rowid,run.accession,experiment.accession,sample.accession,study.accession,bioproject,study.title,study.alias,study.type,study.abstract,study.attributes,study.PMIDs,sample.description,sample.title,sample.alias,sample.centername,sample.attributes,GEOsample.title,GEOsample.dataprocessing,GEOsample.source,GEOsample.treatmentprotocol,GEOsample.extractprotocol,GEOsample.growthprotocol,GEOsample.characteristics,GEOsample.accession,experiment.title,experiment.alias,experiment.library_name,experiment.design_description,experiment.library_construction_protocol,experiment.attributes,experiment.library_strategy,experiment.library_source,experiment.library_selection,experiment.library_layout,experiment.platform,experiment.instrument_model,experiment.spot_descriptor,experiment.study_ref,run.title,run.attributes,run.filename,run.semantic_name,run.total_bases,run.total_spots,run.alias,run.read_lengths,run.base_counts,run.r1_length,run.r2_length,run.r3_length,run.r4_length,run.Acount,run.Ccount,run.Gcount,run.Tcount,run.Ncount,run.experiment,run.pool_member,submission.accession,submission.srasource,submission.bioprojectsource,seqdetective.n_mates,seqdetective.mapping_rate.mate1,seqdetective.mapping_rate.mate2,seqdetective.nofeature_rate.mate1,seqdetective.nofeature_rate.mate2,seqdetective.sparsity.mate1,seqdetective.sparsity.mate2,seqdetective.pos_strand_rate.mate1,seqdetective.pos_strand_rate.mate2,seqdetective.readlen.mate1,seqdetective.readlen.mate2,seqdetective.judgement.mate1,seqdetective.judgement.mate2,seqdetective.judgement.reason,platform_family,instrument_generation,read_bias,selection_class,prep_kit,sc_or_bulk,tech_class,technology,tech_variant,submission.bioprojectsource.country,earliest_date,devstage_curation,devstage_curation_coarse,tissue_curation,tissue_curation_coarse 95,DRR050167,DRX045209,DRS025834,DRP003043,PRJDB4416,Transcriptome analysis in ES1 expressing rods of zebrafish,DRP003043,Transcriptome Analysis,Transcriptome analysis using next generation sequencing system for isolated rods from zebrafish of wild type T?bingen long fin TL line. Transgenic zebrafish expressing ES1 and/or EGFP in rods were used.,,,Zebrafish rods expressing ES1 and EGFP,ES1 3,SAMD00044057,,sample name:ES1 EGFP rod 003|strain:Tubingen long fin|cell type:rod,,,,,,,,,Ion Torrent PGM sequencing of SAMD00044057,DRX045209,1,1,1,,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,cDNA,SINGLE,ION_TORRENT,Ion Torrent PGM,1050Application ReadForward1,DRP003043,Ion Torrent PGM sequencing of SAMD00044057,,,,371748120.0,3469843.0,DRR050167,0:107.14,A:107190409;C:79475572;G:83520360;T:101561779;N:0,107,,,,107190409,79475572,83520360,101561779,0,DRX045209,DRS025834,DRA004229,"OSAKA_FB|Kawamura lab., Frontier Biology, Osaka univ.",Osaka university,1,0.81026,,0.26715,,0.86953,,0.52321,,51,,B,,usable mapping rate,ion_torrent,ion_torrent,unknown,cdna_unspecified,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Japan,2016-03-09,Undetermined,Undetermined,Fin,Surface Structure 96,DRR050166,DRX045208,DRS025833,DRP003043,PRJDB4416,Transcriptome analysis in ES1 expressing rods of zebrafish,DRP003043,Transcriptome Analysis,Transcriptome analysis using next generation sequencing system for isolated rods from zebrafish of wild type T?bingen long fin TL line. Transgenic zebrafish expressing ES1 and/or EGFP in rods were used.,,,Zebrafish rods expressing ES1 and EGFP,ES1 2,SAMD00044056,,sample name:ES1 EGFP rod 002|strain:Tubingen long fin|cell type:rod,,,,,,,,,Ion Torrent PGM sequencing of SAMD00044056,DRX045208,1,1,1,,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,cDNA,SINGLE,ION_TORRENT,Ion Torrent PGM,1280Application ReadForward1,DRP003043,Ion Torrent PGM sequencing of SAMD00044056,,,,425549011.0,3275261.0,DRR050166,0:129.93,A:126640704;C:86415371;G:90822163;T:121670773;N:0,129,,,,126640704,86415371,90822163,121670773,0,DRX045208,DRS025833,DRA004229,"OSAKA_FB|Kawamura lab., Frontier Biology, Osaka univ.",Osaka university,1,0.80223,,0.31429,,0.85861,,0.5272,,57,,B,,usable mapping rate,ion_torrent,ion_torrent,unknown,cdna_unspecified,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Japan,2016-03-09,Undetermined,Undetermined,Fin,Surface Structure 97,DRR050165,DRX045207,DRS025832,DRP003043,PRJDB4416,Transcriptome analysis in ES1 expressing rods of zebrafish,DRP003043,Transcriptome Analysis,Transcriptome analysis using next generation sequencing system for isolated rods from zebrafish of wild type T?bingen long fin TL line. Transgenic zebrafish expressing ES1 and/or EGFP in rods were used.,,,Zebrafish rods expressing ES1 and EGFP,ES1 1,SAMD00044055,,sample name:ES1 EGFP rod 001|strain:Tubingen long fin|cell type:rod,,,,,,,,,Ion Torrent PGM sequencing of SAMD00044055,DRX045207,1,1,1,,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,cDNA,SINGLE,ION_TORRENT,Ion Torrent PGM,1470Application ReadForward1,DRP003043,Ion Torrent PGM sequencing of SAMD00044055,,,,584599765.0,3941083.0,DRR050165,0:148.33,A:164329030;C:129885620;G:136727379;T:153657736;N:0,148,,,,164329030,129885620,136727379,153657736,0,DRX045207,DRS025832,DRA004229,"OSAKA_FB|Kawamura lab., Frontier Biology, Osaka univ.",Osaka university,1,0.83769,,0.25395,,0.83116,,0.52784,,185,,B,,usable mapping rate,ion_torrent,ion_torrent,unknown,cdna_unspecified,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Japan,2016-03-09,Undetermined,Undetermined,Fin,Surface Structure 98,DRR050164,DRX045206,DRS025831,DRP003043,PRJDB4416,Transcriptome analysis in ES1 expressing rods of zebrafish,DRP003043,Transcriptome Analysis,Transcriptome analysis using next generation sequencing system for isolated rods from zebrafish of wild type T?bingen long fin TL line. Transgenic zebrafish expressing ES1 and/or EGFP in rods were used.,,,Zebrafish rods expressing EGFP,EGFP 3,SAMD00044054,,sample name:EGFP rod 003|strain:Tubingen long fin|cell type:rod,,,,,,,,,Ion Torrent PGM sequencing of SAMD00044054,DRX045206,1,1,1,,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,cDNA,SINGLE,ION_TORRENT,Ion Torrent PGM,880Application ReadForward1,DRP003043,Ion Torrent PGM sequencing of SAMD00044054,,,,343014114.0,3827762.0,DRR050164,0:89.61,A:99421434;C:73070267;G:77738821;T:92783592;N:0,89,,,,99421434,73070267,77738821,92783592,0,DRX045206,DRS025831,DRA004229,"OSAKA_FB|Kawamura lab., Frontier Biology, Osaka univ.",Osaka university,1,0.78953,,0.25529,,0.87367,,0.52148,,24,,B,,usable mapping rate,ion_torrent,ion_torrent,unknown,cdna_unspecified,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Japan,2016-03-09,Undetermined,Undetermined,Fin,Surface Structure 99,DRR050163,DRX045205,DRS025830,DRP003043,PRJDB4416,Transcriptome analysis in ES1 expressing rods of zebrafish,DRP003043,Transcriptome Analysis,Transcriptome analysis using next generation sequencing system for isolated rods from zebrafish of wild type T?bingen long fin TL line. Transgenic zebrafish expressing ES1 and/or EGFP in rods were used.,,,Zebrafish rods expressing EGFP,EGFP 2,SAMD00044053,,sample name:EGFP rod 002|strain:Tubingen long fin|cell type:rod,,,,,,,,,Ion Torrent PGM sequencing of SAMD00044053,DRX045205,1,1,1,,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,cDNA,SINGLE,ION_TORRENT,Ion Torrent PGM,1370Application ReadForward1,DRP003043,Ion Torrent PGM sequencing of SAMD00044053,,,,533069427.0,3824140.0,DRR050163,0:139.40,A:152608173;C:113928273;G:120051739;T:146481242;N:0,139,,,,152608173,113928273,120051739,146481242,0,DRX045205,DRS025830,DRA004229,"OSAKA_FB|Kawamura lab., Frontier Biology, Osaka univ.",Osaka university,1,0.80412,,0.26768,,0.85338,,0.52255,,245,,B,,usable mapping rate,ion_torrent,ion_torrent,unknown,cdna_unspecified,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Japan,2016-03-09,Undetermined,Undetermined,Fin,Surface Structure 100,DRR050162,DRX045204,DRS025829,DRP003043,PRJDB4416,Transcriptome analysis in ES1 expressing rods of zebrafish,DRP003043,Transcriptome Analysis,Transcriptome analysis using next generation sequencing system for isolated rods from zebrafish of wild type T?bingen long fin TL line. Transgenic zebrafish expressing ES1 and/or EGFP in rods were used.,,,Zebrafish rods expressing EGFP,EGFP 1,SAMD00044052,,sample name:EGFP rod 001|strain:Tubingen long fin|cell type:rod,,,,,,,,,Ion Torrent PGM sequencing of SAMD00044052,DRX045204,1,1,1,,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,cDNA,SINGLE,ION_TORRENT,Ion Torrent PGM,1130Application ReadForward1,DRP003043,Ion Torrent PGM sequencing of SAMD00044052,,,,478262965.0,4224064.0,DRR050162,0:113.22,A:136348264;C:104872341;G:113114502;T:123927858;N:0,113,,,,136348264,104872341,113114502,123927858,0,DRX045204,DRS025829,DRA004229,"OSAKA_FB|Kawamura lab., Frontier Biology, Osaka univ.",Osaka university,1,0.86947,,0.29839,,0.83317,,0.51453,,80,,B,,usable mapping rate,ion_torrent,ion_torrent,unknown,cdna_unspecified,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Japan,2016-03-09,Undetermined,Undetermined,Fin,Surface Structure 282,DRR179616,DRX170142,DRS185505,DRP007318,PRJDB8340,Gene expression analysis of zebrafish fin melanophores and xanthophores.,DRP007318,Other,Pigment cells melanophores and xanthophores were collected from zebrafish fin. Total RNAs were extracted from each melanophore and xanthophore and cDNA libraries were prepared using SMARTer Ultra Low Input RNA Kit for Sequencing v3 and Ion Xpress Plus gDNA Fragment Library Preparation. The libraries were sequenced using the Ion PGM with Ion PGM OT2 400 kit and Ion PGM Sequencing 400 kit.,,,Biological replicate 2,Fin xanthophore 03,SAMD00172019,,sample name:Zebrafish pigment cell 06|cell type:Xanthophore|collection date:2015 11 12|dev stage:Adult|genotype:Wild type|tissue:Caudal fin and anal fin,,,,,,,,,Ion Torrent PGM sequencing of SAMD00172019,DRX170142,Zebrafish fin xanthophore 01,1,1,,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,RT-PCR,SINGLE,ION_TORRENT,Ion Torrent PGM,2320Application ReadForward1,DRP007318,Ion Torrent PGM sequencing of SAMD00172019,,,,376558775.0,1624500.0,DRR179616,0:231.80,A:107837072;C:79508449;G:79372899;T:109840355;N:0,231,,,,107837072,79508449,79372899,109840355,0,DRX170142,DRS185505,DRA008445,"OSAKA_FB|Laboratory Pattern Formation, Graduate School of Frontier Biosciences, Osaka University","Laboratory Pattern Formation, Graduate School of Frontier Biosciences, Osaka University",1,0.86944,,0.10951,,0.90425,,0.59385,,311,,B,,usable mapping rate,ion_torrent,ion_torrent,full_length,other,smarter,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Japan,2021-05-21,Adult,Adult,Fin,Surface Structure 283,DRR179615,DRX170141,DRS185504,DRP007318,PRJDB8340,Gene expression analysis of zebrafish fin melanophores and xanthophores.,DRP007318,Other,Pigment cells melanophores and xanthophores were collected from zebrafish fin. Total RNAs were extracted from each melanophore and xanthophore and cDNA libraries were prepared using SMARTer Ultra Low Input RNA Kit for Sequencing v3 and Ion Xpress Plus gDNA Fragment Library Preparation. The libraries were sequenced using the Ion PGM with Ion PGM OT2 400 kit and Ion PGM Sequencing 400 kit.,,,Biological replicate 1,Fin xanthophore 02,SAMD00172018,,sample name:Zebrafish pigment cell 05|cell type:Xanthophore|collection date:2015 09 10|dev stage:Adult|genotype:Wild type|tissue:Caudal fin and anal fin,,,,,,,,,Ion Torrent PGM sequencing of SAMD00172018,DRX170141,Zebrafish fin xanthophore 01,1,1,,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,RT-PCR,SINGLE,ION_TORRENT,Ion Torrent PGM,2430Application ReadForward1,DRP007318,Ion Torrent PGM sequencing of SAMD00172018,,,,515115515.0,2124170.0,DRR179615,0:242.50,A:138421982;C:119032803;G:119412227;T:138248503;N:0,242,,,,138421982,119032803,119412227,138248503,0,DRX170141,DRS185504,DRA008445,"OSAKA_FB|Laboratory Pattern Formation, Graduate School of Frontier Biosciences, Osaka University","Laboratory Pattern Formation, Graduate School of Frontier Biosciences, Osaka University",1,0.88998,,0.05858,,0.88051,,0.50917,,284,,B,,usable mapping rate,ion_torrent,ion_torrent,full_length,other,smarter,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Japan,2021-05-21,Adult,Adult,Fin,Surface Structure 284,DRR179614,DRX170140,DRS185503,DRP007318,PRJDB8340,Gene expression analysis of zebrafish fin melanophores and xanthophores.,DRP007318,Other,Pigment cells melanophores and xanthophores were collected from zebrafish fin. Total RNAs were extracted from each melanophore and xanthophore and cDNA libraries were prepared using SMARTer Ultra Low Input RNA Kit for Sequencing v3 and Ion Xpress Plus gDNA Fragment Library Preparation. The libraries were sequenced using the Ion PGM with Ion PGM OT2 400 kit and Ion PGM Sequencing 400 kit.,,,Biological replicate 1,Fin xanthophore 01,SAMD00172017,,sample name:Zebrafish pigment cell 04|cell type:Xanthophore|collection date:2015 09 10|dev stage:Adult|genotype:Wild type|tissue:Caudal fin and anal fin,,,,,,,,,Ion Torrent PGM sequencing of SAMD00172017,DRX170140,Zebrafish fin xanthophore 01,1,1,,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,RT-PCR,SINGLE,ION_TORRENT,Ion Torrent PGM,2470Application ReadForward1,DRP007318,Ion Torrent PGM sequencing of SAMD00172017,,,,371242152.0,1504407.0,DRR179614,0:246.77,A:99341086;C:86126839;G:86264882;T:99509345;N:0,246,,,,99341086,86126839,86264882,99509345,0,DRX170140,DRS185503,DRA008445,"OSAKA_FB|Laboratory Pattern Formation, Graduate School of Frontier Biosciences, Osaka University","Laboratory Pattern Formation, Graduate School of Frontier Biosciences, Osaka University",1,0.88672,,0.06422,,0.85679,,0.5066,,56,,B,,usable mapping rate,ion_torrent,ion_torrent,full_length,other,smarter,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Japan,2021-05-21,Adult,Adult,Fin,Surface Structure 285,DRR179613,DRX170139,DRS185502,DRP007318,PRJDB8340,Gene expression analysis of zebrafish fin melanophores and xanthophores.,DRP007318,Other,Pigment cells melanophores and xanthophores were collected from zebrafish fin. Total RNAs were extracted from each melanophore and xanthophore and cDNA libraries were prepared using SMARTer Ultra Low Input RNA Kit for Sequencing v3 and Ion Xpress Plus gDNA Fragment Library Preparation. The libraries were sequenced using the Ion PGM with Ion PGM OT2 400 kit and Ion PGM Sequencing 400 kit.,,,Biological replicate 2,Fin melanophore 03,SAMD00172016,,sample name:Zebrafish pigment cell 03|cell type:Melanophore|collection date:2015 11 12|dev stage:Adult|genotype:Wild type|tissue:Caudal fin and anal fin,,,,,,,,,Ion Torrent PGM sequencing of SAMD00172016,DRX170139,Zebrafish fin melanophore 03,1,1,,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,RT-PCR,SINGLE,ION_TORRENT,Ion Torrent PGM,2480Application ReadForward1,DRP007318,Ion Torrent PGM sequencing of SAMD00172016,,,,342802993.0,1585538.0,DRR179613,0:216.21,A:90833658;C:80789744;G:80463233;T:90716358;N:0,216,,,,90833658,80789744,80463233,90716358,0,DRX170139,DRS185502,DRA008445,"OSAKA_FB|Laboratory Pattern Formation, Graduate School of Frontier Biosciences, Osaka University","Laboratory Pattern Formation, Graduate School of Frontier Biosciences, Osaka University",1,0.8312,,0.03528,,0.88605,,0.47299,,285,,B,,usable mapping rate,ion_torrent,ion_torrent,full_length,other,smarter,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Japan,2021-05-21,Adult,Adult,Fin,Surface Structure 286,DRR179612,DRX170138,DRS185501,DRP007318,PRJDB8340,Gene expression analysis of zebrafish fin melanophores and xanthophores.,DRP007318,Other,Pigment cells melanophores and xanthophores were collected from zebrafish fin. Total RNAs were extracted from each melanophore and xanthophore and cDNA libraries were prepared using SMARTer Ultra Low Input RNA Kit for Sequencing v3 and Ion Xpress Plus gDNA Fragment Library Preparation. The libraries were sequenced using the Ion PGM with Ion PGM OT2 400 kit and Ion PGM Sequencing 400 kit.,,,Biological replicate 1,Fin melanophore 02,SAMD00172015,,sample name:Zebrafish pigment cell 02|cell type:Melanophore|collection date:2015 05 12|dev stage:Adult|genotype:Wild type|tissue:Caudal fin and anal fin,,,,,,,,,Ion Torrent PGM sequencing of SAMD00172015,DRX170138,Zebrafish fin melanophore 02,1,1,,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,RT-PCR,SINGLE,ION_TORRENT,Ion Torrent PGM,2160Application ReadForward1,DRP007318,Ion Torrent PGM sequencing of SAMD00172015,,,,538412675.0,2168231.0,DRR179612,0:248.32,A:147128403;C:121854818;G:121564109;T:147865345;N:0,248,,,,147128403,121854818,121564109,147865345,0,DRX170138,DRS185501,DRA008445,"OSAKA_FB|Laboratory Pattern Formation, Graduate School of Frontier Biosciences, Osaka University","Laboratory Pattern Formation, Graduate School of Frontier Biosciences, Osaka University",1,0.89106,,0.07081,,0.89286,,0.5935,,283,,B,,usable mapping rate,ion_torrent,ion_torrent,full_length,other,smarter,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Japan,2021-05-21,Adult,Adult,Fin,Surface Structure 287,DRR179611,DRX170137,DRS185500,DRP007318,PRJDB8340,Gene expression analysis of zebrafish fin melanophores and xanthophores.,DRP007318,Other,Pigment cells melanophores and xanthophores were collected from zebrafish fin. Total RNAs were extracted from each melanophore and xanthophore and cDNA libraries were prepared using SMARTer Ultra Low Input RNA Kit for Sequencing v3 and Ion Xpress Plus gDNA Fragment Library Preparation. The libraries were sequenced using the Ion PGM with Ion PGM OT2 400 kit and Ion PGM Sequencing 400 kit.,,,Biological replicate 1,Fin melanophore 01,SAMD00172014,,sample name:Zebrafish pigment cell 01|cell type:Melanophore|collection date:2015 05 12|dev stage:Adult|genotype:Wild type|tissue:Caudal fin and anal fin,,,,,,,,,Ion Torrent PGM sequencing of SAMD00172014,DRX170137,Zebrafish fin melanophore 01,1,1,,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,RT-PCR,SINGLE,ION_TORRENT,Ion Torrent PGM,2150Application ReadForward1,DRP007318,Ion Torrent PGM sequencing of SAMD00172014,,,,282446840.0,1311431.0,DRR179611,0:215.37,A:74927237;C:66575483;G:66161471;T:74782649;N:0,215,,,,74927237,66575483,66161471,74782649,0,DRX170137,DRS185500,DRA008445,"OSAKA_FB|Laboratory Pattern Formation, Graduate School of Frontier Biosciences, Osaka University","Laboratory Pattern Formation, Graduate School of Frontier Biosciences, Osaka University",1,0.85938,,0.0335,,0.89248,,0.58813,,274,,B,,usable mapping rate,ion_torrent,ion_torrent,full_length,other,smarter,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Japan,2021-05-21,Adult,Adult,Fin,Surface Structure 35557,SRR32880273,SRX28160884,SRS24513822,SRP573530,PRJNA1242724,Early exercise disrupts a pro repair extracellular matrix program during zebrafish fin regeneration,GSE293062,Transcriptome Analysis,Understanding how mechanical stimulation affects cellular behaviors during tissue regeneration offers valuable insight into the mechanisms that regulate injury repair. We incorporated a swim tunnel exercise regimen during zebrafish caudal fin regeneration to explore exercise loading impacts on a robust model of tissue regeneration. Early exercise loading initiated before or during blastema formation resulted in reduced regenerative outcomes. Long term tracking of fluorescently labeled cell lineages showed exercise loading disrupted blastemal mesenchyme formation. Transcriptomic profiling and section staining indicated loading reduced an extracellular matrix ECM gene expression program including for hyaluronic acid HA synthesis. Like exercise loading HA synthesis inhibition or blastemal HA depletion disrupted blastema formation. We considered if injury upregulated HA establishes a pro regenerative environment facilitating mechanotransduction. HA density across the blastema correlated with nuclear localization of the mechanotransducer Yes associated protein Yap. Further exercise loading or HA depletion decreased nuclear Yap and Proliferative Cell Nuclear Antigen staining. We conclude early loading during fin regeneration disrupts expression of an HA rich ECM supporting blastema expansion. Our study of mechanical loading during fin regeneration reveals a stage dependent response similar to that seen in mammalian skeletal repair where early exercise—applied during blastema establishment—impairs regeneration while delayed loading during outgrowth does not suggesting a conserved sensitivity to the timing and intensity of mechanical stimuli in regenerative processes. Overall design: RNAseq profiling of 3 day post amputation fin regenerate blastema tissue following either swimming exercise exp or unexercised controls control,,,,3dpa blastema exercised exp bio rep 5,GSM8875053,,source name:whole caudal fin 3 dpa blastema|tissue:whole caudal fin 3 dpa blastema|genotype:WT|treatment:Swim exercised|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing,3dpa blastema exercised exp bio rep 5,Reads were aligned with Kallisto Pachter lab against zebrafish reference transcriptome. Assembly: GRCz11 Supplementary files format and content: .h5 counts abundance files,whole caudal fin 3 dpa blastema,Fish with caudal fin amputations were exercised twice at 48 and 72 hours post amputation and then whole regenerate fin tissue collected into Trizol reagent on ice 4 hours later.,RNA was prepared using a Direct Zol RNA prep kit Zymogenetics and eluted into water. RNA was pooled from 2 male and 2 female size matched fish for each replicate with replicates spanning two independent swimming cohorts. Libraries were prepared with 1 ug of input RNA using a TruSeq library prep kit indexed and pooled and sequenced using an Illumina NovaSeq 6000 to a read depth of approximately 25 million reads per library.,Zebrafish age 3 month 12 month were housed at approximately 28.5°C. Animals were maintained on a 14:10 day:night cycle and fed twice daily,tissue:whole caudal fin 3 dpa blastema|genotype:WT|treatment:Swim exercised,GSM8875053,GSM8875053: 3dpa blastema exercised exp bio rep 5; Danio rerio; RNA Seq,GSM8875053 r1,GSM8875053,1,RNA was prepared using a Direct Zol RNA prep kit Zymogenetics and eluted into water. RNA was pooled from 2 male and 2 female size matched fish for each replicate with replicates spanning two independent swimming cohorts. Libraries were prepared with 1 ug of input RNA using a TruSeq library prep kit indexed and pooled and sequenced using an Illumina NovaSeq 6000 to a read depth of approximately 25 million reads per library.,,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,cDNA,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,Illumina NovaSeq 6000,,SRP573530,,,Exp_5_raw.fastq.gz,fastq,3833406286.0,31421363.0,GSM8875053 r1,0:122,A:1051289152;C:808410920;G:908646262;T:1064964960;N:94992,122,,,,1051289152,808410920,908646262,1064964960,94992,SRX28160884,SRS24513822,SRA2100952,"Stankunas, Institute of Molecular Biology, University of Oregon","Stankunas, Institute of Molecular Biology, University of Oregon",,,,,,,,,,,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,novaseq_era,unknown,cdna_unspecified,trueseq,bulk,unknown,unknown,,United States,2025-03-27,Adult,Adult,Fin,Surface Structure 35558,SRR32880274,SRX28160883,SRS24513821,SRP573530,PRJNA1242724,Early exercise disrupts a pro repair extracellular matrix program during zebrafish fin regeneration,GSE293062,Transcriptome Analysis,Understanding how mechanical stimulation affects cellular behaviors during tissue regeneration offers valuable insight into the mechanisms that regulate injury repair. We incorporated a swim tunnel exercise regimen during zebrafish caudal fin regeneration to explore exercise loading impacts on a robust model of tissue regeneration. Early exercise loading initiated before or during blastema formation resulted in reduced regenerative outcomes. Long term tracking of fluorescently labeled cell lineages showed exercise loading disrupted blastemal mesenchyme formation. Transcriptomic profiling and section staining indicated loading reduced an extracellular matrix ECM gene expression program including for hyaluronic acid HA synthesis. Like exercise loading HA synthesis inhibition or blastemal HA depletion disrupted blastema formation. We considered if injury upregulated HA establishes a pro regenerative environment facilitating mechanotransduction. HA density across the blastema correlated with nuclear localization of the mechanotransducer Yes associated protein Yap. Further exercise loading or HA depletion decreased nuclear Yap and Proliferative Cell Nuclear Antigen staining. We conclude early loading during fin regeneration disrupts expression of an HA rich ECM supporting blastema expansion. Our study of mechanical loading during fin regeneration reveals a stage dependent response similar to that seen in mammalian skeletal repair where early exercise—applied during blastema establishment—impairs regeneration while delayed loading during outgrowth does not suggesting a conserved sensitivity to the timing and intensity of mechanical stimuli in regenerative processes. Overall design: RNAseq profiling of 3 day post amputation fin regenerate blastema tissue following either swimming exercise exp or unexercised controls control,,,,3dpa blastema exercised exp bio rep 4,GSM8875052,,source name:whole caudal fin 3 dpa blastema|tissue:whole caudal fin 3 dpa blastema|genotype:WT|treatment:Swim exercised|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing,3dpa blastema exercised exp bio rep 4,Reads were aligned with Kallisto Pachter lab against zebrafish reference transcriptome. Assembly: GRCz11 Supplementary files format and content: .h5 counts abundance files,whole caudal fin 3 dpa blastema,Fish with caudal fin amputations were exercised twice at 48 and 72 hours post amputation and then whole regenerate fin tissue collected into Trizol reagent on ice 4 hours later.,RNA was prepared using a Direct Zol RNA prep kit Zymogenetics and eluted into water. RNA was pooled from 2 male and 2 female size matched fish for each replicate with replicates spanning two independent swimming cohorts. Libraries were prepared with 1 ug of input RNA using a TruSeq library prep kit indexed and pooled and sequenced using an Illumina NovaSeq 6000 to a read depth of approximately 25 million reads per library.,Zebrafish age 3 month 12 month were housed at approximately 28.5°C. Animals were maintained on a 14:10 day:night cycle and fed twice daily,tissue:whole caudal fin 3 dpa blastema|genotype:WT|treatment:Swim exercised,GSM8875052,GSM8875052: 3dpa blastema exercised exp bio rep 4; Danio rerio; RNA Seq,GSM8875052 r1,GSM8875052,1,RNA was prepared using a Direct Zol RNA prep kit Zymogenetics and eluted into water. RNA was pooled from 2 male and 2 female size matched fish for each replicate with replicates spanning two independent swimming cohorts. Libraries were prepared with 1 ug of input RNA using a TruSeq library prep kit indexed and pooled and sequenced using an Illumina NovaSeq 6000 to a read depth of approximately 25 million reads per library.,,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,cDNA,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,Illumina NovaSeq 6000,,SRP573530,,,Exp_4_raw.fastq.gz,fastq,2716320484.0,22264922.0,GSM8875052 r1,0:122,A:753716648;C:572683669;G:633777091;T:756074187;N:68889,122,,,,753716648,572683669,633777091,756074187,68889,SRX28160883,SRS24513821,SRA2100952,"Stankunas, Institute of Molecular Biology, University of Oregon","Stankunas, Institute of Molecular Biology, University of Oregon",,,,,,,,,,,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,novaseq_era,unknown,cdna_unspecified,trueseq,bulk,unknown,unknown,,United States,2025-03-27,Adult,Adult,Fin,Surface Structure 35559,SRR32880275,SRX28160882,SRS24513820,SRP573530,PRJNA1242724,Early exercise disrupts a pro repair extracellular matrix program during zebrafish fin regeneration,GSE293062,Transcriptome Analysis,Understanding how mechanical stimulation affects cellular behaviors during tissue regeneration offers valuable insight into the mechanisms that regulate injury repair. We incorporated a swim tunnel exercise regimen during zebrafish caudal fin regeneration to explore exercise loading impacts on a robust model of tissue regeneration. Early exercise loading initiated before or during blastema formation resulted in reduced regenerative outcomes. Long term tracking of fluorescently labeled cell lineages showed exercise loading disrupted blastemal mesenchyme formation. Transcriptomic profiling and section staining indicated loading reduced an extracellular matrix ECM gene expression program including for hyaluronic acid HA synthesis. Like exercise loading HA synthesis inhibition or blastemal HA depletion disrupted blastema formation. We considered if injury upregulated HA establishes a pro regenerative environment facilitating mechanotransduction. HA density across the blastema correlated with nuclear localization of the mechanotransducer Yes associated protein Yap. Further exercise loading or HA depletion decreased nuclear Yap and Proliferative Cell Nuclear Antigen staining. We conclude early loading during fin regeneration disrupts expression of an HA rich ECM supporting blastema expansion. Our study of mechanical loading during fin regeneration reveals a stage dependent response similar to that seen in mammalian skeletal repair where early exercise—applied during blastema establishment—impairs regeneration while delayed loading during outgrowth does not suggesting a conserved sensitivity to the timing and intensity of mechanical stimuli in regenerative processes. Overall design: RNAseq profiling of 3 day post amputation fin regenerate blastema tissue following either swimming exercise exp or unexercised controls control,,,,3dpa blastema exercised exp bio rep 3,GSM8875051,,source name:whole caudal fin 3 dpa blastema|tissue:whole caudal fin 3 dpa blastema|genotype:WT|treatment:Swim exercised|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing,3dpa blastema exercised exp bio rep 3,Reads were aligned with Kallisto Pachter lab against zebrafish reference transcriptome. Assembly: GRCz11 Supplementary files format and content: .h5 counts abundance files,whole caudal fin 3 dpa blastema,Fish with caudal fin amputations were exercised twice at 48 and 72 hours post amputation and then whole regenerate fin tissue collected into Trizol reagent on ice 4 hours later.,RNA was prepared using a Direct Zol RNA prep kit Zymogenetics and eluted into water. RNA was pooled from 2 male and 2 female size matched fish for each replicate with replicates spanning two independent swimming cohorts. Libraries were prepared with 1 ug of input RNA using a TruSeq library prep kit indexed and pooled and sequenced using an Illumina NovaSeq 6000 to a read depth of approximately 25 million reads per library.,Zebrafish age 3 month 12 month were housed at approximately 28.5°C. Animals were maintained on a 14:10 day:night cycle and fed twice daily,tissue:whole caudal fin 3 dpa blastema|genotype:WT|treatment:Swim exercised,GSM8875051,GSM8875051: 3dpa blastema exercised exp bio rep 3; Danio rerio; RNA Seq,GSM8875051 r1,GSM8875051,1,RNA was prepared using a Direct Zol RNA prep kit Zymogenetics and eluted into water. RNA was pooled from 2 male and 2 female size matched fish for each replicate with replicates spanning two independent swimming cohorts. Libraries were prepared with 1 ug of input RNA using a TruSeq library prep kit indexed and pooled and sequenced using an Illumina NovaSeq 6000 to a read depth of approximately 25 million reads per library.,,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,cDNA,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,Illumina NovaSeq 6000,,SRP573530,,,Exp_3_raw.fastq.gz,fastq,3326494944.0,27266352.0,GSM8875051 r1,0:122,A:929692130;C:705713811;G:773972336;T:917030832;N:85835,122,,,,929692130,705713811,773972336,917030832,85835,SRX28160882,SRS24513820,SRA2100952,"Stankunas, Institute of Molecular Biology, University of Oregon","Stankunas, Institute of Molecular Biology, University of Oregon",,,,,,,,,,,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,novaseq_era,unknown,cdna_unspecified,trueseq,bulk,unknown,unknown,,United States,2025-03-27,Adult,Adult,Fin,Surface Structure 35560,SRR32880276,SRX28160881,SRS24513819,SRP573530,PRJNA1242724,Early exercise disrupts a pro repair extracellular matrix program during zebrafish fin regeneration,GSE293062,Transcriptome Analysis,Understanding how mechanical stimulation affects cellular behaviors during tissue regeneration offers valuable insight into the mechanisms that regulate injury repair. We incorporated a swim tunnel exercise regimen during zebrafish caudal fin regeneration to explore exercise loading impacts on a robust model of tissue regeneration. Early exercise loading initiated before or during blastema formation resulted in reduced regenerative outcomes. Long term tracking of fluorescently labeled cell lineages showed exercise loading disrupted blastemal mesenchyme formation. Transcriptomic profiling and section staining indicated loading reduced an extracellular matrix ECM gene expression program including for hyaluronic acid HA synthesis. Like exercise loading HA synthesis inhibition or blastemal HA depletion disrupted blastema formation. We considered if injury upregulated HA establishes a pro regenerative environment facilitating mechanotransduction. HA density across the blastema correlated with nuclear localization of the mechanotransducer Yes associated protein Yap. Further exercise loading or HA depletion decreased nuclear Yap and Proliferative Cell Nuclear Antigen staining. We conclude early loading during fin regeneration disrupts expression of an HA rich ECM supporting blastema expansion. Our study of mechanical loading during fin regeneration reveals a stage dependent response similar to that seen in mammalian skeletal repair where early exercise—applied during blastema establishment—impairs regeneration while delayed loading during outgrowth does not suggesting a conserved sensitivity to the timing and intensity of mechanical stimuli in regenerative processes. Overall design: RNAseq profiling of 3 day post amputation fin regenerate blastema tissue following either swimming exercise exp or unexercised controls control,,,,3dpa blastema exercised exp bio rep 2,GSM8875050,,source name:whole caudal fin 3 dpa blastema|tissue:whole caudal fin 3 dpa blastema|genotype:WT|treatment:Swim exercised|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing,3dpa blastema exercised exp bio rep 2,Reads were aligned with Kallisto Pachter lab against zebrafish reference transcriptome. Assembly: GRCz11 Supplementary files format and content: .h5 counts abundance files,whole caudal fin 3 dpa blastema,Fish with caudal fin amputations were exercised twice at 48 and 72 hours post amputation and then whole regenerate fin tissue collected into Trizol reagent on ice 4 hours later.,RNA was prepared using a Direct Zol RNA prep kit Zymogenetics and eluted into water. RNA was pooled from 2 male and 2 female size matched fish for each replicate with replicates spanning two independent swimming cohorts. Libraries were prepared with 1 ug of input RNA using a TruSeq library prep kit indexed and pooled and sequenced using an Illumina NovaSeq 6000 to a read depth of approximately 25 million reads per library.,Zebrafish age 3 month 12 month were housed at approximately 28.5°C. Animals were maintained on a 14:10 day:night cycle and fed twice daily,tissue:whole caudal fin 3 dpa blastema|genotype:WT|treatment:Swim exercised,GSM8875050,GSM8875050: 3dpa blastema exercised exp bio rep 2; Danio rerio; RNA Seq,GSM8875050 r1,GSM8875050,1,RNA was prepared using a Direct Zol RNA prep kit Zymogenetics and eluted into water. RNA was pooled from 2 male and 2 female size matched fish for each replicate with replicates spanning two independent swimming cohorts. Libraries were prepared with 1 ug of input RNA using a TruSeq library prep kit indexed and pooled and sequenced using an Illumina NovaSeq 6000 to a read depth of approximately 25 million reads per library.,,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,cDNA,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,Illumina NovaSeq 6000,,SRP573530,,,Exp_2_raw.fastq.gz,fastq,3319809954.0,27211557.0,GSM8875050 r1,0:122,A:912008882;C:704589377;G:783108238;T:920018852;N:84605,122,,,,912008882,704589377,783108238,920018852,84605,SRX28160881,SRS24513819,SRA2100952,"Stankunas, Institute of Molecular Biology, University of Oregon","Stankunas, Institute of Molecular Biology, University of Oregon",,,,,,,,,,,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,novaseq_era,unknown,cdna_unspecified,trueseq,bulk,unknown,unknown,,United States,2025-03-27,Adult,Adult,Fin,Surface Structure 35561,SRR32880277,SRX28160880,SRS24513818,SRP573530,PRJNA1242724,Early exercise disrupts a pro repair extracellular matrix program during zebrafish fin regeneration,GSE293062,Transcriptome Analysis,Understanding how mechanical stimulation affects cellular behaviors during tissue regeneration offers valuable insight into the mechanisms that regulate injury repair. We incorporated a swim tunnel exercise regimen during zebrafish caudal fin regeneration to explore exercise loading impacts on a robust model of tissue regeneration. Early exercise loading initiated before or during blastema formation resulted in reduced regenerative outcomes. Long term tracking of fluorescently labeled cell lineages showed exercise loading disrupted blastemal mesenchyme formation. Transcriptomic profiling and section staining indicated loading reduced an extracellular matrix ECM gene expression program including for hyaluronic acid HA synthesis. Like exercise loading HA synthesis inhibition or blastemal HA depletion disrupted blastema formation. We considered if injury upregulated HA establishes a pro regenerative environment facilitating mechanotransduction. HA density across the blastema correlated with nuclear localization of the mechanotransducer Yes associated protein Yap. Further exercise loading or HA depletion decreased nuclear Yap and Proliferative Cell Nuclear Antigen staining. We conclude early loading during fin regeneration disrupts expression of an HA rich ECM supporting blastema expansion. Our study of mechanical loading during fin regeneration reveals a stage dependent response similar to that seen in mammalian skeletal repair where early exercise—applied during blastema establishment—impairs regeneration while delayed loading during outgrowth does not suggesting a conserved sensitivity to the timing and intensity of mechanical stimuli in regenerative processes. Overall design: RNAseq profiling of 3 day post amputation fin regenerate blastema tissue following either swimming exercise exp or unexercised controls control,,,,3dpa blastema exercised exp bio rep 1,GSM8875049,,source name:whole caudal fin 3 dpa blastema|tissue:whole caudal fin 3 dpa blastema|genotype:WT|treatment:Swim exercised|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing,3dpa blastema exercised exp bio rep 1,Reads were aligned with Kallisto Pachter lab against zebrafish reference transcriptome. Assembly: GRCz11 Supplementary files format and content: .h5 counts abundance files,whole caudal fin 3 dpa blastema,Fish with caudal fin amputations were exercised twice at 48 and 72 hours post amputation and then whole regenerate fin tissue collected into Trizol reagent on ice 4 hours later.,RNA was prepared using a Direct Zol RNA prep kit Zymogenetics and eluted into water. RNA was pooled from 2 male and 2 female size matched fish for each replicate with replicates spanning two independent swimming cohorts. Libraries were prepared with 1 ug of input RNA using a TruSeq library prep kit indexed and pooled and sequenced using an Illumina NovaSeq 6000 to a read depth of approximately 25 million reads per library.,Zebrafish age 3 month 12 month were housed at approximately 28.5°C. Animals were maintained on a 14:10 day:night cycle and fed twice daily,tissue:whole caudal fin 3 dpa blastema|genotype:WT|treatment:Swim exercised,GSM8875049,GSM8875049: 3dpa blastema exercised exp bio rep 1; Danio rerio; RNA Seq,GSM8875049 r1,GSM8875049,1,RNA was prepared using a Direct Zol RNA prep kit Zymogenetics and eluted into water. RNA was pooled from 2 male and 2 female size matched fish for each replicate with replicates spanning two independent swimming cohorts. Libraries were prepared with 1 ug of input RNA using a TruSeq library prep kit indexed and pooled and sequenced using an Illumina NovaSeq 6000 to a read depth of approximately 25 million reads per library.,,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,cDNA,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,Illumina NovaSeq 6000,,SRP573530,,,Exp_1_raw.fastq.gz,fastq,3744436322.0,30692101.0,GSM8875049 r1,0:122,A:1050863937;C:775277972;G:866627322;T:1051571183;N:95908,122,,,,1050863937,775277972,866627322,1051571183,95908,SRX28160880,SRS24513818,SRA2100952,"Stankunas, Institute of Molecular Biology, University of Oregon","Stankunas, Institute of Molecular Biology, University of Oregon",,,,,,,,,,,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,novaseq_era,unknown,cdna_unspecified,trueseq,bulk,unknown,unknown,,United States,2025-03-27,Adult,Adult,Fin,Surface Structure 35562,SRR32880278,SRX28160879,SRS24513817,SRP573530,PRJNA1242724,Early exercise disrupts a pro repair extracellular matrix program during zebrafish fin regeneration,GSE293062,Transcriptome Analysis,Understanding how mechanical stimulation affects cellular behaviors during tissue regeneration offers valuable insight into the mechanisms that regulate injury repair. We incorporated a swim tunnel exercise regimen during zebrafish caudal fin regeneration to explore exercise loading impacts on a robust model of tissue regeneration. Early exercise loading initiated before or during blastema formation resulted in reduced regenerative outcomes. Long term tracking of fluorescently labeled cell lineages showed exercise loading disrupted blastemal mesenchyme formation. Transcriptomic profiling and section staining indicated loading reduced an extracellular matrix ECM gene expression program including for hyaluronic acid HA synthesis. Like exercise loading HA synthesis inhibition or blastemal HA depletion disrupted blastema formation. We considered if injury upregulated HA establishes a pro regenerative environment facilitating mechanotransduction. HA density across the blastema correlated with nuclear localization of the mechanotransducer Yes associated protein Yap. Further exercise loading or HA depletion decreased nuclear Yap and Proliferative Cell Nuclear Antigen staining. We conclude early loading during fin regeneration disrupts expression of an HA rich ECM supporting blastema expansion. Our study of mechanical loading during fin regeneration reveals a stage dependent response similar to that seen in mammalian skeletal repair where early exercise—applied during blastema establishment—impairs regeneration while delayed loading during outgrowth does not suggesting a conserved sensitivity to the timing and intensity of mechanical stimuli in regenerative processes. Overall design: RNAseq profiling of 3 day post amputation fin regenerate blastema tissue following either swimming exercise exp or unexercised controls control,,,,3dpa blastema unexercised control bio rep 5,GSM8875048,,source name:whole caudal fin 3 dpa blastema|tissue:whole caudal fin 3 dpa blastema|genotype:WT|treatment:Control|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing,3dpa blastema unexercised control bio rep 5,Reads were aligned with Kallisto Pachter lab against zebrafish reference transcriptome. Assembly: GRCz11 Supplementary files format and content: .h5 counts abundance files,whole caudal fin 3 dpa blastema,Fish with caudal fin amputations were exercised twice at 48 and 72 hours post amputation and then whole regenerate fin tissue collected into Trizol reagent on ice 4 hours later.,RNA was prepared using a Direct Zol RNA prep kit Zymogenetics and eluted into water. RNA was pooled from 2 male and 2 female size matched fish for each replicate with replicates spanning two independent swimming cohorts. Libraries were prepared with 1 ug of input RNA using a TruSeq library prep kit indexed and pooled and sequenced using an Illumina NovaSeq 6000 to a read depth of approximately 25 million reads per library.,Zebrafish age 3 month 12 month were housed at approximately 28.5°C. Animals were maintained on a 14:10 day:night cycle and fed twice daily,tissue:whole caudal fin 3 dpa blastema|genotype:WT|treatment:Control,GSM8875048,GSM8875048: 3dpa blastema unexercised control bio rep 5; Danio rerio; RNA Seq,GSM8875048 r1,GSM8875048,1,RNA was prepared using a Direct Zol RNA prep kit Zymogenetics and eluted into water. RNA was pooled from 2 male and 2 female size matched fish for each replicate with replicates spanning two independent swimming cohorts. Libraries were prepared with 1 ug of input RNA using a TruSeq library prep kit indexed and pooled and sequenced using an Illumina NovaSeq 6000 to a read depth of approximately 25 million reads per library.,,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,cDNA,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,Illumina NovaSeq 6000,,SRP573530,,,Control_5_raw.fastq.gz,fastq,3076092628.0,25213874.0,GSM8875048 