMEA5752538|INSDC center name:Computational Biology Unit|INSDC first public:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|INSDC last update:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:1|common name:zebrafish|dev stage:64 cell|sample name:1|scientific name:Danio rerio,,,,,,,,,NextSeq 500 sequencing,ena EXPERIMENT Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:423 1,64 cell 1 SSU,None,RCP seq,,OTHER,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,other,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,NextSeq 500,,ERP116106,NextSeq 500 sequencing,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 08 22,run7_64_cell_SSU_12_13_14.fastq.gz,fastq,10139466432.0,133414032.0,ena RUN Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:423 1,0:76 1:0,A:4628193785;C:2494821868;G:2485640988;T:530605907;N:203884,76,0,,,4628193785,2494821868,2485640988,530605907,203884,ERX3511264,ERS3555997,ERA2100634,Computational Biology Unit|European Nucleotide Archive,Computational Biology Unit,1,0.06893,,0.02559,,0.99766,,0.90567,,76,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,nextseq,unknown,other,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Unknown,2019-07-03,Cleavage,Embryo,Undetermined,Embryo Imprecise
9762,ERR3413870,ERX3437516,ERS3555997,ERP116106,PRJEB33323,Deconstructing the individual steps of vertebrate translation initiation,ena-STUDY-Computational Biology Unit-03-07-2019-10:11:34:314-422,Other,In eukaryotes  the number of ribosomes synthesizing a given protein depends on how many are recruited to its mRNA  their success in navigating its five prime untranslated region UTR and whether they recognize its start codon. Initiation of translation is a rate limiting step in protein synthesis and key to gene expression control 1  but despite this centrality it remains poorly understood 2 3. Here we introduce ribosome complex profiling RCP seq to capture the transcriptome wide occupancy of scanning  initiating  elongating and terminating ribosome complexes in a higher eukaryote. We track scanning and elongating ribosomes across all five prime UTRs in zebrafish  which enable us to assess the individual regulatory contributions from the three stages of initiation: ribosome recruitment  scanning of the five prime UTR and recognition of the start codon. Our data sheds light on small subunit recruitment to mRNAs presenting evidence for the threading model and demonstrates that sequence features regulate this recruitment. We estimate the processivity of scanning ribosomes as they traverse the five prime UTR and show that the repressive effects of upstream open reading frames depend on the efficiency of both translation initiation and termination. Finally  we determine the optimal initiation contexts by directly estimating the conversion of scanning to elongating ribosomes and demonstrate specific regulation of translation initiation at the endoplasmic reticulum. Our results open for the possibility of deconvoluting translation initiation into separate stages and provides the first view of global occupancy of ribosomal small subunits in a vertebrate.,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03,,,64 cell 1,SAMEA5752538,Computational Biology Unit,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|External Id:SAMEA5752538|INSDC center name:Computational Biology Unit|INSDC first public:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|INSDC last update:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:1|common name:zebrafish|dev stage:64 cell|sample name:1|scientific name:Danio rerio,,,,,,,,,NextSeq 500 sequencing,ena EXPERIMENT Computational Biology Unit 03 07 2019 14:45:09:705 2,64 cell 1 LSU,None,RCP seq,,OTHER,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,other,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,NextSeq 500,,ERP116106,NextSeq 500 sequencing,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03,,,8544157652.0,112423127.0,ena RUN Computational Biology Unit 03 07 2019 14:45:09:705 2,0:76,A:2633354802;C:2582123846;G:2505786164;T:822713754;N:179086,76,,,,2633354802,2582123846,2505786164,822713754,179086,ERX3437516,ERS3555997,ERA2028987,Computational Biology Unit|European Nucleotide Archive,Computational Biology Unit,1,0.34696,,0.02086,,0.99795,,0.66261,,76,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,nextseq,unknown,other,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Unknown,2019-07-03,Cleavage,Embryo,Undetermined,Embryo Imprecise
9763,ERR3413869,ERX3437515,ERS3555997,ERP116106,PRJEB33323,Deconstructing the individual steps of vertebrate translation initiation,ena-STUDY-Computational Biology Unit-03-07-2019-10:11:34:314-422,Other,In eukaryotes  the number of ribosomes synthesizing a given protein depends on how many are recruited to its mRNA  their success in navigating its five prime untranslated region UTR and whether they recognize its start codon. Initiation of translation is a rate limiting step in protein synthesis and key to gene expression control 1  but despite this centrality it remains poorly understood 2 3. Here we introduce ribosome complex profiling RCP seq to capture the transcriptome wide occupancy of scanning  initiating  elongating and terminating ribosome complexes in a higher eukaryote. We track scanning and elongating ribosomes across all five prime UTRs in zebrafish  which enable us to assess the individual regulatory contributions from the three stages of initiation: ribosome recruitment  scanning of the five prime UTR and recognition of the start codon. Our data sheds light on small subunit recruitment to mRNAs presenting evidence for the threading model and demonstrates that sequence features regulate this recruitment. We estimate the processivity of scanning ribosomes as they traverse the five prime UTR and show that the repressive effects of upstream open reading frames depend on the efficiency of both translation initiation and termination. Finally  we determine the optimal initiation contexts by directly estimating the conversion of scanning to elongating ribosomes and demonstrate specific regulation of translation initiation at the endoplasmic reticulum. Our results open for the possibility of deconvoluting translation initiation into separate stages and provides the first view of global occupancy of ribosomal small subunits in a vertebrate.,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03,,,64 cell 1,SAMEA5752538,Computational Biology Unit,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|External Id:SAMEA5752538|INSDC center name:Computational Biology Unit|INSDC first public:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|INSDC last update:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:1|common name:zebrafish|dev stage:64 cell|sample name:1|scientific name:Danio rerio,,,,,,,,,NextSeq 500 sequencing,ena EXPERIMENT Computational Biology Unit 03 07 2019 14:45:09:705 1,64 cell 1 SSU,None,RCP seq,,OTHER,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,other,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,NextSeq 500,,ERP116106,NextSeq 500 sequencing,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03,,,10139466432.0,133414032.0,ena RUN Computational Biology Unit 03 07 2019 14:45:09:705 1,0:76,A:4628193785;C:2494821868;G:2485640988;T:530605907;N:203884,76,,,,4628193785,2494821868,2485640988,530605907,203884,ERX3437515,ERS3555997,ERA2028987,Computational Biology Unit|European Nucleotide Archive,Computational Biology Unit,1,0.06884,,0.02526,,0.99762,,0.89856,,76,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,nextseq,unknown,other,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Unknown,2019-07-03,Cleavage,Embryo,Undetermined,Embryo Imprecise
