RNAquarium Metadata Server
Institute Website Terms of Use Privacy Policy

run_metadata

923 rows where experiment.library_layout = "SINGLE", experiment.library_source = "TRANSCRIPTOMIC" and experiment.library_strategy = "OTHER"

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

devstage_curation >10

experiment.library_selection 5

technology 4

devstage_curation_coarse 4

experiment.platform 3

experiment.library_strategy 1

  • OTHER · 923 ✖

experiment.library_source 1

  • TRANSCRIPTOMIC · 923 ✖

experiment.library_layout 1

  • SINGLE · 923 ✖
Link rowid ▼ run.accession experiment.accession sample.accession study.accession bioproject study.title study.alias study.type study.abstract study.attributes study.PMIDs sample.description sample.title sample.alias sample.centername sample.attributes GEOsample.title GEOsample.dataprocessing GEOsample.source GEOsample.treatmentprotocol GEOsample.extractprotocol GEOsample.growthprotocol GEOsample.characteristics GEOsample.accession experiment.title experiment.alias experiment.library_name experiment.design_description experiment.library_construction_protocol experiment.attributes experiment.library_strategy experiment.library_source experiment.library_selection experiment.library_layout experiment.platform experiment.instrument_model experiment.spot_descriptor experiment.study_ref run.title run.attributes run.filename run.semantic_name run.total_bases run.total_spots run.alias run.read_lengths run.base_counts run.r1_length run.r2_length run.r3_length run.r4_length run.Acount run.Ccount run.Gcount run.Tcount run.Ncount run.experiment run.pool_member submission.accession submission.srasource submission.bioprojectsource seqdetective.n_mates seqdetective.mapping_rate.mate1 seqdetective.mapping_rate.mate2 seqdetective.nofeature_rate.mate1 seqdetective.nofeature_rate.mate2 seqdetective.sparsity.mate1 seqdetective.sparsity.mate2 seqdetective.pos_strand_rate.mate1 seqdetective.pos_strand_rate.mate2 seqdetective.readlen.mate1 seqdetective.readlen.mate2 seqdetective.judgement.mate1 seqdetective.judgement.mate2 seqdetective.judgement.reason platform_family instrument_generation read_bias selection_class prep_kit sc_or_bulk tech_class technology tech_variant submission.bioprojectsource.country earliest_date devstage_curation devstage_curation_coarse tissue_curation tissue_curation_coarse
9717 9717 ERR3842002 ERX3854564 ERS4268611 ERP116106 PRJEB33323 Deconstructing the individual steps of vertebrate translation initiation ena-STUDY-Computational Biology Unit-03-07-2019-10:11:34:314-422 Other In eukaryotes the number of ribosomes synthesizing a given protein depends on how many are recruited to its mRNA their success in navigating its five prime untranslated region UTR and whether they recognize its start codon. Initiation of translation is a rate limiting step in protein synthesis and key to gene expression control 1 but despite this centrality it remains poorly understood 2 3. Here we introduce ribosome complex profiling RCP seq to capture the transcriptome wide occupancy of scanning initiating elongating and terminating ribosome complexes in a higher eukaryote. We track scanning and elongating ribosomes across all five prime UTRs in zebrafish which enable us to assess the individual regulatory contributions from the three stages of initiation: ribosome recruitment scanning of the five prime UTR and recognition of the start codon. Our data sheds light on small subunit recruitment to mRNAs presenting evidence for the threading model and demonstrates that sequence features regulate this recruitment. We estimate the processivity of scanning ribosomes as they traverse the five prime UTR and show that the repressive effects of upstream open reading frames depend on the efficiency of both translation initiation and termination. Finally we determine the optimal initiation contexts by directly estimating the conversion of scanning to elongating ribosomes and demonstrate specific regulation of translation initiation at the endoplasmic reticulum. Our results open for the possibility of deconvoluting translation initiation into separate stages and provides the first view of global occupancy of ribosomal small subunits in a vertebrate. ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03     Shield 4Ei SAMEA6504165 Computational Biology Unit ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27T17:05:06Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2020 01 27T16:04:35Z|External Id:SAMEA6504165|INSDC center name:Computational Biology Unit|INSDC first public:2020 03 27T17:05:06Z|INSDC last update:2020 01 27T16:04:35Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:Shield 4Ei|common name:zebrafish|sample name:Shield 4Ei|scientific name:Danio rerio                 NextSeq 500 sequencing ena EXPERIMENT Computational Biology Unit 27 01 2020 17:26:02:557 2 Shield 4Ei LSU OTHER RCP seq   OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC other SINGLE ILLUMINA NextSeq 500   ERP116106 NextSeq 500 sequencing ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2020 02 14     10915827408.0 143629308.0 ena RUN Computational Biology Unit 27 01 2020 17:26:02:557 2 0:76 A:3900515347;C:2409375725;G:3041696977;T:1564127293;N:112066 76       3900515347 2409375725 3041696977 1564127293 112066 ERX3854564 ERS4268611 ERA2359340 Computational Biology Unit|European Nucleotide Archive Computational Biology Unit 1 0.64398   0.40944   0.98817   0.59337   76   B   usable mapping rate illumina nextseq unknown other unknown bulk unknown unknown   Unknown 2019-07-03 Gastrula Embryo Undetermined Embryo Imprecise
9718 9718 ERR3842001 ERX3854563 ERS4268611 ERP116106 PRJEB33323 Deconstructing the individual steps of vertebrate translation initiation ena-STUDY-Computational Biology Unit-03-07-2019-10:11:34:314-422 Other In eukaryotes the number of ribosomes synthesizing a given protein depends on how many are recruited to its mRNA their success in navigating its five prime untranslated region UTR and whether they recognize its start codon. Initiation of translation is a rate limiting step in protein synthesis and key to gene expression control 1 but despite this centrality it remains poorly understood 2 3. Here we introduce ribosome complex profiling RCP seq to capture the transcriptome wide occupancy of scanning initiating elongating and terminating ribosome complexes in a higher eukaryote. We track scanning and elongating ribosomes across all five prime UTRs in zebrafish which enable us to assess the individual regulatory contributions from the three stages of initiation: ribosome recruitment scanning of the five prime UTR and recognition of the start codon. Our data sheds light on small subunit recruitment to mRNAs presenting evidence for the threading model and demonstrates that sequence features regulate this recruitment. We estimate the processivity of scanning ribosomes as they traverse the five prime UTR and show that the repressive effects of upstream open reading frames depend on the efficiency of both translation initiation and termination. Finally we determine the optimal initiation contexts by directly estimating the conversion of scanning to elongating ribosomes and demonstrate specific regulation of translation initiation at the endoplasmic reticulum. Our results open for the possibility of deconvoluting translation initiation into separate stages and provides the first view of global occupancy of ribosomal small subunits in a vertebrate. ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03     Shield 4Ei SAMEA6504165 Computational Biology Unit ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27T17:05:06Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2020 01 27T16:04:35Z|External Id:SAMEA6504165|INSDC center name:Computational Biology Unit|INSDC first public:2020 03 27T17:05:06Z|INSDC last update:2020 01 27T16:04:35Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:Shield 4Ei|common name:zebrafish|sample name:Shield 4Ei|scientific name:Danio rerio                 NextSeq 500 sequencing ena EXPERIMENT Computational Biology Unit 27 01 2020 17:26:02:557 1 Shield 4Ei SSU OTHER RCP seq   OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC other SINGLE ILLUMINA NextSeq 500   ERP116106 NextSeq 500 sequencing ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2020 02 14     7154041880.0 94132130.0 ena RUN Computational Biology Unit 27 01 2020 17:26:02:557 1 0:76 A:2939474250;C:1489083073;G:1922522149;T:802890185;N:72223 76       2939474250 1489083073 1922522149 802890185 72223 ERX3854563 ERS4268611 ERA2359340 Computational Biology Unit|European Nucleotide Archive Computational Biology Unit 1 0.4369   0.25417   0.9867   0.60047   76   B   usable mapping rate illumina nextseq unknown other unknown bulk unknown unknown   Unknown 2019-07-03 Gastrula Embryo Undetermined Embryo Imprecise
9729 9729 ERR3489881 ERX3511296 ERS3556004 ERP116106 PRJEB33323 Deconstructing the individual steps of vertebrate translation initiation ena-STUDY-Computational Biology Unit-03-07-2019-10:11:34:314-422 Other In eukaryotes the number of ribosomes synthesizing a given protein depends on how many are recruited to its mRNA their success in navigating its five prime untranslated region UTR and whether they recognize its start codon. Initiation of translation is a rate limiting step in protein synthesis and key to gene expression control 1 but despite this centrality it remains poorly understood 2 3. Here we introduce ribosome complex profiling RCP seq to capture the transcriptome wide occupancy of scanning initiating elongating and terminating ribosome complexes in a higher eukaryote. We track scanning and elongating ribosomes across all five prime UTRs in zebrafish which enable us to assess the individual regulatory contributions from the three stages of initiation: ribosome recruitment scanning of the five prime UTR and recognition of the start codon. Our data sheds light on small subunit recruitment to mRNAs presenting evidence for the threading model and demonstrates that sequence features regulate this recruitment. We estimate the processivity of scanning ribosomes as they traverse the five prime UTR and show that the repressive effects of upstream open reading frames depend on the efficiency of both translation initiation and termination. Finally we determine the optimal initiation contexts by directly estimating the conversion of scanning to elongating ribosomes and demonstrate specific regulation of translation initiation at the endoplasmic reticulum. Our results open for the possibility of deconvoluting translation initiation into separate stages and provides the first view of global occupancy of ribosomal small subunits in a vertebrate. ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03     Shield 1 SAMEA5752545 Computational Biology Unit ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|External Id:SAMEA5752545|INSDC center name:Computational Biology Unit|INSDC first public:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|INSDC last update:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:8|common name:zebrafish|dev stage:Shield|sample name:8|scientific name:Danio rerio                 NextSeq 500 sequencing ena EXPERIMENT Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 33 Shield 1 F20 None RCP seq   OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC other SINGLE ILLUMINA NextSeq 500   ERP116106 NextSeq 500 sequencing ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 08 22     975578636.0 12836561.0 ena RUN Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 33 0:76 A:398325549;C:237563934;G:230721299;T:108957698;N:10156 76       398325549 237563934 230721299 108957698 10156 ERX3511296 ERS3556004 ERA2100634 Computational Biology Unit|European Nucleotide Archive Computational Biology Unit 1 0.33102   0.19766   0.99918   0.12812   76   B   usable mapping rate illumina nextseq unknown other unknown bulk unknown unknown   Unknown 2019-07-03 Gastrula Embryo Undetermined Embryo Imprecise
9730 9730 ERR3489880 ERX3511295 ERS3556004 ERP116106 PRJEB33323 Deconstructing the individual steps of vertebrate translation initiation ena-STUDY-Computational Biology Unit-03-07-2019-10:11:34:314-422 Other In eukaryotes the number of ribosomes synthesizing a given protein depends on how many are recruited to its mRNA their success in navigating its five prime untranslated region UTR and whether they recognize its start codon. Initiation of translation is a rate limiting step in protein synthesis and key to gene expression control 1 but despite this centrality it remains poorly understood 2 3. Here we introduce ribosome complex profiling RCP seq to capture the transcriptome wide occupancy of scanning initiating elongating and terminating ribosome complexes in a higher eukaryote. We track scanning and elongating ribosomes across all five prime UTRs in zebrafish which enable us to assess the individual regulatory contributions from the three stages of initiation: ribosome recruitment scanning of the five prime UTR and recognition of the start codon. Our data sheds light on small subunit recruitment to mRNAs presenting evidence for the threading model and demonstrates that sequence features regulate this recruitment. We estimate the processivity of scanning ribosomes as they traverse the five prime UTR and show that the repressive effects of upstream open reading frames depend on the efficiency of both translation initiation and termination. Finally we determine the optimal initiation contexts by directly estimating the conversion of scanning to elongating ribosomes and demonstrate specific regulation of translation initiation at the endoplasmic reticulum. Our results open for the possibility of deconvoluting translation initiation into separate stages and provides the first view of global occupancy of ribosomal small subunits in a vertebrate. ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03     Shield 1 SAMEA5752545 Computational Biology Unit ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|External Id:SAMEA5752545|INSDC center name:Computational Biology Unit|INSDC first public:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|INSDC last update:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:8|common name:zebrafish|dev stage:Shield|sample name:8|scientific name:Danio rerio                 NextSeq 500 sequencing ena EXPERIMENT Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 32 Shield 1 F19 None RCP seq   OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC other SINGLE ILLUMINA NextSeq 500   ERP116106 NextSeq 500 sequencing ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 08 22     931166668.0 12252193.0 ena RUN Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 32 0:76 A:271081669;C:253947035;G:272354427;T:133774815;N:8722 76       271081669 253947035 272354427 133774815 8722 ERX3511295 ERS3556004 ERA2100634 Computational Biology Unit|European Nucleotide Archive Computational Biology Unit 1 0.15598   0.10707   0.99902   0.47314   76   B   usable mapping rate illumina nextseq unknown other unknown bulk unknown unknown   Unknown 2019-07-03 Gastrula Embryo Undetermined Embryo Imprecise
9731 9731 ERR3489879 ERX3511294 ERS3556004 ERP116106 PRJEB33323 Deconstructing the individual steps of vertebrate translation initiation ena-STUDY-Computational Biology Unit-03-07-2019-10:11:34:314-422 Other In eukaryotes the number of ribosomes synthesizing a given protein depends on how many are recruited to its mRNA their success in navigating its five prime untranslated region UTR and whether they recognize its start codon. Initiation of translation is a rate limiting step in protein synthesis and key to gene expression control 1 but despite this centrality it remains poorly understood 2 3. Here we introduce ribosome complex profiling RCP seq to capture the transcriptome wide occupancy of scanning initiating elongating and terminating ribosome complexes in a higher eukaryote. We track scanning and elongating ribosomes across all five prime UTRs in zebrafish which enable us to assess the individual regulatory contributions from the three stages of initiation: ribosome recruitment scanning of the five prime UTR and recognition of the start codon. Our data sheds light on small subunit recruitment to mRNAs presenting evidence for the threading model and demonstrates that sequence features regulate this recruitment. We estimate the processivity of scanning ribosomes as they traverse the five prime UTR and show that the repressive effects of upstream open reading frames depend on the efficiency of both translation initiation and termination. Finally we determine the optimal initiation contexts by directly estimating the conversion of scanning to elongating ribosomes and demonstrate specific regulation of translation initiation at the endoplasmic reticulum. Our results open for the possibility of deconvoluting translation initiation into separate stages and provides the first view of global occupancy of ribosomal small subunits in a vertebrate. ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03     Shield 1 SAMEA5752545 Computational Biology Unit ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|External Id:SAMEA5752545|INSDC center name:Computational Biology Unit|INSDC first public:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|INSDC last update:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:8|common name:zebrafish|dev stage:Shield|sample name:8|scientific name:Danio rerio                 NextSeq 500 sequencing ena EXPERIMENT Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 31 Shield 1 F18 None RCP seq   OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC other SINGLE ILLUMINA NextSeq 500   ERP116106 NextSeq 500 sequencing ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 08 22     1506513268.0 19822543.0 ena RUN Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 31 0:76 A:493273515;C:456544968;G:391677033;T:165002559;N:15193 76       493273515 456544968 391677033 165002559 15193 ERX3511294 ERS3556004 ERA2100634 Computational Biology Unit|European Nucleotide Archive Computational Biology Unit 1 0.01562   0.0053   0.99908   0.8127   76   B   usable mapping rate illumina nextseq unknown other unknown bulk unknown unknown   Unknown 2019-07-03 Gastrula Embryo Undetermined Embryo Imprecise
9732 9732 ERR3489878 ERX3511293 ERS3556004 ERP116106 PRJEB33323 Deconstructing the individual steps of vertebrate translation initiation ena-STUDY-Computational Biology Unit-03-07-2019-10:11:34:314-422 Other In eukaryotes the number of ribosomes synthesizing a given protein depends on how many are recruited to its mRNA their success in navigating its five prime untranslated region UTR and whether they recognize its start codon. Initiation of translation is a rate limiting step in protein synthesis and key to gene expression control 1 but despite this centrality it remains poorly understood 2 3. Here we introduce ribosome complex profiling RCP seq to capture the transcriptome wide occupancy of scanning initiating elongating and terminating ribosome complexes in a higher eukaryote. We track scanning and elongating ribosomes across all five prime UTRs in zebrafish which enable us to assess the individual regulatory contributions from the three stages of initiation: ribosome recruitment scanning of the five prime UTR and recognition of the start codon. Our data sheds light on small subunit recruitment to mRNAs presenting evidence for the threading model and demonstrates that sequence features regulate this recruitment. We estimate the processivity of scanning ribosomes as they traverse the five prime UTR and show that the repressive effects of upstream open reading frames depend on the efficiency of both translation initiation and termination. Finally we determine the optimal initiation contexts by directly estimating the conversion of scanning to elongating ribosomes and demonstrate specific regulation of translation initiation at the endoplasmic reticulum. Our results open for the possibility of deconvoluting translation initiation into separate stages and provides the first view of global occupancy of ribosomal small subunits in a vertebrate. ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03     Shield 1 SAMEA5752545 Computational Biology Unit ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|External Id:SAMEA5752545|INSDC center name:Computational Biology Unit|INSDC first public:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|INSDC last update:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:8|common name:zebrafish|dev stage:Shield|sample name:8|scientific name:Danio rerio                 NextSeq 500 sequencing ena EXPERIMENT Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 30 Shield 1 F17 None RCP seq   OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC other SINGLE ILLUMINA NextSeq 500   ERP116106 NextSeq 500 sequencing ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 08 22     1259456496.0 16571796.0 ena RUN Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 30 0:76 A:471473123;C:333726472;G:302016190;T:152228002;N:12709 76       471473123 333726472 302016190 152228002 12709 ERX3511293 ERS3556004 ERA2100634 Computational Biology Unit|European Nucleotide Archive Computational Biology Unit 1 0.18339   0.12544   0.99928   0.22368   76   B   usable mapping rate illumina nextseq unknown other unknown bulk unknown unknown   Unknown 2019-07-03 Gastrula Embryo Undetermined Embryo Imprecise
9733 9733 ERR3489877 ERX3511292 ERS3556004 ERP116106 PRJEB33323 Deconstructing the individual steps of vertebrate translation initiation ena-STUDY-Computational Biology Unit-03-07-2019-10:11:34:314-422 Other In eukaryotes the number of ribosomes synthesizing a given protein depends on how many are recruited to its mRNA their success in navigating its five prime untranslated region UTR and whether they recognize its start codon. Initiation of translation is a rate limiting step in protein synthesis and key to gene expression control 1 but despite this centrality it remains poorly understood 2 3. Here we introduce ribosome complex profiling RCP seq to capture the transcriptome wide occupancy of scanning initiating elongating and terminating ribosome complexes in a higher eukaryote. We track scanning and elongating ribosomes across all five prime UTRs in zebrafish which enable us to assess the individual regulatory contributions from the three stages of initiation: ribosome recruitment scanning of the five prime UTR and recognition of the start codon. Our data sheds light on small subunit recruitment to mRNAs presenting evidence for the threading model and demonstrates that sequence features regulate this recruitment. We estimate the processivity of scanning ribosomes as they traverse the five prime UTR and show that the repressive effects of upstream open reading frames depend on the efficiency of both translation initiation and termination. Finally we determine the optimal initiation contexts by directly estimating the conversion of scanning to elongating ribosomes and demonstrate specific regulation of translation initiation at the endoplasmic reticulum. Our results open for the possibility of deconvoluting translation initiation into separate stages and provides the first view of global occupancy of ribosomal small subunits in a vertebrate. ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03     Shield 1 SAMEA5752545 Computational Biology Unit ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|External Id:SAMEA5752545|INSDC center name:Computational Biology Unit|INSDC first public:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|INSDC last update:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:8|common name:zebrafish|dev stage:Shield|sample name:8|scientific name:Danio rerio                 NextSeq 500 sequencing ena EXPERIMENT Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 29 Shield 1 F16 None RCP seq   OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC other SINGLE ILLUMINA NextSeq 500   ERP116106 NextSeq 500 sequencing ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 08 22     1364615872.0 17955472.0 ena RUN Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 29 0:76 A:539462776;C:341141880;G:314571683;T:169426048;N:13485 76       539462776 341141880 314571683 169426048 13485 ERX3511292 ERS3556004 ERA2100634 Computational Biology Unit|European Nucleotide Archive Computational Biology Unit 1 0.11663   0.07319   0.99939   0.25377   76   B   usable mapping rate illumina nextseq unknown other unknown bulk unknown unknown   Unknown 2019-07-03 Gastrula Embryo Undetermined Embryo Imprecise
9734 9734 ERR3489876 ERX3511291 ERS3556004 ERP116106 PRJEB33323 Deconstructing the individual steps of vertebrate translation initiation ena-STUDY-Computational Biology Unit-03-07-2019-10:11:34:314-422 Other In eukaryotes the number of ribosomes synthesizing a given protein depends on how many are recruited to its mRNA their success in navigating its five prime untranslated region UTR and whether they recognize its start codon. Initiation of translation is a rate limiting step in protein synthesis and key to gene expression control 1 but despite this centrality it remains poorly understood 2 3. Here we introduce ribosome complex profiling RCP seq to capture the transcriptome wide occupancy of scanning initiating elongating and terminating ribosome complexes in a higher eukaryote. We track scanning and elongating ribosomes across all five prime UTRs in zebrafish which enable us to assess the individual regulatory contributions from the three stages of initiation: ribosome recruitment scanning of the five prime UTR and recognition of the start codon. Our data sheds light on small subunit recruitment to mRNAs presenting evidence for the threading model and demonstrates that sequence features regulate this recruitment. We estimate the processivity of scanning ribosomes as they traverse the five prime UTR and show that the repressive effects of upstream open reading frames depend on the efficiency of both translation initiation and termination. Finally we determine the optimal initiation contexts by directly estimating the conversion of scanning to elongating ribosomes and demonstrate specific regulation of translation initiation at the endoplasmic reticulum. Our results open for the possibility of deconvoluting translation initiation into separate stages and provides the first view of global occupancy of ribosomal small subunits in a vertebrate. ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03     Shield 1 SAMEA5752545 Computational Biology Unit ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|External Id:SAMEA5752545|INSDC center name:Computational Biology Unit|INSDC first public:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|INSDC last update:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:8|common name:zebrafish|dev stage:Shield|sample name:8|scientific name:Danio rerio                 NextSeq 500 sequencing ena EXPERIMENT Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 28 Shield 1 F15 None RCP seq   OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC other SINGLE ILLUMINA NextSeq 500   ERP116106 NextSeq 500 sequencing ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 08 22     952605888.0 12534288.0 ena RUN Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 28 0:76 A:414133320;C:219437277;G:207418049;T:111607418;N:9824 76       414133320 219437277 207418049 111607418 9824 ERX3511291 ERS3556004 ERA2100634 Computational Biology Unit|European Nucleotide Archive Computational Biology Unit 1 0.17603   0.10972   0.99935   0.13311   76   B   usable mapping rate illumina nextseq unknown other unknown bulk unknown unknown   Unknown 2019-07-03 Gastrula Embryo Undetermined Embryo Imprecise
9735 9735 ERR3489875 ERX3511290 ERS3556004 ERP116106 PRJEB33323 Deconstructing the individual steps of vertebrate translation initiation ena-STUDY-Computational Biology Unit-03-07-2019-10:11:34:314-422 Other In eukaryotes the number of ribosomes synthesizing a given protein depends on how many are recruited to its mRNA their success in navigating its five prime untranslated region UTR and whether they recognize its start codon. Initiation of translation is a rate limiting step in protein synthesis and key to gene expression control 1 but despite this centrality it remains poorly understood 2 3. Here we introduce ribosome complex profiling RCP seq to capture the transcriptome wide occupancy of scanning initiating elongating and terminating ribosome complexes in a higher eukaryote. We track scanning and elongating ribosomes across all five prime UTRs in zebrafish which enable us to assess the individual regulatory contributions from the three stages of initiation: ribosome recruitment scanning of the five prime UTR and recognition of the start codon. Our data sheds light on small subunit recruitment to mRNAs presenting evidence for the threading model and demonstrates that sequence features regulate this recruitment. We estimate the processivity of scanning ribosomes as they traverse the five prime UTR and show that the repressive effects of upstream open reading frames depend on the efficiency of both translation initiation and termination. Finally we determine the optimal initiation contexts by directly estimating the conversion of scanning to elongating ribosomes and demonstrate specific regulation of translation initiation at the endoplasmic reticulum. Our results open for the possibility of deconvoluting translation initiation into separate stages and provides the first view of global occupancy of ribosomal small subunits in a vertebrate. ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03     Shield 1 SAMEA5752545 Computational Biology Unit ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|External Id:SAMEA5752545|INSDC center name:Computational Biology Unit|INSDC first public:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|INSDC last update:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:8|common name:zebrafish|dev stage:Shield|sample name:8|scientific name:Danio rerio                 NextSeq 500 sequencing ena EXPERIMENT Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 27 Shield 1 F14 None RCP seq   OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC other SINGLE ILLUMINA NextSeq 500   ERP116106 NextSeq 500 sequencing ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 08 22     870952628.0 11459903.0 ena RUN Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 27 0:76 A:357710338;C:221475453;G:191231014;T:100526675;N:9148 76       357710338 221475453 191231014 100526675 9148 ERX3511290 ERS3556004 ERA2100634 Computational Biology Unit|European Nucleotide Archive Computational Biology Unit 1 0.1248   0.06422   0.99896   0.34819   76   B   usable mapping rate illumina nextseq unknown other unknown bulk unknown unknown   Unknown 2019-07-03 Gastrula Embryo Undetermined Embryo Imprecise
9736 9736 ERR3489874 ERX3511289 ERS3556004 ERP116106 PRJEB33323 Deconstructing the individual steps of vertebrate translation initiation ena-STUDY-Computational Biology Unit-03-07-2019-10:11:34:314-422 Other In eukaryotes the number of ribosomes synthesizing a given protein depends on how many are recruited to its mRNA their success in navigating its five prime untranslated region UTR and whether they recognize its start codon. Initiation of translation is a rate limiting step in protein synthesis and key to gene expression control 1 but despite this centrality it remains poorly understood 2 3. Here we introduce ribosome complex profiling RCP seq to capture the transcriptome wide occupancy of scanning initiating elongating and terminating ribosome complexes in a higher eukaryote. We track scanning and elongating ribosomes across all five prime UTRs in zebrafish which enable us to assess the individual regulatory contributions from the three stages of initiation: ribosome recruitment scanning of the five prime UTR and recognition of the start codon. Our data sheds light on small subunit recruitment to mRNAs presenting evidence for the threading model and demonstrates that sequence features regulate this recruitment. We estimate the processivity of scanning ribosomes as they traverse the five prime UTR and show that the repressive effects of upstream open reading frames depend on the efficiency of both translation initiation and termination. Finally we determine the optimal initiation contexts by directly estimating the conversion of scanning to elongating ribosomes and demonstrate specific regulation of translation initiation at the endoplasmic reticulum. Our results open for the possibility of deconvoluting translation initiation into separate stages and provides the first view of global occupancy of ribosomal small subunits in a vertebrate. ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03     Shield 1 SAMEA5752545 Computational Biology Unit ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|External Id:SAMEA5752545|INSDC center name:Computational Biology Unit|INSDC first public:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|INSDC last update:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:8|common name:zebrafish|dev stage:Shield|sample name:8|scientific name:Danio rerio                 NextSeq 500 sequencing ena EXPERIMENT Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 26 Shield 1 F13 None RCP seq   OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC other SINGLE ILLUMINA NextSeq 500   ERP116106 NextSeq 500 sequencing ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 08 22     981672620.0 12916745.0 ena RUN Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 26 0:76 A:434153198;C:223317075;G:198260771;T:125932145;N:9431 76       434153198 223317075 198260771 125932145 9431 ERX3511289 ERS3556004 ERA2100634 Computational Biology Unit|European Nucleotide Archive Computational Biology Unit 1 0.44603   0.25602   0.99874   0.18074   76   B   usable mapping rate illumina nextseq unknown other unknown bulk unknown unknown   Unknown 2019-07-03 Gastrula Embryo Undetermined Embryo Imprecise
9737 9737 ERR3489873 ERX3511288 ERS3556004 ERP116106 PRJEB33323 Deconstructing the individual steps of vertebrate translation initiation ena-STUDY-Computational Biology Unit-03-07-2019-10:11:34:314-422 Other In eukaryotes the number of ribosomes synthesizing a given protein depends on how many are recruited to its mRNA their success in navigating its five prime untranslated region UTR and whether they recognize its start codon. Initiation of translation is a rate limiting step in protein synthesis and key to gene expression control 1 but despite this centrality it remains poorly understood 2 3. Here we introduce ribosome complex profiling RCP seq to capture the transcriptome wide occupancy of scanning initiating elongating and terminating ribosome complexes in a higher eukaryote. We track scanning and elongating ribosomes across all five prime UTRs in zebrafish which enable us to assess the individual regulatory contributions from the three stages of initiation: ribosome recruitment scanning of the five prime UTR and recognition of the start codon. Our data sheds light on small subunit recruitment to mRNAs presenting evidence for the threading model and demonstrates that sequence features regulate this recruitment. We estimate the processivity of scanning ribosomes as they traverse the five prime UTR and show that the repressive effects of upstream open reading frames depend on the efficiency of both translation initiation and termination. Finally we determine the optimal initiation contexts by directly estimating the conversion of scanning to elongating ribosomes and demonstrate specific regulation of translation initiation at the endoplasmic reticulum. Our results open for the possibility of deconvoluting translation initiation into separate stages and provides the first view of global occupancy of ribosomal small subunits in a vertebrate. ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03     Shield 1 SAMEA5752545 Computational Biology Unit ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|External Id:SAMEA5752545|INSDC center name:Computational Biology Unit|INSDC first public:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|INSDC last update:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:8|common name:zebrafish|dev stage:Shield|sample name:8|scientific name:Danio rerio                 NextSeq 500 sequencing ena EXPERIMENT Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 25 Shield 1 F12 None RCP seq   OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC other SINGLE ILLUMINA NextSeq 500   ERP116106 NextSeq 500 sequencing ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 08 22     1304618128.0 17166028.0 ena RUN Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 25 0:76 A:651341516;C:270458496;G:243929520;T:138874830;N:13766 76       651341516 270458496 243929520 138874830 13766 ERX3511288 ERS3556004 ERA2100634 Computational Biology Unit|European Nucleotide Archive Computational Biology Unit 1 0.64293   0.38159   0.99886   0.07313   76   B   usable mapping rate illumina nextseq unknown other unknown bulk unknown unknown   Unknown 2019-07-03 Gastrula Embryo Undetermined Embryo Imprecise
