{"database": "metadata", "table": "run_metadata", "is_view": false, "human_description_en": "where experiment.library_layout = \"PAIRED\", experiment.library_selection = \"other\" and tissue_curation_coarse = \"All anatomical structures\"", "rows": [[7946, "ERR015563", "ERX005934", "ERS012707", "ERP000263", "PRJEB2208", "Zebrafish gene three prime end pull down for genome annotation", "E-MTAB-308", "Transcriptome Analysis", null, null, null, null, "E MTAB 308:Zebrafish embryo 2 dpf 2", "SAMEA898403", "Wellcome Sanger Institute", "Age:2 days|Alias:E MTAB 308:Zebrafish embryo 2 dpf 2|Broker name:ArrayExpress|Description:Protocols: Zebrafish embyos or tissues were collected from a Tuebingen strain incross and grown at 28 C. Collected samples were snap frozen on dry ice and stored at  70 C Total RNA was extracted using Trizol Reagent Invitrogen following the manufacturer's instructions. Pellets were resuspended RNase free 10 mM Tris pH 7.5 and the RNA was quantified using a NanoDrop ND 1000 Spectrophotometer Axon Instruments.|DevelopmentalStage:embryo|INSDC center alias:SC|INSDC center name:Wellcome Sanger Institute|INSDC first public:2010 08 19T15:57:35Z|INSDC last update:2018 03 08T15:25:04Z|INSDC status:public|InitialTimePoint:fertilization|OrganismPart:whole organism|SRA accession:ERS012707|Sample Name:ERS012707|Sex:unknown sex|StrainOrLine:Tuebingen|Title:Danio rerio", null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, "Illumina Genome Analyzer II paired end sequencing; Zebrafish gene 3 prime end pull down for genome annotation", "E MTAB 308:Illumina Genome Analyzer II sequencing of Zebrafish embryo 2 dpf three prime pull down paired end 250 to 300 bp insert", "Zebrafish embro 2 dpf mRNA three prime end", "Zebrafish gene three prime end pull down for genome annotation", "20 ug of total RNA was fragmented using RNA Fragmentation Reagent Ambion for 5 minutes at 70 C and ethanol precipitated with glycogen and LiCl.   RNA was annealed to the oligo stBPM1polyT22 biotin GGCCAGTCCTGGAGTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTVN and bound to streptavidin  magnetic beads.   post washing by pull down on a magnet  the bound RNA was reverse transcribed with SuperScript II Invitrogen and a second strand synthesised with DNA polymerase I Promega and RNase H NEB.   post further washing  the double strand cDNA was released from the beads with BpmI NEB.   The cDNA was recovered with the QIAgen PCR Purification Kit and made into a standard Illumina library following the manufacturer's protocol with a fragment size of 250 to 300 bp.", "Experimental Factor: AGE:2 d|Experimental Factor: DEVELOPMENTAL STAGE:embryo|Experimental Factor: ORGANISM PART:whole organism|Experimental Factor: SEX:unknown sex", "RNA-Seq", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "Illumina Genome Analyzer II", null, "ERP000263", "Illumina Genome Analyzer II paired end sequencing; Zebrafish gene three prime end pull down for genome annotation", "ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2010 08 19|ENA LAST UPDATE:2018 11 16", "3444_2.srf", "srf", 990308120.0, 6515185.0, "E MTAB 308:Illumina Genome Analyzer II sequencing of Zebrafish embryo 2 dpf three prime pull down paired end 250 to 300 bp insert", "0:76 1:76", "A:279665076;C:200433201;G:189692111;T:304366697;N:16151035", 76, 76, null, null, 279665076, 200433201, 189692111, 304366697, 16151035, "ERX005934", "ERS012707", "ERA010603", "SC|Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute", "SC|Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute", 2, 0.93964, 0.94008, 0.40095, 0.39969, 0.74424, 0.74915, 0.49535, 0.49761, 76, 76, "B", "B", "biological fallback assumption", "illumina", "early_illumina", "3prime", "other", "unknown", "bulk", "unknown", "unknown", null, "United Kingdom", "2010-08-19", "Hatching", "Embryo", "Whole Organism", "All anatomical structures"], [7947, "ERR015564", "ERX005933", "ERS012706", "ERP000263", "PRJEB2208", "Zebrafish gene three prime end pull down for genome annotation", "E-MTAB-308", "Transcriptome Analysis", null, null, null, null, "E MTAB 308:Zebrafish embryo 3 dpf 2", "SAMEA898404", "Wellcome Sanger Institute", "Age:3 days|Alias:E MTAB 308:Zebrafish embryo 3 dpf 2|Broker name:ArrayExpress|Description:Protocols: Zebrafish embyos or tissues were collected from a Tuebingen strain incross and grown at 28 C. Collected samples were snap frozen on dry ice and stored at  70 C Total RNA was extracted using Trizol Reagent Invitrogen following the manufacturer's instructions. Pellets were resuspended RNase free 10 mM Tris pH 7.5 and the RNA was quantified using a NanoDrop ND 1000 Spectrophotometer Axon Instruments.|DevelopmentalStage:embryo|INSDC center alias:SC|INSDC center name:Wellcome Sanger Institute|INSDC first public:2010 08 19T15:57:35Z|INSDC last update:2018 03 08T15:25:04Z|INSDC status:public|InitialTimePoint:fertilization|OrganismPart:whole organism|SRA accession:ERS012706|Sample Name:ERS012706|Sex:unknown sex|StrainOrLine:Tuebingen|Title:Danio rerio", null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, "Illumina Genome Analyzer II paired end sequencing; Zebrafish gene 3 prime end pull down for genome annotation", "E MTAB 308:Illumina Genome Analyzer II sequencing of Zebrafish embryo 3 dpf three prime pull down paired end 250 to 300 bp insert", "Zebrafish embro 3 dpf mRNA three prime end", "Zebrafish gene three prime end pull down for genome annotation", "20 ug of total RNA was fragmented using RNA Fragmentation Reagent Ambion for 5 minutes at 70 C and ethanol precipitated with glycogen and LiCl.   RNA was annealed to the oligo stBPM1polyT22 biotin GGCCAGTCCTGGAGTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTVN and bound to streptavidin  magnetic beads.   post washing by pull down on a magnet  the bound RNA was reverse transcribed with SuperScript II Invitrogen and a second strand synthesised with DNA polymerase I Promega and RNase H NEB.   post further washing  the double strand cDNA was released from the beads with BpmI NEB.   The cDNA was recovered with the QIAgen PCR Purification Kit and made into a standard Illumina library following the manufacturer's protocol with a fragment size of 250 to 300 bp.", "Experimental Factor: AGE:3 d|Experimental Factor: DEVELOPMENTAL STAGE:embryo|Experimental Factor: ORGANISM PART:whole organism|Experimental Factor: SEX:unknown sex", "RNA-Seq", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "Illumina Genome Analyzer II", null, "ERP000263", "Illumina Genome Analyzer II paired end sequencing; Zebrafish gene three prime end pull down for genome annotation", "ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2010 08 19|ENA LAST UPDATE:2018 11 16", "3444_3.srf", "srf", 1572215648.0, 10343524.0, "E MTAB 308:Illumina Genome Analyzer II sequencing of Zebrafish embryo 3 dpf three prime pull down paired end 250 to 300 bp insert", "0:76 1:76", "A:395189954;C:374281517;G:356666372;T:420372888;N:25704917", 76, 76, null, null, 395189954, 374281517, 356666372, 420372888, 25704917, "ERX005933", "ERS012706", "ERA010603", "SC|Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute", "SC|Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute", 2, 0.96337, 0.96626, 0.12558, 0.12974, 0.7824, 0.79086, 0.40731, 0.41802, 76, 76, "B", "B", "biological fallback assumption", "illumina", "early_illumina", "3prime", "other", "unknown", "bulk", "unknown", "unknown", null, "United Kingdom", "2010-08-19", "Larval", "Larval", "Whole Organism", "All anatomical structures"], [7948, "ERR015562", "ERX005932", "ERS012705", "ERP000263", "PRJEB2208", "Zebrafish gene three prime end pull down for genome annotation", "E-MTAB-308", "Transcriptome Analysis", null, null, null, null, "E MTAB 308:Zebrafish embryo 1 dpf 2", "SAMEA898401", "Wellcome Sanger Institute", "Age:1 days|Alias:E MTAB 308:Zebrafish embryo 1 dpf 2|Broker name:ArrayExpress|Description:Protocols: Zebrafish embyos or tissues were collected from a Tuebingen strain incross and grown at 28 C. Collected samples were snap frozen on dry ice and stored at  70 C Total RNA was extracted using Trizol Reagent Invitrogen following the manufacturer's instructions. Pellets were resuspended RNase free 10 mM Tris pH 7.5 and the RNA was quantified using a NanoDrop ND 1000 Spectrophotometer Axon Instruments.|DevelopmentalStage:embryo|INSDC center alias:SC|INSDC center name:Wellcome Sanger Institute|INSDC first public:2010 08 19T15:57:35Z|INSDC last update:2018 03 08T15:25:04Z|INSDC status:public|InitialTimePoint:fertilization|OrganismPart:whole organism|SRA accession:ERS012705|Sample Name:ERS012705|Sex:unknown sex|StrainOrLine:Tuebingen|Title:Danio rerio", null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, "Illumina Genome Analyzer II paired end sequencing; Zebrafish gene 3 prime end pull down for genome annotation", "E MTAB 308:Illumina Genome Analyzer II sequencing of Zebrafish embryo 1 dpf three prime pull down paired end 250 to 300 bp insert", "Zebrafish embro 1 dpf mRNA three prime end", "Zebrafish gene three prime end pull down for genome annotation", "20 ug of total RNA was fragmented using RNA Fragmentation Reagent Ambion for 5 minutes at 70 C and ethanol precipitated with glycogen and LiCl.   RNA was annealed to the oligo stBPM1polyT22 biotin GGCCAGTCCTGGAGTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTVN and bound to streptavidin  magnetic beads.   post washing by pull down on a magnet  the bound RNA was reverse transcribed with SuperScript II Invitrogen and a second strand synthesised with DNA polymerase I Promega and RNase H NEB.   post further washing  the double strand cDNA was released from the beads with BpmI NEB.   The cDNA was recovered with the QIAgen PCR Purification Kit and made into a standard Illumina library following the manufacturer's protocol with a fragment size of 250 to 300 bp.", "Experimental Factor: AGE:1 d|Experimental Factor: DEVELOPMENTAL STAGE:embryo|Experimental Factor: ORGANISM PART:whole organism|Experimental Factor: SEX:unknown sex", "RNA-Seq", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "Illumina Genome Analyzer II", null, "ERP000263", "Illumina Genome Analyzer II paired end sequencing; Zebrafish gene three prime end pull down for genome annotation", "ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2010 08 19|ENA LAST UPDATE:2018 11 16", "3444_1.srf", "srf", 1358041568.0, 8934484.0, "E MTAB 308:Illumina Genome Analyzer II sequencing of Zebrafish embryo 1 dpf three prime pull down paired end 250 to 300 bp insert", "0:76 1:76", "A:376045982;C:281568469;G:271365867;T:407279179;N:21782071", 76, 76, null, null, 376045982, 281568469, 271365867, 407279179, 21782071, "ERX005932", "ERS012705", "ERA010603", "SC|Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute", "SC|Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute", 2, 0.94607, 0.94542, 0.3002, 0.30139, 0.73584, 0.74038, 0.51058, 0.51233, 76, 76, "B", "B", "biological fallback assumption", "illumina", "early_illumina", "3prime", "other", "unknown", "bulk", "unknown", "unknown", null, "United Kingdom", "2010-08-19", "Pharyngula", "Embryo", "Whole Organism", "All anatomical structures"], [7951, "ERR015565", "ERX005929", "ERS012704", "ERP000263", "PRJEB2208", "Zebrafish gene three prime end pull down for genome annotation", "E-MTAB-308", "Transcriptome Analysis", null, null, null, null, "E MTAB 308:Zebrafish embryo 5 dpf 2", "SAMEA980815", "SC", "Age:5 days|Alias:E MTAB 308:Zebrafish embryo 5 dpf 2|Broker name:ArrayExpress|Description:Protocols: Zebrafish embyos or tissues were collected from a Tuebingen strain incross and grown at 28 C. Collected samples were snap frozen on dry ice and stored at  70 C Total RNA was extracted using Trizol Reagent Invitrogen following the manufacturer's instructions. Pellets were resuspended RNase free 10 mM Tris pH 7.5 and the RNA was quantified using a NanoDrop ND 1000 Spectrophotometer Axon Instruments.|DevelopmentalStage:embryo|INSDC center name:SC|INSDC first public:2010 08 19T15:57:35Z|INSDC last update:2018 03 08T15:25:04Z|INSDC status:public|InitialTimePoint:fertilization|OrganismPart:whole organism|SRA accession:ERS012704|Sample Name:ERS012704|Sex:unknown sex|StrainOrLine:Tuebingen|Title:Danio rerio", null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, "Illumina Genome Analyzer II paired end sequencing; Zebrafish gene 3 prime end pull down for genome annotation", "E MTAB 308:Illumina Genome Analyzer II sequencing of Zebrafish embryo 5 dpf three prime pull down paired end 250 to 300 bp insert", "Zebrafish embro 5 dpf mRNA three prime end", "Zebrafish gene three prime end pull down for genome annotation", "20 ug of total RNA was fragmented using RNA Fragmentation Reagent Ambion for 5 minutes at 70 C and ethanol precipitated with glycogen and LiCl.   RNA was annealed to the oligo stBPM1polyT22 biotin GGCCAGTCCTGGAGTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTVN and bound to streptavidin  magnetic beads.   post washing by pull down on a magnet  the bound RNA was reverse transcribed with SuperScript II Invitrogen and a second strand synthesised with DNA polymerase I Promega and RNase H NEB.   post further washing  the double strand cDNA was released from the beads with BpmI NEB.   The cDNA was recovered with the QIAgen PCR Purification Kit and made into a standard Illumina library following the manufacturer's protocol with a fragment size of 250 to 300 bp.", "Experimental Factor: AGE:5 d|Experimental Factor: DEVELOPMENTAL STAGE:embryo|Experimental Factor: ORGANISM PART:whole organism|Experimental Factor: SEX:unknown sex", "RNA-Seq", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "Illumina Genome Analyzer II", null, "ERP000263", "Illumina Genome Analyzer II paired end sequencing; Zebrafish gene three prime end pull down for genome annotation", "ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2010 08 19|ENA LAST UPDATE:2018 11 16", "3444_5.srf", "srf", 1399629832.0, 9208091.0, "E MTAB 308:Illumina Genome Analyzer II sequencing of Zebrafish embryo 5 dpf three prime pull down paired end 250 to 300 bp insert", "0:76 1:76", "A:389123080;C:293319124;G:279736391;T:414876632;N:22574605", 76, 76, null, null, 389123080, 293319124, 279736391, 414876632, 22574605, "ERX005929", "ERS012704", "ERA010603", "SC|Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute", "SC|Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute", 2, 0.92999, 0.9332, 0.45309, 0.46162, 0.72419, 0.73919, 0.49892, 0.50512, 76, 76, "B", "B", "biological fallback assumption", "illumina", "early_illumina", "3prime", "other", "unknown", "bulk", "unknown", "unknown", null, "United Kingdom", "2010-08-19", "Larval", "Larval", "Whole Organism", "All anatomical structures"], [7952, "ERR015568", "ERX005928", "ERS000087", "ERP000263", "PRJEB2208", "Zebrafish gene three prime end pull down for genome annotation", "E-MTAB-308", "Transcriptome Analysis", null, null, null, null, "ZF male sample1", "SAMEA708829", "Wellcome Sanger Institute", "Alias:ZF male sample1|Description:RNA extracted from whole male adult zebrafish without xxx|INSDC center alias:SC|INSDC center name:Wellcome Sanger Institute|INSDC first public:2010 02 26T10:44:13Z|INSDC last update:2018 03 08T15:24:37Z|INSDC status:public|SRA accession:ERS000087|Sample Name:ERS000087|Sex:male|Strain:Tuebingen|Title:Danio rerio", null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, "Illumina Genome Analyzer II paired end sequencing; Zebrafish gene 3 prime end pull down for genome annotation", "E MTAB 308:Illumina Genome Analyzer II sequencing of adult Zebrafish male body dpf three prime pull down paired end 250 to 300 bp insert", "Zebrafish adult male body mRNA three prime end", "Zebrafish gene three prime end pull down for genome annotation", "20 ug of total RNA was fragmented using RNA Fragmentation Reagent Ambion for 5 minutes at 70 C and ethanol precipitated with glycogen and LiCl.   RNA was annealed to the oligo stBPM1polyT22 biotin GGCCAGTCCTGGAGTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTVN and bound to streptavidin  magnetic beads.   post washing by pull down on a magnet  the bound RNA was reverse transcribed with SuperScript II Invitrogen and a second strand synthesised with DNA polymerase I Promega and RNase H NEB.   post further washing  the double strand cDNA was released from the beads with BpmI NEB.   The cDNA was recovered with the QIAgen PCR Purification Kit and made into a standard Illumina library following the manufacturer's protocol with a fragment size of 250 to 300 bp.", "Experimental Factor: DEVELOPMENTAL STAGE:adult|Experimental Factor: ORGANISM PART:whole fish without xxx|Experimental Factor: SEX:male", "RNA-Seq", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "Illumina Genome Analyzer II", null, "ERP000263", "Illumina Genome Analyzer II paired end sequencing; Zebrafish gene three prime end pull down for genome annotation", "ENA FIRST PUBLIC:2010 08 19|ENA LAST UPDATE:2018 11 16", "3444_8.srf", "srf", 1012667320.0, 6662285.0, "E MTAB 308:Illumina Genome Analyzer II sequencing of adult Zebrafish male body dpf three prime pull down paired end 250 to 300 bp insert", "0:76 1:76", "A:262408681;C:234183204;G:228254982;T:271015871;N:16804582", 76, 76, null, null, 262408681, 234183204, 228254982, 271015871, 16804582, "ERX005928", "ERS000087", "ERA010603", "SC|Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute", "SC|Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute", 2, 0.95123, 0.96116, 0.23163, 0.22276, 0.77847, 0.78648, 0.42301, 0.43528, 76, 76, "B", "B", "biological fallback assumption", "illumina", "early_illumina", "3prime", "other", "unknown", "bulk", "unknown", "unknown", null, "United Kingdom", "2010-02-26", "Adult", "Adult", "Whole Organism", "All anatomical structures"], [25182, "SRR25670729", "SRX21396042", "SRS18636200", "SRP455680", "PRJNA1006406", "Control of polyA tail length and translation in vertebrate oocytes and early embryos", "GSE241107", "Other", "During oocyte maturation and early embryonic development  polyA tail lengths strongly influence mRNA translation. However  how tail lengths are controlled at different developmental stages has been unclear. Here  we performed tail length and translational profiling of mRNA reporter libraries each with > 10 million three prime UTR sequence variants in frog oocytes and embryos  and fish embryos. These analyses revealed that the UUUUA motif specifies cytoplasmic polyadenylation and identified diverse context features that modulate the activity of this 5 mer. Additional sequence motifs drive stage specific deadenylation in embryos  and UUUUA and C rich motifs drive tail length independent translational repression in oocytes. A neural network model accurately predicts tail length change during oocyte maturation in frogs  mice  and humans. Analyses of human sequence variants showed that those predicted to disrupt tail length control have been under negative selection  implying that our insights into control of polyA tail length and translation have implications for human health and fertility. Overall design: Sythetic mRNA reporter libraries with random three prime UTR sequences under four different sequence contexts were injected into frog oocytes and embryos and fish embryos. PolyA tail lengths were measured to at different developmental stages to examine sequence motifs that caused tail length changes. At the same time  polyA tail lengths of endogenous mRNAs from frog oocytes and embryos  fish embryos  and mouse oocytes were measured to investiage how their tail lengths were controlled. Please note that sample titles have been updated on Jan 6  2024.", null, null, null, "Fish embryo mRNA germ ring PAL seq v4", "GSM7716871", null, "source name:embryo|tissue:embryo|treatment:N1|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing", "Fish embryo mRNA germ ring PAL seq v4", "For gene specific tail seq of mRNA reporters  data were processed with a custom script available at https://github.com/coffeebond/MPRA tail seq. For PAL seq v3 or v4  reads were trimmed with cutadapt v3.7 with the parameters \u201c m 15   quality base=64  q 20 20   match read wildcards  e 0.05  a NNNNATCTCGTATGCCGTCTTCTGCTTG  O 7\u201d. The trimmed reads were mapped using STAR v2.7.1a to the reference database containing the genomic sequences of the organism from which the mRNAs were obtained  the genomic sequences of humans or fish  depending on which spike in RNAs were used  and the sequences of the polyA standards generated previously  with the parameters \u201c  runThreadN 16   runMode alignReads   outFilterMultimapNmax 1   outReadsUnmapped Fastx   outFilterType BySJout   outSAMattributes All   outSAMtype BAM Unsorted SortedByCoordinate\u201d. Uniquely mapped read were furhter processed with a custom script available at https://github.com/coffeebond/PAL seq. Assembly: Homo sapiens: GRCh38.p7 primary assembly. Mus muculus: GRCh38.p4  primary assembly. Xenopus laevis: v10.1 assembly. Danio rerio: GRCz11 assembly. Supplementary files format and content: For gene specific tail seq of mRNA reporters  tab delimited text files with columns indicating 1 sequence of the variable region; 2 median tail length; 3 number of reads; 4\u20137 tail lengths at quantile 10  25  75  and 90. Supplementary files format and content: For PAL seq v3 or v4  tab delimited files with columns indicating 1 gene ID or polyA site ID; 2 read cluster ID; 3 tail length Library strategy: PAL seq v4", "embryo", null, "Frog oocytes and embryos were lysed in ice cold buffer RL 20 mM HEPES pH 7.5  100 mM KCl  5 mM MgCl2  1% [v/v] Triton X 100  100 \u00b5g/ml cycloheximide  cOmplete protease inhibitor cocktail [1 tablet per 10 ml buffer]  and 200 units/ml SUPERase\u2022In in a volume of 10 \u00b5l per oocyte/embryo by vigorous shaking and pipetting. Lysates were cleared by centrifugation at 5000 g at 4\u00b0C for 10 min. The supernatant was transfered to a new tube and mixed with the Tri reagent for RNA isolation. Fish embryos were de chorionated by incubation with 2 mg/ml pronase in E3 medium for 4 min. post removing all E3 medium  Tri Reagent was added to the embryos for RNA isolation. Mouse GV oocytes were collected in 37\u00b0C MEM in the presence of milrinone to prevent maturation. Cumulus cells were removed from cumulus oocyte complexes by repeated aspiration through a glass pipette. GV oocytes were then collected in TRI reagent for RNA isolation. Mouse MII oocytes were harvested from the oviducts of hCG induced mice 16 hr  denuded with 3 mg/ml hyaluronidase for 2 min  washed  and then collected in Tri reagent for RNA isolation. For gene specific tail seq of reporter libraries  total RNA with reporter mRNA libraries was ligated to a pre adenylated 3\u02b9 adapter directly in most cases  but for the N60 library injected into fish embryos and frog oocytes  the N37 PAS N17 library injected into fish embryos and frog oocytes  and the CPEmos N60 and N60LC PASmos libraries injected into frog oocytes  reporter library mRNAs were enriched by anti sense oligo capture with biotinylated oligos. RNA isolated from the oocyte or embryo lysate was mixed with 8 pmol KXSH009  8 pmol KXSH010  and 2x SSC 0.3 M NaCl  30 mM sodium citrate pH 7.0 in a total of 50 \u00b5l. The RNA and oligos were annealed by incubation at 70\u00b0C for 5 min and then slowly cooling to 23\u00b0C at 0.1\u00b0C/sec. The annealed mixture was combined with 40 \u00b5l MyOne Streptavidin C1 beads Thermo Fisher  65002 and incubated for 20 min at 23\u00b0C on a thermal mixer  shaking with 15 sec on and 1 min 45 sec off. The supernatant was separated from the beads with a magnetic rack and removed. The beads were washed twice with 300 \u00b5l 1xB&W buffer 5 mM Tris HCl pH 7.5  0.5 mM EDTA  1 M NaCl and once with 300 \u00b5l 2x SSC. The RNA was eluted from the beads first with 100 \u00b5l 10 mM HEPES pH 7.5 at 65\u00b0C for 3 min and then second with 100 \u00b5l water at 65\u00b0C for 3 min. The eluates were combined  precipitated with ethanol  and resuspended in 6.5 \u00b5l water. The anti sense oligo enriched RNA or the RNA isolated from oocyte or embryo lysates was ligated to a pre adenylated 3\u02b9 adapter in a 10 \u00b5l reaction containing 5 \u00b5M 3\u02b9 adapter KXS330  50 mM HEPES pH 7.5  10 mM MgCl2  10 mM dithiothreitol  1 unit/\u00b5l T4 RNA ligase 1 New England Biolabs  M0204S. The ligation reaction was incubated at 23\u00b0C for 150 min. post ligation  RNA was extracted with phenol/chloroform  precipitated with ethanol  and resuspended in 11.4 \u00b5l water. The ligated RNA was mixed with 0.6 \u00b5l 100 \u00b5M reverse transcription primer KXS037 in a total volume of 12 \u00b5l  incubated at 65\u00b0C for 5 min  and cooled on ice for 1 min. The annealed RNA was reverse transcribed in a 20 \u00b5l reaction containing 1x First Strand Buffer  500 \u00b5M dNTPs  5 mM dithiothreitol  1 unit/\u00b5l SUPERase\u2022In  and 200 units SuperScript III Thermo Fisher  18080044 at 50\u00b0C for 1 hr. post reverse transcription  RNA was hydrolyzed with 3.3 \u00b5l 1 M NaOH at 90\u00b0C for 10 min  followed by neutralization with 36.7 \u00b5l 1 M HEPES pH 7.5 and the cDNA was collected by desalting with a Micro Bio Spin P 30 column. The cDNA library was amplified in a 50 \u00b5l PCR reaction with KXS037 and a barcoded primer Supplemental using the KAPA HiFi HotStart Kits following the manufacturer\u2019s suggested protocol for 10\u201315 cycles. The PCR amplified library was cleaned up twice with AMPure XP beads Beckman Coulter  A63881 with a beads to sample ratio of 1.2. For sequencing of endogenous mRNA polyA tail length  libraries were prepared with PAL seq v3 for frog oocytes or PAL seq v4 for frog embryos  fish embryos  and mouse oocytes as described previously PMID: 34213414. When preparing the sequencing libraries of mRNAs from fish embryos  a different 3\u02b9 adapter KXS013 was used for 3\u02b9 end ligation  and polyA selected mRNA from HeLa cells was used as spike in  replacing polyA selected mRNA from zebrafish ZF4 cell line. The first round of sequencing results suggested that a large fraction of the fish mRNA libraries was 5.8S rRNA. The cDNA of 5.8S rRNA was depleted from the cDNA libraries with an antisense oligo. The seven cDNA libraries made from mRNAs of zebrafish embryos at different stages were mixed at roughly equal molar ratios in a total of 5 fmol. Fifty pmol KXSH015 and 2x SSC were added in a total of 100 \u00b5l. The cDNAs and the oligo were annealed by incubation at 65\u00b0C for 5 min and then slowly cooling to 23\u00b0C at 0.1\u00b0C/sec. The annealed mixture was combined with 100 \u00b5l MyOne Streptavidin C1 beads and incubated for 20 min at 23\u00b0C on a thermal mixer  shaking with 15 sec on and 1 min 45 sec off. The supernatant was separated from the beads with a magnetic rack. The beads were washed once with 200 \u00b5l 1xB&W buffer. The supernatant and the wash were combined  precipitated with ethanol  and resuspended in 30 \u00b5l water. The oligo depleted libraries were sequenced again as a technical replicate. Sequencing data of replicates were merged for each sample post monitoring consistency.", null, "tissue:embryo|treatment:N1", "GSM7716871", "GSM7716871: Fish embryo mRNA germ ring PAL seq v4; Danio rerio; OTHER", "GSM7716871 r1", "GSM7716871", "1", "Frog oocytes and embryos were lysed in ice cold buffer RL 20 mM HEPES pH 7.5  100 mM KCl  5 mM MgCl2  1% [v/v] Triton X 100  100 \u00b5g/ml cycloheximide  cOmplete protease inhibitor cocktail [1 tablet per 10 ml buffer]  and 200 units/ml SUPERase\u2022In in a volume of 10 \u00b5l per oocyte/embryo by vigorous shaking and pipetting. Lysates were cleared by centrifugation at 5000 g at 4\u00b0C for 10 min. The supernatant was transfered to a new tube and mixed with the Tri reagent for RNA isolation. Fish embryos were de chorionated by incubation with 2 mg/ml pronase in E3 medium for 4 min. post removing all E3 medium  Tri Reagent was added to the embryos for RNA isolation. Mouse GV oocytes were collected in 37\u00b0C MEM in the presence of milrinone to prevent maturation. Cumulus cells were removed from cumulus oocyte complexes by repeated aspiration through a glass pipette. GV oocytes were then collected in TRI reagent for RNA isolation. Mouse MII oocytes were harvested from the oviducts of hCG induced mice 16 hr  denuded with 3 mg/ml hyaluronidase for 2 min  washed  and then collected in Tri reagent for RNA isolation. For gene specific tail seq of reporter libraries  total RNA with reporter mRNA libraries was ligated to a pre adenylated 3\u02b9 adapter directly in most cases  but for the N60 library injected into fish embryos and frog oocytes  the N37 PAS N17 library injected into fish embryos and frog oocytes  and the CPEmos N60 and N60LC PASmos libraries injected into frog oocytes  reporter library mRNAs were enriched by anti sense oligo capture with biotinylated oligos. RNA isolated from the oocyte or embryo lysate was mixed with 8 pmol KXSH009  8 pmol KXSH010  and 2x SSC 0.3 M NaCl  30 mM sodium citrate pH 7.0 in a total of 50 \u00b5l. The RNA and oligos were annealed by incubation at 70\u00b0C for 5 min and then slowly cooling to 23\u00b0C at 0.1\u00b0C/sec. The annealed mixture was combined with 40 \u00b5l MyOne Streptavidin C1 beads Thermo Fisher  65002 and incubated for 20 min at 23\u00b0C on a thermal mixer  shaking with 15 sec on and 1 min 45 sec off. The supernatant was separated from the beads with a magnetic rack and removed. The beads were washed twice with 300 \u00b5l 1xB&W buffer 5 mM Tris HCl pH 7.5  0.5 mM EDTA  1 M NaCl and once with 300 \u00b5l 2x SSC. The RNA was eluted from the beads first with 100 \u00b5l 10 mM HEPES pH 7.5 at 65\u00b0C for 3 min and then second with 100 \u00b5l water at 65\u00b0C for 3 min. The eluates were combined  precipitated with ethanol  and resuspended in 6.5 \u00b5l water. The anti sense oligo enriched RNA or the RNA isolated from oocyte or embryo lysates was ligated to a pre adenylated 3\u02b9 adapter in a 10 \u00b5l reaction containing 5 \u00b5M 3\u02b9 adapter KXS330  50 mM HEPES pH 7.5  10 mM MgCl2  10 mM dithiothreitol  1 unit/\u00b5l T4 RNA ligase 1 New England Biolabs  M0204S. The ligation reaction was incubated at 23\u00b0C for 150 min. post ligation  RNA was extracted with phenol/chloroform  precipitated with ethanol  and resuspended in 11.4 \u00b5l water. The ligated RNA was mixed with 0.6 \u00b5l 100 \u00b5M reverse transcription primer KXS037 in a total volume of 12 \u00b5l  incubated at 65\u00b0C for 5 min  and cooled on ice for 1 min. The annealed RNA was reverse transcribed in a 20 \u00b5l reaction containing 1x First Strand Buffer  500 \u00b5M dNTPs  5 mM dithiothreitol  1 unit/\u00b5l SUPERase\u2022In  and 200 units SuperScript III Thermo Fisher  18080044 at 50\u00b0C for 1 hr. post reverse transcription  RNA was hydrolyzed with 3.3 \u00b5l 1 M NaOH at 90\u00b0C for 10 min  followed by neutralization with 36.7 \u00b5l 1 M HEPES pH 7.5 and the cDNA was collected by desalting with a Micro Bio Spin P 30 column. The cDNA library was amplified in a 50 \u00b5l PCR reaction with KXS037 and a barcoded primer Supplemental using the KAPA HiFi HotStart Kits following the manufacturer's suggested protocol for 10\u201315 cycles. The PCR amplified library was cleaned up twice with AMPure XP beads Beckman Coulter  A63881 with a beads to sample ratio of 1.2. For sequencing of endogenous mRNA polyA tail length  libraries were prepared with PAL seq v3 for frog oocytes or PAL seq v4 for frog embryos  fish embryos  and mouse oocytes as described previously PMID: 34213414. When preparing the sequencing libraries of mRNAs from fish embryos  a different 3\u02b9 adapter KXS013 was used for 3\u02b9 end ligation  and polyA selected mRNA from HeLa cells was used as spike in  replacing polyA selected mRNA from zebrafish ZF4 cell line. The first round of sequencing results suggested that a large fraction of the fish mRNA libraries was 5.8S rRNA. The cDNA of 5.8S rRNA was depleted from the cDNA libraries with an antisense oligo. The seven cDNA libraries made from mRNAs of zebrafish embryos at different stages were mixed at roughly equal molar ratios in a total of 5 fmol. Fifty pmol KXSH015 and 2x SSC were added in a total of 100 \u00b5l. The cDNAs and the oligo were annealed by incubation at 65\u00b0C for 5 min and then slowly cooling to 23\u00b0C at 0.1\u00b0C/sec. The annealed mixture was combined with 100 \u00b5l MyOne Streptavidin C1 beads and incubated for 20 min at 23\u00b0C on a thermal mixer  shaking with 15 sec on and 1 min 45 sec off. The supernatant was separated from the beads with a magnetic rack. The beads were washed once with 200 \u00b5l 1xB&W buffer. The supernatant and the wash were combined  precipitated with ethanol  and resuspended in 30 \u00b5l water. The oligo depleted libraries were sequenced again as a technical replicate. Sequencing data of replicates were merged for each sample post monitoring consistency.", null, "OTHER", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "Illumina HiSeq 2500", null, "SRP455680", null, null, "Fish_embryo_mRNA_germ_ring_PAL_seq_v4_rep1_raw_read2.fastq.gz Fish_embryo_mRNA_germ_ring_PAL_seq_v4_rep1_raw_read1.fastq.gz", "fastq fastq", 2834842912.0, 9234016.0, "GSM7716871 r1", "0:52 1:255", "A:725811118;C:702410592;G:747583409;T:651018348;N:8019445", 52, 255, null, null, 725811118, 702410592, 747583409, 651018348, 8019445, "SRX21396042", "SRS18636200", "SRA1694849", "Whitehead Institute", "Whitehead Institute", 2, 0.00023, 0.30494, 8e-05, 0.01793, 0.99967, 0.99971, 0.5, 1.0, 52, 255, "T", "B", "mate1 technical by mapping diff", "illumina", "hiseq_era", "unknown", "poly_a", "unknown", "bulk", "bulk", "bulk", null, "United States", "2023-08-17", "Multi-stage", "Embryo", "Embryo Imprecise", "All anatomical structures"], [25183, "SRR25670730", "SRX21396042", "SRS18636200", "SRP455680", "PRJNA1006406", "Control of polyA tail length and translation in vertebrate oocytes and early embryos", "GSE241107", "Other", "During oocyte maturation and early embryonic development  polyA tail lengths strongly influence mRNA translation. However  how tail lengths are controlled at different developmental stages has been unclear. Here  we performed tail length and translational profiling of mRNA reporter libraries each with > 10 million three prime UTR sequence variants in frog oocytes and embryos  and fish embryos. These analyses revealed that the UUUUA motif specifies cytoplasmic polyadenylation and identified diverse context features that modulate the activity of this 5 mer. Additional sequence motifs drive stage specific deadenylation in embryos  and UUUUA and C rich motifs drive tail length independent translational repression in oocytes. A neural network model accurately predicts tail length change during oocyte maturation in frogs  mice  and humans. Analyses of human sequence variants showed that those predicted to disrupt tail length control have been under negative selection  implying that our insights into control of polyA tail length and translation have implications for human health and fertility. Overall design: Sythetic mRNA reporter libraries with random three prime UTR sequences under four different sequence contexts were injected into frog oocytes and embryos and fish embryos. PolyA tail lengths were measured to at different developmental stages to examine sequence motifs that caused tail length changes. At the same time  polyA tail lengths of endogenous mRNAs from frog oocytes and embryos  fish embryos  and mouse oocytes were measured to investiage how their tail lengths were controlled. Please note that sample titles have been updated on Jan 6  2024.", null, null, null, "Fish embryo mRNA germ ring PAL seq v4", "GSM7716871", null, "source name:embryo|tissue:embryo|treatment:N1|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing", "Fish embryo mRNA germ ring PAL seq v4", "For gene specific tail seq of mRNA reporters  data were processed with a custom script available at https://github.com/coffeebond/MPRA tail seq. For PAL seq v3 or v4  reads were trimmed with cutadapt v3.7 with the parameters \u201c m 15   quality base=64  q 20 20   match read wildcards  e 0.05  a NNNNATCTCGTATGCCGTCTTCTGCTTG  O 7\u201d. The trimmed reads were mapped using STAR v2.7.1a to the reference database containing the genomic sequences of the organism from which the mRNAs were obtained  the genomic sequences of humans or fish  depending on which spike in RNAs were used  and the sequences of the polyA standards generated previously  with the parameters \u201c  runThreadN 16   runMode alignReads   outFilterMultimapNmax 1   outReadsUnmapped Fastx   outFilterType BySJout   outSAMattributes All   outSAMtype BAM Unsorted SortedByCoordinate\u201d. Uniquely mapped read were furhter processed with a custom script available at https://github.com/coffeebond/PAL seq. Assembly: Homo sapiens: GRCh38.p7 primary assembly. Mus muculus: GRCh38.p4  primary assembly. Xenopus laevis: v10.1 assembly. Danio rerio: GRCz11 assembly. Supplementary files format and content: For gene specific tail seq of mRNA reporters  tab delimited text files with columns indicating 1 sequence of the variable region; 2 median tail length; 3 number of reads; 4\u20137 tail lengths at quantile 10  25  75  and 90. Supplementary files format and content: For PAL seq v3 or v4  tab delimited files with columns indicating 1 gene ID or polyA site ID; 2 read cluster ID; 3 tail length Library strategy: PAL seq v4", "embryo", null, "Frog oocytes and embryos were lysed in ice cold buffer RL 20 mM HEPES pH 7.5  100 mM KCl  5 mM MgCl2  1% [v/v] Triton X 100  100 \u00b5g/ml cycloheximide  cOmplete protease inhibitor cocktail [1 tablet per 10 ml buffer]  and 200 units/ml SUPERase\u2022In in a volume of 10 \u00b5l per oocyte/embryo by vigorous shaking and pipetting. Lysates were cleared by centrifugation at 5000 g at 4\u00b0C for 10 min. The supernatant was transfered to a new tube and mixed with the Tri reagent for RNA isolation. Fish embryos were de chorionated by incubation with 2 mg/ml pronase in E3 medium for 4 min. post removing all E3 medium  Tri Reagent was added to the embryos for RNA isolation. Mouse GV oocytes were collected in 37\u00b0C MEM in the presence of milrinone to prevent maturation. Cumulus cells were removed from cumulus oocyte complexes by repeated aspiration through a glass pipette. GV oocytes were then collected in TRI reagent for RNA isolation. Mouse MII oocytes were harvested from the oviducts of hCG induced mice 16 hr  denuded with 3 mg/ml hyaluronidase for 2 min  washed  and then collected in Tri reagent for RNA isolation. For gene specific tail seq of reporter libraries  total RNA with reporter mRNA libraries was ligated to a pre adenylated 3\u02b9 adapter directly in most cases  but for the N60 library injected into fish embryos and frog oocytes  the N37 PAS N17 library injected into fish embryos and frog oocytes  and the CPEmos N60 and N60LC PASmos libraries injected into frog oocytes  reporter library mRNAs were enriched by anti sense oligo capture with biotinylated oligos. RNA isolated from the oocyte or embryo lysate was mixed with 8 pmol KXSH009  8 pmol KXSH010  and 2x SSC 0.3 M NaCl  30 mM sodium citrate pH 7.0 in a total of 50 \u00b5l. The RNA and oligos were annealed by incubation at 70\u00b0C for 5 min and then slowly cooling to 23\u00b0C at 0.1\u00b0C/sec. The annealed mixture was combined with 40 \u00b5l MyOne Streptavidin C1 beads Thermo Fisher  65002 and incubated for 20 min at 23\u00b0C on a thermal mixer  shaking with 15 sec on and 1 min 45 sec off. The supernatant was separated from the beads with a magnetic rack and removed. The beads were washed twice with 300 \u00b5l 1xB&W buffer 5 mM Tris HCl pH 7.5  0.5 mM EDTA  1 M NaCl and once with 300 \u00b5l 2x SSC. The RNA was eluted from the beads first with 100 \u00b5l 10 mM HEPES pH 7.5 at 65\u00b0C for 3 min and then second with 100 \u00b5l water at 65\u00b0C for 3 min. The eluates were combined  precipitated with ethanol  and resuspended in 6.5 \u00b5l water. The anti sense oligo enriched RNA or the RNA isolated from oocyte or embryo lysates was ligated to a pre adenylated 3\u02b9 adapter in a 10 \u00b5l reaction containing 5 \u00b5M 3\u02b9 adapter KXS330  50 mM HEPES pH 7.5  10 mM MgCl2  10 mM dithiothreitol  1 unit/\u00b5l T4 RNA ligase 1 New England Biolabs  M0204S. The ligation reaction was incubated at 23\u00b0C for 150 min. post ligation  RNA was extracted with phenol/chloroform  precipitated with ethanol  and resuspended in 11.4 \u00b5l water. The ligated RNA was mixed with 0.6 \u00b5l 100 \u00b5M reverse transcription primer KXS037 in a total volume of 12 \u00b5l  incubated at 65\u00b0C for 5 min  and cooled on ice for 1 min. The annealed RNA was reverse transcribed in a 20 \u00b5l reaction containing 1x First Strand Buffer  500 \u00b5M dNTPs  5 mM dithiothreitol  1 unit/\u00b5l SUPERase\u2022In  and 200 units SuperScript III Thermo Fisher  18080044 at 50\u00b0C for 1 hr. post reverse transcription  RNA was hydrolyzed with 3.3 \u00b5l 1 M NaOH at 90\u00b0C for 10 min  followed by neutralization with 36.7 \u00b5l 1 M HEPES pH 7.5 and the cDNA was collected by desalting with a Micro Bio Spin P 30 column. The cDNA library was amplified in a 50 \u00b5l PCR reaction with KXS037 and a barcoded primer Supplemental using the KAPA HiFi HotStart Kits following the manufacturer\u2019s suggested protocol for 10\u201315 cycles. The PCR amplified library was cleaned up twice with AMPure XP beads Beckman Coulter  A63881 with a beads to sample ratio of 1.2. For sequencing of endogenous mRNA polyA tail length  libraries were prepared with PAL seq v3 for frog oocytes or PAL seq v4 for frog embryos  fish embryos  and mouse oocytes as described previously PMID: 34213414. When preparing the sequencing libraries of mRNAs from fish embryos  a different 3\u02b9 adapter KXS013 was used for 3\u02b9 end ligation  and polyA selected mRNA from HeLa cells was used as spike in  replacing polyA selected mRNA from zebrafish ZF4 cell line. The first round of sequencing results suggested that a large fraction of the fish mRNA libraries was 5.8S rRNA. The cDNA of 5.8S rRNA was depleted from the cDNA libraries with an antisense oligo. The seven cDNA libraries made from mRNAs of zebrafish embryos at different stages were mixed at roughly equal molar ratios in a total of 5 fmol. Fifty pmol KXSH015 and 2x SSC were added in a total of 100 \u00b5l. The cDNAs and the oligo were annealed by incubation at 65\u00b0C for 5 min and then slowly cooling to 23\u00b0C at 0.1\u00b0C/sec. The annealed mixture was combined with 100 \u00b5l MyOne Streptavidin C1 beads and incubated for 20 min at 23\u00b0C on a thermal mixer  shaking with 15 sec on and 1 min 45 sec off. The supernatant was separated from the beads with a magnetic rack. The beads were washed once with 200 \u00b5l 1xB&W buffer. The supernatant and the wash were combined  precipitated with ethanol  and resuspended in 30 \u00b5l water. The oligo depleted libraries were sequenced again as a technical replicate. Sequencing data of replicates were merged for each sample post monitoring consistency.", null, "tissue:embryo|treatment:N1", "GSM7716871", "GSM7716871: Fish embryo mRNA germ ring PAL seq v4; Danio rerio; OTHER", "GSM7716871 r1", "GSM7716871", "1", "Frog oocytes and embryos were lysed in ice cold buffer RL 20 mM HEPES pH 7.5  100 mM KCl  5 mM MgCl2  1% [v/v] Triton X 100  100 \u00b5g/ml cycloheximide  cOmplete protease inhibitor cocktail [1 tablet per 10 ml buffer]  and 200 units/ml SUPERase\u2022In in a volume of 10 \u00b5l per oocyte/embryo by vigorous shaking and pipetting. Lysates were cleared by centrifugation at 5000 g at 4\u00b0C for 10 min. The supernatant was transfered to a new tube and mixed with the Tri reagent for RNA isolation. Fish embryos were de chorionated by incubation with 2 mg/ml pronase in E3 medium for 4 min. post removing all E3 medium  Tri Reagent was added to the embryos for RNA isolation. Mouse GV oocytes were collected in 37\u00b0C MEM in the presence of milrinone to prevent maturation. Cumulus cells were removed from cumulus oocyte complexes by repeated aspiration through a glass pipette. GV oocytes were then collected in TRI reagent for RNA isolation. Mouse MII oocytes were harvested from the oviducts of hCG induced mice 16 hr  denuded with 3 mg/ml hyaluronidase for 2 min  washed  and then collected in Tri reagent for RNA isolation. For gene specific tail seq of reporter libraries  total RNA with reporter mRNA libraries was ligated to a pre adenylated 3\u02b9 adapter directly in most cases  but for the N60 library injected into fish embryos and frog oocytes  the N37 PAS N17 library injected into fish embryos and frog oocytes  and the CPEmos N60 and N60LC PASmos libraries injected into frog oocytes  reporter library mRNAs were enriched by anti sense oligo capture with biotinylated oligos. RNA isolated from the oocyte or embryo lysate was mixed with 8 pmol KXSH009  8 pmol KXSH010  and 2x SSC 0.3 M NaCl  30 mM sodium citrate pH 7.0 in a total of 50 \u00b5l. The RNA and oligos were annealed by incubation at 70\u00b0C for 5 min and then slowly cooling to 23\u00b0C at 0.1\u00b0C/sec. The annealed mixture was combined with 40 \u00b5l MyOne Streptavidin C1 beads Thermo Fisher  65002 and incubated for 20 min at 23\u00b0C on a thermal mixer  shaking with 15 sec on and 1 min 45 sec off. The supernatant was separated from the beads with a magnetic rack and removed. The beads were washed twice with 300 \u00b5l 1xB&W buffer 5 mM Tris HCl pH 7.5  0.5 mM EDTA  1 M NaCl and once with 300 \u00b5l 2x SSC. The RNA was eluted from the beads first with 100 \u00b5l 10 mM HEPES pH 7.5 at 65\u00b0C for 3 min and then second with 100 \u00b5l water at 65\u00b0C for 3 min. The eluates were combined  precipitated with ethanol  and resuspended in 6.5 \u00b5l water. The anti sense oligo enriched RNA or the RNA isolated from oocyte or embryo lysates was ligated to a pre adenylated 3\u02b9 adapter in a 10 \u00b5l reaction containing 5 \u00b5M 3\u02b9 adapter KXS330  50 mM HEPES pH 7.5  10 mM MgCl2  10 mM dithiothreitol  1 unit/\u00b5l T4 RNA ligase 1 New England Biolabs  M0204S. The ligation reaction was incubated at 23\u00b0C for 150 min. post ligation  RNA was extracted with phenol/chloroform  precipitated with ethanol  and resuspended in 11.4 \u00b5l water. The ligated RNA was mixed with 0.6 \u00b5l 100 \u00b5M reverse transcription primer KXS037 in a total volume of 12 \u00b5l  incubated at 65\u00b0C for 5 min  and cooled on ice for 1 min. The annealed RNA was reverse transcribed in a 20 \u00b5l reaction containing 1x First Strand Buffer  500 \u00b5M dNTPs  5 mM dithiothreitol  1 unit/\u00b5l SUPERase\u2022In  and 200 units SuperScript III Thermo Fisher  18080044 at 50\u00b0C for 1 hr. post reverse transcription  RNA was hydrolyzed with 3.3 \u00b5l 1 M NaOH at 90\u00b0C for 10 min  followed by neutralization with 36.7 \u00b5l 1 M HEPES pH 7.5 and the cDNA was collected by desalting with a Micro Bio Spin P 30 column. The cDNA library was amplified in a 50 \u00b5l PCR reaction with KXS037 and a barcoded primer Supplemental using the KAPA HiFi HotStart Kits following the manufacturer's suggested protocol for 10\u201315 cycles. The PCR amplified library was cleaned up twice with AMPure XP beads Beckman Coulter  A63881 with a beads to sample ratio of 1.2. For sequencing of endogenous mRNA polyA tail length  libraries were prepared with PAL seq v3 for frog oocytes or PAL seq v4 for frog embryos  fish embryos  and mouse oocytes as described previously PMID: 34213414. When preparing the sequencing libraries of mRNAs from fish embryos  a different 3\u02b9 adapter KXS013 was used for 3\u02b9 end ligation  and polyA selected mRNA from HeLa cells was used as spike in  replacing polyA selected mRNA from zebrafish ZF4 cell line. The first round of sequencing results suggested that a large fraction of the fish mRNA libraries was 5.8S rRNA. The cDNA of 5.8S rRNA was depleted from the cDNA libraries with an antisense oligo. The seven cDNA libraries made from mRNAs of zebrafish embryos at different stages were mixed at roughly equal molar ratios in a total of 5 fmol. Fifty pmol KXSH015 and 2x SSC were added in a total of 100 \u00b5l. The cDNAs and the oligo were annealed by incubation at 65\u00b0C for 5 min and then slowly cooling to 23\u00b0C at 0.1\u00b0C/sec. The annealed mixture was combined with 100 \u00b5l MyOne Streptavidin C1 beads and incubated for 20 min at 23\u00b0C on a thermal mixer  shaking with 15 sec on and 1 min 45 sec off. The supernatant was separated from the beads with a magnetic rack. The beads were washed once with 200 \u00b5l 1xB&W buffer. The supernatant and the wash were combined  precipitated with ethanol  and resuspended in 30 \u00b5l water. The oligo depleted libraries were sequenced again as a technical replicate. Sequencing data of replicates were merged for each sample post monitoring consistency.", null, "OTHER", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "Illumina HiSeq 2500", null, "SRP455680", null, null, "Fish_embryo_mRNA_germ_ring_PAL_seq_v4_rep2_raw_read1.fastq.gz Fish_embryo_mRNA_germ_ring_PAL_seq_v4_rep2_raw_read2.fastq.gz", "fastq fastq", 3473033898.0, 11312814.0, "GSM7716871 r2", "0:52 1:255", "A:853178471;C:899976159;G:962100712;T:750811461;N:6967095", 52, 255, null, null, 853178471, 899976159, 962100712, 750811461, 6967095, "SRX21396042", "SRS18636200", "SRA1694849", "Whitehead Institute", "Whitehead Institute", 2, 0.00049, 0.0, 0.00012, 0.0, 0.99941, 1.0, 0.64864, null, 52, 255, "T", "T", "mates < 9% mapping rate", "illumina", "hiseq_era", "unknown", "poly_a", "unknown", "bulk", "bulk", "bulk", null, "United States", "2023-08-17", "Multi-stage", "Embryo", "Embryo Imprecise", "All anatomical structures"], [25184, "SRR25670731", "SRX21396041", "SRS18636199", "SRP455680", "PRJNA1006406", "Control of polyA tail length and translation in vertebrate oocytes and early embryos", "GSE241107", "Other", "During oocyte maturation and early embryonic development  polyA tail lengths strongly influence mRNA translation. However  how tail lengths are controlled at different developmental stages has been unclear. Here  we performed tail length and translational profiling of mRNA reporter libraries each with > 10 million three prime UTR sequence variants in frog oocytes and embryos  and fish embryos. These analyses revealed that the UUUUA motif specifies cytoplasmic polyadenylation and identified diverse context features that modulate the activity of this 5 mer. Additional sequence motifs drive stage specific deadenylation in embryos  and UUUUA and C rich motifs drive tail length independent translational repression in oocytes. A neural network model accurately predicts tail length change during oocyte maturation in frogs  mice  and humans. Analyses of human sequence variants showed that those predicted to disrupt tail length control have been under negative selection  implying that our insights into control of polyA tail length and translation have implications for human health and fertility. Overall design: Sythetic mRNA reporter libraries with random three prime UTR sequences under four different sequence contexts were injected into frog oocytes and embryos and fish embryos. PolyA tail lengths were measured to at different developmental stages to examine sequence motifs that caused tail length changes. At the same time  polyA tail lengths of endogenous mRNAs from frog oocytes and embryos  fish embryos  and mouse oocytes were measured to investiage how their tail lengths were controlled. Please note that sample titles have been updated on Jan 6  2024.", null, null, null, "Fish embryo mRNA zfs:0000015 PAL seq v4", "GSM7716870", null, "source name:embryo|tissue:embryo|treatment:N1|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing", "Fish embryo mRNA zfs:0000015 PAL seq v4", "For gene specific tail seq of mRNA reporters  data were processed with a custom script available at https://github.com/coffeebond/MPRA tail seq. For PAL seq v3 or v4  reads were trimmed with cutadapt v3.7 with the parameters \u201c m 15   quality base=64  q 20 20   match read wildcards  e 0.05  a NNNNATCTCGTATGCCGTCTTCTGCTTG  O 7\u201d. The trimmed reads were mapped using STAR v2.7.1a to the reference database containing the genomic sequences of the organism from which the mRNAs were obtained  the genomic sequences of humans or fish  depending on which spike in RNAs were used  and the sequences of the polyA standards generated previously  with the parameters \u201c  runThreadN 16   runMode alignReads   outFilterMultimapNmax 1   outReadsUnmapped Fastx   outFilterType BySJout   outSAMattributes All   outSAMtype BAM Unsorted SortedByCoordinate\u201d. Uniquely mapped read were furhter processed with a custom script available at https://github.com/coffeebond/PAL seq. Assembly: Homo sapiens: GRCh38.p7 primary assembly. Mus muculus: GRCh38.p4  primary assembly. Xenopus laevis: v10.1 assembly. Danio rerio: GRCz11 assembly. Supplementary files format and content: For gene specific tail seq of mRNA reporters  tab delimited text files with columns indicating 1 sequence of the variable region; 2 median tail length; 3 number of reads; 4\u20137 tail lengths at quantile 10  25  75  and 90. Supplementary files format and content: For PAL seq v3 or v4  tab delimited files with columns indicating 1 gene ID or polyA site ID; 2 read cluster ID; 3 tail length Library strategy: PAL seq v4", "embryo", null, "Frog oocytes and embryos were lysed in ice cold buffer RL 20 mM HEPES pH 7.5  100 mM KCl  5 mM MgCl2  1% [v/v] Triton X 100  100 \u00b5g/ml cycloheximide  cOmplete protease inhibitor cocktail [1 tablet per 10 ml buffer]  and 200 units/ml SUPERase\u2022In in a volume of 10 \u00b5l per oocyte/embryo by vigorous shaking and pipetting. Lysates were cleared by centrifugation at 5000 g at 4\u00b0C for 10 min. The supernatant was transfered to a new tube and mixed with the Tri reagent for RNA isolation. Fish embryos were de chorionated by incubation with 2 mg/ml pronase in E3 medium for 4 min. post removing all E3 medium  Tri Reagent was added to the embryos for RNA isolation. Mouse GV oocytes were collected in 37\u00b0C MEM in the presence of milrinone to prevent maturation. Cumulus cells were removed from cumulus oocyte complexes by repeated aspiration through a glass pipette. GV oocytes were then collected in TRI reagent for RNA isolation. Mouse MII oocytes were harvested from the oviducts of hCG induced mice 16 hr  denuded with 3 mg/ml hyaluronidase for 2 min  washed  and then collected in Tri reagent for RNA isolation. For gene specific tail seq of reporter libraries  total RNA with reporter mRNA libraries was ligated to a pre adenylated 3\u02b9 adapter directly in most cases  but for the N60 library injected into fish embryos and frog oocytes  the N37 PAS N17 library injected into fish embryos and frog oocytes  and the CPEmos N60 and N60LC PASmos libraries injected into frog oocytes  reporter library mRNAs were enriched by anti sense oligo capture with biotinylated oligos. RNA isolated from the oocyte or embryo lysate was mixed with 8 pmol KXSH009  8 pmol KXSH010  and 2x SSC 0.3 M NaCl  30 mM sodium citrate pH 7.0 in a total of 50 \u00b5l. The RNA and oligos were annealed by incubation at 70\u00b0C for 5 min and then slowly cooling to 23\u00b0C at 0.1\u00b0C/sec. The annealed mixture was combined with 40 \u00b5l MyOne Streptavidin C1 beads Thermo Fisher  65002 and incubated for 20 min at 23\u00b0C on a thermal mixer  shaking with 15 sec on and 1 min 45 sec off. The supernatant was separated from the beads with a magnetic rack and removed. The beads were washed twice with 300 \u00b5l 1xB&W buffer 5 mM Tris HCl pH 7.5  0.5 mM EDTA  1 M NaCl and once with 300 \u00b5l 2x SSC. The RNA was eluted from the beads first with 100 \u00b5l 10 mM HEPES pH 7.5 at 65\u00b0C for 3 min and then second with 100 \u00b5l water at 65\u00b0C for 3 min. The eluates were combined  precipitated with ethanol  and resuspended in 6.5 \u00b5l water. The anti sense oligo enriched RNA or the RNA isolated from oocyte or embryo lysates was ligated to a pre adenylated 3\u02b9 adapter in a 10 \u00b5l reaction containing 5 \u00b5M 3\u02b9 adapter KXS330  50 mM HEPES pH 7.5  10 mM MgCl2  10 mM dithiothreitol  1 unit/\u00b5l T4 RNA ligase 1 New England Biolabs  M0204S. The ligation reaction was incubated at 23\u00b0C for 150 min. post ligation  RNA was extracted with phenol/chloroform  precipitated with ethanol  and resuspended in 11.4 \u00b5l water. The ligated RNA was mixed with 0.6 \u00b5l 100 \u00b5M reverse transcription primer KXS037 in a total volume of 12 \u00b5l  incubated at 65\u00b0C for 5 min  and cooled on ice for 1 min. The annealed RNA was reverse transcribed in a 20 \u00b5l reaction containing 1x First Strand Buffer  500 \u00b5M dNTPs  5 mM dithiothreitol  1 unit/\u00b5l SUPERase\u2022In  and 200 units SuperScript III Thermo Fisher  18080044 at 50\u00b0C for 1 hr. post reverse transcription  RNA was hydrolyzed with 3.3 \u00b5l 1 M NaOH at 90\u00b0C for 10 min  followed by neutralization with 36.7 \u00b5l 1 M HEPES pH 7.5 and the cDNA was collected by desalting with a Micro Bio Spin P 30 column. The cDNA library was amplified in a 50 \u00b5l PCR reaction with KXS037 and a barcoded primer Supplemental using the KAPA HiFi HotStart Kits following the manufacturer\u2019s suggested protocol for 10\u201315 cycles. The PCR amplified library was cleaned up twice with AMPure XP beads Beckman Coulter  A63881 with a beads to sample ratio of 1.2. For sequencing of endogenous mRNA polyA tail length  libraries were prepared with PAL seq v3 for frog oocytes or PAL seq v4 for frog embryos  fish embryos  and mouse oocytes as described previously PMID: 34213414. When preparing the sequencing libraries of mRNAs from fish embryos  a different 3\u02b9 adapter KXS013 was used for 3\u02b9 end ligation  and polyA selected mRNA from HeLa cells was used as spike in  replacing polyA selected mRNA from zebrafish ZF4 cell line. The first round of sequencing results suggested that a large fraction of the fish mRNA libraries was 5.8S rRNA. The cDNA of 5.8S rRNA was depleted from the cDNA libraries with an antisense oligo. The seven cDNA libraries made from mRNAs of zebrafish embryos at different stages were mixed at roughly equal molar ratios in a total of 5 fmol. Fifty pmol KXSH015 and 2x SSC were added in a total of 100 \u00b5l. The cDNAs and the oligo were annealed by incubation at 65\u00b0C for 5 min and then slowly cooling to 23\u00b0C at 0.1\u00b0C/sec. The annealed mixture was combined with 100 \u00b5l MyOne Streptavidin C1 beads and incubated for 20 min at 23\u00b0C on a thermal mixer  shaking with 15 sec on and 1 min 45 sec off. The supernatant was separated from the beads with a magnetic rack. The beads were washed once with 200 \u00b5l 1xB&W buffer. The supernatant and the wash were combined  precipitated with ethanol  and resuspended in 30 \u00b5l water. The oligo depleted libraries were sequenced again as a technical replicate. Sequencing data of replicates were merged for each sample post monitoring consistency.", null, "tissue:embryo|treatment:N1", "GSM7716870", "GSM7716870: Fish embryo mRNA zfs:0000015 PAL seq v4; Danio rerio; OTHER", "GSM7716870 r1", "GSM7716870", "1", "Frog oocytes and embryos were lysed in ice cold buffer RL 20 mM HEPES pH 7.5  100 mM KCl  5 mM MgCl2  1% [v/v] Triton X 100  100 \u00b5g/ml cycloheximide  cOmplete protease inhibitor cocktail [1 tablet per 10 ml buffer]  and 200 units/ml SUPERase\u2022In in a volume of 10 \u00b5l per oocyte/embryo by vigorous shaking and pipetting. Lysates were cleared by centrifugation at 5000 g at 4\u00b0C for 10 min. The supernatant was transfered to a new tube and mixed with the Tri reagent for RNA isolation. Fish embryos were de chorionated by incubation with 2 mg/ml pronase in E3 medium for 4 min. post removing all E3 medium  Tri Reagent was added to the embryos for RNA isolation. Mouse GV oocytes were collected in 37\u00b0C MEM in the presence of milrinone to prevent maturation. Cumulus cells were removed from cumulus oocyte complexes by repeated aspiration through a glass pipette. GV oocytes were then collected in TRI reagent for RNA isolation. Mouse MII oocytes were harvested from the oviducts of hCG induced mice 16 hr  denuded with 3 mg/ml hyaluronidase for 2 min  washed  and then collected in Tri reagent for RNA isolation. For gene specific tail seq of reporter libraries  total RNA with reporter mRNA libraries was ligated to a pre adenylated 3\u02b9 adapter directly in most cases  but for the N60 library injected into fish embryos and frog oocytes  the N37 PAS N17 library injected into fish embryos and frog oocytes  and the CPEmos N60 and N60LC PASmos libraries injected into frog oocytes  reporter library mRNAs were enriched by anti sense oligo capture with biotinylated oligos. RNA isolated from the oocyte or embryo lysate was mixed with 8 pmol KXSH009  8 pmol KXSH010  and 2x SSC 0.3 M NaCl  30 mM sodium citrate pH 7.0 in a total of 50 \u00b5l. The RNA and oligos were annealed by incubation at 70\u00b0C for 5 min and then slowly cooling to 23\u00b0C at 0.1\u00b0C/sec. The annealed mixture was combined with 40 \u00b5l MyOne Streptavidin C1 beads Thermo Fisher  65002 and incubated for 20 min at 23\u00b0C on a thermal mixer  shaking with 15 sec on and 1 min 45 sec off. The supernatant was separated from the beads with a magnetic rack and removed. The beads were washed twice with 300 \u00b5l 1xB&W buffer 5 mM Tris HCl pH 7.5  0.5 mM EDTA  1 M NaCl and once with 300 \u00b5l 2x SSC. The RNA was eluted from the beads first with 100 \u00b5l 10 mM HEPES pH 7.5 at 65\u00b0C for 3 min and then second with 100 \u00b5l water at 65\u00b0C for 3 min. The eluates were combined  precipitated with ethanol  and resuspended in 6.5 \u00b5l water. The anti sense oligo enriched RNA or the RNA isolated from oocyte or embryo lysates was ligated to a pre adenylated 3\u02b9 adapter in a 10 \u00b5l reaction containing 5 \u00b5M 3\u02b9 adapter KXS330  50 mM HEPES pH 7.5  10 mM MgCl2  10 mM dithiothreitol  1 unit/\u00b5l T4 RNA ligase 1 New England Biolabs  M0204S. The ligation reaction was incubated at 23\u00b0C for 150 min. post ligation  RNA was extracted with phenol/chloroform  precipitated with ethanol  and resuspended in 11.4 \u00b5l water. The ligated RNA was mixed with 0.6 \u00b5l 100 \u00b5M reverse transcription primer KXS037 in a total volume of 12 \u00b5l  incubated at 65\u00b0C for 5 min  and cooled on ice for 1 min. The annealed RNA was reverse transcribed in a 20 \u00b5l reaction containing 1x First Strand Buffer  500 \u00b5M dNTPs  5 mM dithiothreitol  1 unit/\u00b5l SUPERase\u2022In  and 200 units SuperScript III Thermo Fisher  18080044 at 50\u00b0C for 1 hr. post reverse transcription  RNA was hydrolyzed with 3.3 \u00b5l 1 M NaOH at 90\u00b0C for 10 min  followed by neutralization with 36.7 \u00b5l 1 M HEPES pH 7.5 and the cDNA was collected by desalting with a Micro Bio Spin P 30 column. The cDNA library was amplified in a 50 \u00b5l PCR reaction with KXS037 and a barcoded primer Supplemental using the KAPA HiFi HotStart Kits following the manufacturer's suggested protocol for 10\u201315 cycles. The PCR amplified library was cleaned up twice with AMPure XP beads Beckman Coulter  A63881 with a beads to sample ratio of 1.2. For sequencing of endogenous mRNA polyA tail length  libraries were prepared with PAL seq v3 for frog oocytes or PAL seq v4 for frog embryos  fish embryos  and mouse oocytes as described previously PMID: 34213414. When preparing the sequencing libraries of mRNAs from fish embryos  a different 3\u02b9 adapter KXS013 was used for 3\u02b9 end ligation  and polyA selected mRNA from HeLa cells was used as spike in  replacing polyA selected mRNA from zebrafish ZF4 cell line. The first round of sequencing results suggested that a large fraction of the fish mRNA libraries was 5.8S rRNA. The cDNA of 5.8S rRNA was depleted from the cDNA libraries with an antisense oligo. The seven cDNA libraries made from mRNAs of zebrafish embryos at different stages were mixed at roughly equal molar ratios in a total of 5 fmol. Fifty pmol KXSH015 and 2x SSC were added in a total of 100 \u00b5l. The cDNAs and the oligo were annealed by incubation at 65\u00b0C for 5 min and then slowly cooling to 23\u00b0C at 0.1\u00b0C/sec. The annealed mixture was combined with 100 \u00b5l MyOne Streptavidin C1 beads and incubated for 20 min at 23\u00b0C on a thermal mixer  shaking with 15 sec on and 1 min 45 sec off. The supernatant was separated from the beads with a magnetic rack. The beads were washed once with 200 \u00b5l 1xB&W buffer. The supernatant and the wash were combined  precipitated