r1,0:122,A:850913805;C:643783202;G:725071885;T:856245838;N:77898,122,,,,850913805,643783202,725071885,856245838,77898,SRX28160879,SRS24513817,SRA2100952,"Stankunas, Institute of Molecular Biology, University of Oregon","Stankunas, Institute of Molecular Biology, University of Oregon",,,,,,,,,,,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,novaseq_era,unknown,cdna_unspecified,trueseq,bulk,unknown,unknown,,United States,2025-03-27,Adult,Adult,Fin,Surface Structure 35563,SRR32880279,SRX28160878,SRS24513816,SRP573530,PRJNA1242724,Early exercise disrupts a pro repair extracellular matrix program during zebrafish fin regeneration,GSE293062,Transcriptome Analysis,Understanding how mechanical stimulation affects cellular behaviors during tissue regeneration offers valuable insight into the mechanisms that regulate injury repair. We incorporated a swim tunnel exercise regimen during zebrafish caudal fin regeneration to explore exercise loading impacts on a robust model of tissue regeneration. Early exercise loading initiated before or during blastema formation resulted in reduced regenerative outcomes. Long term tracking of fluorescently labeled cell lineages showed exercise loading disrupted blastemal mesenchyme formation. Transcriptomic profiling and section staining indicated loading reduced an extracellular matrix ECM gene expression program including for hyaluronic acid HA synthesis. Like exercise loading HA synthesis inhibition or blastemal HA depletion disrupted blastema formation. We considered if injury upregulated HA establishes a pro regenerative environment facilitating mechanotransduction. HA density across the blastema correlated with nuclear localization of the mechanotransducer Yes associated protein Yap. Further exercise loading or HA depletion decreased nuclear Yap and Proliferative Cell Nuclear Antigen staining. We conclude early loading during fin regeneration disrupts expression of an HA rich ECM supporting blastema expansion. Our study of mechanical loading during fin regeneration reveals a stage dependent response similar to that seen in mammalian skeletal repair where early exercise—applied during blastema establishment—impairs regeneration while delayed loading during outgrowth does not suggesting a conserved sensitivity to the timing and intensity of mechanical stimuli in regenerative processes. Overall design: RNAseq profiling of 3 day post amputation fin regenerate blastema tissue following either swimming exercise exp or unexercised controls control,,,,3dpa blastema unexercised control bio rep 4,GSM8875047,,source name:whole caudal fin 3 dpa blastema|tissue:whole caudal fin 3 dpa blastema|genotype:WT|treatment:Control|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing,3dpa blastema unexercised control bio rep 4,Reads were aligned with Kallisto Pachter lab against zebrafish reference transcriptome. Assembly: GRCz11 Supplementary files format and content: .h5 counts abundance files,whole caudal fin 3 dpa blastema,Fish with caudal fin amputations were exercised twice at 48 and 72 hours post amputation and then whole regenerate fin tissue collected into Trizol reagent on ice 4 hours later.,RNA was prepared using a Direct Zol RNA prep kit Zymogenetics and eluted into water. RNA was pooled from 2 male and 2 female size matched fish for each replicate with replicates spanning two independent swimming cohorts. Libraries were prepared with 1 ug of input RNA using a TruSeq library prep kit indexed and pooled and sequenced using an Illumina NovaSeq 6000 to a read depth of approximately 25 million reads per library.,Zebrafish age 3 month 12 month were housed at approximately 28.5°C. Animals were maintained on a 14:10 day:night cycle and fed twice daily,tissue:whole caudal fin 3 dpa blastema|genotype:WT|treatment:Control,GSM8875047,GSM8875047: 3dpa blastema unexercised control bio rep 4; Danio rerio; RNA Seq,GSM8875047 r1,GSM8875047,1,RNA was prepared using a Direct Zol RNA prep kit Zymogenetics and eluted into water. RNA was pooled from 2 male and 2 female size matched fish for each replicate with replicates spanning two independent swimming cohorts. Libraries were prepared with 1 ug of input RNA using a TruSeq library prep kit indexed and pooled and sequenced using an Illumina NovaSeq 6000 to a read depth of approximately 25 million reads per library.,,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,cDNA,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,Illumina NovaSeq 6000,,SRP573530,,,Control_4_raw.fastq.gz,fastq,3458014848.0,28344384.0,GSM8875047 r1,0:122,A:946385067;C:748704825;G:821787294;T:941050744;N:86918,122,,,,946385067,748704825,821787294,941050744,86918,SRX28160878,SRS24513816,SRA2100952,"Stankunas, Institute of Molecular Biology, University of Oregon","Stankunas, Institute of Molecular Biology, University of Oregon",,,,,,,,,,,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,novaseq_era,unknown,cdna_unspecified,trueseq,bulk,unknown,unknown,,United States,2025-03-27,Adult,Adult,Fin,Surface Structure 35564,SRR32880280,SRX28160877,SRS24513815,SRP573530,PRJNA1242724,Early exercise disrupts a pro repair extracellular matrix program during zebrafish fin regeneration,GSE293062,Transcriptome Analysis,Understanding how mechanical stimulation affects cellular behaviors during tissue regeneration offers valuable insight into the mechanisms that regulate injury repair. We incorporated a swim tunnel exercise regimen during zebrafish caudal fin regeneration to explore exercise loading impacts on a robust model of tissue regeneration. Early exercise loading initiated before or during blastema formation resulted in reduced regenerative outcomes. Long term tracking of fluorescently labeled cell lineages showed exercise loading disrupted blastemal mesenchyme formation. Transcriptomic profiling and section staining indicated loading reduced an extracellular matrix ECM gene expression program including for hyaluronic acid HA synthesis. Like exercise loading HA synthesis inhibition or blastemal HA depletion disrupted blastema formation. We considered if injury upregulated HA establishes a pro regenerative environment facilitating mechanotransduction. HA density across the blastema correlated with nuclear localization of the mechanotransducer Yes associated protein Yap. Further exercise loading or HA depletion decreased nuclear Yap and Proliferative Cell Nuclear Antigen staining. We conclude early loading during fin regeneration disrupts expression of an HA rich ECM supporting blastema expansion. Our study of mechanical loading during fin regeneration reveals a stage dependent response similar to that seen in mammalian skeletal repair where early exercise—applied during blastema establishment—impairs regeneration while delayed loading during outgrowth does not suggesting a conserved sensitivity to the timing and intensity of mechanical stimuli in regenerative processes. Overall design: RNAseq profiling of 3 day post amputation fin regenerate blastema tissue following either swimming exercise exp or unexercised controls control,,,,3dpa blastema unexercised control bio rep 3,GSM8875046,,source name:whole caudal fin 3 dpa blastema|tissue:whole caudal fin 3 dpa blastema|genotype:WT|treatment:Control|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing,3dpa blastema unexercised control bio rep 3,Reads were aligned with Kallisto Pachter lab against zebrafish reference transcriptome. Assembly: GRCz11 Supplementary files format and content: .h5 counts abundance files,whole caudal fin 3 dpa blastema,Fish with caudal fin amputations were exercised twice at 48 and 72 hours post amputation and then whole regenerate fin tissue collected into Trizol reagent on ice 4 hours later.,RNA was prepared using a Direct Zol RNA prep kit Zymogenetics and eluted into water. RNA was pooled from 2 male and 2 female size matched fish for each replicate with replicates spanning two independent swimming cohorts. Libraries were prepared with 1 ug of input RNA using a TruSeq library prep kit indexed and pooled and sequenced using an Illumina NovaSeq 6000 to a read depth of approximately 25 million reads per library.,Zebrafish age 3 month 12 month were housed at approximately 28.5°C. Animals were maintained on a 14:10 day:night cycle and fed twice daily,tissue:whole caudal fin 3 dpa blastema|genotype:WT|treatment:Control,GSM8875046,GSM8875046: 3dpa blastema unexercised control bio rep 3; Danio rerio; RNA Seq,GSM8875046 r1,GSM8875046,1,RNA was prepared using a Direct Zol RNA prep kit Zymogenetics and eluted into water. RNA was pooled from 2 male and 2 female size matched fish for each replicate with replicates spanning two independent swimming cohorts. Libraries were prepared with 1 ug of input RNA using a TruSeq library prep kit indexed and pooled and sequenced using an Illumina NovaSeq 6000 to a read depth of approximately 25 million reads per library.,,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,cDNA,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,Illumina NovaSeq 6000,,SRP573530,,,Control_3_raw.fastq.gz,fastq,3750141896.0,30738868.0,GSM8875046 r1,0:122,A:1016915650;C:830734179;G:908080650;T:994316527;N:94890,122,,,,1016915650,830734179,908080650,994316527,94890,SRX28160877,SRS24513815,SRA2100952,"Stankunas, Institute of Molecular Biology, University of Oregon","Stankunas, Institute of Molecular Biology, University of Oregon",,,,,,,,,,,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,novaseq_era,unknown,cdna_unspecified,trueseq,bulk,unknown,unknown,,United States,2025-03-27,Adult,Adult,Fin,Surface Structure 35565,SRR32880281,SRX28160876,SRS24513814,SRP573530,PRJNA1242724,Early exercise disrupts a pro repair extracellular matrix program during zebrafish fin regeneration,GSE293062,Transcriptome Analysis,Understanding how mechanical stimulation affects cellular behaviors during tissue regeneration offers valuable insight into the mechanisms that regulate injury repair. We incorporated a swim tunnel exercise regimen during zebrafish caudal fin regeneration to explore exercise loading impacts on a robust model of tissue regeneration. Early exercise loading initiated before or during blastema formation resulted in reduced regenerative outcomes. Long term tracking of fluorescently labeled cell lineages showed exercise loading disrupted blastemal mesenchyme formation. Transcriptomic profiling and section staining indicated loading reduced an extracellular matrix ECM gene expression program including for hyaluronic acid HA synthesis. Like exercise loading HA synthesis inhibition or blastemal HA depletion disrupted blastema formation. We considered if injury upregulated HA establishes a pro regenerative environment facilitating mechanotransduction. HA density across the blastema correlated with nuclear localization of the mechanotransducer Yes associated protein Yap. Further exercise loading or HA depletion decreased nuclear Yap and Proliferative Cell Nuclear Antigen staining. We conclude early loading during fin regeneration disrupts expression of an HA rich ECM supporting blastema expansion. Our study of mechanical loading during fin regeneration reveals a stage dependent response similar to that seen in mammalian skeletal repair where early exercise—applied during blastema establishment—impairs regeneration while delayed loading during outgrowth does not suggesting a conserved sensitivity to the timing and intensity of mechanical stimuli in regenerative processes. Overall design: RNAseq profiling of 3 day post amputation fin regenerate blastema tissue following either swimming exercise exp or unexercised controls control,,,,3dpa blastema unexercised control bio rep 2,GSM8875045,,source name:whole caudal fin 3 dpa blastema|tissue:whole caudal fin 3 dpa blastema|genotype:WT|treatment:Control|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing,3dpa blastema unexercised control bio rep 2,Reads were aligned with Kallisto Pachter lab against zebrafish reference transcriptome. Assembly: GRCz11 Supplementary files format and content: .h5 counts abundance files,whole caudal fin 3 dpa blastema,Fish with caudal fin amputations were exercised twice at 48 and 72 hours post amputation and then whole regenerate fin tissue collected into Trizol reagent on ice 4 hours later.,RNA was prepared using a Direct Zol RNA prep kit Zymogenetics and eluted into water. RNA was pooled from 2 male and 2 female size matched fish for each replicate with replicates spanning two independent swimming cohorts. Libraries were prepared with 1 ug of input RNA using a TruSeq library prep kit indexed and pooled and sequenced using an Illumina NovaSeq 6000 to a read depth of approximately 25 million reads per library.,Zebrafish age 3 month 12 month were housed at approximately 28.5°C. Animals were maintained on a 14:10 day:night cycle and fed twice daily,tissue:whole caudal fin 3 dpa blastema|genotype:WT|treatment:Control,GSM8875045,GSM8875045: 3dpa blastema unexercised control bio rep 2; Danio rerio; RNA Seq,GSM8875045 r1,GSM8875045,1,RNA was prepared using a Direct Zol RNA prep kit Zymogenetics and eluted into water. RNA was pooled from 2 male and 2 female size matched fish for each replicate with replicates spanning two independent swimming cohorts. Libraries were prepared with 1 ug of input RNA using a TruSeq library prep kit indexed and pooled and sequenced using an Illumina NovaSeq 6000 to a read depth of approximately 25 million reads per library.,,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,cDNA,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,Illumina NovaSeq 6000,,SRP573530,,,Control_2_raw.fastq.gz,fastq,3559797740.0,29178670.0,GSM8875045 r1,0:122,A:940502236;C:815297194;G:877321806;T:926584991;N:91513,122,,,,940502236,815297194,877321806,926584991,91513,SRX28160876,SRS24513814,SRA2100952,"Stankunas, Institute of Molecular Biology, University of Oregon","Stankunas, Institute of Molecular Biology, University of Oregon",,,,,,,,,,,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,novaseq_era,unknown,cdna_unspecified,trueseq,bulk,unknown,unknown,,United States,2025-03-27,Adult,Adult,Fin,Surface Structure 35566,SRR32880282,SRX28160875,SRS24513812,SRP573530,PRJNA1242724,Early exercise disrupts a pro repair extracellular matrix program during zebrafish fin regeneration,GSE293062,Transcriptome Analysis,Understanding how mechanical stimulation affects cellular behaviors during tissue regeneration offers valuable insight into the mechanisms that regulate injury repair. We incorporated a swim tunnel exercise regimen during zebrafish caudal fin regeneration to explore exercise loading impacts on a robust model of tissue regeneration. Early exercise loading initiated before or during blastema formation resulted in reduced regenerative outcomes. Long term tracking of fluorescently labeled cell lineages showed exercise loading disrupted blastemal mesenchyme formation. Transcriptomic profiling and section staining indicated loading reduced an extracellular matrix ECM gene expression program including for hyaluronic acid HA synthesis. Like exercise loading HA synthesis inhibition or blastemal HA depletion disrupted blastema formation. We considered if injury upregulated HA establishes a pro regenerative environment facilitating mechanotransduction. HA density across the blastema correlated with nuclear localization of the mechanotransducer Yes associated protein Yap. Further exercise loading or HA depletion decreased nuclear Yap and Proliferative Cell Nuclear Antigen staining. We conclude early loading during fin regeneration disrupts expression of an HA rich ECM supporting blastema expansion. Our study of mechanical loading during fin regeneration reveals a stage dependent response similar to that seen in mammalian skeletal repair where early exercise—applied during blastema establishment—impairs regeneration while delayed loading during outgrowth does not suggesting a conserved sensitivity to the timing and intensity of mechanical stimuli in regenerative processes. Overall design: RNAseq profiling of 3 day post amputation fin regenerate blastema tissue following either swimming exercise exp or unexercised controls control,,,,3dpa blastema unexercised control bio rep 1,GSM8875044,,source name:whole caudal fin 3 dpa blastema|tissue:whole caudal fin 3 dpa blastema|genotype:WT|treatment:Control|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing,3dpa blastema unexercised control bio rep 1,Reads were aligned with Kallisto Pachter lab against zebrafish reference transcriptome. Assembly: GRCz11 Supplementary files format and content: .h5 counts abundance files,whole caudal fin 3 dpa blastema,Fish with caudal fin amputations were exercised twice at 48 and 72 hours post amputation and then whole regenerate fin tissue collected into Trizol reagent on ice 4 hours later.,RNA was prepared using a Direct Zol RNA prep kit Zymogenetics and eluted into water. RNA was pooled from 2 male and 2 female size matched fish for each replicate with replicates spanning two independent swimming cohorts. Libraries were prepared with 1 ug of input RNA using a TruSeq library prep kit indexed and pooled and sequenced using an Illumina NovaSeq 6000 to a read depth of approximately 25 million reads per library.,Zebrafish age 3 month 12 month were housed at approximately 28.5°C. Animals were maintained on a 14:10 day:night cycle and fed twice daily,tissue:whole caudal fin 3 dpa blastema|genotype:WT|treatment:Control,GSM8875044,GSM8875044: 3dpa blastema unexercised control bio rep 1; Danio rerio; RNA Seq,GSM8875044 r1,GSM8875044,1,RNA was prepared using a Direct Zol RNA prep kit Zymogenetics and eluted into water. RNA was pooled from 2 male and 2 female size matched fish for each replicate with replicates spanning two independent swimming cohorts. Libraries were prepared with 1 ug of input RNA using a TruSeq library prep kit indexed and pooled and sequenced using an Illumina NovaSeq 6000 to a read depth of approximately 25 million reads per library.,,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,cDNA,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,Illumina NovaSeq 6000,,SRP573530,,,Control_1_raw.fastq.gz,fastq,3410581248.0,27955584.0,GSM8875044 r1,0:122,A:908666390;C:784237057;G:832115119;T:885476069;N:86613,122,,,,908666390,784237057,832115119,885476069,86613,SRX28160875,SRS24513812,SRA2100952,"Stankunas, Institute of Molecular Biology, University of Oregon","Stankunas, Institute of Molecular Biology, University of Oregon",,,,,,,,,,,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,novaseq_era,unknown,cdna_unspecified,trueseq,bulk,unknown,unknown,,United States,2025-03-27,Adult,Adult,Fin,Surface Structure 36617,SRR941753,SRX326770,SRS463196,SRP027598,PRJNA187413,Danio rerio strain:EK Transcriptome or Gene expression,PRJNA187413,Transcriptome Analysis,Gene expression across the anteroposterior axis of the zebrafish pectoral fin.,,,tissue comprising posterior most 2 fin rays,Posterior pectoral fin replicate 2,Pos2,,strain:EK|isolate:4|age:6 Month|sex:female,,,,,,,,,RNA seq posterior pectoral fin replicate 2,Pectoral Posterior 2,1,1,,,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,other,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,Illumina HiSeq 2000,500Application ReadForward1,SRP027598,,,Pos_R2.fastq,fastq,2119489050.0,42389781.0,Pos R2,0:50,A:551122430;C:507870866;G:499494183;T:555469321;N:5532250,50,,,,551122430,507870866,499494183,555469321,5532250,SRX326770,SRS463196,SRA065677,Duke Cell Biology|Poss,"Poss Lab, Duke Cell Biology",1,0.90238,,0.08924,,0.71303,,0.43405,,50,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,hiseq_era,unknown,other,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,United States,2013-07-19,Adult,Adult,Fin,Surface Structure 36618,SRR941754,SRX326769,SRS463195,SRP027598,PRJNA187413,Danio rerio strain:EK Transcriptome or Gene expression,PRJNA187413,Transcriptome Analysis,Gene expression across the anteroposterior axis of the zebrafish pectoral fin.,,,tissue comprising posterior most 2 fin rays,Posterior pectoral fin replicate 1,Pos1,,strain:EK|isolate:3|age:6 Month|sex:female,,,,,,,,,RNA seq posterior pectoral fin replicate 1,Pectoral Fin Posterior 1,1,1,,,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,other,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,Illumina HiSeq 2000,500Application ReadForward1,SRP027598,,,,,1839141950.0,36782839.0,Pos R1,0:50,A:461313296;C:455413049;G:451484067;T:466101993;N:4829545,50,,,,461313296,455413049,451484067,466101993,4829545,SRX326769,SRS463195,SRA065677,Duke Cell Biology|Poss,"Poss Lab, Duke Cell Biology",1,0.91205,,0.06923,,0.71656,,0.42651,,50,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,hiseq_era,unknown,other,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,United States,2013-07-19,Adult,Adult,Fin,Surface Structure 36619,SRR941751,SRX326756,SRS463187,SRP027598,PRJNA187413,Danio rerio strain:EK Transcriptome or Gene expression,PRJNA187413,Transcriptome Analysis,Gene expression across the anteroposterior axis of the zebrafish pectoral fin.,,,tissue comprising anterior most 2 fin rays,Anterior pectoral fin replicate 2,Ant2,,strain:EK|isolate:2|age:6 Month|sex:female,,,,,,,,,RNA seq anterior pectoral fin replicate 2,Pectoral Fin Anterior 2,1,1,,,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,other,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,Illumina HiSeq 2000,500Application ReadForward1,SRP027598,,,Ant_R2.fastq,fastq,2146396250.0,42927925.0,Ant R2,0:50,A:562140204;C:509390346;G:501995610;T:567232459;N:5637631,50,,,,562140204,509390346,501995610,567232459,5637631,SRX326756,SRS463187,SRA065677,Duke Cell Biology|Poss,"Poss Lab, Duke Cell Biology",1,0.89956,,0.09279,,0.70997,,0.44847,,50,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,hiseq_era,unknown,other,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,United States,2013-07-19,Adult,Adult,Fin,Surface Structure 36620,SRR941749,SRX326754,SRS463185,SRP027598,PRJNA187413,Danio rerio strain:EK Transcriptome or Gene expression,PRJNA187413,Transcriptome Analysis,Gene expression across the anteroposterior axis of the zebrafish pectoral fin.,,,tissue comprising anterior most 2 fin rays,Anterior pectoral fin replicate 1,Ant1,,strain:EK|isolate:1|age:6 Month|sex:female,,,,,,,,,RNA seq anterior pectoral fin replicate 1,Pectoral Fin Anterior 1,1,1,,,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,other,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,Illumina HiSeq 2000,500Application ReadForward1,SRP027598,,,Ant_R1.fastq,fastq,2178096950.0,43561939.0,Ant R1,0:50,A:568580441;C:517705965;G:509551928;T:576519788;N:5738828,50,,,,568580441,517705965,509551928,576519788,5738828,SRX326754,SRS463185,SRA065677,Duke Cell Biology|Poss,"Poss Lab, Duke Cell Biology",1,0.89833,,0.08959,,0.71494,,0.44088,,50,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,hiseq_era,unknown,other,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,United States,2013-07-19,Adult,Adult,Fin,Surface Structure 39609,SRR1873571,SRX915251,SRS870223,SRP056014,PRJNA277780,Identification of small non coding RNAs in zebrafish,GSE66718,Transcriptome Analysis,MicroRNAs miRNAs are a new class of small RNAs of approximately 22 nucleotides in length that control eukaryotic gene expression by fine tuning mRNA translation. They regulate a wide variety of biological processes namely developmental timing cell differentiation cell proliferation immune response and infection. For this reason their identification is essential to understand eukaryotic biology. Their small size low abundance and high instability complicated early identification; however cloning/Sanger sequencing and new generation genome sequencing approaches overcame most technical hurdles and are being used for rapid miRNA identification in many eukaryotes. We have applied 454 DNA pyrosequencing technology to miRNA discovery in zebrafish Danio rerio. For this a series of cDNA libraries were prepared from small non coding RNAs isolated at different embryonic time points and from fully developed organs. Each cDNA library was tagged with specific sequences and was sequenced using the Roche FLX genome sequencer. This approach retrieved 90% of the 192 miRNAs previously identified by cloning/Sanger sequencing and bioinformatics and 25 novel miRNAs were predicted. Overall design: Small RNA libraries were prepared from different zebrafish developmental stages namely 24 hpf 72 hpf 96 hpf 5 dpf dpf 45 dpf young adult and from adult brain eyes gills heart skin and fins.,,pubmed:26694924,,fins,GSM1630515,,source name:adult fins 1 year old|strain/background:AB|genotype/variation:wild type|tissue:fins|developmental stage:adult|age:1 year,fins,Base calling and quality trimming of sequence reads was carried out using the Genome Sequencer FLX software. Raw images were processed to remove background noise and the data was normalized. TAGs and adapter sequences of zebrafish developmental and adult tissues samples were then identified and trimmed and those reads with correct TAGs and adapters > 15 nt were retrieved for downstream analysis using the miRDeep software https://www.mdc berlin.de/8551903/en/. miRDeep aligned the sequences against the zebrafish genome using megaBlast with seed length set at 12 the traditional blast output and minimum local identity set at 100. The blast output was then parsed for miRDeep uploading and aligned sequences with a maximum of 2 mismatches in the three prime end were retrieved. Reads that matched more than 10 different genome loci were discarded and only those with one or more alignments were kept and using the remaining alignments as guidelines the potential precursors were excised from the genome. The secondary structure of putative precursors was predicted using RNAfold and signatures were created by retaining reads that aligned perfectly with those putative precursors to generate the signature format. Finally miRDeep predicted miRNAs by discarding non plausible Dicer products and scoring plausible ones. To assess seed conservation plausible Dicer processing sequences were blasted against a local version of mature miRNAs from miRBase 12.0 that lacked zebrafish miRNA sequences. Borderline miRNA candidates were also resolved by determining their relative stability using Randfold. To distinguish between novel and known miRNAs selected pre miRNAs were blasted against Danio rerio stem loop sequences miRBase and those that did not produce any or produced imperfect alignments were scored as novel miRNAs. Pairs of signatures and structures were used to estimate the number of false positives by randomly permutation using miRDeep. To overcome the inherent lack of sensitivity of miRDeep novel transcripts encoding miRNAs predicted by bioinformatics were retrieved from Ensembl 5.2 using BioMart and from literature predictions. These sequences were then used to perform a megaBlast search against our data with seed length set at 12. The transcripts with perfect matches and alignment length larger than 18 nt were kept for further processing. These transcripts were then compared with the mature miRNAs present in miRBase 12.0 and those that produced imperfect alignments or did not produce alignments were considered new miRNAs. Read numbers were normalized as described by Chen and colleagues Genes & Development 2005 19:1288 1293 and a miRNA expression profile using identical number of reads for each sample was generated. The number of reads between samples was normalized as indicated below: Expression Reads = [1000 x NRmiRNAXY]/ TNRmiRNAsY where NRmiRNAXY is the number of reads of miRNAX X = any miRNA in sample Y and TNRmiRNAsY is the total number of miRNAs in sample Y. 1000 is an arbitrary number of reads. The data was transformed into log2 scale to build the heat map using the MeV 4.0 software package http://www.tm4.org/mev.html. Genome build: Zv8 Supplementary files format and content: Tab delimited text files include the miRNA IDs sequences and respective raw counts post data processing for each sample.,adult fins 1 year old,,"100 μg of total RNA from each sample was isolated using TRIzol® and small RNAs were enriched by differential precipitation using polyethylene glycol. Total RNAs were fractioned using 12% denaturing PAGE and small RNAs of 15 30 nt were gel isolated using Gel Filtration cartridges from Edge Biosystems. For cDNA synthesis the small RNA molecules previously isolated were first ligated to a three prime adapter AMP five primep five primep/CTGTAGGCACCATCAATdi deoxyC three prime in absence of ATP and gel excised in the range of 35 and 50 nt. A second ligation was performed with the five prime adapter ""Nelson's linker"" five primeATCGTrArGrGrCrArCrCrUrGrArArA three prime for 1 hour at 37°C followed by phenol extraction. First strand cDNA synthesis was then performed using a specific three prime primer and Superscript™ III reverse transcriptase Invitrogen. RNase H treated cDNA was PCR amplified with adapter specific primers. Each sample contained a specific TAG constituted by 3 nucleotides as detailed next. 24hpf ATC; 72hpf ACT; 96hpf CAG; 5dpf ATG; 45dpf CCG; entire adult GTA; brain CGG; Heart CTG; Eyes GCT; fins GTT; skin TAC; gills TCC. PCR products were then run on 10% denaturing PAGE containing 7 M urea and the corresponding band 100 nt was eluted from the gel with Probe Elution Buffer from Ambion at 37°C overnight. These products were used for the emulsion PCR. Parallel DNA pyrosequencing was performed using the Genome Sequencer FLX Roche following established protocols for DNA library sequencing.",Wild type AB zebrafish strain was maintained at 28ºC on a 14 h light/10 h dark cycle.,strain/background:AB|genotype/variation:wild type|tissue:fins|developmental stage:adult|age:1 year,GSM1630515,GSM1630515: fins; Danio rerio; miRNA Seq,GSM1630515,,1,"100 μg of total RNA from each sample was isolated using TRIzol® and small RNAs were enriched by differential precipitation using polyethylene glycol. Total RNAs were fractioned using 12% denaturing PAGE and small RNAs of 15 30 nt were gel isolated using Gel Filtration cartridges from Edge Biosystems. For cDNA synthesis the small RNA molecules previously isolated were first ligated to a three prime adapter AMP five primep five primep/CTGTAGGCACCATCAATdi deoxyC three prime in absence of ATP and gel excised in the range of 35 and 50 nt. A second ligation was performed with the five prime adapter ""Nelson's linker"" five primeATCGTrArGrGrCrArCrCrUrGrArArA three prime for 1 hour at 37°C followed by phenol extraction. First strand cDNA synthesis was then performed using a specific three prime primer and Superscript™ III reverse transcriptase Invitrogen. RNase H treated cDNA was PCR amplified with adapter specific primers. Each sample contained a specific TAG constituted by 3 nucleotides as detailed next. 24hpf ATC; 72hpf ACT; 96hpf CAG; 5dpf ATG; 45dpf CCG; entire adult GTA; brain CGG; Heart CTG; Eyes GCT; fins GTT; skin TAC; gills TCC. PCR products were then run on 10% denaturing PAGE containing 7 M urea and the corresponding band 100 nt was eluted from the gel with Probe Elution Buffer from Ambion at 37°C overnight. These products were used for the emulsion PCR. Parallel DNA pyrosequencing was performed using the Genome Sequencer FLX Roche following established protocols for DNA library sequencing.",GEO Accession:GSM1630515,miRNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,size fractionation,SINGLE,LS454,454 GS FLX,,SRP056014,,,,,113161.0,2108.0,GSM1630515 r1,0:4 1:49.68,A:30303;C:30710;G:27210;T:24785;N:153,4,49,,,30303,30710,27210,24785,153,SRX915251,SRS870223,SRA246117,GEO,University of Aveiro,1,0.0,,0.0,,1.0,,,,50,,T,,under 1.2% mapping rate,legacy,early,3prime,size_fractionation,unknown,bulk,other_seq,454,,Portugal,2015-03-09,Adult,Adult,Fin,Surface Structure 40134,SRR2834938,SRX1389532,SRS1136849,SRP065355,PRJNA300314,Small RNA and mRNA expression profiling during zebrafish caudal fin regeneration,GSE74415,Transcriptome Analysis,Previous studies of zebrafish caudal fin regeneration have shown that multiple genetic programs are moduled through regulatory factors. MicroRNAs are short highly conserved non coding genes that suppress expression of target genes and thereby control multiple genetic programs. Given their important regulatory roles and evolutionary conservation we hypothesize that microRNAs define a conserved genetic regulatory circuit important for appendage regeneration. We characterized microRNA expression during zebrafish caudal fin regeneration using small RNA sequencing. The stages of caudal fin regeneration were assayed for mRNA expression using mRNA sequencing. Overall design: Small RNA and mRNA gene expression profiling during 0 and 4 dy post amputation.,,pubmed:27355827,,4dpa small RNA rep 3,GSM1920160,,source name:caudal fin|tissue:caudal fin|dy post amputation:4|library type:small RNA,4dpa small RNA rep 3,Reads were adapter clipped and quality filtered using FASTX Toolkit http://hannonlab.cshl.edu/fastx toolkit/ for small RNA and Trimmomatic Bolger et al. Bioinformatics 2010 for mRNA. Small RNA reads were collapsed reads were collapased using FASTX Toolkit and annotated using miRMiner Wheeler et al. Evol. Dev. 2009 and miRBase v. 21 Kozomara et al. Nucleic Acids Res 2014. MicroRNA read counts per sample were analyzed for differentially expression using R/edgeR Robinson et al. Bioinformatics 2010. mRNA reads were mapped to the zebrafish transcriptome Ensembl v. 76 annotation of zebrafish Zv9 assembly using RSEM Li and Dewey BMC Bioinformatics 2011. Differentially expressed transcripts were determined using R/edgeR. Genome build: zv9 Supplementary files format and content: Tab delimited text file with read counts per transcript per sample.,caudal fin,Caudal fins were amputated with scalpels following anesthesia 0.6mM MS222.,Total RNA was isolated using TRI Reagent Molecular Research Center Inc. Cincinnati OH following manufacturer’s protocol. Illumina TruSeq small RNA and strand specific PolyA+ mRNA libraries.,Adult Ekkwill EK zebrafish were housed and maintained in tanks at 22oC and exposed to a 12:12 hour light:dark cycle.,tissue:caudal fin|dy post amputation:4|library type:small RNA,GSM1920160,GSM1920160: 4dpa small RNA rep 3; Danio rerio; RNA Seq,GSM1920160,,1,Total RNA was isolated using TRI Reagent Molecular Research Center Inc. Cincinnati OH following manufacturer’s protocol. Illumina TruSeq small RNA and strand specific PolyA+ mRNA libraries.,GEO Accession:GSM1920160,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,cDNA,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,Illumina HiSeq 2000,,SRP065355,,,RPD2-A3_ATGTCA_L007_R1_001.fastq.gz,fastq,373679650.0,7473593.0,GSM1920160 r1,0:50,A:68694509;C:89847229;G:118844938;T:95955229;N:337745,50,,,,68694509,89847229,118844938,95955229,337745,SRX1389532,SRS1136849,SRA307553,GEO,"Molecular and Biomedical Sciences, University of Maine",1,0.11965,,0.00285,,0.99433,,0.52581,,50,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,hiseq_era,unknown,poly_a,trueseq,bulk,unknown,unknown,,United States,2015-10-27,Adult,Adult,Fin,Surface Structure 40135,SRR2834937,SRX1389531,SRS1136850,SRP065355,PRJNA300314,Small RNA and mRNA expression profiling during zebrafish caudal fin regeneration,GSE74415,Transcriptome Analysis,Previous studies of zebrafish caudal fin regeneration have shown that multiple genetic programs are moduled through regulatory factors. MicroRNAs are short highly conserved non coding genes that suppress expression of target genes and thereby control multiple genetic programs. Given their important regulatory roles and evolutionary conservation we hypothesize that microRNAs define a conserved genetic regulatory circuit important for appendage regeneration. We characterized microRNA expression during zebrafish caudal fin regeneration using small RNA sequencing. The stages of caudal fin regeneration were assayed for mRNA expression using mRNA sequencing. Overall design: Small RNA and mRNA gene expression profiling during 0 and 4 dy post amputation.,,pubmed:27355827,,4dpa small RNA rep 2,GSM1920159,,source name:caudal fin|tissue:caudal fin|dy post amputation:4|library type:small RNA,4dpa small RNA rep 2,Reads were adapter clipped and quality filtered using FASTX Toolkit http://hannonlab.cshl.edu/fastx toolkit/ for small RNA and Trimmomatic Bolger et al. Bioinformatics 2010 for mRNA. Small RNA reads were collapsed reads were collapased using FASTX Toolkit and annotated using miRMiner Wheeler et al. Evol. Dev. 2009 and miRBase v. 21 Kozomara et al. Nucleic Acids Res 2014. MicroRNA read counts per sample were analyzed for differentially expression using R/edgeR Robinson et al. Bioinformatics 2010. mRNA reads were mapped to the zebrafish transcriptome Ensembl v. 76 annotation of zebrafish Zv9 assembly using RSEM Li and Dewey BMC Bioinformatics 2011. Differentially expressed transcripts were determined using R/edgeR. Genome build: zv9 Supplementary files format and content: Tab delimited text file with read counts per transcript per sample.,caudal fin,Caudal fins were amputated with scalpels following anesthesia 0.6mM MS222.,Total RNA was isolated using TRI Reagent Molecular Research Center Inc. Cincinnati OH following manufacturer’s protocol. Illumina TruSeq small RNA and strand specific PolyA+ mRNA libraries.,Adult Ekkwill EK zebrafish were housed and maintained in tanks at 22oC and exposed to a 12:12 hour light:dark cycle.,tissue:caudal fin|dy post amputation:4|library type:small RNA,GSM1920159,GSM1920159: 4dpa small RNA rep 2; Danio rerio; RNA Seq,GSM1920159,,1,Total RNA was isolated using TRI Reagent Molecular Research Center Inc. Cincinnati OH following manufacturer’s protocol. Illumina TruSeq small RNA and strand specific PolyA+ mRNA libraries.,GEO Accession:GSM1920159,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,cDNA,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,Illumina HiSeq 2000,,SRP065355,,,RPD2-A2_AGTTCC_L007_R1_001.fastq.gz,fastq,445390000.0,8907800.0,GSM1920159 r1,0:50,A:81500522;C:106498774;G:142041440;T:114948557;N:400707,50,,,,81500522,106498774,142041440,114948557,400707,SRX1389531,SRS1136850,SRA307553,GEO,"Molecular and Biomedical Sciences, University of Maine",1,0.16246,,0.00439,,0.99506,,0.52311,,50,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,hiseq_era,unknown,poly_a,trueseq,bulk,unknown,unknown,,United States,2015-10-27,Adult,Adult,Fin,Surface Structure 40136,SRR2834936,SRX1389530,SRS1136851,SRP065355,PRJNA300314,Small RNA and mRNA expression profiling during zebrafish caudal fin regeneration,GSE74415,Transcriptome Analysis,Previous studies of zebrafish caudal fin regeneration have shown that multiple genetic programs are moduled through regulatory factors. MicroRNAs are short highly conserved non coding genes that suppress expression of target genes and thereby control multiple genetic programs. Given their important regulatory roles and evolutionary conservation we hypothesize that microRNAs define a conserved genetic regulatory circuit important for appendage regeneration. We characterized microRNA expression during zebrafish caudal fin regeneration using small RNA sequencing. The stages of caudal fin regeneration were assayed for mRNA expression using mRNA sequencing. Overall design: Small RNA and mRNA gene expression profiling during 0 and 4 dy post amputation.,,pubmed:27355827,,4dpa small RNA rep 1,GSM1920158,,source name:caudal fin|tissue:caudal fin|dy post amputation:4|library type:small RNA,4dpa small RNA rep 1,Reads were adapter clipped and quality filtered using FASTX Toolkit http://hannonlab.cshl.edu/fastx toolkit/ for small RNA and Trimmomatic Bolger et al. Bioinformatics 2010 for mRNA. Small RNA reads were collapsed reads were collapased using FASTX Toolkit and annotated using miRMiner Wheeler et al. Evol. Dev. 2009 and miRBase v. 21 Kozomara et al. Nucleic Acids Res 2014. MicroRNA read counts per sample were analyzed for differentially expression using R/edgeR Robinson et al. Bioinformatics 2010. mRNA reads were mapped to the zebrafish transcriptome Ensembl v. 76 annotation of zebrafish Zv9 assembly using RSEM Li and Dewey BMC Bioinformatics 2011. Differentially expressed transcripts were determined using R/edgeR. Genome build: zv9 Supplementary files format and content: Tab delimited text file with read counts per transcript per sample.,caudal fin,Caudal fins were amputated with scalpels following anesthesia 0.6mM MS222.,Total RNA was isolated using TRI Reagent Molecular Research Center Inc. Cincinnati OH following manufacturer’s protocol. Illumina TruSeq small RNA and strand specific PolyA+ mRNA libraries.,Adult Ekkwill EK zebrafish were housed and maintained in tanks at 22oC and exposed to a 12:12 hour light:dark cycle.,tissue:caudal fin|dy post amputation:4|library type:small RNA,GSM1920158,GSM1920158: 4dpa small RNA rep 1; Danio rerio; RNA Seq,GSM1920158,,1,Total RNA was isolated using TRI Reagent Molecular Research Center Inc. Cincinnati OH following manufacturer’s protocol. Illumina TruSeq small RNA and strand specific PolyA+ mRNA libraries.,GEO Accession:GSM1920158,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,cDNA,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,Illumina HiSeq 2000,,SRP065355,,,RPD2-A1_AGTCAA_L007_R1_001.fastq.gz,fastq,447070900.0,8941418.0,GSM1920158 r1,0:50,A:81330845;C:108093874;G:142869603;T:114376524;N:400054,50,,,,81330845,108093874,142869603,114376524,400054,SRX1389530,SRS1136851,SRA307553,GEO,"Molecular and Biomedical Sciences, University of Maine",1,0.19014,,0.00382,,0.99484,,0.52592,,50,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,hiseq_era,unknown,poly_a,trueseq,bulk,unknown,unknown,,United States,2015-10-27,Adult,Adult,Fin,Surface Structure 40137,SRR2834935,SRX1389529,SRS1136852,SRP065355,PRJNA300314,Small RNA and mRNA expression profiling during zebrafish caudal fin regeneration,GSE74415,Transcriptome Analysis,Previous studies of zebrafish caudal fin regeneration have shown that multiple genetic programs are moduled through regulatory factors. MicroRNAs are short highly conserved non coding genes that suppress expression of target genes and thereby control multiple genetic programs. Given their important regulatory roles and evolutionary conservation we hypothesize that microRNAs define a conserved genetic regulatory circuit important for appendage regeneration. We characterized microRNA expression during zebrafish caudal fin regeneration using small RNA sequencing. The stages of caudal fin regeneration were assayed for mRNA expression using mRNA sequencing. Overall design: Small RNA and mRNA gene expression profiling during 0 and 4 dy post amputation.,,pubmed:27355827,,0dpa small RNA rep 3,GSM1920157,,source name:caudal fin|tissue:caudal fin|dy post amputation:0|library type:small RNA,0dpa small RNA rep 3,Reads were adapter clipped and quality filtered using FASTX Toolkit http://hannonlab.cshl.edu/fastx toolkit/ for small RNA and Trimmomatic Bolger et al. Bioinformatics 2010 for mRNA. Small RNA reads were collapsed reads were collapased using FASTX Toolkit and annotated using miRMiner Wheeler et al. Evol. Dev. 2009 and miRBase v. 21 Kozomara et al. Nucleic Acids Res 2014. MicroRNA read counts per sample were analyzed for differentially expression using R/edgeR Robinson et al. Bioinformatics 2010. mRNA reads were mapped to the zebrafish transcriptome Ensembl v. 76 annotation of zebrafish Zv9 assembly using RSEM Li and Dewey BMC Bioinformatics 2011. Differentially expressed transcripts were determined using R/edgeR. Genome build: zv9 Supplementary files format and content: Tab delimited text file with read counts per transcript per sample.,caudal fin,Caudal fins were amputated with scalpels following anesthesia 0.6mM MS222.,Total RNA was isolated using TRI Reagent Molecular Research Center Inc. Cincinnati OH following manufacturer’s protocol. Illumina TruSeq small RNA and strand specific PolyA+ mRNA libraries.,Adult Ekkwill EK zebrafish were housed and maintained in tanks at 22oC and exposed to a 12:12 hour light:dark cycle.,tissue:caudal fin|dy post amputation:0|library type:small RNA,GSM1920157,GSM1920157: 0dpa small RNA rep 3; Danio rerio; RNA Seq,GSM1920157,,1,Total RNA was isolated using TRI Reagent Molecular Research Center Inc. Cincinnati OH following manufacturer’s protocol. Illumina TruSeq small RNA and strand specific PolyA+ mRNA libraries.,GEO Accession:GSM1920157,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,cDNA,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,Illumina HiSeq 2000,,SRP065355,,,UPD2-A3_GCCAAT_L007_R1_001.fastq.gz,fastq,262275650.0,5245513.0,GSM1920157 r1,0:50,A:50807514;C:65746360;G:82912384;T:62571646;N:237746,50,,,,50807514,65746360,82912384,62571646,237746,SRX1389529,SRS1136852,SRA307553,GEO,"Molecular and Biomedical Sciences, University of Maine",1,0.13825,,0.00592,,0.99401,,0.53009,,50,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,hiseq_era,unknown,poly_a,trueseq,bulk,unknown,unknown,,United States,2015-10-27,Adult,Adult,Fin,Surface Structure 40138,SRR2834934,SRX1389528,SRS1136853,SRP065355,PRJNA300314,Small RNA and mRNA expression profiling during zebrafish caudal fin regeneration,GSE74415,Transcriptome Analysis,Previous studies of zebrafish caudal fin regeneration have shown that multiple genetic