9738 9738 ERR3489872 ERX3511287 ERS3556004 ERP116106 PRJEB33323 Deconstructing the individual steps of vertebrate translation initiation ena-STUDY-Computational Biology Unit-03-07-2019-10:11:34:314-422 Other In eukaryotes the number of ribosomes synthesizing a given protein depends on how many are recruited to its mRNA their success in navigating its five prime untranslated region UTR and whether they recognize its start codon. Initiation of translation is a rate limiting step in protein synthesis and key to gene expression control 1 but despite this centrality it remains poorly understood 2 3. Here we introduce ribosome complex profiling RCP seq to capture the transcriptome wide occupancy of scanning initiating elongating and terminating ribosome complexes in a higher eukaryote. We track scanning and elongating ribosomes across all five prime UTRs in zebrafish which enable us to assess the individual regulatory contributions from the three stages of initiation: ribosome recruitment scanning of the five prime UTR and recognition of the start codon. Our data sheds light on small subunit recruitment to mRNAs presenting evidence for the threading model and demonstrates that sequence features regulate this recruitment. We estimate the processivity of scanning ribosomes as they traverse the five prime UTR and show that the repressive effects of upstream open reading frames depend on the efficiency of both translation initiation and termination. Finally we determine the optimal initiation contexts by directly estimating the conversion of scanning to elongating ribosomes and demonstrate specific regulation of translation initiation at the endoplasmic reticulum. Our results open for the possibility of deconvoluting translation initiation into separate stages and provides the first view of global occupancy of ribosomal small subunits in a vertebrate. ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03     Shield 1 SAMEA5752545 Computational Biology Unit ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|External Id:SAMEA5752545|INSDC center name:Computational Biology Unit|INSDC first public:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|INSDC last update:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:8|common name:zebrafish|dev stage:Shield|sample name:8|scientific name:Danio rerio                 NextSeq 500 sequencing ena EXPERIMENT Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 24 Shield 1 F10 None RCP seq   OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC other SINGLE ILLUMINA NextSeq 500   ERP116106 NextSeq 500 sequencing ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 08 22     1336115948.0 17580473.0 ena RUN Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 24 0:76 A:608634206;C:295943144;G:286494431;T:145029697;N:14470 76       608634206 295943144 286494431 145029697 14470 ERX3511287 ERS3556004 ERA2100634 Computational Biology Unit|European Nucleotide Archive Computational Biology Unit 1 0.68758   0.47517   0.99898   0.02301   76   B   usable mapping rate illumina nextseq unknown other unknown bulk unknown unknown   Unknown 2019-07-03 Gastrula Embryo Undetermined Embryo Imprecise
9739 9739 ERR3489871 ERX3511286 ERS3556004 ERP116106 PRJEB33323 Deconstructing the individual steps of vertebrate translation initiation ena-STUDY-Computational Biology Unit-03-07-2019-10:11:34:314-422 Other In eukaryotes the number of ribosomes synthesizing a given protein depends on how many are recruited to its mRNA their success in navigating its five prime untranslated region UTR and whether they recognize its start codon. Initiation of translation is a rate limiting step in protein synthesis and key to gene expression control 1 but despite this centrality it remains poorly understood 2 3. Here we introduce ribosome complex profiling RCP seq to capture the transcriptome wide occupancy of scanning initiating elongating and terminating ribosome complexes in a higher eukaryote. We track scanning and elongating ribosomes across all five prime UTRs in zebrafish which enable us to assess the individual regulatory contributions from the three stages of initiation: ribosome recruitment scanning of the five prime UTR and recognition of the start codon. Our data sheds light on small subunit recruitment to mRNAs presenting evidence for the threading model and demonstrates that sequence features regulate this recruitment. We estimate the processivity of scanning ribosomes as they traverse the five prime UTR and show that the repressive effects of upstream open reading frames depend on the efficiency of both translation initiation and termination. Finally we determine the optimal initiation contexts by directly estimating the conversion of scanning to elongating ribosomes and demonstrate specific regulation of translation initiation at the endoplasmic reticulum. Our results open for the possibility of deconvoluting translation initiation into separate stages and provides the first view of global occupancy of ribosomal small subunits in a vertebrate. ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03     Shield 1 SAMEA5752545 Computational Biology Unit ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|External Id:SAMEA5752545|INSDC center name:Computational Biology Unit|INSDC first public:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|INSDC last update:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:8|common name:zebrafish|dev stage:Shield|sample name:8|scientific name:Danio rerio                 NextSeq 500 sequencing ena EXPERIMENT Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 23 Shield 1 F9 None RCP seq   OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC other SINGLE ILLUMINA NextSeq 500   ERP116106 NextSeq 500 sequencing ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 08 22     1434402492.0 18873717.0 ena RUN Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 23 0:76 A:658705664;C:297967081;G:295595736;T:182118632;N:15379 76       658705664 297967081 295595736 182118632 15379 ERX3511286 ERS3556004 ERA2100634 Computational Biology Unit|European Nucleotide Archive Computational Biology Unit 1 0.74246   0.44235   0.99701   0.03112   76   B   usable mapping rate illumina nextseq unknown other unknown bulk unknown unknown   Unknown 2019-07-03 Gastrula Embryo Undetermined Embryo Imprecise
9740 9740 ERR3489870 ERX3511285 ERS3556007 ERP116106 PRJEB33323 Deconstructing the individual steps of vertebrate translation initiation ena-STUDY-Computational Biology Unit-03-07-2019-10:11:34:314-422 Other In eukaryotes the number of ribosomes synthesizing a given protein depends on how many are recruited to its mRNA their success in navigating its five prime untranslated region UTR and whether they recognize its start codon. Initiation of translation is a rate limiting step in protein synthesis and key to gene expression control 1 but despite this centrality it remains poorly understood 2 3. Here we introduce ribosome complex profiling RCP seq to capture the transcriptome wide occupancy of scanning initiating elongating and terminating ribosome complexes in a higher eukaryote. We track scanning and elongating ribosomes across all five prime UTRs in zebrafish which enable us to assess the individual regulatory contributions from the three stages of initiation: ribosome recruitment scanning of the five prime UTR and recognition of the start codon. Our data sheds light on small subunit recruitment to mRNAs presenting evidence for the threading model and demonstrates that sequence features regulate this recruitment. We estimate the processivity of scanning ribosomes as they traverse the five prime UTR and show that the repressive effects of upstream open reading frames depend on the efficiency of both translation initiation and termination. Finally we determine the optimal initiation contexts by directly estimating the conversion of scanning to elongating ribosomes and demonstrate specific regulation of translation initiation at the endoplasmic reticulum. Our results open for the possibility of deconvoluting translation initiation into separate stages and provides the first view of global occupancy of ribosomal small subunits in a vertebrate. ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03     Shield 4150NT SAMEA5752548 Computational Biology Unit ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|External Id:SAMEA5752548|INSDC center name:Computational Biology Unit|INSDC first public:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|INSDC last update:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:11|common name:zebrafish|dev stage:Shield|sample name:11|scientific name:Danio rerio                 NextSeq 500 sequencing ena EXPERIMENT Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 22 Shield 4150NT LSU None RCP seq   OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC other SINGLE ILLUMINA NextSeq 500   ERP116106 NextSeq 500 sequencing ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 08 24     24063208094.0 159358994.0 ena RUN Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 22 0:151 A:7153064588;C:5242791119;G:8513736630;T:3152547276;N:1068481 151       7153064588 5242791119 8513736630 3152547276 1068481 ERX3511285 ERS3556007 ERA2100634 Computational Biology Unit|European Nucleotide Archive Computational Biology Unit 1 0.81267   0.27138   0.99868   0.91938   151   B   usable mapping rate illumina nextseq unknown other unknown bulk unknown unknown   Unknown 2019-07-03 Gastrula Embryo Undetermined Embryo Imprecise
9741 9741 ERR3489869 ERX3511284 ERS3556007 ERP116106 PRJEB33323 Deconstructing the individual steps of vertebrate translation initiation ena-STUDY-Computational Biology Unit-03-07-2019-10:11:34:314-422 Other In eukaryotes the number of ribosomes synthesizing a given protein depends on how many are recruited to its mRNA their success in navigating its five prime untranslated region UTR and whether they recognize its start codon. Initiation of translation is a rate limiting step in protein synthesis and key to gene expression control 1 but despite this centrality it remains poorly understood 2 3. Here we introduce ribosome complex profiling RCP seq to capture the transcriptome wide occupancy of scanning initiating elongating and terminating ribosome complexes in a higher eukaryote. We track scanning and elongating ribosomes across all five prime UTRs in zebrafish which enable us to assess the individual regulatory contributions from the three stages of initiation: ribosome recruitment scanning of the five prime UTR and recognition of the start codon. Our data sheds light on small subunit recruitment to mRNAs presenting evidence for the threading model and demonstrates that sequence features regulate this recruitment. We estimate the processivity of scanning ribosomes as they traverse the five prime UTR and show that the repressive effects of upstream open reading frames depend on the efficiency of both translation initiation and termination. Finally we determine the optimal initiation contexts by directly estimating the conversion of scanning to elongating ribosomes and demonstrate specific regulation of translation initiation at the endoplasmic reticulum. Our results open for the possibility of deconvoluting translation initiation into separate stages and provides the first view of global occupancy of ribosomal small subunits in a vertebrate. ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03     Shield 4150NT SAMEA5752548 Computational Biology Unit ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|External Id:SAMEA5752548|INSDC center name:Computational Biology Unit|INSDC first public:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|INSDC last update:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:11|common name:zebrafish|dev stage:Shield|sample name:11|scientific name:Danio rerio                 NextSeq 500 sequencing ena EXPERIMENT Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 21 Shield 4150NT SSU None RCP seq   OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC other SINGLE ILLUMINA NextSeq 500   ERP116106 NextSeq 500 sequencing ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 08 24     14987998619.0 99258269.0 ena RUN Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 21 0:151 A:4578051806;C:2616328922;G:5914185813;T:1878780090;N:651988 151       4578051806 2616328922 5914185813 1878780090 651988 ERX3511284 ERS3556007 ERA2100634 Computational Biology Unit|European Nucleotide Archive Computational Biology Unit 1 0.77096   0.5278   0.99833   0.42635   151   B   usable mapping rate illumina nextseq unknown other unknown bulk unknown unknown   Unknown 2019-07-03 Gastrula Embryo Undetermined Embryo Imprecise
9742 9742 ERR3489868 ERX3511283 ERS3556003 ERP116106 PRJEB33323 Deconstructing the individual steps of vertebrate translation initiation ena-STUDY-Computational Biology Unit-03-07-2019-10:11:34:314-422 Other In eukaryotes the number of ribosomes synthesizing a given protein depends on how many are recruited to its mRNA their success in navigating its five prime untranslated region UTR and whether they recognize its start codon. Initiation of translation is a rate limiting step in protein synthesis and key to gene expression control 1 but despite this centrality it remains poorly understood 2 3. Here we introduce ribosome complex profiling RCP seq to capture the transcriptome wide occupancy of scanning initiating elongating and terminating ribosome complexes in a higher eukaryote. We track scanning and elongating ribosomes across all five prime UTRs in zebrafish which enable us to assess the individual regulatory contributions from the three stages of initiation: ribosome recruitment scanning of the five prime UTR and recognition of the start codon. Our data sheds light on small subunit recruitment to mRNAs presenting evidence for the threading model and demonstrates that sequence features regulate this recruitment. We estimate the processivity of scanning ribosomes as they traverse the five prime UTR and show that the repressive effects of upstream open reading frames depend on the efficiency of both translation initiation and termination. Finally we determine the optimal initiation contexts by directly estimating the conversion of scanning to elongating ribosomes and demonstrate specific regulation of translation initiation at the endoplasmic reticulum. Our results open for the possibility of deconvoluting translation initiation into separate stages and provides the first view of global occupancy of ribosomal small subunits in a vertebrate. ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03     64 cell 4Ei 10 SAMEA5752544 Computational Biology Unit ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|External Id:SAMEA5752544|INSDC center name:Computational Biology Unit|INSDC first public:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|INSDC last update:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:7|common name:zebrafish|dev stage:64 cell|sample name:7|scientific name:Danio rerio                 NextSeq 500 sequencing ena EXPERIMENT Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 20 64 cell 4Ei 10 SSU None RCP seq   OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC other SINGLE ILLUMINA NextSeq 500   ERP116106 NextSeq 500 sequencing ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 08 22     5928054796.0 78000721.0 ena RUN Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 20 0:76 A:2109854905;C:1377083508;G:1616166285;T:824889630;N:60468 76       2109854905 1377083508 1616166285 824889630 60468 ERX3511283 ERS3556003 ERA2100634 Computational Biology Unit|European Nucleotide Archive Computational Biology Unit 1 0.61525   0.45233   0.99379   0.57373   76   B   usable mapping rate illumina nextseq unknown other unknown bulk unknown unknown   Unknown 2019-07-03 Cleavage Embryo Undetermined Embryo Imprecise
9743 9743 ERR3489867 ERX3511282 ERS3556003 ERP116106 PRJEB33323 Deconstructing the individual steps of vertebrate translation initiation ena-STUDY-Computational Biology Unit-03-07-2019-10:11:34:314-422 Other In eukaryotes the number of ribosomes synthesizing a given protein depends on how many are recruited to its mRNA their success in navigating its five prime untranslated region UTR and whether they recognize its start codon. Initiation of translation is a rate limiting step in protein synthesis and key to gene expression control 1 but despite this centrality it remains poorly understood 2 3. Here we introduce ribosome complex profiling RCP seq to capture the transcriptome wide occupancy of scanning initiating elongating and terminating ribosome complexes in a higher eukaryote. We track scanning and elongating ribosomes across all five prime UTRs in zebrafish which enable us to assess the individual regulatory contributions from the three stages of initiation: ribosome recruitment scanning of the five prime UTR and recognition of the start codon. Our data sheds light on small subunit recruitment to mRNAs presenting evidence for the threading model and demonstrates that sequence features regulate this recruitment. We estimate the processivity of scanning ribosomes as they traverse the five prime UTR and show that the repressive effects of upstream open reading frames depend on the efficiency of both translation initiation and termination. Finally we determine the optimal initiation contexts by directly estimating the conversion of scanning to elongating ribosomes and demonstrate specific regulation of translation initiation at the endoplasmic reticulum. Our results open for the possibility of deconvoluting translation initiation into separate stages and provides the first view of global occupancy of ribosomal small subunits in a vertebrate. ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03     64 cell 4Ei 10 SAMEA5752544 Computational Biology Unit ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|External Id:SAMEA5752544|INSDC center name:Computational Biology Unit|INSDC first public:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|INSDC last update:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:7|common name:zebrafish|dev stage:64 cell|sample name:7|scientific name:Danio rerio                 NextSeq 500 sequencing ena EXPERIMENT Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 19 64 cell 4Ei 10 SSU None RCP seq   OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC other SINGLE ILLUMINA NextSeq 500   ERP116106 NextSeq 500 sequencing ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 08 22     9772604780.0 128586905.0 ena RUN Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 19 0:76 A:3901301079;C:2223067879;G:2553338016;T:1094797648;N:100158 76       3901301079 2223067879 2553338016 1094797648 100158 ERX3511282 ERS3556003 ERA2100634 Computational Biology Unit|European Nucleotide Archive Computational Biology Unit 1 0.52103   0.25046   0.9861   0.64575   76   B   usable mapping rate illumina nextseq unknown other unknown bulk unknown unknown   Unknown 2019-07-03 Cleavage Embryo Undetermined Embryo Imprecise
9744 9744 ERR3489866 ERX3511281 ERS3556002 ERP116106 PRJEB33323 Deconstructing the individual steps of vertebrate translation initiation ena-STUDY-Computational Biology Unit-03-07-2019-10:11:34:314-422 Other In eukaryotes the number of ribosomes synthesizing a given protein depends on how many are recruited to its mRNA their success in navigating its five prime untranslated region UTR and whether they recognize its start codon. Initiation of translation is a rate limiting step in protein synthesis and key to gene expression control 1 but despite this centrality it remains poorly understood 2 3. Here we introduce ribosome complex profiling RCP seq to capture the transcriptome wide occupancy of scanning initiating elongating and terminating ribosome complexes in a higher eukaryote. We track scanning and elongating ribosomes across all five prime UTRs in zebrafish which enable us to assess the individual regulatory contributions from the three stages of initiation: ribosome recruitment scanning of the five prime UTR and recognition of the start codon. Our data sheds light on small subunit recruitment to mRNAs presenting evidence for the threading model and demonstrates that sequence features regulate this recruitment. We estimate the processivity of scanning ribosomes as they traverse the five prime UTR and show that the repressive effects of upstream open reading frames depend on the efficiency of both translation initiation and termination. Finally we determine the optimal initiation contexts by directly estimating the conversion of scanning to elongating ribosomes and demonstrate specific regulation of translation initiation at the endoplasmic reticulum. Our results open for the possibility of deconvoluting translation initiation into separate stages and provides the first view of global occupancy of ribosomal small subunits in a vertebrate. ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03     64 cell 4Ei 0.1 SAMEA5752543 Computational Biology Unit ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|External Id:SAMEA5752543|INSDC center name:Computational Biology Unit|INSDC first public:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|INSDC last update:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:6|common name:zebrafish|dev stage:64 cell|sample name:6|scientific name:Danio rerio                 NextSeq 500 sequencing ena EXPERIMENT Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 18 64 cell 4Ei 0.1 LSU None RCP seq   OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC other SINGLE ILLUMINA NextSeq 500   ERP116106 NextSeq 500 sequencing ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 09 26     6730725680.0 88562180.0 ena RUN Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 18 0:76 A:3805722011;C:1188715051;G:1382258076;T:353814168;N:216374 76       3805722011 1188715051 1382258076 353814168 216374 ERX3511281 ERS3556002 ERA2100634 Computational Biology Unit|European Nucleotide Archive Computational Biology Unit 1 0.61922   0.37217   0.99527   0.29148   76   B   usable mapping rate illumina nextseq unknown other unknown bulk unknown unknown   Unknown 2019-07-03 Cleavage Embryo Undetermined Embryo Imprecise
9745 9745 ERR3489865 ERX3511280 ERS3556002 ERP116106 PRJEB33323 Deconstructing the individual steps of vertebrate translation initiation ena-STUDY-Computational Biology Unit-03-07-2019-10:11:34:314-422 Other In eukaryotes the number of ribosomes synthesizing a given protein depends on how many are recruited to its mRNA their success in navigating its five prime untranslated region UTR and whether they recognize its start codon. Initiation of translation is a rate limiting step in protein synthesis and key to gene expression control 1 but despite this centrality it remains poorly understood 2 3. Here we introduce ribosome complex profiling RCP seq to capture the transcriptome wide occupancy of scanning initiating elongating and terminating ribosome complexes in a higher eukaryote. We track scanning and elongating ribosomes across all five prime UTRs in zebrafish which enable us to assess the individual regulatory contributions from the three stages of initiation: ribosome recruitment scanning of the five prime UTR and recognition of the start codon. Our data sheds light on small subunit recruitment to mRNAs presenting evidence for the threading model and demonstrates that sequence features regulate this recruitment. We estimate the processivity of scanning ribosomes as they traverse the five prime UTR and show that the repressive effects of upstream open reading frames depend on the efficiency of both translation initiation and termination. Finally we determine the optimal initiation contexts by directly estimating the conversion of scanning to elongating ribosomes and demonstrate specific regulation of translation initiation at the endoplasmic reticulum. Our results open for the possibility of deconvoluting translation initiation into separate stages and provides the first view of global occupancy of ribosomal small subunits in a vertebrate. ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03     64 cell 4Ei 0.1 SAMEA5752543 Computational Biology Unit ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|External Id:SAMEA5752543|INSDC center name:Computational Biology Unit|INSDC first public:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|INSDC last update:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:6|common name:zebrafish|dev stage:64 cell|sample name:6|scientific name:Danio rerio                 NextSeq 500 sequencing ena EXPERIMENT Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 17 64 cell 4Ei 0.1 SSU None RCP seq   OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC other SINGLE ILLUMINA NextSeq 500   ERP116106 NextSeq 500 sequencing ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 09 26     10616304872.0 139688222.0 ena RUN Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 17 0:76 A:4717003484;C:2600725234;G:2586105174;T:712124440;N:346540 76       4717003484 2600725234 2586105174 712124440 346540 ERX3511280 ERS3556002 ERA2100634 Computational Biology Unit|European Nucleotide Archive Computational Biology Unit 1 0.30908   0.08252   0.94683   0.69548   76   B   usable mapping rate illumina nextseq unknown other unknown bulk unknown unknown   Unknown 2019-07-03 Cleavage Embryo Undetermined Embryo Imprecise
9746 9746 ERR3489864 ERX3511279 ERS3556006 ERP116106 PRJEB33323 Deconstructing the individual steps of vertebrate translation initiation ena-STUDY-Computational Biology Unit-03-07-2019-10:11:34:314-422 Other In eukaryotes the number of ribosomes synthesizing a given protein depends on how many are recruited to its mRNA their success in navigating its five prime untranslated region UTR and whether they recognize its start codon. Initiation of translation is a rate limiting step in protein synthesis and key to gene expression control 1 but despite this centrality it remains poorly understood 2 3. Here we introduce ribosome complex profiling RCP seq to capture the transcriptome wide occupancy of scanning initiating elongating and terminating ribosome complexes in a higher eukaryote. We track scanning and elongating ribosomes across all five prime UTRs in zebrafish which enable us to assess the individual regulatory contributions from the three stages of initiation: ribosome recruitment scanning of the five prime UTR and recognition of the start codon. Our data sheds light on small subunit recruitment to mRNAs presenting evidence for the threading model and demonstrates that sequence features regulate this recruitment. We estimate the processivity of scanning ribosomes as they traverse the five prime UTR and show that the repressive effects of upstream open reading frames depend on the efficiency of both translation initiation and termination. Finally we determine the optimal initiation contexts by directly estimating the conversion of scanning to elongating ribosomes and demonstrate specific regulation of translation initiation at the endoplasmic reticulum. Our results open for the possibility of deconvoluting translation initiation into separate stages and provides the first view of global occupancy of ribosomal small subunits in a vertebrate. ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03     Shield 3 SAMEA5752547 Computational Biology Unit ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|External Id:SAMEA5752547|INSDC center name:Computational Biology Unit|INSDC first public:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|INSDC last update:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:10|common name:zebrafish|dev stage:Shield|sample name:10|scientific name:Danio rerio                 NextSeq 500 sequencing ena EXPERIMENT Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 16 Shield 3 LSU None RCP seq   OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC other SINGLE ILLUMINA NextSeq 500   ERP116106 NextSeq 500 sequencing ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 08 22     11777220072.0 154963422.0 ena RUN Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 16 0:76 A:3368038444;C:3190496935;G:3529701152;T:1688766119;N:217422 76       3368038444 3190496935 3529701152 1688766119 217422 ERX3511279 ERS3556006 ERA2100634 Computational Biology Unit|European Nucleotide Archive Computational Biology Unit 1 0.70681   0.18846   0.99332   0.71978   76   B   usable mapping rate illumina nextseq unknown other unknown bulk unknown unknown   Unknown 2019-07-03 Gastrula Embryo Undetermined Embryo Imprecise
9747 9747 ERR3489863 ERX3511278 ERS3556006 ERP116106 PRJEB33323 Deconstructing the individual steps of vertebrate translation initiation ena-STUDY-Computational Biology Unit-03-07-2019-10:11:34:314-422 Other In eukaryotes the number of ribosomes synthesizing a given protein depends on how many are recruited to its mRNA their success in navigating its five prime untranslated region UTR and whether they recognize its start codon. Initiation of translation is a rate limiting step in protein synthesis and key to gene expression control 1 but despite this centrality it remains poorly understood 2 3. Here we introduce ribosome complex profiling RCP seq to capture the transcriptome wide occupancy of scanning initiating elongating and terminating ribosome complexes in a higher eukaryote. We track scanning and elongating ribosomes across all five prime UTRs in zebrafish which enable us to assess the individual regulatory contributions from the three stages of initiation: ribosome recruitment scanning of the five prime UTR and recognition of the start codon. Our data sheds light on small subunit recruitment to mRNAs presenting evidence for the threading model and demonstrates that sequence features regulate this recruitment. We estimate the processivity of scanning ribosomes as they traverse the five prime UTR and show that the repressive effects of upstream open reading frames depend on the efficiency of both translation initiation and termination. Finally we determine the optimal initiation contexts by directly estimating the conversion of scanning to elongating ribosomes and demonstrate specific regulation of translation initiation at the endoplasmic reticulum. Our results open for the possibility of deconvoluting translation initiation into separate stages and provides the first view of global occupancy of ribosomal small subunits in a vertebrate. ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03     Shield 3 SAMEA5752547 Computational Biology Unit ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|External Id:SAMEA5752547|INSDC center name:Computational Biology Unit|INSDC first public:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|INSDC last update:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:10|common name:zebrafish|dev stage:Shield|sample name:10|scientific name:Danio rerio                 NextSeq 500 sequencing ena EXPERIMENT Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 15 Shield 3 SSU None RCP seq   OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC other SINGLE ILLUMINA NextSeq 500   ERP116106 NextSeq 500 sequencing ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 08 22     7920419952.0 104216052.0 ena RUN Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 15 0:76 A:2990167185;C:1767708808;G:2104830363;T:1057568560;N:145036 76       2990167185 1767708808 2104830363 1057568560 145036 ERX3511278 ERS3556006 ERA2100634 Computational Biology Unit|European Nucleotide Archive Computational Biology Unit 1 0.5052   0.30841   0.99129   0.60948   76   B   usable mapping rate illumina nextseq unknown other unknown bulk unknown unknown   Unknown 2019-07-03 Gastrula Embryo Undetermined Embryo Imprecise
9748 9748 ERR3489862 ERX3511277 ERS3556005 ERP116106 PRJEB33323 Deconstructing the individual steps of vertebrate translation initiation ena-STUDY-Computational Biology Unit-03-07-2019-10:11:34:314-422 Other In eukaryotes the number of ribosomes synthesizing a given protein depends on how many are recruited to its mRNA their success in navigating its five prime untranslated region UTR and whether they recognize its start codon. Initiation of translation is a rate limiting step in protein synthesis and key to gene expression control 1 but despite this centrality it remains poorly understood 2 3. Here we introduce ribosome complex profiling RCP seq to capture the transcriptome wide occupancy of scanning initiating elongating and terminating ribosome complexes in a higher eukaryote. We track scanning and elongating ribosomes across all five prime UTRs in zebrafish which enable us to assess the individual regulatory contributions from the three stages of initiation: ribosome recruitment scanning of the five prime UTR and recognition of the start codon. Our data sheds light on small subunit recruitment to mRNAs presenting evidence for the threading model and demonstrates that sequence features regulate this recruitment. We estimate the processivity of scanning ribosomes as they traverse the five prime UTR and show that the repressive effects of upstream open reading frames depend on the efficiency of both translation initiation and termination. Finally we determine the optimal initiation contexts by directly estimating the conversion of scanning to elongating ribosomes and demonstrate specific regulation of translation initiation at the endoplasmic reticulum. Our results open for the possibility of deconvoluting translation initiation into separate stages and provides the first view of global occupancy of ribosomal small subunits in a vertebrate. ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03     Shield 2 SAMEA5752546 Computational Biology Unit ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|External Id:SAMEA5752546|INSDC center name:Computational Biology Unit|INSDC first public:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|INSDC last update:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:9|common name:zebrafish|dev stage:Shield|sample name:9|scientific name:Danio rerio                 NextSeq 500 sequencing ena EXPERIMENT Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 14 Shield 2 LSU None RCP seq   OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC other SINGLE ILLUMINA NextSeq 500   ERP116106 NextSeq 500 sequencing ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 08 22     9775297004.0 128622329.0 ena RUN Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 14 0:76 A:4750565405;C:2540992255;G:1698817649;T:784832634;N:89061 76       4750565405 2540992255 1698817649 784832634 89061 ERX3511277 ERS3556005 ERA2100634 Computational Biology Unit|European Nucleotide Archive Computational Biology Unit 1 0.74003   0.5616   0.99855   0.03607   76   B   usable mapping rate illumina nextseq unknown other unknown bulk unknown unknown   Unknown 2019-07-03 Gastrula Embryo Undetermined Embryo Imprecise
9749 9749 ERR3489861 ERX3511276 ERS3556005 ERP116106 PRJEB33323 Deconstructing the individual steps of vertebrate translation initiation ena-STUDY-Computational Biology Unit-03-07-2019-10:11:34:314-422 Other In eukaryotes the number of ribosomes synthesizing a given protein depends on how many are recruited to its mRNA their success in navigating its five prime untranslated region UTR and whether they recognize its start codon. Initiation of translation is a rate limiting step in protein synthesis and key to gene expression control 1 but despite this centrality it remains poorly understood 2 3. Here we introduce ribosome complex profiling RCP seq to capture the transcriptome wide occupancy of scanning initiating elongating and terminating ribosome complexes in a higher eukaryote. We track scanning and elongating ribosomes across all five prime UTRs in zebrafish which enable us to assess the individual regulatory contributions from the three stages of initiation: ribosome recruitment scanning of the five prime UTR and recognition of the start codon. Our data sheds light on small subunit recruitment to mRNAs presenting evidence for the threading model and demonstrates that sequence features regulate this recruitment. We estimate the processivity of scanning ribosomes as they traverse the five prime UTR and show that the repressive effects of upstream open reading frames depend on the efficiency of both translation initiation and termination. Finally we determine the optimal initiation contexts by directly estimating the conversion of scanning to elongating ribosomes and demonstrate specific regulation of translation initiation at the endoplasmic reticulum. Our results open for the possibility of deconvoluting translation initiation into separate stages and provides the first view of global occupancy of ribosomal small subunits in a vertebrate. ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03     Shield 2 SAMEA5752546 Computational Biology Unit ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|External Id:SAMEA5752546|INSDC center name:Computational Biology Unit|INSDC first public:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|INSDC last update:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:9|common name:zebrafish|dev stage:Shield|sample name:9|scientific name:Danio rerio                 NextSeq 500 sequencing ena EXPERIMENT Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 13 Shield 2 SSU None RCP seq   OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC other SINGLE ILLUMINA NextSeq 500   ERP116106 NextSeq 500 sequencing ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 08 22     8210103300.0 108027675.0 ena RUN Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 13 0:76 A:3300825043;C:2576709678;G:1707115198;T:625376255;N:77126 76       3300825043 2576709678 1707115198 625376255 77126 ERX3511276 ERS3556005 ERA2100634 Computational Biology Unit|European Nucleotide Archive Computational Biology Unit 1 0.2787   0.17583   0.99752   0.50171   76   B   usable mapping rate illumina nextseq unknown other unknown bulk unknown unknown   Unknown 2019-07-03 Gastrula Embryo Undetermined Embryo Imprecise