with ethanol  and resuspended in 30 \u00b5l water. The oligo depleted libraries were sequenced again as a technical replicate. Sequencing data of replicates were merged for each sample post monitoring consistency.", null, "OTHER", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "Illumina HiSeq 2500", null, "SRP455680", null, null, "Fish_embryo_mRNA_30percent_epiboly_PAL_seq_v4_rep1_raw_read1.fastq.gz Fish_embryo_mRNA_30percent_epiboly_PAL_seq_v4_rep1_raw_read2.fastq.gz", "fastq fastq", 2695203962.0, 8779166.0, "GSM7716870 r1", "0:52 1:255", "A:684535386;C:669852151;G:719008886;T:614209811;N:7597728", 52, 255, null, null, 684535386, 669852151, 719008886, 614209811, 7597728, "SRX21396041", "SRS18636199", "SRA1694849", "Whitehead Institute", "Whitehead Institute", 2, 0.00117, 0.35837, 0.00017, 0.00682, 0.99859, 0.99963, 0.69473, 1.0, 52, 255, "T", "B", "mate1 technical by mapping diff", "illumina", "hiseq_era", "unknown", "poly_a", "unknown", "bulk", "bulk", "bulk", null, "United States", "2023-08-17", "Multi-stage", "Embryo", "Embryo Imprecise", "All anatomical structures"], [25185, "SRR25670732", "SRX21396041", "SRS18636199", "SRP455680", "PRJNA1006406", "Control of polyA tail length and translation in vertebrate oocytes and early embryos", "GSE241107", "Other", "During oocyte maturation and early embryonic development  polyA tail lengths strongly influence mRNA translation. However  how tail lengths are controlled at different developmental stages has been unclear. Here  we performed tail length and translational profiling of mRNA reporter libraries each with > 10 million three prime UTR sequence variants in frog oocytes and embryos  and fish embryos. These analyses revealed that the UUUUA motif specifies cytoplasmic polyadenylation and identified diverse context features that modulate the activity of this 5 mer. Additional sequence motifs drive stage specific deadenylation in embryos  and UUUUA and C rich motifs drive tail length independent translational repression in oocytes. A neural network model accurately predicts tail length change during oocyte maturation in frogs  mice  and humans. Analyses of human sequence variants showed that those predicted to disrupt tail length control have been under negative selection  implying that our insights into control of polyA tail length and translation have implications for human health and fertility. Overall design: Sythetic mRNA reporter libraries with random three prime UTR sequences under four different sequence contexts were injected into frog oocytes and embryos and fish embryos. PolyA tail lengths were measured to at different developmental stages to examine sequence motifs that caused tail length changes. At the same time  polyA tail lengths of endogenous mRNAs from frog oocytes and embryos  fish embryos  and mouse oocytes were measured to investiage how their tail lengths were controlled. Please note that sample titles have been updated on Jan 6  2024.", null, null, null, "Fish embryo mRNA zfs:0000015 PAL seq v4", "GSM7716870", null, "source name:embryo|tissue:embryo|treatment:N1|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing", "Fish embryo mRNA zfs:0000015 PAL seq v4", "For gene specific tail seq of mRNA reporters  data were processed with a custom script available at https://github.com/coffeebond/MPRA tail seq. For PAL seq v3 or v4  reads were trimmed with cutadapt v3.7 with the parameters \u201c m 15   quality base=64  q 20 20   match read wildcards  e 0.05  a NNNNATCTCGTATGCCGTCTTCTGCTTG  O 7\u201d. The trimmed reads were mapped using STAR v2.7.1a to the reference database containing the genomic sequences of the organism from which the mRNAs were obtained  the genomic sequences of humans or fish  depending on which spike in RNAs were used  and the sequences of the polyA standards generated previously  with the parameters \u201c  runThreadN 16   runMode alignReads   outFilterMultimapNmax 1   outReadsUnmapped Fastx   outFilterType BySJout   outSAMattributes All   outSAMtype BAM Unsorted SortedByCoordinate\u201d. Uniquely mapped read were furhter processed with a custom script available at https://github.com/coffeebond/PAL seq. Assembly: Homo sapiens: GRCh38.p7 primary assembly. Mus muculus: GRCh38.p4  primary assembly. Xenopus laevis: v10.1 assembly. Danio rerio: GRCz11 assembly. Supplementary files format and content: For gene specific tail seq of mRNA reporters  tab delimited text files with columns indicating 1 sequence of the variable region; 2 median tail length; 3 number of reads; 4\u20137 tail lengths at quantile 10  25  75  and 90. Supplementary files format and content: For PAL seq v3 or v4  tab delimited files with columns indicating 1 gene ID or polyA site ID; 2 read cluster ID; 3 tail length Library strategy: PAL seq v4", "embryo", null, "Frog oocytes and embryos were lysed in ice cold buffer RL 20 mM HEPES pH 7.5  100 mM KCl  5 mM MgCl2  1% [v/v] Triton X 100  100 \u00b5g/ml cycloheximide  cOmplete protease inhibitor cocktail [1 tablet per 10 ml buffer]  and 200 units/ml SUPERase\u2022In in a volume of 10 \u00b5l per oocyte/embryo by vigorous shaking and pipetting. Lysates were cleared by centrifugation at 5000 g at 4\u00b0C for 10 min. The supernatant was transfered to a new tube and mixed with the Tri reagent for RNA isolation. Fish embryos were de chorionated by incubation with 2 mg/ml pronase in E3 medium for 4 min. post removing all E3 medium  Tri Reagent was added to the embryos for RNA isolation. Mouse GV oocytes were collected in 37\u00b0C MEM in the presence of milrinone to prevent maturation. Cumulus cells were removed from cumulus oocyte complexes by repeated aspiration through a glass pipette. GV oocytes were then collected in TRI reagent for RNA isolation. Mouse MII oocytes were harvested from the oviducts of hCG induced mice 16 hr  denuded with 3 mg/ml hyaluronidase for 2 min  washed  and then collected in Tri reagent for RNA isolation. For gene specific tail seq of reporter libraries  total RNA with reporter mRNA libraries was ligated to a pre adenylated 3\u02b9 adapter directly in most cases  but for the N60 library injected into fish embryos and frog oocytes  the N37 PAS N17 library injected into fish embryos and frog oocytes  and the CPEmos N60 and N60LC PASmos libraries injected into frog oocytes  reporter library mRNAs were enriched by anti sense oligo capture with biotinylated oligos. RNA isolated from the oocyte or embryo lysate was mixed with 8 pmol KXSH009  8 pmol KXSH010  and 2x SSC 0.3 M NaCl  30 mM sodium citrate pH 7.0 in a total of 50 \u00b5l. The RNA and oligos were annealed by incubation at 70\u00b0C for 5 min and then slowly cooling to 23\u00b0C at 0.1\u00b0C/sec. The annealed mixture was combined with 40 \u00b5l MyOne Streptavidin C1 beads Thermo Fisher  65002 and incubated for 20 min at 23\u00b0C on a thermal mixer  shaking with 15 sec on and 1 min 45 sec off. The supernatant was separated from the beads with a magnetic rack and removed. The beads were washed twice with 300 \u00b5l 1xB&W buffer 5 mM Tris HCl pH 7.5  0.5 mM EDTA  1 M NaCl and once with 300 \u00b5l 2x SSC. The RNA was eluted from the beads first with 100 \u00b5l 10 mM HEPES pH 7.5 at 65\u00b0C for 3 min and then second with 100 \u00b5l water at 65\u00b0C for 3 min. The eluates were combined  precipitated with ethanol  and resuspended in 6.5 \u00b5l water. The anti sense oligo enriched RNA or the RNA isolated from oocyte or embryo lysates was ligated to a pre adenylated 3\u02b9 adapter in a 10 \u00b5l reaction containing 5 \u00b5M 3\u02b9 adapter KXS330  50 mM HEPES pH 7.5  10 mM MgCl2  10 mM dithiothreitol  1 unit/\u00b5l T4 RNA ligase 1 New England Biolabs  M0204S. The ligation reaction was incubated at 23\u00b0C for 150 min. post ligation  RNA was extracted with phenol/chloroform  precipitated with ethanol  and resuspended in 11.4 \u00b5l water. The ligated RNA was mixed with 0.6 \u00b5l 100 \u00b5M reverse transcription primer KXS037 in a total volume of 12 \u00b5l  incubated at 65\u00b0C for 5 min  and cooled on ice for 1 min. The annealed RNA was reverse transcribed in a 20 \u00b5l reaction containing 1x First Strand Buffer  500 \u00b5M dNTPs  5 mM dithiothreitol  1 unit/\u00b5l SUPERase\u2022In  and 200 units SuperScript III Thermo Fisher  18080044 at 50\u00b0C for 1 hr. post reverse transcription  RNA was hydrolyzed with 3.3 \u00b5l 1 M NaOH at 90\u00b0C for 10 min  followed by neutralization with 36.7 \u00b5l 1 M HEPES pH 7.5 and the cDNA was collected by desalting with a Micro Bio Spin P 30 column. The cDNA library was amplified in a 50 \u00b5l PCR reaction with KXS037 and a barcoded primer Supplemental using the KAPA HiFi HotStart Kits following the manufacturer\u2019s suggested protocol for 10\u201315 cycles. The PCR amplified library was cleaned up twice with AMPure XP beads Beckman Coulter  A63881 with a beads to sample ratio of 1.2. For sequencing of endogenous mRNA polyA tail length  libraries were prepared with PAL seq v3 for frog oocytes or PAL seq v4 for frog embryos  fish embryos  and mouse oocytes as described previously PMID: 34213414. When preparing the sequencing libraries of mRNAs from fish embryos  a different 3\u02b9 adapter KXS013 was used for 3\u02b9 end ligation  and polyA selected mRNA from HeLa cells was used as spike in  replacing polyA selected mRNA from zebrafish ZF4 cell line. The first round of sequencing results suggested that a large fraction of the fish mRNA libraries was 5.8S rRNA. The cDNA of 5.8S rRNA was depleted from the cDNA libraries with an antisense oligo. The seven cDNA libraries made from mRNAs of zebrafish embryos at different stages were mixed at roughly equal molar ratios in a total of 5 fmol. Fifty pmol KXSH015 and 2x SSC were added in a total of 100 \u00b5l. The cDNAs and the oligo were annealed by incubation at 65\u00b0C for 5 min and then slowly cooling to 23\u00b0C at 0.1\u00b0C/sec. The annealed mixture was combined with 100 \u00b5l MyOne Streptavidin C1 beads and incubated for 20 min at 23\u00b0C on a thermal mixer  shaking with 15 sec on and 1 min 45 sec off. The supernatant was separated from the beads with a magnetic rack. The beads were washed once with 200 \u00b5l 1xB&W buffer. The supernatant and the wash were combined  precipitated with ethanol  and resuspended in 30 \u00b5l water. The oligo depleted libraries were sequenced again as a technical replicate. Sequencing data of replicates were merged for each sample post monitoring consistency.", null, "tissue:embryo|treatment:N1", "GSM7716870", "GSM7716870: Fish embryo mRNA zfs:0000015 PAL seq v4; Danio rerio; OTHER", "GSM7716870 r1", "GSM7716870", "1", "Frog oocytes and embryos were lysed in ice cold buffer RL 20 mM HEPES pH 7.5  100 mM KCl  5 mM MgCl2  1% [v/v] Triton X 100  100 \u00b5g/ml cycloheximide  cOmplete protease inhibitor cocktail [1 tablet per 10 ml buffer]  and 200 units/ml SUPERase\u2022In in a volume of 10 \u00b5l per oocyte/embryo by vigorous shaking and pipetting. Lysates were cleared by centrifugation at 5000 g at 4\u00b0C for 10 min. The supernatant was transfered to a new tube and mixed with the Tri reagent for RNA isolation. Fish embryos were de chorionated by incubation with 2 mg/ml pronase in E3 medium for 4 min. post removing all E3 medium  Tri Reagent was added to the embryos for RNA isolation. Mouse GV oocytes were collected in 37\u00b0C MEM in the presence of milrinone to prevent maturation. Cumulus cells were removed from cumulus oocyte complexes by repeated aspiration through a glass pipette. GV oocytes were then collected in TRI reagent for RNA isolation. Mouse MII oocytes were harvested from the oviducts of hCG induced mice 16 hr  denuded with 3 mg/ml hyaluronidase for 2 min  washed  and then collected in Tri reagent for RNA isolation. For gene specific tail seq of reporter libraries  total RNA with reporter mRNA libraries was ligated to a pre adenylated 3\u02b9 adapter directly in most cases  but for the N60 library injected into fish embryos and frog oocytes  the N37 PAS N17 library injected into fish embryos and frog oocytes  and the CPEmos N60 and N60LC PASmos libraries injected into frog oocytes  reporter library mRNAs were enriched by anti sense oligo capture with biotinylated oligos. RNA isolated from the oocyte or embryo lysate was mixed with 8 pmol KXSH009  8 pmol KXSH010  and 2x SSC 0.3 M NaCl  30 mM sodium citrate pH 7.0 in a total of 50 \u00b5l. The RNA and oligos were annealed by incubation at 70\u00b0C for 5 min and then slowly cooling to 23\u00b0C at 0.1\u00b0C/sec. The annealed mixture was combined with 40 \u00b5l MyOne Streptavidin C1 beads Thermo Fisher  65002 and incubated for 20 min at 23\u00b0C on a thermal mixer  shaking with 15 sec on and 1 min 45 sec off. The supernatant was separated from the beads with a magnetic rack and removed. The beads were washed twice with 300 \u00b5l 1xB&W buffer 5 mM Tris HCl pH 7.5  0.5 mM EDTA  1 M NaCl and once with 300 \u00b5l 2x SSC. The RNA was eluted from the beads first with 100 \u00b5l 10 mM HEPES pH 7.5 at 65\u00b0C for 3 min and then second with 100 \u00b5l water at 65\u00b0C for 3 min. The eluates were combined  precipitated with ethanol  and resuspended in 6.5 \u00b5l water. The anti sense oligo enriched RNA or the RNA isolated from oocyte or embryo lysates was ligated to a pre adenylated 3\u02b9 adapter in a 10 \u00b5l reaction containing 5 \u00b5M 3\u02b9 adapter KXS330  50 mM HEPES pH 7.5  10 mM MgCl2  10 mM dithiothreitol  1 unit/\u00b5l T4 RNA ligase 1 New England Biolabs  M0204S. The ligation reaction was incubated at 23\u00b0C for 150 min. post ligation  RNA was extracted with phenol/chloroform  precipitated with ethanol  and resuspended in 11.4 \u00b5l water. The ligated RNA was mixed with 0.6 \u00b5l 100 \u00b5M reverse transcription primer KXS037 in a total volume of 12 \u00b5l  incubated at 65\u00b0C for 5 min  and cooled on ice for 1 min. The annealed RNA was reverse transcribed in a 20 \u00b5l reaction containing 1x First Strand Buffer  500 \u00b5M dNTPs  5 mM dithiothreitol  1 unit/\u00b5l SUPERase\u2022In  and 200 units SuperScript III Thermo Fisher  18080044 at 50\u00b0C for 1 hr. post reverse transcription  RNA was hydrolyzed with 3.3 \u00b5l 1 M NaOH at 90\u00b0C for 10 min  followed by neutralization with 36.7 \u00b5l 1 M HEPES pH 7.5 and the cDNA was collected by desalting with a Micro Bio Spin P 30 column. The cDNA library was amplified in a 50 \u00b5l PCR reaction with KXS037 and a barcoded primer Supplemental using the KAPA HiFi HotStart Kits following the manufacturer's suggested protocol for 10\u201315 cycles. The PCR amplified library was cleaned up twice with AMPure XP beads Beckman Coulter  A63881 with a beads to sample ratio of 1.2. For sequencing of endogenous mRNA polyA tail length  libraries were prepared with PAL seq v3 for frog oocytes or PAL seq v4 for frog embryos  fish embryos  and mouse oocytes as described previously PMID: 34213414. When preparing the sequencing libraries of mRNAs from fish embryos  a different 3\u02b9 adapter KXS013 was used for 3\u02b9 end ligation  and polyA selected mRNA from HeLa cells was used as spike in  replacing polyA selected mRNA from zebrafish ZF4 cell line. The first round of sequencing results suggested that a large fraction of the fish mRNA libraries was 5.8S rRNA. The cDNA of 5.8S rRNA was depleted from the cDNA libraries with an antisense oligo. The seven cDNA libraries made from mRNAs of zebrafish embryos at different stages were mixed at roughly equal molar ratios in a total of 5 fmol. Fifty pmol KXSH015 and 2x SSC were added in a total of 100 \u00b5l. The cDNAs and the oligo were annealed by incubation at 65\u00b0C for 5 min and then slowly cooling to 23\u00b0C at 0.1\u00b0C/sec. The annealed mixture was combined with 100 \u00b5l MyOne Streptavidin C1 beads and incubated for 20 min at 23\u00b0C on a thermal mixer  shaking with 15 sec on and 1 min 45 sec off. The supernatant was separated from the beads with a magnetic rack. The beads were washed once with 200 \u00b5l 1xB&W buffer. The supernatant and the wash were combined  precipitated with ethanol  and resuspended in 30 \u00b5l water. The oligo depleted libraries were sequenced again as a technical replicate. Sequencing data of replicates were merged for each sample post monitoring consistency.", null, "OTHER", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "Illumina HiSeq 2500", null, "SRP455680", null, null, "Fish_embryo_mRNA_30percent_epiboly_PAL_seq_v4_rep2_raw_read2.fastq.gz Fish_embryo_mRNA_30percent_epiboly_PAL_seq_v4_rep2_raw_read1.fastq.gz", "fastq fastq", 3476338446.0, 11323578.0, "GSM7716870 r2", "0:52 1:255", "A:841832234;C:898325199;G:968774318;T:760398070;N:7008625", 52, 255, null, null, 841832234, 898325199, 968774318, 760398070, 7008625, "SRX21396041", "SRS18636199", "SRA1694849", "Whitehead Institute", "Whitehead Institute", 2, 0.00245, 0.0, 0.00047, 0.0, 0.99803, 1.0, 0.58536, null, 52, 255, "T", "T", "mates < 9% mapping rate", "illumina", "hiseq_era", "unknown", "poly_a", "unknown", "bulk", "bulk", "bulk", null, "United States", "2023-08-17", "Multi-stage", "Embryo", "Embryo Imprecise", "All anatomical structures"], [25186, "SRR25670733", "SRX21396040", "SRS18636198", "SRP455680", "PRJNA1006406", "Control of polyA tail length and translation in vertebrate oocytes and early embryos", "GSE241107", "Other", "During oocyte maturation and early embryonic development  polyA tail lengths strongly influence mRNA translation. However  how tail lengths are controlled at different developmental stages has been unclear. Here  we performed tail length and translational profiling of mRNA reporter libraries each with > 10 million three prime UTR sequence variants in frog oocytes and embryos  and fish embryos. These analyses revealed that the UUUUA motif specifies cytoplasmic polyadenylation and identified diverse context features that modulate the activity of this 5 mer. Additional sequence motifs drive stage specific deadenylation in embryos  and UUUUA and C rich motifs drive tail length independent translational repression in oocytes. A neural network model accurately predicts tail length change during oocyte maturation in frogs  mice  and humans. Analyses of human sequence variants showed that those predicted to disrupt tail length control have been under negative selection  implying that our insights into control of polyA tail length and translation have implications for human health and fertility. Overall design: Sythetic mRNA reporter libraries with random three prime UTR sequences under four different sequence contexts were injected into frog oocytes and embryos and fish embryos. PolyA tail lengths were measured to at different developmental stages to examine sequence motifs that caused tail length changes. At the same time  polyA tail lengths of endogenous mRNAs from frog oocytes and embryos  fish embryos  and mouse oocytes were measured to investiage how their tail lengths were controlled. Please note that sample titles have been updated on Jan 6  2024.", null, null, null, "Fish embryo mRNA sphere PAL seq v4", "GSM7716869", null, "source name:embryo|tissue:embryo|treatment:N1|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing", "Fish embryo mRNA sphere PAL seq v4", "For gene specific tail seq of mRNA reporters  data were processed with a custom script available at https://github.com/coffeebond/MPRA tail seq. For PAL seq v3 or v4  reads were trimmed with cutadapt v3.7 with the parameters \u201c m 15   quality base=64  q 20 20   match read wildcards  e 0.05  a NNNNATCTCGTATGCCGTCTTCTGCTTG  O 7\u201d. The trimmed reads were mapped using STAR v2.7.1a to the reference database containing the genomic sequences of the organism from which the mRNAs were obtained  the genomic sequences of humans or fish  depending on which spike in RNAs were used  and the sequences of the polyA standards generated previously  with the parameters \u201c  runThreadN 16   runMode alignReads   outFilterMultimapNmax 1   outReadsUnmapped Fastx   outFilterType BySJout   outSAMattributes All   outSAMtype BAM Unsorted SortedByCoordinate\u201d. Uniquely mapped read were furhter processed with a custom script available at https://github.com/coffeebond/PAL seq. Assembly: Homo sapiens: GRCh38.p7 primary assembly. Mus muculus: GRCh38.p4  primary assembly. Xenopus laevis: v10.1 assembly. Danio rerio: GRCz11 assembly. Supplementary files format and content: For gene specific tail seq of mRNA reporters  tab delimited text files with columns indicating 1 sequence of the variable region; 2 median tail length; 3 number of reads; 4\u20137 tail lengths at quantile 10  25  75  and 90. Supplementary files format and content: For PAL seq v3 or v4  tab delimited files with columns indicating 1 gene ID or polyA site ID; 2 read cluster ID; 3 tail length Library strategy: PAL seq v4", "embryo", null, "Frog oocytes and embryos were lysed in ice cold buffer RL 20 mM HEPES pH 7.5  100 mM KCl  5 mM MgCl2  1% [v/v] Triton X 100  100 \u00b5g/ml cycloheximide  cOmplete protease inhibitor cocktail [1 tablet per 10 ml buffer]  and 200 units/ml SUPERase\u2022In in a volume of 10 \u00b5l per oocyte/embryo by vigorous shaking and pipetting. Lysates were cleared by centrifugation at 5000 g at 4\u00b0C for 10 min. The supernatant was transfered to a new tube and mixed with the Tri reagent for RNA isolation. Fish embryos were de chorionated by incubation with 2 mg/ml pronase in E3 medium for 4 min. post removing all E3 medium  Tri Reagent was added to the embryos for RNA isolation. Mouse GV oocytes were collected in 37\u00b0C MEM in the presence of milrinone to prevent