programs are moduled through regulatory factors. MicroRNAs are short highly conserved non coding genes that suppress expression of target genes and thereby control multiple genetic programs. Given their important regulatory roles and evolutionary conservation we hypothesize that microRNAs define a conserved genetic regulatory circuit important for appendage regeneration. We characterized microRNA expression during zebrafish caudal fin regeneration using small RNA sequencing. The stages of caudal fin regeneration were assayed for mRNA expression using mRNA sequencing. Overall design: Small RNA and mRNA gene expression profiling during 0 and 4 dy post amputation.,,pubmed:27355827,,0dpa small RNA rep 2,GSM1920156,,source name:caudal fin|tissue:caudal fin|dy post amputation:0|library type:small RNA,0dpa small RNA rep 2,Reads were adapter clipped and quality filtered using FASTX Toolkit http://hannonlab.cshl.edu/fastx toolkit/ for small RNA and Trimmomatic Bolger et al. Bioinformatics 2010 for mRNA. Small RNA reads were collapsed reads were collapased using FASTX Toolkit and annotated using miRMiner Wheeler et al. Evol. Dev. 2009 and miRBase v. 21 Kozomara et al. Nucleic Acids Res 2014. MicroRNA read counts per sample were analyzed for differentially expression using R/edgeR Robinson et al. Bioinformatics 2010. mRNA reads were mapped to the zebrafish transcriptome Ensembl v. 76 annotation of zebrafish Zv9 assembly using RSEM Li and Dewey BMC Bioinformatics 2011. Differentially expressed transcripts were determined using R/edgeR. Genome build: zv9 Supplementary files format and content: Tab delimited text file with read counts per transcript per sample.,caudal fin,Caudal fins were amputated with scalpels following anesthesia 0.6mM MS222.,Total RNA was isolated using TRI Reagent Molecular Research Center Inc. Cincinnati OH following manufacturer’s protocol. Illumina TruSeq small RNA and strand specific PolyA+ mRNA libraries.,Adult Ekkwill EK zebrafish were housed and maintained in tanks at 22oC and exposed to a 12:12 hour light:dark cycle.,tissue:caudal fin|dy post amputation:0|library type:small RNA,GSM1920156,GSM1920156: 0dpa small RNA rep 2; Danio rerio; RNA Seq,GSM1920156,,1,Total RNA was isolated using TRI Reagent Molecular Research Center Inc. Cincinnati OH following manufacturer’s protocol. Illumina TruSeq small RNA and strand specific PolyA+ mRNA libraries.,GEO Accession:GSM1920156,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,cDNA,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,Illumina HiSeq 2000,,SRP065355,,,UPD2-A2_ACAGTG_L007_R1_001.fastq.gz,fastq,754057150.0,15081143.0,GSM1920156 r1,0:50,A:136745812;C:183633004;G:238526597;T:194475603;N:676134,50,,,,136745812,183633004,238526597,194475603,676134,SRX1389528,SRS1136853,SRA307553,GEO,"Molecular and Biomedical Sciences, University of Maine",1,0.09694,,0.00492,,0.99381,,0.54425,,50,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,hiseq_era,unknown,poly_a,trueseq,bulk,unknown,unknown,,United States,2015-10-27,Adult,Adult,Fin,Surface Structure 40139,SRR2834933,SRX1389527,SRS1136854,SRP065355,PRJNA300314,Small RNA and mRNA expression profiling during zebrafish caudal fin regeneration,GSE74415,Transcriptome Analysis,Previous studies of zebrafish caudal fin regeneration have shown that multiple genetic programs are moduled through regulatory factors. MicroRNAs are short highly conserved non coding genes that suppress expression of target genes and thereby control multiple genetic programs. Given their important regulatory roles and evolutionary conservation we hypothesize that microRNAs define a conserved genetic regulatory circuit important for appendage regeneration. We characterized microRNA expression during zebrafish caudal fin regeneration using small RNA sequencing. The stages of caudal fin regeneration were assayed for mRNA expression using mRNA sequencing. Overall design: Small RNA and mRNA gene expression profiling during 0 and 4 dy post amputation.,,pubmed:27355827,,0dpa small RNA rep 1,GSM1920155,,source name:caudal fin|tissue:caudal fin|dy post amputation:0|library type:small RNA,0dpa small RNA rep 1,Reads were adapter clipped and quality filtered using FASTX Toolkit http://hannonlab.cshl.edu/fastx toolkit/ for small RNA and Trimmomatic Bolger et al. Bioinformatics 2010 for mRNA. Small RNA reads were collapsed reads were collapased using FASTX Toolkit and annotated using miRMiner Wheeler et al. Evol. Dev. 2009 and miRBase v. 21 Kozomara et al. Nucleic Acids Res 2014. MicroRNA read counts per sample were analyzed for differentially expression using R/edgeR Robinson et al. Bioinformatics 2010. mRNA reads were mapped to the zebrafish transcriptome Ensembl v. 76 annotation of zebrafish Zv9 assembly using RSEM Li and Dewey BMC Bioinformatics 2011. Differentially expressed transcripts were determined using R/edgeR. Genome build: zv9 Supplementary files format and content: Tab delimited text file with read counts per transcript per sample.,caudal fin,Caudal fins were amputated with scalpels following anesthesia 0.6mM MS222.,Total RNA was isolated using TRI Reagent Molecular Research Center Inc. Cincinnati OH following manufacturer’s protocol. Illumina TruSeq small RNA and strand specific PolyA+ mRNA libraries.,Adult Ekkwill EK zebrafish were housed and maintained in tanks at 22oC and exposed to a 12:12 hour light:dark cycle.,tissue:caudal fin|dy post amputation:0|library type:small RNA,GSM1920155,GSM1920155: 0dpa small RNA rep 1; Danio rerio; RNA Seq,GSM1920155,,1,Total RNA was isolated using TRI Reagent Molecular Research Center Inc. Cincinnati OH following manufacturer’s protocol. Illumina TruSeq small RNA and strand specific PolyA+ mRNA libraries.,GEO Accession:GSM1920155,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,cDNA,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,Illumina HiSeq 2000,,SRP065355,,,UPD2-A1_TGACCA_L007_R1_001.fastq.gz,fastq,617544950.0,12350899.0,GSM1920155 r1,0:50,A:112140176;C:151825965;G:197163658;T:155854533;N:560618,50,,,,112140176,151825965,197163658,155854533,560618,SRX1389527,SRS1136854,SRA307553,GEO,"Molecular and Biomedical Sciences, University of Maine",1,0.10954,,0.00515,,0.99295,,0.553,,50,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,hiseq_era,unknown,poly_a,trueseq,bulk,unknown,unknown,,United States,2015-10-27,Adult,Adult,Fin,Surface Structure 40334,SRR3086895,SRX1518389,SRS1236744,SRP068114,PRJNA307985,Transcription profiling of zebrafish fin regeneration,GSE76564,Transcriptome Analysis,We compared transcriptional profiles of regenerating zebrafish caudal fins following fin amputation with profiles from uninjured zebrafish caudal fins Overall design: Examination of whole fin transcriptional profiles from regenerating fins 2 pools of 10 fins and uninjured fins 2 pools of 10 fins,,pubmed:27049946,,ZF Uninjured Fin 2,GSM2028020,,tissue:Uninjured fins|strain:EK|line:Wild type|treatment:N1,ZF Uninjured Fin 2,"Base calling with Casava Alignment with TopHat Counts summarized with R using TopHat output Analysis performed with EdgeR package of Bioconductor Genome build: Zv9 Supplementary files format and content: ""Regenerate fin counts.txt"" and ""Uninjured fin Control counts.txt"" is a tab delimited text file containing summarized counts for each transcript. This was the dataset entered into edgeR.",Uninjured fins,Fins were amputated to 50% of their original length using razor blades,Either uninjured fins or fins at 4 dy post amputation were collected. 10 fins were dissected rinsed in PBS placed in Trizol and homogenized. RNA was then extracted. Illumina RNA Seq 50 bp Single end libraries,,strain:EK|line:Wild type|treatment:N1,GSM2028020,GSM2028020: ZF Uninjured Fin 2; Danio rerio; RNA Seq,GSM2028020,,1,Either uninjured fins or fins at 4 dy post amputation were collected. 10 fins were dissected rinsed in PBS placed in Trizol and homogenized. RNA was then extracted. Illumina RNA Seq 50 bp Single end libraries,GEO Accession:GSM2028020,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,cDNA,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,Illumina Genome Analyzer II,,SRP068114,,,Un2-1.fastq.gz,fastq,800000000.0,16000000.0,GSM2028020 r1,0:50,A:210926663;C:190496048;G:184518152;T:213985916;N:73221,50,,,,210926663,190496048,184518152,213985916,73221,SRX1518389,SRS1236744,SRA329570,GEO,"Kenneth Poss lab, Department of Cell Biology, Duke University Medical Center",1,0.91126,,0.08857,,0.72054,,0.44807,,50,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,early_illumina,full_length,random_priming,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,United States,2016-01-05,Undetermined,Undetermined,Fin,Surface Structure 40335,SRR3086896,SRX1518389,SRS1236744,SRP068114,PRJNA307985,Transcription profiling of zebrafish fin regeneration,GSE76564,Transcriptome Analysis,We compared transcriptional profiles of regenerating zebrafish caudal fins following fin amputation with profiles from uninjured zebrafish caudal fins Overall design: Examination of whole fin transcriptional profiles from regenerating fins 2 pools of 10 fins and uninjured fins 2 pools of 10 fins,,pubmed:27049946,,ZF Uninjured Fin 2,GSM2028020,,tissue:Uninjured fins|strain:EK|line:Wild type|treatment:N1,ZF Uninjured Fin 2,"Base calling with Casava Alignment with TopHat Counts summarized with R using TopHat output Analysis performed with EdgeR package of Bioconductor Genome build: Zv9 Supplementary files format and content: ""Regenerate fin counts.txt"" and ""Uninjured fin Control counts.txt"" is a tab delimited text file containing summarized counts for each transcript. This was the dataset entered into edgeR.",Uninjured fins,Fins were amputated to 50% of their original length using razor blades,Either uninjured fins or fins at 4 dy post amputation were collected. 10 fins were dissected rinsed in PBS placed in Trizol and homogenized. RNA was then extracted. Illumina RNA Seq 50 bp Single end libraries,,strain:EK|line:Wild type|treatment:N1,GSM2028020,GSM2028020: ZF Uninjured Fin 2; Danio rerio; RNA Seq,GSM2028020,,1,Either uninjured fins or fins at 4 dy post amputation were collected. 10 fins were dissected rinsed in PBS placed in Trizol and homogenized. RNA was then extracted. Illumina RNA Seq 50 bp Single end libraries,GEO Accession:GSM2028020,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,cDNA,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,Illumina Genome Analyzer II,,SRP068114,,,Un2-2.fastq.gz,fastq,800000000.0,16000000.0,GSM2028020 r2,0:50,A:210822728;C:190175530;G:185124231;T:213867287;N:10224,50,,,,210822728,190175530,185124231,213867287,10224,SRX1518389,SRS1236744,SRA329570,GEO,"Kenneth Poss lab, Department of Cell Biology, Duke University Medical Center",1,0.90559,,0.08872,,0.7194,,0.43319,,50,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,early_illumina,full_length,random_priming,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,United States,2016-01-05,Undetermined,Undetermined,Fin,Surface Structure 40336,SRR3086897,SRX1518389,SRS1236744,SRP068114,PRJNA307985,Transcription profiling of zebrafish fin regeneration,GSE76564,Transcriptome Analysis,We compared transcriptional profiles of regenerating zebrafish caudal fins following fin amputation with profiles from uninjured zebrafish caudal fins Overall design: Examination of whole fin transcriptional profiles from regenerating fins 2 pools of 10 fins and uninjured fins 2 pools of 10 fins,,pubmed:27049946,,ZF Uninjured Fin 2,GSM2028020,,tissue:Uninjured fins|strain:EK|line:Wild type|treatment:N1,ZF Uninjured Fin 2,"Base calling with Casava Alignment with TopHat Counts summarized with R using TopHat output Analysis performed with EdgeR package of Bioconductor Genome build: Zv9 Supplementary files format and content: ""Regenerate fin counts.txt"" and ""Uninjured fin Control counts.txt"" is a tab delimited text file containing summarized counts for each transcript. This was the dataset entered into edgeR.",Uninjured fins,Fins were amputated to 50% of their original length using razor blades,Either uninjured fins or fins at 4 dy post amputation were collected. 10 fins were dissected rinsed in PBS placed in Trizol and homogenized. RNA was then extracted. Illumina RNA Seq 50 bp Single end libraries,,strain:EK|line:Wild type|treatment:N1,GSM2028020,GSM2028020: ZF Uninjured Fin 2; Danio rerio; RNA Seq,GSM2028020,,1,Either uninjured fins or fins at 4 dy post amputation were collected. 10 fins were dissected rinsed in PBS placed in Trizol and homogenized. RNA was then extracted. Illumina RNA Seq 50 bp Single end libraries,GEO Accession:GSM2028020,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,cDNA,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,Illumina Genome Analyzer II,,SRP068114,,,Un2-3.fastq.gz,fastq,46067800.0,921356.0,GSM2028020 r3,0:50,A:12182398;C:10879021;G:10673094;T:12333021;N:266,50,,,,12182398,10879021,10673094,12333021,266,SRX1518389,SRS1236744,SRA329570,GEO,"Kenneth Poss lab, Department of Cell Biology, Duke University Medical Center",1,0.89253,,0.08727,,0.72094,,0.45046,,50,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,early_illumina,full_length,random_priming,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,United States,2016-01-05,Undetermined,Undetermined,Fin,Surface Structure 40337,SRR3086892,SRX1518388,SRS1236746,SRP068114,PRJNA307985,Transcription profiling of zebrafish fin regeneration,GSE76564,Transcriptome Analysis,We compared transcriptional profiles of regenerating zebrafish caudal fins following fin amputation with profiles from uninjured zebrafish caudal fins Overall design: Examination of whole fin transcriptional profiles from regenerating fins 2 pools of 10 fins and uninjured fins 2 pools of 10 fins,,pubmed:27049946,,ZF Uninjured Fin 1,GSM2028019,,tissue:Uninjured fins|strain:EK|line:Wild type|treatment:N1,ZF Uninjured Fin 1,"Base calling with Casava Alignment with TopHat Counts summarized with R using TopHat output Analysis performed with EdgeR package of Bioconductor Genome build: Zv9 Supplementary files format and content: ""Regenerate fin counts.txt"" and ""Uninjured fin Control counts.txt"" is a tab delimited text file containing summarized counts for each transcript. This was the dataset entered into edgeR.",Uninjured fins,Fins were amputated to 50% of their original length using razor blades,Either uninjured fins or fins at 4 dy post amputation were collected. 10 fins were dissected rinsed in PBS placed in Trizol and homogenized. RNA was then extracted. Illumina RNA Seq 50 bp Single end libraries,,strain:EK|line:Wild type|treatment:N1,GSM2028019,GSM2028019: ZF Uninjured Fin 1; Danio rerio; RNA Seq,GSM2028019,,1,Either uninjured fins or fins at 4 dy post amputation were collected. 10 fins were dissected rinsed in PBS placed in Trizol and homogenized. RNA was then extracted. Illumina RNA Seq 50 bp Single end libraries,GEO Accession:GSM2028019,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,cDNA,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,Illumina Genome Analyzer II,,SRP068114,,,Un1-1.fastq.gz,fastq,800000000.0,16000000.0,GSM2028019 r1,0:50,A:206270357;C:193369997;G:191677237;T:208652195;N:30214,50,,,,206270357,193369997,191677237,208652195,30214,SRX1518388,SRS1236746,SRA329570,GEO,"Kenneth Poss lab, Department of Cell Biology, Duke University Medical Center",1,0.91334,,0.07414,,0.73034,,0.44343,,50,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,early_illumina,full_length,random_priming,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,United States,2016-01-05,Undetermined,Undetermined,Fin,Surface Structure 40338,SRR3086893,SRX1518388,SRS1236746,SRP068114,PRJNA307985,Transcription profiling of zebrafish fin regeneration,GSE76564,Transcriptome Analysis,We compared transcriptional profiles of regenerating zebrafish caudal fins following fin amputation with profiles from uninjured zebrafish caudal fins Overall design: Examination of whole fin transcriptional profiles from regenerating fins 2 pools of 10 fins and uninjured fins 2 pools of 10 fins,,pubmed:27049946,,ZF Uninjured Fin 1,GSM2028019,,tissue:Uninjured fins|strain:EK|line:Wild type|treatment:N1,ZF Uninjured Fin 1,"Base calling with Casava Alignment with TopHat Counts summarized with R using TopHat output Analysis performed with EdgeR package of Bioconductor Genome build: Zv9 Supplementary files format and content: ""Regenerate fin counts.txt"" and ""Uninjured fin Control counts.txt"" is a tab delimited text file containing summarized counts for each transcript. This was the dataset entered into edgeR.",Uninjured fins,Fins were amputated to 50% of their original length using razor blades,Either uninjured fins or fins at 4 dy post amputation were collected. 10 fins were dissected rinsed in PBS placed in Trizol and homogenized. RNA was then extracted. Illumina RNA Seq 50 bp Single end libraries,,strain:EK|line:Wild type|treatment:N1,GSM2028019,GSM2028019: ZF Uninjured Fin 1; Danio rerio; RNA Seq,GSM2028019,,1,Either uninjured fins or fins at 4 dy post amputation were collected. 10 fins were dissected rinsed in PBS placed in Trizol and homogenized. RNA was then extracted. Illumina RNA Seq 50 bp Single end libraries,GEO Accession:GSM2028019,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,cDNA,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,Illumina Genome Analyzer II,,SRP068114,,,Un1-2.fastq.gz,fastq,493137350.0,9862747.0,GSM2028019 r2,0:50,A:127272457;C:119005858;G:118176094;T:128679179;N:3762,50,,,,127272457,119005858,118176094,128679179,3762,SRX1518388,SRS1236746,SRA329570,GEO,"Kenneth Poss lab, Department of Cell Biology, Duke University Medical Center",1,0.90901,,0.07418,,0.73085,,0.44107,,50,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,early_illumina,full_length,random_priming,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,United States,2016-01-05,Undetermined,Undetermined,Fin,Surface Structure 40339,SRR3086894,SRX1518388,SRS1236746,SRP068114,PRJNA307985,Transcription profiling of zebrafish fin regeneration,GSE76564,Transcriptome Analysis,We compared transcriptional profiles of regenerating zebrafish caudal fins following fin amputation with profiles from uninjured zebrafish caudal fins Overall design: Examination of whole fin transcriptional profiles from regenerating fins 2 pools of 10 fins and uninjured fins 2 pools of 10 fins,,pubmed:27049946,,ZF Uninjured Fin 1,GSM2028019,,tissue:Uninjured fins|strain:EK|line:Wild type|treatment:N1,ZF Uninjured Fin 1,"Base calling with Casava Alignment with TopHat Counts summarized with R using TopHat output Analysis performed with EdgeR package of Bioconductor Genome build: Zv9 Supplementary files format and content: ""Regenerate fin counts.txt"" and ""Uninjured fin Control counts.txt"" is a tab delimited text file containing summarized counts for each transcript. This was the dataset entered into edgeR.",Uninjured fins,Fins were amputated to 50% of their original length using razor blades,Either uninjured fins or fins at 4 dy post amputation were collected. 10 fins were dissected rinsed in PBS placed in Trizol and homogenized. RNA was then extracted. Illumina RNA Seq 50 bp Single end libraries,,strain:EK|line:Wild type|treatment:N1,GSM2028019,GSM2028019: ZF Uninjured Fin 1; Danio rerio; RNA Seq,GSM2028019,,1,Either uninjured fins or fins at 4 dy post amputation were collected. 10 fins were dissected rinsed in PBS placed in Trizol and homogenized. RNA was then extracted. Illumina RNA Seq 50 bp Single end libraries,GEO Accession:GSM2028019,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,cDNA,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,Illumina Genome Analyzer II,,SRP068114,,,Un1-3.fastq.gz,fastq,800000000.0,16000000.0,GSM2028019 r3,0:50,A:206410293;C:193573258;G:191140232;T:208806339;N:69878,50,,,,206410293,193573258,191140232,208806339,69878,SRX1518388,SRS1236746,SRA329570,GEO,"Kenneth Poss lab, Department of Cell Biology, Duke University Medical Center",1,0.91744,,0.07298,,0.72847,,0.44383,,50,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,early_illumina,full_length,random_priming,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,United States,2016-01-05,Undetermined,Undetermined,Fin,Surface Structure 40340,SRR3086888,SRX1518387,SRS1236747,SRP068114,PRJNA307985,Transcription profiling of zebrafish fin regeneration,GSE76564,Transcriptome Analysis,We compared transcriptional profiles of regenerating zebrafish caudal fins following fin amputation with profiles from uninjured zebrafish caudal fins Overall design: Examination of whole fin transcriptional profiles from regenerating fins 2 pools of 10 fins and uninjured fins 2 pools of 10 fins,,pubmed:27049946,,ZF 4dpa Fin 2,GSM2028018,,tissue:Fins 4d post amputation|strain:EK|line:Wild type|treatment:Fin Amputation,ZF 4dpa Fin 2,"Base calling with Casava Alignment with TopHat Counts summarized with R using TopHat output Analysis performed with EdgeR package of Bioconductor Genome build: Zv9 Supplementary files format and content: ""Regenerate fin counts.txt"" and ""Uninjured fin Control counts.txt"" is a tab delimited text file containing summarized counts for each transcript. This was the dataset entered into edgeR.",Fins 4d post amputation,Fins were amputated to 50% of their original length using razor blades,Either uninjured fins or fins at 4 dy post amputation were collected. 10 fins were dissected rinsed in PBS placed in Trizol and homogenized. RNA was then extracted. Illumina RNA Seq 50 bp Single end libraries,,strain:EK|line:Wild type|treatment:Fin Amputation,GSM2028018,GSM2028018: ZF 4dpa Fin 2; Danio rerio; RNA Seq,GSM2028018,,1,Either uninjured fins or fins at 4 dy post amputation were collected. 10 fins were dissected rinsed in PBS placed in Trizol and homogenized. RNA was then extracted. Illumina RNA Seq 50 bp Single end libraries,GEO Accession:GSM2028018,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,cDNA,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,Illumina Genome Analyzer II,,SRP068114,,,Reg2-1.fastq.gz,fastq,800000000.0,16000000.0,GSM2028018 r1,0:50,A:208862526;C:192270727;G:188582591;T:210215639;N:68517,50,,,,208862526,192270727,188582591,210215639,68517,SRX1518387,SRS1236747,SRA329570,GEO,"Kenneth Poss lab, Department of Cell Biology, Duke University Medical Center",1,0.92514,,0.07091,,0.70638,,0.46239,,50,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,early_illumina,full_length,random_priming,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,United States,2016-01-05,Undetermined,Undetermined,Fin,Surface Structure 40341,SRR3086889,SRX1518387,SRS1236747,SRP068114,PRJNA307985,Transcription profiling of zebrafish fin regeneration,GSE76564,Transcriptome Analysis,We compared transcriptional profiles of regenerating zebrafish caudal fins following fin amputation with profiles from uninjured zebrafish caudal fins Overall design: Examination of whole fin transcriptional profiles from regenerating fins 2 pools of 10 fins and uninjured fins 2 pools of 10 fins,,pubmed:27049946,,ZF 4dpa Fin 2,GSM2028018,,tissue:Fins 4d post amputation|strain:EK|line:Wild type|treatment:Fin Amputation,ZF 4dpa Fin 2,"Base calling with Casava Alignment with TopHat Counts summarized with R using TopHat output Analysis performed with EdgeR package of Bioconductor Genome build: Zv9 Supplementary files format and content: ""Regenerate fin counts.txt"" and ""Uninjured fin Control counts.txt"" is a tab delimited text file containing summarized counts for each transcript. This was the dataset entered into edgeR.",Fins 4d post amputation,Fins were amputated to 50% of their original length using razor blades,Either uninjured fins or fins at 4 dy post amputation were collected. 10 fins were dissected rinsed in PBS placed in Trizol and homogenized. RNA was then extracted. Illumina RNA Seq 50 bp Single end libraries,,strain:EK|line:Wild type|treatment:Fin Amputation,GSM2028018,GSM2028018: ZF 4dpa Fin 2; Danio rerio; RNA Seq,GSM2028018,,1,Either uninjured fins or fins at 4 dy post amputation were collected. 10 fins were dissected rinsed in PBS placed in Trizol and homogenized. RNA was then extracted. Illumina RNA Seq 50 bp Single end libraries,GEO Accession:GSM2028018,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,cDNA,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,Illumina Genome Analyzer II,,SRP068114,,,Reg2-2.fastq.gz,fastq,800000000.0,16000000.0,GSM2028018 r2,0:50,A:208854177;C:192161932;G:188871135;T:210062448;N:50308,50,,,,208854177,192161932,188871135,210062448,50308,SRX1518387,SRS1236747,SRA329570,GEO,"Kenneth Poss lab, Department of Cell Biology, Duke University Medical Center",1,0.92252,,0.07056,,0.70694,,0.45392,,50,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,early_illumina,full_length,random_priming,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,United States,2016-01-05,Undetermined,Undetermined,Fin,Surface Structure 40342,SRR3086890,SRX1518387,SRS1236747,SRP068114,PRJNA307985,Transcription profiling of zebrafish fin regeneration,GSE76564,Transcriptome Analysis,We compared transcriptional profiles of regenerating zebrafish caudal fins following fin amputation with profiles from uninjured zebrafish caudal fins Overall design: Examination of whole fin transcriptional profiles from regenerating fins 2 pools of 10 fins and uninjured fins 2 pools of 10 fins,,pubmed:27049946,,ZF 4dpa Fin 2,GSM2028018,,tissue:Fins 4d post amputation|strain:EK|line:Wild type|treatment:Fin Amputation,ZF 4dpa Fin 2,"Base calling with Casava Alignment with TopHat Counts summarized with R using TopHat output Analysis performed with EdgeR package of Bioconductor Genome build: Zv9 Supplementary files format and content: ""Regenerate fin counts.txt"" and ""Uninjured fin Control counts.txt"" is a tab delimited text file containing summarized counts for each transcript. This was the dataset entered into edgeR.",Fins 4d post amputation,Fins were amputated to 50% of their original length using razor blades,Either uninjured fins or fins at 4 dy post amputation were collected. 10 fins were dissected rinsed in PBS placed in Trizol and homogenized. RNA was then extracted. Illumina RNA Seq 50 bp Single end libraries,,strain:EK|line:Wild type|treatment:Fin Amputation,GSM2028018,GSM2028018: ZF 4dpa Fin 2; Danio rerio; RNA Seq,GSM2028018,,1,Either uninjured fins or fins at 4 dy post amputation were collected. 10 fins were dissected rinsed in PBS placed in Trizol and homogenized. RNA was then extracted. Illumina RNA Seq 50 bp Single end libraries,GEO Accession:GSM2028018,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,cDNA,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,Illumina Genome Analyzer II,,SRP068114,,,Reg2-3.fastq.gz,fastq,800000000.0,16000000.0,GSM2028018 r3,0:50,A:208765699;C:191936198;G:189409194;T:209878960;N:9949,50,,,,208765699,191936198,189409194,209878960,9949,SRX1518387,SRS1236747,SRA329570,GEO,"Kenneth Poss lab, Department of Cell Biology, Duke University Medical Center",1,0.91451,,0.06995,,0.70741,,0.45822,,50,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,early_illumina,full_length,random_priming,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,United States,2016-01-05,Undetermined,Undetermined,Fin,Surface Structure 40343,SRR3086891,SRX1518387,SRS1236747,SRP068114,PRJNA307985,Transcription profiling of zebrafish fin regeneration,GSE76564,Transcriptome Analysis,We compared transcriptional profiles of regenerating zebrafish caudal fins following fin amputation with profiles from uninjured zebrafish caudal fins Overall design: Examination of whole fin transcriptional profiles from regenerating fins 2 pools of 10 fins and uninjured fins 2 pools of 10 fins,,pubmed:27049946,,ZF 4dpa Fin 2,GSM2028018,,tissue:Fins 4d post amputation|strain:EK|line:Wild type|treatment:Fin Amputation,ZF 4dpa Fin 2,"Base calling with Casava Alignment with TopHat Counts summarized with R using TopHat output Analysis performed with EdgeR package of Bioconductor Genome build: Zv9 Supplementary files format and content: ""Regenerate fin counts.txt"" and ""Uninjured fin Control counts.txt"" is a tab delimited text file containing summarized counts for each transcript. This was the dataset entered into edgeR.",Fins 4d post amputation,Fins were amputated to 50% of their original length using razor blades,Either uninjured fins or fins at 4 dy post amputation were collected. 10 fins were dissected rinsed in PBS placed in Trizol and homogenized. RNA was then extracted. Illumina RNA Seq 50 bp Single end libraries,,strain:EK|line:Wild type|treatment:Fin Amputation,GSM2028018,GSM2028018: ZF 4dpa Fin 2; Danio rerio; RNA Seq,GSM2028018,,1,Either uninjured fins or fins at 4 dy post amputation were collected. 10 fins were dissected rinsed in PBS placed in Trizol and homogenized. RNA was then extracted. Illumina RNA Seq 50 bp Single end libraries,GEO Accession:GSM2028018,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,cDNA,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,Illumina Genome Analyzer II,,SRP068114,,,Reg2-4.fastq.gz,fastq,123651950.0,2473039.0,GSM2028018 r4,0:50,A:32365652;C:29515195;G:29236871;T:32533508;N:724,50,,,,32365652,29515195,29236871,32533508,724,SRX1518387,SRS1236747,SRA329570,GEO,"Kenneth Poss lab, Department of Cell Biology, Duke University Medical Center",1,0.91437,,0.07079,,0.70867,,0.46558,,50,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,early_illumina,full_length,random_priming,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,United States,2016-01-05,Undetermined,Undetermined,Fin,Surface Structure 40344,SRR3086884,SRX1518386,SRS1236745,SRP068114,PRJNA307985,Transcription profiling of zebrafish fin regeneration,GSE76564,Transcriptome Analysis,We compared transcriptional profiles of regenerating zebrafish caudal fins following fin amputation with profiles from uninjured zebrafish caudal fins Overall design: Examination of whole fin transcriptional profiles from regenerating fins 2 pools of 10 fins and uninjured fins 2 pools of 10 fins,,pubmed:27049946,,ZF 4dpa Fin 1,GSM2028017,,tissue:Fins 4d post amputation|strain:EK|line:Wild type|treatment:Fin Amputation,ZF 4dpa Fin 1,"Base calling with Casava Alignment with TopHat Counts summarized with R using TopHat output Analysis performed with EdgeR package of Bioconductor Genome build: Zv9 Supplementary files format and content: ""Regenerate fin counts.txt"" and ""Uninjured fin Control counts.txt"" is a tab delimited text file containing summarized counts for each transcript. This was the dataset entered into edgeR.",Fins 4d post amputation,Fins were amputated to 50% of their original length using razor blades,Either uninjured fins or fins at 4 dy post amputation were collected. 10 fins were dissected rinsed in PBS placed in Trizol and homogenized. RNA was then extracted. Illumina RNA Seq 50 bp Single end libraries,,strain:EK|line:Wild type|treatment:Fin Amputation,GSM2028017,GSM2028017: ZF 4dpa Fin 1; Danio rerio; RNA Seq,GSM2028017,,1,Either uninjured fins or fins at 4 dy post amputation were collected. 10 fins were dissected rinsed in PBS placed in Trizol and homogenized. RNA was then extracted. Illumina RNA Seq 50 bp Single end libraries,GEO Accession:GSM2028017,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,cDNA,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,Illumina Genome Analyzer II,,SRP068114,,,Reg1-1.fastq.gz,fastq,800000000.0,16000000.0,GSM2028017 r1,0:50,A:207070768;C:193619920;G:189688453;T:209552804;N:68055,50,,,,207070768,193619920,189688453,209552804,68055,SRX1518386,SRS1236745,SRA329570,GEO,"Kenneth Poss lab, Department of Cell Biology, Duke University Medical Center",1,0.92944,,0.06242,,0.71224,,0.46274,,50,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,early_illumina,full_length,random_priming,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,United States,2016-01-05,Undetermined,Undetermined,Fin,Surface Structure 40345,SRR3086885,SRX1518386,SRS1236745,SRP068114,PRJNA307985,Transcription profiling of zebrafish fin regeneration,GSE76564,Transcriptome Analysis,We compared transcriptional profiles of regenerating zebrafish caudal fins following fin amputation with profiles from uninjured zebrafish caudal fins Overall design: Examination of whole fin transcriptional profiles from regenerating fins 2 pools of 10 fins and uninjured fins 2 pools of 10 fins,,pubmed:27049946,,ZF 4dpa Fin 1,GSM2028017,,tissue:Fins 4d post amputation|strain:EK|line:Wild type|treatment:Fin Amputation,ZF 4dpa Fin 1,"Base calling with Casava Alignment with TopHat Counts summarized with R using TopHat output Analysis performed with EdgeR package of Bioconductor Genome build: Zv9 Supplementary files format and content: ""Regenerate fin counts.txt"" and ""Uninjured fin Control counts.txt"" is a tab delimited text file containing summarized counts for each transcript. This was the dataset entered into edgeR.",Fins 4d post amputation,Fins were amputated to 50% of their original length using razor blades,Either uninjured fins or fins at 4 dy post amputation were collected. 10 fins were dissected rinsed in PBS placed in Trizol and homogenized. RNA was then extracted. Illumina RNA Seq 50 bp Single end libraries,,strain:EK|line:Wild type|treatment:Fin Amputation,GSM2028017,GSM2028017: ZF 4dpa Fin 1; Danio rerio; RNA Seq,GSM2028017,,1,Either uninjured fins or fins at 4 dy post amputation were collected. 10 fins were dissected rinsed in PBS placed in Trizol and homogenized. RNA was then extracted. Illumina RNA Seq 50 bp Single end libraries,GEO Accession:GSM2028017,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,cDNA,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,Illumina Genome Analyzer II,,SRP068114,,,Reg1-2.fastq.gz,fastq,800000000.0,16000000.0,GSM2028017 r2,0:50,A:207042635;C:193500947;G:190015843;T:209392450;N:48125,50,,,,207042635,193500947,190015843,209392450,48125,SRX1518386,SRS1236745,SRA329570,GEO,"Kenneth Poss lab, Department of Cell Biology, Duke University Medical Center",1,0.92402,,0.06138,,0.71295,,0.46332,,50,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,early_illumina,full_length,random_priming,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,United States,2016-01-05,Undetermined,Undetermined,Fin,Surface Structure 40346,SRR3086886,SRX1518386,SRS1236745,SRP068114,PRJNA307985,Transcription profiling of zebrafish fin regeneration,GSE76564,Transcriptome Analysis,We compared transcriptional profiles of regenerating zebrafish caudal fins following fin amputation with profiles from uninjured zebrafish caudal fins Overall design: Examination of whole fin transcriptional profiles from regenerating fins 2 pools of 10 fins and uninjured fins 2 pools of 10 fins,,pubmed:27049946,,ZF 4dpa Fin 1,GSM2028017,,tissue:Fins 4d post amputation|strain:EK|line:Wild type|treatment:Fin Amputation,ZF 4dpa Fin 1,"Base calling with Casava Alignment with TopHat Counts summarized with R using TopHat output Analysis performed with EdgeR package of Bioconductor Genome build: Zv9 Supplementary files format and content: ""Regenerate fin counts.txt"" and ""Uninjured fin Control counts.txt"" is a tab delimited text file containing summarized counts for each transcript. This was the dataset entered into edgeR.",Fins 4d post amputation,Fins were amputated to 50% of their original length using razor blades,Either uninjured fins or fins at 4 dy post amputation were collected. 10 fins were dissected rinsed in PBS placed in Trizol and homogenized. RNA was then extracted. Illumina RNA Seq 50 bp Single end libraries,,strain:EK|line:Wild type|treatment:Fin Amputation,GSM2028017,GSM2028017: ZF 4dpa Fin 1; Danio rerio; RNA Seq,GSM2028017,,1,Either uninjured fins or fins at 4 dy post amputation were collected. 10 fins were dissected rinsed in PBS placed in Trizol and homogenized. RNA was then extracted. Illumina RNA Seq 50 bp Single end libraries,GEO Accession:GSM2028017,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,cDNA,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,Illumina Genome Analyzer II,,SRP068114,,,Reg1-3.fastq.gz,fastq,800000000.0,16000000.0,GSM2028017 r3,0:50,A:206941368;C:193232860;G:190532195;T:209283728;N:9849,50,,,,206941368,193232860,190532195,209283728,9849,SRX1518386,SRS1236745,SRA329570,GEO,"Kenneth Poss lab, Department of Cell Biology, Duke University Medical Center",1,0.91924,,0.06196,,0.71275,,0.46184,,50,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,early_illumina,full_length,random_priming,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,United States,2016-01-05,Undetermined,Undetermined,Fin,Surface Structure 40347,SRR3086887,SRX1518386,SRS1236745,SRP068114,PRJNA307985,Transcription profiling of zebrafish fin regeneration,GSE76564,Transcriptome Analysis,We compared transcriptional profiles of regenerating zebrafish caudal fins following fin amputation with profiles from uninjured zebrafish caudal fins Overall design: Examination of whole fin transcriptional profiles from regenerating fins 2 pools of 10 fins and uninjured fins 2 pools of 10 fins,,pubmed:27049946,,ZF 4dpa Fin 1,GSM2028017,,tissue:Fins 4d post amputation|strain:EK|line:Wild type|treatment:Fin Amputation,ZF 4dpa Fin 1,"Base calling with Casava Alignment with TopHat Counts summarized with R using TopHat output Analysis performed with EdgeR package of Bioconductor Genome build: Zv9 Supplementary files format and content: ""Regenerate fin counts.txt"" and ""Uninjured fin Control counts.txt"" is a tab delimited text file containing summarized counts for each transcript. This was the dataset entered into edgeR.",Fins 4d post amputation,Fins were amputated to 50% of their original length using razor blades,Either uninjured fins or fins at 4 dy post amputation were collected. 10 fins were dissected rinsed in PBS placed in Trizol and homogenized. RNA was then extracted. Illumina RNA Seq 50 bp Single end libraries,,strain:EK|line:Wild type|treatment:Fin Amputation,GSM2028017,GSM2028017: ZF 4dpa Fin 1; Danio rerio; RNA Seq,GSM2028017,,1,Either uninjured fins or fins at 4 dy post amputation were collected. 10 fins were dissected rinsed in PBS placed in Trizol and homogenized. RNA was then extracted. Illumina RNA Seq 50 bp Single end libraries,GEO Accession:GSM2028017,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,cDNA,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,Illumina Genome Analyzer II,,SRP068114,,,Reg1-4.fastq.gz,fastq,90897750.0,1817955.0,GSM2028017 r4,0:50,A:23579811;C:21833091;G:21640955;T:23843357;N:536,50,,,,23579811,21833091,21640955,23843357,536,SRX1518386,SRS1236745,SRA329570,GEO,"Kenneth Poss lab, Department of Cell Biology, Duke University Medical Center",1,0.91241,,0.06085,,0.7152,,0.46013,,50,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,early_illumina,full_length,random_priming,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,United States,2016-01-05,Undetermined,Undetermined,Fin,Surface Structure 48021,SRR6915090,SRX3862779,SRS3104834,SRP136710,PRJNA447984,RNA seq data from adult zebrafish caudal fin regeneration,GSE112498,Transcriptome Analysis,Adult zebrafish are able to regenerate many organs such as their caudal fin in only few dy post amputation. To explore the landscape and dynamic of the genes involed in regeneration we performed a global transcriptomic analysis using RNA seq during zebrafish caudal fin regeneration. Overall design: RNAs were extracetd from a pool of 6 adult zebrafish caudal fins before amputation and at 2 3 and 10 dy post amputation. Experiment was performed in triplicates. The experimental design results in a total of 12 samples.,,pubmed:30031067,,10dpa replicate3,GSM3071386,,source name:caudal fin tissue 10 dy post amputation|tissue:caudal fin|strain:AB Tu|age:adults between 8 mpf and 18 mpf,10dpa replicate3,SOLiD Wildfire sequencer Thermo Fisher Scientific Mapping was performed in color space using the dedicated Lifescope pipeline and the whole.transcriptome.frag workflow Genome build: zv9 Supplementary files format and content: Data raw counts are provided as a table where each line corresponds to a gene and each column to a sample,caudal fin tissue 10 dy post amputation,Samples were collected on anesthetized fish and washed one time in water. Samples were then placed in the Macherey Nagel RNA XS kit ref. 740902 lysis buffer and stored at 80°C before RNA extraction.,RNAs were extracted using the Macherey Nagel RNA XS kit ref. 740902 and according to manufacturer's instructions exept that the carrier RNA was not used. Libraries were built using the SENSE mRNA Seq Library Prep Kit Lexogen dedicated for SOLiD sequencers. Librairies were then converted to 5500W system to be compatible with the SOLiD Wildfire sequencer.,Adult fish were raised at 28°C and fed 2 times a day. Fish were anesthetized for the first fin amputation and then at appropriate time points to take off samples.,tissue:caudal fin|strain:AB Tu|age:adults between 8 mpf and 18 mpf,GSM3071386,GSM3071386: 10dpa replicate3; Danio rerio; RNA Seq,GSM3071386,,1,RNAs were extracted using the Macherey Nagel RNA XS kit ref. 740902 and according to manufacturer's instructions exept that the carrier RNA was not used. Libraries were built using the SENSE mRNA Seq Library Prep Kit Lexogen dedicated for SOLiD sequencers. Librairies were then converted to 5500W system to be compatible with the SOLiD Wildfire sequencer.,GEO Accession:GSM3071386,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,cDNA,SINGLE,ABI_SOLID,AB 5500 Genetic Analyzer,,SRP136710,,options: accept hard clip,Solid5500_2014_11_07_1_L03-1-Idx_10-10.bam,bam,682375516.0,14088728.0,GSM3071386 r1,0:48.43,A:140419665;C:148759068;G:176799261;T:168695522;N:47702000,48,,,,140419665,148759068,176799261,168695522,47702000,SRX3862779,SRS3104834,SRA676352,GEO,"Matrix Biology and Pathology group, Institute of Functional Genomics of Lyon, CNRS - ENS of Lyon",1,0.76603,,0.04459,,0.79752,,0.50424,,50,,B,,usable mapping rate,legacy,early,full_length,random_priming,lexogen,bulk,unknown,unknown,,France,2018-03-29,Adult,Adult,Fin,Surface Structure 48022,SRR6915089,SRX3862778,SRS3104833,SRP136710,PRJNA447984,RNA seq data from adult zebrafish caudal fin regeneration,GSE112498,Transcriptome Analysis,Adult zebrafish are able to regenerate many organs such as their caudal fin in only few dy post amputation. To explore the landscape and dynamic of the genes involed in regeneration we performed a global transcriptomic analysis using RNA seq during zebrafish caudal fin regeneration. Overall design: RNAs were extracetd from a pool of 6 adult zebrafish caudal fins before amputation and at 2 3 and 10 dy post amputation. Experiment was performed in triplicates. The experimental design results in a total of 12 samples.,,pubmed:30031067,,3dpa replicate3,GSM3071385,,source name:caudal fin tissue 3 dy post amputation|tissue:caudal fin|strain:AB Tu|age:adults between 8 mpf and 18 mpf,3dpa replicate3,SOLiD Wildfire sequencer Thermo Fisher Scientific Mapping was performed in color space using the dedicated Lifescope pipeline and the whole.transcriptome.frag workflow Genome build: zv9 Supplementary files format and content: Data raw counts are provided as a table where each line corresponds to a gene and each column to a sample,caudal fin tissue 3 dy post amputation,Samples were collected on anesthetized fish and washed one time in water. Samples were then placed in the Macherey Nagel RNA XS kit ref. 740902 lysis buffer and stored at 80°C before RNA extraction.,RNAs were extracted using the Macherey Nagel RNA XS kit ref. 740902 and according to manufacturer's instructions exept that the carrier RNA was not used. Libraries were built using the SENSE mRNA Seq Library Prep Kit Lexogen dedicated for SOLiD sequencers. Librairies were then converted to 5500W system to be compatible with the SOLiD Wildfire sequencer.,Adult fish were raised at 28°C and fed 2 times a day. Fish were anesthetized for the first fin amputation and then at appropriate time points to take off samples.,tissue:caudal fin|strain:AB Tu|age:adults between 8 mpf and 18 mpf,GSM3071385,GSM3071385: 3dpa replicate3; Danio rerio; RNA Seq,GSM3071385,,1,RNAs were extracted using the Macherey Nagel RNA XS kit ref. 740902 and according to manufacturer's instructions exept that the carrier RNA was not used. Libraries were built using the SENSE mRNA Seq Library Prep Kit Lexogen dedicated for SOLiD sequencers. Librairies were then converted to 5500W system to be compatible with the SOLiD Wildfire sequencer.,GEO Accession:GSM3071385,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,cDNA,SINGLE,ABI_SOLID,AB 5500 Genetic Analyzer,,SRP136710,,options: accept hard clip,Solid5500_2014_11_07_1_L03-1-Idx_12-12.bam,bam,901887293.0,18522789.0,GSM3071385 r1,0:48.69,A:184300673;C:193849264;G:243428119;T:224471972;N:55837265,48,,,,184300673,193849264,243428119,224471972,55837265,SRX3862778,SRS3104833,SRA676352,GEO,"Matrix Biology and Pathology group, Institute of Functional Genomics of Lyon, CNRS - ENS of Lyon",1,0.78632,,0.03154,,0.79707,,0.51779,,50,,B,,usable mapping rate,legacy,early,full_length,random_priming,lexogen,bulk,unknown,unknown,,France,2018-03-29,Adult,Adult,Fin,Surface Structure 48023,SRR6915088,SRX3862777,SRS3104832,SRP136710,PRJNA447984,RNA seq data from adult zebrafish caudal fin regeneration,GSE112498,Transcriptome Analysis,Adult zebrafish