9750 9750 ERR3489860 ERX3511275 ERS3556004 ERP116106 PRJEB33323 Deconstructing the individual steps of vertebrate translation initiation ena-STUDY-Computational Biology Unit-03-07-2019-10:11:34:314-422 Other In eukaryotes the number of ribosomes synthesizing a given protein depends on how many are recruited to its mRNA their success in navigating its five prime untranslated region UTR and whether they recognize its start codon. Initiation of translation is a rate limiting step in protein synthesis and key to gene expression control 1 but despite this centrality it remains poorly understood 2 3. Here we introduce ribosome complex profiling RCP seq to capture the transcriptome wide occupancy of scanning initiating elongating and terminating ribosome complexes in a higher eukaryote. We track scanning and elongating ribosomes across all five prime UTRs in zebrafish which enable us to assess the individual regulatory contributions from the three stages of initiation: ribosome recruitment scanning of the five prime UTR and recognition of the start codon. Our data sheds light on small subunit recruitment to mRNAs presenting evidence for the threading model and demonstrates that sequence features regulate this recruitment. We estimate the processivity of scanning ribosomes as they traverse the five prime UTR and show that the repressive effects of upstream open reading frames depend on the efficiency of both translation initiation and termination. Finally we determine the optimal initiation contexts by directly estimating the conversion of scanning to elongating ribosomes and demonstrate specific regulation of translation initiation at the endoplasmic reticulum. Our results open for the possibility of deconvoluting translation initiation into separate stages and provides the first view of global occupancy of ribosomal small subunits in a vertebrate. ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03     Shield 1 SAMEA5752545 Computational Biology Unit ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|External Id:SAMEA5752545|INSDC center name:Computational Biology Unit|INSDC first public:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|INSDC last update:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:8|common name:zebrafish|dev stage:Shield|sample name:8|scientific name:Danio rerio                 NextSeq 500 sequencing ena EXPERIMENT Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 12 Shield 1 LSU None RCP seq   OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC other SINGLE ILLUMINA NextSeq 500   ERP116106 NextSeq 500 sequencing ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 08 22     2437679936.0 32074736.0 ena RUN Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 12 0:76 A:764355184;C:710492003;G:664031460;T:298777374;N:23915 76       764355184 710492003 664031460 298777374 23915 ERX3511275 ERS3556004 ERA2100634 Computational Biology Unit|European Nucleotide Archive Computational Biology Unit 1 0.0406   0.02417   0.99908   0.61299   76   B   usable mapping rate illumina nextseq unknown other unknown bulk unknown unknown   Unknown 2019-07-03 Gastrula Embryo Undetermined Embryo Imprecise
9751 9751 ERR3489859 ERX3511274 ERS3556004 ERP116106 PRJEB33323 Deconstructing the individual steps of vertebrate translation initiation ena-STUDY-Computational Biology Unit-03-07-2019-10:11:34:314-422 Other In eukaryotes the number of ribosomes synthesizing a given protein depends on how many are recruited to its mRNA their success in navigating its five prime untranslated region UTR and whether they recognize its start codon. Initiation of translation is a rate limiting step in protein synthesis and key to gene expression control 1 but despite this centrality it remains poorly understood 2 3. Here we introduce ribosome complex profiling RCP seq to capture the transcriptome wide occupancy of scanning initiating elongating and terminating ribosome complexes in a higher eukaryote. We track scanning and elongating ribosomes across all five prime UTRs in zebrafish which enable us to assess the individual regulatory contributions from the three stages of initiation: ribosome recruitment scanning of the five prime UTR and recognition of the start codon. Our data sheds light on small subunit recruitment to mRNAs presenting evidence for the threading model and demonstrates that sequence features regulate this recruitment. We estimate the processivity of scanning ribosomes as they traverse the five prime UTR and show that the repressive effects of upstream open reading frames depend on the efficiency of both translation initiation and termination. Finally we determine the optimal initiation contexts by directly estimating the conversion of scanning to elongating ribosomes and demonstrate specific regulation of translation initiation at the endoplasmic reticulum. Our results open for the possibility of deconvoluting translation initiation into separate stages and provides the first view of global occupancy of ribosomal small subunits in a vertebrate. ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03     Shield 1 SAMEA5752545 Computational Biology Unit ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|External Id:SAMEA5752545|INSDC center name:Computational Biology Unit|INSDC first public:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|INSDC last update:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:8|common name:zebrafish|dev stage:Shield|sample name:8|scientific name:Danio rerio                 NextSeq 500 sequencing ena EXPERIMENT Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 11 Shield 1 SSU None RCP seq   OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC other SINGLE ILLUMINA NextSeq 500   ERP116106 NextSeq 500 sequencing ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 08 22     3157243376.0 41542676.0 ena RUN Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 11 0:76 A:1443205052;C:715251024;G:633421305;T:365333650;N:32345 76       1443205052 715251024 633421305 365333650 32345 ERX3511274 ERS3556004 ERA2100634 Computational Biology Unit|European Nucleotide Archive Computational Biology Unit 1 0.47643   0.27944   0.99896   0.11464   76   B   usable mapping rate illumina nextseq unknown other unknown bulk unknown unknown   Unknown 2019-07-03 Gastrula Embryo Undetermined Embryo Imprecise
9752 9752 ERR3489858 ERX3511273 ERS3556001 ERP116106 PRJEB33323 Deconstructing the individual steps of vertebrate translation initiation ena-STUDY-Computational Biology Unit-03-07-2019-10:11:34:314-422 Other In eukaryotes the number of ribosomes synthesizing a given protein depends on how many are recruited to its mRNA their success in navigating its five prime untranslated region UTR and whether they recognize its start codon. Initiation of translation is a rate limiting step in protein synthesis and key to gene expression control 1 but despite this centrality it remains poorly understood 2 3. Here we introduce ribosome complex profiling RCP seq to capture the transcriptome wide occupancy of scanning initiating elongating and terminating ribosome complexes in a higher eukaryote. We track scanning and elongating ribosomes across all five prime UTRs in zebrafish which enable us to assess the individual regulatory contributions from the three stages of initiation: ribosome recruitment scanning of the five prime UTR and recognition of the start codon. Our data sheds light on small subunit recruitment to mRNAs presenting evidence for the threading model and demonstrates that sequence features regulate this recruitment. We estimate the processivity of scanning ribosomes as they traverse the five prime UTR and show that the repressive effects of upstream open reading frames depend on the efficiency of both translation initiation and termination. Finally we determine the optimal initiation contexts by directly estimating the conversion of scanning to elongating ribosomes and demonstrate specific regulation of translation initiation at the endoplasmic reticulum. Our results open for the possibility of deconvoluting translation initiation into separate stages and provides the first view of global occupancy of ribosomal small subunits in a vertebrate. ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03     Sphere 3 SAMEA5752542 Computational Biology Unit ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|External Id:SAMEA5752542|INSDC center name:Computational Biology Unit|INSDC first public:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|INSDC last update:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:5|common name:zebrafish|dev stage:Sphere|sample name:5|scientific name:Danio rerio                 NextSeq 500 sequencing ena EXPERIMENT Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 10 Sphere 3 LSU None RCP seq   OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC other SINGLE ILLUMINA NextSeq 500   ERP116106 NextSeq 500 sequencing ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 08 22     2740392724.0 36057799.0 ena RUN Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 10 0:76 A:1790452280;C:354001675;G:431182140;T:164697730;N:58899 76       1790452280 354001675 431182140 164697730 58899 ERX3511273 ERS3556001 ERA2100634 Computational Biology Unit|European Nucleotide Archive Computational Biology Unit 1 0.87154   0.5323   0.99793   0.02983   76   B   usable mapping rate illumina nextseq unknown other unknown bulk unknown unknown   Unknown 2019-07-03 Blastula Embryo Undetermined Embryo Imprecise
9753 9753 ERR3489857 ERX3511272 ERS3556001 ERP116106 PRJEB33323 Deconstructing the individual steps of vertebrate translation initiation ena-STUDY-Computational Biology Unit-03-07-2019-10:11:34:314-422 Other In eukaryotes the number of ribosomes synthesizing a given protein depends on how many are recruited to its mRNA their success in navigating its five prime untranslated region UTR and whether they recognize its start codon. Initiation of translation is a rate limiting step in protein synthesis and key to gene expression control 1 but despite this centrality it remains poorly understood 2 3. Here we introduce ribosome complex profiling RCP seq to capture the transcriptome wide occupancy of scanning initiating elongating and terminating ribosome complexes in a higher eukaryote. We track scanning and elongating ribosomes across all five prime UTRs in zebrafish which enable us to assess the individual regulatory contributions from the three stages of initiation: ribosome recruitment scanning of the five prime UTR and recognition of the start codon. Our data sheds light on small subunit recruitment to mRNAs presenting evidence for the threading model and demonstrates that sequence features regulate this recruitment. We estimate the processivity of scanning ribosomes as they traverse the five prime UTR and show that the repressive effects of upstream open reading frames depend on the efficiency of both translation initiation and termination. Finally we determine the optimal initiation contexts by directly estimating the conversion of scanning to elongating ribosomes and demonstrate specific regulation of translation initiation at the endoplasmic reticulum. Our results open for the possibility of deconvoluting translation initiation into separate stages and provides the first view of global occupancy of ribosomal small subunits in a vertebrate. ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03     Sphere 3 SAMEA5752542 Computational Biology Unit ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|External Id:SAMEA5752542|INSDC center name:Computational Biology Unit|INSDC first public:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|INSDC last update:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:5|common name:zebrafish|dev stage:Sphere|sample name:5|scientific name:Danio rerio                 NextSeq 500 sequencing ena EXPERIMENT Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 9 Sphere 3 SSU None RCP seq   OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC other SINGLE ILLUMINA NextSeq 500   ERP116106 NextSeq 500 sequencing ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 08 22     6277242192.0 82595292.0 ena RUN Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 9 0:76 A:3129446012;C:1311888416;G:1369035262;T:466745503;N:126999 76       3129446012 1311888416 1369035262 466745503 126999 ERX3511272 ERS3556001 ERA2100634 Computational Biology Unit|European Nucleotide Archive Computational Biology Unit 1 0.65637   0.35975   0.9936   0.24734   76   B   usable mapping rate illumina nextseq unknown other unknown bulk unknown unknown   Unknown 2019-07-03 Blastula Embryo Undetermined Embryo Imprecise
9754 9754 ERR3489856 ERX3511271 ERS3556000 ERP116106 PRJEB33323 Deconstructing the individual steps of vertebrate translation initiation ena-STUDY-Computational Biology Unit-03-07-2019-10:11:34:314-422 Other In eukaryotes the number of ribosomes synthesizing a given protein depends on how many are recruited to its mRNA their success in navigating its five prime untranslated region UTR and whether they recognize its start codon. Initiation of translation is a rate limiting step in protein synthesis and key to gene expression control 1 but despite this centrality it remains poorly understood 2 3. Here we introduce ribosome complex profiling RCP seq to capture the transcriptome wide occupancy of scanning initiating elongating and terminating ribosome complexes in a higher eukaryote. We track scanning and elongating ribosomes across all five prime UTRs in zebrafish which enable us to assess the individual regulatory contributions from the three stages of initiation: ribosome recruitment scanning of the five prime UTR and recognition of the start codon. Our data sheds light on small subunit recruitment to mRNAs presenting evidence for the threading model and demonstrates that sequence features regulate this recruitment. We estimate the processivity of scanning ribosomes as they traverse the five prime UTR and show that the repressive effects of upstream open reading frames depend on the efficiency of both translation initiation and termination. Finally we determine the optimal initiation contexts by directly estimating the conversion of scanning to elongating ribosomes and demonstrate specific regulation of translation initiation at the endoplasmic reticulum. Our results open for the possibility of deconvoluting translation initiation into separate stages and provides the first view of global occupancy of ribosomal small subunits in a vertebrate. ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03     Sphere 2 SAMEA5752541 Computational Biology Unit ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|External Id:SAMEA5752541|INSDC center name:Computational Biology Unit|INSDC first public:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|INSDC last update:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:4|common name:zebrafish|dev stage:Sphere|sample name:4|scientific name:Danio rerio                 NextSeq 500 sequencing ena EXPERIMENT Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 8 Sphere 2 LSU None RCP seq   OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC other SINGLE ILLUMINA NextSeq 500   ERP116106 NextSeq 500 sequencing ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 08 24     6679993476.0 87894651.0 ena RUN Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 8 0:76 A:3113787833;C:1255798935;G:1750515950;T:559763997;N:126761 76       3113787833 1255798935 1750515950 559763997 126761 ERX3511271 ERS3556000 ERA2100634 Computational Biology Unit|European Nucleotide Archive Computational Biology Unit 1 0.66287   0.41208   0.99602   0.17083   76   B   usable mapping rate illumina nextseq unknown other unknown bulk unknown unknown   Unknown 2019-07-03 Blastula Embryo Undetermined Embryo Imprecise
9755 9755 ERR3489855 ERX3511270 ERS3556000 ERP116106 PRJEB33323 Deconstructing the individual steps of vertebrate translation initiation ena-STUDY-Computational Biology Unit-03-07-2019-10:11:34:314-422 Other In eukaryotes the number of ribosomes synthesizing a given protein depends on how many are recruited to its mRNA their success in navigating its five prime untranslated region UTR and whether they recognize its start codon. Initiation of translation is a rate limiting step in protein synthesis and key to gene expression control 1 but despite this centrality it remains poorly understood 2 3. Here we introduce ribosome complex profiling RCP seq to capture the transcriptome wide occupancy of scanning initiating elongating and terminating ribosome complexes in a higher eukaryote. We track scanning and elongating ribosomes across all five prime UTRs in zebrafish which enable us to assess the individual regulatory contributions from the three stages of initiation: ribosome recruitment scanning of the five prime UTR and recognition of the start codon. Our data sheds light on small subunit recruitment to mRNAs presenting evidence for the threading model and demonstrates that sequence features regulate this recruitment. We estimate the processivity of scanning ribosomes as they traverse the five prime UTR and show that the repressive effects of upstream open reading frames depend on the efficiency of both translation initiation and termination. Finally we determine the optimal initiation contexts by directly estimating the conversion of scanning to elongating ribosomes and demonstrate specific regulation of translation initiation at the endoplasmic reticulum. Our results open for the possibility of deconvoluting translation initiation into separate stages and provides the first view of global occupancy of ribosomal small subunits in a vertebrate. ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03     Sphere 2 SAMEA5752541 Computational Biology Unit ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|External Id:SAMEA5752541|INSDC center name:Computational Biology Unit|INSDC first public:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|INSDC last update:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:4|common name:zebrafish|dev stage:Sphere|sample name:4|scientific name:Danio rerio                 NextSeq 500 sequencing ena EXPERIMENT Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:423 7 Sphere 2 SSU None RCP seq   OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC other SINGLE ILLUMINA NextSeq 500   ERP116106 NextSeq 500 sequencing ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 08 22     13238731764.0 174193839.0 ena RUN Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:424 7 0:76 A:7630016769;C:1835321568;G:2775223283;T:997916159;N:253985 76       7630016769 1835321568 2775223283 997916159 253985 ERX3511270 ERS3556000 ERA2100634 Computational Biology Unit|European Nucleotide Archive Computational Biology Unit 1 0.77269   0.45994   0.99683   0.04249   76   B   usable mapping rate illumina nextseq unknown other unknown bulk unknown unknown   Unknown 2019-07-03 Blastula Embryo Undetermined Embryo Imprecise
9756 9756 ERR3489854 ERX3511269 ERS3555999 ERP116106 PRJEB33323 Deconstructing the individual steps of vertebrate translation initiation ena-STUDY-Computational Biology Unit-03-07-2019-10:11:34:314-422 Other In eukaryotes the number of ribosomes synthesizing a given protein depends on how many are recruited to its mRNA their success in navigating its five prime untranslated region UTR and whether they recognize its start codon. Initiation of translation is a rate limiting step in protein synthesis and key to gene expression control 1 but despite this centrality it remains poorly understood 2 3. Here we introduce ribosome complex profiling RCP seq to capture the transcriptome wide occupancy of scanning initiating elongating and terminating ribosome complexes in a higher eukaryote. We track scanning and elongating ribosomes across all five prime UTRs in zebrafish which enable us to assess the individual regulatory contributions from the three stages of initiation: ribosome recruitment scanning of the five prime UTR and recognition of the start codon. Our data sheds light on small subunit recruitment to mRNAs presenting evidence for the threading model and demonstrates that sequence features regulate this recruitment. We estimate the processivity of scanning ribosomes as they traverse the five prime UTR and show that the repressive effects of upstream open reading frames depend on the efficiency of both translation initiation and termination. Finally we determine the optimal initiation contexts by directly estimating the conversion of scanning to elongating ribosomes and demonstrate specific regulation of translation initiation at the endoplasmic reticulum. Our results open for the possibility of deconvoluting translation initiation into separate stages and provides the first view of global occupancy of ribosomal small subunits in a vertebrate. ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03     Sphere 1 SAMEA5752540 Computational Biology Unit ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|External Id:SAMEA5752540|INSDC center name:Computational Biology Unit|INSDC first public:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|INSDC last update:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:3|common name:zebrafish|dev stage:Sphere|sample name:3|scientific name:Danio rerio                 NextSeq 500 sequencing ena EXPERIMENT Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:423 6 Sphere 1 LSU None RCP seq   OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC other SINGLE ILLUMINA NextSeq 500   ERP116106 NextSeq 500 sequencing ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 08 24     3311799332.0 43576307.0 ena RUN Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:423 6 0:76 A:1182325939;C:888677953;G:922571204;T:318159754;N:64482 76       1182325939 888677953 922571204 318159754 64482 ERX3511269 ERS3555999 ERA2100634 Computational Biology Unit|European Nucleotide Archive Computational Biology Unit 1 0.57505   0.24459   0.99582   0.43365   76   B   usable mapping rate illumina nextseq unknown other unknown bulk unknown unknown   Unknown 2019-07-03 Blastula Embryo Undetermined Embryo Imprecise
9757 9757 ERR3489853 ERX3511268 ERS3555999 ERP116106 PRJEB33323 Deconstructing the individual steps of vertebrate translation initiation ena-STUDY-Computational Biology Unit-03-07-2019-10:11:34:314-422 Other In eukaryotes the number of ribosomes synthesizing a given protein depends on how many are recruited to its mRNA their success in navigating its five prime untranslated region UTR and whether they recognize its start codon. Initiation of translation is a rate limiting step in protein synthesis and key to gene expression control 1 but despite this centrality it remains poorly understood 2 3. Here we introduce ribosome complex profiling RCP seq to capture the transcriptome wide occupancy of scanning initiating elongating and terminating ribosome complexes in a higher eukaryote. We track scanning and elongating ribosomes across all five prime UTRs in zebrafish which enable us to assess the individual regulatory contributions from the three stages of initiation: ribosome recruitment scanning of the five prime UTR and recognition of the start codon. Our data sheds light on small subunit recruitment to mRNAs presenting evidence for the threading model and demonstrates that sequence features regulate this recruitment. We estimate the processivity of scanning ribosomes as they traverse the five prime UTR and show that the repressive effects of upstream open reading frames depend on the efficiency of both translation initiation and termination. Finally we determine the optimal initiation contexts by directly estimating the conversion of scanning to elongating ribosomes and demonstrate specific regulation of translation initiation at the endoplasmic reticulum. Our results open for the possibility of deconvoluting translation initiation into separate stages and provides the first view of global occupancy of ribosomal small subunits in a vertebrate. ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03     Sphere 1 SAMEA5752540 Computational Biology Unit ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|External Id:SAMEA5752540|INSDC center name:Computational Biology Unit|INSDC first public:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|INSDC last update:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:3|common name:zebrafish|dev stage:Sphere|sample name:3|scientific name:Danio rerio                 NextSeq 500 sequencing ena EXPERIMENT Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:423 5 Sphere 1 SSU None RCP seq   OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC other SINGLE ILLUMINA NextSeq 500   ERP116106 NextSeq 500 sequencing ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 08 22     7403181508.0 97410283.0 ena RUN Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:423 5 0:76 A:4338227974;C:1233250165;G:1372229712;T:459322295;N:151362 76       4338227974 1233250165 1372229712 459322295 151362 ERX3511268 ERS3555999 ERA2100634 Computational Biology Unit|European Nucleotide Archive Computational Biology Unit 1 0.765   0.44747   0.99515   0.12467   76   B   usable mapping rate illumina nextseq unknown other unknown bulk unknown unknown   Unknown 2019-07-03 Blastula Embryo Undetermined Embryo Imprecise
9758 9758 ERR3489852 ERX3511267 ERS3555998 ERP116106 PRJEB33323 Deconstructing the individual steps of vertebrate translation initiation ena-STUDY-Computational Biology Unit-03-07-2019-10:11:34:314-422 Other In eukaryotes the number of ribosomes synthesizing a given protein depends on how many are recruited to its mRNA their success in navigating its five prime untranslated region UTR and whether they recognize its start codon. Initiation of translation is a rate limiting step in protein synthesis and key to gene expression control 1 but despite this centrality it remains poorly understood 2 3. Here we introduce ribosome complex profiling RCP seq to capture the transcriptome wide occupancy of scanning initiating elongating and terminating ribosome complexes in a higher eukaryote. We track scanning and elongating ribosomes across all five prime UTRs in zebrafish which enable us to assess the individual regulatory contributions from the three stages of initiation: ribosome recruitment scanning of the five prime UTR and recognition of the start codon. Our data sheds light on small subunit recruitment to mRNAs presenting evidence for the threading model and demonstrates that sequence features regulate this recruitment. We estimate the processivity of scanning ribosomes as they traverse the five prime UTR and show that the repressive effects of upstream open reading frames depend on the efficiency of both translation initiation and termination. Finally we determine the optimal initiation contexts by directly estimating the conversion of scanning to elongating ribosomes and demonstrate specific regulation of translation initiation at the endoplasmic reticulum. Our results open for the possibility of deconvoluting translation initiation into separate stages and provides the first view of global occupancy of ribosomal small subunits in a vertebrate. ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03     64 cell 2 SAMEA5752539 Computational Biology Unit ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|External Id:SAMEA5752539|INSDC center name:Computational Biology Unit|INSDC first public:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|INSDC last update:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:2|common name:zebrafish|dev stage:64 cell|sample name:2|scientific name:Danio rerio                 NextSeq 500 sequencing ena EXPERIMENT Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:423 4 64 cell 2 LSU None RCP seq   OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC other SINGLE ILLUMINA NextSeq 500   ERP116106 NextSeq 500 sequencing ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 08 22     11722578884.0 154244459.0 ena RUN Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:423 4 0:76 A:8175036829;C:1396062240;G:1882846539;T:268587131;N:46145 76       8175036829 1396062240 1882846539 268587131 46145 ERX3511267 ERS3555998 ERA2100634 Computational Biology Unit|European Nucleotide Archive Computational Biology Unit 1 0.81133   0.41331   0.99823   0.03453   76   B   usable mapping rate illumina nextseq unknown other unknown bulk unknown unknown   Unknown 2019-07-03 Cleavage Embryo Undetermined Embryo Imprecise
9759 9759 ERR3489851 ERX3511266 ERS3555998 ERP116106 PRJEB33323 Deconstructing the individual steps of vertebrate translation initiation ena-STUDY-Computational Biology Unit-03-07-2019-10:11:34:314-422 Other In eukaryotes the number of ribosomes synthesizing a given protein depends on how many are recruited to its mRNA their success in navigating its five prime untranslated region UTR and whether they recognize its start codon. Initiation of translation is a rate limiting step in protein synthesis and key to gene expression control 1 but despite this centrality it remains poorly understood 2 3. Here we introduce ribosome complex profiling RCP seq to capture the transcriptome wide occupancy of scanning initiating elongating and terminating ribosome complexes in a higher eukaryote. We track scanning and elongating ribosomes across all five prime UTRs in zebrafish which enable us to assess the individual regulatory contributions from the three stages of initiation: ribosome recruitment scanning of the five prime UTR and recognition of the start codon. Our data sheds light on small subunit recruitment to mRNAs presenting evidence for the threading model and demonstrates that sequence features regulate this recruitment. We estimate the processivity of scanning ribosomes as they traverse the five prime UTR and show that the repressive effects of upstream open reading frames depend on the efficiency of both translation initiation and termination. Finally we determine the optimal initiation contexts by directly estimating the conversion of scanning to elongating ribosomes and demonstrate specific regulation of translation initiation at the endoplasmic reticulum. Our results open for the possibility of deconvoluting translation initiation into separate stages and provides the first view of global occupancy of ribosomal small subunits in a vertebrate. ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03     64 cell 2 SAMEA5752539 Computational Biology Unit ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|External Id:SAMEA5752539|INSDC center name:Computational Biology Unit|INSDC first public:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|INSDC last update:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:2|common name:zebrafish|dev stage:64 cell|sample name:2|scientific name:Danio rerio                 NextSeq 500 sequencing ena EXPERIMENT Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:423 3 64 cell 2 SSU None RCP seq   OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC other SINGLE ILLUMINA NextSeq 500   ERP116106 NextSeq 500 sequencing ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 08 22     9525478088.0 125335238.0 ena RUN Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:423 3 0:76 A:4813606784;C:2048902072;G:2140220088;T:522714000;N:35144 76       4813606784 2048902072 2140220088 522714000 35144 ERX3511266 ERS3555998 ERA2100634 Computational Biology Unit|European Nucleotide Archive Computational Biology Unit 1 0.59747   0.26784   0.996   0.21193   76   B   usable mapping rate illumina nextseq unknown other unknown bulk unknown unknown   Unknown 2019-07-03 Cleavage Embryo Undetermined Embryo Imprecise
9760 9760 ERR3489850 ERX3511265 ERS3555997 ERP116106 PRJEB33323 Deconstructing the individual steps of vertebrate translation initiation ena-STUDY-Computational Biology Unit-03-07-2019-10:11:34:314-422 Other In eukaryotes the number of ribosomes synthesizing a given protein depends on how many are recruited to its mRNA their success in navigating its five prime untranslated region UTR and whether they recognize its start codon. Initiation of translation is a rate limiting step in protein synthesis and key to gene expression control 1 but despite this centrality it remains poorly understood 2 3. Here we introduce ribosome complex profiling RCP seq to capture the transcriptome wide occupancy of scanning initiating elongating and terminating ribosome complexes in a higher eukaryote. We track scanning and elongating ribosomes across all five prime UTRs in zebrafish which enable us to assess the individual regulatory contributions from the three stages of initiation: ribosome recruitment scanning of the five prime UTR and recognition of the start codon. Our data sheds light on small subunit recruitment to mRNAs presenting evidence for the threading model and demonstrates that sequence features regulate this recruitment. We estimate the processivity of scanning ribosomes as they traverse the five prime UTR and show that the repressive effects of upstream open reading frames depend on the efficiency of both translation initiation and termination. Finally we determine the optimal initiation contexts by directly estimating the conversion of scanning to elongating ribosomes and demonstrate specific regulation of translation initiation at the endoplasmic reticulum. Our results open for the possibility of deconvoluting translation initiation into separate stages and provides the first view of global occupancy of ribosomal small subunits in a vertebrate. ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03     64 cell 1 SAMEA5752538 Computational Biology Unit ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|External Id:SAMEA5752538|INSDC center name:Computational Biology Unit|INSDC first public:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|INSDC last update:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:1|common name:zebrafish|dev stage:64 cell|sample name:1|scientific name:Danio rerio                 NextSeq 500 sequencing ena EXPERIMENT Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:423 2 64 cell 1 LSU None RCP seq   OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC other SINGLE ILLUMINA NextSeq 500   ERP116106 NextSeq 500 sequencing ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 08 22     8544157652.0 112423127.0 ena RUN Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:423 2 0:76 A:2633354802;C:2582123846;G:2505786164;T:822713754;N:179086 76       2633354802 2582123846 2505786164 822713754 179086 ERX3511265 ERS3555997 ERA2100634 Computational Biology Unit|European Nucleotide Archive Computational Biology Unit 1 0.34707   0.02129   0.99797   0.62478   76   B   usable mapping rate illumina nextseq unknown other unknown bulk unknown unknown   Unknown 2019-07-03 Cleavage Embryo Undetermined Embryo Imprecise
9761 9761 ERR3489849 ERX3511264 ERS3555997 ERP116106 PRJEB33323 Deconstructing the individual steps of vertebrate translation initiation ena-STUDY-Computational Biology Unit-03-07-2019-10:11:34:314-422 Other In eukaryotes the number of ribosomes synthesizing a given protein depends on how many are recruited to its mRNA their success in navigating its five prime untranslated region UTR and whether they recognize its start codon. Initiation of translation is a rate limiting step in protein synthesis and key to gene expression control 1 but despite this centrality it remains poorly understood 2 3. Here we introduce ribosome complex profiling RCP seq to capture the transcriptome wide occupancy of scanning initiating elongating and terminating ribosome complexes in a higher eukaryote. We track scanning and elongating ribosomes across all five prime UTRs in zebrafish which enable us to assess the individual regulatory contributions from the three stages of initiation: ribosome recruitment scanning of the five prime UTR and recognition of the start codon. Our data sheds light on small subunit recruitment to mRNAs presenting evidence for the threading model and demonstrates that sequence features regulate this recruitment. We estimate the processivity of scanning ribosomes as they traverse the five prime UTR and show that the repressive effects of upstream open reading frames depend on the efficiency of both translation initiation and termination. Finally we determine the optimal initiation contexts by directly estimating the conversion of scanning to elongating ribosomes and demonstrate specific regulation of translation initiation at the endoplasmic reticulum. Our results open for the possibility of deconvoluting translation initiation into separate stages and provides the first view of global occupancy of ribosomal small subunits in a vertebrate. ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03     64 cell 1 SAMEA5752538 Computational Biology Unit ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|External Id:SAMEA5752538|INSDC center name:Computational Biology Unit|INSDC first public:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|INSDC last update:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:1|common name:zebrafish|dev stage:64 cell|sample name:1|scientific name:Danio rerio                 NextSeq 500 sequencing ena EXPERIMENT Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:423 1 64 cell 1 SSU None RCP seq   OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC other SINGLE ILLUMINA NextSeq 500   ERP116106 NextSeq 500 sequencing ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 08 22 run7_64_cell_SSU_12_13_14.fastq.gz fastq 10139466432.0 133414032.0 ena RUN Computational Biology Unit 22 08 2019 11:57:43:423 1 0:76 1:0 A:4628193785;C:2494821868;G:2485640988;T:530605907;N:203884 76 0     4628193785 2494821868 2485640988 530605907 203884 ERX3511264 ERS3555997 ERA2100634 Computational Biology Unit|European Nucleotide Archive Computational Biology Unit 1 0.06893   0.02559   0.99766   0.90567   76   B   usable mapping rate illumina nextseq unknown other unknown bulk unknown unknown   Unknown 2019-07-03 Cleavage Embryo Undetermined Embryo Imprecise