9918,ERR5059480,ERX4865549,ERS5523939,ERP122761,PRJEB39265,RNA dynamics during zebrafish development,ena-STUDY-CENTER FOR GENOMIC REGULATION (CRG)-06-07-2020-15:41:43:771-1183,Other,RNA dynamics during early zebrafish development,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2022 07 05|ENA LAST UPDATE:2022 07 05,,,aAM 6h rep1,JD AD30 PRPN1970901,,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2022 07 05T12:06:33Z|organism:Danio rerio|ENA LAST UPDATE:2022 07 05T12:06:33Z|scientific name:Danio rerio|common name:zebrafish|ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2022 07 05|ENA LAST UPDATE:2022 07 05,,,,,,,,,PromethION sequencing,ena EXPERIMENT CENTER FOR GENOMIC REGULATION CRG 09 01 2021 19:50:56:183 1,unspecified,1,,,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,Oligo-dT,SINGLE,OXFORD_NANOPORE,PromethION,,ERP122761,PromethION sequencing,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2022 07 05|ENA LAST UPDATE:2022 07 05,JD-AD30_PRPN197090.tar.gz,nanopore,3739882337.0,3148027.0,ena RUN CENTER FOR GENOMIC REGULATION CRG 09 01 2021 19:50:56:183 1,0:1188.01,A:1054501690;C:834193435;G:847423060;T:1003764152;N:0,1188,,,,1054501690,834193435,847423060,1003764152,0,ERX4865549,ERS5523939,ERA3206712,CENTER FOR GENOMIC REGULATION (CRG)|European Nucleotide Archive,CENTER FOR GENOMIC REGULATION (CRG),,,,,,,,,,,,B,,usable mapping rate,ont,ont,unknown,poly_a,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Spain,2022-07-05,Undetermined,Undetermined,Undetermined,Undetermined
9919,ERR5167510,ERX4972431,ERS5593364,ERP122761,PRJEB39265,RNA dynamics during zebrafish development,ena-STUDY-CENTER FOR GENOMIC REGULATION (CRG)-06-07-2020-15:41:43:771-1183,Other,RNA dynamics during early zebrafish development,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2022 07 05|ENA LAST UPDATE:2022 07 05,,,cDNA WT 2hpf rep1,JD T20 PDPN191089,,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2022 07 05T12:06:34Z|organism:Danio rerio|ENA LAST UPDATE:2022 07 05T12:06:34Z|scientific name:Danio rerio|common name:zebrafish|ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2022 07 05|ENA LAST UPDATE:2022 07 05,,,,,,,,,PromethION sequencing,ena EXPERIMENT CENTER FOR GENOMIC REGULATION CRG 21 01 2021 22:16:50:154 1,unspecified,1,,,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,Oligo-dT,SINGLE,OXFORD_NANOPORE,PromethION,,ERP122761,PromethION sequencing,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2022 07 05|ENA LAST UPDATE:2022 07 05,,,,,ena RUN CENTER FOR GENOMIC REGULATION CRG 21 01 2021 22:16:50:154 1,,,,,,,,,,,,ERX4972431,,ERA3319053,CENTER FOR GENOMIC REGULATION (CRG)|European Nucleotide Archive,CENTER FOR GENOMIC REGULATION (CRG),,,,,,,,,,,,,,,ont,ont,unknown,poly_a,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Spain,2022-07-05,Cleavage,Embryo,Undetermined,Embryo Imprecise
9920,ERR4330695,ERX4277529,ERS4811113,ERP122761,PRJEB39265,RNA dynamics during zebrafish development,ena-STUDY-CENTER FOR GENOMIC REGULATION (CRG)-06-07-2020-15:41:43:771-1183,Other,RNA dynamics during early zebrafish development,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2022 07 05|ENA LAST UPDATE:2022 07 05,,WT 2h rep1,WT 2h rep1,SAMEA7050483,CENTER FOR GENOMIC REGULATION (CRG),ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2022 07 05|ENA LAST UPDATE:2022 07 05|External Id:SAMEA7050483|INSDC center alias:CENTER FOR GENOMIC REGULATION CRG|INSDC center name:CENTER FOR GENOMIC REGULATION CRG|INSDC first public:2022 07 05T12:06:22Z|INSDC last update:2022 07 05T12:06:22Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:JD B2 PDBN005727|common name:zebrafish|sample name:JD B2 PDBN005727,,,,,,,,,PromethION sequencing,ena EXPERIMENT CENTER FOR GENOMIC REGULATION CRG 09 07 2020 13:48:01:100 1,unspecified,1,,,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,Oligo-dT,SINGLE,OXFORD_NANOPORE,PromethION,,ERP122761,PromethION sequencing,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2022 07 05|ENA LAST UPDATE:2022 07 05,JD-B2_PDBN005727.tar.gz,fastq,,,ena RUN CENTER FOR GENOMIC REGULATION CRG 09 07 2020 13:48:01:100 1,,,,,,,,,,,,ERX4277529,,ERA2767154,CENTER FOR GENOMIC REGULATION (CRG)|European Nucleotide Archive,CENTER FOR GENOMIC REGULATION (CRG),,,,,,,,,,,,,,,ont,ont,unknown,poly_a,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Spain,2022-07-05,Undetermined,Undetermined,Undetermined,Undetermined
9921,ERR4327134,ERX4273968,ERS4808634,ERP122761,PRJEB39265,RNA dynamics during zebrafish development,ena-STUDY-CENTER FOR GENOMIC REGULATION (CRG)-06-07-2020-15:41:43:771-1183,Other,RNA dynamics during early zebrafish development,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2022 07 05|ENA LAST UPDATE:2022 07 05,,WT 4h rep2,WT 4h rep2,SAMEA7048000,CENTER FOR GENOMIC REGULATION (CRG),ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2022 07 05|ENA LAST UPDATE:2022 07 05|External Id:SAMEA7048000|INSDC center alias:CENTER FOR GENOMIC REGULATION CRG|INSDC center name:CENTER FOR GENOMIC REGULATION CRG|INSDC first public:2022 07 05T12:06:22Z|INSDC last update:2022 07 05T12:06:22Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:JD AM39 PDBN042841|common name:zebrafish|sample name:JD AM39 PDBN042841,,,,,,,,,PromethION sequencing,ena EXPERIMENT CENTER FOR GENOMIC REGULATION CRG 07 07 2020 16:36:02:084 1,unspecified,1,,,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,Oligo-dT,SINGLE,OXFORD_NANOPORE,PromethION,,ERP122761,PromethION sequencing,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2022 07 05|ENA LAST UPDATE:2022 07 05,JD-AM39_PDBN042841.tar.gz,nanopore,719646261.0,897768.0,ena RUN CENTER FOR GENOMIC REGULATION CRG 07 07 2020 16:36:02:084 1,0:801.59,A:210217908;C:152963718;G:157393834;T:199070801;N:0,801,,,,210217908,152963718,157393834,199070801,0,ERX4273968,ERS4808634,ERA2764800,CENTER FOR GENOMIC REGULATION (CRG)|European Nucleotide Archive,CENTER FOR GENOMIC REGULATION (CRG),,,,,,,,,,,,T,,under 1.2% mapping rate,ont,ont,unknown,poly_a,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Spain,2022-07-05,Undetermined,Undetermined,Undetermined,Undetermined
9922,ERR4330696,ERX4277530,ERS4811114,ERP122761,PRJEB39265,RNA dynamics during zebrafish development,ena-STUDY-CENTER FOR GENOMIC REGULATION (CRG)-06-07-2020-15:41:43:771-1183,Other,RNA dynamics during early zebrafish development,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2022 07 05|ENA LAST UPDATE:2022 07 05,,WT 4h rep1,WT 4h rep1,JD C3 PDBN006177,,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2022 07 05T12:06:22Z|organism:Danio rerio|ENA LAST UPDATE:2022 07 05T12:06:22Z|scientific name:Danio rerio|common name:zebrafish|ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2022 07 05|ENA LAST UPDATE:2022 07 05,,,,,,,,,PromethION sequencing,ena EXPERIMENT CENTER FOR GENOMIC REGULATION CRG 09 07 2020 13:48:01:100 2,unspecified,1,,,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,Oligo-dT,SINGLE,OXFORD_NANOPORE,PromethION,,ERP122761,PromethION sequencing,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2022 07 05|ENA LAST UPDATE:2022 07 05,JD-C3_PDBN006177.tar.gz,nanopore,4240799932.0,4331689.0,ena RUN CENTER FOR GENOMIC REGULATION CRG 09 07 2020 13:48:01:100 2,0:979.02,A:1229803846;C:914476674;G:943703560;T:1152815852;N:0,979,,,,1229803846,914476674,943703560,1152815852,0,ERX4277530,ERS4811114,ERA2767154,CENTER FOR GENOMIC REGULATION (CRG)|European Nucleotide Archive,CENTER FOR GENOMIC REGULATION (CRG),,,,,,,,,,,,B,,usable mapping rate,ont,ont,unknown,poly_a,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Spain,2022-07-05,Undetermined,Undetermined,Undetermined,Undetermined
9923,ERR4327135,ERX4273969,ERS4808635,ERP122761,PRJEB39265,RNA dynamics during zebrafish development,ena-STUDY-CENTER FOR GENOMIC REGULATION (CRG)-06-07-2020-15:41:43:771-1183,Other,RNA dynamics during early zebrafish development,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2022 07 05|ENA LAST UPDATE:2022 07 05,,WT 6h rep1,WT 6h rep1,JD AC29 PDBN024889,,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2022 07 05T12:06:22Z|organism:Danio rerio|ENA LAST UPDATE:2022 07 05T12:06:22Z|scientific name:Danio rerio|common name:zebrafish|ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2022 07 05|ENA LAST UPDATE:2022 07 05,,,,,,,,,PromethION sequencing,ena EXPERIMENT CENTER FOR GENOMIC REGULATION CRG 07 07 2020 16:36:02:084 2,unspecified,1,,,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,Oligo-dT,SINGLE,OXFORD_NANOPORE,PromethION,,ERP122761,PromethION sequencing,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2022 07 05|ENA LAST UPDATE:2022 07 05,JD-AC29_PDBN024889.tar.gz,nanopore,1900324756.0,2013035.0,ena RUN CENTER FOR GENOMIC REGULATION CRG 07 07 2020 16:36:02:084 2,0:944.01,A:549431032;C:411510218;G:422103800;T:517279706;N:0,944,,,,549431032,411510218,422103800,517279706,0,ERX4273969,ERS4808635,ERA2764800,CENTER FOR GENOMIC REGULATION (CRG)|European Nucleotide Archive,CENTER FOR GENOMIC REGULATION (CRG),,,,,,,,,,,,T,,long read,ont,ont,unknown,poly_a,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Spain,2022-07-05,Undetermined,Undetermined,Undetermined,Undetermined