maturation. Cumulus cells were removed from cumulus oocyte complexes by repeated aspiration through a glass pipette. GV oocytes were then collected in TRI reagent for RNA isolation. Mouse MII oocytes were harvested from the oviducts of hCG induced mice 16 hr  denuded with 3 mg/ml hyaluronidase for 2 min  washed  and then collected in Tri reagent for RNA isolation. For gene specific tail seq of reporter libraries  total RNA with reporter mRNA libraries was ligated to a pre adenylated 3\u02b9 adapter directly in most cases  but for the N60 library injected into fish embryos and frog oocytes  the N37 PAS N17 library injected into fish embryos and frog oocytes  and the CPEmos N60 and N60LC PASmos libraries injected into frog oocytes  reporter library mRNAs were enriched by anti sense oligo capture with biotinylated oligos. RNA isolated from the oocyte or embryo lysate was mixed with 8 pmol KXSH009  8 pmol KXSH010  and 2x SSC 0.3 M NaCl  30 mM sodium citrate pH 7.0 in a total of 50 \u00b5l. The RNA and oligos were annealed by incubation at 70\u00b0C for 5 min and then slowly cooling to 23\u00b0C at 0.1\u00b0C/sec. The annealed mixture was combined with 40 \u00b5l MyOne Streptavidin C1 beads Thermo Fisher  65002 and incubated for 20 min at 23\u00b0C on a thermal mixer  shaking with 15 sec on and 1 min 45 sec off. The supernatant was separated from the beads with a magnetic rack and removed. The beads were washed twice with 300 \u00b5l 1xB&W buffer 5 mM Tris HCl pH 7.5  0.5 mM EDTA  1 M NaCl and once with 300 \u00b5l 2x SSC. The RNA was eluted from the beads first with 100 \u00b5l 10 mM HEPES pH 7.5 at 65\u00b0C for 3 min and then second with 100 \u00b5l water at 65\u00b0C for 3 min. The eluates were combined  precipitated with ethanol  and resuspended in 6.5 \u00b5l water. The anti sense oligo enriched RNA or the RNA isolated from oocyte or embryo lysates was ligated to a pre adenylated 3\u02b9 adapter in a 10 \u00b5l reaction containing 5 \u00b5M 3\u02b9 adapter KXS330  50 mM HEPES pH 7.5  10 mM MgCl2  10 mM dithiothreitol  1 unit/\u00b5l T4 RNA ligase 1 New England Biolabs  M0204S. The ligation reaction was incubated at 23\u00b0C for 150 min. post ligation  RNA was extracted with phenol/chloroform  precipitated with ethanol  and resuspended in 11.4 \u00b5l water. The ligated RNA was mixed with 0.6 \u00b5l 100 \u00b5M reverse transcription primer KXS037 in a total volume of 12 \u00b5l  incubated at 65\u00b0C for 5 min  and cooled on ice for 1 min. The annealed RNA was reverse transcribed in a 20 \u00b5l reaction containing 1x First Strand Buffer  500 \u00b5M dNTPs  5 mM dithiothreitol  1 unit/\u00b5l SUPERase\u2022In  and 200 units SuperScript III Thermo Fisher  18080044 at 50\u00b0C for 1 hr. post reverse transcription  RNA was hydrolyzed with 3.3 \u00b5l 1 M NaOH at 90\u00b0C for 10 min  followed by neutralization with 36.7 \u00b5l 1 M HEPES pH 7.5 and the cDNA was collected by desalting with a Micro Bio Spin P 30 column. The cDNA library was amplified in a 50 \u00b5l PCR reaction with KXS037 and a barcoded primer Supplemental using the KAPA HiFi HotStart Kits following the manufacturer\u2019s suggested protocol for 10\u201315 cycles. The PCR amplified library was cleaned up twice with AMPure XP beads Beckman Coulter  A63881 with a beads to sample ratio of 1.2. For sequencing of endogenous mRNA polyA tail length  libraries were prepared with PAL seq v3 for frog oocytes or PAL seq v4 for frog embryos  fish embryos  and mouse oocytes as described previously PMID: 34213414. When preparing the sequencing libraries of mRNAs from fish embryos  a different 3\u02b9 adapter KXS013 was used for 3\u02b9 end ligation  and polyA selected mRNA from HeLa cells was used as spike in  replacing polyA selected mRNA from zebrafish ZF4 cell line. The first round of sequencing results suggested that a large fraction of the fish mRNA libraries was 5.8S rRNA. The cDNA of 5.8S rRNA was depleted from the cDNA libraries with an antisense oligo. The seven cDNA libraries made from mRNAs of zebrafish embryos at different stages were mixed at roughly equal molar ratios in a total of 5 fmol. Fifty pmol KXSH015 and 2x SSC were added in a total of 100 \u00b5l. The cDNAs and the oligo were annealed by incubation at 65\u00b0C for 5 min and then slowly cooling to 23\u00b0C at 0.1\u00b0C/sec. The annealed mixture was combined with 100 \u00b5l MyOne Streptavidin C1 beads and incubated for 20 min at 23\u00b0C on a thermal mixer  shaking with 15 sec on and 1 min 45 sec off. The supernatant was separated from the beads with a magnetic rack. The beads were washed once with 200 \u00b5l 1xB&W buffer. The supernatant and the wash were combined  precipitated with ethanol  and resuspended in 30 \u00b5l water. The oligo depleted libraries were sequenced again as a technical replicate. Sequencing data of replicates were merged for each sample post monitoring consistency.", null, "tissue:embryo|treatment:N1", "GSM7716869", "GSM7716869: Fish embryo mRNA sphere PAL seq v4; Danio rerio; OTHER", "GSM7716869 r1", "GSM7716869", "1", "Frog oocytes and embryos were lysed in ice cold buffer RL 20 mM HEPES pH 7.5  100 mM KCl  5 mM MgCl2  1% [v/v] Triton X 100  100 \u00b5g/ml cycloheximide  cOmplete protease inhibitor cocktail [1 tablet per 10 ml buffer]  and 200 units/ml SUPERase\u2022In in a volume of 10 \u00b5l per oocyte/embryo by vigorous shaking and pipetting. Lysates were cleared by centrifugation at 5000 g at 4\u00b0C for 10 min. The supernatant was transfered to a new tube and mixed with the Tri reagent for RNA isolation. Fish embryos were de chorionated by incubation with 2 mg/ml pronase in E3 medium for 4 min. post removing all E3 medium  Tri Reagent was added to the embryos for RNA isolation. Mouse GV oocytes were collected in 37\u00b0C MEM in the presence of milrinone to prevent maturation. Cumulus cells were removed from cumulus oocyte complexes by repeated aspiration through a glass pipette. GV oocytes were then collected in TRI reagent for RNA isolation. Mouse MII oocytes were harvested from the oviducts of hCG induced mice 16 hr  denuded with 3 mg/ml hyaluronidase for 2 min  washed  and then collected in Tri reagent for RNA isolation. For gene specific tail seq of reporter libraries  total RNA with reporter mRNA libraries was ligated to a pre adenylated 3\u02b9 adapter directly in most cases  but for the N60 library injected into fish embryos and frog oocytes  the N37 PAS N17 library injected into fish embryos and frog oocytes  and the CPEmos N60 and N60LC PASmos libraries injected into frog oocytes  reporter library mRNAs were enriched by anti sense oligo capture with biotinylated oligos. RNA isolated from the oocyte or embryo lysate was mixed with 8 pmol KXSH009  8 pmol KXSH010  and 2x SSC 0.3 M NaCl  30 mM sodium citrate pH 7.0 in a total of 50 \u00b5l. The RNA and oligos were annealed by incubation at 70\u00b0C for 5 min and then slowly cooling to 23\u00b0C at 0.1\u00b0C/sec. The annealed mixture was combined with 40 \u00b5l MyOne Streptavidin C1 beads Thermo Fisher  65002 and incubated for 20 min at 23\u00b0C on a thermal mixer  shaking with 15 sec on and 1 min 45 sec off. The supernatant was separated from the beads with a magnetic rack and removed. The beads were washed twice with 300 \u00b5l 1xB&W buffer 5 mM Tris HCl pH 7.5  0.5 mM EDTA  1 M NaCl and once with 300 \u00b5l 2x SSC. The RNA was eluted from the beads first with 100 \u00b5l 10 mM HEPES pH 7.5 at 65\u00b0C for 3 min and then second with 100 \u00b5l water at 65\u00b0C for 3 min. The eluates were combined  precipitated with ethanol  and resuspended in 6.5 \u00b5l water. The anti sense oligo enriched RNA or the RNA isolated from oocyte or embryo lysates was ligated to a pre adenylated 3\u02b9 adapter in a 10 \u00b5l reaction containing 5 \u00b5M 3\u02b9 adapter KXS330  50 mM HEPES pH 7.5  10 mM MgCl2  10 mM dithiothreitol  1 unit/\u00b5l T4 RNA ligase 1 New England Biolabs  M0204S. The ligation reaction was incubated at 23\u00b0C for 150 min. post ligation  RNA was extracted with phenol/chloroform  precipitated with ethanol  and resuspended in 11.4 \u00b5l water. The ligated RNA was mixed with 0.6 \u00b5l 100 \u00b5M reverse transcription primer KXS037 in a total volume of 12 \u00b5l  incubated at 65\u00b0C for 5 min  and cooled on ice for 1 min. The annealed RNA was reverse transcribed in a 20 \u00b5l reaction containing 1x First Strand Buffer  500 \u00b5M dNTPs  5 mM dithiothreitol  1 unit/\u00b5l SUPERase\u2022In  and 200 units SuperScript III Thermo Fisher  18080044 at 50\u00b0C for 1 hr. post reverse transcription  RNA was hydrolyzed with 3.3 \u00b5l 1 M NaOH at 90\u00b0C for 10 min  followed by neutralization with 36.7 \u00b5l 1 M HEPES pH 7.5 and the cDNA was collected by desalting with a Micro Bio Spin P 30 column. The cDNA library was amplified in a 50 \u00b5l PCR reaction with KXS037 and a barcoded primer Supplemental using the KAPA HiFi HotStart Kits following the manufacturer's suggested protocol for 10\u201315 cycles. The PCR amplified library was cleaned up twice with AMPure XP beads Beckman Coulter  A63881 with a beads to sample ratio of 1.2. For sequencing of endogenous mRNA polyA tail length  libraries were prepared with PAL seq v3 for frog oocytes or PAL seq v4 for frog embryos  fish embryos  and mouse oocytes as described previously PMID: 34213414. When preparing the sequencing libraries of mRNAs from fish embryos  a different 3\u02b9 adapter KXS013 was used for 3\u02b9 end ligation  and polyA selected mRNA from HeLa cells was used as spike in  replacing polyA selected mRNA from zebrafish ZF4 cell line. The first round of sequencing results suggested that a large fraction of the fish mRNA libraries was 5.8S rRNA. The cDNA of 5.8S rRNA was depleted from the cDNA libraries with an antisense oligo. The seven cDNA libraries made from mRNAs of zebrafish embryos at different stages were mixed at roughly equal molar ratios in a total of 5 fmol. Fifty pmol KXSH015 and 2x SSC were added in a total of 100 \u00b5l. The cDNAs and the oligo were annealed by incubation at 65\u00b0C for 5 min and then slowly cooling to 23\u00b0C at 0.1\u00b0C/sec. The annealed mixture was combined with 100 \u00b5l MyOne Streptavidin C1 beads and incubated for 20 min at 23\u00b0C on a thermal mixer  shaking with 15 sec on and 1 min 45 sec off. The supernatant was separated from the beads with a magnetic rack. The beads were washed once with 200 \u00b5l 1xB&W buffer. The supernatant and the wash were combined  precipitated with ethanol  and resuspended in 30 \u00b5l water. The oligo depleted libraries were sequenced again as a technical replicate. Sequencing data of replicates were merged for each sample post monitoring consistency.", null, "OTHER", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "Illumina HiSeq 2500", null, "SRP455680", null, null, "Fish_embryo_mRNA_sphere_PAL_seq_v4_rep1_raw_read1.fastq.gz Fish_embryo_mRNA_sphere_PAL_seq_v4_rep1_raw_read2.fastq.gz", "fastq fastq", 3211687254.0, 10461522.0, "GSM7716869 r1", "0:52 1:255", "A:813560400;C:775326762;G:854563477;T:759161458;N:9075157", 52, 255, null, null, 813560400, 775326762, 854563477, 759161458, 9075157, "SRX21396040", "SRS18636198", "SRA1694849", "Whitehead Institute", "Whitehead Institute", 2, 0.00088, 0.43191, 0.0004, 0.01556, 0.99916, 0.99961, 0.55769, 1.0, 52, 255, "T", "B", "mate1 technical by mapping diff", "illumina", "hiseq_era", "unknown", "poly_a", "unknown", "bulk", "bulk", "bulk", null, "United States", "2023-08-17", "Multi-stage", "Embryo", "Embryo Imprecise", "All anatomical structures"], [25187, "SRR25670734", "SRX21396040", "SRS18636198", "SRP455680", "PRJNA1006406", "Control of polyA tail length and translation in vertebrate oocytes and early embryos", "GSE241107", "Other", "During oocyte maturation and early embryonic development  polyA tail lengths strongly influence mRNA translation. However  how tail lengths are controlled at different developmental stages has been unclear. Here  we performed tail length and translational profiling of mRNA reporter libraries each with > 10 million three prime UTR sequence variants in frog oocytes and embryos  and fish embryos. These analyses revealed that the UUUUA motif specifies cytoplasmic polyadenylation and identified diverse context features that modulate the activity of this 5 mer. Additional sequence motifs drive stage specific deadenylation in embryos  and UUUUA and C rich motifs drive tail length independent translational repression in oocytes. A neural network model accurately predicts tail length change during oocyte maturation in frogs  mice  and humans. Analyses of human sequence variants showed that those predicted to disrupt tail length control have been under negative selection  implying that our insights into control of polyA tail length and translation have implications for human health and fertility. Overall design: Sythetic mRNA reporter libraries with random three prime UTR sequences under four different sequence contexts were injected into frog oocytes and embryos and fish embryos. PolyA tail lengths were measured to at different developmental stages to examine sequence motifs that caused tail length changes. At the same time  polyA tail lengths of endogenous mRNAs from frog oocytes and embryos  fish embryos  and mouse oocytes were measured to investiage how their tail lengths were controlled. Please note that sample titles have been updated on Jan 6  2024.", null, null, null, "Fish embryo mRNA sphere PAL seq v4", "GSM7716869", null, "source name:embryo|tissue:embryo|treatment:N1|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing", "Fish embryo mRNA sphere PAL seq v4", "For gene specific tail seq of mRNA reporters  data were processed with a custom script available at https://github.com/coffeebond/MPRA tail seq. For PAL seq v3 or v4  reads were trimmed with cutadapt v3.7 with the parameters \u201c m 15   quality base=64  q 20 20   match read wildcards  e 0.05  a NNNNATCTCGTATGCCGTCTTCTGCTTG  O 7\u201d. The trimmed reads were mapped using STAR v2.7.1a to the reference database containing the genomic sequences of the organism from which the mRNAs were obtained  the genomic sequences of humans or fish  depending on which spike in RNAs were used  and the sequences of the polyA standards generated previously  with the parameters \u201c  runThreadN 16   runMode alignReads   outFilterMultimapNmax 1   outReadsUnmapped Fastx   outFilterType BySJout   outSAMattributes All   outSAMtype BAM Unsorted SortedByCoordinate\u201d. Uniquely mapped read were furhter processed with a custom script available at https://github.com/coffeebond/PAL seq. Assembly: Homo sapiens: GRCh38.p7 primary assembly. Mus muculus: GRCh38.p4  primary assembly. Xenopus laevis: v10.1 assembly. Danio rerio: GRCz11 assembly. Supplementary files format and content: For gene specific tail seq of mRNA reporters  tab delimited text files with columns indicating 1 sequence of the variable region; 2 median tail length; 3 number of reads; 4\u20137 tail lengths at quantile 10  25  75  and 90. Supplementary files format and content: For PAL seq v3 or v4  tab delimited files with columns indicating 1 gene ID or polyA site ID; 2 read cluster ID; 3 tail length Library strategy: PAL seq v4", "embryo", null, "Frog oocytes and embryos were lysed in ice cold buffer RL 20 mM HEPES pH 7.5  100 mM KCl  5 mM MgCl2  1% [v/v] Triton X 100  100 \u00b5g/ml cycloheximide  cOmplete protease inhibitor cocktail [1 tablet per 10 ml buffer]  and 200 units/ml SUPERase\u2022In in a volume of 10 \u00b5l per oocyte/embryo by vigorous shaking and pipetting. Lysates were cleared by centrifugation at 5000 g at 4\u00b0C for 10 min. The supernatant was transfered to a new tube and mixed with the Tri reagent for RNA isolation. Fish embryos were de chorionated by incubation with 2 mg/ml pronase in E3 medium for 4 min. post removing all E3 medium  Tri Reagent was added to the embryos for RNA isolation. Mouse GV oocytes were collected in 37\u00b0C MEM in the presence of milrinone to prevent maturation. Cumulus cells were removed from cumulus oocyte complexes by repeated aspiration through a glass pipette. GV oocytes were then collected in TRI reagent for RNA isolation. Mouse MII oocytes were harvested from the oviducts of hCG induced mice 16 hr  denuded with 3 mg/ml hyaluronidase for 2 min  washed  and then collected in Tri reagent for RNA isolation. For gene specific tail seq of reporter libraries  total RNA with reporter mRNA libraries was ligated to a pre adenylated 3\u02b9 adapter directly in most cases  but for the N60 library injected into fish embryos and frog oocytes  the N37 PAS N17 library injected into fish embryos and frog oocytes  and the CPEmos N60 and N60LC PASmos libraries injected into frog oocytes  reporter library mRNAs were enriched by anti sense oligo capture with biotinylated oligos. RNA isolated from the oocyte or embryo lysate was mixed with 8 pmol KXSH009  8 pmol KXSH010  and 2x SSC 0.3 M NaCl  30 mM sodium citrate pH 7.0 in a total of 50 \u00b5l. The RNA and oligos were annealed by incubation at 70\u00b0C for 5 min and then slowly cooling to 23\u00b0C at 0.1\u00b0C/sec. The annealed mixture was combined with 40 \u00b5l MyOne Streptavidin C1 beads Thermo Fisher  65002 and incubated for 20 min at 23\u00b0C on a thermal mixer  shaking with 15 sec on and 1 min 45 sec off. The supernatant was separated from the beads with a magnetic rack and removed. The beads were washed twice with 300 \u00b5l 1xB&W buffer 5 mM Tris HCl pH 7.5  0.5 mM EDTA  1 M NaCl and once with 300 \u00b5l 2x SSC. The RNA was eluted from the beads first with 100 \u00b5l 10 mM HEPES pH 7.5 at 65\u00b0C for 3 min and then second with 100 \u00b5l water at 65\u00b0C for 3 min. The eluates were combined  precipitated with ethanol  and resuspended in 6.5 \u00b5l water. The anti sense oligo enriched RNA or the RNA isolated from oocyte or embryo lysates was ligated to a pre adenylated 3\u02b9 adapter in a 10 \u00b5l reaction containing 5 \u00b5M 3\u02b9 adapter KXS330  50 mM HEPES pH 7.5  10 mM MgCl2  10 mM dithiothreitol  1 unit/\u00b5l T4 RNA ligase 1 New England Biolabs  M0204S. The ligation reaction was incubated at 23\u00b0C for 150 min. post ligation  RNA was extracted with phenol/chloroform  precipitated with ethanol  and resuspended in 11.4 \u00b5l water. The ligated RNA was mixed with 0.6 \u00b5l 100 \u00b5M reverse transcription primer KXS037 in a total volume of 12 \u00b5l  incubated at 65\u00b0C for 5 min  and cooled on ice for 1 min. The annealed RNA was reverse transcribed in a 20 \u00b5l reaction containing 1x First Strand Buffer  500 \u00b5M dNTPs  5 mM dithiothreitol  1 unit/\u00b5l SUPERase\u2022In  and 200 units SuperScript III Thermo Fisher  18080044 at 50\u00b0C for 1 hr. post reverse transcription  RNA was hydrolyzed with 3.3 \u00b5l 1 M NaOH at 90\u00b0C for 10 min  followed by neutralization with 36.7 \u00b5l 1 M HEPES pH 7.5 and the cDNA was collected by desalting with a Micro Bio Spin P 30 column. The cDNA library was amplified in a 50 \u00b5l PCR reaction with KXS037 and a barcoded primer Supplemental using the KAPA HiFi HotStart Kits following the manufacturer\u2019s suggested protocol for 10\u201315 cycles. The PCR amplified library was cleaned up twice with AMPure XP beads Beckman Coulter  A63881 with a beads to sample ratio of 1.2. For sequencing of endogenous mRNA polyA tail length  libraries were prepared with PAL seq v3 for frog oocytes or PAL seq v4 for frog embryos  fish embryos  and mouse oocytes as described previously PMID: 34213414. When preparing the sequencing libraries of mRNAs from fish embryos  a different 3\u02b9 adapter KXS013 was used for 3\u02b9 end ligation  and polyA selected mRNA from HeLa cells was used as spike in  replacing polyA selected mRNA from zebrafish ZF4 cell line. The first round of sequencing results suggested that a large fraction of the fish mRNA libraries was 5.8S rRNA. The cDNA of 5.8S rRNA was depleted from the cDNA libraries with an antisense oligo. The seven cDNA libraries made from mRNAs of zebrafish embryos at different stages were mixed at roughly equal molar ratios in a total of 5 fmol. Fifty pmol KXSH015 and 2x SSC were added in a total of 100 \u00b5l. The cDNAs and the oligo were annealed by incubation at 65\u00b0C for 5 min and then slowly cooling to 23\u00b0C at 0.1\u00b0C/sec. The annealed mixture was combined with 100 \u00b5l MyOne Streptavidin C1 beads and incubated for 20 min at 23\u00b0C on a thermal mixer  shaking with 15 sec on and 1 min 45 sec off. The supernatant was separated from the beads with a magnetic rack. The beads were washed once with 200 \u00b5l 1xB&W buffer. The supernatant and the wash were combined  precipitated with ethanol  and resuspended in 30 \u00b5l water. The oligo depleted libraries were sequenced again as a technical replicate. Sequencing data of replicates were merged for each sample post monitoring consistency.", null, "tissue:embryo|treatment:N1", "GSM7716869", "GSM7716869: Fish embryo mRNA sphere PAL seq v4; Danio rerio; OTHER", "GSM7716869 r1", "GSM7716869", "1", "Frog oocytes and embryos were lysed in ice cold buffer RL 20 mM HEPES pH 7.5  100 mM KCl  5 mM MgCl2  1% [v/v] Triton X 100  100 \u00b5g/ml cycloheximide  cOmplete protease inhibitor cocktail [1 tablet per 10 ml buffer]  and 200 units/ml SUPERase\u2022In in a volume of 10 \u00b5l per oocyte/embryo by vigorous shaking and pipetting. Lysates were cleared by centrifugation at 5000 g at 4\u00b0C for 10 min. The supernatant was transfered to a new tube and mixed with the Tri reagent for RNA isolation. Fish embryos were