9762 9762 ERR3413870 ERX3437516 ERS3555997 ERP116106 PRJEB33323 Deconstructing the individual steps of vertebrate translation initiation ena-STUDY-Computational Biology Unit-03-07-2019-10:11:34:314-422 Other In eukaryotes the number of ribosomes synthesizing a given protein depends on how many are recruited to its mRNA their success in navigating its five prime untranslated region UTR and whether they recognize its start codon. Initiation of translation is a rate limiting step in protein synthesis and key to gene expression control 1 but despite this centrality it remains poorly understood 2 3. Here we introduce ribosome complex profiling RCP seq to capture the transcriptome wide occupancy of scanning initiating elongating and terminating ribosome complexes in a higher eukaryote. We track scanning and elongating ribosomes across all five prime UTRs in zebrafish which enable us to assess the individual regulatory contributions from the three stages of initiation: ribosome recruitment scanning of the five prime UTR and recognition of the start codon. Our data sheds light on small subunit recruitment to mRNAs presenting evidence for the threading model and demonstrates that sequence features regulate this recruitment. We estimate the processivity of scanning ribosomes as they traverse the five prime UTR and show that the repressive effects of upstream open reading frames depend on the efficiency of both translation initiation and termination. Finally we determine the optimal initiation contexts by directly estimating the conversion of scanning to elongating ribosomes and demonstrate specific regulation of translation initiation at the endoplasmic reticulum. Our results open for the possibility of deconvoluting translation initiation into separate stages and provides the first view of global occupancy of ribosomal small subunits in a vertebrate. ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03     64 cell 1 SAMEA5752538 Computational Biology Unit ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|External Id:SAMEA5752538|INSDC center name:Computational Biology Unit|INSDC first public:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|INSDC last update:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:1|common name:zebrafish|dev stage:64 cell|sample name:1|scientific name:Danio rerio                 NextSeq 500 sequencing ena EXPERIMENT Computational Biology Unit 03 07 2019 14:45:09:705 2 64 cell 1 LSU None RCP seq   OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC other SINGLE ILLUMINA NextSeq 500   ERP116106 NextSeq 500 sequencing ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03     8544157652.0 112423127.0 ena RUN Computational Biology Unit 03 07 2019 14:45:09:705 2 0:76 A:2633354802;C:2582123846;G:2505786164;T:822713754;N:179086 76       2633354802 2582123846 2505786164 822713754 179086 ERX3437516 ERS3555997 ERA2028987 Computational Biology Unit|European Nucleotide Archive Computational Biology Unit 1 0.34696   0.02086   0.99795   0.66261   76   B   usable mapping rate illumina nextseq unknown other unknown bulk unknown unknown   Unknown 2019-07-03 Cleavage Embryo Undetermined Embryo Imprecise
9763 9763 ERR3413869 ERX3437515 ERS3555997 ERP116106 PRJEB33323 Deconstructing the individual steps of vertebrate translation initiation ena-STUDY-Computational Biology Unit-03-07-2019-10:11:34:314-422 Other In eukaryotes the number of ribosomes synthesizing a given protein depends on how many are recruited to its mRNA their success in navigating its five prime untranslated region UTR and whether they recognize its start codon. Initiation of translation is a rate limiting step in protein synthesis and key to gene expression control 1 but despite this centrality it remains poorly understood 2 3. Here we introduce ribosome complex profiling RCP seq to capture the transcriptome wide occupancy of scanning initiating elongating and terminating ribosome complexes in a higher eukaryote. We track scanning and elongating ribosomes across all five prime UTRs in zebrafish which enable us to assess the individual regulatory contributions from the three stages of initiation: ribosome recruitment scanning of the five prime UTR and recognition of the start codon. Our data sheds light on small subunit recruitment to mRNAs presenting evidence for the threading model and demonstrates that sequence features regulate this recruitment. We estimate the processivity of scanning ribosomes as they traverse the five prime UTR and show that the repressive effects of upstream open reading frames depend on the efficiency of both translation initiation and termination. Finally we determine the optimal initiation contexts by directly estimating the conversion of scanning to elongating ribosomes and demonstrate specific regulation of translation initiation at the endoplasmic reticulum. Our results open for the possibility of deconvoluting translation initiation into separate stages and provides the first view of global occupancy of ribosomal small subunits in a vertebrate. ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03     64 cell 1 SAMEA5752538 Computational Biology Unit ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|External Id:SAMEA5752538|INSDC center name:Computational Biology Unit|INSDC first public:2020 03 27T17:04:59Z|INSDC last update:2019 07 03T10:01:14Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:1|common name:zebrafish|dev stage:64 cell|sample name:1|scientific name:Danio rerio                 NextSeq 500 sequencing ena EXPERIMENT Computational Biology Unit 03 07 2019 14:45:09:705 1 64 cell 1 SSU None RCP seq   OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC other SINGLE ILLUMINA NextSeq 500   ERP116106 NextSeq 500 sequencing ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 03 27|ENA LAST UPDATE:2019 07 03     10139466432.0 133414032.0 ena RUN Computational Biology Unit 03 07 2019 14:45:09:705 1 0:76 A:4628193785;C:2494821868;G:2485640988;T:530605907;N:203884 76       4628193785 2494821868 2485640988 530605907 203884 ERX3437515 ERS3555997 ERA2028987 Computational Biology Unit|European Nucleotide Archive Computational Biology Unit 1 0.06884   0.02526   0.99762   0.89856   76   B   usable mapping rate illumina nextseq unknown other unknown bulk unknown unknown   Unknown 2019-07-03 Cleavage Embryo Undetermined Embryo Imprecise
9803 9803 ERR3909553 ERX3918377 ERS4309135 ERP120006 PRJEB36776 CAGE seq of zebrafish cells extracted at the 14 somite stage and segregated by cell cycle dynamics e.g. fast green vs slow red E-MTAB-8795 Transcriptome Analysis The core promoter a stretch of DNA surrounding the transcription start site TSS is a major integration point for regulatory signals controlling gene transcription. Cellular differentiation is marked by divergence in transcriptional repertoire and cell cycling behaviour between cells of different fates. The role promoter associated gene regulatory networks play in development associated transitions in cell cycle dynamics is poorly understood. This study demonstrates in a vertebrate embryo how core promoter variations define transcriptional output in cells transitioning from a proliferative to cell lineage specifying phenotype. Assessment of cell proliferation across zebrafish embryo development using the FUCCI transgenic cell cycle phase marker revealed a spatial and lineage specific separation in cell cycling behaviour. To investigate the role differential promoter usage plays in this process cap analysis of gene expression CAGE was performed on cells segregated by cycling dynamics. ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 06 19|ENA LAST UPDATE:2020 02 13   Protocols: Zebrafish were dechorionated and selected at the 14 somite stage 14 hpf The embryos were dissociated into a single cell suspension using enzyme free cell dissociation buffer PBS based Gibco. Dissociated cells were pelleted and resuspended in Hanks balanced salt solution without xxx chloride or magnesium sulphate Sigma for sorting. Cells were fluorescence associated cell sorted FACS into populations displaying red and green fluorescence. RNA was extracted from isolated cells using the miRNeasy kit Qiagen. RNA quality was analysed by capillary electrophoresis Bioanalyzer 2100 Agilent. All samples had an RNA integrity number RIN >9. NanoCAGE libraries were generated following a protocol described in: Poulain S. Kato S. Arnaud O. Morlighem J.E. Suzuki M. Plessy C. and Harbers M. 2017 NanoCAGE: A Method for the Analysis of Coding and Noncoding five prime Capped Transcriptomes. Methods Mol Biol 1543 57 109. Total3 SAMEA6544760 UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 06 19T17:05:18Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2020 02 13T15:36:56Z|External Id:SAMEA6544760|INSDC center name:UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM|INSDC first public:2020 06 19T17:05:18Z|INSDC last update:2020 02 13T15:36:56Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:E MTAB 8795:Total3|age:14|broker name:ArrayExpress|common name:zebrafish|developmental stage:embryo|fraction:unsorted whole organism|organism part:whole organism|sample name:E MTAB 8795:Total3|scientific name:Danio rerio|sex:not available|strain:Dual FUCCI                 Illumina HiSeq 2500 sequencing; CAGE seq of zebrafish cells extracted at the 14 somite stage and segregated by cell cycle dynamics e.g. fast green vs slow red E MTAB 8795:Total3 s Total3 s CAGE seq of zebrafish cells extracted at the 14 somite stage and segregated by cell cycle dynamics e.g. fast green vs slow red Zebrafish were dechorionated and selected at the 14 somite stage 14 hpf The embryos were dissociated into a single cell suspension using enzyme free cell dissociation buffer PBS based Gibco. Dissociated cells were pelleted and resuspended in Hanks balanced salt solution without xxx chloride or magnesium sulphate Sigma for sorting. Cells were fluorescence associated cell sorted FACS into populations displaying red and green fluorescence. RNA was extracted from isolated cells using the miRNeasy kit Qiagen. RNA quality was analysed by capillary electrophoresis Bioanalyzer 2100 Agilent. All samples had an RNA integrity number RIN >9. NanoCAGE libraries were generated following a protocol described in: Poulain S. Kato S. Arnaud O. Morlighem J.E. Suzuki M. Plessy C. and Harbers M. 2017 NanoCAGE: A Method for the Analysis of Coding and Noncoding five prime Capped Transcriptomes. Methods Mol Biol 1543 57 109. Experimental Factor: fraction:unsorted whole organism OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC CAGE SINGLE ILLUMINA Illumina HiSeq 2500   ERP120006 Illumina HiSeq 2500 sequencing; CAGE seq of zebrafish cells extracted at the 14 somite stage and segregated by cell cycle dynamics e.g. fast green vs slow red ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 06 19|ENA LAST UPDATE:2020 02 25 14SomiteTotal3_TCGACG_L003_R1_001.fastq.gz fastq 652379310.0 14497318.0 E MTAB 8795:Total3 0:45 1:0 A:150840591;C:135992123;G:240098326;T:125390188;N:58082 45 0     150840591 135992123 240098326 125390188 58082 ERX3918377 ERS4309135 ERA2381432 UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM|European Nucleotide Archive UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM|European Nucleotide Archive 1 0.00539   0.00111   0.99582   0.74079   45   T   under 1.2% mapping rate illumina hiseq_era unknown cage unknown bulk unknown unknown   United Kingdom 2020-02-13 Segmentation Embryo Whole Organism All anatomical structures
9804 9804 ERR3909552 ERX3918376 ERS4309134 ERP120006 PRJEB36776 CAGE seq of zebrafish cells extracted at the 14 somite stage and segregated by cell cycle dynamics e.g. fast green vs slow red E-MTAB-8795 Transcriptome Analysis The core promoter a stretch of DNA surrounding the transcription start site TSS is a major integration point for regulatory signals controlling gene transcription. Cellular differentiation is marked by divergence in transcriptional repertoire and cell cycling behaviour between cells of different fates. The role promoter associated gene regulatory networks play in development associated transitions in cell cycle dynamics is poorly understood. This study demonstrates in a vertebrate embryo how core promoter variations define transcriptional output in cells transitioning from a proliferative to cell lineage specifying phenotype. Assessment of cell proliferation across zebrafish embryo development using the FUCCI transgenic cell cycle phase marker revealed a spatial and lineage specific separation in cell cycling behaviour. To investigate the role differential promoter usage plays in this process cap analysis of gene expression CAGE was performed on cells segregated by cycling dynamics. ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 06 19|ENA LAST UPDATE:2020 02 13   Protocols: Zebrafish were dechorionated and selected at the 14 somite stage 14 hpf The embryos were dissociated into a single cell suspension using enzyme free cell dissociation buffer PBS based Gibco. Dissociated cells were pelleted and resuspended in Hanks balanced salt solution without xxx chloride or magnesium sulphate Sigma for sorting. Cells were fluorescence associated cell sorted FACS into populations displaying red and green fluorescence. RNA was extracted from isolated cells using the miRNeasy kit Qiagen. RNA quality was analysed by capillary electrophoresis Bioanalyzer 2100 Agilent. All samples had an RNA integrity number RIN >9. NanoCAGE libraries were generated following a protocol described in: Poulain S. Kato S. Arnaud O. Morlighem J.E. Suzuki M. Plessy C. and Harbers M. 2017 NanoCAGE: A Method for the Analysis of Coding and Noncoding five prime Capped Transcriptomes. Methods Mol Biol 1543 57 109. Total2 SAMEA6544759 UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 06 19T17:05:18Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2020 02 13T15:36:56Z|External Id:SAMEA6544759|INSDC center name:UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM|INSDC first public:2020 06 19T17:05:18Z|INSDC last update:2020 02 13T15:36:56Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:E MTAB 8795:Total2|age:14|broker name:ArrayExpress|common name:zebrafish|developmental stage:embryo|fraction:unsorted whole organism|organism part:whole organism|sample name:E MTAB 8795:Total2|scientific name:Danio rerio|sex:not available|strain:Dual FUCCI                 Illumina HiSeq 2500 sequencing; CAGE seq of zebrafish cells extracted at the 14 somite stage and segregated by cell cycle dynamics e.g. fast green vs slow red E MTAB 8795:Total2 s Total2 s CAGE seq of zebrafish cells extracted at the 14 somite stage and segregated by cell cycle dynamics e.g. fast green vs slow red Zebrafish were dechorionated and selected at the 14 somite stage 14 hpf The embryos were dissociated into a single cell suspension using enzyme free cell dissociation buffer PBS based Gibco. Dissociated cells were pelleted and resuspended in Hanks balanced salt solution without xxx chloride or magnesium sulphate Sigma for sorting. Cells were fluorescence associated cell sorted FACS into populations displaying red and green fluorescence. RNA was extracted from isolated cells using the miRNeasy kit Qiagen. RNA quality was analysed by capillary electrophoresis Bioanalyzer 2100 Agilent. All samples had an RNA integrity number RIN >9. NanoCAGE libraries were generated following a protocol described in: Poulain S. Kato S. Arnaud O. Morlighem J.E. Suzuki M. Plessy C. and Harbers M. 2017 NanoCAGE: A Method for the Analysis of Coding and Noncoding five prime Capped Transcriptomes. Methods Mol Biol 1543 57 109. Experimental Factor: fraction:unsorted whole organism OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC CAGE SINGLE ILLUMINA Illumina HiSeq 2500   ERP120006 Illumina HiSeq 2500 sequencing; CAGE seq of zebrafish cells extracted at the 14 somite stage and segregated by cell cycle dynamics e.g. fast green vs slow red ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 06 19|ENA LAST UPDATE:2020 02 25 14SomiteTotal2_TATAGC_L003_R1_001.fastq.gz fastq 457981740.0 10177372.0 E MTAB 8795:Total2 0:45 1:0 A:108846441;C:95327665;G:163111561;T:90654528;N:41545 45 0     108846441 95327665 163111561 90654528 41545 ERX3918376 ERS4309134 ERA2381432 UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM|European Nucleotide Archive UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM|European Nucleotide Archive 1 0.00612   0.00144   0.99387   0.66666   45   T   under 1.2% mapping rate illumina hiseq_era unknown cage unknown bulk unknown unknown   United Kingdom 2020-02-13 Segmentation Embryo Whole Organism All anatomical structures
9805 9805 ERR3909551 ERX3918375 ERS4309133 ERP120006 PRJEB36776 CAGE seq of zebrafish cells extracted at the 14 somite stage and segregated by cell cycle dynamics e.g. fast green vs slow red E-MTAB-8795 Transcriptome Analysis The core promoter a stretch of DNA surrounding the transcription start site TSS is a major integration point for regulatory signals controlling gene transcription. Cellular differentiation is marked by divergence in transcriptional repertoire and cell cycling behaviour between cells of different fates. The role promoter associated gene regulatory networks play in development associated transitions in cell cycle dynamics is poorly understood. This study demonstrates in a vertebrate embryo how core promoter variations define transcriptional output in cells transitioning from a proliferative to cell lineage specifying phenotype. Assessment of cell proliferation across zebrafish embryo development using the FUCCI transgenic cell cycle phase marker revealed a spatial and lineage specific separation in cell cycling behaviour. To investigate the role differential promoter usage plays in this process cap analysis of gene expression CAGE was performed on cells segregated by cycling dynamics. ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 06 19|ENA LAST UPDATE:2020 02 13   Protocols: Zebrafish were dechorionated and selected at the 14 somite stage 14 hpf The embryos were dissociated into a single cell suspension using enzyme free cell dissociation buffer PBS based Gibco. Dissociated cells were pelleted and resuspended in Hanks balanced salt solution without xxx chloride or magnesium sulphate Sigma for sorting. Cells were fluorescence associated cell sorted FACS into populations displaying red and green fluorescence. RNA was extracted from isolated cells using the miRNeasy kit Qiagen. RNA quality was analysed by capillary electrophoresis Bioanalyzer 2100 Agilent. All samples had an RNA integrity number RIN >9. NanoCAGE libraries were generated following a protocol described in: Poulain S. Kato S. Arnaud O. Morlighem J.E. Suzuki M. Plessy C. and Harbers M. 2017 NanoCAGE: A Method for the Analysis of Coding and Noncoding five prime Capped Transcriptomes. Methods Mol Biol 1543 57 109. Total1 SAMEA6544758 UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 06 19T17:05:18Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2020 02 13T15:36:56Z|External Id:SAMEA6544758|INSDC center name:UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM|INSDC first public:2020 06 19T17:05:18Z|INSDC last update:2020 02 13T15:36:56Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:E MTAB 8795:Total1|age:14|broker name:ArrayExpress|common name:zebrafish|developmental stage:embryo|fraction:unsorted whole organism|organism part:whole organism|sample name:E MTAB 8795:Total1|scientific name:Danio rerio|sex:not available|strain:Dual FUCCI                 Illumina HiSeq 2500 sequencing; CAGE seq of zebrafish cells extracted at the 14 somite stage and segregated by cell cycle dynamics e.g. fast green vs slow red E MTAB 8795:Total1 s Total1 s CAGE seq of zebrafish cells extracted at the 14 somite stage and segregated by cell cycle dynamics e.g. fast green vs slow red Zebrafish were dechorionated and selected at the 14 somite stage 14 hpf The embryos were dissociated into a single cell suspension using enzyme free cell dissociation buffer PBS based Gibco. Dissociated cells were pelleted and resuspended in Hanks balanced salt solution without xxx chloride or magnesium sulphate Sigma for sorting. Cells were fluorescence associated cell sorted FACS into populations displaying red and green fluorescence. RNA was extracted from isolated cells using the miRNeasy kit Qiagen. RNA quality was analysed by capillary electrophoresis Bioanalyzer 2100 Agilent. All samples had an RNA integrity number RIN >9. NanoCAGE libraries were generated following a protocol described in: Poulain S. Kato S. Arnaud O. Morlighem J.E. Suzuki M. Plessy C. and Harbers M. 2017 NanoCAGE: A Method for the Analysis of Coding and Noncoding five prime Capped Transcriptomes. Methods Mol Biol 1543 57 109. Experimental Factor: fraction:unsorted whole organism OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC CAGE SINGLE ILLUMINA Illumina HiSeq 2500   ERP120006 Illumina HiSeq 2500 sequencing; CAGE seq of zebrafish cells extracted at the 14 somite stage and segregated by cell cycle dynamics e.g. fast green vs slow red ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 06 19|ENA LAST UPDATE:2020 02 25 14SomiteTotal1_GTATAC_L003_R1_001.fastq.gz fastq 778934655.0 17309659.0 E MTAB 8795:Total1 0:45 1:0 A:175694794;C:165046556;G:285795545;T:152324198;N:73562 45 0     175694794 165046556 285795545 152324198 73562 ERX3918375 ERS4309133 ERA2381432 UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM|European Nucleotide Archive UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM|European Nucleotide Archive 1 0.0048   0.00098   0.99492   0.69892   45   T   under 1.2% mapping rate illumina hiseq_era unknown cage unknown bulk unknown unknown   United Kingdom 2020-02-13 Segmentation Embryo Whole Organism All anatomical structures
9806 9806 ERR3909550 ERX3918374 ERS4309132 ERP120006 PRJEB36776 CAGE seq of zebrafish cells extracted at the 14 somite stage and segregated by cell cycle dynamics e.g. fast green vs slow red E-MTAB-8795 Transcriptome Analysis The core promoter a stretch of DNA surrounding the transcription start site TSS is a major integration point for regulatory signals controlling gene transcription. Cellular differentiation is marked by divergence in transcriptional repertoire and cell cycling behaviour between cells of different fates. The role promoter associated gene regulatory networks play in development associated transitions in cell cycle dynamics is poorly understood. This study demonstrates in a vertebrate embryo how core promoter variations define transcriptional output in cells transitioning from a proliferative to cell lineage specifying phenotype. Assessment of cell proliferation across zebrafish embryo development using the FUCCI transgenic cell cycle phase marker revealed a spatial and lineage specific separation in cell cycling behaviour. To investigate the role differential promoter usage plays in this process cap analysis of gene expression CAGE was performed on cells segregated by cycling dynamics. ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 06 19|ENA LAST UPDATE:2020 02 13   Protocols: Zebrafish were dechorionated and selected at the 14 somite stage 14 hpf The embryos were dissociated into a single cell suspension using enzyme free cell dissociation buffer PBS based Gibco. Dissociated cells were pelleted and resuspended in Hanks balanced salt solution without xxx chloride or magnesium sulphate Sigma for sorting. Cells were fluorescence associated cell sorted FACS into populations displaying red and green fluorescence. RNA was extracted from isolated cells using the miRNeasy kit Qiagen. RNA quality was analysed by capillary electrophoresis Bioanalyzer 2100 Agilent. All samples had an RNA integrity number RIN >9. NanoCAGE libraries were generated following a protocol described in: Poulain S. Kato S. Arnaud O. Morlighem J.E. Suzuki M. Plessy C. and Harbers M. 2017 NanoCAGE: A Method for the Analysis of Coding and Noncoding five prime Capped Transcriptomes. Methods Mol Biol 1543 57 109. Red3 SAMEA6544757 UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 06 19T17:05:18Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2020 02 13T15:36:56Z|External Id:SAMEA6544757|INSDC center name:UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM|INSDC first public:2020 06 19T17:05:18Z|INSDC last update:2020 02 13T15:36:56Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:E MTAB 8795:Red3|age:14|broker name:ArrayExpress|common name:zebrafish|developmental stage:embryo|fraction:G1 slow cycling|organism part:whole organism|sample name:E MTAB 8795:Red3|scientific name:Danio rerio|sex:not available|strain:Dual FUCCI                 Illumina HiSeq 2500 sequencing; CAGE seq of zebrafish cells extracted at the 14 somite stage and segregated by cell cycle dynamics e.g. fast green vs slow red E MTAB 8795:Red3 s Red3 s CAGE seq of zebrafish cells extracted at the 14 somite stage and segregated by cell cycle dynamics e.g. fast green vs slow red Zebrafish were dechorionated and selected at the 14 somite stage 14 hpf The embryos were dissociated into a single cell suspension using enzyme free cell dissociation buffer PBS based Gibco. Dissociated cells were pelleted and resuspended in Hanks balanced salt solution without xxx chloride or magnesium sulphate Sigma for sorting. Cells were fluorescence associated cell sorted FACS into populations displaying red and green fluorescence. RNA was extracted from isolated cells using the miRNeasy kit Qiagen. RNA quality was analysed by capillary electrophoresis Bioanalyzer 2100 Agilent. All samples had an RNA integrity number RIN >9. NanoCAGE libraries were generated following a protocol described in: Poulain S. Kato S. Arnaud O. Morlighem J.E. Suzuki M. Plessy C. and Harbers M. 2017 NanoCAGE: A Method for the Analysis of Coding and Noncoding five prime Capped Transcriptomes. Methods Mol Biol 1543 57 109. Experimental Factor: fraction:G1 slow cycling OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC CAGE SINGLE ILLUMINA Illumina HiSeq 2500   ERP120006 Illumina HiSeq 2500 sequencing; CAGE seq of zebrafish cells extracted at the 14 somite stage and segregated by cell cycle dynamics e.g. fast green vs slow red ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 06 19|ENA LAST UPDATE:2020 02 25 14SomiteRed3_CACGAT_L003_R1_001.fastq.gz fastq 980271990.0 21783822.0 E MTAB 8795:Red3 0:45 1:0 A:231772782;C:201265416;G:341867307;T:205267905;N:98580 45 0     231772782 201265416 341867307 205267905 98580 ERX3918374 ERS4309132 ERA2381432 UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM|European Nucleotide Archive UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM|European Nucleotide Archive 1 0.0047   0.00138   0.99366   0.64343   45   T   under 1.2% mapping rate illumina hiseq_era unknown cage unknown bulk unknown unknown   United Kingdom 2020-02-13 Segmentation Embryo Whole Organism All anatomical structures
9807 9807 ERR3909549 ERX3918373 ERS4309131 ERP120006 PRJEB36776 CAGE seq of zebrafish cells extracted at the 14 somite stage and segregated by cell cycle dynamics e.g. fast green vs slow red E-MTAB-8795 Transcriptome Analysis The core promoter a stretch of DNA surrounding the transcription start site TSS is a major integration point for regulatory signals controlling gene transcription. Cellular differentiation is marked by divergence in transcriptional repertoire and cell cycling behaviour between cells of different fates. The role promoter associated gene regulatory networks play in development associated transitions in cell cycle dynamics is poorly understood. This study demonstrates in a vertebrate embryo how core promoter variations define transcriptional output in cells transitioning from a proliferative to cell lineage specifying phenotype. Assessment of cell proliferation across zebrafish embryo development using the FUCCI transgenic cell cycle phase marker revealed a spatial and lineage specific separation in cell cycling behaviour. To investigate the role differential promoter usage plays in this process cap analysis of gene expression CAGE was performed on cells segregated by cycling dynamics. ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 06 19|ENA LAST UPDATE:2020 02 13   Protocols: Zebrafish were dechorionated and selected at the 14 somite stage 14 hpf The embryos were dissociated into a single cell suspension using enzyme free cell dissociation buffer PBS based Gibco. Dissociated cells were pelleted and resuspended in Hanks balanced salt solution without xxx chloride or magnesium sulphate Sigma for sorting. Cells were fluorescence associated cell sorted FACS into populations displaying red and green fluorescence. RNA was extracted from isolated cells using the miRNeasy kit Qiagen. RNA quality was analysed by capillary electrophoresis Bioanalyzer 2100 Agilent. All samples had an RNA integrity number RIN >9. NanoCAGE libraries were generated following a protocol described in: Poulain S. Kato S. Arnaud O. Morlighem J.E. Suzuki M. Plessy C. and Harbers M. 2017 NanoCAGE: A Method for the Analysis of Coding and Noncoding five prime Capped Transcriptomes. Methods Mol Biol 1543 57 109. Red2 SAMEA6544756 UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 06 19T17:05:18Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2020 02 13T15:36:56Z|External Id:SAMEA6544756|INSDC center name:UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM|INSDC first public:2020 06 19T17:05:18Z|INSDC last update:2020 02 13T15:36:56Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:E MTAB 8795:Red2|age:14|broker name:ArrayExpress|common name:zebrafish|developmental stage:embryo|fraction:G1 slow cycling|organism part:whole organism|sample name:E MTAB 8795:Red2|scientific name:Danio rerio|sex:not available|strain:Dual FUCCI                 Illumina HiSeq 2500 sequencing; CAGE seq of zebrafish cells extracted at the 14 somite stage and segregated by cell cycle dynamics e.g. fast green vs slow red E MTAB 8795:Red2 s Red2 s CAGE seq of zebrafish cells extracted at the 14 somite stage and segregated by cell cycle dynamics e.g. fast green vs slow red Zebrafish were dechorionated and selected at the 14 somite stage 14 hpf The embryos were dissociated into a single cell suspension using enzyme free cell dissociation buffer PBS based Gibco. Dissociated cells were pelleted and resuspended in Hanks balanced salt solution without xxx chloride or magnesium sulphate Sigma for sorting. Cells were fluorescence associated cell sorted FACS into populations displaying red and green fluorescence. RNA was extracted from isolated cells using the miRNeasy kit Qiagen. RNA quality was analysed by capillary electrophoresis Bioanalyzer 2100 Agilent. All samples had an RNA integrity number RIN >9. NanoCAGE libraries were generated following a protocol described in: Poulain S. Kato S. Arnaud O. Morlighem J.E. Suzuki M. Plessy C. and Harbers M. 2017 NanoCAGE: A Method for the Analysis of Coding and Noncoding five prime Capped Transcriptomes. Methods Mol Biol 1543 57 109. Experimental Factor: fraction:G1 slow cycling OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC CAGE SINGLE ILLUMINA Illumina HiSeq 2500   ERP120006 Illumina HiSeq 2500 sequencing; CAGE seq of zebrafish cells extracted at the 14 somite stage and segregated by cell cycle dynamics e.g. fast green vs slow red ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 06 19|ENA LAST UPDATE:2020 02 25 14SomiteRed2_ATCGTG_L003_R1_001.fastq.gz fastq 755095185.0 16779893.0 E MTAB 8795:Red2 0:45 1:0 A:173488674;C:161696782;G:267896203;T:151943387;N:70139 45 0     173488674 161696782 267896203 151943387 70139 ERX3918373 ERS4309131 ERA2381432 UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM|European Nucleotide Archive UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM|European Nucleotide Archive 1 0.00548   0.00113   0.99415   0.65826   45   T   under 1.2% mapping rate illumina hiseq_era unknown cage unknown bulk unknown unknown   United Kingdom 2020-02-13 Segmentation Embryo Whole Organism All anatomical structures
9808 9808 ERR3909548 ERX3918372 ERS4309130 ERP120006 PRJEB36776 CAGE seq of zebrafish cells extracted at the 14 somite stage and segregated by cell cycle dynamics e.g. fast green vs slow red E-MTAB-8795 Transcriptome Analysis The core promoter a stretch of DNA surrounding the transcription start site TSS is a major integration point for regulatory signals controlling gene transcription. Cellular differentiation is marked by divergence in transcriptional repertoire and cell cycling behaviour between cells of different fates. The role promoter associated gene regulatory networks play in development associated transitions in cell cycle dynamics is poorly understood. This study demonstrates in a vertebrate embryo how core promoter variations define transcriptional output in cells transitioning from a proliferative to cell lineage specifying phenotype. Assessment of cell proliferation across zebrafish embryo development using the FUCCI transgenic cell cycle phase marker revealed a spatial and lineage specific separation in cell cycling behaviour. To investigate the role differential promoter usage plays in this process cap analysis of gene expression CAGE was performed on cells segregated by cycling dynamics. ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 06 19|ENA LAST UPDATE:2020 02 13   Protocols: Zebrafish were dechorionated and selected at the 14 somite stage 14 hpf The embryos were dissociated into a single cell suspension using enzyme free cell dissociation buffer PBS based Gibco. Dissociated cells were pelleted and resuspended in Hanks balanced salt solution without xxx chloride or magnesium sulphate Sigma for sorting. Cells were fluorescence associated cell sorted FACS into populations displaying red and green fluorescence. RNA was extracted from isolated cells using the miRNeasy kit Qiagen. RNA quality was analysed by capillary electrophoresis Bioanalyzer 2100 Agilent. All samples had an RNA integrity number RIN >9. NanoCAGE libraries were generated following a protocol described in: Poulain S. Kato S. Arnaud O. Morlighem J.E. Suzuki M. Plessy C. and Harbers M. 2017 NanoCAGE: A Method for the Analysis of Coding and Noncoding five prime Capped Transcriptomes. Methods Mol Biol 1543 57 109. Red1 SAMEA6544755 UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 06 19T17:05:18Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2020 02 13T15:36:56Z|External Id:SAMEA6544755|INSDC center name:UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM|INSDC first public:2020 06 19T17:05:18Z|INSDC last update:2020 02 13T15:36:56Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:E MTAB 8795:Red1|age:14|broker name:ArrayExpress|common name:zebrafish|developmental stage:embryo|fraction:G1 slow cycling|organism part:whole organism|sample name:E MTAB 8795:Red1|scientific name:Danio rerio|sex:not available|strain:Dual FUCCI                 Illumina HiSeq 2500 sequencing; CAGE seq of zebrafish cells extracted at the 14 somite stage and segregated by cell cycle dynamics e.g. fast green vs slow red E MTAB 8795:Red1 s Red1 s CAGE seq of zebrafish cells extracted at the 14 somite stage and segregated by cell cycle dynamics e.g. fast green vs slow red Zebrafish were dechorionated and selected at the 14 somite stage 14 hpf The embryos were dissociated into a single cell suspension using enzyme free cell dissociation buffer PBS based Gibco. Dissociated cells were pelleted and resuspended in Hanks balanced salt solution without xxx chloride or magnesium sulphate Sigma for sorting. Cells were fluorescence associated cell sorted FACS into populations displaying red and green fluorescence. RNA was extracted from isolated cells using the miRNeasy kit Qiagen. RNA quality was analysed by capillary electrophoresis Bioanalyzer 2100 Agilent. All samples had an RNA integrity number RIN >9. NanoCAGE libraries were generated following a protocol described in: Poulain S. Kato S. Arnaud O. Morlighem J.E. Suzuki M. Plessy C. and Harbers M. 2017 NanoCAGE: A Method for the Analysis of Coding and Noncoding five prime Capped Transcriptomes. Methods Mol Biol 1543 57 109. Experimental Factor: fraction:G1 slow cycling OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC CAGE SINGLE ILLUMINA Illumina HiSeq 2500   ERP120006 Illumina HiSeq 2500 sequencing; CAGE seq of zebrafish cells extracted at the 14 somite stage and segregated by cell cycle dynamics e.g. fast green vs slow red ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 06 19|ENA LAST UPDATE:2020 02 25 14SomiteRed1_ACAGAT_L003_R1_001.fastq.gz fastq 755180370.0 16781786.0 E MTAB 8795:Red1 0:45 1:0 A:179369537;C:157573419;G:260889303;T:157277751;N:70360 45 0     179369537 157573419 260889303 157277751 70360 ERX3918372 ERS4309130 ERA2381432 UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM|European Nucleotide Archive UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM|European Nucleotide Archive 1 0.00451   0.00099   0.99314   0.66248   45   T   under 1.2% mapping rate illumina hiseq_era unknown cage unknown bulk unknown unknown   United Kingdom 2020-02-13 Segmentation Embryo Whole Organism All anatomical structures