are able to regenerate many organs such as their caudal fin in only few dy post amputation. To explore the landscape and dynamic of the genes involed in regeneration we performed a global transcriptomic analysis using RNA seq during zebrafish caudal fin regeneration. Overall design: RNAs were extracetd from a pool of 6 adult zebrafish caudal fins before amputation and at 2 3 and 10 dy post amputation. Experiment was performed in triplicates. The experimental design results in a total of 12 samples.,,pubmed:30031067,,2dpa replicate3,GSM3071384,,source name:caudal fin tissue 2 dy post amputation|tissue:caudal fin|strain:AB Tu|age:adults between 8 mpf and 18 mpf,2dpa replicate3,SOLiD Wildfire sequencer Thermo Fisher Scientific Mapping was performed in color space using the dedicated Lifescope pipeline and the whole.transcriptome.frag workflow Genome build: zv9 Supplementary files format and content: Data raw counts are provided as a table where each line corresponds to a gene and each column to a sample,caudal fin tissue 2 dy post amputation,Samples were collected on anesthetized fish and washed one time in water. Samples were then placed in the Macherey Nagel RNA XS kit ref. 740902 lysis buffer and stored at 80°C before RNA extraction.,RNAs were extracted using the Macherey Nagel RNA XS kit ref. 740902 and according to manufacturer's instructions exept that the carrier RNA was not used. Libraries were built using the SENSE mRNA Seq Library Prep Kit Lexogen dedicated for SOLiD sequencers. Librairies were then converted to 5500W system to be compatible with the SOLiD Wildfire sequencer.,Adult fish were raised at 28°C and fed 2 times a day. Fish were anesthetized for the first fin amputation and then at appropriate time points to take off samples.,tissue:caudal fin|strain:AB Tu|age:adults between 8 mpf and 18 mpf,GSM3071384,GSM3071384: 2dpa replicate3; Danio rerio; RNA Seq,GSM3071384,,1,RNAs were extracted using the Macherey Nagel RNA XS kit ref. 740902 and according to manufacturer's instructions exept that the carrier RNA was not used. Libraries were built using the SENSE mRNA Seq Library Prep Kit Lexogen dedicated for SOLiD sequencers. Librairies were then converted to 5500W system to be compatible with the SOLiD Wildfire sequencer.,GEO Accession:GSM3071384,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,cDNA,SINGLE,ABI_SOLID,AB 5500 Genetic Analyzer,,SRP136710,,options: accept hard clip,Solid5500_2014_11_07_1_L03-1-Idx_11-11.bam,bam,850810410.0,17462158.0,GSM3071384 r1,0:48.72,A:176186499;C:182052044;G:228063922;T:213571294;N:50936651,48,,,,176186499,182052044,228063922,213571294,50936651,SRX3862777,SRS3104832,SRA676352,GEO,"Matrix Biology and Pathology group, Institute of Functional Genomics of Lyon, CNRS - ENS of Lyon",1,0.77804,,0.03462,,0.80229,,0.49822,,43,,B,,usable mapping rate,legacy,early,full_length,random_priming,lexogen,bulk,unknown,unknown,,France,2018-03-29,Adult,Adult,Fin,Surface Structure 48024,SRR6915087,SRX3862776,SRS3104831,SRP136710,PRJNA447984,RNA seq data from adult zebrafish caudal fin regeneration,GSE112498,Transcriptome Analysis,Adult zebrafish are able to regenerate many organs such as their caudal fin in only few dy post amputation. To explore the landscape and dynamic of the genes involed in regeneration we performed a global transcriptomic analysis using RNA seq during zebrafish caudal fin regeneration. Overall design: RNAs were extracetd from a pool of 6 adult zebrafish caudal fins before amputation and at 2 3 and 10 dy post amputation. Experiment was performed in triplicates. The experimental design results in a total of 12 samples.,,pubmed:30031067,,0dpa replicate3,GSM3071383,,source name:caudal fin tissue 0 dy post amputation|tissue:caudal fin|strain:AB Tu|age:adults between 8 mpf and 18 mpf,0dpa replicate3,SOLiD Wildfire sequencer Thermo Fisher Scientific Mapping was performed in color space using the dedicated Lifescope pipeline and the whole.transcriptome.frag workflow Genome build: zv9 Supplementary files format and content: Data raw counts are provided as a table where each line corresponds to a gene and each column to a sample,caudal fin tissue 0 dy post amputation,Samples were collected on anesthetized fish and washed one time in water. Samples were then placed in the Macherey Nagel RNA XS kit ref. 740902 lysis buffer and stored at 80°C before RNA extraction.,RNAs were extracted using the Macherey Nagel RNA XS kit ref. 740902 and according to manufacturer's instructions exept that the carrier RNA was not used. Libraries were built using the SENSE mRNA Seq Library Prep Kit Lexogen dedicated for SOLiD sequencers. Librairies were then converted to 5500W system to be compatible with the SOLiD Wildfire sequencer.,Adult fish were raised at 28°C and fed 2 times a day. Fish were anesthetized for the first fin amputation and then at appropriate time points to take off samples.,tissue:caudal fin|strain:AB Tu|age:adults between 8 mpf and 18 mpf,GSM3071383,GSM3071383: 0dpa replicate3; Danio rerio; RNA Seq,GSM3071383,,1,RNAs were extracted using the Macherey Nagel RNA XS kit ref. 740902 and according to manufacturer's instructions exept that the carrier RNA was not used. Libraries were built using the SENSE mRNA Seq Library Prep Kit Lexogen dedicated for SOLiD sequencers. Librairies were then converted to 5500W system to be compatible with the SOLiD Wildfire sequencer.,GEO Accession:GSM3071383,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,cDNA,SINGLE,ABI_SOLID,AB 5500 Genetic Analyzer,,SRP136710,,options: accept hard clip,Solid5500_2014_11_07_1_L03-1-Idx_9-9.bam,bam,598710241.0,12328728.0,GSM3071383 r1,0:48.56,A:121889198;C:129444719;G:158430979;T:150128070;N:38817275,48,,,,121889198,129444719,158430979,150128070,38817275,SRX3862776,SRS3104831,SRA676352,GEO,"Matrix Biology and Pathology group, Institute of Functional Genomics of Lyon, CNRS - ENS of Lyon",1,0.77,,0.03334,,0.799,,0.45925,,50,,B,,usable mapping rate,legacy,early,full_length,random_priming,lexogen,bulk,unknown,unknown,,France,2018-03-29,Adult,Adult,Fin,Surface Structure 48025,SRR6915086,SRX3862775,SRS3104830,SRP136710,PRJNA447984,RNA seq data from adult zebrafish caudal fin regeneration,GSE112498,Transcriptome Analysis,Adult zebrafish are able to regenerate many organs such as their caudal fin in only few dy post amputation. To explore the landscape and dynamic of the genes involed in regeneration we performed a global transcriptomic analysis using RNA seq during zebrafish caudal fin regeneration. Overall design: RNAs were extracetd from a pool of 6 adult zebrafish caudal fins before amputation and at 2 3 and 10 dy post amputation. Experiment was performed in triplicates. The experimental design results in a total of 12 samples.,,pubmed:30031067,,10dpa replicate2,GSM3071382,,source name:caudal fin tissue 10 dy post amputation|tissue:caudal fin|strain:AB Tu|age:adults between 8 mpf and 18 mpf,10dpa replicate2,SOLiD Wildfire sequencer Thermo Fisher Scientific Mapping was performed in color space using the dedicated Lifescope pipeline and the whole.transcriptome.frag workflow Genome build: zv9 Supplementary files format and content: Data raw counts are provided as a table where each line corresponds to a gene and each column to a sample,caudal fin tissue 10 dy post amputation,Samples were collected on anesthetized fish and washed one time in water. Samples were then placed in the Macherey Nagel RNA XS kit ref. 740902 lysis buffer and stored at 80°C before RNA extraction.,RNAs were extracted using the Macherey Nagel RNA XS kit ref. 740902 and according to manufacturer's instructions exept that the carrier RNA was not used. Libraries were built using the SENSE mRNA Seq Library Prep Kit Lexogen dedicated for SOLiD sequencers. Librairies were then converted to 5500W system to be compatible with the SOLiD Wildfire sequencer.,Adult fish were raised at 28°C and fed 2 times a day. Fish were anesthetized for the first fin amputation and then at appropriate time points to take off samples.,tissue:caudal fin|strain:AB Tu|age:adults between 8 mpf and 18 mpf,GSM3071382,GSM3071382: 10dpa replicate2; Danio rerio; RNA Seq,GSM3071382,,1,RNAs were extracted using the Macherey Nagel RNA XS kit ref. 740902 and according to manufacturer's instructions exept that the carrier RNA was not used. Libraries were built using the SENSE mRNA Seq Library Prep Kit Lexogen dedicated for SOLiD sequencers. Librairies were then converted to 5500W system to be compatible with the SOLiD Wildfire sequencer.,GEO Accession:GSM3071382,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,cDNA,SINGLE,ABI_SOLID,AB 5500 Genetic Analyzer,,SRP136710,,options: accept hard clip,Solid5500_2014_11_07_1_L02-1-Idx_8-8.bam,bam,1205021238.0,24639106.0,GSM3071382 r1,0:48.91,A:255022070;C:275793907;G:309172527;T:294800027;N:70232707,48,,,,255022070,275793907,309172527,294800027,70232707,SRX3862775,SRS3104830,SRA676352,GEO,"Matrix Biology and Pathology group, Institute of Functional Genomics of Lyon, CNRS - ENS of Lyon",1,0.80398,,0.05829,,0.78644,,0.4993,,50,,B,,usable mapping rate,legacy,early,full_length,random_priming,lexogen,bulk,unknown,unknown,,France,2018-03-29,Adult,Adult,Fin,Surface Structure 48026,SRR6915085,SRX3862774,SRS3104829,SRP136710,PRJNA447984,RNA seq data from adult zebrafish caudal fin regeneration,GSE112498,Transcriptome Analysis,Adult zebrafish are able to regenerate many organs such as their caudal fin in only few dy post amputation. To explore the landscape and dynamic of the genes involed in regeneration we performed a global transcriptomic analysis using RNA seq during zebrafish caudal fin regeneration. Overall design: RNAs were extracetd from a pool of 6 adult zebrafish caudal fins before amputation and at 2 3 and 10 dy post amputation. Experiment was performed in triplicates. The experimental design results in a total of 12 samples.,,pubmed:30031067,,3dpa replicate2,GSM3071381,,source name:caudal fin tissue 3 dy post amputation|tissue:caudal fin|strain:AB Tu|age:adults between 8 mpf and 18 mpf,3dpa replicate2,SOLiD Wildfire sequencer Thermo Fisher Scientific Mapping was performed in color space using the dedicated Lifescope pipeline and the whole.transcriptome.frag workflow Genome build: zv9 Supplementary files format and content: Data raw counts are provided as a table where each line corresponds to a gene and each column to a sample,caudal fin tissue 3 dy post amputation,Samples were collected on anesthetized fish and washed one time in water. Samples were then placed in the Macherey Nagel RNA XS kit ref. 740902 lysis buffer and stored at 80°C before RNA extraction.,RNAs were extracted using the Macherey Nagel RNA XS kit ref. 740902 and according to manufacturer's instructions exept that the carrier RNA was not used. Libraries were built using the SENSE mRNA Seq Library Prep Kit Lexogen dedicated for SOLiD sequencers. Librairies were then converted to 5500W system to be compatible with the SOLiD Wildfire sequencer.,Adult fish were raised at 28°C and fed 2 times a day. Fish were anesthetized for the first fin amputation and then at appropriate time points to take off samples.,tissue:caudal fin|strain:AB Tu|age:adults between 8 mpf and 18 mpf,GSM3071381,GSM3071381: 3dpa replicate2; Danio rerio; RNA Seq,GSM3071381,,1,RNAs were extracted using the Macherey Nagel RNA XS kit ref. 740902 and according to manufacturer's instructions exept that the carrier RNA was not used. Libraries were built using the SENSE mRNA Seq Library Prep Kit Lexogen dedicated for SOLiD sequencers. Librairies were then converted to 5500W system to be compatible with the SOLiD Wildfire sequencer.,GEO Accession:GSM3071381,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,cDNA,SINGLE,ABI_SOLID,AB 5500 Genetic Analyzer,,SRP136710,,options: accept hard clip,Solid5500_2014_11_07_1_L02-1-Idx_10-10.bam,bam,1479531813.0,30219937.0,GSM3071381 r1,0:48.96,A:314793261;C:331769330;G:384109921;T:369987947;N:78871354,48,,,,314793261,331769330,384109921,369987947,78871354,SRX3862774,SRS3104829,SRA676352,GEO,"Matrix Biology and Pathology group, Institute of Functional Genomics of Lyon, CNRS - ENS of Lyon",1,0.81777,,0.03195,,0.7821,,0.49263,,50,,B,,usable mapping rate,legacy,early,full_length,random_priming,lexogen,bulk,unknown,unknown,,France,2018-03-29,Adult,Adult,Fin,Surface Structure 48027,SRR6915084,SRX3862773,SRS3104828,SRP136710,PRJNA447984,RNA seq data from adult zebrafish caudal fin regeneration,GSE112498,Transcriptome Analysis,Adult zebrafish are able to regenerate many organs such as their caudal fin in only few dy post amputation. To explore the landscape and dynamic of the genes involed in regeneration we performed a global transcriptomic analysis using RNA seq during zebrafish caudal fin regeneration. Overall design: RNAs were extracetd from a pool of 6 adult zebrafish caudal fins before amputation and at 2 3 and 10 dy post amputation. Experiment was performed in triplicates. The experimental design results in a total of 12 samples.,,pubmed:30031067,,2dpa replicate2,GSM3071380,,source name:caudal fin tissue 2 dy post amputation|tissue:caudal fin|strain:AB Tu|age:adults between 8 mpf and 18 mpf,2dpa replicate2,SOLiD Wildfire sequencer Thermo Fisher Scientific Mapping was performed in color space using the dedicated Lifescope pipeline and the whole.transcriptome.frag workflow Genome build: zv9 Supplementary files format and content: Data raw counts are provided as a table where each line corresponds to a gene and each column to a sample,caudal fin tissue 2 dy post amputation,Samples were collected on anesthetized fish and washed one time in water. Samples were then placed in the Macherey Nagel RNA XS kit ref. 740902 lysis buffer and stored at 80°C before RNA extraction.,RNAs were extracted using the Macherey Nagel RNA XS kit ref. 740902 and according to manufacturer's instructions exept that the carrier RNA was not used. Libraries were built using the SENSE mRNA Seq Library Prep Kit Lexogen dedicated for SOLiD sequencers. Librairies were then converted to 5500W system to be compatible with the SOLiD Wildfire sequencer.,Adult fish were raised at 28°C and fed 2 times a day. Fish were anesthetized for the first fin amputation and then at appropriate time points to take off samples.,tissue:caudal fin|strain:AB Tu|age:adults between 8 mpf and 18 mpf,GSM3071380,GSM3071380: 2dpa replicate2; Danio rerio; RNA Seq,GSM3071380,,1,RNAs were extracted using the Macherey Nagel RNA XS kit ref. 740902 and according to manufacturer's instructions exept that the carrier RNA was not used. Libraries were built using the SENSE mRNA Seq Library Prep Kit Lexogen dedicated for SOLiD sequencers. Librairies were then converted to 5500W system to be compatible with the SOLiD Wildfire sequencer.,GEO Accession:GSM3071380,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,cDNA,SINGLE,ABI_SOLID,AB 5500 Genetic Analyzer,,SRP136710,,options: accept hard clip,Solid5500_2014_11_07_1_L02-1-Idx_9-9.bam,bam,834856811.0,17079585.0,GSM3071380 r1,0:48.88,A:179851654;C:186667201;G:209784080;T:212166083;N:46387793,48,,,,179851654,186667201,209784080,212166083,46387793,SRX3862773,SRS3104828,SRA676352,GEO,"Matrix Biology and Pathology group, Institute of Functional Genomics of Lyon, CNRS - ENS of Lyon",1,0.80341,,0.02786,,0.78031,,0.49876,,50,,B,,usable mapping rate,legacy,early,full_length,random_priming,lexogen,bulk,unknown,unknown,,France,2018-03-29,Adult,Adult,Fin,Surface Structure 48028,SRR6915083,SRX3862772,SRS3104827,SRP136710,PRJNA447984,RNA seq data from adult zebrafish caudal fin regeneration,GSE112498,Transcriptome Analysis,Adult zebrafish are able to regenerate many organs such as their caudal fin in only few dy post amputation. To explore the landscape and dynamic of the genes involed in regeneration we performed a global transcriptomic analysis using RNA seq during zebrafish caudal fin regeneration. Overall design: RNAs were extracetd from a pool of 6 adult zebrafish caudal fins before amputation and at 2 3 and 10 dy post amputation. Experiment was performed in triplicates. The experimental design results in a total of 12 samples.,,pubmed:30031067,,0dpa replicate2,GSM3071379,,source name:caudal fin tissue 0 dy post amputation|tissue:caudal fin|strain:AB Tu|age:adults between 8 mpf and 18 mpf,0dpa replicate2,SOLiD Wildfire sequencer Thermo Fisher Scientific Mapping was performed in color space using the dedicated Lifescope pipeline and the whole.transcriptome.frag workflow Genome build: zv9 Supplementary files format and content: Data raw counts are provided as a table where each line corresponds to a gene and each column to a sample,caudal fin tissue 0 dy post amputation,Samples were collected on anesthetized fish and washed one time in water. Samples were then placed in the Macherey Nagel RNA XS kit ref. 740902 lysis buffer and stored at 80°C before RNA extraction.,RNAs were extracted using the Macherey Nagel RNA XS kit ref. 740902 and according to manufacturer's instructions exept that the carrier RNA was not used. Libraries were built using the SENSE mRNA Seq Library Prep Kit Lexogen dedicated for SOLiD sequencers. Librairies were then converted to 5500W system to be compatible with the SOLiD Wildfire sequencer.,Adult fish were raised at 28°C and fed 2 times a day. Fish were anesthetized for the first fin amputation and then at appropriate time points to take off samples.,tissue:caudal fin|strain:AB Tu|age:adults between 8 mpf and 18 mpf,GSM3071379,GSM3071379: 0dpa replicate2; Danio rerio; RNA Seq,GSM3071379,,1,RNAs were extracted using the Macherey Nagel RNA XS kit ref. 740902 and according to manufacturer's instructions exept that the carrier RNA was not used. Libraries were built using the SENSE mRNA Seq Library Prep Kit Lexogen dedicated for SOLiD sequencers. Librairies were then converted to 5500W system to be compatible with the SOLiD Wildfire sequencer.,GEO Accession:GSM3071379,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,cDNA,SINGLE,ABI_SOLID,AB 5500 Genetic Analyzer,,SRP136710,,options: accept hard clip,Solid5500_2014_11_07_1_L02-1-Idx_7-7.bam,bam,821645371.0,16824250.0,GSM3071379 r1,0:48.84,A:169383232;C:176200663;G:223364159;T:207905438;N:44791879,48,,,,169383232,176200663,223364159,207905438,44791879,SRX3862772,SRS3104827,SRA676352,GEO,"Matrix Biology and Pathology group, Institute of Functional Genomics of Lyon, CNRS - ENS of Lyon",1,0.79697,,0.04152,,0.79513,,0.48078,,34,,B,,usable mapping rate,legacy,early,full_length,random_priming,lexogen,bulk,unknown,unknown,,France,2018-03-29,Adult,Adult,Fin,Surface Structure 48029,SRR6915082,SRX3862771,SRS3104826,SRP136710,PRJNA447984,RNA seq data from adult zebrafish caudal fin regeneration,GSE112498,Transcriptome Analysis,Adult zebrafish are able to regenerate many organs such as their caudal fin in only few dy post amputation. To explore the landscape and dynamic of the genes involed in regeneration we performed a global transcriptomic analysis using RNA seq during zebrafish caudal fin regeneration. Overall design: RNAs were extracetd from a pool of 6 adult zebrafish caudal fins before amputation and at 2 3 and 10 dy post amputation. Experiment was performed in triplicates. The experimental design results in a total of 12 samples.,,pubmed:30031067,,10dpa replicate1,GSM3071378,,source name:caudal fin tissue 10 dy post amputation|tissue:caudal fin|strain:AB Tu|age:adults between 8 mpf and 18 mpf,10dpa replicate1,SOLiD Wildfire sequencer Thermo Fisher Scientific Mapping was performed in color space using the dedicated Lifescope pipeline and the whole.transcriptome.frag workflow Genome build: zv9 Supplementary files format and content: Data raw counts are provided as a table where each line corresponds to a gene and each column to a sample,caudal fin tissue 10 dy post amputation,Samples were collected on anesthetized fish and washed one time in water. Samples were then placed in the Macherey Nagel RNA XS kit ref. 740902 lysis buffer and stored at 80°C before RNA extraction.,RNAs were extracted using the Macherey Nagel RNA XS kit ref. 740902 and according to manufacturer's instructions exept that the carrier RNA was not used. Libraries were built using the SENSE mRNA Seq Library Prep Kit Lexogen dedicated for SOLiD sequencers. Librairies were then converted to 5500W system to be compatible with the SOLiD Wildfire sequencer.,Adult fish were raised at 28°C and fed 2 times a day. Fish were anesthetized for the first fin amputation and then at appropriate time points to take off samples.,tissue:caudal fin|strain:AB Tu|age:adults between 8 mpf and 18 mpf,GSM3071378,GSM3071378: 10dpa replicate1; Danio rerio; RNA Seq,GSM3071378,,1,RNAs were extracted using the Macherey Nagel RNA XS kit ref. 740902 and according to manufacturer's instructions exept that the carrier RNA was not used. Libraries were built using the SENSE mRNA Seq Library Prep Kit Lexogen dedicated for SOLiD sequencers. Librairies were then converted to 5500W system to be compatible with the SOLiD Wildfire sequencer.,GEO Accession:GSM3071378,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,cDNA,SINGLE,ABI_SOLID,AB 5500 Genetic Analyzer,,SRP136710,,options: accept hard clip,Solid5500_2014_11_07_1_L01-1-Idx_4-4.bam,bam,1056921416.0,21553661.0,GSM3071378 r1,0:49.04,A:223138065;C:233998717;G:286278215;T:261736901;N:51769518,49,,,,223138065,233998717,286278215,261736901,51769518,SRX3862771,SRS3104826,SRA676352,GEO,"Matrix Biology and Pathology group, Institute of Functional Genomics of Lyon, CNRS - ENS of Lyon",1,0.81372,,0.06015,,0.79017,,0.49818,,50,,B,,usable mapping rate,legacy,early,full_length,random_priming,lexogen,bulk,unknown,unknown,,France,2018-03-29,Adult,Adult,Fin,Surface Structure 48030,SRR6915081,SRX3862770,SRS3104824,SRP136710,PRJNA447984,RNA seq data from adult zebrafish caudal fin regeneration,GSE112498,Transcriptome Analysis,Adult zebrafish are able to regenerate many organs such as their caudal fin in only few dy post amputation. To explore the landscape and dynamic of the genes involed in regeneration we performed a global transcriptomic analysis using RNA seq during zebrafish caudal fin regeneration. Overall design: RNAs were extracetd from a pool of 6 adult zebrafish caudal fins before amputation and at 2 3 and 10 dy post amputation. Experiment was performed in triplicates. The experimental design results in a total of 12 samples.,,pubmed:30031067,,3dpa replicate1,GSM3071377,,source name:caudal fin tissue 3 dy post amputation|tissue:caudal fin|strain:AB Tu|age:adults between 8 mpf and 18 mpf,3dpa replicate1,SOLiD Wildfire sequencer Thermo Fisher Scientific Mapping was performed in color space using the dedicated Lifescope pipeline and the whole.transcriptome.frag workflow Genome build: zv9 Supplementary files format and content: Data raw counts are provided as a table where each line corresponds to a gene and each column to a sample,caudal fin tissue 3 dy post amputation,Samples were collected on anesthetized fish and washed one time in water. Samples were then placed in the Macherey Nagel RNA XS kit ref. 740902 lysis buffer and stored at 80°C before RNA extraction.,RNAs were extracted using the Macherey Nagel RNA XS kit ref. 740902 and according to manufacturer's instructions exept that the carrier RNA was not used. Libraries were built using the SENSE mRNA Seq Library Prep Kit Lexogen dedicated for SOLiD sequencers. Librairies were then converted to 5500W system to be compatible with the SOLiD Wildfire sequencer.,Adult fish were raised at 28°C and fed 2 times a day. Fish were anesthetized for the first fin amputation and then at appropriate time points to take off samples.,tissue:caudal fin|strain:AB Tu|age:adults between 8 mpf and 18 mpf,GSM3071377,GSM3071377: 3dpa replicate1; Danio rerio; RNA Seq,GSM3071377,,1,RNAs were extracted using the Macherey Nagel RNA XS kit ref. 740902 and according to manufacturer's instructions exept that the carrier RNA was not used. Libraries were built using the SENSE mRNA Seq Library Prep Kit Lexogen dedicated for SOLiD sequencers. Librairies were then converted to 5500W system to be compatible with the SOLiD Wildfire sequencer.,GEO Accession:GSM3071377,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,cDNA,SINGLE,ABI_SOLID,AB 5500 Genetic Analyzer,,SRP136710,,options: accept hard clip,Solid5500_2014_11_07_1_L01-1-Idx_6-6.bam,bam,614372216.0,12531168.0,GSM3071377 r1,0:49.03,A:129828689;C:133826356;G:168985348;T:153858339;N:27873484,49,,,,129828689,133826356,168985348,153858339,27873484,SRX3862770,SRS3104824,SRA676352,GEO,"Matrix Biology and Pathology group, Institute of Functional Genomics of Lyon, CNRS - ENS of Lyon",1,0.81659,,0.02803,,0.78987,,0.49295,,50,,B,,usable mapping rate,legacy,early,full_length,random_priming,lexogen,bulk,unknown,unknown,,France,2018-03-29,Adult,Adult,Fin,Surface Structure 48031,SRR6915080,SRX3862769,SRS3104825,SRP136710,PRJNA447984,RNA seq data from adult zebrafish caudal fin regeneration,GSE112498,Transcriptome Analysis,Adult zebrafish are able to regenerate many organs such as their caudal fin in only few dy post amputation. To explore the landscape and dynamic of the genes involed in regeneration we performed a global transcriptomic analysis using RNA seq during zebrafish caudal fin regeneration. Overall design: RNAs were extracetd from a pool of 6 adult zebrafish caudal fins before amputation and at 2 3 and 10 dy post amputation. Experiment was performed in triplicates. The experimental design results in a total of 12 samples.,,pubmed:30031067,,2dpa replicate1,GSM3071376,,source name:caudal fin tissue 2 dy post amputation|tissue:caudal fin|strain:AB Tu|age:adults between 8 mpf and 18 mpf,2dpa replicate1,SOLiD Wildfire sequencer Thermo Fisher Scientific Mapping was performed in color space using the dedicated Lifescope pipeline and the whole.transcriptome.frag workflow Genome build: zv9 Supplementary files format and content: Data raw counts are provided as a table where each line corresponds to a gene and each column to a sample,caudal fin tissue 2 dy post amputation,Samples were collected on anesthetized fish and washed one time in water. Samples were then placed in the Macherey Nagel RNA XS kit ref. 740902 lysis buffer and stored at 80°C before RNA extraction.,RNAs were extracted using the Macherey Nagel RNA XS kit ref. 740902 and according to manufacturer's instructions exept that the carrier RNA was not used. Libraries were built using the SENSE mRNA Seq Library Prep Kit Lexogen dedicated for SOLiD sequencers. Librairies were then converted to 5500W system to be compatible with the SOLiD Wildfire sequencer.,Adult fish were raised at 28°C and fed 2 times a day. Fish were anesthetized for the first fin amputation and then at appropriate time points to take off samples.,tissue:caudal fin|strain:AB Tu|age:adults between 8 mpf and 18 mpf,GSM3071376,GSM3071376: 2dpa replicate1; Danio rerio; RNA Seq,GSM3071376,,1,RNAs were extracted using the Macherey Nagel RNA XS kit ref. 740902 and according to manufacturer's instructions exept that the carrier RNA was not used. Libraries were built using the SENSE mRNA Seq Library Prep Kit Lexogen dedicated for SOLiD sequencers. Librairies were then converted to 5500W system to be compatible with the SOLiD Wildfire sequencer.,GEO Accession:GSM3071376,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,cDNA,SINGLE,ABI_SOLID,AB 5500 Genetic Analyzer,,SRP136710,,options: accept hard clip,Solid5500_2014_11_07_1_L01-1-Idx_5-5.bam,bam,1317408760.0,26870813.0,GSM3071376 r1,0:49.03,A:278980295;C:285236037;G:357022664;T:334390621;N:61779143,49,,,,278980295,285236037,357022664,334390621,61779143,SRX3862769,SRS3104825,SRA676352,GEO,"Matrix Biology and Pathology group, Institute of Functional Genomics of Lyon, CNRS - ENS of Lyon",1,0.81546,,0.02559,,0.79328,,0.48857,,50,,B,,usable mapping rate,legacy,early,full_length,random_priming,lexogen,bulk,unknown,unknown,,France,2018-03-29,Adult,Adult,Fin,Surface Structure 48032,SRR6915079,SRX3862768,SRS3104823,SRP136710,PRJNA447984,RNA seq data from adult zebrafish caudal fin regeneration,GSE112498,Transcriptome Analysis,Adult zebrafish are able to regenerate many organs such as their caudal fin in only few dy post amputation. To explore the landscape and dynamic of the genes involed in regeneration we performed a global transcriptomic analysis using RNA seq during zebrafish caudal fin regeneration. Overall design: RNAs were extracetd from a pool of 6 adult zebrafish caudal fins before amputation and at 2 3 and 10 dy post amputation. Experiment was performed in triplicates. The experimental design results in a total of 12 samples.,,pubmed:30031067,,0dpa replicate1,GSM3071375,,source name:caudal fin tissue 0 dy post amputation|tissue:caudal fin|strain:AB Tu|age:adults between 8 mpf and 18 mpf,0dpa replicate1,SOLiD Wildfire sequencer Thermo Fisher Scientific Mapping was performed in color space using the dedicated Lifescope pipeline and the whole.transcriptome.frag workflow Genome build: zv9 Supplementary files format and content: Data raw counts are provided as a table where each line corresponds to a gene and each column to a sample,caudal fin tissue 0 dy post amputation,Samples were collected on anesthetized fish and washed one time in water. Samples were then placed in the Macherey Nagel RNA XS kit ref. 740902 lysis buffer and stored at 80°C before RNA extraction.,RNAs were extracted using the Macherey Nagel RNA XS kit ref. 740902 and according to manufacturer's instructions exept that the carrier RNA was not used. Libraries were built using the SENSE mRNA Seq Library Prep Kit Lexogen dedicated for SOLiD sequencers. Librairies were then converted to 5500W system to be compatible with the SOLiD Wildfire sequencer.,Adult fish were raised at 28°C and fed 2 times a day. Fish were anesthetized for the first fin amputation and then at appropriate time points to take off samples.,tissue:caudal fin|strain:AB Tu|age:adults between 8 mpf and 18 mpf,GSM3071375,GSM3071375: 0dpa replicate1; Danio rerio; RNA Seq,GSM3071375,,1,RNAs were extracted using the Macherey Nagel RNA XS kit ref. 740902 and according to manufacturer's instructions exept that the carrier RNA was not used. Libraries were built using the SENSE mRNA Seq Library Prep Kit Lexogen dedicated for SOLiD sequencers. Librairies were then converted to 5500W system to be compatible with the SOLiD Wildfire sequencer.,GEO Accession:GSM3071375,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,cDNA,SINGLE,ABI_SOLID,AB 5500 Genetic Analyzer,,SRP136710,,options: accept hard clip,Solid5500_2014_11_07_1_L01-1-Idx_3-3.bam,bam,975324708.0,19881338.0,GSM3071375 r1,0:49.06,A:203549346;C:215407985;G:265949502;T:244027187;N:46390688,49,,,,203549346,215407985,265949502,244027187,46390688,SRX3862768,SRS3104823,SRA676352,GEO,"Matrix Biology and Pathology group, Institute of Functional Genomics of Lyon, CNRS - ENS of Lyon",1,0.80817,,0.05047,,0.79569,,0.47149,,50,,B,,usable mapping rate,legacy,early,full_length,random_priming,lexogen,bulk,unknown,unknown,,France,2018-03-29,Adult,Adult,Fin,Surface Structure 51072,SRR8503426,SRX5307303,SRS4304843,SRP182846,PRJNA517717,Transpositional scaling and niche transitions restore organ size and shape during zebrafish fin regeneration,GSE125859,Transcriptome Analysis,"Regenerating zebrafish fins have distal progenitor and proximal re differentiation zones. A Wnt producing ""niche"" population maintains distal cells in progenitor states. We sought to define molecular markers of niche cells to study their origins and fates and how they contribute to fin size and shape restoration. Overall design: We used RNA Seq to compare gene expression between three replicates of microdissected distal vs. proximal regenerating fin tissue as distinguished by distal shha:gfp expression. Each replicate consisted of pooled tissue from four caudal fins.",,,,prox 4,GSM3583370,,source name:96 hpa proximal regenerate|transgene:shha:eGFP|tissue:regenerating caudal fin|time:96 hours post amputation,prox 4,Basecalling by Illumina Real Time Analysis 2 RTA2. Sequence reads were mapped to GRCz11/danRer11 using TopHat2 Mapped reads were counted using HTSeq Genome build: GRCz11/danRer11 Supplementary files format and content: Tab delimited text files of HTSeq counts for each sample are provided,96 hpa proximal regenerate,,Tissue was collected and immediately placed in TRIzol reagent and homogenized. RNA was isolated using manufacturer's instruction. Libraries were prepared from 1ug of isolated RNA using Kapa stranded mRNA Seq kit and protocol.,,transgene:shha:eGFP|tissue:regenerating caudal fin|time:96 hours post amputation,GSM3583370,GSM3583370: prox 4; Danio rerio; RNA Seq,GSM3583370,,1,Tissue was collected and immediately placed in TRIzol reagent and homogenized. RNA was isolated using manufacturer's instruction. Libraries were prepared from 1ug of isolated RNA using Kapa stranded mRNA Seq kit and protocol.,GEO Accession:GSM3583370,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,cDNA,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,NextSeq 500,,SRP182846,,,P_H4_S10_R1_001.fastq,fastq,2542575470.0,30622171.0,GSM3583370 r1,0:83.03 1:0,A:589076767;C:639351667;G:597170951;T:716352530;N:623555,83,0,,,589076767,639351667,597170951,716352530,623555,SRX5307303,SRS4304843,SRA841050,GEO,"Stankunas, Biology- Institute of Molecular Biology, University of Oregon",1,0.96003,,0.11536,,0.73184,,0.50861,,82,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,nextseq,unknown,cdna_unspecified,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,United States,2019-01-29,Undetermined,Undetermined,Fin,Surface Structure 51073,SRR8503425,SRX5307302,SRS4304842,SRP182846,PRJNA517717,Transpositional scaling and niche transitions restore organ size and shape during zebrafish fin regeneration,GSE125859,Transcriptome Analysis,"Regenerating zebrafish fins have distal progenitor and proximal re differentiation zones. A Wnt producing ""niche"" population maintains distal cells in progenitor states. We sought to define molecular markers of niche cells to study their origins and fates and how they contribute to fin size and shape restoration. Overall design: We used RNA Seq to compare gene expression between three replicates of microdissected distal vs. proximal regenerating fin tissue as distinguished by distal shha:gfp expression. Each replicate consisted of pooled tissue from four caudal fins.",,,,prox 3,GSM3583369,,source name:96 hpa proximal regenerate|transgene:shha:eGFP|tissue:regenerating caudal fin|time:96 hours post amputation,prox 3,Basecalling by Illumina Real Time Analysis 2 RTA2. Sequence reads were mapped to GRCz11/danRer11 using TopHat2 Mapped reads were counted using HTSeq Genome build: GRCz11/danRer11 Supplementary files format and content: Tab delimited text files of HTSeq counts for each sample are provided,96 hpa proximal regenerate,,Tissue was collected and immediately placed in TRIzol reagent and homogenized. RNA was isolated using manufacturer's instruction. Libraries were prepared from 1ug of isolated RNA using Kapa stranded mRNA Seq kit and protocol.,,transgene:shha:eGFP|tissue:regenerating caudal fin|time:96 hours post amputation,GSM3583369,GSM3583369: prox 3; Danio rerio; RNA Seq,GSM3583369,,1,Tissue was collected and immediately placed in TRIzol reagent and homogenized. RNA was isolated using manufacturer's instruction. Libraries were prepared from 1ug of isolated RNA using Kapa stranded mRNA Seq kit and protocol.,GEO Accession:GSM3583369,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,cDNA,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,NextSeq 500,,SRP182846,,,P_H3_S6_R1_001.fastq,fastq,2572355378.0,30989968.0,GSM3583369 r1,0:83.01 1:0,A:628074006;C:625169881;G:585755261;T:732650748;N:705482,83,0,,,628074006,625169881,585755261,732650748,705482,SRX5307302,SRS4304842,SRA841050,GEO,"Stankunas, Biology- Institute of Molecular Biology, University of Oregon",1,0.95739,,0.12653,,0.72066,,0.49327,,84,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,nextseq,unknown,cdna_unspecified,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,United States,2019-01-29,Undetermined,Undetermined,Fin,Surface Structure 51074,SRR8503424,SRX5307301,SRS4304841,SRP182846,PRJNA517717,Transpositional scaling and niche transitions restore organ size and shape during zebrafish fin regeneration,GSE125859,Transcriptome Analysis,"Regenerating zebrafish fins have distal progenitor and proximal re differentiation zones. A Wnt producing ""niche"" population maintains distal cells in progenitor states. We sought to define molecular markers of niche cells to study their origins and fates and how they contribute to fin size and shape restoration. Overall design: We used RNA Seq to compare gene expression between three replicates of microdissected distal vs. proximal regenerating fin tissue as distinguished by distal shha:gfp expression. Each replicate consisted of pooled tissue from four caudal fins.",,,,prox 2,GSM3583368,,source name:96 hpa proximal regenerate|transgene:shha:eGFP|tissue:regenerating caudal fin|time:96 hours post amputation,prox 2,Basecalling by Illumina Real Time Analysis 2 RTA2. Sequence reads were mapped to GRCz11/danRer11 using TopHat2 Mapped reads were counted using HTSeq Genome build: GRCz11/danRer11 Supplementary files format and content: Tab delimited text files of HTSeq counts for each sample are provided,96 hpa proximal regenerate,,Tissue was collected and immediately placed in TRIzol reagent and homogenized. RNA was isolated using manufacturer's instruction. Libraries were prepared from 1ug of isolated RNA using Kapa stranded mRNA Seq kit and protocol.,,transgene:shha:eGFP|tissue:regenerating caudal fin|time:96 hours post amputation,GSM3583368,GSM3583368: prox 2; Danio rerio; RNA Seq,GSM3583368,,1,Tissue was collected and immediately placed in TRIzol reagent and homogenized. RNA was isolated using manufacturer's instruction. Libraries were prepared from 1ug of isolated RNA using Kapa stranded mRNA Seq kit and protocol.,GEO Accession:GSM3583368,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,cDNA,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,NextSeq 500,,SRP182846,,,P_H2_S2_R1_001.fastq,fastq,2715018138.0,32683271.0,GSM3583368 r1,0:83.07 1:0,A:650816207;C:672048834;G:625641446;T:765832919;N:678732,83,0,,,650816207,672048834,625641446,765832919,678732,SRX5307301,SRS4304841,SRA841050,GEO,"Stankunas, Biology- Institute of Molecular Biology, University of Oregon",1,0.96137,,0.11136,,0.72299,,0.49133,,84,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,nextseq,unknown,cdna_unspecified,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,United States,2019-01-29,Undetermined,Undetermined,Fin,Surface Structure 51075,SRR8503423,SRX5307300,SRS4304840,SRP182846,PRJNA517717,Transpositional scaling and niche transitions restore organ size and shape during zebrafish fin regeneration,GSE125859,Transcriptome Analysis,"Regenerating zebrafish fins have distal progenitor and proximal re differentiation zones. A Wnt producing ""niche"" population maintains distal cells in progenitor states. We sought to define molecular markers of niche cells to study their origins and fates and how they contribute to fin size and shape restoration. Overall design: We used RNA Seq to compare gene expression between three replicates of microdissected distal vs. proximal regenerating fin tissue as distinguished by distal shha:gfp expression. Each replicate consisted of pooled tissue from four caudal fins.",,,,dist 4,GSM3583367,,source name:96 hpa distal regenerate|transgene:shha:eGFP|tissue:regenerating caudal fin|time:96 hours post amputation,dist 4,Basecalling by Illumina Real Time Analysis 2 RTA2. Sequence reads were mapped to GRCz11/danRer11 using TopHat2 Mapped reads were counted using HTSeq Genome build: GRCz11/danRer11 Supplementary files format and content: Tab delimited text files of HTSeq counts for each sample are provided,96 hpa distal regenerate,,Tissue was collected and immediately placed in TRIzol reagent and homogenized. RNA was isolated using manufacturer's instruction. Libraries were prepared from 1ug of isolated RNA using Kapa stranded mRNA Seq kit and protocol.,,transgene:shha:eGFP|tissue:regenerating caudal fin|time:96 hours post amputation,GSM3583367,GSM3583367: dist 4; Danio rerio; RNA Seq,GSM3583367,,1,Tissue was collected and immediately placed in TRIzol reagent and homogenized. RNA was isolated using manufacturer's instruction. Libraries were prepared from 1ug of isolated RNA using Kapa stranded mRNA Seq kit and protocol.,GEO Accession:GSM3583367,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,cDNA,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,NextSeq 500,,SRP182846,,,D_H4_S9_R1_001.fastq,fastq,2464857182.0,29674986.0,GSM3583367 r1,0:83.06 1:0,A:605468091;C:597283347;G:564251292;T:696611465;N:1242987,83,0,,,605468091,597283347,564251292,696611465,1242987,SRX5307300,SRS4304840,SRA841050,GEO,"Stankunas, Biology- Institute of Molecular Biology, University of Oregon",1,0.95564,,0.13712,,0.72492,,0.52324,,83,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,nextseq,unknown,cdna_unspecified,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,United States,2019-01-29,Undetermined,Undetermined,Fin,Surface Structure 51076,SRR8503422,SRX5307299,SRS4304839,SRP182846,PRJNA517717,Transpositional scaling and niche transitions restore organ size and shape during zebrafish fin regeneration,GSE125859,Transcriptome Analysis,"Regenerating zebrafish fins have distal progenitor and proximal re differentiation zones. A Wnt producing ""niche"" population maintains distal cells in progenitor states. We sought to define molecular markers of niche cells to study their origins and fates and how they contribute to fin size and shape restoration. Overall design: We used RNA Seq to compare gene expression between three replicates of microdissected distal vs. proximal regenerating fin tissue as distinguished by distal shha:gfp expression. Each replicate consisted of pooled tissue from four caudal fins.",,,,dist 3,GSM3583366,,source name:96 hpa distal regenerate|transgene:shha:eGFP|tissue:regenerating caudal fin|time:96 hours post amputation,dist 3,Basecalling by Illumina Real Time Analysis 2 RTA2. Sequence reads were mapped to GRCz11/danRer11 using TopHat2 Mapped reads were counted using HTSeq Genome build: GRCz11/danRer11 Supplementary files format and content: Tab delimited text files of HTSeq counts for each sample are provided,96 hpa distal regenerate,,Tissue was collected and immediately placed in TRIzol reagent and homogenized. RNA was isolated using manufacturer's instruction. Libraries were prepared from 1ug of isolated RNA using Kapa stranded mRNA Seq kit and protocol.,,transgene:shha:eGFP|tissue:regenerating caudal fin|time:96 hours post amputation,GSM3583366,GSM3583366: dist 3; Danio rerio; RNA Seq,GSM3583366,,1,Tissue was collected and immediately placed in TRIzol reagent and homogenized. RNA was isolated using manufacturer's instruction. Libraries were prepared from 1ug of isolated RNA using Kapa stranded mRNA Seq kit and protocol.,GEO Accession:GSM3583366,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,cDNA,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,NextSeq 500,,SRP182846,,,D_H3_S5_R1_001.fastq,fastq,2722788315.0,32775698.0,GSM3583366 r1,0:83.07 1:0,A:668412932;C:661166177;G:622685501;T:770010239;N:513466,83,0,,,668412932,661166177,622685501,770010239,513466,SRX5307299,SRS4304839,SRA841050,GEO,"Stankunas, Biology- Institute of Molecular Biology, University of Oregon",1,0.95609,,0.14248,,0.71855,,0.51164,,84,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,nextseq,unknown,cdna_unspecified,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,United States,2019-01-29,Undetermined,Undetermined,Fin,Surface Structure 51077,SRR8503421,SRX5307298,SRS4304838,SRP182846,PRJNA517717,Transpositional scaling and niche transitions restore organ size and shape during zebrafish fin regeneration,GSE125859,Transcriptome Analysis,"Regenerating zebrafish fins have distal progenitor and proximal re differentiation zones. A Wnt producing ""niche"" population maintains distal cells in progenitor states. We sought to define molecular markers of niche cells to study their origins and fates and how they contribute to fin size and shape restoration. Overall design: We used RNA Seq to compare gene expression between three replicates of microdissected distal vs. proximal regenerating fin tissue as distinguished by distal shha:gfp expression. Each replicate consisted of pooled tissue from four caudal fins.",,,,dist 2,GSM3583365,,source name:96 hpa distal regenerate|transgene:shha:eGFP|tissue:regenerating caudal fin|time:96 hours post amputation,dist 2,Basecalling by Illumina Real Time Analysis 2 RTA2. Sequence reads were mapped to GRCz11/danRer11 using TopHat2 Mapped reads were counted using HTSeq Genome build: GRCz11/danRer11 Supplementary files format and content: Tab delimited text files of HTSeq counts for each sample are provided,96 hpa distal regenerate,,Tissue was collected and immediately placed in TRIzol reagent and homogenized. RNA was isolated using manufacturer's instruction. Libraries were prepared from 1ug of isolated RNA using Kapa stranded mRNA Seq kit and protocol.,,transgene:shha:eGFP|tissue:regenerating caudal