de chorionated by incubation with 2 mg/ml pronase in E3 medium for 4 min. post removing all E3 medium  Tri Reagent was added to the embryos for RNA isolation. Mouse GV oocytes were collected in 37\u00b0C MEM in the presence of milrinone to prevent maturation. Cumulus cells were removed from cumulus oocyte complexes by repeated aspiration through a glass pipette. GV oocytes were then collected in TRI reagent for RNA isolation. Mouse MII oocytes were harvested from the oviducts of hCG induced mice 16 hr  denuded with 3 mg/ml hyaluronidase for 2 min  washed  and then collected in Tri reagent for RNA isolation. For gene specific tail seq of reporter libraries  total RNA with reporter mRNA libraries was ligated to a pre adenylated 3\u02b9 adapter directly in most cases  but for the N60 library injected into fish embryos and frog oocytes  the N37 PAS N17 library injected into fish embryos and frog oocytes  and the CPEmos N60 and N60LC PASmos libraries injected into frog oocytes  reporter library mRNAs were enriched by anti sense oligo capture with biotinylated oligos. RNA isolated from the oocyte or embryo lysate was mixed with 8 pmol KXSH009  8 pmol KXSH010  and 2x SSC 0.3 M NaCl  30 mM sodium citrate pH 7.0 in a total of 50 \u00b5l. The RNA and oligos were annealed by incubation at 70\u00b0C for 5 min and then slowly cooling to 23\u00b0C at 0.1\u00b0C/sec. The annealed mixture was combined with 40 \u00b5l MyOne Streptavidin C1 beads Thermo Fisher  65002 and incubated for 20 min at 23\u00b0C on a thermal mixer  shaking with 15 sec on and 1 min 45 sec off. The supernatant was separated from the beads with a magnetic rack and removed. The beads were washed twice with 300 \u00b5l 1xB&W buffer 5 mM Tris HCl pH 7.5  0.5 mM EDTA  1 M NaCl and once with 300 \u00b5l 2x SSC. The RNA was eluted from the beads first with 100 \u00b5l 10 mM HEPES pH 7.5 at 65\u00b0C for 3 min and then second with 100 \u00b5l water at 65\u00b0C for 3 min. The eluates were combined  precipitated with ethanol  and resuspended in 6.5 \u00b5l water. The anti sense oligo enriched RNA or the RNA isolated from oocyte or embryo lysates was ligated to a pre adenylated 3\u02b9 adapter in a 10 \u00b5l reaction containing 5 \u00b5M 3\u02b9 adapter KXS330  50 mM HEPES pH 7.5  10 mM MgCl2  10 mM dithiothreitol  1 unit/\u00b5l T4 RNA ligase 1 New England Biolabs  M0204S. The ligation reaction was incubated at 23\u00b0C for 150 min. post ligation  RNA was extracted with phenol/chloroform  precipitated with ethanol  and resuspended in 11.4 \u00b5l water. The ligated RNA was mixed with 0.6 \u00b5l 100 \u00b5M reverse transcription primer KXS037 in a total volume of 12 \u00b5l  incubated at 65\u00b0C for 5 min  and cooled on ice for 1 min. The annealed RNA was reverse transcribed in a 20 \u00b5l reaction containing 1x First Strand Buffer  500 \u00b5M dNTPs  5 mM dithiothreitol  1 unit/\u00b5l SUPERase\u2022In  and 200 units SuperScript III Thermo Fisher  18080044 at 50\u00b0C for 1 hr. post reverse transcription  RNA was hydrolyzed with 3.3 \u00b5l 1 M NaOH at 90\u00b0C for 10 min  followed by neutralization with 36.7 \u00b5l 1 M HEPES pH 7.5 and the cDNA was collected by desalting with a Micro Bio Spin P 30 column. The cDNA library was amplified in a 50 \u00b5l PCR reaction with KXS037 and a barcoded primer Supplemental using the KAPA HiFi HotStart Kits following the manufacturer's suggested protocol for 10\u201315 cycles. The PCR amplified library was cleaned up twice with AMPure XP beads Beckman Coulter  A63881 with a beads to sample ratio of 1.2. For sequencing of endogenous mRNA polyA tail length  libraries were prepared with PAL seq v3 for frog oocytes or PAL seq v4 for frog embryos  fish embryos  and mouse oocytes as described previously PMID: 34213414. When preparing the sequencing libraries of mRNAs from fish embryos  a different 3\u02b9 adapter KXS013 was used for 3\u02b9 end ligation  and polyA selected mRNA from HeLa cells was used as spike in  replacing polyA selected mRNA from zebrafish ZF4 cell line. The first round of sequencing results suggested that a large fraction of the fish mRNA libraries was 5.8S rRNA. The cDNA of 5.8S rRNA was depleted from the cDNA libraries with an antisense oligo. The seven cDNA libraries made from mRNAs of zebrafish embryos at different stages were mixed at roughly equal molar ratios in a total of 5 fmol. Fifty pmol KXSH015 and 2x SSC were added in a total of 100 \u00b5l. The cDNAs and the oligo were annealed by incubation at 65\u00b0C for 5 min and then slowly cooling to 23\u00b0C at 0.1\u00b0C/sec. The annealed mixture was combined with 100 \u00b5l MyOne Streptavidin C1 beads and incubated for 20 min at 23\u00b0C on a thermal mixer  shaking with 15 sec on and 1 min 45 sec off. The supernatant was separated from the beads with a magnetic rack. The beads were washed once with 200 \u00b5l 1xB&W buffer. The supernatant and the wash were combined  precipitated with ethanol  and resuspended in 30 \u00b5l water. The oligo depleted libraries were sequenced again as a technical replicate. Sequencing data of replicates were merged for each sample post monitoring consistency.", null, "OTHER", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "Illumina HiSeq 2500", null, "SRP455680", null, null, "Fish_embryo_mRNA_sphere_PAL_seq_v4_rep2_raw_read1.fastq.gz Fish_embryo_mRNA_sphere_PAL_seq_v4_rep2_raw_read2.fastq.gz", "fastq fastq", 3179916131.0, 10358033.0, "GSM7716869 r2", "0:52 1:255", "A:771755667;C:804256300;G:883166175;T:714242073;N:6495916", 52, 255, null, null, 771755667, 804256300, 883166175, 714242073, 6495916, "SRX21396040", "SRS18636198", "SRA1694849", "Whitehead Institute", "Whitehead Institute", 2, 0.00186, 0.0, 0.00088, 0.0, 0.99862, 1.0, 0.64705, null, 52, 255, "T", "T", "mates < 9% mapping rate", "illumina", "hiseq_era", "unknown", "poly_a", "unknown", "bulk", "bulk", "bulk", null, "United States", "2023-08-17", "Multi-stage", "Embryo", "Embryo Imprecise", "All anatomical structures"], [25188, "SRR25670735", "SRX21396039", "SRS18636197", "SRP455680", "PRJNA1006406", "Control of polyA tail length and translation in vertebrate oocytes and early embryos", "GSE241107", "Other", "During oocyte maturation and early embryonic development  polyA tail lengths strongly influence mRNA translation. However  how tail lengths are controlled at different developmental stages has been unclear. Here  we performed tail length and translational profiling of mRNA reporter libraries each with > 10 million three prime UTR sequence variants in frog oocytes and embryos  and fish embryos. These analyses revealed that the UUUUA motif specifies cytoplasmic polyadenylation and identified diverse context features that modulate the activity of this 5 mer. Additional sequence motifs drive stage specific deadenylation in embryos  and UUUUA and C rich motifs drive tail length independent translational repression in oocytes. A neural network model accurately predicts tail length change during oocyte maturation in frogs  mice  and humans. Analyses of human sequence variants showed that those predicted to disrupt tail length control have been under negative selection  implying that our insights into control of polyA tail length and translation have implications for human health and fertility. Overall design: Sythetic mRNA reporter libraries with random three prime UTR sequences under four different sequence contexts were injected into frog oocytes and embryos and fish embryos. PolyA tail lengths were measured to at different developmental stages to examine sequence motifs that caused tail length changes. At the same time  polyA tail lengths of endogenous mRNAs from frog oocytes and embryos  fish embryos  and mouse oocytes were measured to investiage how their tail lengths were controlled. Please note that sample titles have been updated on Jan 6  2024.", null, null, null, "Fish embryo mRNA 1024cell PAL seq v4", "GSM7716868", null, "source name:embryo|tissue:embryo|treatment:N1|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing", "Fish embryo mRNA 1024cell PAL seq v4", "For gene specific tail seq of mRNA reporters  data were processed with a custom script available at https://github.com/coffeebond/MPRA tail seq. For PAL seq v3 or v4  reads were trimmed with cutadapt v3.7 with the parameters \u201c m 15   quality base=64  q 20 20   match read wildcards  e 0.05  a NNNNATCTCGTATGCCGTCTTCTGCTTG  O 7\u201d. The trimmed reads were mapped using STAR v2.7.1a to the reference database containing the genomic sequences of the organism from which the mRNAs were obtained  the genomic sequences of humans or fish  depending on which spike in RNAs were used  and the sequences of the polyA standards generated previously  with the parameters \u201c  runThreadN 16   runMode alignReads   outFilterMultimapNmax 1   outReadsUnmapped Fastx   outFilterType BySJout   outSAMattributes All   outSAMtype BAM Unsorted SortedByCoordinate\u201d. Uniquely mapped read were furhter processed with a custom script available at https://github.com/coffeebond/PAL seq. Assembly: Homo sapiens: GRCh38.p7 primary assembly. Mus muculus: GRCh38.p4  primary assembly. Xenopus laevis: v10.1 assembly. Danio rerio: GRCz11 assembly. Supplementary files format and content: For gene specific tail seq of mRNA reporters  tab delimited text files with columns indicating 1 sequence of the variable region; 2 median tail length; 3 number of reads; 4\u20137 tail lengths at quantile 10  25  75  and 90. Supplementary files format and content: For PAL seq v3 or v4  tab delimited files with columns indicating 1 gene ID or polyA site ID; 2 read cluster ID; 3 tail length Library strategy: PAL seq v4", "embryo", null, "Frog oocytes and embryos were lysed in ice cold buffer RL 20 mM HEPES pH 7.5  100 mM KCl  5 mM MgCl2  1% [v/v] Triton X 100  100 \u00b5g/ml cycloheximide  cOmplete protease inhibitor cocktail [1 tablet per 10 ml buffer]  and 200 units/ml SUPERase\u2022In in a volume of 10 \u00b5l per oocyte/embryo by vigorous shaking and pipetting. Lysates were cleared by centrifugation at 5000 g at 4\u00b0C for 10 min. The supernatant was transfered to a new tube and mixed with the Tri reagent for RNA isolation. Fish embryos were de chorionated by incubation with 2 mg/ml pronase in E3 medium for 4 min. post removing all E3 medium  Tri Reagent was added to the embryos for RNA isolation. Mouse GV oocytes were collected in 37\u00b0C MEM in the presence of milrinone to prevent maturation. Cumulus cells were removed from cumulus oocyte complexes by repeated aspiration through a glass pipette. GV oocytes were then collected in TRI reagent for RNA isolation. Mouse MII oocytes were harvested from the oviducts of hCG induced mice 16 hr  denuded with 3 mg/ml hyaluronidase for 2 min  washed  and then collected in Tri reagent for RNA isolation. For gene specific tail seq of reporter libraries  total RNA with reporter mRNA libraries was ligated to a pre adenylated 3\u02b9 adapter directly in most cases  but for the N60 library injected into fish embryos and frog oocytes  the N37 PAS N17 library injected into fish embryos and frog oocytes  and the CPEmos N60 and N60LC PASmos libraries injected into frog oocytes  reporter library mRNAs were enriched by anti sense oligo capture with biotinylated oligos. RNA isolated from the oocyte or embryo lysate was mixed with 8 pmol KXSH009  8 pmol KXSH010  and 2x SSC 0.3 M NaCl  30 mM sodium citrate pH 7.0 in a total of 50 \u00b5l. The RNA and oligos were annealed by incubation at 70\u00b0C for 5 min and then slowly cooling to 23\u00b0C at 0.1\u00b0C/sec. The annealed mixture was combined with 40 \u00b5l MyOne Streptavidin C1 beads Thermo Fisher  65002 and incubated for 20 min at 23\u00b0C on a thermal mixer  shaking with 15 sec on and 1 min 45 sec off. The supernatant was separated from the beads with a magnetic rack and removed. The beads were washed twice with 300 \u00b5l 1xB&W buffer 5 mM Tris HCl pH 7.5  0.5 mM EDTA  1 M NaCl and once with 300 \u00b5l 2x SSC. The RNA was eluted from the beads first with 100 \u00b5l 10 mM HEPES pH 7.5 at 65\u00b0C for 3 min and then second with 100 \u00b5l water at 65\u00b0C for 3 min. The eluates were combined  precipitated with ethanol  and resuspended in 6.5 \u00b5l water. The anti sense oligo enriched RNA or the RNA isolated from oocyte or embryo lysates was ligated to a pre adenylated 3\u02b9 adapter in a 10 \u00b5l reaction containing 5 \u00b5M 3\u02b9 adapter KXS330  50 mM HEPES pH 7.5  10 mM MgCl2  10 mM dithiothreitol  1 unit/\u00b5l T4 RNA ligase 1 New England Biolabs  M0204S. The ligation reaction was incubated at 23\u00b0C for 150 min. post ligation  RNA was extracted with phenol/chloroform  precipitated with ethanol  and resuspended in 11.4 \u00b5l water. The ligated RNA was mixed with 0.6 \u00b5l 100 \u00b5M reverse transcription primer KXS037 in a total volume of 12 \u00b5l  incubated at 65\u00b0C for 5 min  and cooled on ice for 1 min. The annealed RNA was reverse transcribed in a 20 \u00b5l reaction containing 1x First Strand Buffer  500 \u00b5M dNTPs  5 mM dithiothreitol  1 unit/\u00b5l SUPERase\u2022In  and 200 units SuperScript III Thermo Fisher  18080044 at 50\u00b0C for 1 hr. post reverse transcription  RNA was hydrolyzed with 3.3 \u00b5l 1 M NaOH at 90\u00b0C for 10 min  followed by neutralization with 36.7 \u00b5l 1 M HEPES pH 7.5 and the cDNA was collected by desalting with a Micro Bio Spin P 30 column. The cDNA library was amplified in a 50 \u00b5l PCR reaction with KXS037 and a barcoded primer Supplemental using the KAPA HiFi HotStart Kits following the manufacturer\u2019s suggested protocol for 10\u201315 cycles. The PCR amplified library was cleaned up twice with AMPure XP beads Beckman Coulter  A63881 with a beads to sample ratio of 1.2. For sequencing of endogenous mRNA polyA tail length  libraries were prepared with PAL seq v3 for frog oocytes or PAL seq v4 for frog embryos  fish embryos  and mouse oocytes as described previously PMID: 34213414. When preparing the sequencing libraries of mRNAs from fish embryos  a different 3\u02b9 adapter KXS013 was used for 3\u02b9 end ligation  and polyA selected mRNA from HeLa cells was used as spike in  replacing polyA selected mRNA from zebrafish ZF4 cell line. The first round of sequencing results suggested that a large fraction of the fish mRNA libraries was 5.8S rRNA. The cDNA of 5.8S rRNA was depleted from the cDNA libraries with an antisense oligo. The seven cDNA libraries made from mRNAs of zebrafish embryos at different stages were mixed at roughly equal molar ratios in a total of 5 fmol. Fifty pmol KXSH015 and 2x SSC were added in a total of 100 \u00b5l. The cDNAs and the oligo were annealed by incubation at 65\u00b0C for 5 min and then slowly cooling to 23\u00b0C at 0.1\u00b0C/sec. The annealed mixture was combined with 100 \u00b5l MyOne Streptavidin C1 beads and incubated for 20 min at 23\u00b0C on a thermal mixer  shaking with 15 sec on and 1 min 45 sec off. The supernatant was separated from the beads with a magnetic rack. The beads were washed once with 200 \u00b5l 1xB&W buffer. The supernatant and the wash were combined  precipitated with ethanol  and resuspended in 30 \u00b5l water. The oligo depleted libraries were sequenced again as a technical replicate. Sequencing data of replicates were merged for each sample post monitoring consistency.", null, "tissue:embryo|treatment:N1", "GSM7716868", "GSM7716868: Fish embryo mRNA 1024cell PAL seq v4; Danio rerio; OTHER", "GSM7716868 r1", "GSM7716868", "1", "Frog oocytes and embryos were lysed in ice cold buffer RL 20 mM HEPES pH 7.5  100 mM KCl  5 mM MgCl2  1% [v/v] Triton X 100  100 \u00b5g/ml cycloheximide  cOmplete protease inhibitor cocktail [1 tablet per 10 ml buffer]  and 200 units/ml SUPERase\u2022In in a volume of 10 \u00b5l per oocyte/embryo by vigorous shaking and pipetting. Lysates were cleared by centrifugation at 5000 g at 4\u00b0C for 10 min. The supernatant was transfered to a new tube and mixed with the Tri reagent for RNA isolation. Fish embryos were de chorionated by incubation with 2 mg/ml pronase in E3 medium for 4 min. post removing all E3 medium  Tri Reagent was added to the embryos for RNA isolation. Mouse GV oocytes were collected in 37\u00b0C MEM in the presence of milrinone to prevent maturation. Cumulus cells were removed from cumulus oocyte complexes by repeated aspiration through a glass pipette. GV oocytes were then collected in TRI reagent for RNA isolation. Mouse MII oocytes were harvested from the oviducts of hCG induced mice 16 hr  denuded with 3 mg/ml hyaluronidase for 2 min  washed  and then collected in Tri reagent for RNA isolation. For gene specific tail seq of reporter libraries  total RNA with reporter mRNA libraries was ligated to a pre adenylated 3\u02b9 adapter directly in most cases  but for the N60 library injected into fish embryos and frog oocytes  the N37 PAS N17 library injected into fish embryos and frog oocytes  and the CPEmos N60 and N60LC PASmos libraries injected into frog oocytes  reporter library mRNAs were enriched by anti sense oligo capture with biotinylated oligos. RNA isolated from the oocyte or embryo lysate was mixed with 8 pmol KXSH009  8 pmol KXSH010  and 2x SSC 0.3 M NaCl  30 mM sodium citrate pH 7.0 in a total of 50 \u00b5l. The RNA and oligos were annealed by incubation at 70\u00b0C for 5 min and then slowly cooling to 23\u00b0C at 0.1\u00b0C/sec. The annealed mixture was combined with 40 \u00b5l MyOne Streptavidin C1 beads Thermo Fisher  65002 and incubated for 20 min at 23\u00b0C on a thermal mixer  shaking with 15 sec on and 1 min 45 sec off. The supernatant was separated from the beads with a magnetic rack and removed. The beads were washed twice with 300 \u00b5l 1xB&W buffer 5 mM Tris HCl pH 7.5  0.5 mM EDTA  1 M NaCl and once with 300 \u00b5l 2x SSC. The RNA was eluted from the beads first with 100 \u00b5l 10 mM HEPES pH 7.5 at 65\u00b0C for 3 min and then second with 100 \u00b5l water at 65\u00b0C for 3 min. The eluates were combined  precipitated with ethanol  and resuspended in 6.5 \u00b5l water. The anti sense oligo enriched RNA or the RNA isolated from oocyte or embryo lysates was ligated to a pre adenylated 3\u02b9 adapter in a 10 \u00b5l reaction containing 5 \u00b5M 3\u02b9 adapter KXS330  50 mM HEPES pH 7.5  10 mM MgCl2  10 mM dithiothreitol  1 unit/\u00b5l T4 RNA ligase 1 New England Biolabs  M0204S. The ligation reaction was incubated at 23\u00b0C for 150 min. post ligation  RNA was extracted with phenol/chloroform  precipitated with ethanol  and resuspended in 11.4 \u00b5l water. The ligated RNA was mixed with 0.6 \u00b5l 100 \u00b5M reverse transcription primer KXS037 in a total volume of 12 \u00b5l  incubated at 65\u00b0C for 5 min  and cooled on ice for 1 min. The annealed RNA was reverse transcribed in a 20 \u00b5l reaction containing 1x First Strand Buffer  500 \u00b5M dNTPs  5 mM dithiothreitol  1 unit/\u00b5l SUPERase\u2022In  and 200 units SuperScript III Thermo Fisher  18080044 at 50\u00b0C for 1 hr. post reverse transcription  RNA was hydrolyzed with 3.3 \u00b5l 1 M NaOH at 90\u00b0C for 10 min  followed by neutralization with 36.7 \u00b5l 1 M HEPES pH 7.5 and the cDNA was collected by desalting with a Micro Bio Spin P 30 column. The cDNA library was amplified in a 50 \u00b5l PCR reaction with KXS037 and a barcoded primer Supplemental using the KAPA HiFi HotStart Kits following the manufacturer's suggested protocol for 10\u201315 cycles. The PCR amplified library was cleaned up twice with AMPure XP beads Beckman Coulter  A63881 with a beads to sample ratio of 1.2. For sequencing of endogenous mRNA polyA tail length  libraries were prepared with PAL seq v3 for frog oocytes or PAL seq v4 for frog embryos  fish embryos  and mouse oocytes as described previously PMID: 34213414. When preparing the sequencing libraries of mRNAs from fish embryos  a different 3\u02b9 adapter KXS013 was used for 3\u02b9 end ligation  and polyA selected mRNA from HeLa cells was used as spike in  replacing polyA selected mRNA from zebrafish ZF4 cell line. The first round of sequencing results suggested that a large fraction of the fish mRNA libraries was 5.8S rRNA. The cDNA of 5.8S rRNA was depleted from the cDNA libraries with an antisense oligo. The seven cDNA libraries made from mRNAs of zebrafish embryos at different stages were mixed at roughly equal molar ratios in a total of 5 fmol. Fifty pmol KXSH015 and 2x SSC were added in a total of 100 \u00b5l. The cDNAs and the oligo were annealed by incubation at 65\u00b0C for 5 min and then slowly cooling to 23\u00b0C at 0.1\u00b0C/sec. The annealed mixture was combined with 100 \u00b5l MyOne Streptavidin C1 beads and incubated for 20 min at 23\u00b0C on a thermal mixer  shaking with 15 sec on and 1 min 45 sec off. The supernatant was separated from the beads with a magnetic rack. The beads were washed once with 200 \u00b5l 1xB&W buffer. The supernatant and the wash were combined  precipitated with ethanol  and resuspended in 30 \u00b5l water. The oligo depleted libraries were sequenced again as a technical replicate. Sequencing data of replicates were merged for each sample post monitoring consistency.", null, "OTHER", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "Illumina HiSeq 2500", null, "SRP455680", null, null, "Fish_embryo_mRNA_1024cell_PAL_seq_v4_rep1_raw_read1.fastq.gz Fish_embryo_mRNA_1024cell_PAL_seq_v4_rep1_raw_read2.fastq.gz", "fastq fastq", 2191900794.0, 7139742.0, "GSM7716868 r1", "0:52 1:255", "A:571954354;C:551162617;G:572445400;T:490238669;N:6099754", 52, 255, null, null, 571954354, 551162617, 572445400, 490238669, 