9809 9809 ERR3909547 ERX3918371 ERS4309129 ERP120006 PRJEB36776 CAGE seq of zebrafish cells extracted at the 14 somite stage and segregated by cell cycle dynamics e.g. fast green vs slow red E-MTAB-8795 Transcriptome Analysis The core promoter a stretch of DNA surrounding the transcription start site TSS is a major integration point for regulatory signals controlling gene transcription. Cellular differentiation is marked by divergence in transcriptional repertoire and cell cycling behaviour between cells of different fates. The role promoter associated gene regulatory networks play in development associated transitions in cell cycle dynamics is poorly understood. This study demonstrates in a vertebrate embryo how core promoter variations define transcriptional output in cells transitioning from a proliferative to cell lineage specifying phenotype. Assessment of cell proliferation across zebrafish embryo development using the FUCCI transgenic cell cycle phase marker revealed a spatial and lineage specific separation in cell cycling behaviour. To investigate the role differential promoter usage plays in this process cap analysis of gene expression CAGE was performed on cells segregated by cycling dynamics. ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 06 19|ENA LAST UPDATE:2020 02 13   Protocols: Zebrafish were dechorionated and selected at the 14 somite stage 14 hpf The embryos were dissociated into a single cell suspension using enzyme free cell dissociation buffer PBS based Gibco. Dissociated cells were pelleted and resuspended in Hanks balanced salt solution without xxx chloride or magnesium sulphate Sigma for sorting. Cells were fluorescence associated cell sorted FACS into populations displaying red and green fluorescence. RNA was extracted from isolated cells using the miRNeasy kit Qiagen. RNA quality was analysed by capillary electrophoresis Bioanalyzer 2100 Agilent. All samples had an RNA integrity number RIN >9. NanoCAGE libraries were generated following a protocol described in: Poulain S. Kato S. Arnaud O. Morlighem J.E. Suzuki M. Plessy C. and Harbers M. 2017 NanoCAGE: A Method for the Analysis of Coding and Noncoding five prime Capped Transcriptomes. Methods Mol Biol 1543 57 109. Green3 SAMEA6544754 UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 06 19T17:05:18Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2020 02 13T15:36:56Z|External Id:SAMEA6544754|INSDC center name:UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM|INSDC first public:2020 06 19T17:05:18Z|INSDC last update:2020 02 13T15:36:56Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:E MTAB 8795:Green3|age:14|broker name:ArrayExpress|common name:zebrafish|developmental stage:embryo|fraction:S/G2/M rapid cycling|organism part:whole organism|sample name:E MTAB 8795:Green3|scientific name:Danio rerio|sex:not available|strain:Dual FUCCI                 Illumina HiSeq 2500 sequencing; CAGE seq of zebrafish cells extracted at the 14 somite stage and segregated by cell cycle dynamics e.g. fast green vs slow red E MTAB 8795:Green3 s Green3 s CAGE seq of zebrafish cells extracted at the 14 somite stage and segregated by cell cycle dynamics e.g. fast green vs slow red Zebrafish were dechorionated and selected at the 14 somite stage 14 hpf The embryos were dissociated into a single cell suspension using enzyme free cell dissociation buffer PBS based Gibco. Dissociated cells were pelleted and resuspended in Hanks balanced salt solution without xxx chloride or magnesium sulphate Sigma for sorting. Cells were fluorescence associated cell sorted FACS into populations displaying red and green fluorescence. RNA was extracted from isolated cells using the miRNeasy kit Qiagen. RNA quality was analysed by capillary electrophoresis Bioanalyzer 2100 Agilent. All samples had an RNA integrity number RIN >9. NanoCAGE libraries were generated following a protocol described in: Poulain S. Kato S. Arnaud O. Morlighem J.E. Suzuki M. Plessy C. and Harbers M. 2017 NanoCAGE: A Method for the Analysis of Coding and Noncoding five prime Capped Transcriptomes. Methods Mol Biol 1543 57 109. Experimental Factor: fraction:S/G2/M rapid cycling OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC CAGE SINGLE ILLUMINA Illumina HiSeq 2500   ERP120006 Illumina HiSeq 2500 sequencing; CAGE seq of zebrafish cells extracted at the 14 somite stage and segregated by cell cycle dynamics e.g. fast green vs slow red ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 06 19|ENA LAST UPDATE:2020 02 25 14SomiteGreen3_GAGTGA_L003_R1_001.fastq.gz fastq 819288855.0 18206419.0 E MTAB 8795:Green3 0:45 1:0 A:189173618;C:170597494;G:286250625;T:173188944;N:78174 45 0     189173618 170597494 286250625 173188944 78174 ERX3918371 ERS4309129 ERA2381432 UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM|European Nucleotide Archive UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM|European Nucleotide Archive 1 0.00439   0.001   0.99377   0.68367   45   T   under 1.2% mapping rate illumina hiseq_era unknown cage unknown bulk unknown unknown   United Kingdom 2020-02-13 Segmentation Embryo Whole Organism All anatomical structures
9810 9810 ERR3909546 ERX3918370 ERS4309128 ERP120006 PRJEB36776 CAGE seq of zebrafish cells extracted at the 14 somite stage and segregated by cell cycle dynamics e.g. fast green vs slow red E-MTAB-8795 Transcriptome Analysis The core promoter a stretch of DNA surrounding the transcription start site TSS is a major integration point for regulatory signals controlling gene transcription. Cellular differentiation is marked by divergence in transcriptional repertoire and cell cycling behaviour between cells of different fates. The role promoter associated gene regulatory networks play in development associated transitions in cell cycle dynamics is poorly understood. This study demonstrates in a vertebrate embryo how core promoter variations define transcriptional output in cells transitioning from a proliferative to cell lineage specifying phenotype. Assessment of cell proliferation across zebrafish embryo development using the FUCCI transgenic cell cycle phase marker revealed a spatial and lineage specific separation in cell cycling behaviour. To investigate the role differential promoter usage plays in this process cap analysis of gene expression CAGE was performed on cells segregated by cycling dynamics. ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 06 19|ENA LAST UPDATE:2020 02 13   Protocols: Zebrafish were dechorionated and selected at the 14 somite stage 14 hpf The embryos were dissociated into a single cell suspension using enzyme free cell dissociation buffer PBS based Gibco. Dissociated cells were pelleted and resuspended in Hanks balanced salt solution without xxx chloride or magnesium sulphate Sigma for sorting. Cells were fluorescence associated cell sorted FACS into populations displaying red and green fluorescence. RNA was extracted from isolated cells using the miRNeasy kit Qiagen. RNA quality was analysed by capillary electrophoresis Bioanalyzer 2100 Agilent. All samples had an RNA integrity number RIN >9. NanoCAGE libraries were generated following a protocol described in: Poulain S. Kato S. Arnaud O. Morlighem J.E. Suzuki M. Plessy C. and Harbers M. 2017 NanoCAGE: A Method for the Analysis of Coding and Noncoding five prime Capped Transcriptomes. Methods Mol Biol 1543 57 109. Green2 SAMEA6544753 UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 06 19T17:05:18Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2020 02 13T15:36:56Z|External Id:SAMEA6544753|INSDC center name:UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM|INSDC first public:2020 06 19T17:05:18Z|INSDC last update:2020 02 13T15:36:56Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:E MTAB 8795:Green2|age:14|broker name:ArrayExpress|common name:zebrafish|developmental stage:embryo|fraction:S/G2/M rapid cycling|organism part:whole organism|sample name:E MTAB 8795:Green2|scientific name:Danio rerio|sex:not available|strain:Dual FUCCI                 Illumina HiSeq 2500 sequencing; CAGE seq of zebrafish cells extracted at the 14 somite stage and segregated by cell cycle dynamics e.g. fast green vs slow red E MTAB 8795:Green2 s Green2 s CAGE seq of zebrafish cells extracted at the 14 somite stage and segregated by cell cycle dynamics e.g. fast green vs slow red Zebrafish were dechorionated and selected at the 14 somite stage 14 hpf The embryos were dissociated into a single cell suspension using enzyme free cell dissociation buffer PBS based Gibco. Dissociated cells were pelleted and resuspended in Hanks balanced salt solution without xxx chloride or magnesium sulphate Sigma for sorting. Cells were fluorescence associated cell sorted FACS into populations displaying red and green fluorescence. RNA was extracted from isolated cells using the miRNeasy kit Qiagen. RNA quality was analysed by capillary electrophoresis Bioanalyzer 2100 Agilent. All samples had an RNA integrity number RIN >9. NanoCAGE libraries were generated following a protocol described in: Poulain S. Kato S. Arnaud O. Morlighem J.E. Suzuki M. Plessy C. and Harbers M. 2017 NanoCAGE: A Method for the Analysis of Coding and Noncoding five prime Capped Transcriptomes. Methods Mol Biol 1543 57 109. Experimental Factor: fraction:S/G2/M rapid cycling OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC CAGE SINGLE ILLUMINA Illumina HiSeq 2500   ERP120006 Illumina HiSeq 2500 sequencing; CAGE seq of zebrafish cells extracted at the 14 somite stage and segregated by cell cycle dynamics e.g. fast green vs slow red ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 06 19|ENA LAST UPDATE:2020 02 25 14SomiteGreen2_CTGACG_L003_R1_001.fastq.gz fastq 697971375.0 15510475.0 E MTAB 8795:Green2 0:45 1:0 A:160028926;C:147075253;G:245773112;T:145025474;N:68610 45 0     160028926 147075253 245773112 145025474 68610 ERX3918370 ERS4309128 ERA2381432 UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM|European Nucleotide Archive UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM|European Nucleotide Archive 1 0.00489   0.00085   0.99586   0.80163   45   T   under 1.2% mapping rate illumina hiseq_era unknown cage unknown bulk unknown unknown   United Kingdom 2020-02-13 Segmentation Embryo Whole Organism All anatomical structures
9811 9811 ERR3909545 ERX3918369 ERS4309127 ERP120006 PRJEB36776 CAGE seq of zebrafish cells extracted at the 14 somite stage and segregated by cell cycle dynamics e.g. fast green vs slow red E-MTAB-8795 Transcriptome Analysis The core promoter a stretch of DNA surrounding the transcription start site TSS is a major integration point for regulatory signals controlling gene transcription. Cellular differentiation is marked by divergence in transcriptional repertoire and cell cycling behaviour between cells of different fates. The role promoter associated gene regulatory networks play in development associated transitions in cell cycle dynamics is poorly understood. This study demonstrates in a vertebrate embryo how core promoter variations define transcriptional output in cells transitioning from a proliferative to cell lineage specifying phenotype. Assessment of cell proliferation across zebrafish embryo development using the FUCCI transgenic cell cycle phase marker revealed a spatial and lineage specific separation in cell cycling behaviour. To investigate the role differential promoter usage plays in this process cap analysis of gene expression CAGE was performed on cells segregated by cycling dynamics. ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 06 19|ENA LAST UPDATE:2020 02 13   Protocols: Zebrafish were dechorionated and selected at the 14 somite stage 14 hpf The embryos were dissociated into a single cell suspension using enzyme free cell dissociation buffer PBS based Gibco. Dissociated cells were pelleted and resuspended in Hanks balanced salt solution without xxx chloride or magnesium sulphate Sigma for sorting. Cells were fluorescence associated cell sorted FACS into populations displaying red and green fluorescence. RNA was extracted from isolated cells using the miRNeasy kit Qiagen. RNA quality was analysed by capillary electrophoresis Bioanalyzer 2100 Agilent. All samples had an RNA integrity number RIN >9. NanoCAGE libraries were generated following a protocol described in: Poulain S. Kato S. Arnaud O. Morlighem J.E. Suzuki M. Plessy C. and Harbers M. 2017 NanoCAGE: A Method for the Analysis of Coding and Noncoding five prime Capped Transcriptomes. Methods Mol Biol 1543 57 109. Green1 SAMEA6544752 UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 06 19T17:05:18Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2020 02 13T15:36:56Z|External Id:SAMEA6544752|INSDC center name:UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM|INSDC first public:2020 06 19T17:05:18Z|INSDC last update:2020 02 13T15:36:56Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:E MTAB 8795:Green1|age:14|broker name:ArrayExpress|common name:zebrafish|developmental stage:embryo|fraction:S/G2/M rapid cycling|organism part:whole organism|sample name:E MTAB 8795:Green1|scientific name:Danio rerio|sex:not available|strain:Dual FUCCI                 Illumina HiSeq 2500 sequencing; CAGE seq of zebrafish cells extracted at the 14 somite stage and segregated by cell cycle dynamics e.g. fast green vs slow red E MTAB 8795:Green1 s Green1 s CAGE seq of zebrafish cells extracted at the 14 somite stage and segregated by cell cycle dynamics e.g. fast green vs slow red Zebrafish were dechorionated and selected at the 14 somite stage 14 hpf The embryos were dissociated into a single cell suspension using enzyme free cell dissociation buffer PBS based Gibco. Dissociated cells were pelleted and resuspended in Hanks balanced salt solution without xxx chloride or magnesium sulphate Sigma for sorting. Cells were fluorescence associated cell sorted FACS into populations displaying red and green fluorescence. RNA was extracted from isolated cells using the miRNeasy kit Qiagen. RNA quality was analysed by capillary electrophoresis Bioanalyzer 2100 Agilent. All samples had an RNA integrity number RIN >9. NanoCAGE libraries were generated following a protocol described in: Poulain S. Kato S. Arnaud O. Morlighem J.E. Suzuki M. Plessy C. and Harbers M. 2017 NanoCAGE: A Method for the Analysis of Coding and Noncoding five prime Capped Transcriptomes. Methods Mol Biol 1543 57 109. Experimental Factor: fraction:S/G2/M rapid cycling OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC CAGE SINGLE ILLUMINA Illumina HiSeq 2500   ERP120006 Illumina HiSeq 2500 sequencing; CAGE seq of zebrafish cells extracted at the 14 somite stage and segregated by cell cycle dynamics e.g. fast green vs slow red ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2020 06 19|ENA LAST UPDATE:2020 02 25 14SomiteGreen1_CACTGA_L003_R1_001.fastq.gz fastq 826595640.0 18368792.0 E MTAB 8795:Green1 0:45 1:0 A:193728088;C:171605661;G:287824557;T:173352680;N:84654 45 0     193728088 171605661 287824557 173352680 84654 ERX3918369 ERS4309127 ERA2381432 UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM|European Nucleotide Archive UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM|European Nucleotide Archive 1 0.00505   0.00101   0.99287   0.58198   45   T   under 1.2% mapping rate illumina hiseq_era unknown cage unknown bulk unknown unknown   United Kingdom 2020-02-13 Segmentation Embryo Whole Organism All anatomical structures
10212 10212 ERR6511331 ERX6138167 ERS7264190 ERP131213 PRJEB46978 Nano3P seq: transcriptome wide analysis of gene expression and tail dynamics using end capture nanopore sequencing ena-STUDY-CENTER FOR GENOMIC REGULATION (CRG)-12-08-2021-14:48:52:906-1159 Other Nano3P seq is a simple and robust method to accurately estimate transcript levels tail lengths and tail nucleotide composition information in full length individual reads with minimal library preparation biases both in the coding and non coding transcriptome. ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2023 12 28|ENA LAST UPDATE:2023 12 28   Zebrafish Nano3P seq of PolyA selected sample biological replicate 1 including 4 hpf RNA Zebrafish PolyA 4 hpf SAMEA9541420 CENTER FOR GENOMIC REGULATION (CRG) ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2023 12 28T01:07:23Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2023 12 28T01:07:23Z|External Id:SAMEA9541420|INSDC center name:CENTER FOR GENOMIC REGULATION CRG|INSDC first public:2023 12 28T01:07:23Z|INSDC last update:2023 12 28T01:07:23Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:Zebrafish PolyA 4 hpf|common name:zebrafish|sample name:Zebrafish PolyA 4 hpf|scientific name:Danio rerio                 MinION sequencing ena EXPERIMENT CENTER FOR GENOMIC REGULATION CRG 17 08 2021 13:09:55:665 5 cDNA8523612 Nano3P seq Nano3P seq   OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC unspecified SINGLE OXFORD_NANOPORE MinION   ERP131213 MinION sequencing ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2023 12 28|ENA LAST UPDATE:2023 12 28 zebrafish_polya_4hpf.tar.gz nanopore 330562220.0 233101.0 ena RUN CENTER FOR GENOMIC REGULATION CRG 17 08 2021 13:09:55:665 5 0:1418.11 A:86572446;C:74232962;G:69203462;T:100553350;N:0 1418       86572446 74232962 69203462 100553350 0 ERX6138167 ERS7264190 ERA5757997 CENTER FOR GENOMIC REGULATION (CRG)|European Nucleotide Archive CENTER FOR GENOMIC REGULATION (CRG) 1 0.0   0.0   1.0       1536   T   long read ont ont full_length poly_a unknown bulk unknown unknown   Spain 2023-12-28 Blastula Embryo Undetermined Embryo Imprecise
10213 10213 ERR6511329 ERX6138165 ERS7264188 ERP131213 PRJEB46978 Nano3P seq: transcriptome wide analysis of gene expression and tail dynamics using end capture nanopore sequencing ena-STUDY-CENTER FOR GENOMIC REGULATION (CRG)-12-08-2021-14:48:52:906-1159 Other Nano3P seq is a simple and robust method to accurately estimate transcript levels tail lengths and tail nucleotide composition information in full length individual reads with minimal library preparation biases both in the coding and non coding transcriptome. ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2023 12 28|ENA LAST UPDATE:2023 12 28   Zebrafish Nano3P seq of Ribodepleted sample biological replicate 1 including 2 hpf 4 hpf 6 hpf RNAs Zebrafish Ribodep Rep1 SAMEA9541418 CENTER FOR GENOMIC REGULATION (CRG) ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2023 12 28T01:07:23Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2023 12 28T01:07:23Z|External Id:SAMEA9541418|INSDC center name:CENTER FOR GENOMIC REGULATION CRG|INSDC first public:2023 12 28T01:07:23Z|INSDC last update:2023 12 28T01:07:23Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:Zebrafish Ribodep Rep1|common name:zebrafish|sample name:Zebrafish Ribodep Rep1|scientific name:Danio rerio                 MinION sequencing ena EXPERIMENT CENTER FOR GENOMIC REGULATION CRG 17 08 2021 13:09:55:665 3 cDNA786327 Nano3P seq Nano3P seq   OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC unspecified SINGLE OXFORD_NANOPORE MinION   ERP131213 MinION sequencing ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2023 12 28|ENA LAST UPDATE:2023 12 28 zebrafish_ribodep_rep1.tar.gz nanopore 1745399583.0 1644167.0 ena RUN CENTER FOR GENOMIC REGULATION CRG 17 08 2021 13:09:55:665 3 0:1061.57 A:449704009;C:421915878;G:378879857;T:494899839;N:0 1061       449704009 421915878 378879857 494899839 0 ERX6138165 ERS7264188 ERA5757997 CENTER FOR GENOMIC REGULATION (CRG)|European Nucleotide Archive CENTER FOR GENOMIC REGULATION (CRG) 1 0.01112   0.0   0.99997   1.0   546   T   long read ont ont full_length rrna_depletion unknown bulk unknown unknown   Spain 2023-12-28 Multi-stage Embryo Undetermined Embryo Imprecise
10215 10215 ERR6511330 ERX6138166 ERS7264189 ERP131213 PRJEB46978 Nano3P seq: transcriptome wide analysis of gene expression and tail dynamics using end capture nanopore sequencing ena-STUDY-CENTER FOR GENOMIC REGULATION (CRG)-12-08-2021-14:48:52:906-1159 Other Nano3P seq is a simple and robust method to accurately estimate transcript levels tail lengths and tail nucleotide composition information in full length individual reads with minimal library preparation biases both in the coding and non coding transcriptome. ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2023 12 28|ENA LAST UPDATE:2023 12 28   Zebrafish Nano3P seq of Ribodepleted sample biological replicate 1 including 2 hpf 4 hpf 6 hpf RNAs Zebrafish Ribodep Rep2 SAMEA9541419 CENTER FOR GENOMIC REGULATION (CRG) ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2023 12 28T01:07:23Z|ENA LAST UPDATE:2023 12 28T01:07:23Z|External Id:SAMEA9541419|INSDC center name:CENTER FOR GENOMIC REGULATION CRG|INSDC first public:2023 12 28T01:07:23Z|INSDC last update:2023 12 28T01:07:23Z|INSDC status:public|Submitter Id:Zebrafish Ribodep Rep2|common name:zebrafish|sample name:Zebrafish Ribodep Rep2|scientific name:Danio rerio                 MinION sequencing ena EXPERIMENT CENTER FOR GENOMIC REGULATION CRG 17 08 2021 13:09:55:665 4 cDNA123791 Nano3P seq Nano3P seq   OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC unspecified SINGLE OXFORD_NANOPORE MinION   ERP131213 MinION sequencing ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2023 12 28|ENA LAST UPDATE:2023 12 28 zebrafish_ribodep_rep2.tar.gz nanopore 2038398139.0 1955617.0 ena RUN CENTER FOR GENOMIC REGULATION CRG 17 08 2021 13:09:55:665 4 0:1042.33 A:518369802;C:477535545;G:441294056;T:601198736;N:0 1042       518369802 477535545 441294056 601198736 0 ERX6138166 ERS7264189 ERA5757997 CENTER FOR GENOMIC REGULATION (CRG)|European Nucleotide Archive CENTER FOR GENOMIC REGULATION (CRG)                             ont ont full_length rrna_depletion unknown bulk unknown unknown   Spain 2023-12-28 Multi-stage Embryo Undetermined Embryo Imprecise
25295 25295 SRR25764045 SRX21486723 SRS18719024 SRP457105 PRJNA1009809 Dynamics of the zebrafish tRNAome during the maternal to zygotic transition [Ribo Seq] GSE241753 Other Time course analysis of tRNA abundance during zebrafish early embryonic development. Overall design: Wild type TLAB strain zebrafish embryos were grown in standard housing conditions.Unfertilized eggs 0 hpf were collected or embryos were staged and collected at consecutive developmental time points namelyat the 256 cell 2.5 hpf 1000 cell 3 hpf sphere 4 hpf shield 6 hpf and bud 10 hpf stages. Eggs and embryos were either flash frozen in liquid nitrogen or immediately processed. Samples were used for western blotting analysis polysome profiling ribosome profiling or mRNA and tRNA sequencing for investigating the regulation of tRNA gene expression and translational status during early zebrafish embryogenesis. parent bioproject:PRJNA1009800 pubmed:39402326   WT bud 10 hpf Ribo seq rep1 GSM7734770   source name:Gastrula|strain:TLAB strain|tissue:Gastrula|developmental stage:Bud 10 hpf|treatment:100 µg/ml CHX 100 µg/ml TIG|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing WT bud 10 hpf Ribo seq rep1 We identified the A site location in each mapped read with Scikit ribo [Fang et al. 2018] which uses a random forest with recursive feature selection and a generalized linear model for accurate A site prediction based on matched ribosome profiling and RNA Seq datasets. Kallisto 0.44.0 with parameters b 100 single l 180 s 20 t 40 was used to quantify transcript abundances in Transcripts Per Million TPM from RNA Seq data based on the reference set of MANE annotated transcripts see Codon usage analysis for description of this annotation. To avoid memory errors due to the large size of the human genome and the presence of multiple transcript isoforms all RNAfold dependencies in Scikit ribo were omitted and the index was built separately for each chromosome. To make the hg38 GTF compatible with Scikit ribo transcript/UTR annotations were removed. For each transcript the start codon in the first exon and the stop codon in the last exon were adjusted to represent transcript start and end coordinates taking into account the gene strand. To estimate codon dwell times short 20 23 nt and long 28 33 nt ribosome footprints were analyzed separately. rRNA filtered reads were aligned to GRCz11.108 using STAR v2.6.1c [Dobin et al. 2013] the following options: outFilterMultimapNmax 1 seedSearchStartLmax 15 outSAMtype BAM SortedByCoordinate outFilterMismatchNmax 2 alignEndsType EndToEnd quantMode TranscriptomeSAM outSAMattributes NH HI AS nM NM MD We identified the A site location in each mapped read with Scikit ribo [Fang et al. 2018] which uses a random forest with recursive feature selection and a generalized linear model for accurate A site prediction based on matched ribosome profiling and RNA Seq datasets. Kallisto 0.44.0 with parameters b 100 single l 180 s 20 t 40 was used to quantify transcript abundances in Transcripts Per Million TPM from RNA Seq data based on the reference set of MANE annotated transcripts see Codon usage analysis for description of this annotation. To avoid memory err… Gastrula unperturbed growth conditions in E3 medium for zebrafish embryos. 200 whole embryos were flash frozen in liquid nitrogen and subsequently lysed in footprint lysis buffer containing 100 µg/ml CHX and 100 µg/ml TIG 0.1% NP 40 10 µg/ml aprotinin 20 µM leupeptin 2.5 µM pepstatin A 0.5 mM AEBSF and 1x Phosphatase Inhibitor Cocktail. Samples were vortexed vigorously triturated through a 26G gauge needle and spun down for 7 minutes at 16 000xg/ 4°C. Supernatant was transferred to a new tube. 20 µg RNA in 200 µl polysome lysis buffer were digested with 50 U RNase I for 45 minutes at 2 000 rpm/22°C. post incubation on ice for 5 minutes extracts were pre cleared by centrifugation for 5 minutes at 3 000 g/ 4°C. Ribosomes were pelleted through 3 ml of a sucrose cushion 1 M sucrose 20 mM Tris pH=8.0 140 mM KCl 5 mM MgCl2 1 mM DTT by spinning the layered solutions in the Type 70 Ti rotor for 120 minutes at 50 000 rpm/ 4°C. Ribosome pellets were rinsed once dissolved in 200 µl drug free polysome lysis buffer and incubated with 200 U hiPSC or 300 U NPC RNase I for 45 minutes at 2 000 rpm/22°C. Ribosome footprint libraries were prepared essentially as described McGlincy and Ingolia 2017; Wu 2019 with minor modifications. RNase I digestion was stopped by addition of 100 U Superase In and extracts were loaded on a sucrose cushion. The pellet was dissolved in 400 µl LiDS/LET lysis buffer and RNA was extracted with the acid phenol protocol. Fragments in the range of 19 to 32 nucleotides were isolated by gel size selection with T4 PNK and ligated to pre adenylated adapters containing 5 random nucleotides at their 5’ ends McGlinzy 2017 with T4 RNA Ligase 2 truncated KQ. Adapter ligated RNA was subjected to rRNA depletion using the Ribo Seq riboPOOL h/m/r depletion kit siTOOLs for CHX only samples and legacy RiboZero Gold kit Illumina for CHX+TIG samples The rRNA depleted footprints were reverse transcribed with Protoscript II and cDNA was circularized with recombinant TS2126 RNA ligase 1 commercially available as CircLigase. Libraries were constructed from circularized cDNA with KAP… Embryos were grown in standard housing conditions namely28°C at a 14/10 hour light/dark cycle. strain:TLAB strain|tissue:Gastrula|developmental stage:Bud 10 hpf|treatment:100 µg/ml CHX 100 µg/ml TIG GSM7734770 GSM7734770: WT bud 10 hpf Ribo seq rep1; Danio rerio; OTHER GSM7734770 r1 GSM7734770 1 200 whole embryos were flash frozen in liquid nitrogen and subsequently lysed in footprint lysis buffer containing 100 µg/ml CHX and 100 µg/ml TIG 0.1% NP 40 10 µg/ml aprotinin 20 µM leupeptin 2.5 µM pepstatin A 0.5 mM AEBSF and 1x Phosphatase Inhibitor Cocktail. Samples were vortexed vigorously triturated through a 26G gauge needle and spun down for 7 minutes at 16 000xg/ 4°C. Supernatant was transferred to a new tube. 20 µg RNA in 200 µl polysome lysis buffer were digested with 50 U RNase I for 45 minutes at 2 000 rpm/22°C. post incubation on ice for 5 minutes extracts were pre cleared by centrifugation for 5 minutes at 3 000 g/ 4°C. Ribosomes were pelleted through 3 ml of a sucrose cushion 1 M sucrose 20 mM Tris pH=8.0 140 mM KCl 5 mM MgCl2 1 mM DTT by spinning the layered solutions in the Type 70 Ti rotor for 120 minutes at 50 000 rpm/ 4°C. Ribosome pellets were rinsed once dissolved in 200 µl drug free polysome lysis buffer and incubated with 200 U hiPSC or 300 U NPC RNase I for 45 minutes at 2 000 rpm/22°C. Ribosome footprint libraries were prepared essentially as described McGlincy and Ingolia 2017; Wu 2019 with minor modifications. RNase I digestion was stopped by addition of 100 U Superase In and extracts were loaded on a sucrose cushion. The pellet was dissolved in 400 µl LiDS/LET lysis buffer and RNA was extracted with the acid phenol protocol. Fragments in the range of 19 to 32 nucleotides were isolated by gel size selection with T4 PNK and ligated to pre adenylated adapters containing 5 random nucleotides at their five prime ends McGlinzy 2017 with T4 RNA Ligase 2 truncated KQ. Adapter ligated RNA was subjected to rRNA depletion using the Ribo Seq riboPOOL h/m/r depletion kit siTOOLs for CHX only samples and legacy RiboZero Gold kit Illumina for CHX+TIG samples The rRNA depleted footprints were reverse transcribed with Protoscript II and cDNA was circularized with recombinant TS2126 RNA ligase 1 commercially available as CircLigase. Libraries were constructed from circularized cDNA …   OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC other SINGLE ILLUMINA NextSeq 500   SRP457105     WT_ribo_bud_1.fastq.gz fastq 1476985703.0 55745002.0 GSM7734770 r1 0:26.50 A:266369385;C:466461341;G:473469631;T:270671671;N:13675 26       266369385 466461341 473469631 270671671 13675 SRX21486723 SRS18719024 SRA1700409 Mechanisms of Protein Biogenesis, Max Planck Institute for Biochemistry Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry 1 0.773   0.14121   0.82242   0.78464   30   B   usable mapping rate illumina nextseq 5prime rrna_depletion ribozero bulk unknown unknown   Germany 2023-08-28 Gastrula Embryo Whole Organism All anatomical structures
25296 25296 SRR25764046 SRX21486722 SRS18719023 SRP457105 PRJNA1009809 Dynamics of the zebrafish tRNAome during the maternal to zygotic transition [Ribo Seq] GSE241753 Other Time course analysis of tRNA abundance during zebrafish early embryonic development. Overall design: Wild type TLAB strain zebrafish embryos were grown in standard housing conditions.Unfertilized eggs 0 hpf were collected or embryos were staged and collected at consecutive developmental time points namelyat the 256 cell 2.5 hpf 1000 cell 3 hpf sphere 4 hpf shield 6 hpf and bud 10 hpf stages. Eggs and embryos were either flash frozen in liquid nitrogen or immediately processed. Samples were used for western blotting analysis polysome profiling ribosome profiling or mRNA and tRNA sequencing for investigating the regulation of tRNA gene expression and translational status during early zebrafish embryogenesis. parent bioproject:PRJNA1009800 pubmed:39402326   WT sphere 4 hpf Ribo seq rep1 GSM7734769   source name:Blastula|strain:TLAB strain|tissue:Blastula|developmental stage:Sphere 4 hpf|treatment:100 µg/ml CHX 100 µg/ml TIG|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing WT sphere 4 hpf Ribo seq rep1 We identified the A site location in each mapped read with Scikit ribo [Fang et al. 2018] which uses a random forest with recursive feature selection and a generalized linear model for accurate A site prediction based on matched ribosome profiling and RNA Seq datasets. Kallisto 0.44.0 with parameters b 100 single l 180 s 20 t 40 was used to quantify transcript abundances in Transcripts Per Million TPM from RNA Seq data based on the reference set of MANE annotated transcripts see Codon usage analysis for description of this annotation. To avoid memory errors due to the large size of the human genome and the presence of multiple transcript isoforms all RNAfold dependencies in Scikit ribo were omitted and the index was built separately for each chromosome. To make the hg38 GTF compatible with Scikit ribo transcript/UTR annotations were removed. For each transcript the start codon in the first exon and the stop codon in the last exon were adjusted to represent transcript start and end coordinates taking into account the gene strand. To estimate codon dwell times short 20 23 nt and long 28 33 nt ribosome footprints were analyzed separately. rRNA filtered reads were aligned to GRCz11.108 using STAR v2.6.1c [Dobin et al. 2013] the following options: outFilterMultimapNmax 1 seedSearchStartLmax 15 outSAMtype BAM SortedByCoordinate outFilterMismatchNmax 2 alignEndsType EndToEnd quantMode TranscriptomeSAM outSAMattributes NH HI AS nM NM MD We identified the A site location in each mapped read with Scikit ribo [Fang et al. 2018] which uses a random forest with recursive feature selection and a generalized linear model for accurate A site prediction based on matched ribosome profiling and RNA Seq datasets. Kallisto 0.44.0 with parameters b 100 single l 180 s 20 t 40 was used to quantify transcript abundances in Transcripts Per Million TPM from RNA Seq data based on the reference set of MANE annotated transcripts see Codon usage analysis for description of this annotation. To avoid memory err… Blastula unperturbed growth conditions in E3 medium for zebrafish embryos. 200 whole embryos were flash frozen in liquid nitrogen and subsequently lysed in footprint lysis buffer containing 100 µg/ml CHX and 100 µg/ml TIG 0.1% NP 40 10 µg/ml aprotinin 20 µM leupeptin 2.5 µM pepstatin A 0.5 mM AEBSF and 1x Phosphatase Inhibitor Cocktail. Samples were vortexed vigorously triturated through a 26G gauge needle and spun down for 7 minutes at 16 000xg/ 4°C. Supernatant was transferred to a new tube. 20 µg RNA in 200 µl polysome lysis buffer were digested with 50 U RNase I for 45 minutes at 2 000 rpm/22°C. post incubation on ice for 5 minutes extracts were pre cleared by centrifugation for 5 minutes at 3 000 g/ 4°C. Ribosomes were pelleted through 3 ml of a sucrose cushion 1 M sucrose 20 mM Tris pH=8.0 140 mM KCl 5 mM MgCl2 1 mM DTT by spinning the layered solutions in the Type 70 Ti rotor for 120 minutes at 50 000 rpm/ 4°C. Ribosome pellets were rinsed once dissolved in 200 µl drug free polysome lysis buffer and incubated with 200 U hiPSC or 300 U NPC RNase I for 45 minutes at 2 000 rpm/22°C. Ribosome footprint libraries were prepared essentially as described McGlincy and Ingolia 2017; Wu 2019 with minor modifications. RNase I digestion was stopped by addition of 100 U Superase In and extracts were loaded on a sucrose cushion. The pellet was dissolved in 400 µl LiDS/LET lysis buffer and RNA was extracted with the acid phenol protocol. Fragments in the range of 19 to 32 nucleotides were isolated by gel size selection with T4 PNK and ligated to pre adenylated adapters containing 5 random nucleotides at their 5’ ends McGlinzy 2017 with T4 RNA Ligase 2 truncated KQ. Adapter ligated RNA was subjected to rRNA depletion using the Ribo Seq riboPOOL h/m/r depletion kit siTOOLs for CHX only samples and legacy RiboZero Gold kit Illumina for CHX+TIG samples The rRNA depleted footprints were reverse transcribed with Protoscript II and cDNA was circularized with recombinant TS2126 RNA ligase 1 commercially available as CircLigase. Libraries were constructed from circularized cDNA with KAP… Embryos were grown in standard housing conditions namely28°C at a 14/10 hour light/dark cycle. strain:TLAB strain|tissue:Blastula|developmental stage:Sphere 4 hpf|treatment:100 µg/ml CHX 100 µg/ml TIG GSM7734769 GSM7734769: WT sphere 4 hpf Ribo seq rep1; Danio rerio; OTHER GSM7734769 r1 GSM7734769 1 200 whole embryos were flash frozen in liquid nitrogen and subsequently lysed in footprint lysis buffer containing 100 µg/ml CHX and 100 µg/ml TIG 0.1% NP 40 10 µg/ml aprotinin 20 µM leupeptin 2.5 µM pepstatin A 0.5 mM AEBSF and 1x Phosphatase Inhibitor Cocktail. Samples were vortexed vigorously triturated through a 26G gauge needle and spun down for 7 minutes at 16 000xg/ 4°C. Supernatant was transferred to a new tube. 20 µg RNA in 200 µl polysome lysis buffer were digested with 50 U RNase I for 45 minutes at 2 000 rpm/22°C. post incubation on ice for 5 minutes extracts were pre cleared by centrifugation for 5 minutes at 3 000 g/ 4°C. Ribosomes were pelleted through 3 ml of a sucrose cushion 1 M sucrose 20 mM Tris pH=8.0 140 mM KCl 5 mM MgCl2 1 mM DTT by spinning the layered solutions in the Type 70 Ti rotor for 120 minutes at 50 000 rpm/ 4°C. Ribosome pellets were rinsed once dissolved in 200 µl drug free polysome lysis buffer and incubated with 200 U hiPSC or 300 U NPC RNase I for 45 minutes at 2 000 rpm/22°C. Ribosome footprint libraries were prepared essentially as described McGlincy and Ingolia 2017; Wu 2019 with minor modifications. RNase I digestion was stopped by addition of 100 U Superase In and extracts were loaded on a sucrose cushion. The pellet was dissolved in 400 µl LiDS/LET lysis buffer and RNA was extracted with the acid phenol protocol. Fragments in the range of 19 to 32 nucleotides were isolated by gel size selection with T4 PNK and ligated to pre adenylated adapters containing 5 random nucleotides at their five prime ends McGlinzy 2017 with T4 RNA Ligase 2 truncated KQ. Adapter ligated RNA was subjected to rRNA depletion using the Ribo Seq riboPOOL h/m/r depletion kit siTOOLs for CHX only samples and legacy RiboZero Gold kit Illumina for CHX+TIG samples The rRNA depleted footprints were reverse transcribed with Protoscript II and cDNA was circularized with recombinant TS2126 RNA ligase 1 commercially available as CircLigase. Libraries were constructed from circularized cDNA …   OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC other SINGLE ILLUMINA NextSeq 500   SRP457105     WT_ribo_sphere_1.fastq.gz fastq 1336027898.0 47907512.0 GSM7734769 r1 0:27.89 A:229038284;C:439455963;G:429428292;T:238088512;N:16847 27       229038284 439455963 429428292 238088512 16847 SRX21486722 SRS18719023 SRA1700409 Mechanisms of Protein Biogenesis, Max Planck Institute for Biochemistry Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry 1 0.85867   0.20418   0.8776   0.79481   24   B   usable mapping rate illumina nextseq 5prime rrna_depletion ribozero bulk unknown unknown   Germany 2023-08-28 Blastula Embryo Whole Organism All anatomical structures