fin|time:96 hours post amputation,GSM3583365,GSM3583365: dist 2; Danio rerio; RNA Seq,GSM3583365,,1,Tissue was collected and immediately placed in TRIzol reagent and homogenized. RNA was isolated using manufacturer's instruction. Libraries were prepared from 1ug of isolated RNA using Kapa stranded mRNA Seq kit and protocol.,GEO Accession:GSM3583365,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,cDNA,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,NextSeq 500,,SRP182846,,,D_H2_S1_R1_001.fastq,fastq,2701672782.0,32524371.0,GSM3583365 r1,0:83.07 1:0,A:655498678;C:666854715;G:624383445;T:753418035;N:1517909,83,0,,,655498678,666854715,624383445,753418035,1517909,SRX5307298,SRS4304838,SRA841050,GEO,"Stankunas, Biology- Institute of Molecular Biology, University of Oregon",1,0.95937,,0.14803,,0.72569,,0.5327,,81,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,nextseq,unknown,cdna_unspecified,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,United States,2019-01-29,Undetermined,Undetermined,Fin,Surface Structure 53587,SRR11886668,SRX8434202,SRS6745285,SRP265421,PRJNA559885,A comparative epigenomic and single cell transcriptomic analysis of teleost regeneration,PRJNA559885,Other,The ability to regenerate body parts lost to amputation is widely but non uniformly distributed in animals. Species such as bony fishes display extensive regenerative capacities while others such as mammals regenerate poorly. Even though regeneration has been the subject of extensive phylogenetic developmental cellular and molecular studies the mechanisms underlying the broad disparity of regenerative capacities in animals remain elusive. Here we report on a comparative epigenomic and transcriptomic approach which identified an evolutionarily conserved regeneration response program in vertebrates. By defining the cis regulomes and single cell transcriptomes of early stages of regeneration in the distantly related African killifish Nothobranchius furzeri and the zebrafish Danio rerio we uncovered species specific and evolutionarily conserved genomic responses to amputation.,,,,zebrafish fin regeneration,zebrafish fin 1dpa,,strain:AB|isolate:12|breed:N/A|cultivar:N/A|ecotype:N/A|age:6 mpf|dev stage:Adult|sex:not collected|tissue:caudal fin|BioSampleModel:Model organism or animal,,,,,,,,,zebrafish RNAseq 1dpa R3,L34024,L34024,Three biological replicates 6 fish per replicate were prepared for each fin regeneration time point. Ten different African killifish time points were studied including 0dpa 3hpa 6hpa 14hpa 1dpa 2dpa 3dpa 4dpa 7dpa and 18dpa. Samples from 0dpa and 1dpa were collected for zebrafish. All the freshly dissected samples used for RNA seq were quickly rinsed in cold PBS and placed in a 1.5 ml Eppendorf tube followed by flash freezing in liquid nitrogen. Samples were then homogenized with a sterile pestle in 1 ml Trizol reagent Ambion and stored at 80 C until RNA extraction.,,,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,RANDOM,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,Illumina HiSeq 2500,,SRP265421,,,ws_3_1_GCCAAT.fastq.gz,fastq,1907555958.0,37403058.0,ws 3 1 GCCAAT.fastq.gz,0:51 1:0,A:417030128;C:470533688;G:468961155;T:550856047;N:174940,51,0,,,417030128,470533688,468961155,550856047,174940,SRX8434202,SRS6745285,SRA1081627,Stowers Institute for Medical Research|Sanchez lab,Stowers Institute for Medical Research,1,0.96213,,0.05602,,0.72967,,0.45848,,51,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,hiseq_era,unknown,random_priming,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,United States,2020-05-31,Adult,Adult,Fin,Surface Structure 53588,SRR11886669,SRX8434201,SRS6745285,SRP265421,PRJNA559885,A comparative epigenomic and single cell transcriptomic analysis of teleost regeneration,PRJNA559885,Other,The ability to regenerate body parts lost to amputation is widely but non uniformly distributed in animals. Species such as bony fishes display extensive regenerative capacities while others such as mammals regenerate poorly. Even though regeneration has been the subject of extensive phylogenetic developmental cellular and molecular studies the mechanisms underlying the broad disparity of regenerative capacities in animals remain elusive. Here we report on a comparative epigenomic and transcriptomic approach which identified an evolutionarily conserved regeneration response program in vertebrates. By defining the cis regulomes and single cell transcriptomes of early stages of regeneration in the distantly related African killifish Nothobranchius furzeri and the zebrafish Danio rerio we uncovered species specific and evolutionarily conserved genomic responses to amputation.,,,,zebrafish fin regeneration,zebrafish fin 1dpa,,strain:AB|isolate:12|breed:N/A|cultivar:N/A|ecotype:N/A|age:6 mpf|dev stage:Adult|sex:not collected|tissue:caudal fin|BioSampleModel:Model organism or animal,,,,,,,,,zebrafish RNAseq 1dpa R2,L34023,L34023,Three biological replicates 6 fish per replicate were prepared for each fin regeneration time point. Ten different African killifish time points were studied including 0dpa 3hpa 6hpa 14hpa 1dpa 2dpa 3dpa 4dpa 7dpa and 18dpa. Samples from 0dpa and 1dpa were collected for zebrafish. All the freshly dissected samples used for RNA seq were quickly rinsed in cold PBS and placed in a 1.5 ml Eppendorf tube followed by flash freezing in liquid nitrogen. Samples were then homogenized with a sterile pestle in 1 ml Trizol reagent Ambion and stored at 80 C until RNA extraction.,,,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,RANDOM,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,Illumina HiSeq 2500,,SRP265421,,,ws_3_1_ACAGTG.fastq.gz,fastq,1731933225.0,33959475.0,ws 3 1 ACAGTG.fastq.gz,0:51 1:0,A:381487795;C:424246634;G:426026749;T:500012138;N:159909,51,0,,,381487795,424246634,426026749,500012138,159909,SRX8434201,SRS6745285,SRA1081627,Stowers Institute for Medical Research|Sanchez lab,Stowers Institute for Medical Research,1,0.96269,,0.05578,,0.73261,,0.45837,,51,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,hiseq_era,unknown,random_priming,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,United States,2020-05-31,Adult,Adult,Fin,Surface Structure 53589,SRR11886671,SRX8434200,SRS6745285,SRP265421,PRJNA559885,A comparative epigenomic and single cell transcriptomic analysis of teleost regeneration,PRJNA559885,Other,The ability to regenerate body parts lost to amputation is widely but non uniformly distributed in animals. Species such as bony fishes display extensive regenerative capacities while others such as mammals regenerate poorly. Even though regeneration has been the subject of extensive phylogenetic developmental cellular and molecular studies the mechanisms underlying the broad disparity of regenerative capacities in animals remain elusive. Here we report on a comparative epigenomic and transcriptomic approach which identified an evolutionarily conserved regeneration response program in vertebrates. By defining the cis regulomes and single cell transcriptomes of early stages of regeneration in the distantly related African killifish Nothobranchius furzeri and the zebrafish Danio rerio we uncovered species specific and evolutionarily conserved genomic responses to amputation.,,,,zebrafish fin regeneration,zebrafish fin 1dpa,,strain:AB|isolate:12|breed:N/A|cultivar:N/A|ecotype:N/A|age:6 mpf|dev stage:Adult|sex:not collected|tissue:caudal fin|BioSampleModel:Model organism or animal,,,,,,,,,zebrafish RNAseq 1dpa R1,L34022,L34022,Three biological replicates 6 fish per replicate were prepared for each fin regeneration time point. Ten different African killifish time points were studied including 0dpa 3hpa 6hpa 14hpa 1dpa 2dpa 3dpa 4dpa 7dpa and 18dpa. Samples from 0dpa and 1dpa were collected for zebrafish. All the freshly dissected samples used for RNA seq were quickly rinsed in cold PBS and placed in a 1.5 ml Eppendorf tube followed by flash freezing in liquid nitrogen. Samples were then homogenized with a sterile pestle in 1 ml Trizol reagent Ambion and stored at 80 C until RNA extraction.,,,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,RANDOM,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,Illumina HiSeq 2500,,SRP265421,,,ws_3_1_TGACCA.fastq.gz,fastq,1814021907.0,35569057.0,ws 3 1 TGACCA.fastq.gz,0:51 1:0,A:404693395;C:438897306;G:444600496;T:525663505;N:167205,51,0,,,404693395,438897306,444600496,525663505,167205,SRX8434200,SRS6745285,SRA1081627,Stowers Institute for Medical Research|Sanchez lab,Stowers Institute for Medical Research,1,0.95686,,0.06383,,0.72677,,0.44564,,51,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,hiseq_era,unknown,random_priming,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,United States,2020-05-31,Adult,Adult,Fin,Surface Structure 53590,SRR11886672,SRX8434199,SRS6745284,SRP265421,PRJNA559885,A comparative epigenomic and single cell transcriptomic analysis of teleost regeneration,PRJNA559885,Other,The ability to regenerate body parts lost to amputation is widely but non uniformly distributed in animals. Species such as bony fishes display extensive regenerative capacities while others such as mammals regenerate poorly. Even though regeneration has been the subject of extensive phylogenetic developmental cellular and molecular studies the mechanisms underlying the broad disparity of regenerative capacities in animals remain elusive. Here we report on a comparative epigenomic and transcriptomic approach which identified an evolutionarily conserved regeneration response program in vertebrates. By defining the cis regulomes and single cell transcriptomes of early stages of regeneration in the distantly related African killifish Nothobranchius furzeri and the zebrafish Danio rerio we uncovered species specific and evolutionarily conserved genomic responses to amputation.,,,,zebrafish fin regeneration,zebrafish fin 0dpa,,strain:AB|isolate:11|breed:N/A|cultivar:N/A|ecotype:N/A|age:6 mpf|dev stage:Adult|sex:not collected|tissue:caudal fin|BioSampleModel:Model organism or animal,,,,,,,,,zebrafish RNAseq 0dpa R3,L34021,L34021,Three biological replicates 6 fish per replicate were prepared for each fin regeneration time point. Ten different African killifish time points were studied including 0dpa 3hpa 6hpa 14hpa 1dpa 2dpa 3dpa 4dpa 7dpa and 18dpa. Samples from 0dpa and 1dpa were collected for zebrafish. All the freshly dissected samples used for RNA seq were quickly rinsed in cold PBS and placed in a 1.5 ml Eppendorf tube followed by flash freezing in liquid nitrogen. Samples were then homogenized with a sterile pestle in 1 ml Trizol reagent Ambion and stored at 80 C until RNA extraction.,,,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,RANDOM,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,Illumina HiSeq 2500,,SRP265421,,,ws_3_1_TTAGGC.fastq.gz,fastq,1894657395.0,37150145.0,ws 3 1 TTAGGC.fastq.gz,0:51 1:0,A:424630121;C:461337738;G:460024108;T:548490887;N:174541,51,0,,,424630121,461337738,460024108,548490887,174541,SRX8434199,SRS6745284,SRA1081627,Stowers Institute for Medical Research|Sanchez lab,Stowers Institute for Medical Research,1,0.9524,,0.08535,,0.70999,,0.44299,,51,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,hiseq_era,unknown,random_priming,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,United States,2020-05-31,Adult,Adult,Fin,Surface Structure 53591,SRR11886673,SRX8434198,SRS6745284,SRP265421,PRJNA559885,A comparative epigenomic and single cell transcriptomic analysis of teleost regeneration,PRJNA559885,Other,The ability to regenerate body parts lost to amputation is widely but non uniformly distributed in animals. Species such as bony fishes display extensive regenerative capacities while others such as mammals regenerate poorly. Even though regeneration has been the subject of extensive phylogenetic developmental cellular and molecular studies the mechanisms underlying the broad disparity of regenerative capacities in animals remain elusive. Here we report on a comparative epigenomic and transcriptomic approach which identified an evolutionarily conserved regeneration response program in vertebrates. By defining the cis regulomes and single cell transcriptomes of early stages of regeneration in the distantly related African killifish Nothobranchius furzeri and the zebrafish Danio rerio we uncovered species specific and evolutionarily conserved genomic responses to amputation.,,,,zebrafish fin regeneration,zebrafish fin 0dpa,,strain:AB|isolate:11|breed:N/A|cultivar:N/A|ecotype:N/A|age:6 mpf|dev stage:Adult|sex:not collected|tissue:caudal fin|BioSampleModel:Model organism or animal,,,,,,,,,zebrafish RNAseq 0dpa R2,L34020,L34020,Three biological replicates 6 fish per replicate were prepared for each fin regeneration time point. Ten different African killifish time points were studied including 0dpa 3hpa 6hpa 14hpa 1dpa 2dpa 3dpa 4dpa 7dpa and 18dpa. Samples from 0dpa and 1dpa were collected for zebrafish. All the freshly dissected samples used for RNA seq were quickly rinsed in cold PBS and placed in a 1.5 ml Eppendorf tube followed by flash freezing in liquid nitrogen. Samples were then homogenized with a sterile pestle in 1 ml Trizol reagent Ambion and stored at 80 C until RNA extraction.,,,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,RANDOM,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,Illumina HiSeq 2500,,SRP265421,,,ws_3_1_CGATGT.fastq.gz,fastq,1826016036.0,35804236.0,ws 3 1 CGATGT.fastq.gz,0:51 1:0,A:408512993;C:445830968;G:443573205;T:527930321;N:168549,51,0,,,408512993,445830968,443573205,527930321,168549,SRX8434198,SRS6745284,SRA1081627,Stowers Institute for Medical Research|Sanchez lab,Stowers Institute for Medical Research,1,0.95224,,0.08373,,0.70934,,0.45345,,51,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,hiseq_era,unknown,random_priming,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,United States,2020-05-31,Adult,Adult,Fin,Surface Structure 53592,SRR11886674,SRX8434197,SRS6745284,SRP265421,PRJNA559885,A comparative epigenomic and single cell transcriptomic analysis of teleost regeneration,PRJNA559885,Other,The ability to regenerate body parts lost to amputation is widely but non uniformly distributed in animals. Species such as bony fishes display extensive regenerative capacities while others such as mammals regenerate poorly. Even though regeneration has been the subject of extensive phylogenetic developmental cellular and molecular studies the mechanisms underlying the broad disparity of regenerative capacities in animals remain elusive. Here we report on a comparative epigenomic and transcriptomic approach which identified an evolutionarily conserved regeneration response program in vertebrates. By defining the cis regulomes and single cell transcriptomes of early stages of regeneration in the distantly related African killifish Nothobranchius furzeri and the zebrafish Danio rerio we uncovered species specific and evolutionarily conserved genomic responses to amputation.,,,,zebrafish fin regeneration,zebrafish fin 0dpa,,strain:AB|isolate:11|breed:N/A|cultivar:N/A|ecotype:N/A|age:6 mpf|dev stage:Adult|sex:not collected|tissue:caudal fin|BioSampleModel:Model organism or animal,,,,,,,,,zebrafish RNAseq 0dpa R1,L34019,L34019,Three biological replicates 6 fish per replicate were prepared for each fin regeneration time point. Ten different African killifish time points were studied including 0dpa 3hpa 6hpa 14hpa 1dpa 2dpa 3dpa 4dpa 7dpa and 18dpa. Samples from 0dpa and 1dpa were collected for zebrafish. All the freshly dissected samples used for RNA seq were quickly rinsed in cold PBS and placed in a 1.5 ml Eppendorf tube followed by flash freezing in liquid nitrogen. Samples were then homogenized with a sterile pestle in 1 ml Trizol reagent Ambion and stored at 80 C until RNA extraction.,,,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,RANDOM,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,Illumina HiSeq 2500,,SRP265421,,,ws_3_1_ATCACG.fastq.gz,fastq,1889698206.0,37052906.0,ws 3 1 ATCACG.fastq.gz,0:51 1:0,A:425019592;C:459513661;G:459679307;T:545311781;N:173865,51,0,,,425019592,459513661,459679307,545311781,173865,SRX8434197,SRS6745284,SRA1081627,Stowers Institute for Medical Research|Sanchez lab,Stowers Institute for Medical Research,1,0.95224,,0.08995,,0.71106,,0.45283,,51,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,hiseq_era,unknown,random_priming,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,United States,2020-05-31,Adult,Adult,Fin,Surface Structure 54194,SRR10106419,SRX6838311,SRS5379334,SRP221490,PRJNA565225,longfin causes cis ectopic expression of the kcnh2a ether a go go K+ channel to autonomously prolong fin outgrowth,GSE137352,Transcriptome Analysis,longfin mutant zebrafish grow and regenerate abnormally long fins. We sought to determine misregulated transcripts in the distal regenerate of 96 hpa caudal fins that could contribute to fin overgrowth or be the longfin causal gene. Overall design: We used RNA Seq to compare gene expression between replicates of microdissected distal regenerating fin tissue distinguished by GFP negative tissue distal to sp7:GFP expressing cells collected from longfin heterozygous adult fish and homozygous wildtype clutchmates. Each replicate consisted of pooled tissue from four caudal fins.,,,,WT 2,GSM4076982,,source name:96 hpa WT distal regenerate|genotype:wildtype|transgene:sp7:eGFP|tissue:regenerating caudal fin|time:96 hours post amputation,WT 2,Basecalling by Illumina Real Time Analysis 2 RTA2. Sequence reads were mapped to GRCz11/danRer11 using TopHat2 Mapped reads were counted using HTSeq Genome build: GRCz11/danRer11 Supplementary files format and content: Tab delimited text files of HTSeq counts for each sample are provided,96 hpa WT distal regenerate,,Tissue was collected and immediately homogenized in TRIzol reagent. RNA was isolated following the manufacturer's instruction. Libraries were prepared from 1 mg of isolated RNA using Kapa stranded mRNA Seq kit and protocol.,,genotype:wildtype|transgene:sp7:eGFP|tissue:regenerating caudal fin|time:96 hours post amputation,GSM4076982,GSM4076982: WT 2; Danio rerio; RNA Seq,GSM4076982,,1,Tissue was collected and immediately homogenized in TRIzol reagent. RNA was isolated following the manufacturer's instruction. Libraries were prepared from 1 mg of isolated RNA using Kapa stranded mRNA Seq kit and protocol.,GEO Accession:GSM4076982,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,cDNA,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,Illumina HiSeq 4000,,SRP221490,,,WT_2_S11_L001_R1_001.fastq,fastq,3503248731.0,34685631.0,GSM4076982 r1,0:101 1:0,A:856635056;C:863594849;G:805408294;T:977416095;N:194437,101,0,,,856635056,863594849,805408294,977416095,194437,SRX6838311,SRS5379334,SRA961168,GEO,"Stankunas, Biology- Institute of Molecular Biology, University of Oregon",1,0.94631,,0.13289,,0.71407,,0.50936,,101,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,hiseq_era,unknown,cdna_unspecified,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,United States,2019-09-12,Undetermined,Adult,Fin,Surface Structure 54195,SRR10106418,SRX6838310,SRS5379333,SRP221490,PRJNA565225,longfin causes cis ectopic expression of the kcnh2a ether a go go K+ channel to autonomously prolong fin outgrowth,GSE137352,Transcriptome Analysis,longfin mutant zebrafish grow and regenerate abnormally long fins. We sought to determine misregulated transcripts in the distal regenerate of 96 hpa caudal fins that could contribute to fin overgrowth or be the longfin causal gene. Overall design: We used RNA Seq to compare gene expression between replicates of microdissected distal regenerating fin tissue distinguished by GFP negative tissue distal to sp7:GFP expressing cells collected from longfin heterozygous adult fish and homozygous wildtype clutchmates. Each replicate consisted of pooled tissue from four caudal fins.,,,,WT 1,GSM4076981,,source name:96 hpa WT distal regenerate|genotype:wildtype|transgene:sp7:eGFP|tissue:regenerating caudal fin|time:96 hours post amputation,WT 1,Basecalling by Illumina Real Time Analysis 2 RTA2. Sequence reads were mapped to GRCz11/danRer11 using TopHat2 Mapped reads were counted using HTSeq Genome build: GRCz11/danRer11 Supplementary files format and content: Tab delimited text files of HTSeq counts for each sample are provided,96 hpa WT distal regenerate,,Tissue was collected and immediately homogenized in TRIzol reagent. RNA was isolated following the manufacturer's instruction. Libraries were prepared from 1 mg of isolated RNA using Kapa stranded mRNA Seq kit and protocol.,,genotype:wildtype|transgene:sp7:eGFP|tissue:regenerating caudal fin|time:96 hours post amputation,GSM4076981,GSM4076981: WT 1; Danio rerio; RNA Seq,GSM4076981,,1,Tissue was collected and immediately homogenized in TRIzol reagent. RNA was isolated following the manufacturer's instruction. Libraries were prepared from 1 mg of isolated RNA using Kapa stranded mRNA Seq kit and protocol.,GEO Accession:GSM4076981,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,cDNA,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,Illumina HiSeq 4000,,SRP221490,,,WT_1_S10_L001_R1_001.fastq,fastq,3199705452.0,31680252.0,GSM4076981 r1,0:101 1:0,A:778841443;C:803844530;G:739237022;T:877613128;N:169329,101,0,,,778841443,803844530,739237022,877613128,169329,SRX6838310,SRS5379333,SRA961168,GEO,"Stankunas, Biology- Institute of Molecular Biology, University of Oregon",1,0.94697,,0.15905,,0.72707,,0.53718,,101,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,hiseq_era,unknown,cdna_unspecified,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,United States,2019-09-12,Undetermined,Adult,Fin,Surface Structure 54196,SRR10106417,SRX6838309,SRS5379332,SRP221490,PRJNA565225,longfin causes cis ectopic expression of the kcnh2a ether a go go K+ channel to autonomously prolong fin outgrowth,GSE137352,Transcriptome Analysis,longfin mutant zebrafish grow and regenerate abnormally long fins. We sought to determine misregulated transcripts in the distal regenerate of 96 hpa caudal fins that could contribute to fin overgrowth or be the longfin causal gene. Overall design: We used RNA Seq to compare gene expression between replicates of microdissected distal regenerating fin tissue distinguished by GFP negative tissue distal to sp7:GFP expressing cells collected from longfin heterozygous adult fish and homozygous wildtype clutchmates. Each replicate consisted of pooled tissue from four caudal fins.,,,,lof 2,GSM4076980,,source name:96 hpa lof distal regenerate|genotype:longfin heterozygous|transgene:sp7:eGFP|tissue:regenerating caudal fin|time:96 hours post amputation,lof 2,Basecalling by Illumina Real Time Analysis 2 RTA2. Sequence reads were mapped to GRCz11/danRer11 using TopHat2 Mapped reads were counted using HTSeq Genome build: GRCz11/danRer11 Supplementary files format and content: Tab delimited text files of HTSeq counts for each sample are provided,96 hpa lof distal regenerate,,Tissue was collected and immediately homogenized in TRIzol reagent. RNA was isolated following the manufacturer's instruction. Libraries were prepared from 1 mg of isolated RNA using Kapa stranded mRNA Seq kit and protocol.,,genotype:longfin heterozygous|transgene:sp7:eGFP|tissue:regenerating caudal fin|time:96 hours post amputation,GSM4076980,GSM4076980: lof 2; Danio rerio; RNA Seq,GSM4076980,,1,Tissue was collected and immediately homogenized in TRIzol reagent. RNA was isolated following the manufacturer's instruction. Libraries were prepared from 1 mg of isolated RNA using Kapa stranded mRNA Seq kit and protocol.,GEO Accession:GSM4076980,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,cDNA,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,Illumina HiSeq 4000,,SRP221490,,,1_of_2_S8_L001_R1_001.fastq,fastq,2946970526.0,29177926.0,GSM4076980 r1,0:101 1:0,A:707921237;C:746733959;G:690249641;T:801925953;N:139736,101,0,,,707921237,746733959,690249641,801925953,139736,SRX6838309,SRS5379332,SRA961168,GEO,"Stankunas, Biology- Institute of Molecular Biology, University of Oregon",1,0.94681,,0.1304,,0.72261,,0.5216,,101,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,hiseq_era,unknown,cdna_unspecified,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,United States,2019-09-12,Undetermined,Adult,Fin,Surface Structure 54197,SRR10106416,SRX6838308,SRS5379331,SRP221490,PRJNA565225,longfin causes cis ectopic expression of the kcnh2a ether a go go K+ channel to autonomously prolong fin outgrowth,GSE137352,Transcriptome Analysis,longfin mutant zebrafish grow and regenerate abnormally long fins. We sought to determine misregulated transcripts in the distal regenerate of 96 hpa caudal fins that could contribute to fin overgrowth or be the longfin causal gene. Overall design: We used RNA Seq to compare gene expression between replicates of microdissected distal regenerating fin tissue distinguished by GFP negative tissue distal to sp7:GFP expressing cells collected from longfin heterozygous adult fish and homozygous wildtype clutchmates. Each replicate consisted of pooled tissue from four caudal fins.,,,,lof 1,GSM4076979,,source name:96 hpa lof distal regenerate|genotype:longfin heterozygous|transgene:sp7:eGFP|tissue:regenerating caudal fin|time:96 hours post amputation,lof 1,Basecalling by Illumina Real Time Analysis 2 RTA2. Sequence reads were mapped to GRCz11/danRer11 using TopHat2 Mapped reads were counted using HTSeq Genome build: GRCz11/danRer11 Supplementary files format and content: Tab delimited text files of HTSeq counts for each sample are provided,96 hpa lof distal regenerate,,Tissue was collected and immediately homogenized in TRIzol reagent. RNA was isolated following the manufacturer's instruction. Libraries were prepared from 1 mg of isolated RNA using Kapa stranded mRNA Seq kit and protocol.,,genotype:longfin heterozygous|transgene:sp7:eGFP|tissue:regenerating caudal fin|time:96 hours post amputation,GSM4076979,GSM4076979: lof 1; Danio rerio; RNA Seq,GSM4076979,,1,Tissue was collected and immediately homogenized in TRIzol reagent. RNA was isolated following the manufacturer's instruction. Libraries were prepared from 1 mg of isolated RNA using Kapa stranded mRNA Seq kit and protocol.,GEO Accession:GSM4076979,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,cDNA,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,Illumina HiSeq 4000,,SRP221490,,,1_of_1_S7_L001_R1_001.fastq,fastq,3227655081.0,31956981.0,GSM4076979 r1,0:101 1:0,A:797302923;C:790047797;G:741073759;T:899054640;N:175962,101,0,,,797302923,790047797,741073759,899054640,175962,SRX6838308,SRS5379331,SRA961168,GEO,"Stankunas, Biology- Institute of Molecular Biology, University of Oregon",1,0.94695,,0.12773,,0.71656,,0.51165,,101,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,hiseq_era,unknown,cdna_unspecified,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,United States,2019-09-12,Undetermined,Adult,Fin,Surface Structure 58389,SRR11486781,SRX8062812,SRS6431234,SRP252754,PRJNA612515,Tissue Regeneration Enhancer Element Discovery by Chromatin Accessibility Profiling of Regenerating Zebrafish Fins,GSE146960,Other,Mammalian genomes likely encode all gene products required to regenerate an amputated limb yet they lack the correct instructions for strategically modulating those gene products to accomplish limb regeneration. Zebrafish and many other non mammalian vertebrates possess these instructions which exist as gene cis regulatory elements. Here to identify candidate tissue regeneration enhancer elements TREEs important for zebrafish fin regeneration we performed ATAC seq from bulk tissue or purified fibroblasts of uninjured and regenerating caudal fins. We identified thousands of DNA regions from each tissue type with dynamic accessibility during regeneration and assigned these regions to proximal genes with corresponding changes in RNA levels. To determine whether these profiles revealed bona fide TREEs we tested the sufficiency of several sequences in stable transgenic and mutant lines. These experiments identified new regulatory sequences near several induced and/or required genes including fgf20a cx43 and mdka with unique expression domains for each confirmed TREE. Deletion of TREE sequences from the zebrafish genome revealed requirements and redundancies surrounding cis regulatory regions. Our study generates a novel resource for dissecting the regulatory mechanisms of appendage regeneration. Overall design: Samples were enzymatically dissociated with Liberase and collected in biological triplicates for RNA and ATAC library preparation. Corresponding sample pools include: whole fin 0 dpa and whole fin 4 dpa whole fin 0 dpa and whole fin 1 dpa and fibroblast 0 dpa and fibroblast 4 dpa.,,pubmed:32665240,,RNAseq; LEN deletion; 2dpa; injured; batch 3; rep1,GSM4455083,,source name:whole fin|date:2 dpa|tissue:whole fin,RNAseq; LEN deletion; 2dpa; injured; batch 3; rep1,RNA Seq reads were trimmed by Trim Galore 0.6.4 with q 15 and then mapped with TopHat v 2.1.1 with parameters b2 very sensitive no coverage search and supplying the UCSC danRer10 refSeq gene annotation. Gene level read counts were obtained using the htseq count v1.6.1 by the reads with MAPQ greater than 30. Genome build: danRer10 Supplementary files format and content: raw counts of sequencing reads for the features of interest for RNAseq,whole fin,For fibroblast libraries triplicate Tgtph1b:creER;ubi:switch caudal fins were clipped and treated at 2dpa for 12 hours in 4uM Tamoxifen Sigma Aldritch Tornini et al. 2016. Fins were allowed to regenerate fully for two months and 75 fish fin samples were pooled for each biological replicate pool.,For RNA seq biological triplicate D. rerio caudal fin clip pools were collected at 0 dpa 1 dpa or 4 dpa time points via razor blade VWR from 15 fish aged between 3 month 12 month. Fin tissue was collected in Tri Reagent Sigma and isolated by ethanol precipitation. RNA was further purified with the RNA Clean & Concentrator Kit 5 Zymo. RNA seq libraries were prepared using a Stranded mRNA seq Kit KAPA.,D. rerio from the outbred Ekkwill EK strain ranging from 4 month to 12 month were used for whole fin library preparations Tgtph1b:mCherry NTR;ubi:switch fish were used for fibroblast library preparation Tornini et al 2016. Water temperature was maintained at 27.5°C and fish were kept on a 14/10 light/dark cycle. Fish were anesthetized in 0.75% v/v 2 phenoxyethanol Sigma Aldrich in fish water. Work with D. rerio was performed in accordance with Duke University guidelines.,date:2 dpa|tissue:whole fin,GSM4455083,GSM4455083: RNAseq; LEN deletion; 2dpa; injured; batch 3; rep1; Danio rerio; RNA Seq,GSM4455083,,1,For RNA seq biological triplicate D. rerio caudal fin clip pools were collected at 0 dpa 1 dpa or 4 dpa time points via razor blade VWR from 15 fish aged between 3 month 12 month. Fin tissue was collected in Tri Reagent Sigma and isolated by ethanol precipitation. RNA was further purified with the RNA Clean & Concentrator Kit 5 Zymo. RNA seq libraries were prepared using a Stranded mRNA seq Kit KAPA.,GEO Accession:GSM4455083,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,cDNA,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,Illumina HiSeq 4000,,SRP252754,,,JK-S8_S75_L008_R1_001.fastq.gz,fastq,2464411341.0,48321791.0,GSM4455083 r1,0:51 1:0,A:620643336;C:590840801;G:549905028;T:702758180;N:263996,51,0,,,620643336,590840801,549905028,702758180,263996,SRX8062812,SRS6431234,SRA1054723,GEO,"Poss, Cell Biology, Duke University",1,0.91677,,0.09917,,0.71981,,0.46761,,51,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,hiseq_era,unknown,cdna_unspecified,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,United States,2020-04-06,Multi-stage,Multi-stage,Fin,Surface Structure 58390,SRR11486780,SRX8062811,SRS6431233,SRP252754,PRJNA612515,Tissue Regeneration Enhancer Element Discovery by Chromatin Accessibility Profiling of Regenerating Zebrafish Fins,GSE146960,Other,Mammalian genomes likely encode all gene products required to regenerate an amputated limb yet they lack the correct instructions for strategically modulating those gene products to accomplish limb regeneration. Zebrafish and many other non mammalian vertebrates possess these instructions which exist as gene cis regulatory elements. Here to identify candidate tissue regeneration enhancer elements TREEs important for zebrafish fin regeneration we performed ATAC seq from bulk tissue or purified fibroblasts of uninjured and regenerating caudal fins. We identified thousands of DNA regions from each tissue type with dynamic accessibility during regeneration and assigned these regions to proximal genes with corresponding changes in RNA levels. To determine whether these profiles revealed bona fide TREEs we tested the sufficiency of several sequences in stable transgenic and mutant lines. These experiments identified new regulatory sequences near several induced and/or required genes including fgf20a cx43 and mdka with unique expression domains for each confirmed TREE. Deletion of TREE sequences from the zebrafish genome revealed requirements and redundancies surrounding cis regulatory regions. Our study generates a novel resource for dissecting the regulatory mechanisms of appendage regeneration. Overall design: Samples were enzymatically dissociated with Liberase and collected in biological triplicates for RNA and ATAC library preparation. Corresponding sample pools include: whole fin 0 dpa and whole fin 4 dpa whole fin 0 dpa and whole fin 1 dpa and fibroblast 0 dpa and fibroblast 4 dpa.,,pubmed:32665240,,RNAseq; whole fin; 2dpa; injured; batch 3; rep1,GSM4455082,,source name:whole fin|date:2 dpa|tissue:whole fin,RNAseq; whole fin; 2dpa; injured; batch 3; rep1,RNA Seq reads were trimmed by Trim Galore 0.6.4 with q 15 and then mapped with TopHat v 2.1.1 with parameters b2 very sensitive no coverage search and supplying the UCSC danRer10 refSeq gene annotation. Gene level read counts were obtained using the htseq count v1.6.1 by the reads with MAPQ greater than 30. Genome build: danRer10 Supplementary files format and content: raw counts of sequencing reads for the features of interest for RNAseq,whole fin,For fibroblast libraries triplicate Tgtph1b:creER;ubi:switch caudal fins were clipped and treated at 2dpa for 12 hours in 4uM Tamoxifen Sigma Aldritch Tornini et al. 2016. Fins were allowed to regenerate fully for two months and 75 fish fin samples were pooled for each biological replicate pool.,For RNA seq biological triplicate D. rerio caudal fin clip pools were collected at 0 dpa 1 dpa or 4 dpa time points via razor blade VWR from 15 fish aged between 3 month 12 month. Fin tissue was collected in Tri Reagent Sigma and isolated by ethanol precipitation. RNA was further purified with the RNA Clean & Concentrator Kit 5 Zymo. RNA seq libraries were prepared using a Stranded mRNA seq Kit KAPA.,D. rerio from the outbred Ekkwill EK strain ranging from 4 month to 12 month were used for whole fin library preparations Tgtph1b:mCherry NTR;ubi:switch fish were used for fibroblast library preparation Tornini et al 2016. Water temperature was maintained at 27.5°C and fish were kept on a 14/10 light/dark cycle. Fish were anesthetized in 0.75% v/v 2 phenoxyethanol Sigma Aldrich in fish water. Work with D. rerio was performed in accordance with Duke University guidelines.,date:2 dpa|tissue:whole fin,GSM4455082,GSM4455082: RNAseq; whole fin; 2dpa; injured; batch 3; rep1; Danio rerio; RNA Seq,GSM4455082,,1,For RNA seq biological triplicate D. rerio caudal fin clip pools were collected at 0 dpa 1 dpa or 4 dpa time points via razor blade VWR from 15 fish aged between 3 month 12 month. Fin tissue was collected in Tri Reagent Sigma and isolated by ethanol precipitation. RNA was further purified with the RNA Clean & Concentrator Kit 5 Zymo. RNA seq libraries were prepared using a Stranded mRNA seq Kit KAPA.,GEO Accession:GSM4455082,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,cDNA,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,Illumina HiSeq 4000,,SRP252754,,,JK-S6_S73_L008_R1_001.fastq.gz,fastq,2567417214.0,50341514.0,GSM4455082 r1,0:51 1:0,A:648888081;C:617286062;G:571907197;T:729086777;N:249097,51,0,,,648888081,617286062,571907197,729086777,249097,SRX8062811,SRS6431233,SRA1054723,GEO,"Poss, Cell Biology, Duke University",1,0.91819,,0.10483,,0.72062,,0.45077,,51,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,hiseq_era,unknown,cdna_unspecified,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,United States,2020-04-06,Multi-stage,Multi-stage,Fin,Surface Structure 58391,SRR11486779,SRX8062810,SRS6431232,SRP252754,PRJNA612515,Tissue Regeneration Enhancer Element Discovery by Chromatin Accessibility Profiling of Regenerating Zebrafish Fins,GSE146960,Other,Mammalian genomes likely encode all gene products required to regenerate an amputated limb yet they lack the correct instructions for strategically modulating those gene products to accomplish limb regeneration. Zebrafish and many other non mammalian vertebrates possess these instructions which exist as gene cis regulatory elements. Here to identify candidate tissue regeneration enhancer elements TREEs important for zebrafish fin regeneration we performed ATAC seq from bulk tissue or purified fibroblasts of uninjured and regenerating caudal fins. We identified thousands of DNA regions from each tissue type with dynamic accessibility during regeneration and assigned these regions to proximal genes with corresponding changes in RNA levels. To determine whether these profiles revealed bona fide TREEs we tested the sufficiency of several sequences in stable transgenic and mutant lines. These experiments identified new regulatory sequences near several induced and/or required genes including fgf20a cx43 and mdka with unique expression domains for each confirmed TREE. Deletion of TREE sequences from the zebrafish genome revealed requirements and redundancies surrounding cis regulatory regions. Our study generates a novel resource for dissecting the regulatory mechanisms of appendage regeneration. Overall design: Samples were enzymatically dissociated with Liberase and collected in biological triplicates for RNA and ATAC library preparation. Corresponding sample pools include: whole fin 0 dpa and whole fin 4 dpa whole fin 0 dpa and whole fin 1 dpa and fibroblast 0 dpa and fibroblast 4 dpa.,,pubmed:32665240,,RNAseq; LEN deletion; 0dpa; uninjured; batch 3; rep1,GSM4455081,,source name:whole fin|date:0 dpa|tissue:whole fin,RNAseq; LEN deletion; 0dpa; uninjured; batch 3; rep1,RNA Seq reads were trimmed by Trim Galore 0.6.4 with q 15 and then mapped with TopHat v 2.1.1 with parameters b2 very sensitive no coverage search and supplying the UCSC danRer10 refSeq gene annotation. Gene level read counts were obtained using the htseq count v1.6.1 by the reads with MAPQ greater than 30. Genome build: danRer10 Supplementary files format and content: raw counts of sequencing reads for the features of interest for RNAseq,whole fin,For fibroblast libraries triplicate Tgtph1b:creER;ubi:switch caudal fins were clipped and treated at 2dpa for 12 hours in 4uM Tamoxifen Sigma Aldritch Tornini et al. 2016. Fins were allowed to regenerate fully for two months and 75 fish fin samples were pooled for each biological replicate pool.,For RNA seq biological triplicate D. rerio caudal fin clip pools were collected at 0 dpa 1 dpa or 4 dpa time points via razor blade VWR from 15 fish aged between 3 month 12 month. Fin tissue was collected in Tri Reagent Sigma and isolated by ethanol precipitation. RNA was further purified with the RNA Clean & Concentrator Kit 5 Zymo. RNA seq libraries were prepared using a Stranded mRNA seq Kit KAPA.,D. rerio from the outbred Ekkwill EK strain ranging from 4 month to 12 month were used for whole fin library preparations Tgtph1b:mCherry NTR;ubi:switch fish were used for fibroblast library preparation Tornini et al 2016. Water temperature was maintained at 27.5°C and fish were kept on a 14/10 light/dark cycle. Fish were anesthetized in 0.75% v/v 2 phenoxyethanol Sigma Aldrich in fish water. Work with D. rerio was performed in accordance with Duke University guidelines.,date:0 dpa|tissue:whole fin,GSM4455081,GSM4455081: RNAseq; LEN deletion; 0dpa; uninjured; batch 3; rep1; Danio rerio; RNA Seq,GSM4455081,,1,For RNA seq biological triplicate D. rerio caudal fin clip pools were collected at 0 dpa 1 dpa or 4 dpa time points via razor blade VWR from 15 fish aged between 3 month 12 month. Fin tissue was collected in Tri Reagent Sigma and isolated by ethanol precipitation. RNA was further purified with the RNA Clean & Concentrator Kit 5 Zymo. RNA seq libraries were prepared using a Stranded mRNA seq Kit KAPA.,GEO Accession:GSM4455081,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,cDNA,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,Illumina HiSeq 4000,,SRP252754,,,JK-S7_S74_L008_R1_001.fastq.gz,fastq,2644840467.0,51859617.0,GSM4455081 r1,0:51 1:0,A:676588053;C:621109147;G:581574642;T:765307978;N:260647,51,0,,,676588053,621109147,581574642,765307978,260647,SRX8062810,SRS6431232,SRA1054723,GEO,"Poss, Cell Biology, Duke University",1,0.89598,,0.1281,,0.71417,,0.47147,,51,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,hiseq_era,unknown,cdna_unspecified,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,United States,2020-04-06,Multi-stage,Multi-stage,Fin,Surface Structure 58392,SRR11486778,SRX8062809,SRS6431231,SRP252754,PRJNA612515,Tissue Regeneration Enhancer Element Discovery by Chromatin Accessibility Profiling of Regenerating Zebrafish Fins,GSE146960,Other,Mammalian genomes likely encode all gene products required to regenerate an amputated limb yet they lack the correct instructions for strategically modulating those gene products to accomplish limb regeneration. Zebrafish and many other non mammalian vertebrates possess these instructions which exist as gene cis regulatory elements. Here to identify candidate tissue regeneration enhancer elements TREEs important for zebrafish fin regeneration we performed ATAC seq from bulk tissue or purified fibroblasts of uninjured and regenerating caudal fins. We identified thousands of DNA regions from each tissue type with dynamic accessibility during regeneration and assigned these regions to proximal genes with corresponding changes in RNA levels. To determine whether these profiles revealed bona fide TREEs we tested the sufficiency of several sequences in stable transgenic and mutant lines. These experiments identified new regulatory sequences near several induced and/or required genes including fgf20a cx43 and mdka with unique expression domains for each confirmed TREE. Deletion of TREE sequences from the zebrafish genome revealed requirements and redundancies surrounding cis regulatory regions. Our study generates a novel resource for dissecting the regulatory mechanisms of appendage regeneration. Overall design: Samples were enzymatically dissociated with Liberase and collected in biological triplicates for RNA and ATAC library preparation. Corresponding sample pools include: whole fin 0 dpa and whole fin 4 dpa whole fin 0 dpa and whole fin 1 dpa and fibroblast 0 dpa and fibroblast 4 dpa.,,pubmed:32665240,,RNAseq; whole fin; 0dpa; uninjured; batch 3; rep1,GSM4455080,,source name:whole fin|date:0 dpa|tissue:whole fin,RNAseq; whole fin; 0dpa; uninjured; batch 3; rep1,RNA Seq reads were trimmed by Trim Galore 0.6.4 with q 15 and then mapped with TopHat v 2.1.1 with parameters b2 very sensitive no coverage search and supplying the UCSC danRer10 refSeq gene annotation. Gene level read counts were obtained using the htseq count v1.6.1 by the reads with MAPQ greater than 30. Genome build: danRer10 Supplementary files format and content: raw counts of sequencing reads for the features of interest for RNAseq,whole fin,For fibroblast libraries triplicate Tgtph1b:creER;ubi:switch caudal fins were clipped and treated at 2dpa for 12 hours in 4uM Tamoxifen Sigma Aldritch Tornini et al. 2016. Fins were allowed to regenerate fully for two months and 75 fish fin samples were pooled for each biological replicate pool.,For RNA seq biological triplicate D. rerio caudal fin clip pools were collected at 0 dpa 1 dpa or 4 dpa time points via razor blade VWR from 15 fish aged between 3 month 12 month. Fin tissue was collected in Tri Reagent Sigma and isolated by ethanol precipitation. RNA was further purified with the RNA Clean & Concentrator Kit 5 Zymo. RNA seq libraries were prepared using a Stranded mRNA seq Kit KAPA.,D. rerio from the outbred Ekkwill EK strain ranging from 4 month to 12 month were used for whole fin library preparations Tgtph1b:mCherry NTR;ubi:switch fish were used for fibroblast library preparation Tornini et al 2016. Water temperature was maintained at 27.5°C and fish were kept on a 14/10 light/dark cycle. Fish were anesthetized in 0.75% v/v 2 phenoxyethanol Sigma Aldrich in fish water. Work with D. rerio was performed in accordance with Duke University guidelines.,date:0 dpa|tissue:whole fin,GSM4455080,GSM4455080: RNAseq; whole fin; 0dpa; uninjured; batch 3; rep1; Danio rerio; RNA Seq,GSM4455080,,1,For RNA seq biological triplicate D. rerio caudal fin clip pools were