6099754, "SRX21396039", "SRS18636197", "SRA1694849", "Whitehead Institute", "Whitehead Institute", 2, 0.0011, 0.43387, 6e-05, 0.01058, 0.99864, 0.99971, 0.74576, 1.0, 52, 255, "T", "B", "mate1 technical by mapping diff", "illumina", "hiseq_era", "unknown", "poly_a", "unknown", "bulk", "bulk", "bulk", null, "United States", "2023-08-17", "Zygote", "Embryo", "Embryo Imprecise", "All anatomical structures"], [25189, "SRR25670736", "SRX21396039", "SRS18636197", "SRP455680", "PRJNA1006406", "Control of polyA tail length and translation in vertebrate oocytes and early embryos", "GSE241107", "Other", "During oocyte maturation and early embryonic development  polyA tail lengths strongly influence mRNA translation. However  how tail lengths are controlled at different developmental stages has been unclear. Here  we performed tail length and translational profiling of mRNA reporter libraries each with > 10 million three prime UTR sequence variants in frog oocytes and embryos  and fish embryos. These analyses revealed that the UUUUA motif specifies cytoplasmic polyadenylation and identified diverse context features that modulate the activity of this 5 mer. Additional sequence motifs drive stage specific deadenylation in embryos  and UUUUA and C rich motifs drive tail length independent translational repression in oocytes. A neural network model accurately predicts tail length change during oocyte maturation in frogs  mice  and humans. Analyses of human sequence variants showed that those predicted to disrupt tail length control have been under negative selection  implying that our insights into control of polyA tail length and translation have implications for human health and fertility. Overall design: Sythetic mRNA reporter libraries with random three prime UTR sequences under four different sequence contexts were injected into frog oocytes and embryos and fish embryos. PolyA tail lengths were measured to at different developmental stages to examine sequence motifs that caused tail length changes. At the same time  polyA tail lengths of endogenous mRNAs from frog oocytes and embryos  fish embryos  and mouse oocytes were measured to investiage how their tail lengths were controlled. Please note that sample titles have been updated on Jan 6  2024.", null, null, null, "Fish embryo mRNA 1024cell PAL seq v4", "GSM7716868", null, "source name:embryo|tissue:embryo|treatment:N1|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing", "Fish embryo mRNA 1024cell PAL seq v4", "For gene specific tail seq of mRNA reporters  data were processed with a custom script available at https://github.com/coffeebond/MPRA tail seq. For PAL seq v3 or v4  reads were trimmed with cutadapt v3.7 with the parameters \u201c m 15   quality base=64  q 20 20   match read wildcards  e 0.05  a NNNNATCTCGTATGCCGTCTTCTGCTTG  O 7\u201d. The trimmed reads were mapped using STAR v2.7.1a to the reference database containing the genomic sequences of the organism from which the mRNAs were obtained  the genomic sequences of humans or fish  depending on which spike in RNAs were used  and the sequences of the polyA standards generated previously  with the parameters \u201c  runThreadN 16   runMode alignReads   outFilterMultimapNmax 1   outReadsUnmapped Fastx   outFilterType BySJout   outSAMattributes All   outSAMtype BAM Unsorted SortedByCoordinate\u201d. Uniquely mapped read were furhter processed with a custom script available at https://github.com/coffeebond/PAL seq. Assembly: Homo sapiens: GRCh38.p7 primary assembly. Mus muculus: GRCh38.p4  primary assembly. Xenopus laevis: v10.1 assembly. Danio rerio: GRCz11 assembly. Supplementary files format and content: For gene specific tail seq of mRNA reporters  tab delimited text files with columns indicating 1 sequence of the variable region; 2 median tail length; 3 number of reads; 4\u20137 tail lengths at quantile 10  25  75  and 90. Supplementary files format and content: For PAL seq v3 or v4  tab delimited files with columns indicating 1 gene ID or polyA site ID; 2 read cluster ID; 3 tail length Library strategy: PAL seq v4", "embryo", null, "Frog oocytes and embryos were lysed in ice cold buffer RL 20 mM HEPES pH 7.5  100 mM KCl  5 mM MgCl2  1% [v/v] Triton X 100  100 \u00b5g/ml cycloheximide  cOmplete protease inhibitor cocktail [1 tablet per 10 ml buffer]  and 200 units/ml SUPERase\u2022In in a volume of 10 \u00b5l per oocyte/embryo by vigorous shaking and pipetting. Lysates were cleared by centrifugation at 5000 g at 4\u00b0C for 10 min. The supernatant was transfered to a new tube and mixed with the Tri reagent for RNA isolation. Fish embryos were de chorionated by incubation with 2 mg/ml pronase in E3 medium for 4 min. post removing all E3 medium  Tri Reagent was added to the embryos for RNA isolation. Mouse GV oocytes were collected in 37\u00b0C MEM in the presence of milrinone to prevent maturation. Cumulus cells were removed from cumulus oocyte complexes by repeated aspiration through a glass pipette. GV oocytes were then collected in TRI reagent for RNA isolation. Mouse MII oocytes were harvested from the oviducts of hCG induced mice 16 hr  denuded with 3 mg/ml hyaluronidase for 2 min  washed  and then collected in Tri reagent for RNA isolation. For gene specific tail seq of reporter libraries  total RNA with reporter mRNA libraries was ligated to a pre adenylated 3\u02b9 adapter directly in most cases  but for the N60 library injected into fish embryos and frog oocytes  the N37 PAS N17 library injected into fish embryos and frog oocytes  and the CPEmos N60 and N60LC PASmos libraries injected into frog oocytes  reporter library mRNAs were enriched by anti sense oligo capture with biotinylated oligos. RNA isolated from the oocyte or embryo lysate was mixed with 8 pmol KXSH009  8 pmol KXSH010  and 2x SSC 0.3 M NaCl  30 mM sodium citrate pH 7.0 in a total of 50 \u00b5l. The RNA and oligos were annealed by incubation at 70\u00b0C for 5 min and then slowly cooling to 23\u00b0C at 0.1\u00b0C/sec. The annealed mixture was combined with 40 \u00b5l MyOne Streptavidin C1 beads Thermo Fisher  65002 and incubated for 20 min at 23\u00b0C on a thermal mixer  shaking with 15 sec on and 1 min 45 sec off. The supernatant was separated from the beads with a magnetic rack and removed. The beads were washed twice with 300 \u00b5l 1xB&W buffer 5 mM Tris HCl pH 7.5  0.5 mM EDTA  1 M NaCl and once with 300 \u00b5l 2x SSC. The RNA was eluted from the beads first with 100 \u00b5l 10 mM HEPES pH 7.5 at 65\u00b0C for 3 min and then second with 100 \u00b5l water at 65\u00b0C for 3 min. The eluates were combined  precipitated with ethanol  and resuspended in 6.5 \u00b5l water. The anti sense oligo enriched RNA or the RNA isolated from oocyte or embryo lysates was ligated to a pre adenylated 3\u02b9 adapter in a 10 \u00b5l reaction containing 5 \u00b5M 3\u02b9 adapter KXS330  50 mM HEPES pH 7.5  10 mM MgCl2  10 mM dithiothreitol  1 unit/\u00b5l T4 RNA ligase 1 New England Biolabs  M0204S. The ligation reaction was incubated at 23\u00b0C for 150 min. post ligation  RNA was extracted with phenol/chloroform  precipitated with ethanol  and resuspended in 11.4 \u00b5l water. The ligated RNA was mixed with 0.6 \u00b5l 100 \u00b5M reverse transcription primer KXS037 in a total volume of 12 \u00b5l  incubated at 65\u00b0C for 5 min  and cooled on ice for 1 min. The annealed RNA was reverse transcribed in a 20 \u00b5l reaction containing 1x First Strand Buffer  500 \u00b5M dNTPs  5 mM dithiothreitol  1 unit/\u00b5l SUPERase\u2022In  and 200 units SuperScript III Thermo Fisher  18080044 at 50\u00b0C for 1 hr. post reverse transcription  RNA was hydrolyzed with 3.3 \u00b5l 1 M NaOH at 90\u00b0C for 10 min  followed by neutralization with 36.7 \u00b5l 1 M HEPES pH 7.5 and the cDNA was collected by desalting with a Micro Bio Spin P 30 column. The cDNA library was amplified in a 50 \u00b5l PCR reaction with KXS037 and a barcoded primer Supplemental using the KAPA HiFi HotStart Kits following the manufacturer\u2019s suggested protocol for 10\u201315 cycles. The PCR amplified library was cleaned up twice with AMPure XP beads Beckman Coulter  A63881 with a beads to sample ratio of 1.2. For sequencing of endogenous mRNA polyA tail length  libraries were prepared with PAL seq v3 for frog oocytes or PAL seq v4 for frog embryos  fish embryos  and mouse oocytes as described previously PMID: 34213414. When preparing the sequencing libraries of mRNAs from fish embryos  a different 3\u02b9 adapter KXS013 was used for 3\u02b9 end ligation  and polyA selected mRNA from HeLa cells was used as spike in  replacing polyA selected mRNA from zebrafish ZF4 cell line. The first round of sequencing results suggested that a large fraction of the fish mRNA libraries was 5.8S rRNA. The cDNA of 5.8S rRNA was depleted from the cDNA libraries with an antisense oligo. The seven cDNA libraries made from mRNAs of zebrafish embryos at different stages were mixed at roughly equal molar ratios in a total of 5 fmol. Fifty pmol KXSH015 and 2x SSC were added in a total of 100 \u00b5l. The cDNAs and the oligo were annealed by incubation at 65\u00b0C for 5 min and then slowly cooling to 23\u00b0C at 0.1\u00b0C/sec. The annealed mixture was combined with 100 \u00b5l MyOne Streptavidin C1 beads and incubated for 20 min at 23\u00b0C on a thermal mixer  shaking with 15 sec on and 1 min 45 sec off. The supernatant was separated from the beads with a magnetic rack. The beads were washed once with 200 \u00b5l 1xB&W buffer. The supernatant and the wash were combined  precipitated with ethanol  and resuspended in 30 \u00b5l water. The oligo depleted libraries were sequenced again as a technical replicate. Sequencing data of replicates were merged for each sample post monitoring consistency.", null, "tissue:embryo|treatment:N1", "GSM7716868", "GSM7716868: Fish embryo mRNA 1024cell PAL seq v4; Danio rerio; OTHER", "GSM7716868 r1", "GSM7716868", "1", "Frog oocytes and embryos were lysed in ice cold buffer RL 20 mM HEPES pH 7.5  100 mM KCl  5 mM MgCl2  1% [v/v] Triton X 100  100 \u00b5g/ml cycloheximide  cOmplete protease inhibitor cocktail [1 tablet per 10 ml buffer]  and 200 units/ml SUPERase\u2022In in a volume of 10 \u00b5l per oocyte/embryo by vigorous shaking and pipetting. Lysates were cleared by centrifugation at 5000 g at 4\u00b0C for 10 min. The supernatant was transfered to a new tube and mixed with the Tri reagent for RNA isolation. Fish embryos were de chorionated by incubation with 2 mg/ml pronase in E3 medium for 4 min. post removing all E3 medium  Tri Reagent was added to the embryos for RNA isolation. Mouse GV oocytes were collected in 37\u00b0C MEM in the presence of milrinone to prevent maturation. Cumulus cells were removed from cumulus oocyte complexes by repeated aspiration through a glass pipette. GV oocytes were then collected in TRI reagent for RNA isolation. Mouse MII oocytes were harvested from the oviducts of hCG induced mice 16 hr  denuded with 3 mg/ml hyaluronidase for 2 min  washed  and then collected in Tri reagent for RNA isolation. For gene specific tail seq of reporter libraries  total RNA with reporter mRNA libraries was ligated to a pre adenylated 3\u02b9 adapter directly in most cases  but for the N60 library injected into fish embryos and frog oocytes  the N37 PAS N17 library injected into fish embryos and frog oocytes  and the CPEmos N60 and N60LC PASmos libraries injected into frog oocytes  reporter library mRNAs were enriched by anti sense oligo capture with biotinylated oligos. RNA isolated from the oocyte or embryo lysate was mixed with 8 pmol KXSH009  8 pmol KXSH010  and 2x SSC 0.3 M NaCl  30 mM sodium citrate pH 7.0 in a total of 50 \u00b5l. The RNA and oligos were annealed by incubation at 70\u00b0C for 5 min and then slowly cooling to 23\u00b0C at 0.1\u00b0C/sec. The annealed mixture was combined with 40 \u00b5l MyOne Streptavidin C1 beads Thermo Fisher  65002 and incubated for 20 min at 23\u00b0C on a thermal mixer  shaking with 15 sec on and 1 min 45 sec off. The supernatant was separated from the beads with a magnetic rack and removed. The beads were washed twice with 300 \u00b5l 1xB&W buffer 5 mM Tris HCl pH 7.5  0.5 mM EDTA  1 M NaCl and once with 300 \u00b5l 2x SSC. The RNA was eluted from the beads first with 100 \u00b5l 10 mM HEPES pH 7.5 at 65\u00b0C for 3 min and then second with 100 \u00b5l water at 65\u00b0C for 3 min. The eluates were combined  precipitated with ethanol  and resuspended in 6.5 \u00b5l water. The anti sense oligo enriched RNA or the RNA isolated from oocyte or embryo lysates was ligated to a pre adenylated 3\u02b9 adapter in a 10 \u00b5l reaction containing 5 \u00b5M 3\u02b9 adapter KXS330  50 mM HEPES pH 7.5  10 mM MgCl2  10 mM dithiothreitol  1 unit/\u00b5l T4 RNA ligase 1 New England Biolabs  M0204S. The ligation reaction was incubated at 23\u00b0C for 150 min. post ligation  RNA was extracted with phenol/chloroform  precipitated with ethanol  and resuspended in 11.4 \u00b5l water. The ligated RNA was mixed with 0.6 \u00b5l 100 \u00b5M reverse transcription primer KXS037 in a total volume of 12 \u00b5l  incubated at 65\u00b0C for 5 min  and cooled on ice for 1 min. The annealed RNA was reverse transcribed in a 20 \u00b5l reaction containing 1x First Strand Buffer  500 \u00b5M dNTPs  5 mM dithiothreitol  1 unit/\u00b5l SUPERase\u2022In  and 200 units SuperScript III Thermo Fisher  18080044 at 50\u00b0C for 1 hr. post reverse transcription  RNA was hydrolyzed with 3.3 \u00b5l 1 M NaOH at 90\u00b0C for 10 min  followed by neutralization with 36.7 \u00b5l 1 M HEPES pH 7.5 and the cDNA was collected by desalting with a Micro Bio Spin P 30 column. The cDNA library was amplified in a 50 \u00b5l PCR reaction with KXS037 and a barcoded primer Supplemental using the KAPA HiFi HotStart Kits following the manufacturer's suggested protocol for 10\u201315 cycles. The PCR amplified library was cleaned up twice with AMPure XP beads Beckman Coulter  A63881 with a beads to sample ratio of 1.2. For sequencing of endogenous mRNA polyA tail length  libraries were prepared with PAL seq v3 for frog oocytes or PAL seq v4 for frog embryos  fish embryos  and mouse oocytes as described previously PMID: 34213414. When preparing the sequencing libraries of mRNAs from fish embryos  a different 3\u02b9 adapter KXS013 was used for 3\u02b9 end ligation  and polyA selected mRNA from HeLa cells was used as spike in  replacing polyA selected mRNA from zebrafish ZF4 cell line. The first round of sequencing results suggested that a large fraction of the fish mRNA libraries was 5.8S rRNA. The cDNA of 5.8S rRNA was depleted from the cDNA libraries with an antisense oligo. The seven cDNA libraries made from mRNAs of zebrafish embryos at different stages were mixed at roughly equal molar ratios in a total of 5 fmol. Fifty pmol KXSH015 and 2x SSC were added in a total of 100 \u00b5l. The cDNAs and the oligo were annealed by incubation at 65\u00b0C for 5 min and then slowly cooling to 23\u00b0C at 0.1\u00b0C/sec. The annealed mixture was combined with 100 \u00b5l MyOne Streptavidin C1 beads and incubated for 20 min at 23\u00b0C on a thermal mixer  shaking with 15 sec on and 1 min 45 sec off. The supernatant was separated from the beads with a magnetic rack. The beads were washed once with 200 \u00b5l 1xB&W buffer. The supernatant and the wash were combined  precipitated with ethanol  and resuspended in 30 \u00b5l water. The oligo depleted libraries were sequenced again as a technical replicate. Sequencing data of replicates were merged for each sample post monitoring consistency.", null, "OTHER", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "Illumina HiSeq 2500", null, "SRP455680", null, null, "Fish_embryo_mRNA_1024cell_PAL_seq_v4_rep2_raw_read1.fastq.gz Fish_embryo_mRNA_1024cell_PAL_seq_v4_rep2_raw_read2.fastq.gz", "fastq fastq", 3840723193.0, 12510499.0, "GSM7716868 r2", "0:52 1:255", "A:985340216;C:991311706;G:1034487140;T:821820974;N:7763157", 52, 255, null, null, 985340216, 991311706, 1034487140, 821820974, 7763157, "SRX21396039", "SRS18636197", "SRA1694849", "Whitehead Institute", "Whitehead Institute", 2, 0.0021, 0.0, 0.00026, 0.0, 0.99859, 1.0, 0.71022, null, 52, 255, "T", "T", "mates < 9% mapping rate", "illumina", "hiseq_era", "unknown", "poly_a", "unknown", "bulk", "bulk", "bulk", null, "United States", "2023-08-17", "Zygote", "Embryo", "Embryo Imprecise", "All anatomical structures"], [25190, "SRR25670737", "SRX21396038", "SRS18636196", "SRP455680", "PRJNA1006406", "Control of polyA tail length and translation in vertebrate oocytes and early embryos", "GSE241107", "Other", "During oocyte maturation and early embryonic development  polyA tail lengths strongly influence mRNA translation. However  how tail lengths are controlled at different developmental stages has been unclear. Here  we performed tail length and translational profiling of mRNA reporter libraries each with > 10 million three prime UTR sequence variants in frog oocytes and embryos  and fish embryos. These analyses revealed that the UUUUA motif specifies cytoplasmic polyadenylation and identified diverse context features that modulate the activity of this 5 mer. Additional sequence motifs drive stage specific deadenylation in embryos  and UUUUA and C rich motifs drive tail length independent translational repression in oocytes. A neural network model accurately predicts tail length change during oocyte maturation in frogs  mice  and humans. Analyses of human sequence variants showed that those predicted to disrupt tail length control have been under negative selection  implying that our insights into control of polyA tail length and translation have implications for human health and fertility. Overall design: Sythetic mRNA reporter libraries with random three prime UTR sequences under four different sequence contexts were injected into frog oocytes and embryos and fish embryos. PolyA tail lengths were measured to at different developmental stages to examine sequence motifs that caused tail length changes. At the same time  polyA tail lengths of endogenous mRNAs from frog oocytes and embryos  fish embryos  and mouse oocytes were measured to investiage how their tail lengths were controlled. Please note that sample titles have been updated on Jan 6  2024.", null, null, null, "Fish embryo mRNA 128cell PAL seq v4", "GSM7716867", null, "source name:embryo|tissue:embryo|treatment:N1|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing", "Fish embryo mRNA 128cell PAL seq v4", "For gene specific tail seq of mRNA reporters  data were processed with a custom script available at https://github.com/coffeebond/MPRA tail seq. For PAL seq v3 or v4  reads were trimmed with cutadapt v3.7 with the parameters \u201c m 15   quality base=64  q 20 20   match read wildcards  e 0.05  a NNNNATCTCGTATGCCGTCTTCTGCTTG  O 7\u201d. The trimmed reads were mapped using STAR v2.7.1a to the reference database containing the genomic sequences of the organism from which the mRNAs were obtained  the genomic sequences of humans or fish  depending on which spike in RNAs were used  and the sequences of the polyA standards generated previously  with the parameters \u201c  runThreadN 16   runMode alignReads   outFilterMultimapNmax 1   outReadsUnmapped Fastx   outFilterType BySJout   outSAMattributes All   outSAMtype BAM Unsorted SortedByCoordinate\u201d. Uniquely mapped read were furhter processed with a custom script available at https://github.com/coffeebond/PAL seq. Assembly: Homo sapiens: GRCh38.p7 primary assembly. Mus muculus: GRCh38.p4  primary assembly. Xenopus laevis: v10.1 assembly. Danio rerio: GRCz11 assembly. Supplementary files format and content: For gene specific tail seq of mRNA reporters  tab delimited text files with columns indicating 1 sequence of the variable region; 2 median tail length; 3 number of reads; 4\u20137 tail lengths at quantile 10  25  75  and 90. Supplementary files format and content: For PAL seq v3 or v4  tab delimited files with columns indicating 1 gene ID or polyA site ID; 2 read cluster ID; 3 tail length Library strategy: PAL seq v4", "embryo", null, "Frog oocytes and embryos were lysed in ice cold buffer RL 20 mM HEPES pH 7.5  100 mM KCl  5 mM MgCl2  1% [v/v] Triton X 100  100 \u00b5g/ml cycloheximide  cOmplete protease inhibitor cocktail [1 tablet per 10 ml buffer]  and 200 units/ml SUPERase\u2022In in a volume of 10 \u00b5l per oocyte/embryo by vigorous shaking and pipetting. Lysates were cleared by centrifugation at 5000 g at 4\u00b0C for 10 min. The supernatant was transfered to a new tube and mixed with the Tri reagent for RNA isolation. Fish embryos were de chorionated by incubation with 2 mg/ml pronase in E3 medium for 4 min. post removing all E3 medium  Tri Reagent was added to the embryos for RNA isolation. Mouse GV oocytes were collected in 37\u00b0C MEM in the presence of milrinone to prevent maturation. Cumulus cells were removed from cumulus oocyte complexes by repeated aspiration through a glass pipette. GV oocytes were then collected in TRI reagent for RNA isolation. Mouse MII oocytes were harvested from the oviducts of hCG induced mice 16 hr  denuded with 3 mg/ml hyaluronidase for 2 min  washed  and then collected in Tri reagent for RNA isolation. For gene specific tail seq of reporter libraries  total RNA with reporter mRNA libraries was ligated to a pre adenylated 3\u02b9 adapter directly in most cases  but for the N60 library injected into fish embryos and frog oocytes  the N37 PAS N17 library injected into fish embryos and frog oocytes  and the CPEmos N60 and N60LC PASmos libraries injected