29739 29739 SRR27467672 SRX23139234 SRS20090275 SRP482074 PRJNA1061456 tRAM seq: tRNA abundance and modification analysis during zebrafish embryo development PRJNA1061456 Other           Dome mock R2   strain:TLAB fish|isolate:NA|breed:cross of zebrafish AB and the natural variant TL Tupfel Longfin|cultivar:NA|ecotype:NA|dev stage:5 hpf|collection date:2022|geo loc name:Austria|sex:mixed|tissue:whole embryo|treatment:mock|BioSampleModel:Model organism or animal                 tRAM seq of zebrafish: embryo 5 hpf mock rep2 EV04009 EV04009 RNA was extracted with Trizol tRNA isolated by size selection on denaturing polyacrylamide gel range 50 150 nt. The RNA was end repaired by alkaline deacylation and T4 PNK treatment three prime adapter ligated with T4 RNA ligase 2 reverse transcribed with TGIRT. The cDNA was circularized with CircLigase and amplified with KAPA HiFi polymerase using NEB Next indexed primers.     OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC size fractionation SINGLE ILLUMINA NextSeq 500   SRP482074     EV04009.R1.fastq.gz fastq 609590940.0 4354221.0 EV04009.R1.fastq.gz 0:140 A:155062144;C:147628702;G:168099121;T:138772205;N:28768 140       155062144 147628702 168099121 138772205 28768 SRX23139234 SRS20090275 SRA1781872 Medical University of Vienna|Cell and Developmental Biology Medical University of Vienna 1 0.0   0.0   1.0       140   T   under 1.2% mapping rate illumina nextseq unknown size_fractionation nebnext bulk unknown unknown   Austria 2024-01-09 Blastula Embryo Whole Organism All anatomical structures
29740 29740 SRR27467673 SRX23139233 SRS20090278 SRP482074 PRJNA1061456 tRAM seq: tRNA abundance and modification analysis during zebrafish embryo development PRJNA1061456 Other           1K cell BS R2   strain:TLAB fish|isolate:NA|breed:cross of zebrafish AB and the natural variant TL Tupfel Longfin|cultivar:NA|ecotype:NA|dev stage:3 hpf|collection date:2022|geo loc name:Austria|sex:mixed|tissue:whole embryo|treatment:BS|BioSampleModel:Model organism or animal                 tRAM seq of zebrafish: embryo 3 hpf BS rep2 EV04008 EV04008 RNA was extracted with Trizol tRNA isolated by size selection on denaturing polyacrylamide gel range 50 150 nt. The RNA was end repaired by alkaline deacylation and T4 PNK treatment three prime adapter ligated with T4 RNA ligase 2 reverse transcribed with TGIRT. The cDNA was circularized with CircLigase and amplified with KAPA HiFi polymerase using NEB Next indexed primers.     OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC size fractionation SINGLE ILLUMINA NextSeq 500   SRP482074     EV04008.R1.fastq.gz fastq 675505180.0 4825037.0 EV04008.R1.fastq.gz 0:140 A:178823976;C:121648962;G:198428643;T:176572292;N:31307 140       178823976 121648962 198428643 176572292 31307 SRX23139233 SRS20090278 SRA1781872 Medical University of Vienna|Cell and Developmental Biology Medical University of Vienna 1 0.0   0.0   1.0       140   T   under 1.2% mapping rate illumina nextseq unknown size_fractionation nebnext bulk unknown unknown   Austria 2024-01-09 Blastula Embryo Whole Organism All anatomical structures
29741 29741 SRR27467674 SRX23139232 SRS20090272 SRP482074 PRJNA1061456 tRAM seq: tRNA abundance and modification analysis during zebrafish embryo development PRJNA1061456 Other           1K cell DM R2   strain:TLAB fish|isolate:NA|breed:cross of zebrafish AB and the natural variant TL Tupfel Longfin|cultivar:NA|ecotype:NA|dev stage:3 hpf|collection date:2022|geo loc name:Austria|sex:mixed|tissue:whole embryo|treatment:DM|BioSampleModel:Model organism or animal                 tRAM seq of zebrafish: embryo 3 hpf DM rep2 EV04007 EV04007 RNA was extracted with Trizol tRNA isolated by size selection on denaturing polyacrylamide gel range 50 150 nt. The RNA was end repaired by alkaline deacylation and T4 PNK treatment three prime adapter ligated with T4 RNA ligase 2 reverse transcribed with TGIRT. The cDNA was circularized with CircLigase and amplified with KAPA HiFi polymerase using NEB Next indexed primers.     OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC size fractionation SINGLE ILLUMINA NextSeq 500   SRP482074     EV04007.R1.fastq.gz fastq 702064440.0 5014746.0 EV04007.R1.fastq.gz 0:140 A:176719694;C:166467163;G:207893965;T:150951950;N:31668 140       176719694 166467163 207893965 150951950 31668 SRX23139232 SRS20090272 SRA1781872 Medical University of Vienna|Cell and Developmental Biology Medical University of Vienna 1 2e-05   0.0   0.99997   1.0   140   T   under 1.2% mapping rate illumina nextseq unknown size_fractionation nebnext bulk unknown unknown   Austria 2024-01-09 Blastula Embryo Whole Organism All anatomical structures
29742 29742 SRR27467675 SRX23139231 SRS20090271 SRP482074 PRJNA1061456 tRAM seq: tRNA abundance and modification analysis during zebrafish embryo development PRJNA1061456 Other           1K cell mock R2   strain:TLAB fish|isolate:NA|breed:cross of zebrafish AB and the natural variant TL Tupfel Longfin|cultivar:NA|ecotype:NA|dev stage:3 hpf|collection date:2022|geo loc name:Austria|sex:mixed|tissue:whole embryo|treatment:mock|BioSampleModel:Model organism or animal                 tRAM seq of zebrafish: embryo 3 hpf mock rep2 EV04006 EV04006 RNA was extracted with Trizol tRNA isolated by size selection on denaturing polyacrylamide gel range 50 150 nt. The RNA was end repaired by alkaline deacylation and T4 PNK treatment three prime adapter ligated with T4 RNA ligase 2 reverse transcribed with TGIRT. The cDNA was circularized with CircLigase and amplified with KAPA HiFi polymerase using NEB Next indexed primers.     OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC size fractionation SINGLE ILLUMINA NextSeq 500   SRP482074     EV04006.R1.fastq.gz fastq 664790700.0 4748505.0 EV04006.R1.fastq.gz 0:140 A:172014219;C:146545691;G:200358431;T:145840649;N:31710 140       172014219 146545691 200358431 145840649 31710 SRX23139231 SRS20090271 SRA1781872 Medical University of Vienna|Cell and Developmental Biology Medical University of Vienna 1 3e-05   0.0   0.99993   1.0   140   T   under 1.2% mapping rate illumina nextseq unknown size_fractionation nebnext bulk unknown unknown   Austria 2024-01-09 Blastula Embryo Whole Organism All anatomical structures
29743 29743 SRR27467676 SRX23139230 SRS20090273 SRP482074 PRJNA1061456 tRAM seq: tRNA abundance and modification analysis during zebrafish embryo development PRJNA1061456 Other           4 cell DM R2   strain:TLAB fish|isolate:NA|breed:cross of zebrafish AB and the natural variant TL Tupfel Longfin|cultivar:NA|ecotype:NA|dev stage:1 hpf|collection date:2022|geo loc name:Austria|sex:mixed|tissue:whole embryo|treatment:DM|BioSampleModel:Model organism or animal                 tRAM seq of zebrafish: embryo 1 hpf DM rep2 EV04004 EV04004 RNA was extracted with Trizol tRNA isolated by size selection on denaturing polyacrylamide gel range 50 150 nt. The RNA was end repaired by alkaline deacylation and T4 PNK treatment three prime adapter ligated with T4 RNA ligase 2 reverse transcribed with TGIRT. The cDNA was circularized with CircLigase and amplified with KAPA HiFi polymerase using NEB Next indexed primers.     OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC size fractionation SINGLE ILLUMINA NextSeq 500   SRP482074     EV04004.R1.fastq.gz fastq 895671560.0 6397654.0 EV04004.R1.fastq.gz 0:140 A:206443066;C:147067097;G:365386937;T:176734600;N:39860 140       206443066 147067097 365386937 176734600 39860 SRX23139230 SRS20090273 SRA1781872 Medical University of Vienna|Cell and Developmental Biology Medical University of Vienna 1 0.0   0.0   1.0       140   T   under 1.2% mapping rate illumina nextseq unknown size_fractionation nebnext bulk unknown unknown   Austria 2024-01-09 Cleavage Embryo Whole Organism All anatomical structures
29744 29744 SRR27467677 SRX23139229 SRS20090274 SRP482074 PRJNA1061456 tRAM seq: tRNA abundance and modification analysis during zebrafish embryo development PRJNA1061456 Other           4 cell mock R2   strain:TLAB fish|isolate:NA|breed:cross of zebrafish AB and the natural variant TL Tupfel Longfin|cultivar:NA|ecotype:NA|dev stage:1 hpf|collection date:2022|geo loc name:Austria|sex:mixed|tissue:whole embryo|treatment:mock|BioSampleModel:Model organism or animal                 tRAM seq of zebrafish: embryo 1 hpf mock rep2 EV04003 EV04003 RNA was extracted with Trizol tRNA isolated by size selection on denaturing polyacrylamide gel range 50 150 nt. The RNA was end repaired by alkaline deacylation and T4 PNK treatment three prime adapter ligated with T4 RNA ligase 2 reverse transcribed with TGIRT. The cDNA was circularized with CircLigase and amplified with KAPA HiFi polymerase using NEB Next indexed primers.     OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC size fractionation SINGLE ILLUMINA NextSeq 500   SRP482074     EV04003.R1.fastq.gz fastq 664112120.0 4743658.0 EV04003.R1.fastq.gz 0:140 A:163711695;C:142612940;G:211194350;T:146562626;N:30509 140       163711695 142612940 211194350 146562626 30509 SRX23139229 SRS20090274 SRA1781872 Medical University of Vienna|Cell and Developmental Biology Medical University of Vienna 1 2e-05   0.0   0.99997   1.0   140   T   under 1.2% mapping rate illumina nextseq unknown size_fractionation nebnext bulk unknown unknown   Austria 2024-01-09 Cleavage Embryo Whole Organism All anatomical structures
29745 29745 SRR27467678 SRX23139228 SRS20090268 SRP482074 PRJNA1061456 tRAM seq: tRNA abundance and modification analysis during zebrafish embryo development PRJNA1061456 Other           eggs mock R2   strain:TLAB fish|isolate:NA|breed:cross of zebrafish AB and the natural variant TL Tupfel Longfin|cultivar:NA|ecotype:NA|dev stage:activated eggs|collection date:2022|geo loc name:Austria|sex:mixed|tissue:activated eggs|treatment:mock|BioSampleModel:Model organism or animal                 tRAM seq of zebrafish: eggs mock rep2 EV04001 EV04001 RNA was extracted with Trizol tRNA isolated by size selection on denaturing polyacrylamide gel range 50 150 nt. The RNA was end repaired by alkaline deacylation and T4 PNK treatment three prime adapter ligated with T4 RNA ligase 2 reverse transcribed with TGIRT. The cDNA was circularized with CircLigase and amplified with KAPA HiFi polymerase using NEB Next indexed primers.     OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC size fractionation SINGLE ILLUMINA NextSeq 500   SRP482074     EV04001.R1.fastq.gz fastq 970037880.0 6928842.0 EV04001.R1.fastq.gz 0:140 A:258735538;C:237798398;G:268588390;T:204871983;N:43571 140       258735538 237798398 268588390 204871983 43571 SRX23139228 SRS20090268 SRA1781872 Medical University of Vienna|Cell and Developmental Biology Medical University of Vienna 1 0.0   0.0   1.0       140   T   under 1.2% mapping rate illumina nextseq unknown size_fractionation nebnext bulk unknown unknown   Austria 2024-01-09 Undetermined Embryo Undetermined Embryo Imprecise
29747 29747 SRR27467680 SRX23139226 SRS20090267 SRP482074 PRJNA1061456 tRAM seq: tRNA abundance and modification analysis during zebrafish embryo development PRJNA1061456 Other           24h BS R2   strain:TLAB fish|isolate:NA|breed:cross of zebrafish AB and the natural variant TL Tupfel Longfin|cultivar:NA|ecotype:NA|dev stage:24 hpf|collection date:2022|geo loc name:Austria|sex:mixed|tissue:whole embryo|treatment:BS|BioSampleModel:Model organism or animal                 tRAM seq of zebrafish: embryo 24 hpf BS rep2 EV03009 EV03009 RNA was extracted with Trizol tRNA isolated by size selection on denaturing polyacrylamide gel range 50 150 nt. The RNA was end repaired by alkaline deacylation and T4 PNK treatment three prime adapter ligated with T4 RNA ligase 2 reverse transcribed with TGIRT. The cDNA was circularized with CircLigase and amplified with KAPA HiFi polymerase using NEB Next indexed primers.     OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC size fractionation SINGLE ILLUMINA NextSeq 500   SRP482074     EV03009.R1.fastq.gz fastq 168931280.0 2222780.0 EV03009.R1.fastq.gz 0:76 A:49803604;C:36479774;G:37758990;T:44874154;N:14758 76       49803604 36479774 37758990 44874154 14758 SRX23139226 SRS20090267 SRA1781872 Medical University of Vienna|Cell and Developmental Biology Medical University of Vienna 1 0.00034   0.0002   0.99965   0.5   76   T   under 1.2% mapping rate illumina nextseq unknown size_fractionation nebnext bulk unknown unknown   Austria 2024-01-09 Pharyngula Embryo Whole Organism All anatomical structures
29748 29748 SRR27467681 SRX23139225 SRS20090266 SRP482074 PRJNA1061456 tRAM seq: tRNA abundance and modification analysis during zebrafish embryo development PRJNA1061456 Other           24h DM R2   strain:TLAB fish|isolate:NA|breed:cross of zebrafish AB and the natural variant TL Tupfel Longfin|cultivar:NA|ecotype:NA|dev stage:24 hpf|collection date:2022|geo loc name:Austria|sex:mixed|tissue:whole embryo|treatment:DM|BioSampleModel:Model organism or animal                 tRAM seq of zebrafish: embryo 24 hpf DM rep2 EV03008 EV03008 RNA was extracted with Trizol tRNA isolated by size selection on denaturing polyacrylamide gel range 50 150 nt. The RNA was end repaired by alkaline deacylation and T4 PNK treatment three prime adapter ligated with T4 RNA ligase 2 reverse transcribed with TGIRT. The cDNA was circularized with CircLigase and amplified with KAPA HiFi polymerase using NEB Next indexed primers.     OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC size fractionation SINGLE ILLUMINA NextSeq 500   SRP482074     EV03008.R1.fastq.gz fastq 200878792.0 2643142.0 EV03008.R1.fastq.gz 0:76 A:46955288;C:54746275;G:55887832;T:43270561;N:18836 76       46955288 54746275 55887832 43270561 18836 SRX23139225 SRS20090266 SRA1781872 Medical University of Vienna|Cell and Developmental Biology Medical University of Vienna 1 0.29408   0.00737   0.91823   0.54549   76   B   usable mapping rate illumina nextseq unknown size_fractionation nebnext bulk unknown unknown   Austria 2024-01-09 Pharyngula Embryo Whole Organism All anatomical structures
29749 29749 SRR27467682 SRX23139224 SRS20090269 SRP482074 PRJNA1061456 tRAM seq: tRNA abundance and modification analysis during zebrafish embryo development PRJNA1061456 Other           24h mock R2   strain:TLAB fish|isolate:NA|breed:cross of zebrafish AB and the natural variant TL Tupfel Longfin|cultivar:NA|ecotype:NA|dev stage:24 hpf|collection date:2022|geo loc name:Austria|sex:mixed|tissue:whole embryo|treatment:mock|BioSampleModel:Model organism or animal                 tRAM seq of zebrafish: embryo 24 hpf mock rep2 EV03007 EV03007 RNA was extracted with Trizol tRNA isolated by size selection on denaturing polyacrylamide gel range 50 150 nt. The RNA was end repaired by alkaline deacylation and T4 PNK treatment three prime adapter ligated with T4 RNA ligase 2 reverse transcribed with TGIRT. The cDNA was circularized with CircLigase and amplified with KAPA HiFi polymerase using NEB Next indexed primers.     OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC size fractionation SINGLE ILLUMINA NextSeq 500   SRP482074     EV03007.R1.fastq.gz fastq 175642840.0 2311090.0 EV03007.R1.fastq.gz 0:76 A:44745275;C:48908904;G:44862157;T:37111895;N:14609 76       44745275 48908904 44862157 37111895 14609 SRX23139224 SRS20090269 SRA1781872 Medical University of Vienna|Cell and Developmental Biology Medical University of Vienna 1 0.06887   0.00273   0.96623   0.48721   76   B   usable mapping rate illumina nextseq unknown size_fractionation nebnext bulk unknown unknown   Austria 2024-01-09 Pharyngula Embryo Whole Organism All anatomical structures
29750 29750 SRR27467683 SRX23139223 SRS20090265 SRP482074 PRJNA1061456 tRAM seq: tRNA abundance and modification analysis during zebrafish embryo development PRJNA1061456 Other           Bud BS R2   strain:TLAB fish|isolate:NA|breed:cross of zebrafish AB and the natural variant TL Tupfel Longfin|cultivar:NA|ecotype:NA|dev stage:10 hpf|collection date:2022|geo loc name:Austria|sex:mixed|tissue:whole embryo|treatment:BS|BioSampleModel:Model organism or animal                 tRAM seq of zebrafish: embryo 10 hpf BS rep2 EV04014 EV04014 RNA was extracted with Trizol tRNA isolated by size selection on denaturing polyacrylamide gel range 50 150 nt. The RNA was end repaired by alkaline deacylation and T4 PNK treatment three prime adapter ligated with T4 RNA ligase 2 reverse transcribed with TGIRT. The cDNA was circularized with CircLigase and amplified with KAPA HiFi polymerase using NEB Next indexed primers.     OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC size fractionation SINGLE ILLUMINA NextSeq 500   SRP482074     EV04014.R1.fastq.gz fastq 774901260.0 5535009.0 EV04014.R1.fastq.gz 0:140 A:193865579;C:138861953;G:251102013;T:191036071;N:35644 140       193865579 138861953 251102013 191036071 35644 SRX23139223 SRS20090265 SRA1781872 Medical University of Vienna|Cell and Developmental Biology Medical University of Vienna 1 0.0   0.0   1.0       140   T   under 1.2% mapping rate illumina nextseq unknown size_fractionation nebnext bulk unknown unknown   Austria 2024-01-09 Gastrula Embryo Whole Organism All anatomical structures
29751 29751 SRR27467684 SRX23139222 SRS20090264 SRP482074 PRJNA1061456 tRAM seq: tRNA abundance and modification analysis during zebrafish embryo development PRJNA1061456 Other           Bud DM R2   strain:TLAB fish|isolate:NA|breed:cross of zebrafish AB and the natural variant TL Tupfel Longfin|cultivar:NA|ecotype:NA|dev stage:10 hpf|collection date:2022|geo loc name:Austria|sex:mixed|tissue:whole embryo|treatment:DM|BioSampleModel:Model organism or animal                 tRAM seq of zebrafish: embryo 10 hpf DM rep2 EV04013 EV04013 RNA was extracted with Trizol tRNA isolated by size selection on denaturing polyacrylamide gel range 50 150 nt. The RNA was end repaired by alkaline deacylation and T4 PNK treatment three prime adapter ligated with T4 RNA ligase 2 reverse transcribed with TGIRT. The cDNA was circularized with CircLigase and amplified with KAPA HiFi polymerase using NEB Next indexed primers.     OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC size fractionation SINGLE ILLUMINA NextSeq 500   SRP482074     EV04013.R1.fastq.gz fastq 666372840.0 4759806.0 EV04013.R1.fastq.gz 0:140 A:172923134;C:142243998;G:211584978;T:139591020;N:29710 140       172923134 142243998 211584978 139591020 29710 SRX23139222 SRS20090264 SRA1781872 Medical University of Vienna|Cell and Developmental Biology Medical University of Vienna 1 3e-05   0.0   0.99991   1.0   140   T   under 1.2% mapping rate illumina nextseq unknown size_fractionation nebnext bulk unknown unknown   Austria 2024-01-09 Gastrula Embryo Whole Organism All anatomical structures
29752 29752 SRR27467685 SRX23139221 SRS20090262 SRP482074 PRJNA1061456 tRAM seq: tRNA abundance and modification analysis during zebrafish embryo development PRJNA1061456 Other           Bud mock R2   strain:TLAB fish|isolate:NA|breed:cross of zebrafish AB and the natural variant TL Tupfel Longfin|cultivar:NA|ecotype:NA|dev stage:10 hpf|collection date:2022|geo loc name:Austria|sex:mixed|tissue:whole embryo|treatment:mock|BioSampleModel:Model organism or animal                 tRAM seq of zebrafish: embryo 10 hpf mock rep2 EV04012 EV04012 RNA was extracted with Trizol tRNA isolated by size selection on denaturing polyacrylamide gel range 50 150 nt. The RNA was end repaired by alkaline deacylation and T4 PNK treatment three prime adapter ligated with T4 RNA ligase 2 reverse transcribed with TGIRT. The cDNA was circularized with CircLigase and amplified with KAPA HiFi polymerase using NEB Next indexed primers.     OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC size fractionation SINGLE ILLUMINA NextSeq 500   SRP482074     EV04012.R1.fastq.gz fastq 628769540.0 4491211.0 EV04012.R1.fastq.gz 0:140 A:160925901;C:143204697;G:183224867;T:141385307;N:28768 140       160925901 143204697 183224867 141385307 28768 SRX23139221 SRS20090262 SRA1781872 Medical University of Vienna|Cell and Developmental Biology Medical University of Vienna 1 1e-05   0.0   0.99997   1.0   140   T   under 1.2% mapping rate illumina nextseq unknown size_fractionation nebnext bulk unknown unknown   Austria 2024-01-09 Gastrula Embryo Whole Organism All anatomical structures
29753 29753 SRR27467686 SRX23139220 SRS20090263 SRP482074 PRJNA1061456 tRAM seq: tRNA abundance and modification analysis during zebrafish embryo development PRJNA1061456 Other           Dome BS R2   strain:TLAB fish|isolate:NA|breed:cross of zebrafish AB and the natural variant TL Tupfel Longfin|cultivar:NA|ecotype:NA|dev stage:5 hpf|collection date:2022|geo loc name:Austria|sex:mixed|tissue:whole embryo|treatment:BS|BioSampleModel:Model organism or animal                 tRAM seq of zebrafish: embryo 5 hpf BS rep2 EV04011 EV04011 RNA was extracted with Trizol tRNA isolated by size selection on denaturing polyacrylamide gel range 50 150 nt. The RNA was end repaired by alkaline deacylation and T4 PNK treatment three prime adapter ligated with T4 RNA ligase 2 reverse transcribed with TGIRT. The cDNA was circularized with CircLigase and amplified with KAPA HiFi polymerase using NEB Next indexed primers.     OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC size fractionation SINGLE ILLUMINA NextSeq 500   SRP482074     EV04011.R1.fastq.gz fastq 720913200.0 5149380.0 EV04011.R1.fastq.gz 0:140 A:185414155;C:126110104;G:238649631;T:170706590;N:32720 140       185414155 126110104 238649631 170706590 32720 SRX23139220 SRS20090263 SRA1781872 Medical University of Vienna|Cell and Developmental Biology Medical University of Vienna 1 0.0   0.0   1.0       140   T   under 1.2% mapping rate illumina nextseq unknown size_fractionation nebnext bulk unknown unknown   Austria 2024-01-09 Blastula Embryo Whole Organism All anatomical structures
29754 29754 SRR27467687 SRX23139219 SRS20090259 SRP482074 PRJNA1061456 tRAM seq: tRNA abundance and modification analysis during zebrafish embryo development PRJNA1061456 Other           Dome DM R2   strain:TLAB fish|isolate:NA|breed:cross of zebrafish AB and the natural variant TL Tupfel Longfin|cultivar:NA|ecotype:NA|dev stage:5 hpf|collection date:2022|geo loc name:Austria|sex:mixed|tissue:whole embryo|treatment:DM|BioSampleModel:Model organism or animal                 tRAM seq of zebrafish: embryo 5 hpf DM rep2 EV04010 EV04010 RNA was extracted with Trizol tRNA isolated by size selection on denaturing polyacrylamide gel range 50 150 nt. The RNA was end repaired by alkaline deacylation and T4 PNK treatment three prime adapter ligated with T4 RNA ligase 2 reverse transcribed with TGIRT. The cDNA was circularized with CircLigase and amplified with KAPA HiFi polymerase using NEB Next indexed primers.     OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC size fractionation SINGLE ILLUMINA NextSeq 500   SRP482074     EV04010.R1.fastq.gz fastq 443650200.0 3168930.0 EV04010.R1.fastq.gz 0:140 A:114663509;C:102512276;G:135709753;T:90744641;N:20021 140       114663509 102512276 135709753 90744641 20021 SRX23139219 SRS20090259 SRA1781872 Medical University of Vienna|Cell and Developmental Biology Medical University of Vienna 1 1e-05   0.0   0.99997   1.0   140   T   under 1.2% mapping rate illumina nextseq unknown size_fractionation nebnext bulk unknown unknown   Austria 2024-01-09 Blastula Embryo Whole Organism All anatomical structures
29757 29757 SRR27437477 SRX23109820 SRS20064574 SRP482074 PRJNA1061456 tRAM seq: tRNA abundance and modification analysis during zebrafish embryo development PRJNA1061456 Other           1K cell mock R3   strain:TLAB fish|breed:cross of zebrafish AB and the natural variant TL Tupfel Longfin|dev stage:3 hpf|collection date:2022|geo loc name:Austria|sex:mixed|tissue:whole embryo|treatment:mock|BioSampleModel:Model organism or animal                 tRAM seq of zebrafish: embryo 3 hpf mock rep3 EV07007 EV07007 RNA was extracted with Trizol tRNA isolated by size selection on denaturing polyacrylamide gel range 50 150 nt. The RNA was end repaired by alkaline deacylation and T4 PNK treatment three prime adapter ligated with T4 RNA ligase 2 reverse transcribed with TGIRT. The cDNA was circularized with CircLigase and amplified with KAPA HiFi polymerase using NEB Next indexed primers.     OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC size fractionation SINGLE ILLUMINA NextSeq 500   SRP482074     EV07007.R1.fastq.gz fastq 479994620.0 3428533.0 EV07007.R1.fastq.gz 0:140 A:124628886;C:116843590;G:123136721;T:115372734;N:12689 140       124628886 116843590 123136721 115372734 12689 SRX23109820 SRS20064574 SRA1780298 Medical University of Vienna|Cell and Developmental Biology Medical University of Vienna 1 6e-05   1e-05   0.99989   1.0   140   T   under 1.2% mapping rate illumina nextseq unknown size_fractionation nebnext bulk unknown unknown   Austria 2024-01-06 Blastula Embryo Whole Organism All anatomical structures
29758 29758 SRR27437478 SRX23109819 SRS20064573 SRP482074 PRJNA1061456 tRAM seq: tRNA abundance and modification analysis during zebrafish embryo development PRJNA1061456 Other           4 cell BS R3   strain:TLAB fish|breed:cross of zebrafish AB and the natural variant TL Tupfel Longfin|dev stage:1 hpf|collection date:2022|geo loc name:Austria|sex:mixed|tissue:whole embryo|treatment:BS|BioSampleModel:Model organism or animal                 tRAM seq of zebrafish: embryo 1 hpf BS rep3 EV07006 EV07006 RNA was extracted with Trizol tRNA isolated by size selection on denaturing polyacrylamide gel range 50 150 nt. The RNA was end repaired by alkaline deacylation and T4 PNK treatment three prime adapter ligated with T4 RNA ligase 2 reverse transcribed with TGIRT. The cDNA was circularized with CircLigase and amplified with KAPA HiFi polymerase using NEB Next indexed primers.     OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC size fractionation SINGLE ILLUMINA NextSeq 500   SRP482074     EV07006.R1.fastq.gz fastq 2584527680.0 18460912.0 EV07006.R1.fastq.gz 0:140 A:685107500;C:367766834;G:717359848;T:814224206;N:69292 140       685107500 367766834 717359848 814224206 69292 SRX23109819 SRS20064573 SRA1780298 Medical University of Vienna|Cell and Developmental Biology Medical University of Vienna 1 2e-05   1e-05   1.0       140   T   under 1.2% mapping rate illumina nextseq unknown size_fractionation nebnext bulk unknown unknown   Austria 2024-01-06 Cleavage Embryo Whole Organism All anatomical structures
29759 29759 SRR27437479 SRX23109818 SRS20064571 SRP482074 PRJNA1061456 tRAM seq: tRNA abundance and modification analysis during zebrafish embryo development PRJNA1061456 Other           4 cell DM R3   strain:TLAB fish|breed:cross of zebrafish AB and the natural variant TL Tupfel Longfin|dev stage:1 hpf|collection date:2022|geo loc name:Austria|sex:mixed|tissue:whole embryo|treatment:DM|BioSampleModel:Model organism or animal                 tRAM seq of zebrafish: embryo 1 hpf DM rep3 EV07005 EV07005 RNA was extracted with Trizol tRNA isolated by size selection on denaturing polyacrylamide gel range 50 150 nt. The RNA was end repaired by alkaline deacylation and T4 PNK treatment three prime adapter ligated with T4 RNA ligase 2 reverse transcribed with TGIRT. The cDNA was circularized with CircLigase and amplified with KAPA HiFi polymerase using NEB Next indexed primers.     OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC size fractionation SINGLE ILLUMINA NextSeq 500   SRP482074     EV07005.R1.fastq.gz fastq 713829480.0 5098782.0 EV07005.R1.fastq.gz 0:140 A:183575304;C:168886779;G:213156258;T:148191838;N:19301 140       183575304 168886779 213156258 148191838 19301 SRX23109818 SRS20064571 SRA1780298 Medical University of Vienna|Cell and Developmental Biology Medical University of Vienna 1 5e-05   0.0   0.99989   1.0   140   T   under 1.2% mapping rate illumina nextseq unknown size_fractionation nebnext bulk unknown unknown   Austria 2024-01-06 Cleavage Embryo Whole Organism All anatomical structures
29760 29760 SRR27437480 SRX23109817 SRS20064572 SRP482074 PRJNA1061456 tRAM seq: tRNA abundance and modification analysis during zebrafish embryo development PRJNA1061456 Other           4 cell mock R3   strain:TLAB fish|breed:cross of zebrafish AB and the natural variant TL Tupfel Longfin|dev stage:1 hpf|collection date:2022|geo loc name:Austria|sex:mixed|tissue:whole embryo|treatment:mock|BioSampleModel:Model organism or animal                 tRAM seq of zebrafish: embryo 1 hpf mock rep3 EV07004 EV07004 RNA was extracted with Trizol tRNA isolated by size selection on denaturing polyacrylamide gel range 50 150 nt. The RNA was end repaired by alkaline deacylation and T4 PNK treatment three prime adapter ligated with T4 RNA ligase 2 reverse transcribed with TGIRT. The cDNA was circularized with CircLigase and amplified with KAPA HiFi polymerase using NEB Next indexed primers.     OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC size fractionation SINGLE ILLUMINA NextSeq 500   SRP482074     EV07004.R1.fastq.gz fastq 517336680.0 3695262.0 EV07004.R1.fastq.gz 0:140 A:136783049;C:131207858;G:139873280;T:109458276;N:14217 140       136783049 131207858 139873280 109458276 14217 SRX23109817 SRS20064572 SRA1780298 Medical University of Vienna|Cell and Developmental Biology Medical University of Vienna 1 7e-05   0.0   0.99981   0.7   140   T   under 1.2% mapping rate illumina nextseq unknown size_fractionation nebnext bulk unknown unknown   Austria 2024-01-06 Cleavage Embryo Whole Organism All anatomical structures
29761 29761 SRR27437481 SRX23109816 SRS20064569 SRP482074 PRJNA1061456 tRAM seq: tRNA abundance and modification analysis during zebrafish embryo development PRJNA1061456 Other           eggs BS R3   strain:TLAB fish|breed:cross of zebrafish AB and the natural variant TL Tupfel Longfin|dev stage:activated eggs|collection date:2022|geo loc name:Austria|sex:mixed|tissue:activated eggs|treatment:BS|BioSampleModel:Model organism or animal                 tRAM seq of zebrafish: eggs BS rep3 EV07003 EV07003 RNA was extracted with Trizol tRNA isolated by size selection on denaturing polyacrylamide gel range 50 150 nt. The RNA was end repaired by alkaline deacylation and T4 PNK treatment three prime adapter ligated with T4 RNA ligase 2 reverse transcribed with TGIRT. The cDNA was circularized with CircLigase and amplified with KAPA HiFi polymerase using NEB Next indexed primers.     OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC size fractionation SINGLE ILLUMINA NextSeq 500   SRP482074     EV07003.R1.fastq.gz fastq 688960160.0 4921144.0 EV07003.R1.fastq.gz 0:140 A:187831021;C:119362814;G:195214528;T:186533242;N:18555 140       187831021 119362814 195214528 186533242 18555 SRX23109816 SRS20064569 SRA1780298 Medical University of Vienna|Cell and Developmental Biology Medical University of Vienna 1 0.0   0.0   1.0       140   T   under 1.2% mapping rate illumina nextseq unknown size_fractionation nebnext bulk unknown unknown   Austria 2024-01-06 Undetermined Embryo Undetermined Embryo Imprecise
29762 29762 SRR27437482 SRX23109815 SRS20064568 SRP482074 PRJNA1061456 tRAM seq: tRNA abundance and modification analysis during zebrafish embryo development PRJNA1061456 Other           eggs DM R3   strain:TLAB fish|breed:cross of zebrafish AB and the natural variant TL Tupfel Longfin|dev stage:activated eggs|collection date:2022|geo loc name:Austria|sex:mixed|tissue:activated eggs|treatment:DM|BioSampleModel:Model organism or animal                 tRAM seq of zebrafish: eggs DM rep3 EV07002 EV07002 RNA was extracted with Trizol tRNA isolated by size selection on denaturing polyacrylamide gel range 50 150 nt. The RNA was end repaired by alkaline deacylation and T4 PNK treatment three prime adapter ligated with T4 RNA ligase 2 reverse transcribed with TGIRT. The cDNA was circularized with CircLigase and amplified with KAPA HiFi polymerase using NEB Next indexed primers.     OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC size fractionation SINGLE ILLUMINA NextSeq 500   SRP482074     EV07002.R1.fastq.gz fastq 520725380.0 3719467.0 EV07002.R1.fastq.gz 0:140 A:138972126;C:125739732;G:142785467;T:113214166;N:13889 140       138972126 125739732 142785467 113214166 13889 SRX23109815 SRS20064568 SRA1780298 Medical University of Vienna|Cell and Developmental Biology Medical University of Vienna 1 0.00014   1e-05   0.99969   0.5   140   T   under 1.2% mapping rate illumina nextseq unknown size_fractionation nebnext bulk unknown unknown   Austria 2024-01-06 Undetermined Embryo Undetermined Embryo Imprecise
29763 29763 SRR27437483 SRX23109814 SRS20064570 SRP482074 PRJNA1061456 tRAM seq: tRNA abundance and modification analysis during zebrafish embryo development PRJNA1061456 Other           eggs mock R3   strain:TLAB fish|breed:cross of zebrafish AB and the natural variant TL Tupfel Longfin|dev stage:activated eggs|collection date:2022|geo loc name:Austria|sex:mixed|tissue:activated eggs|treatment:mock|BioSampleModel:Model organism or animal                 tRAM seq of zebrafish: eggs mock rep3 EV07001 EV07001 RNA was extracted with Trizol tRNA isolated by size selection on denaturing polyacrylamide gel range 50 150 nt. The RNA was end repaired by alkaline deacylation and T4 PNK treatment three prime adapter ligated with T4 RNA ligase 2 reverse transcribed with TGIRT. The cDNA was circularized with CircLigase and amplified with KAPA HiFi polymerase using NEB Next indexed primers.     OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC size fractionation SINGLE ILLUMINA NextSeq 500   SRP482074     EV07001.R1.fastq.gz fastq 684538960.0 4889564.0 EV07001.R1.fastq.gz 0:140 A:178906891;C:169237174;G:192342342;T:144034095;N:18458 140       178906891 169237174 192342342 144034095 18458 SRX23109814 SRS20064570 SRA1780298 Medical University of Vienna|Cell and Developmental Biology Medical University of Vienna 1 0.0001   1e-05   0.99977   0.76923   140   T   under 1.2% mapping rate illumina nextseq unknown size_fractionation nebnext bulk unknown unknown   Austria 2024-01-06 Undetermined Embryo Undetermined Embryo Imprecise
29764 29764 SRR27437484 SRX23109813 SRS20064567 SRP482074 PRJNA1061456 tRAM seq: tRNA abundance and modification analysis during zebrafish embryo development PRJNA1061456 Other           24h BS R3   strain:TLAB fish|breed:cross of zebrafish AB and the natural variant TL Tupfel Longfin|dev stage:24 hpf|collection date:2022|geo loc name:Austria|sex:mixed|tissue:whole embryo|treatment:BS|BioSampleModel:Model organism or animal                 tRAM seq of zebrafish: embryo 24 hpf BS rep3 EV07018 EV07018 RNA was extracted with Trizol tRNA isolated by size selection on denaturing polyacrylamide gel range 50 150 nt. The RNA was end repaired by alkaline deacylation and T4 PNK treatment three prime adapter ligated with T4 RNA ligase 2 reverse transcribed with TGIRT. The cDNA was circularized with CircLigase and amplified with KAPA HiFi polymerase using NEB Next indexed primers.     OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC size fractionation SINGLE ILLUMINA NextSeq 500   SRP482074     EV07018.R1.fastq.gz fastq 887731180.0 6340937.0 EV07018.R1.fastq.gz 0:140 A:204102176;C:148262233;G:350287017;T:185056779;N:22975 140       204102176 148262233 350287017 185056779 22975 SRX23109813 SRS20064567 SRA1780298 Medical University of Vienna|Cell and Developmental Biology Medical University of Vienna 1 0.0   0.0   1.0       140   T   under 1.2% mapping rate illumina nextseq unknown size_fractionation nebnext bulk unknown unknown   Austria 2024-01-06 Pharyngula Embryo Whole Organism All anatomical structures
29765 29765 SRR27437485 SRX23109812 SRS20064566 SRP482074 PRJNA1061456 tRAM seq: tRNA abundance and modification analysis during zebrafish embryo development PRJNA1061456 Other           ovary BS R3   strain:TLAB fish|breed:cross of zebrafish AB and the natural variant TL Tupfel Longfin|dev stage:adult|collection date:2022|geo loc name:Austria|sex:female|tissue:ovary|treatment:BS|BioSampleModel:Model organism or animal                 tRAM seq of zebrafish: ovary BS rep3 EV04017 EV04017 RNA was extracted with Trizol tRNA isolated by size selection on denaturing polyacrylamide gel range 50 150 nt. The RNA was end repaired by alkaline deacylation and T4 PNK treatment three prime adapter ligated with T4 RNA ligase 2 reverse transcribed with TGIRT. The cDNA was circularized with CircLigase and amplified with KAPA HiFi polymerase using NEB Next indexed primers.     OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC size fractionation SINGLE ILLUMINA NextSeq 500   SRP482074     EV04017.R1.fastq.gz fastq 576584540.0 4118461.0 EV04017.R1.fastq.gz 0:140 A:149516980;C:91163801;G:169046762;T:166831111;N:25886 140       149516980 91163801 169046762 166831111 25886 SRX23109812 SRS20064566 SRA1780298 Medical University of Vienna|Cell and Developmental Biology Medical University of Vienna 1 0.0   0.0   1.0       140   T   under 1.2% mapping rate illumina nextseq unknown size_fractionation nebnext bulk unknown unknown   Austria 2024-01-06 Adult Adult Gonad Reproductive System