collected at 0 dpa 1 dpa or 4 dpa time points via razor blade VWR from 15 fish aged between 3 month 12 month. Fin tissue was collected in Tri Reagent Sigma and isolated by ethanol precipitation. RNA was further purified with the RNA Clean & Concentrator Kit 5 Zymo. RNA seq libraries were prepared using a Stranded mRNA seq Kit KAPA.,GEO Accession:GSM4455080,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,cDNA,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,Illumina HiSeq 4000,,SRP252754,,,JK-S5_S72_L008_R1_001.fastq.gz,fastq,2412481254.0,47303554.0,GSM4455080 r1,0:51 1:0,A:616219239;C:570826024;G:531833820;T:693353914;N:248257,51,0,,,616219239,570826024,531833820,693353914,248257,SRX8062809,SRS6431231,SRA1054723,GEO,"Poss, Cell Biology, Duke University",1,0.90059,,0.11572,,0.72013,,0.46152,,51,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,hiseq_era,unknown,cdna_unspecified,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,United States,2020-04-06,Multi-stage,Multi-stage,Fin,Surface Structure 58393,SRR11305419,SRX7910559,SRS6318068,SRP252754,PRJNA612515,Tissue Regeneration Enhancer Element Discovery by Chromatin Accessibility Profiling of Regenerating Zebrafish Fins,GSE146960,Other,Mammalian genomes likely encode all gene products required to regenerate an amputated limb yet they lack the correct instructions for strategically modulating those gene products to accomplish limb regeneration. Zebrafish and many other non mammalian vertebrates possess these instructions which exist as gene cis regulatory elements. Here to identify candidate tissue regeneration enhancer elements TREEs important for zebrafish fin regeneration we performed ATAC seq from bulk tissue or purified fibroblasts of uninjured and regenerating caudal fins. We identified thousands of DNA regions from each tissue type with dynamic accessibility during regeneration and assigned these regions to proximal genes with corresponding changes in RNA levels. To determine whether these profiles revealed bona fide TREEs we tested the sufficiency of several sequences in stable transgenic and mutant lines. These experiments identified new regulatory sequences near several induced and/or required genes including fgf20a cx43 and mdka with unique expression domains for each confirmed TREE. Deletion of TREE sequences from the zebrafish genome revealed requirements and redundancies surrounding cis regulatory regions. Our study generates a novel resource for dissecting the regulatory mechanisms of appendage regeneration. Overall design: Samples were enzymatically dissociated with Liberase and collected in biological triplicates for RNA and ATAC library preparation. Corresponding sample pools include: whole fin 0 dpa and whole fin 4 dpa whole fin 0 dpa and whole fin 1 dpa and fibroblast 0 dpa and fibroblast 4 dpa.,,pubmed:32665240,,RNAseq; Fibroblast; 4dpa; injured; batch 3; rep2,GSM4411419,,source name:RNAseq; Fibroblast; 4dpi; injured|time:4 dpa|tissue:fibroblast|genotype:wild type,RNAseq; Fibroblast; 4dpa; injured; batch 3; rep2,RNA Seq reads were trimmed by Trim Galore 0.6.4 with q 15 and then mapped with TopHat v 2.1.1 with parameters b2 very sensitive no coverage search and supplying the UCSC danRer10 refSeq gene annotation. Gene level read counts were obtained using the htseq count v1.6.1 by the reads with MAPQ greater than 30. ATAC Seq reads were trimmed by Trim Galore 0.4.1 with q 15 and then mapped with bowtie22.2.5 with parameters very sensitive to zebrafish genome UCSC danRer10 refSeq annotation. The mapped reads were filtered by MAPQ greater than 30 by samtools v 1.5 and duplicated reads were removed by picard v 1.91. Bigwig files were generated by kentUtils. Genome build: danRer10 Supplementary files format and content: raw counts of sequencing reads for the features of interest for RNAseq; bigwig files were generated using kentUtils by converting the output of macs2 bedgraph,RNAseq; Fibroblast; 4dpi; injured,For fibroblast libraries triplicate Tgtph1b:creER;ubi:switch caudal fins were clipped and treated at 2dpa for 12 hours in 4uM Tamoxifen Sigma Aldritch Tornini et al. 2016. Fins were allowed to regenerate fully for two months and 75 fish fin samples were pooled for each biological replicate pool.,For RNA seq biological triplicate D. rerio caudal fin clip pools were collected at 0 dpa 1 dpa or 4 dpa time points via razor blade VWR from 15 fish aged between 3 month 12 month. Homozygous evx1 knockout fish were used for evx1 knockout libraries. Fin tissue was collected in Tri Reagent Sigma and isolated by ethanol precipitation. RNA was further purified with the RNA Clean & Concentrator Kit 5 Zymo. For ATAC seq libraries biological triplicate D. rerio caudal fin clip pools were collected at 0 dpa 1 dpa or 4 dpa time points via razor blade VWR from 15 fish aged 3 month 12 month. Homozygous Evx1 knockout fish screened visually by jointless phenotype Borday et al. 2001 were used for Evx1 knockout libraries. Cells were dissociated using 1.18 U/mL Liberase DH Roche in Hank’s Balanced Salt Solution Gibco stirring at 37°C for 2 hours collected in 15 minute increments then strained through a 70 μm nylon cell strainer Corning. Samples were quantitated for 100K live cells using the Countess Automated Cell Counter Thermo Fisher Scientific.Fibroblast samples were sorted for 100K mCherry+ fluorescent cells on a B C Astrios cell sorter insead of quaitized for 100K live cells on a Contess SCell Conter. RNA seq libraries were prepared using a Stranded mRNA seq Kit KAPA. ATAC seq library preparation was performed as detailed in Buenrostro et al. 2013.,D. rerio from the outbred Ekkwill EK strain ranging from 4 month to 12 month were used for whole fin library preparations Tgtph1b:mCherry NTR;ubi:switch fish were used for fibroblast library preparation Tornini et al 2016 and homozygous evx1 knockout fish were used for evx1 libraries Schulte et al 2011. Water temperature was maintained at 27.5°C and fish were kept on a 14/10 light/dark cycle. Fish were anesthetized in 0.75% v/v 2 phenoxyethanol Sigma Aldrich in fish water. Work with D. rerio was performed in accordance with Duke University guidelines.,time:4 dpa|tissue:fibroblast|genotype:wild type,GSM4411419,GSM4411419: RNAseq; Fibroblast; 4dpa; injured; batch 3; rep2; Danio rerio; RNA Seq,GSM4411419,,1,For RNA seq biological triplicate D. rerio caudal fin clip pools were collected at 0 dpa 1 dpa or 4 dpa time points via razor blade VWR from 15 fish aged between 3 month 12 month. Homozygous evx1 knockout fish were used for evx1 knockout libraries. Fin tissue was collected in Tri Reagent Sigma and isolated by ethanol precipitation. RNA was further purified with the RNA Clean & Concentrator Kit 5 Zymo. For ATAC seq libraries biological triplicate D. rerio caudal fin clip pools were collected at 0 dpa 1 dpa or 4 dpa time points via razor blade VWR from 15 fish aged 3 month 12 month. Homozygous Evx1 knockout fish screened visually by jointless phenotype Borday et al. 2001 were used for Evx1 knockout libraries. Cells were dissociated using 1.18 U/mL Liberase DH Roche in Hank's Balanced Salt Solution Gibco stirring at 37°C for 2 hours collected in 15 minute increments then strained through a 70 μm nylon cell strainer Corning. Samples were quantitated for 100K live cells using the Countess Automated Cell Counter Thermo Fisher Scientific.Fibroblast samples were sorted for 100K mCherry+ fluorescent cells on a B C Astrios cell sorter insead of quaitized for 100K live cells on a Contess SCell Conter. RNA seq libraries were prepared using a Stranded mRNA seq Kit KAPA. ATAC seq library preparation was performed as detailed in Buenrostro et al. 2013.,GEO Accession:GSM4411419,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,cDNA,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,Illumina HiSeq 4000,,SRP252754,,,Fibro.RNAseq_injured_Regen_B2_S60_L008_R1_001.fastq.gz,fastq,3284939427.0,64410577.0,GSM4411419 r1,0:51 1:0,A:903305689;C:745606629;G:745227959;T:890156683;N:642467,51,0,,,903305689,745606629,745227959,890156683,642467,SRX7910559,SRS6318068,SRA1054723,GEO,"Poss, Cell Biology, Duke University",1,0.92145,,0.11147,,0.75091,,0.47874,,51,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,hiseq_era,unknown,cdna_unspecified,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,United States,2020-03-13,Multi-stage,Multi-stage,Fin,Surface Structure 58394,SRR11305418,SRX7910558,SRS6318067,SRP252754,PRJNA612515,Tissue Regeneration Enhancer Element Discovery by Chromatin Accessibility Profiling of Regenerating Zebrafish Fins,GSE146960,Other,Mammalian genomes likely encode all gene products required to regenerate an amputated limb yet they lack the correct instructions for strategically modulating those gene products to accomplish limb regeneration. Zebrafish and many other non mammalian vertebrates possess these instructions which exist as gene cis regulatory elements. Here to identify candidate tissue regeneration enhancer elements TREEs important for zebrafish fin regeneration we performed ATAC seq from bulk tissue or purified fibroblasts of uninjured and regenerating caudal fins. We identified thousands of DNA regions from each tissue type with dynamic accessibility during regeneration and assigned these regions to proximal genes with corresponding changes in RNA levels. To determine whether these profiles revealed bona fide TREEs we tested the sufficiency of several sequences in stable transgenic and mutant lines. These experiments identified new regulatory sequences near several induced and/or required genes including fgf20a cx43 and mdka with unique expression domains for each confirmed TREE. Deletion of TREE sequences from the zebrafish genome revealed requirements and redundancies surrounding cis regulatory regions. Our study generates a novel resource for dissecting the regulatory mechanisms of appendage regeneration. Overall design: Samples were enzymatically dissociated with Liberase and collected in biological triplicates for RNA and ATAC library preparation. Corresponding sample pools include: whole fin 0 dpa and whole fin 4 dpa whole fin 0 dpa and whole fin 1 dpa and fibroblast 0 dpa and fibroblast 4 dpa.,,pubmed:32665240,,RNAseq; Fibroblast; 4dpa; injured; batch 3; rep1,GSM4411418,,source name:RNAseq; Fibroblast; 4dpi; injured|time:4 dpa|tissue:fibroblast|genotype:wild type,RNAseq; Fibroblast; 4dpa; injured; batch 3; rep1,RNA Seq reads were trimmed by Trim Galore 0.6.4 with q 15 and then mapped with TopHat v 2.1.1 with parameters b2 very sensitive no coverage search and supplying the UCSC danRer10 refSeq gene annotation. Gene level read counts were obtained using the htseq count v1.6.1 by the reads with MAPQ greater than 30. ATAC Seq reads were trimmed by Trim Galore 0.4.1 with q 15 and then mapped with bowtie22.2.5 with parameters very sensitive to zebrafish genome UCSC danRer10 refSeq annotation. The mapped reads were filtered by MAPQ greater than 30 by samtools v 1.5 and duplicated reads were removed by picard v 1.91. Bigwig files were generated by kentUtils. Genome build: danRer10 Supplementary files format and content: raw counts of sequencing reads for the features of interest for RNAseq; bigwig files were generated using kentUtils by converting the output of macs2 bedgraph,RNAseq; Fibroblast; 4dpi; injured,For fibroblast libraries triplicate Tgtph1b:creER;ubi:switch caudal fins were clipped and treated at 2dpa for 12 hours in 4uM Tamoxifen Sigma Aldritch Tornini et al. 2016. Fins were allowed to regenerate fully for two months and 75 fish fin samples were pooled for each biological replicate pool.,For RNA seq biological triplicate D. rerio caudal fin clip pools were collected at 0 dpa 1 dpa or 4 dpa time points via razor blade VWR from 15 fish aged between 3 month 12 month. Homozygous evx1 knockout fish were used for evx1 knockout libraries. Fin tissue was collected in Tri Reagent Sigma and isolated by ethanol precipitation. RNA was further purified with the RNA Clean & Concentrator Kit 5 Zymo. For ATAC seq libraries biological triplicate D. rerio caudal fin clip pools were collected at 0 dpa 1 dpa or 4 dpa time points via razor blade VWR from 15 fish aged 3 month 12 month. Homozygous Evx1 knockout fish screened visually by jointless phenotype Borday et al. 2001 were used for Evx1 knockout libraries. Cells were dissociated using 1.18 U/mL Liberase DH Roche in Hank’s Balanced Salt Solution Gibco stirring at 37°C for 2 hours collected in 15 minute increments then strained through a 70 μm nylon cell strainer Corning. Samples were quantitated for 100K live cells using the Countess Automated Cell Counter Thermo Fisher Scientific.Fibroblast samples were sorted for 100K mCherry+ fluorescent cells on a B C Astrios cell sorter insead of quaitized for 100K live cells on a Contess SCell Conter. RNA seq libraries were prepared using a Stranded mRNA seq Kit KAPA. ATAC seq library preparation was performed as detailed in Buenrostro et al. 2013.,D. rerio from the outbred Ekkwill EK strain ranging from 4 month to 12 month were used for whole fin library preparations Tgtph1b:mCherry NTR;ubi:switch fish were used for fibroblast library preparation Tornini et al 2016 and homozygous evx1 knockout fish were used for evx1 libraries Schulte et al 2011. Water temperature was maintained at 27.5°C and fish were kept on a 14/10 light/dark cycle. Fish were anesthetized in 0.75% v/v 2 phenoxyethanol Sigma Aldrich in fish water. Work with D. rerio was performed in accordance with Duke University guidelines.,time:4 dpa|tissue:fibroblast|genotype:wild type,GSM4411418,GSM4411418: RNAseq; Fibroblast; 4dpa; injured; batch 3; rep1; Danio rerio; RNA Seq,GSM4411418,,1,For RNA seq biological triplicate D. rerio caudal fin clip pools were collected at 0 dpa 1 dpa or 4 dpa time points via razor blade VWR from 15 fish aged between 3 month 12 month. Homozygous evx1 knockout fish were used for evx1 knockout libraries. Fin tissue was collected in Tri Reagent Sigma and isolated by ethanol precipitation. RNA was further purified with the RNA Clean & Concentrator Kit 5 Zymo. For ATAC seq libraries biological triplicate D. rerio caudal fin clip pools were collected at 0 dpa 1 dpa or 4 dpa time points via razor blade VWR from 15 fish aged 3 month 12 month. Homozygous Evx1 knockout fish screened visually by jointless phenotype Borday et al. 2001 were used for Evx1 knockout libraries. Cells were dissociated using 1.18 U/mL Liberase DH Roche in Hank's Balanced Salt Solution Gibco stirring at 37°C for 2 hours collected in 15 minute increments then strained through a 70 μm nylon cell strainer Corning. Samples were quantitated for 100K live cells using the Countess Automated Cell Counter Thermo Fisher Scientific.Fibroblast samples were sorted for 100K mCherry+ fluorescent cells on a B C Astrios cell sorter insead of quaitized for 100K live cells on a Contess SCell Conter. RNA seq libraries were prepared using a Stranded mRNA seq Kit KAPA. ATAC seq library preparation was performed as detailed in Buenrostro et al. 2013.,GEO Accession:GSM4411418,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,cDNA,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,Illumina HiSeq 4000,,SRP252754,,,Fibro.RNAseq_injured_Regen_A2_S59_L008_R1_001.fastq.gz,fastq,3208227063.0,62906413.0,GSM4411418 r1,0:51 1:0,A:889970085;C:720088600;G:719685444;T:877865381;N:617553,51,0,,,889970085,720088600,719685444,877865381,617553,SRX7910558,SRS6318067,SRA1054723,GEO,"Poss, Cell Biology, Duke University",1,0.91814,,0.12108,,0.74704,,0.51875,,51,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,hiseq_era,unknown,cdna_unspecified,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,United States,2020-03-13,Multi-stage,Multi-stage,Fin,Surface Structure 58395,SRR11305417,SRX7910557,SRS6318066,SRP252754,PRJNA612515,Tissue Regeneration Enhancer Element Discovery by Chromatin Accessibility Profiling of Regenerating Zebrafish Fins,GSE146960,Other,Mammalian genomes likely encode all gene products required to regenerate an amputated limb yet they lack the correct instructions for strategically modulating those gene products to accomplish limb regeneration. Zebrafish and many other non mammalian vertebrates possess these instructions which exist as gene cis regulatory elements. Here to identify candidate tissue regeneration enhancer elements TREEs important for zebrafish fin regeneration we performed ATAC seq from bulk tissue or purified fibroblasts of uninjured and regenerating caudal fins. We identified thousands of DNA regions from each tissue type with dynamic accessibility during regeneration and assigned these regions to proximal genes with corresponding changes in RNA levels. To determine whether these profiles revealed bona fide TREEs we tested the sufficiency of several sequences in stable transgenic and mutant lines. These experiments identified new regulatory sequences near several induced and/or required genes including fgf20a cx43 and mdka with unique expression domains for each confirmed TREE. Deletion of TREE sequences from the zebrafish genome revealed requirements and redundancies surrounding cis regulatory regions. Our study generates a novel resource for dissecting the regulatory mechanisms of appendage regeneration. Overall design: Samples were enzymatically dissociated with Liberase and collected in biological triplicates for RNA and ATAC library preparation. Corresponding sample pools include: whole fin 0 dpa and whole fin 4 dpa whole fin 0 dpa and whole fin 1 dpa and fibroblast 0 dpa and fibroblast 4 dpa.,,pubmed:32665240,,RNAseq; Fibroblast; 0dpa; uninjured; batch 3; rep2,GSM4411417,,source name:RNAseq; Fibroblast; 0dpi; uninjured|time:0 dpa|tissue:fibroblast|genotype:wild type,RNAseq; Fibroblast; 0dpa; uninjured; batch 3; rep2,RNA Seq reads were trimmed by Trim Galore 0.6.4 with q 15 and then mapped with TopHat v 2.1.1 with parameters b2 very sensitive no coverage search and supplying the UCSC danRer10 refSeq gene annotation. Gene level read counts were obtained using the htseq count v1.6.1 by the reads with MAPQ greater than 30. ATAC Seq reads were trimmed by Trim Galore 0.4.1 with q 15 and then mapped with bowtie22.2.5 with parameters very sensitive to zebrafish genome UCSC danRer10 refSeq annotation. The mapped reads were filtered by MAPQ greater than 30 by samtools v 1.5 and duplicated reads were removed by picard v 1.91. Bigwig files were generated by kentUtils. Genome build: danRer10 Supplementary files format and content: raw counts of sequencing reads for the features of interest for RNAseq; bigwig files were generated using kentUtils by converting the output of macs2 bedgraph,RNAseq; Fibroblast; 0dpi; uninjured,For fibroblast libraries triplicate Tgtph1b:creER;ubi:switch caudal fins were clipped and treated at 2dpa for 12 hours in 4uM Tamoxifen Sigma Aldritch Tornini et al. 2016. Fins were allowed to regenerate fully for two months and 75 fish fin samples were pooled for each biological replicate pool.,For RNA seq biological triplicate D. rerio caudal fin clip pools were collected at 0 dpa 1 dpa or 4 dpa time points via razor blade VWR from 15 fish aged between 3 month 12 month. Homozygous evx1 knockout fish were used for evx1 knockout libraries. Fin tissue was collected in Tri Reagent Sigma and isolated by ethanol precipitation. RNA was further purified with the RNA Clean & Concentrator Kit 5 Zymo. For ATAC seq libraries biological triplicate D. rerio caudal fin clip pools were collected at 0 dpa 1 dpa or 4 dpa time points via razor blade VWR from 15 fish aged 3 month 12 month. Homozygous Evx1 knockout fish screened visually by jointless phenotype Borday et al. 2001 were used for Evx1 knockout libraries. Cells were dissociated using 1.18 U/mL Liberase DH Roche in Hank’s Balanced Salt Solution Gibco stirring at 37°C for 2 hours collected in 15 minute increments then strained through a 70 μm nylon cell strainer Corning. Samples were quantitated for 100K live cells using the Countess Automated Cell Counter Thermo Fisher Scientific.Fibroblast samples were sorted for 100K mCherry+ fluorescent cells on a B C Astrios cell sorter insead of quaitized for 100K live cells on a Contess SCell Conter. RNA seq libraries were prepared using a Stranded mRNA seq Kit KAPA. ATAC seq library preparation was performed as detailed in Buenrostro et al. 2013.,D. rerio from the outbred Ekkwill EK strain ranging from 4 month to 12 month were used for whole fin library preparations Tgtph1b:mCherry NTR;ubi:switch fish were used for fibroblast library preparation Tornini et al 2016 and homozygous evx1 knockout fish were used for evx1 libraries Schulte et al 2011. Water temperature was maintained at 27.5°C and fish were kept on a 14/10 light/dark cycle. Fish were anesthetized in 0.75% v/v 2 phenoxyethanol Sigma Aldrich in fish water. Work with D. rerio was performed in accordance with Duke University guidelines.,time:0 dpa|tissue:fibroblast|genotype:wild type,GSM4411417,GSM4411417: RNAseq; Fibroblast; 0dpa; uninjured; batch 3; rep2; Danio rerio; RNA Seq,GSM4411417,,1,For RNA seq biological triplicate D. rerio caudal fin clip pools were collected at 0 dpa 1 dpa or 4 dpa time points via razor blade VWR from 15 fish aged between 3 month 12 month. Homozygous evx1 knockout fish were used for evx1 knockout libraries. Fin tissue was collected in Tri Reagent Sigma and isolated by ethanol precipitation. RNA was further purified with the RNA Clean & Concentrator Kit 5 Zymo. For ATAC seq libraries biological triplicate D. rerio caudal fin clip pools were collected at 0 dpa 1 dpa or 4 dpa time points via razor blade VWR from 15 fish aged 3 month 12 month. Homozygous Evx1 knockout fish screened visually by jointless phenotype Borday et al. 2001 were used for Evx1 knockout libraries. Cells were dissociated using 1.18 U/mL Liberase DH Roche in Hank's Balanced Salt Solution Gibco stirring at 37°C for 2 hours collected in 15 minute increments then strained through a 70 μm nylon cell strainer Corning. Samples were quantitated for 100K live cells using the Countess Automated Cell Counter Thermo Fisher Scientific.Fibroblast samples were sorted for 100K mCherry+ fluorescent cells on a B C Astrios cell sorter insead of quaitized for 100K live cells on a Contess SCell Conter. RNA seq libraries were prepared using a Stranded mRNA seq Kit KAPA. ATAC seq library preparation was performed as detailed in Buenrostro et al. 2013.,GEO Accession:GSM4411417,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,cDNA,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,Illumina HiSeq 4000,,SRP252754,,,Fibro.RNAseq_uninjured_Uninj_B2_S58_L008_R1_001.fastq.gz,fastq,3779977251.0,74117201.0,GSM4411417 r1,0:51 1:0,A:1036587583;C:863955138;G:859693317;T:1019029136;N:712077,51,0,,,1036587583,863955138,859693317,1019029136,712077,SRX7910557,SRS6318066,SRA1054723,GEO,"Poss, Cell Biology, Duke University",1,0.91762,,0.12285,,0.7683,,0.47877,,51,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,hiseq_era,unknown,cdna_unspecified,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,United States,2020-03-13,Multi-stage,Multi-stage,Fin,Surface Structure 58396,SRR11305416,SRX7910556,SRS6318065,SRP252754,PRJNA612515,Tissue Regeneration Enhancer Element Discovery by Chromatin Accessibility Profiling of Regenerating Zebrafish Fins,GSE146960,Other,Mammalian genomes likely encode all gene products required to regenerate an amputated limb yet they lack the correct instructions for strategically modulating those gene products to accomplish limb regeneration. Zebrafish and many other non mammalian vertebrates possess these instructions which exist as gene cis regulatory elements. Here to identify candidate tissue regeneration enhancer elements TREEs important for zebrafish fin regeneration we performed ATAC seq from bulk tissue or purified fibroblasts of uninjured and regenerating caudal fins. We identified thousands of DNA regions from each tissue type with dynamic accessibility during regeneration and assigned these regions to proximal genes with corresponding changes in RNA levels. To determine whether these profiles revealed bona fide TREEs we tested the sufficiency of several sequences in stable transgenic and mutant lines. These experiments identified new regulatory sequences near several induced and/or required genes including fgf20a cx43 and mdka with unique expression domains for each confirmed TREE. Deletion of TREE sequences from the zebrafish genome revealed requirements and redundancies surrounding cis regulatory regions. Our study generates a novel resource for dissecting the regulatory mechanisms of appendage regeneration. Overall design: Samples were enzymatically dissociated with Liberase and collected in biological triplicates for RNA and ATAC library preparation. Corresponding sample pools include: whole fin 0 dpa and whole fin 4 dpa whole fin 0 dpa and whole fin 1 dpa and fibroblast 0 dpa and fibroblast 4 dpa.,,pubmed:32665240,,RNAseq; Fibroblast; 0dpa; uninjured; batch 3; rep1,GSM4411416,,source name:RNAseq; Fibroblast; 0dpi; uninjured|time:0 dpa|tissue:fibroblast|genotype:wild type,RNAseq; Fibroblast; 0dpa; uninjured; batch 3; rep1,RNA Seq reads were trimmed by Trim Galore 0.6.4 with q 15 and then mapped with TopHat v 2.1.1 with parameters b2 very sensitive no coverage search and supplying the UCSC danRer10 refSeq gene annotation. Gene level read counts were obtained using the htseq count v1.6.1 by the reads with MAPQ greater than 30. ATAC Seq reads were trimmed by Trim Galore 0.4.1 with q 15 and then mapped with bowtie22.2.5 with parameters very sensitive to zebrafish genome UCSC danRer10 refSeq annotation. The mapped reads were filtered by MAPQ greater than 30 by samtools v 1.5 and duplicated reads were removed by picard v 1.91. Bigwig files were generated by kentUtils. Genome build: danRer10 Supplementary files format and content: raw counts of sequencing reads for the features of interest for RNAseq; bigwig files were generated using kentUtils by converting the output of macs2 bedgraph,RNAseq; Fibroblast; 0dpi; uninjured,For fibroblast libraries triplicate Tgtph1b:creER;ubi:switch caudal fins were clipped and treated at 2dpa for 12 hours in 4uM Tamoxifen Sigma Aldritch Tornini et al. 2016. Fins were allowed to regenerate fully for two months and 75 fish fin samples were pooled for each biological replicate pool.,For RNA seq biological triplicate D. rerio caudal fin clip pools were collected at 0 dpa 1 dpa or 4 dpa time points via razor blade VWR from 15 fish aged between 3 month 12 month. Homozygous evx1 knockout fish were used for evx1 knockout libraries. Fin tissue was collected in Tri Reagent Sigma and isolated by ethanol precipitation. RNA was further purified with the RNA Clean & Concentrator Kit 5 Zymo. For ATAC seq libraries biological triplicate D. rerio caudal fin clip pools were collected at 0 dpa 1 dpa or 4 dpa time points via razor blade VWR from 15 fish aged 3 month 12 month. Homozygous Evx1 knockout fish screened visually by jointless phenotype Borday et al. 2001 were used for Evx1 knockout libraries. Cells were dissociated using 1.18 U/mL Liberase DH Roche in Hank’s Balanced Salt Solution Gibco stirring at 37°C for 2 hours collected in 15 minute increments then strained through a 70 μm nylon cell strainer Corning. Samples were quantitated for 100K live cells using the Countess Automated Cell Counter Thermo Fisher Scientific.Fibroblast samples were sorted for 100K mCherry+ fluorescent cells on a B C Astrios cell sorter insead of quaitized for 100K live cells on a Contess SCell Conter. RNA seq libraries were prepared using a Stranded mRNA seq Kit KAPA. ATAC seq library preparation was performed as detailed in Buenrostro et al. 2013.,D. rerio from the outbred Ekkwill EK strain ranging from 4 month to 12 month were used for whole fin library preparations Tgtph1b:mCherry NTR;ubi:switch fish were used for fibroblast library preparation Tornini et al 2016 and homozygous evx1 knockout fish were used for evx1 libraries Schulte et al 2011. Water temperature was maintained at 27.5°C and fish were kept on a 14/10 light/dark cycle. Fish were anesthetized in 0.75% v/v 2 phenoxyethanol Sigma Aldrich in fish water. Work with D. rerio was performed in accordance with Duke University guidelines.,time:0 dpa|tissue:fibroblast|genotype:wild type,GSM4411416,GSM4411416: RNAseq; Fibroblast; 0dpa; uninjured; batch 3; rep1; Danio rerio; RNA Seq,GSM4411416,,1,For RNA seq biological triplicate D. rerio caudal fin clip pools were collected at 0 dpa 1 dpa or 4 dpa time points via razor blade VWR from 15 fish aged between 3 month 12 month. Homozygous evx1 knockout fish were used for evx1 knockout libraries. Fin tissue was collected in Tri Reagent Sigma and isolated by ethanol precipitation. RNA was further purified with the RNA Clean & Concentrator Kit 5 Zymo. For ATAC seq libraries biological triplicate D. rerio caudal fin clip pools were collected at 0 dpa 1 dpa or 4 dpa time points via razor blade VWR from 15 fish aged 3 month 12 month. Homozygous Evx1 knockout fish screened visually by jointless phenotype Borday et al. 2001 were used for Evx1 knockout libraries. Cells were dissociated using 1.18 U/mL Liberase DH Roche in Hank's Balanced Salt Solution Gibco stirring at 37°C for 2 hours collected in 15 minute increments then strained through a 70 μm nylon cell strainer Corning. Samples were quantitated for 100K live cells using the Countess Automated Cell Counter Thermo Fisher Scientific.Fibroblast samples were sorted for 100K mCherry+ fluorescent cells on a B C Astrios cell sorter insead of quaitized for 100K live cells on a Contess SCell Conter. RNA seq libraries were prepared using a Stranded mRNA seq Kit KAPA. ATAC seq library preparation was performed as detailed in Buenrostro et al. 2013.,GEO Accession:GSM4411416,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,cDNA,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,Illumina HiSeq 4000,,SRP252754,,,Fibro.RNAseq_uninjured_Uninj_A2_S57_L008_R1_001.fastq.gz,fastq,3830264271.0,75103221.0,GSM4411416 r1,0:51 1:0,A:1040171853;C:881400891;G:878214685;T:1029746894;N:729948,51,0,,,1040171853,881400891,878214685,1029746894,729948,SRX7910556,SRS6318065,SRA1054723,GEO,"Poss, Cell Biology, Duke University",1,0.92032,,0.09358,,0.75771,,0.4712,,51,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,hiseq_era,unknown,cdna_unspecified,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,United States,2020-03-13,Multi-stage,Multi-stage,Fin,Surface Structure 58397,SRR11305415,SRX7910555,SRS6318064,SRP252754,PRJNA612515,Tissue Regeneration Enhancer Element Discovery by Chromatin Accessibility Profiling of Regenerating Zebrafish Fins,GSE146960,Other,Mammalian genomes likely encode all gene products required to regenerate an amputated limb yet they lack the correct instructions for strategically modulating those gene products to accomplish limb regeneration. Zebrafish and many other non mammalian vertebrates possess these instructions which exist as gene cis regulatory elements. Here to identify candidate tissue regeneration enhancer elements TREEs important for zebrafish fin regeneration we performed ATAC seq from bulk tissue or purified fibroblasts of uninjured and regenerating caudal fins. We identified thousands of DNA regions from each tissue type with dynamic accessibility during regeneration and assigned these regions to proximal genes with corresponding changes in RNA levels. To determine whether these profiles revealed bona fide TREEs we tested the sufficiency of several sequences in stable transgenic and mutant lines. These experiments identified new regulatory sequences near several induced and/or required genes including fgf20a cx43 and mdka with unique expression domains for each confirmed TREE. Deletion of TREE sequences from the zebrafish genome revealed requirements and redundancies surrounding cis regulatory regions. Our study generates a novel resource for dissecting the regulatory mechanisms of appendage regeneration. Overall design: Samples were enzymatically dissociated with Liberase and collected in biological triplicates for RNA and ATAC library preparation. Corresponding sample pools include: whole fin 0 dpa and whole fin 4 dpa whole fin 0 dpa and whole fin 1 dpa and fibroblast 0 dpa and fibroblast 4 dpa.,,pubmed:32665240,,RNAseq; whole fin; 1dpa; injured; batch 2; rep3,GSM4411415,,source name:RNAseq; whole fin; 1dpi; injured|time:1 dpa|tissue:whole fin|genotype:wild type,RNAseq; whole fin; 1dpa; injured; batch 2; rep3,RNA Seq reads were trimmed by Trim Galore 0.6.4 with q 15 and then mapped with TopHat v 2.1.1 with parameters b2 very sensitive no coverage search and supplying the UCSC danRer10 refSeq gene annotation. Gene level read counts were obtained using the htseq count v1.6.1 by the reads with MAPQ greater than 30. ATAC Seq reads were trimmed by Trim Galore 0.4.1 with q 15 and then mapped with bowtie22.2.5 with parameters very sensitive to zebrafish genome UCSC danRer10 refSeq annotation. The mapped reads were filtered by MAPQ greater than 30 by samtools v 1.5 and duplicated reads were removed by picard v 1.91. Bigwig files were generated by kentUtils. Genome build: danRer10 Supplementary files format and content: raw counts of sequencing reads for the features of interest for RNAseq; bigwig files were generated using kentUtils by converting the output of macs2 bedgraph,RNAseq; whole fin; 1dpi; injured,For fibroblast libraries triplicate Tgtph1b:creER;ubi:switch caudal fins were clipped and treated at 2dpa for 12 hours in 4uM Tamoxifen Sigma Aldritch Tornini et al. 2016. Fins were allowed to regenerate fully for two months and 75 fish fin samples were pooled for each biological replicate pool.,For RNA seq biological triplicate D. rerio caudal fin clip pools were collected at 0 dpa 1 dpa or 4 dpa time points via razor blade VWR from 15 fish aged between 3 month 12 month. Homozygous evx1 knockout fish were used for evx1 knockout libraries. Fin tissue was collected in Tri Reagent Sigma and isolated by ethanol precipitation. RNA was further purified with the RNA Clean & Concentrator Kit 5 Zymo. For ATAC seq libraries biological triplicate D. rerio caudal fin clip pools were collected at 0 dpa 1 dpa or 4 dpa time points via razor blade VWR from 15 fish aged 3 month 12 month. Homozygous Evx1 knockout fish screened visually by jointless phenotype Borday et al. 2001 were used for Evx1 knockout libraries. Cells were dissociated using 1.18 U/mL Liberase DH Roche in Hank’s Balanced Salt Solution Gibco stirring at 37°C for 2 hours collected in 15 minute increments then strained through a 70 μm nylon cell strainer Corning. Samples were quantitated for 100K live cells using the Countess Automated Cell Counter Thermo Fisher Scientific.Fibroblast samples were sorted for 100K mCherry+ fluorescent cells on a B C Astrios cell sorter insead of quaitized for 100K live cells on a Contess SCell Conter. RNA seq libraries were prepared using a Stranded mRNA seq Kit KAPA. ATAC seq library preparation was performed as detailed in Buenrostro et al. 2013.,D. rerio from the outbred Ekkwill EK strain ranging from 4 month to 12 month were used for whole fin library preparations Tgtph1b:mCherry NTR;ubi:switch fish were used for fibroblast library preparation Tornini et al 2016 and homozygous evx1 knockout fish were used for evx1 libraries Schulte et al 2011. Water temperature was maintained at 27.5°C and fish were kept on a 14/10 light/dark cycle. Fish were anesthetized in 0.75% v/v 2 phenoxyethanol Sigma Aldrich in fish water. Work with D. rerio was performed in accordance with Duke University guidelines.,time:1 dpa|tissue:whole fin|genotype:wild type,GSM4411415,GSM4411415: RNAseq; whole fin; 1dpa; injured; batch 2; rep3; Danio rerio; RNA Seq,GSM4411415,,1,For RNA seq biological triplicate D. rerio caudal fin clip pools were collected at 0 dpa 1 dpa or 4 dpa time points via razor blade VWR from 15 fish aged between 3 month 12 month. Homozygous evx1 knockout fish were used for evx1 knockout libraries. Fin tissue was collected in Tri Reagent Sigma and isolated by ethanol precipitation. RNA was further purified with the RNA Clean & Concentrator Kit 5 Zymo. For ATAC seq libraries biological triplicate D. rerio caudal fin clip pools were collected at 0 dpa 1 dpa or 4 dpa time points via razor blade VWR from 15 fish aged 3 month 12 month. Homozygous Evx1 knockout fish screened visually by jointless phenotype Borday et al. 2001 were used for Evx1 knockout libraries. Cells were dissociated using 1.18 U/mL Liberase DH Roche in Hank's Balanced Salt Solution Gibco stirring at 37°C for 2 hours collected in 15 minute increments then strained through a 70 μm nylon cell strainer Corning. Samples were quantitated for 100K live cells using the Countess Automated Cell Counter Thermo Fisher Scientific.Fibroblast samples were sorted for 100K mCherry+ fluorescent cells on a B C Astrios cell sorter insead of quaitized for 100K live cells on a Contess SCell Conter. RNA seq libraries were prepared using a Stranded mRNA seq Kit KAPA. ATAC seq library preparation was performed as detailed in Buenrostro et al. 2013.,GEO Accession:GSM4411415,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,cDNA,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,Illumina HiSeq 4000,,SRP252754,,,WFin1dpi.RNAseq_injured_RNA_1dpa_A_S37_L004_R1_001.fastq.gz,fastq,2924051085.0,57334335.0,GSM4411415 r1,0:51 1:0,A:678403251;C:734140605;G:692166374;T:819274692;N:66163,51,0,,,678403251,734140605,692166374,819274692,66163,SRX7910555,SRS6318064,SRA1054723,GEO,"Poss, Cell Biology, Duke University",1,0.93427,,0.06589,,0.73866,,0.45737,,51,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,hiseq_era,unknown,cdna_unspecified,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,United States,2020-03-13,Multi-stage,Multi-stage,Fin,Surface Structure 58398,SRR11305414,SRX7910554,SRS6318063,SRP252754,PRJNA612515,Tissue Regeneration Enhancer Element Discovery by Chromatin Accessibility Profiling of Regenerating Zebrafish Fins,GSE146960,Other,Mammalian genomes likely encode all gene products required to regenerate an amputated limb yet they lack the correct instructions for strategically modulating those gene products to accomplish limb regeneration. Zebrafish and many other non mammalian vertebrates possess these instructions which exist as gene cis regulatory elements. Here to identify candidate tissue regeneration enhancer elements TREEs important for zebrafish fin regeneration we performed ATAC seq from bulk tissue or purified fibroblasts of uninjured and regenerating caudal fins. We identified thousands of DNA regions from each tissue type with dynamic accessibility during regeneration and assigned these regions to proximal genes with corresponding changes in RNA levels. To determine whether these profiles revealed bona fide TREEs we tested the sufficiency of several sequences in stable transgenic and mutant lines. These experiments identified new regulatory sequences near several induced and/or required genes including fgf20a cx43 and mdka with unique expression domains for each confirmed TREE. Deletion of TREE sequences from the zebrafish genome revealed requirements and redundancies surrounding cis regulatory regions. Our study generates a novel resource for dissecting the regulatory mechanisms of appendage regeneration. Overall design: Samples were enzymatically dissociated with Liberase and collected in biological triplicates for RNA and ATAC library preparation. Corresponding sample pools include: whole fin 0 dpa and whole fin 4 dpa whole fin 0 dpa and whole fin 1 dpa and fibroblast 0 dpa and fibroblast 4 dpa.,,pubmed:32665240,,RNAseq; whole fin; 1dpa; injured; batch 2; rep2,GSM4411414,,source name:RNAseq; whole fin; 1dpi; injured|time:1 dpa|tissue:whole fin|genotype:wild type,RNAseq; whole fin; 1dpa; injured; batch 2; rep2,RNA Seq reads were trimmed by Trim Galore 0.6.4 with q 15 and then mapped with TopHat v 2.1.1 with parameters b2 very sensitive no coverage search and supplying the UCSC danRer10 refSeq gene annotation. Gene level read counts were obtained using the htseq count v1.6.1 by the reads with MAPQ greater than 30. ATAC Seq reads were trimmed by Trim Galore 0.4.1 with q 15 and then mapped with bowtie22.2.5 with parameters very sensitive to zebrafish genome UCSC danRer10 refSeq annotation. The mapped reads were filtered by MAPQ greater than 30 by samtools v 1.5 and duplicated reads were removed by picard v 1.91. Bigwig files were generated by kentUtils. Genome build: danRer10 Supplementary files format and content: raw counts of sequencing reads for the features of interest for RNAseq; bigwig files were generated using kentUtils by converting the output of macs2 bedgraph,RNAseq; whole fin; 1dpi; injured,For fibroblast libraries triplicate Tgtph1b:creER;ubi:switch caudal fins were clipped and treated at 2dpa for 12 hours in 4uM Tamoxifen Sigma Aldritch Tornini et al. 2016. Fins were allowed to regenerate fully for two months and 75 fish fin samples were pooled for each biological replicate pool.,For RNA seq biological triplicate D. rerio caudal fin clip pools were collected at 0 dpa 1 dpa or 4 dpa time points via razor blade VWR from 15 fish aged between 3 month 12 month. Homozygous evx1 knockout fish were used for evx1 knockout libraries. Fin tissue was collected in Tri Reagent Sigma and isolated by ethanol precipitation. RNA was further purified with the RNA Clean & Concentrator Kit 5 Zymo. For ATAC seq libraries biological triplicate D. rerio caudal fin clip pools were collected at 0 dpa 1 dpa or 4 dpa time points via razor blade VWR from 15 fish aged 3 month 12 month. Homozygous Evx1 knockout fish screened visually by jointless phenotype Borday et al. 2001 were used for Evx1 knockout libraries. Cells were dissociated using 1.18 U/mL Liberase DH Roche in Hank’s Balanced Salt Solution Gibco stirring at 37°C for 2 hours collected in 15 minute increments then strained through a 70 μm nylon cell strainer Corning. Samples were quantitated for 100K live cells using the Countess Automated Cell Counter Thermo Fisher Scientific.Fibroblast samples were sorted for 100K mCherry+ fluorescent cells on a B C Astrios cell sorter insead of quaitized for 100K live cells on a Contess SCell Conter. RNA seq libraries were prepared using a Stranded mRNA seq Kit KAPA. ATAC seq library preparation was performed as detailed in Buenrostro et al. 2013.,D. rerio from the outbred Ekkwill EK strain ranging from 4 month to 12 month were used for whole fin library preparations Tgtph1b:mCherry NTR;ubi:switch fish were used for fibroblast library preparation Tornini et al 2016 and homozygous evx1 knockout fish were used for evx1 libraries Schulte et al 2011. Water temperature was maintained at 27.5°C and fish were kept on a 14/10 light/dark cycle. Fish were anesthetized in 0.75% v/v 2 phenoxyethanol Sigma Aldrich in fish water. Work with D. rerio was performed in accordance with Duke University guidelines.,time:1 dpa|tissue:whole fin|genotype:wild type,GSM4411414,GSM4411414: RNAseq; whole fin; 1dpa; injured; batch 2; rep2; Danio rerio; RNA Seq,GSM4411414,,1,For RNA seq biological triplicate D. rerio caudal fin clip pools were collected at 0 dpa 1 dpa or 4 dpa time points via razor blade VWR from 15 fish aged between 3 month 12 month. Homozygous evx1 knockout fish were used for evx1 knockout libraries. Fin tissue was collected in Tri Reagent Sigma and isolated by ethanol precipitation. RNA was further purified with the RNA Clean & Concentrator Kit 5 Zymo. For ATAC seq libraries biological triplicate D. rerio caudal fin clip pools were collected at 0 dpa 1 dpa or 4 dpa time points via razor blade VWR from 15 fish aged 3 month 12 month. Homozygous Evx1 knockout fish screened visually by jointless phenotype Borday et al. 2001 were used for Evx1 knockout libraries. Cells were dissociated using 1.18 U/mL Liberase DH Roche in Hank's Balanced Salt Solution Gibco stirring at 37°C for 2 hours collected in 15 minute increments then strained through a 70 μm nylon cell strainer Corning. Samples were quantitated for 100K live cells using the Countess Automated Cell Counter Thermo Fisher Scientific.Fibroblast samples were sorted for 100K mCherry+ fluorescent cells on a B C Astrios cell sorter insead of quaitized for 100K live cells on a Contess SCell Conter. RNA seq libraries were prepared using a Stranded mRNA seq Kit KAPA. ATAC seq library preparation was performed as detailed in Buenrostro et al. 2013.,GEO Accession:GSM4411414,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,cDNA,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,Illumina HiSeq 4000,,SRP252754,,,WFin1dpi.RNAseq_injured_RNA_1dpa_B_S38_L004_R1_001.fastq.gz,fastq,3159176895.0,61944645.0,GSM4411414 r1,0:51 1:0,A:730026525;C:803379127;G:747179794;T:878521357;N:70092,51,0,,,730026525,803379127,747179794,878521357,70092,SRX7910554,SRS6318063,SRA1054723,GEO,"Poss, Cell Biology, Duke University",1,0.93516,,0.07492,,0.74602,,0.46646,,51,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,hiseq_era,unknown,cdna_unspecified,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,United States,2020-03-13,Multi-stage,Multi-stage,Fin,Surface Structure 58399,SRR11305413,SRX7910553,SRS6318062,SRP252754,PRJNA612515,Tissue Regeneration Enhancer Element Discovery