9924,ERR4326350,ERX4273208,ERS4808398,ERP122761,PRJEB39265,RNA dynamics during zebrafish development,ena-STUDY-CENTER FOR GENOMIC REGULATION (CRG)-06-07-2020-15:41:43:771-1183,Other,RNA dynamics during early zebrafish development,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2022 07 05|ENA LAST UPDATE:2022 07 05,,430 LNA 6h rep1,430 LNA 6h rep1,SAMEA7047764,CENTER FOR GENOMIC REGULATION (CRG),ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2022 07 05|ENA LAST UPDATE:2022 07 05|External Id:SAMEA7047764|INSDC center alias:CENTER FOR GENOMIC REGULATION CRG|INSDC center name:CENTER FOR GENOMIC REGULATION CRG|INSDC first public:2022 07 05T12:06:22Z|INSDC last update:2022 07 05T12:06:22Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:JD H8 PDBN059569|common name:zebrafish|sample name:JD H8 PDBN059569,,,,,,,,,PromethION sequencing,ena EXPERIMENT CENTER FOR GENOMIC REGULATION CRG 07 07 2020 10:25:22:388 1,unspecified,1,,,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,Oligo-dT,SINGLE,OXFORD_NANOPORE,PromethION,,ERP122761,PromethION sequencing,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2022 07 05|ENA LAST UPDATE:2022 07 05,JD-H8_PDBN059569.tar.gz,nanopore,722817654.0,657296.0,ena RUN CENTER FOR GENOMIC REGULATION CRG 07 07 2020 10:25:22:388 1,0:1099.68,A:206996491;C:157022109;G:155085437;T:203713617;N:0,1099,,,,206996491,157022109,155085437,203713617,0,ERX4273208,ERS4808398,ERA2764399,CENTER FOR GENOMIC REGULATION (CRG)|European Nucleotide Archive,CENTER FOR GENOMIC REGULATION (CRG),,,,,,,,,,,,T,,under 1.2% mapping rate,ont,ont,unknown,poly_a,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Spain,2022-07-05,Undetermined,Undetermined,Undetermined,Undetermined
9925,ERR4335436,ERX4282181,ERS4818366,ERP122761,PRJEB39265,RNA dynamics during zebrafish development,ena-STUDY-CENTER FOR GENOMIC REGULATION (CRG)-06-07-2020-15:41:43:771-1183,Other,RNA dynamics during early zebrafish development,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2022 07 05|ENA LAST UPDATE:2022 07 05,,WT 6h rep2,WT 6h rep2,JD W23 PRPN039928,,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2022 07 05T12:06:24Z|organism:Danio rerio|ENA LAST UPDATE:2022 07 05T12:06:24Z|scientific name:Danio rerio|common name:zebrafish|ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2022 07 05|ENA LAST UPDATE:2022 07 05,,,,,,,,,PromethION sequencing,ena EXPERIMENT CENTER FOR GENOMIC REGULATION CRG 13 07 2020 18:19:23:456 1,unspecified,1,,,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,Oligo-dT,SINGLE,OXFORD_NANOPORE,PromethION,,ERP122761,PromethION sequencing,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2022 07 05|ENA LAST UPDATE:2022 07 05,JD-W23_PRPN039928.tar.gz,nanopore,1268761319.0,1385621.0,ena RUN CENTER FOR GENOMIC REGULATION CRG 13 07 2020 18:19:23:457 1,0:915.66,A:366823862;C:275507684;G:284634548;T:341795225;N:0,915,,,,366823862,275507684,284634548,341795225,0,ERX4282181,ERS4818366,ERA2769006,CENTER FOR GENOMIC REGULATION (CRG)|European Nucleotide Archive,CENTER FOR GENOMIC REGULATION (CRG),,,,,,,,,,,,T,,under 1.2% mapping rate,ont,ont,unknown,poly_a,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Spain,2022-07-05,Undetermined,Undetermined,Undetermined,Undetermined
9926,ERR4321680,ERX4268538,ERS4808125,ERP122761,PRJEB39265,RNA dynamics during zebrafish development,ena-STUDY-CENTER FOR GENOMIC REGULATION (CRG)-06-07-2020-15:41:43:771-1183,Other,RNA dynamics during early zebrafish development,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2022 07 05|ENA LAST UPDATE:2022 07 05,,WT 0h rep1,WT 0h rep1,JD A1 GDDN003032,,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2022 07 05T12:06:22Z|organism:Danio rerio|ENA LAST UPDATE:2022 07 05T12:06:22Z|scientific name:Danio rerio|common name:zebrafish|ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2022 07 05|ENA LAST UPDATE:2022 07 05,,,,,,,,,GridION sequencing,ena EXPERIMENT CENTER FOR GENOMIC REGULATION CRG 06 07 2020 17:45:26:236 1,unspecified,1,,,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,Oligo-dT,SINGLE,OXFORD_NANOPORE,GridION,,ERP122761,GridION sequencing,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2022 07 05|ENA LAST UPDATE:2022 07 05,JD-A1_GDDN003032.tar.gz,nanopore,753417826.0,698774.0,ena RUN CENTER FOR GENOMIC REGULATION CRG 06 07 2020 17:45:26:236 1,0:1078.20,A:214525685;C:165042952;G:171160615;T:202688574;N:0,1078,,,,214525685,165042952,171160615,202688574,0,ERX4268538,ERS4808125,ERA2763718,CENTER FOR GENOMIC REGULATION (CRG)|European Nucleotide Archive,CENTER FOR GENOMIC REGULATION (CRG),,,,,,,,,,,,T,,long read,ont,ont,unknown,poly_a,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Spain,2022-07-05,Undetermined,Undetermined,Undetermined,Undetermined
9951,ERR5961093,ERX5601614,ERS6490233,ERP123184,PRJEB39643,CRISPR tools for zebrafish,ena-STUDY-UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA - DAVIS-29-07-2020-18:23:16:380-2095,Other,Zebrafish have practical features that make them a useful model for higher throughput tests of gene function using CRISPR/Cas9 editing to create 'knockout' models. A large number of computational and empirical tools exist to design CRISPR assays but often produce varied predictions across methods. To systematically assess accuracy of tool predictions of on  and off target gene editing  we subjected zebrafish embryos to CRISPR/Cas9 with 50 different guide RNAs gRNAs targeting 14 genes. We compared our experimental in vivo editing efficiencies in mosaic G0 embryos with those predicted by seven commonly used gRNA design tools and found large discrepancies between methods. Assessing off target mutations predicted in silico and in vitro found that the majority of tested loci had low in vivo frequencies <1%. To characterize if commonly used 'mock' CRISPR controls larvae injected with Cas9 enzyme or mRNA with no gRNA exhibited spurious molecular features that might exacerbate studies of G0 mosaic CRISPR knockout fish  we generated an RNA seq dataset of various control larvae at 5 dpf From this  while we found no evidence of spontaneous somatic mutations of injected larvae  we did identify several hundreds of differentially expressed genes with high variability between injection types. Network analyses of shared differentially expressed genes in the 'mock' injected larvae implicated a number of key regulators of common metabolic pathways  and gene ontology analysis revealed connections with response to wounding and cytoskeleton organization  highlighting a potential lasting effect from the microinjection process that requires further investigation. Overall  our results provide a valuable resource for the zebrafish community for the design and execution of CRISPR/Cas9 experiments.,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 10 31|ENA LAST UPDATE:2021 05 25,,RNA seq data of 5dpf larvae uninjected controls from the same batch.,Uninjected2,Uninjected2,,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2021 12 14|ENA LAST UPDATE:2021 12 14,,,,,,,,,Illumina HiSeq 4000 paired end sequencing,ena EXPERIMENT UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   DAVIS 25 05 2021 08:56:51:032 8,unspecified,1,,,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,Oligo-dT,PAIRED,ILLUMINA,Illumina HiSeq 4000,,ERP123184,Illumina HiSeq 4000 paired end sequencing,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2021 12 14|ENA LAST UPDATE:2021 12 14,,,,,ena RUN UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   DAVIS 25 05 2021 08:56:51:032 8,,,,,,,,,,,,ERX5601614,,ERA4417635,UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA - DAVIS|European Nucleotide Archive,UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA - DAVIS,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,illumina,hiseq_era,unknown,poly_a,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,United States,2020-10-31,Larval,Larval,Undetermined,Undetermined