29766 29766 SRR27437486 SRX23109811 SRS20064565 SRP482074 PRJNA1061456 tRAM seq: tRNA abundance and modification analysis during zebrafish embryo development PRJNA1061456 Other           24h DM R3   strain:TLAB fish|breed:cross of zebrafish AB and the natural variant TL Tupfel Longfin|dev stage:24 hpf|collection date:2022|geo loc name:Austria|sex:mixed|tissue:whole embryo|treatment:DM|BioSampleModel:Model organism or animal                 tRAM seq of zebrafish: embryo 24 hpf DM rep3 EV07017 EV07017 RNA was extracted with Trizol tRNA isolated by size selection on denaturing polyacrylamide gel range 50 150 nt. The RNA was end repaired by alkaline deacylation and T4 PNK treatment three prime adapter ligated with T4 RNA ligase 2 reverse transcribed with TGIRT. The cDNA was circularized with CircLigase and amplified with KAPA HiFi polymerase using NEB Next indexed primers.     OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC size fractionation SINGLE ILLUMINA NextSeq 500   SRP482074     EV07017.R1.fastq.gz fastq 466089960.0 3329214.0 EV07017.R1.fastq.gz 0:140 A:117818387;C:108651920;G:144753443;T:94853810;N:12400 140       117818387 108651920 144753443 94853810 12400 SRX23109811 SRS20064565 SRA1780298 Medical University of Vienna|Cell and Developmental Biology Medical University of Vienna 1 0.0   0.0   1.0       140   T   under 1.2% mapping rate illumina nextseq unknown size_fractionation nebnext bulk unknown unknown   Austria 2024-01-06 Pharyngula Embryo Whole Organism All anatomical structures
29767 29767 SRR27437487 SRX23109810 SRS20064563 SRP482074 PRJNA1061456 tRAM seq: tRNA abundance and modification analysis during zebrafish embryo development PRJNA1061456 Other           24h mock R3   strain:TLAB fish|breed:cross of zebrafish AB and the natural variant TL Tupfel Longfin|dev stage:24 hpf|collection date:2022|geo loc name:Austria|sex:mixed|tissue:whole embryo|treatment:mock|BioSampleModel:Model organism or animal                 tRAM seq of zebrafish: embryo 24 hpf mock rep3 EV07016 EV07016 RNA was extracted with Trizol tRNA isolated by size selection on denaturing polyacrylamide gel range 50 150 nt. The RNA was end repaired by alkaline deacylation and T4 PNK treatment three prime adapter ligated with T4 RNA ligase 2 reverse transcribed with TGIRT. The cDNA was circularized with CircLigase and amplified with KAPA HiFi polymerase using NEB Next indexed primers.     OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC size fractionation SINGLE ILLUMINA NextSeq 500   SRP482074     EV07016.R1.fastq.gz fastq 638674120.0 4561958.0 EV07016.R1.fastq.gz 0:140 A:159572532;C:147135537;G:186885553;T:145063254;N:17244 140       159572532 147135537 186885553 145063254 17244 SRX23109810 SRS20064563 SRA1780298 Medical University of Vienna|Cell and Developmental Biology Medical University of Vienna 1 4e-05   0.0   0.99993   0.0   140   T   under 1.2% mapping rate illumina nextseq unknown size_fractionation nebnext bulk unknown unknown   Austria 2024-01-06 Pharyngula Embryo Whole Organism All anatomical structures
29768 29768 SRR27437488 SRX23109809 SRS20064564 SRP482074 PRJNA1061456 tRAM seq: tRNA abundance and modification analysis during zebrafish embryo development PRJNA1061456 Other           Bud BS R3   strain:TLAB fish|breed:cross of zebrafish AB and the natural variant TL Tupfel Longfin|dev stage:10 hpf|collection date:2022|geo loc name:Austria|sex:mixed|tissue:whole embryo|treatment:BS|BioSampleModel:Model organism or animal                 tRAM seq of zebrafish: embryo 10 hpf BS rep3 EV07015 EV07015 RNA was extracted with Trizol tRNA isolated by size selection on denaturing polyacrylamide gel range 50 150 nt. The RNA was end repaired by alkaline deacylation and T4 PNK treatment three prime adapter ligated with T4 RNA ligase 2 reverse transcribed with TGIRT. The cDNA was circularized with CircLigase and amplified with KAPA HiFi polymerase using NEB Next indexed primers.     OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC size fractionation SINGLE ILLUMINA NextSeq 500   SRP482074     EV07015.R1.fastq.gz fastq 598389400.0 4274210.0 EV07015.R1.fastq.gz 0:140 A:150315140;C:106310211;G:186765596;T:154982225;N:16228 140       150315140 106310211 186765596 154982225 16228 SRX23109809 SRS20064564 SRA1780298 Medical University of Vienna|Cell and Developmental Biology Medical University of Vienna 1 0.0   0.0   1.0       140   T   under 1.2% mapping rate illumina nextseq unknown size_fractionation nebnext bulk unknown unknown   Austria 2024-01-06 Gastrula Embryo Whole Organism All anatomical structures
29769 29769 SRR27437489 SRX23109808 SRS20064562 SRP482074 PRJNA1061456 tRAM seq: tRNA abundance and modification analysis during zebrafish embryo development PRJNA1061456 Other           Bud DM R3   strain:TLAB fish|breed:cross of zebrafish AB and the natural variant TL Tupfel Longfin|dev stage:10 hpf|collection date:2022|geo loc name:Austria|sex:mixed|tissue:whole embryo|treatment:DM|BioSampleModel:Model organism or animal                 tRAM seq of zebrafish: embryo 10 hpf DM rep3 EV07014 EV07014 RNA was extracted with Trizol tRNA isolated by size selection on denaturing polyacrylamide gel range 50 150 nt. The RNA was end repaired by alkaline deacylation and T4 PNK treatment three prime adapter ligated with T4 RNA ligase 2 reverse transcribed with TGIRT. The cDNA was circularized with CircLigase and amplified with KAPA HiFi polymerase using NEB Next indexed primers.     OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC size fractionation SINGLE ILLUMINA NextSeq 500   SRP482074     EV07014.R1.fastq.gz fastq 739056780.0 5278977.0 EV07014.R1.fastq.gz 0:140 A:197948890;C:178761090;G:200265458;T:162060992;N:20350 140       197948890 178761090 200265458 162060992 20350 SRX23109808 SRS20064562 SRA1780298 Medical University of Vienna|Cell and Developmental Biology Medical University of Vienna 1 3e-05   0.0   0.99995   0.5   140   T   under 1.2% mapping rate illumina nextseq unknown size_fractionation nebnext bulk unknown unknown   Austria 2024-01-06 Gastrula Embryo Whole Organism All anatomical structures
29770 29770 SRR27437490 SRX23109807 SRS20064561 SRP482074 PRJNA1061456 tRAM seq: tRNA abundance and modification analysis during zebrafish embryo development PRJNA1061456 Other           Bud mock R3   strain:TLAB fish|breed:cross of zebrafish AB and the natural variant TL Tupfel Longfin|dev stage:10 hpf|collection date:2022|geo loc name:Austria|sex:mixed|tissue:whole embryo|treatment:mock|BioSampleModel:Model organism or animal                 tRAM seq of zebrafish: embryo 10 hpf mock rep3 EV07013 EV07013 RNA was extracted with Trizol tRNA isolated by size selection on denaturing polyacrylamide gel range 50 150 nt. The RNA was end repaired by alkaline deacylation and T4 PNK treatment three prime adapter ligated with T4 RNA ligase 2 reverse transcribed with TGIRT. The cDNA was circularized with CircLigase and amplified with KAPA HiFi polymerase using NEB Next indexed primers.     OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC size fractionation SINGLE ILLUMINA NextSeq 500   SRP482074     EV07013.R1.fastq.gz fastq 844338040.0 6030986.0 EV07013.R1.fastq.gz 0:140 A:217780710;C:182517044;G:251974206;T:192043675;N:22405 140       217780710 182517044 251974206 192043675 22405 SRX23109807 SRS20064561 SRA1780298 Medical University of Vienna|Cell and Developmental Biology Medical University of Vienna 1 4e-05   0.0   0.99993   1.0   140   T   under 1.2% mapping rate illumina nextseq unknown size_fractionation nebnext bulk unknown unknown   Austria 2024-01-06 Gastrula Embryo Whole Organism All anatomical structures
29771 29771 SRR27437491 SRX23109806 SRS20064560 SRP482074 PRJNA1061456 tRAM seq: tRNA abundance and modification analysis during zebrafish embryo development PRJNA1061456 Other           Dome BS R3   strain:TLAB fish|breed:cross of zebrafish AB and the natural variant TL Tupfel Longfin|dev stage:5 hpf|collection date:2022|geo loc name:Austria|sex:mixed|tissue:whole embryo|treatment:BS|BioSampleModel:Model organism or animal                 tRAM seq of zebrafish: embryo 5 hpf BS rep3 EV07011 EV07011 RNA was extracted with Trizol tRNA isolated by size selection on denaturing polyacrylamide gel range 50 150 nt. The RNA was end repaired by alkaline deacylation and T4 PNK treatment three prime adapter ligated with T4 RNA ligase 2 reverse transcribed with TGIRT. The cDNA was circularized with CircLigase and amplified with KAPA HiFi polymerase using NEB Next indexed primers.     OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC size fractionation SINGLE ILLUMINA NextSeq 500   SRP482074     EV07011.R1.fastq.gz fastq 893528580.0 6382347.0 EV07011.R1.fastq.gz 0:140 A:240101890;C:155985797;G:262065322;T:235351334;N:24237 140       240101890 155985797 262065322 235351334 24237 SRX23109806 SRS20064560 SRA1780298 Medical University of Vienna|Cell and Developmental Biology Medical University of Vienna 1 0.0   0.0   1.0       140   T   under 1.2% mapping rate illumina nextseq unknown size_fractionation nebnext bulk unknown unknown   Austria 2024-01-06 Blastula Embryo Whole Organism All anatomical structures
29772 29772 SRR27437492 SRX23109805 SRS20064559 SRP482074 PRJNA1061456 tRAM seq: tRNA abundance and modification analysis during zebrafish embryo development PRJNA1061456 Other           Dome DM R3   strain:TLAB fish|breed:cross of zebrafish AB and the natural variant TL Tupfel Longfin|dev stage:5 hpf|collection date:2022|geo loc name:Austria|sex:mixed|tissue:whole embryo|treatment:DM|BioSampleModel:Model organism or animal                 tRAM seq of zebrafish: embryo 5 hpf DM rep3 EV07012 EV07012 RNA was extracted with Trizol tRNA isolated by size selection on denaturing polyacrylamide gel range 50 150 nt. The RNA was end repaired by alkaline deacylation and T4 PNK treatment three prime adapter ligated with T4 RNA ligase 2 reverse transcribed with TGIRT. The cDNA was circularized with CircLigase and amplified with KAPA HiFi polymerase using NEB Next indexed primers.     OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC size fractionation SINGLE ILLUMINA NextSeq 500   SRP482074     EV07012.R1.fastq.gz fastq 797662600.0 5697590.0 EV07012.R1.fastq.gz 0:140 A:201908589;C:182656132;G:249672167;T:163404182;N:21530 140       201908589 182656132 249672167 163404182 21530 SRX23109805 SRS20064559 SRA1780298 Medical University of Vienna|Cell and Developmental Biology Medical University of Vienna 1 3e-05   0.0   0.99991   0.75   140   T   under 1.2% mapping rate illumina nextseq unknown size_fractionation nebnext bulk unknown unknown   Austria 2024-01-06 Blastula Embryo Whole Organism All anatomical structures
29773 29773 SRR27437493 SRX23109804 SRS20064558 SRP482074 PRJNA1061456 tRAM seq: tRNA abundance and modification analysis during zebrafish embryo development PRJNA1061456 Other           Dome mock R3   strain:TLAB fish|breed:cross of zebrafish AB and the natural variant TL Tupfel Longfin|dev stage:5 hpf|collection date:2022|geo loc name:Austria|sex:mixed|tissue:whole embryo|treatment:mock|BioSampleModel:Model organism or animal                 tRAM seq of zebrafish: embryo 5 hpf mock rep3 EV07010 EV07010 RNA was extracted with Trizol tRNA isolated by size selection on denaturing polyacrylamide gel range 50 150 nt. The RNA was end repaired by alkaline deacylation and T4 PNK treatment three prime adapter ligated with T4 RNA ligase 2 reverse transcribed with TGIRT. The cDNA was circularized with CircLigase and amplified with KAPA HiFi polymerase using NEB Next indexed primers.     OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC size fractionation SINGLE ILLUMINA NextSeq 500   SRP482074     EV07010.R1.fastq.gz fastq 467593280.0 3339952.0 EV07010.R1.fastq.gz 0:140 A:122604957;C:118747514;G:124074466;T:102153374;N:12969 140       122604957 118747514 124074466 102153374 12969 SRX23109804 SRS20064558 SRA1780298 Medical University of Vienna|Cell and Developmental Biology Medical University of Vienna 1 4e-05   0.0   0.99993   1.0   140   T   under 1.2% mapping rate illumina nextseq unknown size_fractionation nebnext bulk unknown unknown   Austria 2024-01-06 Blastula Embryo Whole Organism All anatomical structures
29774 29774 SRR27437494 SRX23109803 SRS20064557 SRP482074 PRJNA1061456 tRAM seq: tRNA abundance and modification analysis during zebrafish embryo development PRJNA1061456 Other           1K cell BS R3   strain:TLAB fish|breed:cross of zebrafish AB and the natural variant TL Tupfel Longfin|dev stage:3 hpf|collection date:2022|geo loc name:Austria|sex:mixed|tissue:whole embryo|treatment:BS|BioSampleModel:Model organism or animal                 tRAM seq of zebrafish: embryo 3 hpf BS rep3 EV07008 EV07008 RNA was extracted with Trizol tRNA isolated by size selection on denaturing polyacrylamide gel range 50 150 nt. The RNA was end repaired by alkaline deacylation and T4 PNK treatment three prime adapter ligated with T4 RNA ligase 2 reverse transcribed with TGIRT. The cDNA was circularized with CircLigase and amplified with KAPA HiFi polymerase using NEB Next indexed primers.     OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC size fractionation SINGLE ILLUMINA NextSeq 500   SRP482074     EV07008.R1.fastq.gz fastq 705682040.0 5040586.0 EV07008.R1.fastq.gz 0:140 A:194506527;C:127442743;G:192893716;T:190818958;N:20096 140       194506527 127442743 192893716 190818958 20096 SRX23109803 SRS20064557 SRA1780298 Medical University of Vienna|Cell and Developmental Biology Medical University of Vienna 1 0.0   0.0   1.0       140   T   under 1.2% mapping rate illumina nextseq unknown size_fractionation nebnext bulk unknown unknown   Austria 2024-01-06 Blastula Embryo Whole Organism All anatomical structures
29775 29775 SRR27437495 SRX23109802 SRS20064556 SRP482074 PRJNA1061456 tRAM seq: tRNA abundance and modification analysis during zebrafish embryo development PRJNA1061456 Other           1K cell DM R3   strain:TLAB fish|breed:cross of zebrafish AB and the natural variant TL Tupfel Longfin|dev stage:3 hpf|collection date:2022|geo loc name:Austria|sex:mixed|tissue:whole embryo|treatment:DM|BioSampleModel:Model organism or animal                 tRAM seq of zebrafish: embryo 3 hpf DM rep3 EV07009 EV07009 RNA was extracted with Trizol tRNA isolated by size selection on denaturing polyacrylamide gel range 50 150 nt. The RNA was end repaired by alkaline deacylation and T4 PNK treatment three prime adapter ligated with T4 RNA ligase 2 reverse transcribed with TGIRT. The cDNA was circularized with CircLigase and amplified with KAPA HiFi polymerase using NEB Next indexed primers.     OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC size fractionation SINGLE ILLUMINA NextSeq 500   SRP482074     EV07009.R1.fastq.gz fastq 380716280.0 2719402.0 EV07009.R1.fastq.gz 0:140 A:95351632;C:89558330;G:115625953;T:80169603;N:10762 140       95351632 89558330 115625953 80169603 10762 SRX23109802 SRS20064556 SRA1780298 Medical University of Vienna|Cell and Developmental Biology Medical University of Vienna 1 6e-05   1e-05   0.99991   0.75   140   T   under 1.2% mapping rate illumina nextseq unknown size_fractionation nebnext bulk unknown unknown   Austria 2024-01-06 Blastula Embryo Whole Organism All anatomical structures
29776 29776 SRR27437496 SRX23109801 SRS20064555 SRP482074 PRJNA1061456 tRAM seq: tRNA abundance and modification analysis during zebrafish embryo development PRJNA1061456 Other           ovary DM R3   strain:TLAB fish|breed:cross of zebrafish AB and the natural variant TL Tupfel Longfin|dev stage:adult|collection date:2022|geo loc name:Austria|sex:female|tissue:ovary|treatment:DM|BioSampleModel:Model organism or animal                 tRAM seq of zebrafish: ovary DM rep3 EV04016 EV04016 RNA was extracted with Trizol tRNA isolated by size selection on denaturing polyacrylamide gel range 50 150 nt. The RNA was end repaired by alkaline deacylation and T4 PNK treatment three prime adapter ligated with T4 RNA ligase 2 reverse transcribed with TGIRT. The cDNA was circularized with CircLigase and amplified with KAPA HiFi polymerase using NEB Next indexed primers.     OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC size fractionation SINGLE ILLUMINA NextSeq 500   SRP482074     EV04016.R1.fastq.gz fastq 635752880.0 4541092.0 EV04016.R1.fastq.gz 0:140 A:160072248;C:143996869;G:189137330;T:142516059;N:30374 140       160072248 143996869 189137330 142516059 30374 SRX23109801 SRS20064555 SRA1780298 Medical University of Vienna|Cell and Developmental Biology Medical University of Vienna 1 1e-05   0.0   0.99997   1.0   140   T   under 1.2% mapping rate illumina nextseq unknown size_fractionation nebnext bulk unknown unknown   Austria 2024-01-06 Adult Adult Gonad Reproductive System
29777 29777 SRR27437497 SRX23109800 SRS20064554 SRP482074 PRJNA1061456 tRAM seq: tRNA abundance and modification analysis during zebrafish embryo development PRJNA1061456 Other           ovary mock R3   strain:TLAB fish|breed:cross of zebrafish AB and the natural variant TL Tupfel Longfin|dev stage:adult|collection date:2022|geo loc name:Austria|sex:female|tissue:ovary|treatment:mock|BioSampleModel:Model organism or animal                 tRAM seq of zebrafish: ovary mock rep3 EV04015 EV04015 RNA was extracted with Trizol tRNA isolated by size selection on denaturing polyacrylamide gel range 50 150 nt. The RNA was end repaired by alkaline deacylation and T4 PNK treatment three prime adapter ligated with T4 RNA ligase 2 reverse transcribed with TGIRT. The cDNA was circularized with CircLigase and amplified with KAPA HiFi polymerase using NEB Next indexed primers.     OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC size fractionation SINGLE ILLUMINA NextSeq 500   SRP482074     EV04015.R1.fastq.gz fastq 489700680.0 3497862.0 EV04015.R1.fastq.gz 0:140 A:126641754;C:126582886;G:130564204;T:105889815;N:22021 140       126641754 126582886 130564204 105889815 22021 SRX23109800 SRS20064554 SRA1780298 Medical University of Vienna|Cell and Developmental Biology Medical University of Vienna 1 6e-05   0.0   0.99983   0.55555   140   T   under 1.2% mapping rate illumina nextseq unknown size_fractionation nebnext bulk unknown unknown   Austria 2024-01-06 Adult Adult Gonad Reproductive System
29778 29778 SRR27435863 SRX23108233 SRS20063070 SRP482074 PRJNA1061456 tRAM seq: tRNA abundance and modification analysis during zebrafish embryo development PRJNA1061456 Other           1K cell mock R4   strain:TLAB fish|isolate:NA|breed:cross of zebrafish AB and the natural variant TL Tupfel Longfin|cultivar:NA|ecotype:NA|dev stage:3 hpf|collection date:2022|geo loc name:Austria|sex:mixed|tissue:whole embryo|treatment:mock|BioSampleModel:Model organism or animal                 tRAM seq of zebrafish: embryo 3 hpf mock rep4 EV08010 EV08010 RNA was extracted with Trizol tRNA isolated by size selection on denaturing polyacrylamide gel range 50 150 nt. The RNA was end repaired by alkaline deacylation and T4 PNK treatment three prime adapter ligated with T4 RNA ligase 2 reverse transcribed with TGIRT. The cDNA was circularized with CircLigase and amplified with KAPA HiFi polymerase using NEB Next indexed primers.     OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC size fractionation SINGLE ILLUMINA NextSeq 500   SRP482074     EV08010.R1.fastq.gz fastq 678729520.0 4848068.0 EV08010.R1.fastq.gz 0:140 A:170672553;C:182320916;G:171865707;T:153824163;N:46181 140       170672553 182320916 171865707 153824163 46181 SRX23108233 SRS20063070 SRA1780265 Medical University of Vienna|Cell and Developmental Biology Medical University of Vienna 1 0.0006   4e-05   0.99878   0.79069   140   T   under 1.2% mapping rate illumina nextseq unknown size_fractionation nebnext bulk unknown unknown   Austria 2024-01-05 Blastula Embryo Whole Organism All anatomical structures
29779 29779 SRR27435864 SRX23108232 SRS20063068 SRP482074 PRJNA1061456 tRAM seq: tRNA abundance and modification analysis during zebrafish embryo development PRJNA1061456 Other           4 cell BS R4   strain:TLAB fish|isolate:NA|breed:cross of zebrafish AB and the natural variant TL Tupfel Longfin|cultivar:NA|ecotype:NA|dev stage:1 hpf|collection date:2022|geo loc name:Austria|sex:mixed|tissue:whole embryo|treatment:BS|BioSampleModel:Model organism or animal                 tRAM seq of zebrafish: embryo 1 hpf BS rep4 EV08009 EV08009 RNA was extracted with Trizol tRNA isolated by size selection on denaturing polyacrylamide gel range 50 150 nt. The RNA was end repaired by alkaline deacylation and T4 PNK treatment three prime adapter ligated with T4 RNA ligase 2 reverse transcribed with TGIRT. The cDNA was circularized with CircLigase and amplified with KAPA HiFi polymerase using NEB Next indexed primers.     OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC size fractionation SINGLE ILLUMINA NextSeq 500   SRP482074     EV08009.R1.fastq.gz fastq 756964460.0 5406889.0 EV08009.R1.fastq.gz 0:140 A:191381054;C:111783194;G:185694475;T:268052883;N:52854 140       191381054 111783194 185694475 268052883 52854 SRX23108232 SRS20063068 SRA1780265 Medical University of Vienna|Cell and Developmental Biology Medical University of Vienna 1 1e-05   0.0   0.99997   1.0   140   T   under 1.2% mapping rate illumina nextseq unknown size_fractionation nebnext bulk unknown unknown   Austria 2024-01-05 Cleavage Embryo Whole Organism All anatomical structures
29780 29780 SRR27435865 SRX23108231 SRS20063069 SRP482074 PRJNA1061456 tRAM seq: tRNA abundance and modification analysis during zebrafish embryo development PRJNA1061456 Other           4 cell DM R4   strain:TLAB fish|isolate:NA|breed:cross of zebrafish AB and the natural variant TL Tupfel Longfin|cultivar:NA|ecotype:NA|dev stage:1 hpf|collection date:2022|geo loc name:Austria|sex:mixed|tissue:whole embryo|treatment:DM|BioSampleModel:Model organism or animal                 tRAM seq of zebrafish: embryo 1 hpf DM rep4 EV08008 EV08008 RNA was extracted with Trizol tRNA isolated by size selection on denaturing polyacrylamide gel range 50 150 nt. The RNA was end repaired by alkaline deacylation and T4 PNK treatment three prime adapter ligated with T4 RNA ligase 2 reverse transcribed with TGIRT. The cDNA was circularized with CircLigase and amplified with KAPA HiFi polymerase using NEB Next indexed primers.     OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC size fractionation SINGLE ILLUMINA NextSeq 500   SRP482074     EV08008.R1.fastq.gz fastq 751794680.0 5369962.0 EV08008.R1.fastq.gz 0:140 A:194845808;C:197389162;G:194749636;T:164756481;N:53593 140       194845808 197389162 194749636 164756481 53593 SRX23108231 SRS20063069 SRA1780265 Medical University of Vienna|Cell and Developmental Biology Medical University of Vienna 1 0.00124   0.00029   0.99853   0.77083   140   T   under 1.2% mapping rate illumina nextseq unknown size_fractionation nebnext bulk unknown unknown   Austria 2024-01-05 Cleavage Embryo Whole Organism All anatomical structures
29781 29781 SRR27435866 SRX23108230 SRS20063066 SRP482074 PRJNA1061456 tRAM seq: tRNA abundance and modification analysis during zebrafish embryo development PRJNA1061456 Other           4 cell mock R4   strain:TLAB fish|isolate:NA|breed:cross of zebrafish AB and the natural variant TL Tupfel Longfin|cultivar:NA|ecotype:NA|dev stage:1 hpf|collection date:2022|geo loc name:Austria|sex:mixed|tissue:whole embryo|treatment:mock|BioSampleModel:Model organism or animal                 tRAM seq of zebrafish: embryo 1 hpf mock rep4 EV08007 EV08007 RNA was extracted with Trizol tRNA isolated by size selection on denaturing polyacrylamide gel range 50 150 nt. The RNA was end repaired by alkaline deacylation and T4 PNK treatment three prime adapter ligated with T4 RNA ligase 2 reverse transcribed with TGIRT. The cDNA was circularized with CircLigase and amplified with KAPA HiFi polymerase using NEB Next indexed primers.     OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC size fractionation SINGLE ILLUMINA NextSeq 500   SRP482074     EV08007.R1.fastq.gz fastq 761961760.0 5442584.0 EV08007.R1.fastq.gz 0:140 A:194053323;C:191169414;G:194452160;T:182234253;N:52610 140       194053323 191169414 194452160 182234253 52610 SRX23108230 SRS20063066 SRA1780265 Medical University of Vienna|Cell and Developmental Biology Medical University of Vienna 1 0.00242   0.00062   0.99803   0.81818   140   T   under 1.2% mapping rate illumina nextseq unknown size_fractionation nebnext bulk unknown unknown   Austria 2024-01-05 Cleavage Embryo Whole Organism All anatomical structures
29782 29782 SRR27435867 SRX23108229 SRS20063067 SRP482074 PRJNA1061456 tRAM seq: tRNA abundance and modification analysis during zebrafish embryo development PRJNA1061456 Other           eggs BS R4   strain:TLAB fish|isolate:NA|breed:cross of zebrafish AB and the natural variant TL Tupfel Longfin|cultivar:NA|ecotype:NA|dev stage:activated eggs|collection date:2022|geo loc name:Austria|sex:mixed|tissue:activated eggs|treatment:BS|BioSampleModel:Model organism or animal                 tRAM seq of zebrafish: eggs BS rep4 EV08006 EV08006 RNA was extracted with Trizol tRNA isolated by size selection on denaturing polyacrylamide gel range 50 150 nt. The RNA was end repaired by alkaline deacylation and T4 PNK treatment three prime adapter ligated with T4 RNA ligase 2 reverse transcribed with TGIRT. The cDNA was circularized with CircLigase and amplified with KAPA HiFi polymerase using NEB Next indexed primers.     OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC size fractionation SINGLE ILLUMINA NextSeq 500   SRP482074     EV08006.R1.fastq.gz fastq 501745580.0 3583897.0 EV08006.R1.fastq.gz 0:140 A:124242793;C:76040623;G:131428076;T:170000220;N:33868 140       124242793 76040623 131428076 170000220 33868 SRX23108229 SRS20063067 SRA1780265 Medical University of Vienna|Cell and Developmental Biology Medical University of Vienna 1 4e-05   0.0   0.99993   0.66666   140   T   under 1.2% mapping rate illumina nextseq unknown size_fractionation nebnext bulk unknown unknown   Austria 2024-01-05 Undetermined Embryo Undetermined Embryo Imprecise
29783 29783 SRR27435868 SRX23108228 SRS20063063 SRP482074 PRJNA1061456 tRAM seq: tRNA abundance and modification analysis during zebrafish embryo development PRJNA1061456 Other           eggs DM R4   strain:TLAB fish|isolate:NA|breed:cross of zebrafish AB and the natural variant TL Tupfel Longfin|cultivar:NA|ecotype:NA|dev stage:activated eggs|collection date:2022|geo loc name:Austria|sex:mixed|tissue:activated eggs|treatment:DM|BioSampleModel:Model organism or animal                 tRAM seq of zebrafish: eggs DM rep4 EV08005 EV08005 RNA was extracted with Trizol tRNA isolated by size selection on denaturing polyacrylamide gel range 50 150 nt. The RNA was end repaired by alkaline deacylation and T4 PNK treatment three prime adapter ligated with T4 RNA ligase 2 reverse transcribed with TGIRT. The cDNA was circularized with CircLigase and amplified with KAPA HiFi polymerase using NEB Next indexed primers.     OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC size fractionation SINGLE ILLUMINA NextSeq 500   SRP482074     EV08005.R1.fastq.gz fastq 740147520.0 5286768.0 EV08005.R1.fastq.gz 0:140 A:192131338;C:198130943;G:182616631;T:167216834;N:51774 140       192131338 198130943 182616631 167216834 51774 SRX23108228 SRS20063063 SRA1780265 Medical University of Vienna|Cell and Developmental Biology Medical University of Vienna 1 0.00052   8e-05   0.99922   0.92537   140   T   under 1.2% mapping rate illumina nextseq unknown size_fractionation nebnext bulk unknown unknown   Austria 2024-01-05 Undetermined Embryo Undetermined Embryo Imprecise
29784 29784 SRR27435869 SRX23108227 SRS20063065 SRP482074 PRJNA1061456 tRAM seq: tRNA abundance and modification analysis during zebrafish embryo development PRJNA1061456 Other           eggs mock R4   strain:TLAB fish|isolate:NA|breed:cross of zebrafish AB and the natural variant TL Tupfel Longfin|cultivar:NA|ecotype:NA|dev stage:activated eggs|collection date:2022|geo loc name:Austria|sex:mixed|tissue:activated eggs|treatment:mock|BioSampleModel:Model organism or animal                 tRAM seq of zebrafish: eggs mock rep4 EV08004 EV08004 RNA was extracted with Trizol tRNA isolated by size selection on denaturing polyacrylamide gel range 50 150 nt. The RNA was end repaired by alkaline deacylation and T4 PNK treatment three prime adapter ligated with T4 RNA ligase 2 reverse transcribed with TGIRT. The cDNA was circularized with CircLigase and amplified with KAPA HiFi polymerase using NEB Next indexed primers.     OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC size fractionation SINGLE ILLUMINA NextSeq 500   SRP482074     EV08004.R1.fastq.gz fastq 761663140.0 5440451.0 EV08004.R1.fastq.gz 0:140 A:194684966;C:192212418;G:196372829;T:178340184;N:52743 140       194684966 192212418 196372829 178340184 52743 SRX23108227 SRS20063065 SRA1780265 Medical University of Vienna|Cell and Developmental Biology Medical University of Vienna 1 0.00151   0.00037   0.99884   0.82352   140   T   under 1.2% mapping rate illumina nextseq unknown size_fractionation nebnext bulk unknown unknown   Austria 2024-01-05 Undetermined Embryo Undetermined Embryo Imprecise
29785 29785 SRR27435870 SRX23108226 SRS20063064 SRP482074 PRJNA1061456 tRAM seq: tRNA abundance and modification analysis during zebrafish embryo development PRJNA1061456 Other           24h BS R4   strain:TLAB fish|isolate:NA|breed:cross of zebrafish AB and the natural variant TL Tupfel Longfin|cultivar:NA|ecotype:NA|dev stage:24 hpf|collection date:2022|geo loc name:Austria|sex:mixed|tissue:whole embryo|treatment:BS|BioSampleModel:Model organism or animal                 tRAM seq of zebrafish: embryo 24 hpf BS rep4 EV08021 EV08021 RNA was extracted with Trizol tRNA isolated by size selection on denaturing polyacrylamide gel range 50 150 nt. The RNA was end repaired by alkaline deacylation and T4 PNK treatment three prime adapter ligated with T4 RNA ligase 2 reverse transcribed with TGIRT. The cDNA was circularized with CircLigase and amplified with KAPA HiFi polymerase using NEB Next indexed primers.     OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC size fractionation SINGLE ILLUMINA NextSeq 500   SRP482074     EV08021.R1.fastq.gz fastq 747571860.0 5339799.0 EV08021.R1.fastq.gz 0:140 A:185666613;C:121868156;G:181153824;T:258830310;N:52957 140       185666613 121868156 181153824 258830310 52957 SRX23108226 SRS20063064 SRA1780265 Medical University of Vienna|Cell and Developmental Biology Medical University of Vienna 1 0.0   0.0   1.0       140   T   under 1.2% mapping rate illumina nextseq unknown size_fractionation nebnext bulk unknown unknown   Austria 2024-01-05 Pharyngula Embryo Whole Organism All anatomical structures
29786 29786 SRR27435871 SRX23108225 SRS20063062 SRP482074 PRJNA1061456 tRAM seq: tRNA abundance and modification analysis during zebrafish embryo development PRJNA1061456 Other           ovary BS R4   strain:TLAB fish|isolate:NA|breed:cross of zebrafish AB and the natural variant TL Tupfel Longfin|cultivar:NA|ecotype:NA|dev stage:adult|collection date:2022|geo loc name:Austria|sex:female|tissue:ovary|treatment:BS|BioSampleModel:Model organism or animal                 tRAM seq of zebrafish: ovary BS rep4 EV08003 EV08003 RNA was extracted with Trizol tRNA isolated by size selection on denaturing polyacrylamide gel range 50 150 nt. The RNA was end repaired by alkaline deacylation and T4 PNK treatment three prime adapter ligated with T4 RNA ligase 2 reverse transcribed with TGIRT. The cDNA was circularized with CircLigase and amplified with KAPA HiFi polymerase using NEB Next indexed primers.     OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC size fractionation SINGLE ILLUMINA NextSeq 500   SRP482074     EV08003.R1.fastq.gz fastq 571689580.0 4083497.0 EV08003.R1.fastq.gz 0:140 A:141414131;C:88722455;G:138790445;T:202723075;N:39474 140       141414131 88722455 138790445 202723075 39474 SRX23108225 SRS20063062 SRA1780265 Medical University of Vienna|Cell and Developmental Biology Medical University of Vienna 1 3e-05   0.0   0.99991   0.75   140   T   under 1.2% mapping rate illumina nextseq unknown size_fractionation nebnext bulk unknown unknown   Austria 2024-01-05 Adult Adult Gonad Reproductive System
29787 29787 SRR27435872 SRX23108224 SRS20063061 SRP482074 PRJNA1061456 tRAM seq: tRNA abundance and modification analysis during zebrafish embryo development PRJNA1061456 Other           24h DM R4   strain:TLAB fish|isolate:NA|breed:cross of zebrafish AB and the natural variant TL Tupfel Longfin|cultivar:NA|ecotype:NA|dev stage:24 hpf|collection date:2022|geo loc name:Austria|sex:mixed|tissue:whole embryo|treatment:DM|BioSampleModel:Model organism or animal                 tRAM seq of zebrafish: embryo 24 hpf DM rep4 EV08020 EV08020 RNA was extracted with Trizol tRNA isolated by size selection on denaturing polyacrylamide gel range 50 150 nt. The RNA was end repaired by alkaline deacylation and T4 PNK treatment three prime adapter ligated with T4 RNA ligase 2 reverse transcribed with TGIRT. The cDNA was circularized with CircLigase and amplified with KAPA HiFi polymerase using NEB Next indexed primers.     OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC size fractionation SINGLE ILLUMINA NextSeq 500   SRP482074     EV08020.R1.fastq.gz fastq 775090400.0 5536360.0 EV08020.R1.fastq.gz 0:140 A:198131068;C:205114604;G:198783890;T:173006366;N:54472 140       198131068 205114604 198783890 173006366 54472 SRX23108224 SRS20063061 SRA1780265 Medical University of Vienna|Cell and Developmental Biology Medical University of Vienna 1 0.00056   4e-05   0.9989   0.71052   140   T   under 1.2% mapping rate illumina nextseq unknown size_fractionation nebnext bulk unknown unknown   Austria 2024-01-05 Pharyngula Embryo Whole Organism All anatomical structures
29788 29788 SRR27435873 SRX23108223 SRS20063060 SRP482074 PRJNA1061456 tRAM seq: tRNA abundance and modification analysis during zebrafish embryo development PRJNA1061456 Other           24h mock R4   strain:TLAB fish|isolate:NA|breed:cross of zebrafish AB and the natural variant TL Tupfel Longfin|cultivar:NA|ecotype:NA|dev stage:24 hpf|collection date:2022|geo loc name:Austria|sex:mixed|tissue:whole embryo|treatment:mock|BioSampleModel:Model organism or animal                 tRAM seq of zebrafish: embryo 24 hpf mock rep4 EV08019 EV08019 RNA was extracted with Trizol tRNA isolated by size selection on denaturing polyacrylamide gel range 50 150 nt. The RNA was end repaired by alkaline deacylation and T4 PNK treatment three prime adapter ligated with T4 RNA ligase 2 reverse transcribed with TGIRT. The cDNA was circularized with CircLigase and amplified with KAPA HiFi polymerase using NEB Next indexed primers.     OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC size fractionation SINGLE ILLUMINA NextSeq 500   SRP482074     EV08019.R1.fastq.gz fastq 763233240.0 5451666.0 EV08019.R1.fastq.gz 0:140 A:189362337;C:199268270;G:198509945;T:176040551;N:52137 140       189362337 199268270 198509945 176040551 52137 SRX23108223 SRS20063060 SRA1780265 Medical University of Vienna|Cell and Developmental Biology Medical University of Vienna 1 0.00036   6e-05   0.99939   0.85365   140   T   under 1.2% mapping rate illumina nextseq unknown size_fractionation nebnext bulk unknown unknown   Austria 2024-01-05 Pharyngula Embryo Whole Organism All anatomical structures
29789 29789 SRR27435874 SRX23108222 SRS20063057 SRP482074 PRJNA1061456 tRAM seq: tRNA abundance and modification analysis during zebrafish embryo development PRJNA1061456 Other           Bud BS R4   strain:TLAB fish|isolate:NA|breed:cross of zebrafish AB and the natural variant TL Tupfel Longfin|cultivar:NA|ecotype:NA|dev stage:10 hpf|collection date:2022|geo loc name:Austria|sex:mixed|tissue:whole embryo|treatment:BS|BioSampleModel:Model organism or animal                 tRAM seq of zebrafish: embryo 10 hpf BS rep4 EV08018 EV08018 RNA was extracted with Trizol tRNA isolated by size selection on denaturing polyacrylamide gel range 50 150 nt. The RNA was end repaired by alkaline deacylation and T4 PNK treatment three prime adapter ligated with T4 RNA ligase 2 reverse transcribed with TGIRT. The cDNA was circularized with CircLigase and amplified with KAPA HiFi polymerase using NEB Next indexed primers.     OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC size fractionation SINGLE ILLUMINA NextSeq 500   SRP482074     EV08018.R1.fastq.gz fastq 809203080.0 5780022.0 EV08018.R1.fastq.gz 0:140 A:209714496;C:130623600;G:197912909;T:270895413;N:56662 140       209714496 130623600 197912909 270895413 56662 SRX23108222 SRS20063057 SRA1780265 Medical University of Vienna|Cell and Developmental Biology Medical University of Vienna 1 0.0   0.0   1.0       140   T   under 1.2% mapping rate illumina nextseq unknown size_fractionation nebnext bulk unknown unknown   Austria 2024-01-05 Gastrula Embryo Whole Organism All anatomical structures
29790 29790 SRR27435875 SRX23108221 SRS20063059 SRP482074 PRJNA1061456 tRAM seq: tRNA abundance and modification analysis during zebrafish embryo development PRJNA1061456 Other           Bud DM R4   strain:TLAB fish|isolate:NA|breed:cross of zebrafish AB and the natural variant TL Tupfel Longfin|cultivar:NA|ecotype:NA|dev stage:10 hpf|collection date:2022|geo loc name:Austria|sex:mixed|tissue:whole embryo|treatment:DM|BioSampleModel:Model organism or animal                 tRAM seq of zebrafish: embryo 10 hpf DM rep4 EV08017 EV08017 RNA was extracted with Trizol tRNA isolated by size selection on denaturing polyacrylamide gel range 50 150 nt. The RNA was end repaired by alkaline deacylation and T4 PNK treatment three prime adapter ligated with T4 RNA ligase 2 reverse transcribed with TGIRT. The cDNA was circularized with CircLigase and amplified with KAPA HiFi polymerase using NEB Next indexed primers.     OTHER TRANSCRIPTOMIC size fractionation SINGLE ILLUMINA NextSeq 500   SRP482074     EV08017.R1.fastq.gz fastq 722137500.0 5158125.0 EV08017.R1.fastq.gz 0:140 A:176408094;C:195907583;G:188487109;T:161283055;N:51659 140       176408094 195907583 188487109 161283055 51659 SRX23108221 SRS20063059 SRA1780265 Medical University of Vienna|Cell and Developmental Biology Medical University of Vienna 1 0.00053   3e-05   0.999   0.70422   140   T   under 1.2% mapping rate illumina nextseq unknown size_fractionation nebnext bulk unknown unknown   Austria 2024-01-05 Gastrula Embryo Whole Organism All anatomical structures