by Chromatin Accessibility Profiling of Regenerating Zebrafish Fins,GSE146960,Other,Mammalian genomes likely encode all gene products required to regenerate an amputated limb yet they lack the correct instructions for strategically modulating those gene products to accomplish limb regeneration. Zebrafish and many other non mammalian vertebrates possess these instructions which exist as gene cis regulatory elements. Here to identify candidate tissue regeneration enhancer elements TREEs important for zebrafish fin regeneration we performed ATAC seq from bulk tissue or purified fibroblasts of uninjured and regenerating caudal fins. We identified thousands of DNA regions from each tissue type with dynamic accessibility during regeneration and assigned these regions to proximal genes with corresponding changes in RNA levels. To determine whether these profiles revealed bona fide TREEs we tested the sufficiency of several sequences in stable transgenic and mutant lines. These experiments identified new regulatory sequences near several induced and/or required genes including fgf20a cx43 and mdka with unique expression domains for each confirmed TREE. Deletion of TREE sequences from the zebrafish genome revealed requirements and redundancies surrounding cis regulatory regions. Our study generates a novel resource for dissecting the regulatory mechanisms of appendage regeneration. Overall design: Samples were enzymatically dissociated with Liberase and collected in biological triplicates for RNA and ATAC library preparation. Corresponding sample pools include: whole fin 0 dpa and whole fin 4 dpa whole fin 0 dpa and whole fin 1 dpa and fibroblast 0 dpa and fibroblast 4 dpa.,,pubmed:32665240,,RNAseq; whole fin; 1dpa; injured; batch 2; rep1,GSM4411413,,source name:RNAseq; whole fin; 1dpi; injured|time:1 dpa|tissue:whole fin|genotype:wild type,RNAseq; whole fin; 1dpa; injured; batch 2; rep1,RNA Seq reads were trimmed by Trim Galore 0.6.4 with q 15 and then mapped with TopHat v 2.1.1 with parameters b2 very sensitive no coverage search and supplying the UCSC danRer10 refSeq gene annotation. Gene level read counts were obtained using the htseq count v1.6.1 by the reads with MAPQ greater than 30. ATAC Seq reads were trimmed by Trim Galore 0.4.1 with q 15 and then mapped with bowtie22.2.5 with parameters very sensitive to zebrafish genome UCSC danRer10 refSeq annotation. The mapped reads were filtered by MAPQ greater than 30 by samtools v 1.5 and duplicated reads were removed by picard v 1.91. Bigwig files were generated by kentUtils. Genome build: danRer10 Supplementary files format and content: raw counts of sequencing reads for the features of interest for RNAseq; bigwig files were generated using kentUtils by converting the output of macs2 bedgraph,RNAseq; whole fin; 1dpi; injured,For fibroblast libraries triplicate Tgtph1b:creER;ubi:switch caudal fins were clipped and treated at 2dpa for 12 hours in 4uM Tamoxifen Sigma Aldritch Tornini et al. 2016. Fins were allowed to regenerate fully for two months and 75 fish fin samples were pooled for each biological replicate pool.,For RNA seq biological triplicate D. rerio caudal fin clip pools were collected at 0 dpa 1 dpa or 4 dpa time points via razor blade VWR from 15 fish aged between 3 month 12 month. Homozygous evx1 knockout fish were used for evx1 knockout libraries. Fin tissue was collected in Tri Reagent Sigma and isolated by ethanol precipitation. RNA was further purified with the RNA Clean & Concentrator Kit 5 Zymo. For ATAC seq libraries biological triplicate D. rerio caudal fin clip pools were collected at 0 dpa 1 dpa or 4 dpa time points via razor blade VWR from 15 fish aged 3 month 12 month. Homozygous Evx1 knockout fish screened visually by jointless phenotype Borday et al. 2001 were used for Evx1 knockout libraries. Cells were dissociated using 1.18 U/mL Liberase DH Roche in Hank’s Balanced Salt Solution Gibco stirring at 37°C for 2 hours collected in 15 minute increments then strained through a 70 μm nylon cell strainer Corning. Samples were quantitated for 100K live cells using the Countess Automated Cell Counter Thermo Fisher Scientific.Fibroblast samples were sorted for 100K mCherry+ fluorescent cells on a B C Astrios cell sorter insead of quaitized for 100K live cells on a Contess SCell Conter. RNA seq libraries were prepared using a Stranded mRNA seq Kit KAPA. ATAC seq library preparation was performed as detailed in Buenrostro et al. 2013.,D. rerio from the outbred Ekkwill EK strain ranging from 4 month to 12 month were used for whole fin library preparations Tgtph1b:mCherry NTR;ubi:switch fish were used for fibroblast library preparation Tornini et al 2016 and homozygous evx1 knockout fish were used for evx1 libraries Schulte et al 2011. Water temperature was maintained at 27.5°C and fish were kept on a 14/10 light/dark cycle. Fish were anesthetized in 0.75% v/v 2 phenoxyethanol Sigma Aldrich in fish water. Work with D. rerio was performed in accordance with Duke University guidelines.,time:1 dpa|tissue:whole fin|genotype:wild type,GSM4411413,GSM4411413: RNAseq; whole fin; 1dpa; injured; batch 2; rep1; Danio rerio; RNA Seq,GSM4411413,,1,For RNA seq biological triplicate D. rerio caudal fin clip pools were collected at 0 dpa 1 dpa or 4 dpa time points via razor blade VWR from 15 fish aged between 3 month 12 month. Homozygous evx1 knockout fish were used for evx1 knockout libraries. Fin tissue was collected in Tri Reagent Sigma and isolated by ethanol precipitation. RNA was further purified with the RNA Clean & Concentrator Kit 5 Zymo. For ATAC seq libraries biological triplicate D. rerio caudal fin clip pools were collected at 0 dpa 1 dpa or 4 dpa time points via razor blade VWR from 15 fish aged 3 month 12 month. Homozygous Evx1 knockout fish screened visually by jointless phenotype Borday et al. 2001 were used for Evx1 knockout libraries. Cells were dissociated using 1.18 U/mL Liberase DH Roche in Hank's Balanced Salt Solution Gibco stirring at 37°C for 2 hours collected in 15 minute increments then strained through a 70 μm nylon cell strainer Corning. Samples were quantitated for 100K live cells using the Countess Automated Cell Counter Thermo Fisher Scientific.Fibroblast samples were sorted for 100K mCherry+ fluorescent cells on a B C Astrios cell sorter insead of quaitized for 100K live cells on a Contess SCell Conter. RNA seq libraries were prepared using a Stranded mRNA seq Kit KAPA. ATAC seq library preparation was performed as detailed in Buenrostro et al. 2013.,GEO Accession:GSM4411413,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,cDNA,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,Illumina HiSeq 4000,,SRP252754,,,WFin1dpi.RNAseq_injured_RNA_1dpa_C_S39_L004_R1_001.fastq.gz,fastq,3053752296.0,59877496.0,GSM4411413 r1,0:51 1:0,A:705251373;C:775521263;G:724421121;T:848486693;N:71846,51,0,,,705251373,775521263,724421121,848486693,71846,SRX7910553,SRS6318062,SRA1054723,GEO,"Poss, Cell Biology, Duke University",1,0.9345,,0.08171,,0.74326,,0.47043,,51,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,hiseq_era,unknown,cdna_unspecified,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,United States,2020-03-13,Multi-stage,Multi-stage,Fin,Surface Structure 58400,SRR11305412,SRX7910552,SRS6318061,SRP252754,PRJNA612515,Tissue Regeneration Enhancer Element Discovery by Chromatin Accessibility Profiling of Regenerating Zebrafish Fins,GSE146960,Other,Mammalian genomes likely encode all gene products required to regenerate an amputated limb yet they lack the correct instructions for strategically modulating those gene products to accomplish limb regeneration. Zebrafish and many other non mammalian vertebrates possess these instructions which exist as gene cis regulatory elements. Here to identify candidate tissue regeneration enhancer elements TREEs important for zebrafish fin regeneration we performed ATAC seq from bulk tissue or purified fibroblasts of uninjured and regenerating caudal fins. We identified thousands of DNA regions from each tissue type with dynamic accessibility during regeneration and assigned these regions to proximal genes with corresponding changes in RNA levels. To determine whether these profiles revealed bona fide TREEs we tested the sufficiency of several sequences in stable transgenic and mutant lines. These experiments identified new regulatory sequences near several induced and/or required genes including fgf20a cx43 and mdka with unique expression domains for each confirmed TREE. Deletion of TREE sequences from the zebrafish genome revealed requirements and redundancies surrounding cis regulatory regions. Our study generates a novel resource for dissecting the regulatory mechanisms of appendage regeneration. Overall design: Samples were enzymatically dissociated with Liberase and collected in biological triplicates for RNA and ATAC library preparation. Corresponding sample pools include: whole fin 0 dpa and whole fin 4 dpa whole fin 0 dpa and whole fin 1 dpa and fibroblast 0 dpa and fibroblast 4 dpa.,,pubmed:32665240,,RNAseq; whole fin; 0dpa; uninjured; batch 2; rep3,GSM4411412,,source name:RNAseq; whole fin; 0dpi; uninjured|time:0 dpa|tissue:whole fin|genotype:wild type,RNAseq; whole fin; 0dpa; uninjured; batch 2; rep3,RNA Seq reads were trimmed by Trim Galore 0.6.4 with q 15 and then mapped with TopHat v 2.1.1 with parameters b2 very sensitive no coverage search and supplying the UCSC danRer10 refSeq gene annotation. Gene level read counts were obtained using the htseq count v1.6.1 by the reads with MAPQ greater than 30. ATAC Seq reads were trimmed by Trim Galore 0.4.1 with q 15 and then mapped with bowtie22.2.5 with parameters very sensitive to zebrafish genome UCSC danRer10 refSeq annotation. The mapped reads were filtered by MAPQ greater than 30 by samtools v 1.5 and duplicated reads were removed by picard v 1.91. Bigwig files were generated by kentUtils. Genome build: danRer10 Supplementary files format and content: raw counts of sequencing reads for the features of interest for RNAseq; bigwig files were generated using kentUtils by converting the output of macs2 bedgraph,RNAseq; whole fin; 0dpi; uninjured,For fibroblast libraries triplicate Tgtph1b:creER;ubi:switch caudal fins were clipped and treated at 2dpa for 12 hours in 4uM Tamoxifen Sigma Aldritch Tornini et al. 2016. Fins were allowed to regenerate fully for two months and 75 fish fin samples were pooled for each biological replicate pool.,For RNA seq biological triplicate D. rerio caudal fin clip pools were collected at 0 dpa 1 dpa or 4 dpa time points via razor blade VWR from 15 fish aged between 3 month 12 month. Homozygous evx1 knockout fish were used for evx1 knockout libraries. Fin tissue was collected in Tri Reagent Sigma and isolated by ethanol precipitation. RNA was further purified with the RNA Clean & Concentrator Kit 5 Zymo. For ATAC seq libraries biological triplicate D. rerio caudal fin clip pools were collected at 0 dpa 1 dpa or 4 dpa time points via razor blade VWR from 15 fish aged 3 month 12 month. Homozygous Evx1 knockout fish screened visually by jointless phenotype Borday et al. 2001 were used for Evx1 knockout libraries. Cells were dissociated using 1.18 U/mL Liberase DH Roche in Hank’s Balanced Salt Solution Gibco stirring at 37°C for 2 hours collected in 15 minute increments then strained through a 70 μm nylon cell strainer Corning. Samples were quantitated for 100K live cells using the Countess Automated Cell Counter Thermo Fisher Scientific.Fibroblast samples were sorted for 100K mCherry+ fluorescent cells on a B C Astrios cell sorter insead of quaitized for 100K live cells on a Contess SCell Conter. RNA seq libraries were prepared using a Stranded mRNA seq Kit KAPA. ATAC seq library preparation was performed as detailed in Buenrostro et al. 2013.,D. rerio from the outbred Ekkwill EK strain ranging from 4 month to 12 month were used for whole fin library preparations Tgtph1b:mCherry NTR;ubi:switch fish were used for fibroblast library preparation Tornini et al 2016 and homozygous evx1 knockout fish were used for evx1 libraries Schulte et al 2011. Water temperature was maintained at 27.5°C and fish were kept on a 14/10 light/dark cycle. Fish were anesthetized in 0.75% v/v 2 phenoxyethanol Sigma Aldrich in fish water. Work with D. rerio was performed in accordance with Duke University guidelines.,time:0 dpa|tissue:whole fin|genotype:wild type,GSM4411412,GSM4411412: RNAseq; whole fin; 0dpa; uninjured; batch 2; rep3; Danio rerio; RNA Seq,GSM4411412,,1,For RNA seq biological triplicate D. rerio caudal fin clip pools were collected at 0 dpa 1 dpa or 4 dpa time points via razor blade VWR from 15 fish aged between 3 month 12 month. Homozygous evx1 knockout fish were used for evx1 knockout libraries. Fin tissue was collected in Tri Reagent Sigma and isolated by ethanol precipitation. RNA was further purified with the RNA Clean & Concentrator Kit 5 Zymo. For ATAC seq libraries biological triplicate D. rerio caudal fin clip pools were collected at 0 dpa 1 dpa or 4 dpa time points via razor blade VWR from 15 fish aged 3 month 12 month. Homozygous Evx1 knockout fish screened visually by jointless phenotype Borday et al. 2001 were used for Evx1 knockout libraries. Cells were dissociated using 1.18 U/mL Liberase DH Roche in Hank's Balanced Salt Solution Gibco stirring at 37°C for 2 hours collected in 15 minute increments then strained through a 70 μm nylon cell strainer Corning. Samples were quantitated for 100K live cells using the Countess Automated Cell Counter Thermo Fisher Scientific.Fibroblast samples were sorted for 100K mCherry+ fluorescent cells on a B C Astrios cell sorter insead of quaitized for 100K live cells on a Contess SCell Conter. RNA seq libraries were prepared using a Stranded mRNA seq Kit KAPA. ATAC seq library preparation was performed as detailed in Buenrostro et al. 2013.,GEO Accession:GSM4411412,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,cDNA,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,Illumina HiSeq 4000,,SRP252754,,,WFin1dpi.RNAseq_uninjured_RNA_0dpa_B_S35_L004_R1_001.fastq.gz,fastq,3095170620.0,60689620.0,GSM4411412 r1,0:51 1:0,A:728515579;C:769711604;G:717419279;T:879450837;N:73321,51,0,,,728515579,769711604,717419279,879450837,73321,SRX7910552,SRS6318061,SRA1054723,GEO,"Poss, Cell Biology, Duke University",1,0.91314,,0.09911,,0.72498,,0.46006,,51,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,hiseq_era,unknown,cdna_unspecified,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,United States,2020-03-13,Multi-stage,Multi-stage,Fin,Surface Structure 58401,SRR11305411,SRX7910551,SRS6318060,SRP252754,PRJNA612515,Tissue Regeneration Enhancer Element Discovery by Chromatin Accessibility Profiling of Regenerating Zebrafish Fins,GSE146960,Other,Mammalian genomes likely encode all gene products required to regenerate an amputated limb yet they lack the correct instructions for strategically modulating those gene products to accomplish limb regeneration. Zebrafish and many other non mammalian vertebrates possess these instructions which exist as gene cis regulatory elements. Here to identify candidate tissue regeneration enhancer elements TREEs important for zebrafish fin regeneration we performed ATAC seq from bulk tissue or purified fibroblasts of uninjured and regenerating caudal fins. We identified thousands of DNA regions from each tissue type with dynamic accessibility during regeneration and assigned these regions to proximal genes with corresponding changes in RNA levels. To determine whether these profiles revealed bona fide TREEs we tested the sufficiency of several sequences in stable transgenic and mutant lines. These experiments identified new regulatory sequences near several induced and/or required genes including fgf20a cx43 and mdka with unique expression domains for each confirmed TREE. Deletion of TREE sequences from the zebrafish genome revealed requirements and redundancies surrounding cis regulatory regions. Our study generates a novel resource for dissecting the regulatory mechanisms of appendage regeneration. Overall design: Samples were enzymatically dissociated with Liberase and collected in biological triplicates for RNA and ATAC library preparation. Corresponding sample pools include: whole fin 0 dpa and whole fin 4 dpa whole fin 0 dpa and whole fin 1 dpa and fibroblast 0 dpa and fibroblast 4 dpa.,,pubmed:32665240,,RNAseq; whole fin; 0dpa; uninjured; batch 2; rep2,GSM4411411,,source name:RNAseq; whole fin; 0dpi; uninjured|time:0 dpa|tissue:whole fin|genotype:wild type,RNAseq; whole fin; 0dpa; uninjured; batch 2; rep2,RNA Seq reads were trimmed by Trim Galore 0.6.4 with q 15 and then mapped with TopHat v 2.1.1 with parameters b2 very sensitive no coverage search and supplying the UCSC danRer10 refSeq gene annotation. Gene level read counts were obtained using the htseq count v1.6.1 by the reads with MAPQ greater than 30. ATAC Seq reads were trimmed by Trim Galore 0.4.1 with q 15 and then mapped with bowtie22.2.5 with parameters very sensitive to zebrafish genome UCSC danRer10 refSeq annotation. The mapped reads were filtered by MAPQ greater than 30 by samtools v 1.5 and duplicated reads were removed by picard v 1.91. Bigwig files were generated by kentUtils. Genome build: danRer10 Supplementary files format and content: raw counts of sequencing reads for the features of interest for RNAseq; bigwig files were generated using kentUtils by converting the output of macs2 bedgraph,RNAseq; whole fin; 0dpi; uninjured,For fibroblast libraries triplicate Tgtph1b:creER;ubi:switch caudal fins were clipped and treated at 2dpa for 12 hours in 4uM Tamoxifen Sigma Aldritch Tornini et al. 2016. Fins were allowed to regenerate fully for two months and 75 fish fin samples were pooled for each biological replicate pool.,For RNA seq biological triplicate D. rerio caudal fin clip pools were collected at 0 dpa 1 dpa or 4 dpa time points via razor blade VWR from 15 fish aged between 3 month 12 month. Homozygous evx1 knockout fish were used for evx1 knockout libraries. Fin tissue was collected in Tri Reagent Sigma and isolated by ethanol precipitation. RNA was further purified with the RNA Clean & Concentrator Kit 5 Zymo. For ATAC seq libraries biological triplicate D. rerio caudal fin clip pools were collected at 0 dpa 1 dpa or 4 dpa time points via razor blade VWR from 15 fish aged 3 month 12 month. Homozygous Evx1 knockout fish screened visually by jointless phenotype Borday et al. 2001 were used for Evx1 knockout libraries. Cells were dissociated using 1.18 U/mL Liberase DH Roche in Hank’s Balanced Salt Solution Gibco stirring at 37°C for 2 hours collected in 15 minute increments then strained through a 70 μm nylon cell strainer Corning. Samples were quantitated for 100K live cells using the Countess Automated Cell Counter Thermo Fisher Scientific.Fibroblast samples were sorted for 100K mCherry+ fluorescent cells on a B C Astrios cell sorter insead of quaitized for 100K live cells on a Contess SCell Conter. RNA seq libraries were prepared using a Stranded mRNA seq Kit KAPA. ATAC seq library preparation was performed as detailed in Buenrostro et al. 2013.,D. rerio from the outbred Ekkwill EK strain ranging from 4 month to 12 month were used for whole fin library preparations Tgtph1b:mCherry NTR;ubi:switch fish were used for fibroblast library preparation Tornini et al 2016 and homozygous evx1 knockout fish were used for evx1 libraries Schulte et al 2011. Water temperature was maintained at 27.5°C and fish were kept on a 14/10 light/dark cycle. Fish were anesthetized in 0.75% v/v 2 phenoxyethanol Sigma Aldrich in fish water. Work with D. rerio was performed in accordance with Duke University guidelines.,time:0 dpa|tissue:whole fin|genotype:wild type,GSM4411411,GSM4411411: RNAseq; whole fin; 0dpa; uninjured; batch 2; rep2; Danio rerio; RNA Seq,GSM4411411,,1,For RNA seq biological triplicate D. rerio caudal fin clip pools were collected at 0 dpa 1 dpa or 4 dpa time points via razor blade VWR from 15 fish aged between 3 month 12 month. Homozygous evx1 knockout fish were used for evx1 knockout libraries. Fin tissue was collected in Tri Reagent Sigma and isolated by ethanol precipitation. RNA was further purified with the RNA Clean & Concentrator Kit 5 Zymo. For ATAC seq libraries biological triplicate D. rerio caudal fin clip pools were collected at 0 dpa 1 dpa or 4 dpa time points via razor blade VWR from 15 fish aged 3 month 12 month. Homozygous Evx1 knockout fish screened visually by jointless phenotype Borday et al. 2001 were used for Evx1 knockout libraries. Cells were dissociated using 1.18 U/mL Liberase DH Roche in Hank's Balanced Salt Solution Gibco stirring at 37°C for 2 hours collected in 15 minute increments then strained through a 70 μm nylon cell strainer Corning. Samples were quantitated for 100K live cells using the Countess Automated Cell Counter Thermo Fisher Scientific.Fibroblast samples were sorted for 100K mCherry+ fluorescent cells on a B C Astrios cell sorter insead of quaitized for 100K live cells on a Contess SCell Conter. RNA seq libraries were prepared using a Stranded mRNA seq Kit KAPA. ATAC seq library preparation was performed as detailed in Buenrostro et al. 2013.,GEO Accession:GSM4411411,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,cDNA,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,Illumina HiSeq 4000,,SRP252754,,,WFin1dpi.RNAseq_uninjured_RNA_0dpa_C_S36_L004_R1_001.fastq.gz,fastq,2959811163.0,58035513.0,GSM4411411 r1,0:51 1:0,A:702000960;C:731163416;G:687625038;T:838953116;N:68633,51,0,,,702000960,731163416,687625038,838953116,68633,SRX7910551,SRS6318060,SRA1054723,GEO,"Poss, Cell Biology, Duke University",1,0.91317,,0.09909,,0.7237,,0.45771,,51,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,hiseq_era,unknown,cdna_unspecified,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,United States,2020-03-13,Multi-stage,Multi-stage,Fin,Surface Structure 58402,SRR11305410,SRX7910550,SRS6318059,SRP252754,PRJNA612515,Tissue Regeneration Enhancer Element Discovery by Chromatin Accessibility Profiling of Regenerating Zebrafish Fins,GSE146960,Other,Mammalian genomes likely encode all gene products required to regenerate an amputated limb yet they lack the correct instructions for strategically modulating those gene products to accomplish limb regeneration. Zebrafish and many other non mammalian vertebrates possess these instructions which exist as gene cis regulatory elements. Here to identify candidate tissue regeneration enhancer elements TREEs important for zebrafish fin regeneration we performed ATAC seq from bulk tissue or purified fibroblasts of uninjured and regenerating caudal fins. We identified thousands of DNA regions from each tissue type with dynamic accessibility during regeneration and assigned these regions to proximal genes with corresponding changes in RNA levels. To determine whether these profiles revealed bona fide TREEs we tested the sufficiency of several sequences in stable transgenic and mutant lines. These experiments identified new regulatory sequences near several induced and/or required genes including fgf20a cx43 and mdka with unique expression domains for each confirmed TREE. Deletion of TREE sequences from the zebrafish genome revealed requirements and redundancies surrounding cis regulatory regions. Our study generates a novel resource for dissecting the regulatory mechanisms of appendage regeneration. Overall design: Samples were enzymatically dissociated with Liberase and collected in biological triplicates for RNA and ATAC library preparation. Corresponding sample pools include: whole fin 0 dpa and whole fin 4 dpa whole fin 0 dpa and whole fin 1 dpa and fibroblast 0 dpa and fibroblast 4 dpa.,,pubmed:32665240,,RNAseq; whole fin; 0dpa; uninjured; batch 2; rep1,GSM4411410,,source name:RNAseq; whole fin; 0dpi; uninjured|time:0 dpa|tissue:whole fin|genotype:wild type,RNAseq; whole fin; 0dpa; uninjured; batch 2; rep1,RNA Seq reads were trimmed by Trim Galore 0.6.4 with q 15 and then mapped with TopHat v 2.1.1 with parameters b2 very sensitive no coverage search and supplying the UCSC danRer10 refSeq gene annotation. Gene level read counts were obtained using the htseq count v1.6.1 by the reads with MAPQ greater than 30. ATAC Seq reads were trimmed by Trim Galore 0.4.1 with q 15 and then mapped with bowtie22.2.5 with parameters very sensitive to zebrafish genome UCSC danRer10 refSeq annotation. The mapped reads were filtered by MAPQ greater than 30 by samtools v 1.5 and duplicated reads were removed by picard v 1.91. Bigwig files were generated by kentUtils. Genome build: danRer10 Supplementary files format and content: raw counts of sequencing reads for the features of interest for RNAseq; bigwig files were generated using kentUtils by converting the output of macs2 bedgraph,RNAseq; whole fin; 0dpi; uninjured,For fibroblast libraries triplicate Tgtph1b:creER;ubi:switch caudal fins were clipped and treated at 2dpa for 12 hours in 4uM Tamoxifen Sigma Aldritch Tornini et al. 2016. Fins were allowed to regenerate fully for two months and 75 fish fin samples were pooled for each biological replicate pool.,For RNA seq biological triplicate D. rerio caudal fin clip pools were collected at 0 dpa 1 dpa or 4 dpa time points via razor blade VWR from 15 fish aged between 3 month 12 month. Homozygous evx1 knockout fish were used for evx1 knockout libraries. Fin tissue was collected in Tri Reagent Sigma and isolated by ethanol precipitation. RNA was further purified with the RNA Clean & Concentrator Kit 5 Zymo. For ATAC seq libraries biological triplicate D. rerio caudal fin clip pools were collected at 0 dpa 1 dpa or 4 dpa time points via razor blade VWR from 15 fish aged 3 month 12 month. Homozygous Evx1 knockout fish screened visually by jointless phenotype Borday et al. 2001 were used for Evx1 knockout libraries. Cells were dissociated using 1.18 U/mL Liberase DH Roche in Hank’s Balanced Salt Solution Gibco stirring at 37°C for 2 hours collected in 15 minute increments then strained through a 70 μm nylon cell strainer Corning. Samples were quantitated for 100K live cells using the Countess Automated Cell Counter Thermo Fisher Scientific.Fibroblast samples were sorted for 100K mCherry+ fluorescent cells on a B C Astrios cell sorter insead of quaitized for 100K live cells on a Contess SCell Conter. RNA seq libraries were prepared using a Stranded mRNA seq Kit KAPA. ATAC seq library preparation was performed as detailed in Buenrostro et al. 2013.,D. rerio from the outbred Ekkwill EK strain ranging from 4 month to 12 month were used for whole fin library preparations Tgtph1b:mCherry NTR;ubi:switch fish were used for fibroblast library preparation Tornini et al 2016 and homozygous evx1 knockout fish were used for evx1 libraries Schulte et al 2011. Water temperature was maintained at 27.5°C and fish were kept on a 14/10 light/dark cycle. Fish were anesthetized in 0.75% v/v 2 phenoxyethanol Sigma Aldrich in fish water. Work with D. rerio was performed in accordance with Duke University guidelines.,time:0 dpa|tissue:whole fin|genotype:wild type,GSM4411410,GSM4411410: RNAseq; whole fin; 0dpa; uninjured; batch 2; rep1; Danio rerio; RNA Seq,GSM4411410,,1,For RNA seq biological triplicate D. rerio caudal fin clip pools were collected at 0 dpa 1 dpa or 4 dpa time points via razor blade VWR from 15 fish aged between 3 month 12 month. Homozygous evx1 knockout fish were used for evx1 knockout libraries. Fin tissue was collected in Tri Reagent Sigma and isolated by ethanol precipitation. RNA was further purified with the RNA Clean & Concentrator Kit 5 Zymo. For ATAC seq libraries biological triplicate D. rerio caudal fin clip pools were collected at 0 dpa 1 dpa or 4 dpa time points via razor blade VWR from 15 fish aged 3 month 12 month. Homozygous Evx1 knockout fish screened visually by jointless phenotype Borday et al. 2001 were used for Evx1 knockout libraries. Cells were dissociated using 1.18 U/mL Liberase DH Roche in Hank's Balanced Salt Solution Gibco stirring at 37°C for 2 hours collected in 15 minute increments then strained through a 70 μm nylon cell strainer Corning. Samples were quantitated for 100K live cells using the Countess Automated Cell Counter Thermo Fisher Scientific.Fibroblast samples were sorted for 100K mCherry+ fluorescent cells on a B C Astrios cell sorter insead of quaitized for 100K live cells on a Contess SCell Conter. RNA seq libraries were prepared using a Stranded mRNA seq Kit KAPA. ATAC seq library preparation was performed as detailed in Buenrostro et al. 2013.,GEO Accession:GSM4411410,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,cDNA,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,Illumina HiSeq 4000,,SRP252754,,,WFin1dpi.RNAseq_uninjured_RNA_0dpa_A_S34_L004_R1_001.fastq.gz,fastq,2850762963.0,55897313.0,GSM4411410 r1,0:51 1:0,A:675289993;C:707558547;G:662291002;T:805558844;N:64577,51,0,,,675289993,707558547,662291002,805558844,64577,SRX7910550,SRS6318059,SRA1054723,GEO,"Poss, Cell Biology, Duke University",1,0.91288,,0.10801,,0.72165,,0.46866,,51,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,hiseq_era,unknown,cdna_unspecified,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,United States,2020-03-13,Multi-stage,Multi-stage,Fin,Surface Structure 58403,SRR11305409,SRX7910549,SRS6318058,SRP252754,PRJNA612515,Tissue Regeneration Enhancer Element Discovery by Chromatin Accessibility Profiling of Regenerating Zebrafish Fins,GSE146960,Other,Mammalian genomes likely encode all gene products required to regenerate an amputated limb yet they lack the correct instructions for strategically modulating those gene products to accomplish limb regeneration. Zebrafish and many other non mammalian vertebrates possess these instructions which exist as gene cis regulatory elements. Here to identify candidate tissue regeneration enhancer elements TREEs important for zebrafish fin regeneration we performed ATAC seq from bulk tissue or purified fibroblasts of uninjured and regenerating caudal fins. We identified thousands of DNA regions from each tissue type with dynamic accessibility during regeneration and assigned these regions to proximal genes with corresponding changes in RNA levels. To determine whether these profiles revealed bona fide TREEs we tested the sufficiency of several sequences in stable transgenic and mutant lines. These experiments identified new regulatory sequences near several induced and/or required genes including fgf20a cx43 and mdka with unique expression domains for each confirmed TREE. Deletion of TREE sequences from the zebrafish genome revealed requirements and redundancies surrounding cis regulatory regions. Our study generates a novel resource for dissecting the regulatory mechanisms of appendage regeneration. Overall design: Samples were enzymatically dissociated with Liberase and collected in biological triplicates for RNA and ATAC library preparation. Corresponding sample pools include: whole fin 0 dpa and whole fin 4 dpa whole fin 0 dpa and whole fin 1 dpa and fibroblast 0 dpa and fibroblast 4 dpa.,,pubmed:32665240,,RNAseq; whole fin; 4dpa; injured; batch 1; rep2,GSM4411409,,source name:RNAseq; whole fin; 4dpi; injured|time:4 dpa|tissue:whole fin|genotype:wild type,RNAseq; whole fin; 4dpa; injured; batch 1; rep2,RNA Seq reads were trimmed by Trim Galore 0.6.4 with q 15 and then mapped with TopHat v 2.1.1 with parameters b2 very sensitive no coverage search and supplying the UCSC danRer10 refSeq gene annotation. Gene level read counts were obtained using the htseq count v1.6.1 by the reads with MAPQ greater than 30. ATAC Seq reads were trimmed by Trim Galore 0.4.1 with q 15 and then mapped with bowtie22.2.5 with parameters very sensitive to zebrafish genome UCSC danRer10 refSeq annotation. The mapped reads were filtered by MAPQ greater than 30 by samtools v 1.5 and duplicated reads were removed by picard v 1.91. Bigwig files were generated by kentUtils. Genome build: danRer10 Supplementary files format and content: raw counts of sequencing reads for the features of interest for RNAseq; bigwig files were generated using kentUtils by converting the output of macs2 bedgraph,RNAseq; whole fin; 4dpi; injured,For fibroblast libraries triplicate Tgtph1b:creER;ubi:switch caudal fins were clipped and treated at 2dpa for 12 hours in 4uM Tamoxifen Sigma Aldritch Tornini et al. 2016. Fins were allowed to regenerate fully for two months and 75 fish fin samples were pooled for each biological replicate pool.,For RNA seq biological triplicate D. rerio caudal fin clip pools were collected at 0 dpa 1 dpa or 4 dpa time points via razor blade VWR from 15 fish aged between 3 month 12 month. Homozygous evx1 knockout fish were used for evx1 knockout libraries. Fin tissue was collected in Tri Reagent Sigma and isolated by ethanol precipitation. RNA was further purified with the RNA Clean & Concentrator Kit 5 Zymo. For ATAC seq libraries biological triplicate D. rerio caudal fin clip pools were collected at 0 dpa 1 dpa or 4 dpa time points via razor blade VWR from 15 fish aged 3 month 12 month. Homozygous Evx1 knockout fish screened visually by jointless phenotype Borday et al. 2001 were used for Evx1 knockout libraries. Cells were dissociated using 1.18 U/mL Liberase DH Roche in Hank’s Balanced Salt Solution Gibco stirring at 37°C for 2 hours collected in 15 minute increments then strained through a 70 μm nylon cell strainer Corning. Samples were quantitated for 100K live cells using the Countess Automated Cell Counter Thermo Fisher Scientific.Fibroblast samples were sorted for 100K mCherry+ fluorescent cells on a B C Astrios cell sorter insead of quaitized for 100K live cells on a Contess SCell Conter. RNA seq libraries were prepared using a Stranded mRNA seq Kit KAPA. ATAC seq library preparation was performed as detailed in Buenrostro et al. 2013.,D. rerio from the outbred Ekkwill EK strain ranging from 4 month to 12 month were used for whole fin library preparations Tgtph1b:mCherry NTR;ubi:switch fish were used for fibroblast library preparation Tornini et al 2016 and homozygous evx1 knockout fish were used for evx1 libraries Schulte et al 2011. Water temperature was maintained at 27.5°C and fish were kept on a 14/10 light/dark cycle. Fish were anesthetized in 0.75% v/v 2 phenoxyethanol Sigma Aldrich in fish water. Work with D. rerio was performed in accordance with Duke University guidelines.,time:4 dpa|tissue:whole fin|genotype:wild type,GSM4411409,GSM4411409: RNAseq; whole fin; 4dpa; injured; batch 1; rep2; Danio rerio; RNA Seq,GSM4411409,,1,For RNA seq biological triplicate D. rerio caudal fin clip pools were collected at 0 dpa 1 dpa or 4 dpa time points via razor blade VWR from 15 fish aged between 3 month 12 month. Homozygous evx1 knockout fish were used for evx1 knockout libraries. Fin tissue was collected in Tri Reagent Sigma and isolated by ethanol precipitation. RNA was further purified with the RNA Clean & Concentrator Kit 5 Zymo. For ATAC seq libraries biological triplicate D. rerio caudal fin clip pools were collected at 0 dpa 1 dpa or 4 dpa time points via razor blade VWR from 15 fish aged 3 month 12 month. Homozygous Evx1 knockout fish screened visually by jointless phenotype Borday et al. 2001 were used for Evx1 knockout libraries. Cells were dissociated using 1.18 U/mL Liberase DH Roche in Hank's Balanced Salt Solution Gibco stirring at 37°C for 2 hours collected in 15 minute increments then strained through a 70 μm nylon cell strainer Corning. Samples were quantitated for 100K live cells using the Countess Automated Cell Counter Thermo Fisher Scientific.Fibroblast samples were sorted for 100K mCherry+ fluorescent cells on a B C Astrios cell sorter insead of quaitized for 100K live cells on a Contess SCell Conter. RNA seq libraries were prepared using a Stranded mRNA seq Kit KAPA. ATAC seq library preparation was performed as detailed in Buenrostro et al. 2013.,GEO Accession:GSM4411409,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,cDNA,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,Illumina HiSeq 4000,,SRP252754,,,WFin.RNAseq_injured_reg2.fastq.gz,fastq,2523651950.0,50473039.0,GSM4411409 r1,0:50,A:658848054;C:605884052;G:596099791;T:662690555;N:129498,50,,,,658848054,605884052,596099791,662690555,129498,SRX7910549,SRS6318058,SRA1054723,GEO,"Poss, Cell Biology, Duke University",1,0.91959,,0.07092,,0.70717,,0.45829,,50,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,hiseq_era,unknown,cdna_unspecified,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,United States,2020-03-13,Multi-stage,Multi-stage,Fin,Surface Structure 58404,SRR11305408,SRX7910548,SRS6318057,SRP252754,PRJNA612515,Tissue Regeneration Enhancer Element Discovery by Chromatin Accessibility Profiling of Regenerating Zebrafish Fins,GSE146960,Other,Mammalian genomes likely encode all gene products required to regenerate an amputated limb yet they lack the correct instructions for strategically modulating those gene products to accomplish limb regeneration. Zebrafish and many other non mammalian vertebrates possess these instructions which exist as gene cis regulatory elements. Here to identify candidate tissue regeneration enhancer elements TREEs important for zebrafish fin regeneration we performed ATAC seq from bulk tissue or purified fibroblasts of uninjured and regenerating caudal fins. We identified thousands of DNA regions from each tissue type with dynamic accessibility during regeneration and assigned these regions to proximal genes with corresponding changes in RNA levels. To determine whether these profiles revealed bona fide TREEs we tested the sufficiency of several sequences in stable transgenic and mutant lines. These experiments identified new regulatory sequences near several induced and/or required genes including fgf20a cx43 and mdka with unique expression domains for each confirmed TREE. Deletion of TREE sequences from the zebrafish genome revealed requirements and redundancies surrounding cis regulatory regions. Our study generates a novel resource for dissecting the regulatory mechanisms of appendage regeneration. Overall design: Samples were enzymatically dissociated with Liberase and collected in biological triplicates for RNA and ATAC library preparation. Corresponding sample pools include: whole fin 0 dpa and whole fin 4 dpa whole fin 0 dpa and whole fin 1 dpa and fibroblast 0 dpa and fibroblast 4 dpa.,,pubmed:32665240,,RNAseq; whole fin; 4dpa; injured; batch 1; rep1,GSM4411408,,source name:RNAseq; whole fin; 4dpi; injured|time:4 dpa|tissue:whole fin|genotype:wild type,RNAseq; whole fin; 4dpa; injured; batch 1; rep1,RNA Seq reads were trimmed by Trim Galore 0.6.4 with q 15 and then mapped with TopHat v 2.1.1 with parameters b2 very sensitive no coverage search and supplying the UCSC danRer10 refSeq gene annotation. Gene level read counts were obtained using the htseq count v1.6.1 by the reads with MAPQ greater than 30. ATAC Seq reads were trimmed by Trim Galore 0.4.1 with q 15 and then mapped with bowtie22.2.5 with parameters very sensitive to zebrafish genome UCSC danRer10 refSeq annotation. The mapped reads were filtered by MAPQ greater than 30 by samtools v 1.5 and duplicated reads were removed by picard v 1.91. Bigwig files were generated by kentUtils. Genome build: danRer10 Supplementary files format and content: raw counts of sequencing reads for the features of interest for RNAseq; bigwig files were generated using kentUtils by converting the output of macs2 bedgraph,RNAseq; whole fin; 4dpi; injured,For fibroblast libraries triplicate Tgtph1b:creER;ubi:switch caudal fins were clipped and treated at 2dpa for 12 hours in 4uM Tamoxifen Sigma Aldritch Tornini et al. 2016. Fins were allowed to regenerate fully for two months and 75 fish fin samples were pooled for each biological replicate pool.,For RNA seq biological triplicate D. rerio caudal fin clip pools were collected at 0 dpa 1 dpa or 4 dpa time points via razor blade VWR from 15 fish aged between 3 month 12 month. Homozygous evx1 knockout fish were used for evx1 knockout libraries. Fin tissue was collected in Tri Reagent Sigma and isolated by ethanol precipitation. RNA was further purified with the RNA Clean & Concentrator Kit 5 Zymo. For ATAC seq libraries biological triplicate D. rerio caudal fin clip pools were collected at 0 dpa 1 dpa or 4 dpa time points via razor blade VWR from 15 fish aged 3 month 12 month. Homozygous Evx1 knockout fish screened visually by jointless phenotype Borday et al. 2001 were used for Evx1 knockout libraries. Cells were dissociated using 1.18 U/mL Liberase DH Roche in Hank’s Balanced Salt Solution Gibco stirring at 37°C for 2 hours collected in 15 minute increments then strained through a 70 μm nylon cell strainer Corning. Samples were quantitated for 100K live cells using the Countess Automated Cell Counter Thermo Fisher Scientific.Fibroblast samples were sorted for 100K mCherry+ fluorescent cells on a B C Astrios cell sorter insead of quaitized for 100K live cells on a Contess SCell Conter. RNA seq libraries were prepared using a Stranded mRNA seq Kit KAPA. ATAC seq library preparation was performed as detailed in Buenrostro et al. 2013.,D. rerio from the outbred Ekkwill EK strain ranging from 4 month to 12 month were used for whole fin library preparations Tgtph1b:mCherry NTR;ubi:switch fish were used for fibroblast library preparation Tornini et al 2016 and homozygous evx1 knockout fish were used for evx1 libraries Schulte et al 2011. Water temperature was maintained at 27.5°C and fish were kept on a 14/10 light/dark cycle. Fish were anesthetized in 0.75% v/v 2 phenoxyethanol Sigma Aldrich in fish water. Work with D. rerio was performed in accordance with Duke University guidelines.,time:4 dpa|tissue:whole fin|genotype:wild type,GSM4411408,GSM4411408: RNAseq; whole fin; 4dpa; injured; batch 1; rep1; Danio rerio; RNA Seq,GSM4411408,,1,For RNA seq biological triplicate D. rerio caudal fin clip pools were collected at 0 dpa 1 dpa or 4 dpa time points via razor blade VWR from 15 fish aged between 3 month 12 month. Homozygous evx1 knockout fish were used for evx1 knockout libraries. Fin tissue was collected in Tri Reagent Sigma and isolated by ethanol precipitation. RNA was further purified with the RNA Clean & Concentrator Kit 5 Zymo. For ATAC seq libraries biological triplicate D. rerio caudal fin clip pools were collected at 0 dpa 1 dpa or 4 dpa time points via razor blade VWR from 15 fish aged 3 month 12 month. Homozygous Evx1 knockout fish screened visually by jointless phenotype Borday et al. 2001 were used for Evx1 knockout libraries. Cells were dissociated using 1.18 U/mL Liberase DH Roche in Hank's Balanced Salt Solution Gibco stirring at 37°C for 2 hours collected in 15 minute increments then strained through a 70 μm nylon cell strainer Corning. Samples were quantitated for 100K live cells using the Countess Automated Cell Counter Thermo Fisher Scientific.Fibroblast samples were sorted for 100K mCherry+ fluorescent cells on a B C Astrios cell sorter insead of quaitized for 100K live cells on a Contess SCell Conter. RNA seq libraries were prepared using a Stranded mRNA seq Kit KAPA. ATAC seq library preparation was performed as detailed in Buenrostro et al. 2013.,GEO Accession:GSM4411408,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,cDNA,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,Illumina HiSeq 4000,,SRP252754,,,WFin.RNAseq_injured_reg1.fastq.gz,fastq,2490897750.0,49817955.0,GSM4411408 r1,0:50,A:644634582;C:602186818;G:591877446;T:652072339;N:126565,50,,,,644634582,602186818,591877446,652072339,126565,SRX7910548,SRS6318057,SRA1054723,GEO,"Poss, Cell Biology, Duke University",1,0.92355,,0.06175,,0.71342,,0.46396,,50,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,hiseq_era,unknown,cdna_unspecified,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,United States,2020-03-13,Multi-stage,Multi-stage,Fin,Surface Structure 58405,SRR11305407,SRX7910547,SRS6318056,SRP252754,PRJNA612515,Tissue Regeneration Enhancer Element Discovery by Chromatin Accessibility Profiling of Regenerating Zebrafish Fins,GSE146960,Other,Mammalian genomes likely encode all gene products required to regenerate an amputated limb yet they lack the correct instructions for strategically modulating those gene products to accomplish limb regeneration. Zebrafish and many other non mammalian vertebrates possess these instructions which exist as gene cis regulatory elements. Here to identify candidate tissue regeneration enhancer elements TREEs important for zebrafish fin regeneration we performed ATAC seq from bulk tissue or purified fibroblasts of uninjured and regenerating caudal fins. We identified thousands of DNA regions from each tissue type with dynamic accessibility during regeneration and assigned these regions to proximal genes with corresponding changes in RNA levels. To determine whether these profiles revealed bona fide TREEs we tested the sufficiency of several sequences in stable transgenic and mutant lines. These experiments identified new regulatory sequences near several induced and/or required genes including fgf20a cx43 and mdka with unique expression domains for each confirmed TREE. Deletion of TREE sequences from the zebrafish