9952,ERR5961092,ERX5601613,ERS6490232,ERP123184,PRJEB39643,CRISPR tools for zebrafish,ena-STUDY-UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA - DAVIS-29-07-2020-18:23:16:380-2095,Other,Zebrafish have practical features that make them a useful model for higher throughput tests of gene function using CRISPR/Cas9 editing to create 'knockout' models. A large number of computational and empirical tools exist to design CRISPR assays but often produce varied predictions across methods. To systematically assess accuracy of tool predictions of on  and off target gene editing  we subjected zebrafish embryos to CRISPR/Cas9 with 50 different guide RNAs gRNAs targeting 14 genes. We compared our experimental in vivo editing efficiencies in mosaic G0 embryos with those predicted by seven commonly used gRNA design tools and found large discrepancies between methods. Assessing off target mutations predicted in silico and in vitro found that the majority of tested loci had low in vivo frequencies <1%. To characterize if commonly used 'mock' CRISPR controls larvae injected with Cas9 enzyme or mRNA with no gRNA exhibited spurious molecular features that might exacerbate studies of G0 mosaic CRISPR knockout fish  we generated an RNA seq dataset of various control larvae at 5 dpf From this  while we found no evidence of spontaneous somatic mutations of injected larvae  we did identify several hundreds of differentially expressed genes with high variability between injection types. Network analyses of shared differentially expressed genes in the 'mock' injected larvae implicated a number of key regulators of common metabolic pathways  and gene ontology analysis revealed connections with response to wounding and cytoskeleton organization  highlighting a potential lasting effect from the microinjection process that requires further investigation. Overall  our results provide a valuable resource for the zebrafish community for the design and execution of CRISPR/Cas9 experiments.,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 10 31|ENA LAST UPDATE:2021 05 25,,RNA seq data of 5dpf larvae uninjected controls from the same batch.,Uninjected1,SAMEA8805898,UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA - DAVIS,ENA first public:2021 06 23|ENA last update:2021 06 23|External Id:SAMEA8805898|INSDC center alias:UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   DAVIS|INSDC center name:UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   DAVIS|INSDC first public:2021 06 23T08:18:31Z|INSDC last update:2021 06 23T08:18:31Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:Uninjected1|common name:zebrafish|sample name:Uninjected1,,,,,,,,,Illumina HiSeq 4000 paired end sequencing,ena EXPERIMENT UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   DAVIS 25 05 2021 08:56:51:032 7,unspecified,1,,,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,Oligo-dT,PAIRED,ILLUMINA,Illumina HiSeq 4000,,ERP123184,Illumina HiSeq 4000 paired end sequencing,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2021 06 23|ENA LAST UPDATE:2021 06 23,WT1_R1_001.fastq WT1_R2_001.fastq,fastq fastq,5664550800.0,18881836.0,ena RUN UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   DAVIS 25 05 2021 08:56:51:032 7,0:150 1:150,A:1493322675;C:1337347146;G:1388414458;T:1444981758;N:484763,150,150,,,1493322675,1337347146,1388414458,1444981758,484763,ERX5601613,ERS6490232,ERA4417635,UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA - DAVIS|European Nucleotide Archive,UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA - DAVIS,2,0.95769,0.95822,0.04407,0.04391,0.69934,0.69958,0.4411,0.45319,150,150,B,B,biological fallback assumption,illumina,hiseq_era,unknown,poly_a,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,United States,2020-10-31,Larval,Larval,Undetermined,Undetermined
9953,ERR5961096,ERX5601617,ERS6490236,ERP123184,PRJEB39643,CRISPR tools for zebrafish,ena-STUDY-UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA - DAVIS-29-07-2020-18:23:16:380-2095,Other,Zebrafish have practical features that make them a useful model for higher throughput tests of gene function using CRISPR/Cas9 editing to create 'knockout' models. A large number of computational and empirical tools exist to design CRISPR assays but often produce varied predictions across methods. To systematically assess accuracy of tool predictions of on  and off target gene editing  we subjected zebrafish embryos to CRISPR/Cas9 with 50 different guide RNAs gRNAs targeting 14 genes. We compared our experimental in vivo editing efficiencies in mosaic G0 embryos with those predicted by seven commonly used gRNA design tools and found large discrepancies between methods. Assessing off target mutations predicted in silico and in vitro found that the majority of tested loci had low in vivo frequencies <1%. To characterize if commonly used 'mock' CRISPR controls larvae injected with Cas9 enzyme or mRNA with no gRNA exhibited spurious molecular features that might exacerbate studies of G0 mosaic CRISPR knockout fish  we generated an RNA seq dataset of various control larvae at 5 dpf From this  while we found no evidence of spontaneous somatic mutations of injected larvae  we did identify several hundreds of differentially expressed genes with high variability between injection types. Network analyses of shared differentially expressed genes in the 'mock' injected larvae implicated a number of key regulators of common metabolic pathways  and gene ontology analysis revealed connections with response to wounding and cytoskeleton organization  highlighting a potential lasting effect from the microinjection process that requires further investigation. Overall  our results provide a valuable resource for the zebrafish community for the design and execution of CRISPR/Cas9 experiments.,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 10 31|ENA LAST UPDATE:2021 05 25,,RNA seq data of 5dpf larvae uninjected controls from the an additional batch.,Uninjected5,SAMEA8805902,UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA - DAVIS,ENA first public:2021 05 26|ENA last update:2021 05 26|External Id:SAMEA8805902|INSDC center alias:UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   DAVIS|INSDC center name:UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   DAVIS|INSDC first public:2021 05 26T09:21:17Z|INSDC last update:2021 05 26T09:21:17Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:Uninjected5|common name:zebrafish|sample name:Uninjected5,,,,,,,,,Illumina HiSeq 4000 paired end sequencing,ena EXPERIMENT UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   DAVIS 25 05 2021 08:56:51:032 11,unspecified,1,,,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,Oligo-dT,PAIRED,ILLUMINA,Illumina HiSeq 4000,,ERP123184,Illumina HiSeq 4000 paired end sequencing,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2021 05 26|ENA LAST UPDATE:2021 05 26,WT5_R1_001.fastq.gz WT5_R2_001.fastq.gz,fastq fastq,9088444200.0,30294814.0,ena RUN UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   DAVIS 25 05 2021 08:56:51:032 11,0:150 1:150,A:2404715160;C:2098546919;G:2330441921;T:2254532578;N:207622,150,150,,,2404715160,2098546919,2330441921,2254532578,207622,ERX5601617,ERS6490236,ERA4417635,UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA - DAVIS|European Nucleotide Archive,UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA - DAVIS,2,0.95076,0.93857,0.06296,0.06222,0.68485,0.70047,0.47429,0.48524,150,150,B,B,biological fallback assumption,illumina,hiseq_era,unknown,poly_a,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,United States,2020-10-31,Larval,Larval,Undetermined,Undetermined