Next page

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE run_metadata("run.accession" VARCHAR, "experiment.accession" VARCHAR, "sample.accession" VARCHAR, "study.accession" VARCHAR, bioproject VARCHAR, "study.title" VARCHAR, "study.alias" VARCHAR, "study.type" VARCHAR, "study.abstract" VARCHAR, "study.attributes" VARCHAR, "study.PMIDs" VARCHAR, "sample.description" VARCHAR, "sample.title" VARCHAR, "sample.alias" VARCHAR, "sample.centername" VARCHAR, "sample.attributes" VARCHAR, "GEOsample.title" VARCHAR, "GEOsample.dataprocessing" VARCHAR, "GEOsample.source" VARCHAR, "GEOsample.treatmentprotocol" VARCHAR, "GEOsample.extractprotocol" VARCHAR, "GEOsample.growthprotocol" VARCHAR, "GEOsample.characteristics" VARCHAR, "GEOsample.accession" VARCHAR, "experiment.title" VARCHAR, "experiment.alias" VARCHAR, "experiment.library_name" VARCHAR, "experiment.design_description" VARCHAR, "experiment.library_construction_protocol" VARCHAR, "experiment.attributes" VARCHAR, "experiment.library_strategy" VARCHAR, "experiment.library_source" VARCHAR, "experiment.library_selection" VARCHAR, "experiment.library_layout" VARCHAR, "experiment.platform" VARCHAR, "experiment.instrument_model" VARCHAR, "experiment.spot_descriptor" VARCHAR, "experiment.study_ref" VARCHAR, "run.title" VARCHAR, "run.attributes" VARCHAR, "run.filename" VARCHAR, "run.semantic_name" VARCHAR, "run.total_bases" DOUBLE, "run.total_spots" DOUBLE, "run.alias" VARCHAR, "run.read_lengths" VARCHAR, "run.base_counts" VARCHAR, "run.r1_length" BIGINT, "run.r2_length" BIGINT, "run.r3_length" BIGINT, "run.r4_length" BIGINT, "run.Acount" BIGINT, "run.Ccount" BIGINT, "run.Gcount" BIGINT, "run.Tcount" BIGINT, "run.Ncount" BIGINT, "run.experiment" VARCHAR, "run.pool_member" VARCHAR, "submission.accession" VARCHAR, "submission.srasource" VARCHAR, "submission.bioprojectsource" VARCHAR, "seqdetective.n_mates" BIGINT, "seqdetective.mapping_rate.mate1" DOUBLE, "seqdetective.mapping_rate.mate2" DOUBLE, "seqdetective.nofeature_rate.mate1" DOUBLE, "seqdetective.nofeature_rate.mate2" DOUBLE, "seqdetective.sparsity.mate1" DOUBLE, "seqdetective.sparsity.mate2" DOUBLE, "seqdetective.pos_strand_rate.mate1" DOUBLE, "seqdetective.pos_strand_rate.mate2" DOUBLE, "seqdetective.readlen.mate1" BIGINT, "seqdetective.readlen.mate2" BIGINT, "seqdetective.judgement.mate1" VARCHAR, "seqdetective.judgement.mate2" VARCHAR, "seqdetective.judgement.reason" VARCHAR, platform_family VARCHAR, instrument_generation VARCHAR, read_bias VARCHAR, selection_class VARCHAR, prep_kit VARCHAR, sc_or_bulk VARCHAR, tech_class VARCHAR, technology VARCHAR, tech_variant VARCHAR, "submission.bioprojectsource.country" VARCHAR, earliest_date DATE, devstage_curation VARCHAR, devstage_curation_coarse VARCHAR, tissue_curation VARCHAR, tissue_curation_coarse VARCHAR);;
CREATE INDEX idx_run_bioproject ON run_metadata(bioproject);;
CREATE INDEX idx_run_run_accession ON run_metadata("run.accession");;