genome revealed requirements and redundancies surrounding cis regulatory regions. Our study generates a novel resource for dissecting the regulatory mechanisms of appendage regeneration. Overall design: Samples were enzymatically dissociated with Liberase and collected in biological triplicates for RNA and ATAC library preparation. Corresponding sample pools include: whole fin 0 dpa and whole fin 4 dpa whole fin 0 dpa and whole fin 1 dpa and fibroblast 0 dpa and fibroblast 4 dpa.,,pubmed:32665240,,RNAseq; whole fin; 0dpa; uninjured; batch 1; rep2,GSM4411407,,source name:RNAseq; whole fin; 0dpi; uninjured|time:0 dpa|tissue:whole fin|genotype:wild type,RNAseq; whole fin; 0dpa; uninjured; batch 1; rep2,RNA Seq reads were trimmed by Trim Galore 0.6.4 with q 15 and then mapped with TopHat v 2.1.1 with parameters b2 very sensitive no coverage search and supplying the UCSC danRer10 refSeq gene annotation. Gene level read counts were obtained using the htseq count v1.6.1 by the reads with MAPQ greater than 30. ATAC Seq reads were trimmed by Trim Galore 0.4.1 with q 15 and then mapped with bowtie22.2.5 with parameters very sensitive to zebrafish genome UCSC danRer10 refSeq annotation. The mapped reads were filtered by MAPQ greater than 30 by samtools v 1.5 and duplicated reads were removed by picard v 1.91. Bigwig files were generated by kentUtils. Genome build: danRer10 Supplementary files format and content: raw counts of sequencing reads for the features of interest for RNAseq; bigwig files were generated using kentUtils by converting the output of macs2 bedgraph,RNAseq; whole fin; 0dpi; uninjured,For fibroblast libraries triplicate Tgtph1b:creER;ubi:switch caudal fins were clipped and treated at 2dpa for 12 hours in 4uM Tamoxifen Sigma Aldritch Tornini et al. 2016. Fins were allowed to regenerate fully for two months and 75 fish fin samples were pooled for each biological replicate pool.,For RNA seq biological triplicate D. rerio caudal fin clip pools were collected at 0 dpa 1 dpa or 4 dpa time points via razor blade VWR from 15 fish aged between 3 month 12 month. Homozygous evx1 knockout fish were used for evx1 knockout libraries. Fin tissue was collected in Tri Reagent Sigma and isolated by ethanol precipitation. RNA was further purified with the RNA Clean & Concentrator Kit 5 Zymo. For ATAC seq libraries biological triplicate D. rerio caudal fin clip pools were collected at 0 dpa 1 dpa or 4 dpa time points via razor blade VWR from 15 fish aged 3 month 12 month. Homozygous Evx1 knockout fish screened visually by jointless phenotype Borday et al. 2001 were used for Evx1 knockout libraries. Cells were dissociated using 1.18 U/mL Liberase DH Roche in Hank’s Balanced Salt Solution Gibco stirring at 37°C for 2 hours collected in 15 minute increments then strained through a 70 μm nylon cell strainer Corning. Samples were quantitated for 100K live cells using the Countess Automated Cell Counter Thermo Fisher Scientific.Fibroblast samples were sorted for 100K mCherry+ fluorescent cells on a B C Astrios cell sorter insead of quaitized for 100K live cells on a Contess SCell Conter. RNA seq libraries were prepared using a Stranded mRNA seq Kit KAPA. ATAC seq library preparation was performed as detailed in Buenrostro et al. 2013.,D. rerio from the outbred Ekkwill EK strain ranging from 4 month to 12 month were used for whole fin library preparations Tgtph1b:mCherry NTR;ubi:switch fish were used for fibroblast library preparation Tornini et al 2016 and homozygous evx1 knockout fish were used for evx1 libraries Schulte et al 2011. Water temperature was maintained at 27.5°C and fish were kept on a 14/10 light/dark cycle. Fish were anesthetized in 0.75% v/v 2 phenoxyethanol Sigma Aldrich in fish water. Work with D. rerio was performed in accordance with Duke University guidelines.,time:0 dpa|tissue:whole fin|genotype:wild type,GSM4411407,GSM4411407: RNAseq; whole fin; 0dpa; uninjured; batch 1; rep2; Danio rerio; RNA Seq,GSM4411407,,1,For RNA seq biological triplicate D. rerio caudal fin clip pools were collected at 0 dpa 1 dpa or 4 dpa time points via razor blade VWR from 15 fish aged between 3 month 12 month. Homozygous evx1 knockout fish were used for evx1 knockout libraries. Fin tissue was collected in Tri Reagent Sigma and isolated by ethanol precipitation. RNA was further purified with the RNA Clean & Concentrator Kit 5 Zymo. For ATAC seq libraries biological triplicate D. rerio caudal fin clip pools were collected at 0 dpa 1 dpa or 4 dpa time points via razor blade VWR from 15 fish aged 3 month 12 month. Homozygous Evx1 knockout fish screened visually by jointless phenotype Borday et al. 2001 were used for Evx1 knockout libraries. Cells were dissociated using 1.18 U/mL Liberase DH Roche in Hank's Balanced Salt Solution Gibco stirring at 37°C for 2 hours collected in 15 minute increments then strained through a 70 μm nylon cell strainer Corning. Samples were quantitated for 100K live cells using the Countess Automated Cell Counter Thermo Fisher Scientific.Fibroblast samples were sorted for 100K mCherry+ fluorescent cells on a B C Astrios cell sorter insead of quaitized for 100K live cells on a Contess SCell Conter. RNA seq libraries were prepared using a Stranded mRNA seq Kit KAPA. ATAC seq library preparation was performed as detailed in Buenrostro et al. 2013.,GEO Accession:GSM4411407,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,cDNA,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,Illumina HiSeq 4000,,SRP252754,,,WFin.RNAseq_uninjured_Uni2.fastq.gz,fastq,1646067800.0,32921356.0,GSM4411407 r1,0:50,A:433931789;C:391550599;G:380315477;T:440186224;N:83711,50,,,,433931789,391550599,380315477,440186224,83711,SRX7910547,SRS6318056,SRA1054723,GEO,"Poss, Cell Biology, Duke University",1,0.90771,,0.08897,,0.71985,,0.44509,,50,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,hiseq_era,unknown,cdna_unspecified,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,United States,2020-03-13,Multi-stage,Multi-stage,Fin,Surface Structure 58406,SRR11305406,SRX7910546,SRS6318055,SRP252754,PRJNA612515,Tissue Regeneration Enhancer Element Discovery by Chromatin Accessibility Profiling of Regenerating Zebrafish Fins,GSE146960,Other,Mammalian genomes likely encode all gene products required to regenerate an amputated limb yet they lack the correct instructions for strategically modulating those gene products to accomplish limb regeneration. Zebrafish and many other non mammalian vertebrates possess these instructions which exist as gene cis regulatory elements. Here to identify candidate tissue regeneration enhancer elements TREEs important for zebrafish fin regeneration we performed ATAC seq from bulk tissue or purified fibroblasts of uninjured and regenerating caudal fins. We identified thousands of DNA regions from each tissue type with dynamic accessibility during regeneration and assigned these regions to proximal genes with corresponding changes in RNA levels. To determine whether these profiles revealed bona fide TREEs we tested the sufficiency of several sequences in stable transgenic and mutant lines. These experiments identified new regulatory sequences near several induced and/or required genes including fgf20a cx43 and mdka with unique expression domains for each confirmed TREE. Deletion of TREE sequences from the zebrafish genome revealed requirements and redundancies surrounding cis regulatory regions. Our study generates a novel resource for dissecting the regulatory mechanisms of appendage regeneration. Overall design: Samples were enzymatically dissociated with Liberase and collected in biological triplicates for RNA and ATAC library preparation. Corresponding sample pools include: whole fin 0 dpa and whole fin 4 dpa whole fin 0 dpa and whole fin 1 dpa and fibroblast 0 dpa and fibroblast 4 dpa.,,pubmed:32665240,,RNAseq; whole fin; 0dpa; uninjured; batch 1; rep1,GSM4411406,,source name:RNAseq; whole fin; 0dpi; uninjured|time:0 dpa|tissue:whole fin|genotype:wild type,RNAseq; whole fin; 0dpa; uninjured; batch 1; rep1,RNA Seq reads were trimmed by Trim Galore 0.6.4 with q 15 and then mapped with TopHat v 2.1.1 with parameters b2 very sensitive no coverage search and supplying the UCSC danRer10 refSeq gene annotation. Gene level read counts were obtained using the htseq count v1.6.1 by the reads with MAPQ greater than 30. ATAC Seq reads were trimmed by Trim Galore 0.4.1 with q 15 and then mapped with bowtie22.2.5 with parameters very sensitive to zebrafish genome UCSC danRer10 refSeq annotation. The mapped reads were filtered by MAPQ greater than 30 by samtools v 1.5 and duplicated reads were removed by picard v 1.91. Bigwig files were generated by kentUtils. Genome build: danRer10 Supplementary files format and content: raw counts of sequencing reads for the features of interest for RNAseq; bigwig files were generated using kentUtils by converting the output of macs2 bedgraph,RNAseq; whole fin; 0dpi; uninjured,For fibroblast libraries triplicate Tgtph1b:creER;ubi:switch caudal fins were clipped and treated at 2dpa for 12 hours in 4uM Tamoxifen Sigma Aldritch Tornini et al. 2016. Fins were allowed to regenerate fully for two months and 75 fish fin samples were pooled for each biological replicate pool.,For RNA seq biological triplicate D. rerio caudal fin clip pools were collected at 0 dpa 1 dpa or 4 dpa time points via razor blade VWR from 15 fish aged between 3 month 12 month. Homozygous evx1 knockout fish were used for evx1 knockout libraries. Fin tissue was collected in Tri Reagent Sigma and isolated by ethanol precipitation. RNA was further purified with the RNA Clean & Concentrator Kit 5 Zymo. For ATAC seq libraries biological triplicate D. rerio caudal fin clip pools were collected at 0 dpa 1 dpa or 4 dpa time points via razor blade VWR from 15 fish aged 3 month 12 month. Homozygous Evx1 knockout fish screened visually by jointless phenotype Borday et al. 2001 were used for Evx1 knockout libraries. Cells were dissociated using 1.18 U/mL Liberase DH Roche in Hank’s Balanced Salt Solution Gibco stirring at 37°C for 2 hours collected in 15 minute increments then strained through a 70 μm nylon cell strainer Corning. Samples were quantitated for 100K live cells using the Countess Automated Cell Counter Thermo Fisher Scientific.Fibroblast samples were sorted for 100K mCherry+ fluorescent cells on a B C Astrios cell sorter insead of quaitized for 100K live cells on a Contess SCell Conter. RNA seq libraries were prepared using a Stranded mRNA seq Kit KAPA. ATAC seq library preparation was performed as detailed in Buenrostro et al. 2013.,D. rerio from the outbred Ekkwill EK strain ranging from 4 month to 12 month were used for whole fin library preparations Tgtph1b:mCherry NTR;ubi:switch fish were used for fibroblast library preparation Tornini et al 2016 and homozygous evx1 knockout fish were used for evx1 libraries Schulte et al 2011. Water temperature was maintained at 27.5°C and fish were kept on a 14/10 light/dark cycle. Fish were anesthetized in 0.75% v/v 2 phenoxyethanol Sigma Aldrich in fish water. Work with D. rerio was performed in accordance with Duke University guidelines.,time:0 dpa|tissue:whole fin|genotype:wild type,GSM4411406,GSM4411406: RNAseq; whole fin; 0dpa; uninjured; batch 1; rep1; Danio rerio; RNA Seq,GSM4411406,,1,For RNA seq biological triplicate D. rerio caudal fin clip pools were collected at 0 dpa 1 dpa or 4 dpa time points via razor blade VWR from 15 fish aged between 3 month 12 month. Homozygous evx1 knockout fish were used for evx1 knockout libraries. Fin tissue was collected in Tri Reagent Sigma and isolated by ethanol precipitation. RNA was further purified with the RNA Clean & Concentrator Kit 5 Zymo. For ATAC seq libraries biological triplicate D. rerio caudal fin clip pools were collected at 0 dpa 1 dpa or 4 dpa time points via razor blade VWR from 15 fish aged 3 month 12 month. Homozygous Evx1 knockout fish screened visually by jointless phenotype Borday et al. 2001 were used for Evx1 knockout libraries. Cells were dissociated using 1.18 U/mL Liberase DH Roche in Hank's Balanced Salt Solution Gibco stirring at 37°C for 2 hours collected in 15 minute increments then strained through a 70 μm nylon cell strainer Corning. Samples were quantitated for 100K live cells using the Countess Automated Cell Counter Thermo Fisher Scientific.Fibroblast samples were sorted for 100K mCherry+ fluorescent cells on a B C Astrios cell sorter insead of quaitized for 100K live cells on a Contess SCell Conter. RNA seq libraries were prepared using a Stranded mRNA seq Kit KAPA. ATAC seq library preparation was performed as detailed in Buenrostro et al. 2013.,GEO Accession:GSM4411406,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,cDNA,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,Illumina HiSeq 4000,,SRP252754,,,WFin.RNAseq_uninjured_Uni1.fastq.gz,fastq,2093137350.0,41862747.0,GSM4411406 r1,0:50,A:539953107;C:505949113;G:500993563;T:546137713;N:103854,50,,,,539953107,505949113,500993563,546137713,103854,SRX7910546,SRS6318055,SRA1054723,GEO,"Poss, Cell Biology, Duke University",1,0.9119,,0.07318,,0.72969,,0.43282,,50,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,hiseq_era,unknown,cdna_unspecified,unknown,bulk,unknown,unknown,,United States,2020-03-13,Multi-stage,Multi-stage,Fin,Surface Structure 61953,SRR13075149,SRX9522192,SRS7729391,SRP292933,PRJNA679002,Role of Il 11 signaling in adult heart and fin regeneration in zebrafish,GSE161647,Transcriptome Analysis,In adult mammals tissue damage post myocardial infarction induces myofibroblast differentiation and the formation of a permanent functionally inert scar. However the molecular mechanisms that govern myofibroblast differentiation and scarring remain poorly understood. Some vertebrates like zebrafish display a remarkable regenerative potential with only limited and transient fibrosis post tissue damage including in the heart. Here employing comparative expression profiling coupled with loss of function approaches we identified the canonical Interleukin 11/Stat3 signaling axis as a core component of regeneration in zebrafish. Notably animals with loss of Interleukin 11 receptor Il11ra function reach maturity without xxx developmental defects but exhibit strongly impaired cardiac regeneration with increased myofibroblast differentiation and the formation of a permanent collagenous scar similar to what is observed in adult mammals. Using zebrafish fate mapping approaches reporter lines and human primary cell culture methods we provide evidence that Interleukin 11 signaling limits endothelial to myofibroblast transdifferentiation and maintains a pro regenerative niche to promote cardiac regeneration. Altogether our data reveal a vital role for endothelial Interleukin 11/Stat3 signaling in containing injury induced cardiac fibrosis. Overall design: 96 hours post cryoinjury cardiac ventricle samples from adult il11ra mutant vs. wild type were analyzed in duplicates with each replicate derived by pooling 2 ventricles. 24 hours post amputation caudal fin samples from adult il11ra mutant vs. wild type were analyzed in triplicates with each replicate derived from single fins.,,pubmed:34516874,,il11ra mutant fin 24 hpa rep3,GSM4911940,,tissue:Caudal fin|developmental stage:adult|genotype:il11ra mutant|treatment:fin amputation|time point:24 hpa,il11ra mutant fin 24 hpa rep3,The resulting raw reads were assessed for quality adapter content and duplication rates with FastQC. Trimmomatic version 0.39 was employed to trim reads post a quality drop below a mean of Q20 in a window of 10 nucleotides. Only reads between 30 and 150 nucleotides were cleared for further analyses. Trimmed and filtered reads were aligned versus Ensembl zebrafish genome version danRer11 GRCz11 using STAR 2.7.3a with the parameter “ outFilterMismatchNoverLmax 0.1” to increase the maximum ratio of mismatches to mapped length to 10%. The number of reads aligning to genes was counted with featureCounts 1.6.5 tool from the Subread package. Only reads mapping at least partially inside exons were admitted and aggregated per gene. Reads overlapping multiple genes or aligning to multiple regions were excluded. Differentially expressed genes were identified using DESeq2 version 1.26. The Ensemble annotation was enriched with UniProt data release 06.06.2014 based on Ensembl gene identifiers Genome build: danRer11 Supplementary files format and content: library size normalized counts,Caudal fin,,Ventricle and fin samples were harvested into TRIzol and flash frozen in liqN2. and stored in 80°C until further processing. Tissues were then blended with Bullet blender and RNA was isolated from adult zebrafish ventricles and caudal fin tissues using the miRNeasy micro Kit Qiagen combined with on column DNase digestion DNase Free DNase Set Qiagen to avoid contamination by genomic DNA. 200 500ng of total RNA was used as input for Truseq Stranded mRNA Library preparation following the low sample protocol Illumina,,developmental stage:adult|genotype:il11ra mutant|treatment:fin amputation|time point:24 hpa,GSM4911940,GSM4911940: il11ra mutant fin 24 hpa rep3; Danio rerio; RNA Seq,GSM4911940,,1,Ventricle and fin samples were harvested into TRIzol and flash frozen in liqN2. and stored in 80°C until further processing. Tissues were then blended with Bullet blender and RNA was isolated from adult zebrafish ventricles and caudal fin tissues using the miRNeasy micro Kit Qiagen combined with on column DNase digestion DNase Free DNase Set Qiagen to avoid contamination by genomic DNA. 200 500ng of total RNA was used as input for Truseq Stranded mRNA Library preparation following the low sample protocol Illumina,GEO Accession:GSM4911940,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,cDNA,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,NextSeq 500,,SRP292933,,,Reischauer_Mut3_R1.fastq.gz,fastq,1851680943.0,25042899.0,GSM4911940 r1,0:73.94 1:0,A:487052421;C:413627060;G:426276923;T:524716682;N:7857,73,0,,,487052421,413627060,426276923,524716682,7857,SRX9522192,SRS7729391,SRA1160354,GEO,MPI for heart and lung research,1,0.91637,,0.09982,,0.74241,,0.48534,,75,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,nextseq,unknown,cdna_unspecified,trueseq,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Germany,2020-11-17,Adult,Adult,Fin,Surface Structure 61954,SRR13075148,SRX9522191,SRS7729392,SRP292933,PRJNA679002,Role of Il 11 signaling in adult heart and fin regeneration in zebrafish,GSE161647,Transcriptome Analysis,In adult mammals tissue damage post myocardial infarction induces myofibroblast differentiation and the formation of a permanent functionally inert scar. However the molecular mechanisms that govern myofibroblast differentiation and scarring remain poorly understood. Some vertebrates like zebrafish display a remarkable regenerative potential with only limited and transient fibrosis post tissue damage including in the heart. Here employing comparative expression profiling coupled with loss of function approaches we identified the canonical Interleukin 11/Stat3 signaling axis as a core component of regeneration in zebrafish. Notably animals with loss of Interleukin 11 receptor Il11ra function reach maturity without xxx developmental defects but exhibit strongly impaired cardiac regeneration with increased myofibroblast differentiation and the formation of a permanent collagenous scar similar to what is observed in adult mammals. Using zebrafish fate mapping approaches reporter lines and human primary cell culture methods we provide evidence that Interleukin 11 signaling limits endothelial to myofibroblast transdifferentiation and maintains a pro regenerative niche to promote cardiac regeneration. Altogether our data reveal a vital role for endothelial Interleukin 11/Stat3 signaling in containing injury induced cardiac fibrosis. Overall design: 96 hours post cryoinjury cardiac ventricle samples from adult il11ra mutant vs. wild type were analyzed in duplicates with each replicate derived by pooling 2 ventricles. 24 hours post amputation caudal fin samples from adult il11ra mutant vs. wild type were analyzed in triplicates with each replicate derived from single fins.,,pubmed:34516874,,il11ra mutant fin 24 hpa rep2,GSM4911939,,tissue:Caudal fin|developmental stage:adult|genotype:il11ra mutant|treatment:fin amputation|time point:24 hpa,il11ra mutant fin 24 hpa rep2,The resulting raw reads were assessed for quality adapter content and duplication rates with FastQC. Trimmomatic version 0.39 was employed to trim reads post a quality drop below a mean of Q20 in a window of 10 nucleotides. Only reads between 30 and 150 nucleotides were cleared for further analyses. Trimmed and filtered reads were aligned versus Ensembl zebrafish genome version danRer11 GRCz11 using STAR 2.7.3a with the parameter “ outFilterMismatchNoverLmax 0.1” to increase the maximum ratio of mismatches to mapped length to 10%. The number of reads aligning to genes was counted with featureCounts 1.6.5 tool from the Subread package. Only reads mapping at least partially inside exons were admitted and aggregated per gene. Reads overlapping multiple genes or aligning to multiple regions were excluded. Differentially expressed genes were identified using DESeq2 version 1.26. The Ensemble annotation was enriched with UniProt data release 06.06.2014 based on Ensembl gene identifiers Genome build: danRer11 Supplementary files format and content: library size normalized counts,Caudal fin,,Ventricle and fin samples were harvested into TRIzol and flash frozen in liqN2. and stored in 80°C until further processing. Tissues were then blended with Bullet blender and RNA was isolated from adult zebrafish ventricles and caudal fin tissues using the miRNeasy micro Kit Qiagen combined with on column DNase digestion DNase Free DNase Set Qiagen to avoid contamination by genomic DNA. 200 500ng of total RNA was used as input for Truseq Stranded mRNA Library preparation following the low sample protocol Illumina,,developmental stage:adult|genotype:il11ra mutant|treatment:fin amputation|time point:24 hpa,GSM4911939,GSM4911939: il11ra mutant fin 24 hpa rep2; Danio rerio; RNA Seq,GSM4911939,,1,Ventricle and fin samples were harvested into TRIzol and flash frozen in liqN2. and stored in 80°C until further processing. Tissues were then blended with Bullet blender and RNA was isolated from adult zebrafish ventricles and caudal fin tissues using the miRNeasy micro Kit Qiagen combined with on column DNase digestion DNase Free DNase Set Qiagen to avoid contamination by genomic DNA. 200 500ng of total RNA was used as input for Truseq Stranded mRNA Library preparation following the low sample protocol Illumina,GEO Accession:GSM4911939,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,cDNA,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,NextSeq 500,,SRP292933,,,Reischauer_Mut2_R1.fastq.gz,fastq,2038104304.0,27531234.0,GSM4911939 r1,0:74.03 1:0,A:539462021;C:452986503;G:465883483;T:579763891;N:8406,74,0,,,539462021,452986503,465883483,579763891,8406,SRX9522191,SRS7729392,SRA1160354,GEO,MPI for heart and lung research,1,0.90834,,0.09857,,0.74154,,0.47755,,75,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,nextseq,unknown,cdna_unspecified,trueseq,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Germany,2020-11-17,Adult,Adult,Fin,Surface Structure 61955,SRR13075147,SRX9522190,SRS7729390,SRP292933,PRJNA679002,Role of Il 11 signaling in adult heart and fin regeneration in zebrafish,GSE161647,Transcriptome Analysis,In adult mammals tissue damage post myocardial infarction induces myofibroblast differentiation and the formation of a permanent functionally inert scar. However the molecular mechanisms that govern myofibroblast differentiation and scarring remain poorly understood. Some vertebrates like zebrafish display a remarkable regenerative potential with only limited and transient fibrosis post tissue damage including in the heart. Here employing comparative expression profiling coupled with loss of function approaches we identified the canonical Interleukin 11/Stat3 signaling axis as a core component of regeneration in zebrafish. Notably animals with loss of Interleukin 11 receptor Il11ra function reach maturity without xxx developmental defects but exhibit strongly impaired cardiac regeneration with increased myofibroblast differentiation and the formation of a permanent collagenous scar similar to what is observed in adult mammals. Using zebrafish fate mapping approaches reporter lines and human primary cell culture methods we provide evidence that Interleukin 11 signaling limits endothelial to myofibroblast transdifferentiation and maintains a pro regenerative niche to promote cardiac regeneration. Altogether our data reveal a vital role for endothelial Interleukin 11/Stat3 signaling in containing injury induced cardiac fibrosis. Overall design: 96 hours post cryoinjury cardiac ventricle samples from adult il11ra mutant vs. wild type were analyzed in duplicates with each replicate derived by pooling 2 ventricles. 24 hours post amputation caudal fin samples from adult il11ra mutant vs. wild type were analyzed in triplicates with each replicate derived from single fins.,,pubmed:34516874,,il11ra mutant fin 24 hpa rep1,GSM4911938,,tissue:Caudal fin|developmental stage:adult|genotype:il11ra mutant|treatment:fin amputation|time point:24 hpa,il11ra mutant fin 24 hpa rep1,The resulting raw reads were assessed for quality adapter content and duplication rates with FastQC. Trimmomatic version 0.39 was employed to trim reads post a quality drop below a mean of Q20 in a window of 10 nucleotides. Only reads between 30 and 150 nucleotides were cleared for further analyses. Trimmed and filtered reads were aligned versus Ensembl zebrafish genome version danRer11 GRCz11 using STAR 2.7.3a with the parameter “ outFilterMismatchNoverLmax 0.1” to increase the maximum ratio of mismatches to mapped length to 10%. The number of reads aligning to genes was counted with featureCounts 1.6.5 tool from the Subread package. Only reads mapping at least partially inside exons were admitted and aggregated per gene. Reads overlapping multiple genes or aligning to multiple regions were excluded. Differentially expressed genes were identified using DESeq2 version 1.26. The Ensemble annotation was enriched with UniProt data release 06.06.2014 based on Ensembl gene identifiers Genome build: danRer11 Supplementary files format and content: library size normalized counts,Caudal fin,,Ventricle and fin samples were harvested into TRIzol and flash frozen in liqN2. and stored in 80°C until further processing. Tissues were then blended with Bullet blender and RNA was isolated from adult zebrafish ventricles and caudal fin tissues using the miRNeasy micro Kit Qiagen combined with on column DNase digestion DNase Free DNase Set Qiagen to avoid contamination by genomic DNA. 200 500ng of total RNA was used as input for Truseq Stranded mRNA Library preparation following the low sample protocol Illumina,,developmental stage:adult|genotype:il11ra mutant|treatment:fin amputation|time point:24 hpa,GSM4911938,GSM4911938: il11ra mutant fin 24 hpa rep1; Danio rerio; RNA Seq,GSM4911938,,1,Ventricle and fin samples were harvested into TRIzol and flash frozen in liqN2. and stored in 80°C until further processing. Tissues were then blended with Bullet blender and RNA was isolated from adult zebrafish ventricles and caudal fin tissues using the miRNeasy micro Kit Qiagen combined with on column DNase digestion DNase Free DNase Set Qiagen to avoid contamination by genomic DNA. 200 500ng of total RNA was used as input for Truseq Stranded mRNA Library preparation following the low sample protocol Illumina,GEO Accession:GSM4911938,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,cDNA,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,NextSeq 500,,SRP292933,,,Reischauer_Mut1_R1.fastq.gz,fastq,1531546717.0,20622961.0,GSM4911938 r1,0:74.26 1:0,A:407261383;C:338321295;G:350917574;T:435041628;N:4837,74,0,,,407261383,338321295,350917574,435041628,4837,SRX9522190,SRS7729390,SRA1160354,GEO,MPI for heart and lung research,1,0.90833,,0.10892,,0.77928,,0.48087,,75,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,nextseq,unknown,cdna_unspecified,trueseq,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Germany,2020-11-17,Adult,Adult,Fin,Surface Structure 61956,SRR13075146,SRX9522189,SRS7729389,SRP292933,PRJNA679002,Role of Il 11 signaling in adult heart and fin regeneration in zebrafish,GSE161647,Transcriptome Analysis,In adult mammals tissue damage post myocardial infarction induces myofibroblast differentiation and the formation of a permanent functionally inert scar. However the molecular mechanisms that govern myofibroblast differentiation and scarring remain poorly understood. Some vertebrates like zebrafish display a remarkable regenerative potential with only limited and transient fibrosis post tissue damage including in the heart. Here employing comparative expression profiling coupled with loss of function approaches we identified the canonical Interleukin 11/Stat3 signaling axis as a core component of regeneration in zebrafish. Notably animals with loss of Interleukin 11 receptor Il11ra function reach maturity without xxx developmental defects but exhibit strongly impaired cardiac regeneration with increased myofibroblast differentiation and the formation of a permanent collagenous scar similar to what is observed in adult mammals. Using zebrafish fate mapping approaches reporter lines and human primary cell culture methods we provide evidence that Interleukin 11 signaling limits endothelial to myofibroblast transdifferentiation and maintains a pro regenerative niche to promote cardiac regeneration. Altogether our data reveal a vital role for endothelial Interleukin 11/Stat3 signaling in containing injury induced cardiac fibrosis. Overall design: 96 hours post cryoinjury cardiac ventricle samples from adult il11ra mutant vs. wild type were analyzed in duplicates with each replicate derived by pooling 2 ventricles. 24 hours post amputation caudal fin samples from adult il11ra mutant vs. wild type were analyzed in triplicates with each replicate derived from single fins.,,pubmed:34516874,,Wild type fin 24 hpa rep3,GSM4911937,,tissue:Caudal fin|developmental stage:adult|genotype:wild type|treatment:fin amputation|time point:24 hpa,Wild type fin 24 hpa rep3,The resulting raw reads were assessed for quality adapter content and duplication rates with FastQC. Trimmomatic version 0.39 was employed to trim reads post a quality drop below a mean of Q20 in a window of 10 nucleotides. Only reads between 30 and 150 nucleotides were cleared for further analyses. Trimmed and filtered reads were aligned versus Ensembl zebrafish genome version danRer11 GRCz11 using STAR 2.7.3a with the parameter “ outFilterMismatchNoverLmax 0.1” to increase the maximum ratio of mismatches to mapped length to 10%. The number of reads aligning to genes was counted with featureCounts 1.6.5 tool from the Subread package. Only reads mapping at least partially inside exons were admitted and aggregated per gene. Reads overlapping multiple genes or aligning to multiple regions were excluded. Differentially expressed genes were identified using DESeq2 version 1.26. The Ensemble annotation was enriched with UniProt data release 06.06.2014 based on Ensembl gene identifiers Genome build: danRer11 Supplementary files format and content: library size normalized counts,Caudal fin,,Ventricle and fin samples were harvested into TRIzol and flash frozen in liqN2. and stored in 80°C until further processing. Tissues were then blended with Bullet blender and RNA was isolated from adult zebrafish ventricles and caudal fin tissues using the miRNeasy micro Kit Qiagen combined with on column DNase digestion DNase Free DNase Set Qiagen to avoid contamination by genomic DNA. 200 500ng of total RNA was used as input for Truseq Stranded mRNA Library preparation following the low sample protocol Illumina,,developmental stage:adult|genotype:wild type|treatment:fin amputation|time point:24 hpa,GSM4911937,GSM4911937: Wild type fin 24 hpa rep3; Danio rerio; RNA Seq,GSM4911937,,1,Ventricle and fin samples were harvested into TRIzol and flash frozen in liqN2. and stored in 80°C until further processing. Tissues were then blended with Bullet blender and RNA was isolated from adult zebrafish ventricles and caudal fin tissues using the miRNeasy micro Kit Qiagen combined with on column DNase digestion DNase Free DNase Set Qiagen to avoid contamination by genomic DNA. 200 500ng of total RNA was used as input for Truseq Stranded mRNA Library preparation following the low sample protocol Illumina,GEO Accession:GSM4911937,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,cDNA,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,NextSeq 500,,SRP292933,,,Reischauer_WT3_R1.fastq.gz,fastq,2048531484.0,27689871.0,GSM4911937 r1,0:73.98 1:0,A:535652814;C:462058885;G:474011200;T:576800188;N:8397,73,0,,,535652814,462058885,474011200,576800188,8397,SRX9522189,SRS7729389,SRA1160354,GEO,MPI for heart and lung research,1,0.93148,,0.08066,,0.7516,,0.4515,,75,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,nextseq,unknown,cdna_unspecified,trueseq,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Germany,2020-11-17,Adult,Adult,Fin,Surface Structure 61957,SRR13075145,SRX9522188,SRS7729388,SRP292933,PRJNA679002,Role of Il 11 signaling in adult heart and fin regeneration in zebrafish,GSE161647,Transcriptome Analysis,In adult mammals tissue damage post myocardial infarction induces myofibroblast differentiation and the formation of a permanent functionally inert scar. However the molecular mechanisms that govern myofibroblast differentiation and scarring remain poorly understood. Some vertebrates like zebrafish display a remarkable regenerative potential with only limited and transient fibrosis post tissue damage including in the heart. Here employing comparative expression profiling coupled with loss of function approaches we identified the canonical Interleukin 11/Stat3 signaling axis as a core component of regeneration in zebrafish. Notably animals with loss of Interleukin 11 receptor Il11ra function reach maturity without xxx developmental defects but exhibit strongly impaired cardiac regeneration with increased myofibroblast differentiation and the formation of a permanent collagenous scar similar to what is observed in adult mammals. Using zebrafish fate mapping approaches reporter lines and human primary cell culture methods we provide evidence that Interleukin 11 signaling limits endothelial to myofibroblast transdifferentiation and maintains a pro regenerative niche to promote cardiac regeneration. Altogether our data reveal a vital role for endothelial Interleukin 11/Stat3 signaling in containing injury induced cardiac fibrosis. Overall design: 96 hours post cryoinjury cardiac ventricle samples from adult il11ra mutant vs. wild type were analyzed in duplicates with each replicate derived by pooling 2 ventricles. 24 hours post amputation caudal fin samples from adult il11ra mutant vs. wild type were analyzed in triplicates with each replicate derived from single fins.,,pubmed:34516874,,Wild type fin 24 hpa rep2,GSM4911936,,tissue:Caudal fin|developmental stage:adult|genotype:wild type|treatment:fin amputation|time point:24 hpa,Wild type fin 24 hpa rep2,The resulting raw reads were assessed for quality adapter content and duplication rates with FastQC. Trimmomatic version 0.39 was employed to trim reads post a quality drop below a mean of Q20 in a window of 10 nucleotides. Only reads between 30 and 150 nucleotides were cleared for further analyses. Trimmed and filtered reads were aligned versus Ensembl zebrafish genome version danRer11 GRCz11 using STAR 2.7.3a with the parameter “ outFilterMismatchNoverLmax 0.1” to increase the maximum ratio of mismatches to mapped length to 10%. The number of reads aligning to genes was counted with featureCounts 1.6.5 tool from the Subread package. Only reads mapping at least partially inside exons were admitted and aggregated per gene. Reads overlapping multiple genes or aligning to multiple regions were excluded. Differentially expressed genes were identified using DESeq2 version 1.26. The Ensemble annotation was enriched with UniProt data release 06.06.2014 based on Ensembl gene identifiers Genome build: danRer11 Supplementary files format and content: library size normalized counts,Caudal fin,,Ventricle and fin samples were harvested into TRIzol and flash frozen in liqN2. and stored in 80°C until further processing. Tissues were then blended with Bullet blender and RNA was isolated from adult zebrafish ventricles and caudal fin tissues using the miRNeasy micro Kit Qiagen combined with on column DNase digestion DNase Free DNase Set Qiagen to avoid contamination by genomic DNA. 200 500ng of total RNA was used as input for Truseq Stranded mRNA Library preparation following the low sample protocol Illumina,,developmental stage:adult|genotype:wild type|treatment:fin amputation|time point:24 hpa,GSM4911936,GSM4911936: Wild type fin 24 hpa rep2; Danio rerio; RNA Seq,GSM4911936,,1,Ventricle and fin samples were harvested into TRIzol and flash frozen in liqN2. and stored in 80°C until further processing. Tissues were then blended with Bullet blender and RNA was isolated from adult zebrafish ventricles and caudal fin tissues using the miRNeasy micro Kit Qiagen combined with on column DNase digestion DNase Free DNase Set Qiagen to avoid contamination by genomic DNA. 200 500ng of total RNA was used as input for Truseq Stranded mRNA Library preparation following the low sample protocol Illumina,GEO Accession:GSM4911936,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,cDNA,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,NextSeq 500,,SRP292933,,,Reischauer_WT2_R1.fastq.gz,fastq,2321703525.0,31306353.0,GSM4911936 r1,0:74.16 1:0,A:595815579;C:531081067;G:543179238;T:651618366;N:9275,74,0,,,595815579,531081067,543179238,651618366,9275,SRX9522188,SRS7729388,SRA1160354,GEO,MPI for heart and lung research,1,0.93426,,0.07768,,0.74826,,0.4649,,75,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,nextseq,unknown,cdna_unspecified,trueseq,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Germany,2020-11-17,Adult,Adult,Fin,Surface Structure 61958,SRR13075144,SRX9522187,SRS7729387,SRP292933,PRJNA679002,Role of Il 11 signaling in adult heart and fin regeneration in zebrafish,GSE161647,Transcriptome Analysis,In adult mammals tissue damage post myocardial infarction induces myofibroblast differentiation and the formation of a permanent functionally inert scar. However the molecular mechanisms that govern myofibroblast differentiation and scarring remain poorly understood. Some vertebrates like zebrafish display a remarkable regenerative potential with only limited and transient fibrosis post tissue damage including in the heart. Here employing comparative expression profiling coupled with loss of function approaches we identified the canonical Interleukin 11/Stat3 signaling axis as a core component of regeneration in zebrafish. Notably animals with loss of Interleukin 11 receptor Il11ra function reach maturity without xxx developmental defects but exhibit strongly impaired cardiac regeneration with increased myofibroblast differentiation and the formation of a permanent collagenous scar similar to what is observed in adult mammals. Using zebrafish fate mapping approaches reporter lines and human primary cell culture methods we provide evidence that Interleukin 11 signaling limits endothelial to myofibroblast transdifferentiation and maintains a pro regenerative niche to promote cardiac regeneration. Altogether our data reveal a vital role for endothelial Interleukin 11/Stat3 signaling in containing injury induced cardiac fibrosis. Overall design: 96 hours post cryoinjury cardiac ventricle samples from adult il11ra mutant vs. wild type were analyzed in duplicates with each replicate derived by pooling 2 ventricles. 24 hours post amputation caudal fin samples from adult il11ra mutant vs. wild type were analyzed in triplicates with each replicate derived from single fins.,,pubmed:34516874,,Wild type fin 24 hpa rep1,GSM4911935,,tissue:Caudal fin|developmental stage:adult|genotype:wild type|treatment:fin amputation|time point:24 hpa,Wild type fin 24 hpa rep1,The resulting raw reads were assessed for quality adapter content and duplication rates with FastQC. Trimmomatic version 0.39 was employed to trim reads post a quality drop below a mean of Q20 in a window of 10 nucleotides. Only reads between 30 and 150 nucleotides were cleared for further analyses. Trimmed and filtered reads were aligned versus Ensembl zebrafish genome version danRer11 GRCz11 using STAR 2.7.3a with the parameter “ outFilterMismatchNoverLmax 0.1” to increase the maximum ratio of mismatches to mapped length to 10%. The number of reads aligning to genes was counted with featureCounts 1.6.5 tool from the Subread package. Only reads mapping at least partially inside exons were admitted and aggregated per gene. Reads overlapping multiple genes or aligning to multiple regions were excluded. Differentially expressed genes were identified using DESeq2 version 1.26. The Ensemble annotation was enriched with UniProt data release 06.06.2014 based on Ensembl gene identifiers Genome build: danRer11 Supplementary files format and content: library size normalized counts,Caudal fin,,Ventricle and fin samples were harvested into TRIzol and flash frozen in liqN2. and stored in 80°C until further processing. Tissues were then blended with Bullet blender and RNA was isolated from adult zebrafish ventricles and caudal fin tissues using the miRNeasy micro Kit Qiagen combined with on column DNase digestion DNase Free DNase Set Qiagen to avoid contamination by genomic DNA. 200 500ng of total RNA was used as input for Truseq Stranded mRNA Library preparation following the low sample protocol Illumina,,developmental stage:adult|genotype:wild type|treatment:fin amputation|time point:24 hpa,GSM4911935,GSM4911935: Wild type fin 24 hpa rep1; Danio rerio; RNA Seq,GSM4911935,,1,Ventricle and fin samples were harvested into TRIzol and flash frozen in liqN2. and stored in 80°C until further processing. Tissues were then blended with Bullet blender and RNA was isolated from adult zebrafish ventricles and caudal fin tissues using the miRNeasy micro Kit Qiagen combined with on column DNase digestion DNase Free DNase Set Qiagen to avoid contamination by genomic DNA. 200 500ng of total RNA was used as input for Truseq Stranded mRNA Library preparation following the low sample protocol Illumina,GEO Accession:GSM4911935,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,cDNA,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,NextSeq 500,,SRP292933,,,Reischauer_WT1_R1.fastq.gz,fastq,1653887807.0,22260443.0,GSM4911935 r1,0:74.30 1:0,A:433508052;C:372348710;G:380715605;T:467309125;N:6315,74,0,,,433508052,372348710,380715605,467309125,6315,SRX9522187,SRS7729387,SRA1160354,GEO,MPI for heart and lung research,1,0.92899,,0.0857,,0.77835,,0.47041,,75,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,nextseq,unknown,cdna_unspecified,trueseq,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Germany,2020-11-17,Adult,Adult,Fin,Surface Structure 65645,SRR15458886,SRX11758247,SRS9777785,SRP332539,PRJNA754591,Next Generation Sequencing Facilitates Quantitative Analysis of Uncut and Injured Larval Zebrafish Fin Fold Transcriptomes,GSE182113,Transcriptome Analysis,We report increased expression of mitochondrial biogenesis genes in regnerating larval fin fold Overall design: Larval fin fold mRNA profiles of 3 dpf control and fin amputated zebrafish,,pubmed:34622167,,Uncut fin fold rep3,GSM5518678,,source name:larval fin fold|tissue:larval fin fold|treatment:uncut,Uncut fin fold rep3,Tophat and Cufflinks DESeq2 Differential Analysis in R Supplementary files format and content: raw count and normalized counts,larval fin fold,,Fin folds were collected in cold PBS and RNA was harvested using Trizol reagent. Illumina TruSeq RNA Sample Prep Kit Cat#FC 122 1001 was used with 1 ug of total RNA for the construction of sequencing libraries. TruSeq RNA Library Prep Kit v2 Illumina,,tissue:larval fin fold|treatment:uncut,GSM5518678,GSM5518678: Uncut fin fold rep3; Danio rerio; RNA Seq,GSM5518678,,1,Fin folds were collected in cold PBS and RNA was harvested using Trizol reagent. Illumina TruSeq RNA Sample Prep Kit Cat#FC 122 1001 was used with 1 ug of total RNA for the construction of sequencing libraries. TruSeq RNA Library Prep Kit v2 Illumina,GEO Accession:GSM5518678,RNA-Seq,TRANSCRIPTOMIC,cDNA,SINGLE,ILLUMINA,Illumina HiSeq 4000,,SRP332539,,,unDMSO-3_S9_L008_R1_001.fastq.gz,fastq,1463248650.0,28691150.0,GSM5518678 r1,0:51 1:0,A:397962408;C:373148163;G:352701142;T:339050095;N:386842,51,0,,,397962408,373148163,352701142,339050095,386842,SRX11758247,SRS9777785,SRA1278109,GEO,National Tsing-Hua University,1,0.91418,,0.06051,,0.77958,,0.45543,,51,,B,,usable mapping rate,illumina,hiseq_era,unknown,cdna_unspecified,trueseq,bulk,unknown,unknown,,Taiwan,2021-08-14,Larval,Larval,Fin,Surface Structure