9954,ERR5961095,ERX5601616,ERS6490235,ERP123184,PRJEB39643,CRISPR tools for zebrafish,ena-STUDY-UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA - DAVIS-29-07-2020-18:23:16:380-2095,Other,Zebrafish have practical features that make them a useful model for higher throughput tests of gene function using CRISPR/Cas9 editing to create 'knockout' models. A large number of computational and empirical tools exist to design CRISPR assays but often produce varied predictions across methods. To systematically assess accuracy of tool predictions of on  and off target gene editing  we subjected zebrafish embryos to CRISPR/Cas9 with 50 different guide RNAs gRNAs targeting 14 genes. We compared our experimental in vivo editing efficiencies in mosaic G0 embryos with those predicted by seven commonly used gRNA design tools and found large discrepancies between methods. Assessing off target mutations predicted in silico and in vitro found that the majority of tested loci had low in vivo frequencies <1%. To characterize if commonly used 'mock' CRISPR controls larvae injected with Cas9 enzyme or mRNA with no gRNA exhibited spurious molecular features that might exacerbate studies of G0 mosaic CRISPR knockout fish  we generated an RNA seq dataset of various control larvae at 5 dpf From this  while we found no evidence of spontaneous somatic mutations of injected larvae  we did identify several hundreds of differentially expressed genes with high variability between injection types. Network analyses of shared differentially expressed genes in the 'mock' injected larvae implicated a number of key regulators of common metabolic pathways  and gene ontology analysis revealed connections with response to wounding and cytoskeleton organization  highlighting a potential lasting effect from the microinjection process that requires further investigation. Overall  our results provide a valuable resource for the zebrafish community for the design and execution of CRISPR/Cas9 experiments.,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 10 31|ENA LAST UPDATE:2021 05 25,,RNA seq data of 5dpf larvae uninjected controls from the an additional batch.,Uninjected4,SAMEA8805901,UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA - DAVIS,ENA first public:2021 05 26|ENA last update:2021 05 26|External Id:SAMEA8805901|INSDC center alias:UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   DAVIS|INSDC center name:UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   DAVIS|INSDC first public:2021 05 26T09:21:17Z|INSDC last update:2021 05 26T09:21:17Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:Uninjected4|common name:zebrafish|sample name:Uninjected4,,,,,,,,,Illumina HiSeq 4000 paired end sequencing,ena EXPERIMENT UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   DAVIS 25 05 2021 08:56:51:032 10,unspecified,1,,,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,Oligo-dT,PAIRED,ILLUMINA,Illumina HiSeq 4000,,ERP123184,Illumina HiSeq 4000 paired end sequencing,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2021 05 26|ENA LAST UPDATE:2021 05 26,WT4_R1_001.fastq.gz WT4_R2_001.fastq.gz,fastq fastq,9222083700.0,30740279.0,ena RUN UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   DAVIS 25 05 2021 08:56:51:032 10,0:150 1:150,A:2328864269;C:2117919914;G:2560286870;T:2214801519;N:211128,150,150,,,2328864269,2117919914,2560286870,2214801519,211128,ERX5601616,ERS6490235,ERA4417635,UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA - DAVIS|European Nucleotide Archive,UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA - DAVIS,2,0.95124,0.92695,0.05122,0.05036,0.69118,0.70634,0.47769,0.47806,150,150,B,B,biological fallback assumption,illumina,hiseq_era,unknown,poly_a,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,United States,2020-10-31,Larval,Larval,Undetermined,Undetermined
9955,ERR5961094,ERX5601615,ERS6490234,ERP123184,PRJEB39643,CRISPR tools for zebrafish,ena-STUDY-UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA - DAVIS-29-07-2020-18:23:16:380-2095,Other,Zebrafish have practical features that make them a useful model for higher throughput tests of gene function using CRISPR/Cas9 editing to create 'knockout' models. A large number of computational and empirical tools exist to design CRISPR assays but often produce varied predictions across methods. To systematically assess accuracy of tool predictions of on  and off target gene editing  we subjected zebrafish embryos to CRISPR/Cas9 with 50 different guide RNAs gRNAs targeting 14 genes. We compared our experimental in vivo editing efficiencies in mosaic G0 embryos with those predicted by seven commonly used gRNA design tools and found large discrepancies between methods. Assessing off target mutations predicted in silico and in vitro found that the majority of tested loci had low in vivo frequencies <1%. To characterize if commonly used 'mock' CRISPR controls larvae injected with Cas9 enzyme or mRNA with no gRNA exhibited spurious molecular features that might exacerbate studies of G0 mosaic CRISPR knockout fish  we generated an RNA seq dataset of various control larvae at 5 dpf From this  while we found no evidence of spontaneous somatic mutations of injected larvae  we did identify several hundreds of differentially expressed genes with high variability between injection types. Network analyses of shared differentially expressed genes in the 'mock' injected larvae implicated a number of key regulators of common metabolic pathways  and gene ontology analysis revealed connections with response to wounding and cytoskeleton organization  highlighting a potential lasting effect from the microinjection process that requires further investigation. Overall  our results provide a valuable resource for the zebrafish community for the design and execution of CRISPR/Cas9 experiments.,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 10 31|ENA LAST UPDATE:2021 05 25,,RNA seq data of 5dpf larvae uninjected controls from the an additional batch.,Uninjected3,SAMEA8805900,UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA - DAVIS,ENA first public:2021 05 26|ENA last update:2021 05 26|External Id:SAMEA8805900|INSDC center alias:UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   DAVIS|INSDC center name:UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   DAVIS|INSDC first public:2021 05 26T09:21:17Z|INSDC last update:2021 05 26T09:21:17Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:Uninjected3|common name:zebrafish|sample name:Uninjected3,,,,,,,,,Illumina HiSeq 4000 paired end sequencing,ena EXPERIMENT UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   DAVIS 25 05 2021 08:56:51:032 9,unspecified,1,,,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,Oligo-dT,PAIRED,ILLUMINA,Illumina HiSeq 4000,,ERP123184,Illumina HiSeq 4000 paired end sequencing,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2021 05 26|ENA LAST UPDATE:2021 05 26,WT3_R1_001.fastq.gz WT3_R2_001.fastq.gz,fastq fastq,9088444200.0,30294814.0,ena RUN UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   DAVIS 25 05 2021 08:56:51:032 9,0:150 1:150,A:2404715160;C:2098546919;G:2330441921;T:2254532578;N:207622,150,150,,,2404715160,2098546919,2330441921,2254532578,207622,ERX5601615,ERS6490234,ERA4417635,UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA - DAVIS|European Nucleotide Archive,UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA - DAVIS,2,0.95071,0.93855,0.06295,0.06183,0.68511,0.70065,0.47621,0.48573,150,150,B,B,biological fallback assumption,illumina,hiseq_era,unknown,poly_a,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,United States,2020-10-31,Larval,Larval,Undetermined,Undetermined
9956,ERR5961091,ERX5601612,ERS6490231,ERP123184,PRJEB39643,CRISPR tools for zebrafish,ena-STUDY-UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA - DAVIS-29-07-2020-18:23:16:380-2095,Other,Zebrafish have practical features that make them a useful model for higher throughput tests of gene function using CRISPR/Cas9 editing to create 'knockout' models. A large number of computational and empirical tools exist to design CRISPR assays but often produce varied predictions across methods. To systematically assess accuracy of tool predictions of on  and off target gene editing  we subjected zebrafish embryos to CRISPR/Cas9 with 50 different guide RNAs gRNAs targeting 14 genes. We compared our experimental in vivo editing efficiencies in mosaic G0 embryos with those predicted by seven commonly used gRNA design tools and found large discrepancies between methods. Assessing off target mutations predicted in silico and in vitro found that the majority of tested loci had low in vivo frequencies <1%. To characterize if commonly used 'mock' CRISPR controls larvae injected with Cas9 enzyme or mRNA with no gRNA exhibited spurious molecular features that might exacerbate studies of G0 mosaic CRISPR knockout fish  we generated an RNA seq dataset of various control larvae at 5 dpf From this  while we found no evidence of spontaneous somatic mutations of injected larvae  we did identify several hundreds of differentially expressed genes with high variability between injection types. Network analyses of shared differentially expressed genes in the 'mock' injected larvae implicated a number of key regulators of common metabolic pathways  and gene ontology analysis revealed connections with response to wounding and cytoskeleton organization  highlighting a potential lasting effect from the microinjection process that requires further investigation. Overall  our results provide a valuable resource for the zebrafish community for the design and execution of CRISPR/Cas9 experiments.,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 10 31|ENA LAST UPDATE:2021 05 25,,RNA seq data of 5dpf larvae injected with Cas9 enzyme at the one cell stage.,Cas9enzyme3,SAMEA8805897,UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA - DAVIS,ENA first public:2021 05 26|ENA last update:2021 05 26|External Id:SAMEA8805897|INSDC center alias:UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   DAVIS|INSDC center name:UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   DAVIS|INSDC first public:2021 05 26T09:21:17Z|INSDC last update:2021 05 26T09:21:17Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:Cas9enzyme3|common name:zebrafish|sample name:Cas9enzyme3,,,,,,,,,Illumina HiSeq 4000 paired end sequencing,ena EXPERIMENT UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   DAVIS 25 05 2021 08:56:51:031 6,unspecified,1,,,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,Oligo-dT,PAIRED,ILLUMINA,Illumina HiSeq 4000,,ERP123184,Illumina HiSeq 4000 paired end sequencing,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2021 05 26|ENA LAST UPDATE:2021 05 26,RNA3_R1_001.fastq RNA3_R2_001.fastq,fastq fastq,5814764400.0,19382548.0,ena RUN UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   DAVIS 25 05 2021 08:56:51:031 6,0:150 1:150,A:1550014255;C:1359566801;G:1419514658;T:1485169819;N:498867,150,150,,,1550014255,1359566801,1419514658,1485169819,498867,ERX5601612,ERS6490231,ERA4417635,UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA - DAVIS|European Nucleotide Archive,UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA - DAVIS,2,0.96166,0.96182,0.04962,0.04954,0.68172,0.68144,0.45683,0.46611,150,150,B,B,biological fallback assumption,illumina,hiseq_era,unknown,poly_a,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,United States,2020-10-31,Larval,Larval,Undetermined,Undetermined
9957,ERR5961090,ERX5601611,ERS6490230,ERP123184,PRJEB39643,CRISPR tools for zebrafish,ena-STUDY-UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA - DAVIS-29-07-2020-18:23:16:380-2095,Other,Zebrafish have practical features that make them a useful model for higher throughput tests of gene function using CRISPR/Cas9 editing to create 'knockout' models. A large number of computational and empirical tools exist to design CRISPR assays but often produce varied predictions across methods. To systematically assess accuracy of tool predictions of on  and off target gene editing  we subjected zebrafish embryos to CRISPR/Cas9 with 50 different guide RNAs gRNAs targeting 14 genes. We compared our experimental in vivo editing efficiencies in mosaic G0 embryos with those predicted by seven commonly used gRNA design tools and found large discrepancies between methods. Assessing off target mutations predicted in silico and in vitro found that the majority of tested loci had low in vivo frequencies <1%. To characterize if commonly used 'mock' CRISPR controls larvae injected with Cas9 enzyme or mRNA with no gRNA exhibited spurious molecular features that might exacerbate studies of G0 mosaic CRISPR knockout fish  we generated an RNA seq dataset of various control larvae at 5 dpf From this  while we found no evidence of spontaneous somatic mutations of injected larvae  we did identify several hundreds of differentially expressed genes with high variability between injection types. Network analyses of shared differentially expressed genes in the 'mock' injected larvae implicated a number of key regulators of common metabolic pathways  and gene ontology analysis revealed connections with response to wounding and cytoskeleton organization  highlighting a potential lasting effect from the microinjection process that requires further investigation. Overall  our results provide a valuable resource for the zebrafish community for the design and execution of CRISPR/Cas9 experiments.,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 10 31|ENA LAST UPDATE:2021 05 25,,RNA seq data of 5dpf larvae injected with Cas9 enzyme at the one cell stage.,Cas9enzyme2,SAMEA8805896,UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA - DAVIS,ENA first public:2021 05 26|ENA last update:2021 05 26|External Id:SAMEA8805896|INSDC center alias:UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   DAVIS|INSDC center name:UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   DAVIS|INSDC first public:2021 05 26T09:21:17Z|INSDC last update:2021 05 26T09:21:17Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:Cas9enzyme2|common name:zebrafish|sample name:Cas9enzyme2,,,,,,,,,Illumina HiSeq 4000 paired end sequencing,ena EXPERIMENT UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   DAVIS 25 05 2021 08:56:51:031 5,unspecified,1,,,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,Oligo-dT,PAIRED,ILLUMINA,Illumina HiSeq 4000,,ERP123184,Illumina HiSeq 4000 paired end sequencing,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2021 05 26|ENA LAST UPDATE:2021 05 26,RNA2_R1_001.fastq RNA2_R2_001.fastq,fastq fastq,5927606100.0,19758687.0,ena RUN UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   DAVIS 25 05 2021 08:56:51:031 5,0:150 1:150,A:1579767222;C:1387675810;G:1439122138;T:1520529396;N:511534,150,150,,,1579767222,1387675810,1439122138,1520529396,511534,ERX5601611,ERS6490230,ERA4417635,UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA - DAVIS|European Nucleotide Archive,UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA - DAVIS,2,0.96217,0.96214,0.05174,0.05176,0.67083,0.6716,0.46772,0.47128,150,150,B,B,biological fallback assumption,illumina,hiseq_era,unknown,poly_a,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,United States,2020-10-31,Larval,Larval,Undetermined,Undetermined
9958,ERR5961089,ERX5601610,ERS6490229,ERP123184,PRJEB39643,CRISPR tools for zebrafish,ena-STUDY-UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA - DAVIS-29-07-2020-18:23:16:380-2095,Other,Zebrafish have practical features that make them a useful model for higher throughput tests of gene function using CRISPR/Cas9 editing to create 'knockout' models. A large number of computational and empirical tools exist to design CRISPR assays but often produce varied predictions across methods. To systematically assess accuracy of tool predictions of on  and off target gene editing  we subjected zebrafish embryos to CRISPR/Cas9 with 50 different guide RNAs gRNAs targeting 14 genes. We compared our experimental in vivo editing efficiencies in mosaic G0 embryos with those predicted by seven commonly used gRNA design tools and found large discrepancies between methods. Assessing off target mutations predicted in silico and in vitro found that the majority of tested loci had low in vivo frequencies <1%. To characterize if commonly used 'mock' CRISPR controls larvae injected with Cas9 enzyme or mRNA with no gRNA exhibited spurious molecular features that might exacerbate studies of G0 mosaic CRISPR knockout fish  we generated an RNA seq dataset of various control larvae at 5 dpf From this  while we found no evidence of spontaneous somatic mutations of injected larvae  we did identify several hundreds of differentially expressed genes with high variability between injection types. Network analyses of shared differentially expressed genes in the 'mock' injected larvae implicated a number of key regulators of common metabolic pathways  and gene ontology analysis revealed connections with response to wounding and cytoskeleton organization  highlighting a potential lasting effect from the microinjection process that requires further investigation. Overall  our results provide a valuable resource for the zebrafish community for the design and execution of CRISPR/Cas9 experiments.,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 10 31|ENA LAST UPDATE:2021 05 25,,RNA seq data of 5dpf larvae injected with Cas9 enzyme at the one cell stage.,Cas9enzyme1,SAMEA8805895,UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA - DAVIS,ENA first public:2021 05 26|ENA last update:2021 05 26|External Id:SAMEA8805895|INSDC center alias:UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   DAVIS|INSDC center name:UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   DAVIS|INSDC first public:2021 05 26T09:21:17Z|INSDC last update:2021 05 26T09:21:17Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:Cas9enzyme1|common name:zebrafish|sample name:Cas9enzyme1,,,,,,,,,Illumina HiSeq 4000 paired end sequencing,ena EXPERIMENT UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   DAVIS 25 05 2021 08:56:51:031 4,unspecified,1,,,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,Oligo-dT,PAIRED,ILLUMINA,Illumina HiSeq 4000,,ERP123184,Illumina HiSeq 4000 paired end sequencing,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2021 05 26|ENA LAST UPDATE:2021 05 26,RNA1_R1_001.fastq RNA1_R2_001.fastq,fastq fastq,5738133000.0,19127110.0,ena RUN UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   DAVIS 25 05 2021 08:56:51:031 4,0:150 1:150,A:1530616107;C:1342298453;G:1401357126;T:1463360623;N:500691,150,150,,,1530616107,1342298453,1401357126,1463360623,500691,ERX5601610,ERS6490229,ERA4417635,UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA - DAVIS|European Nucleotide Archive,UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA - DAVIS,2,0.95709,0.9569,0.05132,0.05149,0.68771,0.68846,0.45988,0.47329,150,150,B,B,biological fallback assumption,illumina,hiseq_era,unknown,poly_a,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,United States,2020-10-31,Larval,Larval,Undetermined,Undetermined
9959,ERR5961088,ERX5601609,ERS6490228,ERP123184,PRJEB39643,CRISPR tools for zebrafish,ena-STUDY-UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA - DAVIS-29-07-2020-18:23:16:380-2095,Other,Zebrafish have practical features that make them a useful model for higher throughput tests of gene function using CRISPR/Cas9 editing to create 'knockout' models. A large number of computational and empirical tools exist to design CRISPR assays but often produce varied predictions across methods. To systematically assess accuracy of tool predictions of on  and off target gene editing  we subjected zebrafish embryos to CRISPR/Cas9 with 50 different guide RNAs gRNAs targeting 14 genes. We compared our experimental in vivo editing efficiencies in mosaic G0 embryos with those predicted by seven commonly used gRNA design tools and found large discrepancies between methods. Assessing off target mutations predicted in silico and in vitro found that the majority of tested loci had low in vivo frequencies <1%. To characterize if commonly used 'mock' CRISPR controls larvae injected with Cas9 enzyme or mRNA with no gRNA exhibited spurious molecular features that might exacerbate studies of G0 mosaic CRISPR knockout fish  we generated an RNA seq dataset of various control larvae at 5 dpf From this  while we found no evidence of spontaneous somatic mutations of injected larvae  we did identify several hundreds of differentially expressed genes with high variability between injection types. Network analyses of shared differentially expressed genes in the 'mock' injected larvae implicated a number of key regulators of common metabolic pathways  and gene ontology analysis revealed connections with response to wounding and cytoskeleton organization  highlighting a potential lasting effect from the microinjection process that requires further investigation. Overall  our results provide a valuable resource for the zebrafish community for the design and execution of CRISPR/Cas9 experiments.,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 10 31|ENA LAST UPDATE:2021 05 25,,RNA seq data of 5dpf larvae injected with Cas9mRNA at the one cell stage.,Cas9mRNA3,SAMEA8805894,UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA - DAVIS,ENA first public:2021 05 26|ENA last update:2021 05 26|External Id:SAMEA8805894|INSDC center alias:UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   DAVIS|INSDC center name:UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   DAVIS|INSDC first public:2021 05 26T09:21:17Z|INSDC last update:2021 05 26T09:21:17Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:Cas9mRNA3|common name:zebrafish|sample name:Cas9mRNA3,,,,,,,,,Illumina HiSeq 4000 paired end sequencing,ena EXPERIMENT UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   DAVIS 25 05 2021 08:56:51:031 3,unspecified,1,,,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,Oligo-dT,PAIRED,ILLUMINA,Illumina HiSeq 4000,,ERP123184,Illumina HiSeq 4000 paired end sequencing,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2021 05 26|ENA LAST UPDATE:2021 05 26,PRO3_R1_001.fastq PRO3_R2_001.fastq,fastq fastq,9635841900.0,32119473.0,ena RUN UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   DAVIS 25 05 2021 08:56:51:031 3,0:150 1:150,A:2562857735;C:2253487693;G:2325345541;T:2493627020;N:523911,150,150,,,2562857735,2253487693,2325345541,2493627020,523911,ERX5601609,ERS6490228,ERA4417635,UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA - DAVIS|European Nucleotide Archive,UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA - DAVIS,2,0.95769,0.95696,0.05441,0.05397,0.67424,0.67407,0.46338,0.46444,150,150,B,B,biological fallback assumption,illumina,hiseq_era,unknown,poly_a,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,United States,2020-10-31,Larval,Larval,Undetermined,Undetermined
9960,ERR5961087,ERX5601608,ERS6490227,ERP123184,PRJEB39643,CRISPR tools for zebrafish,ena-STUDY-UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA - DAVIS-29-07-2020-18:23:16:380-2095,Other,Zebrafish have practical features that make them a useful model for higher throughput tests of gene function using CRISPR/Cas9 editing to create 'knockout' models. A large number of computational and empirical tools exist to design CRISPR assays but often produce varied predictions across methods. To systematically assess accuracy of tool predictions of on  and off target gene editing  we subjected zebrafish embryos to CRISPR/Cas9 with 50 different guide RNAs gRNAs targeting 14 genes. We compared our experimental in vivo editing efficiencies in mosaic G0 embryos with those predicted by seven commonly used gRNA design tools and found large discrepancies between methods. Assessing off target mutations predicted in silico and in vitro found that the majority of tested loci had low in vivo frequencies <1%. To characterize if commonly used 'mock' CRISPR controls larvae injected with Cas9 enzyme or mRNA with no gRNA exhibited spurious molecular features that might exacerbate studies of G0 mosaic CRISPR knockout fish  we generated an RNA seq dataset of various control larvae at 5 dpf From this  while we found no evidence of spontaneous somatic mutations of injected larvae  we did identify several hundreds of differentially expressed genes with high variability between injection types. Network analyses of shared differentially expressed genes in the 'mock' injected larvae implicated a number of key regulators of common metabolic pathways  and gene ontology analysis revealed connections with response to wounding and cytoskeleton organization  highlighting a potential lasting effect from the microinjection process that requires further investigation. Overall  our results provide a valuable resource for the zebrafish community for the design and execution of CRISPR/Cas9 experiments.,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 10 31|ENA LAST UPDATE:2021 05 25,,RNA seq data of 5dpf larvae injected with Cas9mRNA at the one cell stage.,Cas9mRNA2,SAMEA8805893,UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA - DAVIS,ENA first public:2021 05 26|ENA last update:2021 05 26|External Id:SAMEA8805893|INSDC center alias:UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   DAVIS|INSDC center name:UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   DAVIS|INSDC first public:2021 05 26T09:21:17Z|INSDC last update:2021 05 26T09:21:17Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:Cas9mRNA2|common name:zebrafish|sample name:Cas9mRNA2,,,,,,,,,Illumina HiSeq 4000 paired end sequencing,ena EXPERIMENT UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   DAVIS 25 05 2021 08:56:51:031 2,unspecified,1,,,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,Oligo-dT,PAIRED,ILLUMINA,Illumina HiSeq 4000,,ERP123184,Illumina HiSeq 4000 paired end sequencing,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2021 05 26|ENA LAST UPDATE:2021 10 21,PRO2_R1_001.fastq PRO2_R2_001.fastq,fastq fastq,8990649900.0,29968833.0,ena RUN UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   DAVIS 25 05 2021 08:56:51:031 2,0:150 1:150,A:2370044440;C:2140400380;G:2185347925;T:2294361536;N:495619,150,150,,,2370044440,2140400380,2185347925,2294361536,495619,ERX5601608,ERS6490227,ERA4417635,UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA - DAVIS|European Nucleotide Archive,UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA - DAVIS,2,0.95444,0.95397,0.05839,0.05842,0.67377,0.67207,0.48505,0.48043,150,150,B,B,biological fallback assumption,illumina,hiseq_era,unknown,poly_a,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,United States,2020-10-31,Larval,Larval,Undetermined,Undetermined
9961,ERR5961086,ERX5601607,ERS6490226,ERP123184,PRJEB39643,CRISPR tools for zebrafish,ena-STUDY-UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA - DAVIS-29-07-2020-18:23:16:380-2095,Other,Zebrafish have practical features that make them a useful model for higher throughput tests of gene function using CRISPR/Cas9 editing to create 'knockout' models. A large number of computational and empirical tools exist to design CRISPR assays but often produce varied predictions across methods. To systematically assess accuracy of tool predictions of on  and off target gene editing  we subjected zebrafish embryos to CRISPR/Cas9 with 50 different guide RNAs gRNAs targeting 14 genes. We compared our experimental in vivo editing efficiencies in mosaic G0 embryos with those predicted by seven commonly used gRNA design tools and found large discrepancies between methods. Assessing off target mutations predicted in silico and in vitro found that the majority of tested loci had low in vivo frequencies <1%. To characterize if commonly used 'mock' CRISPR controls larvae injected with Cas9 enzyme or mRNA with no gRNA exhibited spurious molecular features that might exacerbate studies of G0 mosaic CRISPR knockout fish  we generated an RNA seq dataset of various control larvae at 5 dpf From this  while we found no evidence of spontaneous somatic mutations of injected larvae  we did identify several hundreds of differentially expressed genes with high variability between injection types. Network analyses of shared differentially expressed genes in the 'mock' injected larvae implicated a number of key regulators of common metabolic pathways  and gene ontology analysis revealed connections with response to wounding and cytoskeleton organization  highlighting a potential lasting effect from the microinjection process that requires further investigation. Overall  our results provide a valuable resource for the zebrafish community for the design and execution of CRISPR/Cas9 experiments.,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 10 31|ENA LAST UPDATE:2021 05 25,,RNA seq data of 5dpf larvae injected with Cas9mRNA at the one cell stage.,Cas9mRNA1,SAMEA8805892,UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA - DAVIS,ENA first public:2021 05 26|ENA last update:2021 05 26|External Id:SAMEA8805892|INSDC center alias:UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   DAVIS|INSDC center name:UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   DAVIS|INSDC first public:2021 05 26T09:21:17Z|INSDC last update:2021 05 26T09:21:17Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:Cas9mRNA1|common name:zebrafish|sample name:Cas9mRNA1,,,,,,,,,Illumina HiSeq 4000 paired end sequencing,ena EXPERIMENT UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   DAVIS 25 05 2021 08:56:51:031 1,unspecified,1,,,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,Oligo-dT,PAIRED,ILLUMINA,Illumina HiSeq 4000,,ERP123184,Illumina HiSeq 4000 paired end sequencing,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2021 05 26|ENA LAST UPDATE:2021 05 26,PRO1_R1_001.fastq PRO1_R2_001.fastq,fastq fastq,8803789500.0,29345965.0,ena RUN UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   DAVIS 25 05 2021 08:56:51:031 1,0:150 1:150,A:2318913314;C:2090675347;G:2149054140;T:2244296747;N:849952,150,150,,,2318913314,2090675347,2149054140,2244296747,849952,ERX5601607,ERS6490226,ERA4417635,UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA - DAVIS|European Nucleotide Archive,UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA - DAVIS,2,0.954,0.9549,0.04652,0.04639,0.70806,0.71386,0.45393,0.44921,150,150,B,B,biological fallback assumption,illumina,hiseq_era,unknown,poly_a,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,United States,2020-10-31,Larval,Larval,Undetermined,Undetermined
9962,ERR4902960,ERX4769932,ERS5427208,ERP123184,PRJEB39643,CRISPR tools for zebrafish,ena-STUDY-UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA - DAVIS-29-07-2020-18:23:16:380-2095,Other,Zebrafish have practical features that make them a useful model for higher throughput tests of gene function using CRISPR/Cas9 editing to create 'knockout' models. A large number of computational and empirical tools exist to design CRISPR assays but often produce varied predictions across methods. To systematically assess accuracy of tool predictions of on  and off target gene editing  we subjected zebrafish embryos to CRISPR/Cas9 with 50 different guide RNAs gRNAs targeting 14 genes. We compared our experimental in vivo editing efficiencies in mosaic G0 embryos with those predicted by seven commonly used gRNA design tools and found large discrepancies between methods. Assessing off target mutations predicted in silico and in vitro found that the majority of tested loci had low in vivo frequencies <1%. To characterize if commonly used 'mock' CRISPR controls larvae injected with Cas9 enzyme or mRNA with no gRNA exhibited spurious molecular features that might exacerbate studies of G0 mosaic CRISPR knockout fish  we generated an RNA seq dataset of various control larvae at 5 dpf From this  while we found no evidence of spontaneous somatic mutations of injected larvae  we did identify several hundreds of differentially expressed genes with high variability between injection types. Network analyses of shared differentially expressed genes in the 'mock' injected larvae implicated a number of key regulators of common metabolic pathways  and gene ontology analysis revealed connections with response to wounding and cytoskeleton organization  highlighting a potential lasting effect from the microinjection process that requires further investigation. Overall  our results provide a valuable resource for the zebrafish community for the design and execution of CRISPR/Cas9 experiments.,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 10 31|ENA LAST UPDATE:2021 05 25,,RNAseq data from 5dpf NHGRI 1 zebrafish larvae uninjected.,CRISPR RNAseq,SAMEA7670216,UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA - DAVIS,ENA first public:2020 12 02|ENA last update:2020 12 02|External Id:SAMEA7670216|INSDC center alias:UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   DAVIS|INSDC center name:UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   DAVIS|INSDC first public:2020 12 02T08:08:09Z|INSDC last update:2020 12 02T07:46:12Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:CRISPR RNAseq8|common name:zebrafish|sample name:CRISPR RNAseq8,,,,,,,,,Illumina MiSeq paired end sequencing,ena EXPERIMENT UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   DAVIS 02 12 2020 07:26:18:139 8,unspecified,1,,,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,Oligo-dT,PAIRED,ILLUMINA,Illumina MiSeq,,ERP123184,Illumina MiSeq paired end sequencing,ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 12 02|ENA LAST UPDATE:2020 12 09,WT2_R1_001.fastq.gz WT2_R2_001.fastq.gz,fastq fastq,7020700500.0,23402335.0,ena RUN UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   DAVIS 02 12 2020 07:26:18:139 8,0:150 1:150,A:1879937256;C:1626166066;G:1693802223;T:1820178560;N:616395,150,150,,,1879937256,1626166066,1693802223,1820178560,616395,ERX4769932,ERS5427208,ERA3183786,UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA - DAVIS|European Nucleotide Archive,UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA - DAVIS,2,0.92352,0.92388,0.04778,0.04768,0.6924,0.69205,0.45557,0.45865,150,150,B,B,biological fallback assumption,illumina,miseq,unknown,poly_a,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,United States,2020-10-31,Larval,Larval,Undetermined,Undetermined