into frog oocytes  reporter library mRNAs were enriched by anti sense oligo capture with biotinylated oligos. RNA isolated from the oocyte or embryo lysate was mixed with 8 pmol KXSH009  8 pmol KXSH010  and 2x SSC 0.3 M NaCl  30 mM sodium citrate pH 7.0 in a total of 50 \u00b5l. The RNA and oligos were annealed by incubation at 70\u00b0C for 5 min and then slowly cooling to 23\u00b0C at 0.1\u00b0C/sec. The annealed mixture was combined with 40 \u00b5l MyOne Streptavidin C1 beads Thermo Fisher  65002 and incubated for 20 min at 23\u00b0C on a thermal mixer  shaking with 15 sec on and 1 min 45 sec off. The supernatant was separated from the beads with a magnetic rack and removed. The beads were washed twice with 300 \u00b5l 1xB&W buffer 5 mM Tris HCl pH 7.5  0.5 mM EDTA  1 M NaCl and once with 300 \u00b5l 2x SSC. The RNA was eluted from the beads first with 100 \u00b5l 10 mM HEPES pH 7.5 at 65\u00b0C for 3 min and then second with 100 \u00b5l water at 65\u00b0C for 3 min. The eluates were combined  precipitated with ethanol  and resuspended in 6.5 \u00b5l water. The anti sense oligo enriched RNA or the RNA isolated from oocyte or embryo lysates was ligated to a pre adenylated 3\u02b9 adapter in a 10 \u00b5l reaction containing 5 \u00b5M 3\u02b9 adapter KXS330  50 mM HEPES pH 7.5  10 mM MgCl2  10 mM dithiothreitol  1 unit/\u00b5l T4 RNA ligase 1 New England Biolabs  M0204S. The ligation reaction was incubated at 23\u00b0C for 150 min. post ligation  RNA was extracted with phenol/chloroform  precipitated with ethanol  and resuspended in 11.4 \u00b5l water. The ligated RNA was mixed with 0.6 \u00b5l 100 \u00b5M reverse transcription primer KXS037 in a total volume of 12 \u00b5l  incubated at 65\u00b0C for 5 min  and cooled on ice for 1 min. The annealed RNA was reverse transcribed in a 20 \u00b5l reaction containing 1x First Strand Buffer  500 \u00b5M dNTPs  5 mM dithiothreitol  1 unit/\u00b5l SUPERase\u2022In  and 200 units SuperScript III Thermo Fisher  18080044 at 50\u00b0C for 1 hr. post reverse transcription  RNA was hydrolyzed with 3.3 \u00b5l 1 M NaOH at 90\u00b0C for 10 min  followed by neutralization with 36.7 \u00b5l 1 M HEPES pH 7.5 and the cDNA was collected by desalting with a Micro Bio Spin P 30 column. The cDNA library was amplified in a 50 \u00b5l PCR reaction with KXS037 and a barcoded primer Supplemental using the KAPA HiFi HotStart Kits following the manufacturer\u2019s suggested protocol for 10\u201315 cycles. The PCR amplified library was cleaned up twice with AMPure XP beads Beckman Coulter  A63881 with a beads to sample ratio of 1.2. For sequencing of endogenous mRNA polyA tail length  libraries were prepared with PAL seq v3 for frog oocytes or PAL seq v4 for frog embryos  fish embryos  and mouse oocytes as described previously PMID: 34213414. When preparing the sequencing libraries of mRNAs from fish embryos  a different 3\u02b9 adapter KXS013 was used for 3\u02b9 end ligation  and polyA selected mRNA from HeLa cells was used as spike in  replacing polyA selected mRNA from zebrafish ZF4 cell line. The first round of sequencing results suggested that a large fraction of the fish mRNA libraries was 5.8S rRNA. The cDNA of 5.8S rRNA was depleted from the cDNA libraries with an antisense oligo. The seven cDNA libraries made from mRNAs of zebrafish embryos at different stages were mixed at roughly equal molar ratios in a total of 5 fmol. Fifty pmol KXSH015 and 2x SSC were added in a total of 100 \u00b5l. The cDNAs and the oligo were annealed by incubation at 65\u00b0C for 5 min and then slowly cooling to 23\u00b0C at 0.1\u00b0C/sec. The annealed mixture was combined with 100 \u00b5l MyOne Streptavidin C1 beads and incubated for 20 min at 23\u00b0C on a thermal mixer  shaking with 15 sec on and 1 min 45 sec off. The supernatant was separated from the beads with a magnetic rack. The beads were washed once with 200 \u00b5l 1xB&W buffer. The supernatant and the wash were combined  precipitated with ethanol  and resuspended in 30 \u00b5l water. The oligo depleted libraries were sequenced again as a technical replicate. Sequencing data of replicates were merged for each sample post monitoring consistency.", null, "tissue:embryo|treatment:N1", "GSM7716867", "GSM7716867: Fish embryo mRNA 128cell PAL seq v4; Danio rerio; OTHER", "GSM7716867 r1", "GSM7716867", "1", "Frog oocytes and embryos were lysed in ice cold buffer RL 20 mM HEPES pH 7.5  100 mM KCl  5 mM MgCl2  1% [v/v] Triton X 100  100 \u00b5g/ml cycloheximide  cOmplete protease inhibitor cocktail [1 tablet per 10 ml buffer]  and 200 units/ml SUPERase\u2022In in a volume of 10 \u00b5l per oocyte/embryo by vigorous shaking and pipetting. Lysates were cleared by centrifugation at 5000 g at 4\u00b0C for 10 min. The supernatant was transfered to a new tube and mixed with the Tri reagent for RNA isolation. Fish embryos were de chorionated by incubation with 2 mg/ml pronase in E3 medium for 4 min. post removing all E3 medium  Tri Reagent was added to the embryos for RNA isolation. Mouse GV oocytes were collected in 37\u00b0C MEM in the presence of milrinone to prevent maturation. Cumulus cells were removed from cumulus oocyte complexes by repeated aspiration through a glass pipette. GV oocytes were then collected in TRI reagent for RNA isolation. Mouse MII oocytes were harvested from the oviducts of hCG induced mice 16 hr  denuded with 3 mg/ml hyaluronidase for 2 min  washed  and then collected in Tri reagent for RNA isolation. For gene specific tail seq of reporter libraries  total RNA with reporter mRNA libraries was ligated to a pre adenylated 3\u02b9 adapter directly in most cases  but for the N60 library injected into fish embryos and frog oocytes  the N37 PAS N17 library injected into fish embryos and frog oocytes  and the CPEmos N60 and N60LC PASmos libraries injected into frog oocytes  reporter library mRNAs were enriched by anti sense oligo capture with biotinylated oligos. RNA isolated from the oocyte or embryo lysate was mixed with 8 pmol KXSH009  8 pmol KXSH010  and 2x SSC 0.3 M NaCl  30 mM sodium citrate pH 7.0 in a total of 50 \u00b5l. The RNA and oligos were annealed by incubation at 70\u00b0C for 5 min and then slowly cooling to 23\u00b0C at 0.1\u00b0C/sec. The annealed mixture was combined with 40 \u00b5l MyOne Streptavidin C1 beads Thermo Fisher  65002 and incubated for 20 min at 23\u00b0C on a thermal mixer  shaking with 15 sec on and 1 min 45 sec off. The supernatant was separated from the beads with a magnetic rack and removed. The beads were washed twice with 300 \u00b5l 1xB&W buffer 5 mM Tris HCl pH 7.5  0.5 mM EDTA  1 M NaCl and once with 300 \u00b5l 2x SSC. The RNA was eluted from the beads first with 100 \u00b5l 10 mM HEPES pH 7.5 at 65\u00b0C for 3 min and then second with 100 \u00b5l water at 65\u00b0C for 3 min. The eluates were combined  precipitated with ethanol  and resuspended in 6.5 \u00b5l water. The anti sense oligo enriched RNA or the RNA isolated from oocyte or embryo lysates was ligated to a pre adenylated 3\u02b9 adapter in a 10 \u00b5l reaction containing 5 \u00b5M 3\u02b9 adapter KXS330  50 mM HEPES pH 7.5  10 mM MgCl2  10 mM dithiothreitol  1 unit/\u00b5l T4 RNA ligase 1 New England Biolabs  M0204S. The ligation reaction was incubated at 23\u00b0C for 150 min. post ligation  RNA was extracted with phenol/chloroform  precipitated with ethanol  and resuspended in 11.4 \u00b5l water. The ligated RNA was mixed with 0.6 \u00b5l 100 \u00b5M reverse transcription primer KXS037 in a total volume of 12 \u00b5l  incubated at 65\u00b0C for 5 min  and cooled on ice for 1 min. The annealed RNA was reverse transcribed in a 20 \u00b5l reaction containing 1x First Strand Buffer  500 \u00b5M dNTPs  5 mM dithiothreitol  1 unit/\u00b5l SUPERase\u2022In  and 200 units SuperScript III Thermo Fisher  18080044 at 50\u00b0C for 1 hr. post reverse transcription  RNA was hydrolyzed with 3.3 \u00b5l 1 M NaOH at 90\u00b0C for 10 min  followed by neutralization with 36.7 \u00b5l 1 M HEPES pH 7.5 and the cDNA was collected by desalting with a Micro Bio Spin P 30 column. The cDNA library was amplified in a 50 \u00b5l PCR reaction with KXS037 and a barcoded primer Supplemental using the KAPA HiFi HotStart Kits following the manufacturer's suggested protocol for 10\u201315 cycles. The PCR amplified library was cleaned up twice with AMPure XP beads Beckman Coulter  A63881 with a beads to sample ratio of 1.2. For sequencing of endogenous mRNA polyA tail length  libraries were prepared with PAL seq v3 for frog oocytes or PAL seq v4 for frog embryos  fish embryos  and mouse oocytes as described previously PMID: 34213414. When preparing the sequencing libraries of mRNAs from fish embryos  a different 3\u02b9 adapter KXS013 was used for 3\u02b9 end ligation  and polyA selected mRNA from HeLa cells was used as spike in  replacing polyA selected mRNA from zebrafish ZF4 cell line. The first round of sequencing results suggested that a large fraction of the fish mRNA libraries was 5.8S rRNA. The cDNA of 5.8S rRNA was depleted from the cDNA libraries with an antisense oligo. The seven cDNA libraries made from mRNAs of zebrafish embryos at different stages were mixed at roughly equal molar ratios in a total of 5 fmol. Fifty pmol KXSH015 and 2x SSC were added in a total of 100 \u00b5l. The cDNAs and the oligo were annealed by incubation at 65\u00b0C for 5 min and then slowly cooling to 23\u00b0C at 0.1\u00b0C/sec. The annealed mixture was combined with 100 \u00b5l MyOne Streptavidin C1 beads and incubated for 20 min at 23\u00b0C on a thermal mixer  shaking with 15 sec on and 1 min 45 sec off. The supernatant was separated from the beads with a magnetic rack. The beads were washed once with 200 \u00b5l 1xB&W buffer. The supernatant and the wash were combined  precipitated with ethanol  and resuspended in 30 \u00b5l water. The oligo depleted libraries were sequenced again as a technical replicate. Sequencing data of replicates were merged for each sample post monitoring consistency.", null, "OTHER", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "Illumina HiSeq 2500", null, "SRP455680", null, null, "Fish_embryo_mRNA_128cell_PAL_seq_v4_rep1_raw_read1.fastq.gz Fish_embryo_mRNA_128cell_PAL_seq_v4_rep1_raw_read2.fastq.gz", "fastq fastq", 2104868443.0, 6856249.0, "GSM7716867 r1", "0:52 1:255", "A:539122676;C:505234642;G:558793048;T:495876292;N:5841785", 52, 255, null, null, 539122676, 505234642, 558793048, 495876292, 5841785, "SRX21396038", "SRS18636196", "SRA1694849", "Whitehead Institute", "Whitehead Institute", 2, 0.00035, 0.29379, 7e-05, 0.01129, 0.99949, 0.99971, 0.55882, 0.79591, 52, 255, "T", "B", "mate1 technical by mapping diff", "illumina", "hiseq_era", "unknown", "poly_a", "unknown", "bulk", "bulk", "bulk", null, "United States", "2023-08-17", "Multi-stage", "Embryo", "Embryo Imprecise", "All anatomical structures"], [25191, "SRR25670738", "SRX21396038", "SRS18636196", "SRP455680", "PRJNA1006406", "Control of polyA tail length and translation in vertebrate oocytes and early embryos", "GSE241107", "Other", "During oocyte maturation and early embryonic development  polyA tail lengths strongly influence mRNA translation. However  how tail lengths are controlled at different developmental stages has been unclear. Here  we performed tail length and translational profiling of mRNA reporter libraries each with > 10 million three prime UTR sequence variants in frog oocytes and embryos  and fish embryos. These analyses revealed that the UUUUA motif specifies cytoplasmic polyadenylation and identified diverse context features that modulate the activity of this 5 mer. Additional sequence motifs drive stage specific deadenylation in embryos  and UUUUA and C rich motifs drive tail length independent translational repression in oocytes. A neural network model accurately predicts tail length change during oocyte maturation in frogs  mice  and humans. Analyses of human sequence variants showed that those predicted to disrupt tail length control have been under negative selection  implying that our insights into control of polyA tail length and translation have implications for human health and fertility. Overall design: Sythetic mRNA reporter libraries with random three prime UTR sequences under four different sequence contexts were injected into frog oocytes and embryos and fish embryos. PolyA tail lengths were measured to at different developmental stages to examine sequence motifs that caused tail length changes. At the same time  polyA tail lengths of endogenous mRNAs from frog oocytes and embryos  fish embryos  and mouse oocytes were measured to investiage how their tail lengths were controlled. Please note that sample titles have been updated on Jan 6  2024.", null, null, null, "Fish embryo mRNA 128cell PAL seq v4", "GSM7716867", null, "source name:embryo|tissue:embryo|treatment:N1|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing", "Fish embryo mRNA 128cell PAL seq v4", "For gene specific tail seq of mRNA reporters  data were processed with a custom script available at https://github.com/coffeebond/MPRA tail seq. For PAL seq v3 or v4  reads were trimmed with cutadapt v3.7 with the parameters \u201c m 15   quality base=64  q 20 20   match read wildcards  e 0.05  a NNNNATCTCGTATGCCGTCTTCTGCTTG  O 7\u201d. The trimmed reads were mapped using STAR v2.7.1a to the reference database containing the genomic sequences of the organism from which the mRNAs were obtained  the genomic sequences of humans or fish  depending on which spike in RNAs were used  and the sequences of the polyA standards generated previously  with the parameters \u201c  runThreadN 16   runMode alignReads   outFilterMultimapNmax 1   outReadsUnmapped Fastx   outFilterType BySJout   outSAMattributes All   outSAMtype BAM Unsorted SortedByCoordinate\u201d. Uniquely mapped read were furhter processed with a custom script available at https://github.com/coffeebond/PAL seq. Assembly: Homo sapiens: GRCh38.p7 primary assembly. Mus muculus: GRCh38.p4  primary assembly. Xenopus laevis: v10.1 assembly. Danio rerio: GRCz11 assembly. Supplementary files format and content: For gene specific tail seq of mRNA reporters  tab delimited text files with columns indicating 1 sequence of the variable region; 2 median tail length; 3 number of reads; 4\u20137 tail lengths at quantile 10  25  75  and 90. Supplementary files format and content: For PAL seq v3 or v4  tab delimited files with columns indicating 1 gene ID or polyA site ID; 2 read cluster ID; 3 tail length Library strategy: PAL seq v4", "embryo", null, "Frog oocytes and embryos were lysed in ice cold buffer RL 20 mM HEPES pH 7.5  100 mM KCl  5 mM MgCl2  1% [v/v] Triton X 100  100 \u00b5g/ml cycloheximide  cOmplete protease inhibitor cocktail [1 tablet per 10 ml buffer]  and 200 units/ml SUPERase\u2022In in a volume of 10 \u00b5l per oocyte/embryo by vigorous shaking and pipetting. Lysates were cleared by centrifugation at 5000 g at 4\u00b0C for 10 min. The supernatant was transfered to a new tube and mixed with the Tri reagent for RNA isolation. Fish embryos were de chorionated by incubation with 2 mg/ml pronase in E3 medium for 4 min. post removing all E3 medium  Tri Reagent was added to the embryos for RNA isolation. Mouse GV oocytes were collected in 37\u00b0C MEM in the presence of milrinone to prevent maturation. Cumulus cells were removed from cumulus oocyte complexes by repeated aspiration through a glass pipette. GV oocytes were then collected in TRI reagent for RNA isolation. Mouse MII oocytes were harvested from the oviducts of hCG induced mice 16 hr  denuded with 3 mg/ml hyaluronidase for 2 min  washed  and then collected in Tri reagent for RNA isolation. For gene specific tail seq of reporter libraries  total RNA with reporter mRNA libraries was ligated to a pre adenylated 3\u02b9 adapter directly in most cases  but for the N60 library injected into fish embryos and frog oocytes  the N37 PAS N17 library injected into fish embryos and frog oocytes  and the CPEmos N60 and N60LC PASmos libraries injected into frog oocytes  reporter library mRNAs were enriched by anti sense oligo capture with biotinylated oligos. RNA isolated from the oocyte or embryo lysate was mixed with 8 pmol KXSH009  8 pmol KXSH010  and 2x SSC 0.3 M NaCl  30 mM sodium citrate pH 7.0 in a total of 50 \u00b5l. The RNA and oligos were annealed by incubation at 70\u00b0C for 5 min and then slowly cooling to 23\u00b0C at 0.1\u00b0C/sec. The annealed mixture was combined with 40 \u00b5l MyOne Streptavidin C1 beads Thermo Fisher  65002 and incubated for 20 min at 23\u00b0C on a thermal mixer  shaking with 15 sec on and 1 min 45 sec off. The supernatant was separated from the beads with a magnetic rack and removed. The beads were washed twice with 300 \u00b5l 1xB&W buffer 5 mM Tris HCl pH 7.5  0.5 mM EDTA  1 M NaCl and once with 300 \u00b5l 2x SSC. The RNA was eluted from the beads first with 100 \u00b5l 10 mM HEPES pH 7.5 at 65\u00b0C for 3 min and then second with 100 \u00b5l water at 65\u00b0C for 3 min. The eluates were combined  precipitated with ethanol  and resuspended in 6.5 \u00b5l water. The anti sense oligo enriched RNA or the RNA isolated from oocyte or embryo lysates was ligated to a pre adenylated 3\u02b9 adapter in a 10 \u00b5l reaction containing 5 \u00b5M 3\u02b9 adapter KXS330  50 mM HEPES pH 7.5  10 mM MgCl2  10 mM dithiothreitol  1 unit/\u00b5l T4 RNA ligase 1 New England Biolabs  M0204S. The ligation reaction was incubated at 23\u00b0C for 150 min. post ligation  RNA was extracted with phenol/chloroform  precipitated with ethanol  and resuspended in 11.4 \u00b5l water. The ligated RNA was mixed with 0.6 \u00b5l 100 \u00b5M reverse transcription primer KXS037 in a total volume of 12 \u00b5l  incubated at 65\u00b0C for 5 min  and cooled on ice for 1 min. The annealed RNA was reverse transcribed in a 20 \u00b5l reaction containing 1x First Strand Buffer  500 \u00b5M dNTPs  5 mM dithiothreitol  1 unit/\u00b5l SUPERase\u2022In  and 200 units SuperScript III Thermo Fisher  18080044 at 50\u00b0C for 1 hr. post reverse transcription  RNA was hydrolyzed with 3.3 \u00b5l 1 M NaOH at 90\u00b0C for 10 min  followed by neutralization with 36.7 \u00b5l 1 M HEPES pH 7.5 and the cDNA was collected by desalting with a Micro Bio Spin P 30 column. The cDNA library was amplified in a 50 \u00b5l PCR reaction with KXS037 and a barcoded primer Supplemental using the KAPA HiFi HotStart Kits following the manufacturer\u2019s suggested protocol for 10\u201315 cycles. The PCR amplified library was cleaned up twice with AMPure XP beads Beckman Coulter  A63881 with a beads to sample ratio of 1.2. For sequencing of endogenous mRNA polyA tail length  libraries were prepared with PAL seq v3 for frog oocytes or PAL seq v4 for frog embryos  fish embryos  and mouse oocytes as described previously PMID: 34213414. When preparing the sequencing libraries of mRNAs from fish embryos  a different 3\u02b9 adapter KXS013 was used for 3\u02b9 end ligation  and polyA selected mRNA from HeLa cells was used as spike in  replacing polyA selected mRNA from zebrafish ZF4 cell line. The first round of sequencing results suggested that a large fraction of the fish mRNA libraries was 5.8S rRNA. The cDNA of 5.8S rRNA was depleted from the cDNA libraries with an antisense oligo. The seven cDNA libraries made from mRNAs of zebrafish embryos at different stages were mixed at roughly equal molar ratios in a total of 5 fmol. Fifty pmol KXSH015 and 2x SSC were added in a total of 100 \u00b5l. The cDNAs and the oligo were annealed by incubation at 65\u00b0C for 5 min and then slowly cooling to 23\u00b0C at 0.1\u00b0C/sec. The annealed mixture was combined with 100 \u00b5l MyOne Streptavidin C1 beads and incubated for 20 min at 23\u00b0C on a thermal mixer  shaking with 15 sec on and 1 min 45 sec off. The supernatant was separated from the beads with a magnetic rack. The beads were washed once with 200 \u00b5l 1xB&W buffer. The supernatant and the wash were combined  precipitated with ethanol  and resuspended in 30 \u00b5l water. The oligo depleted libraries were sequenced again as a technical replicate. Sequencing data of replicates were merged for each sample post monitoring consistency.", null, "tissue:embryo|treatment:N1", "GSM7716867", "GSM7716867: Fish embryo mRNA 128cell PAL seq v4; Danio rerio; OTHER", "GSM7716867 r1", "GSM7716867", "1", "Frog oocytes and embryos were lysed in ice cold buffer RL 20 mM HEPES pH 7.5  100 mM KCl  5 mM MgCl2  1% [v/v] Triton X 100  100 \u00b5g/ml cycloheximide  cOmplete protease inhibitor cocktail [1 tablet per 10 ml buffer]  and 200 units/ml SUPERase\u2022In in a volume of 10 \u00b5l per oocyte/embryo by vigorous shaking and pipetting. Lysates were cleared by centrifugation at 5000 g at 4\u00b0C for 10 min. The supernatant was transfered to a new tube and mixed with the Tri reagent for RNA isolation. Fish embryos were de chorionated by incubation with 2 mg/ml pronase in E3 medium for 4 min. post removing all E3 medium  Tri Reagent was added to the embryos for RNA isolation. Mouse GV oocytes were collected in 37\u00b0C MEM in the presence of milrinone to prevent maturation. Cumulus cells were removed from cumulus oocyte complexes by repeated aspiration through a glass pipette. GV oocytes were then collected in TRI reagent for RNA isolation. Mouse MII oocytes were harvested from the oviducts of hCG induced mice 16 hr  denuded with 3 mg/ml hyaluronidase for 2 min  washed  and then collected in Tri reagent for RNA isolation. For gene specific tail seq of reporter libraries  total RNA with reporter mRNA libraries was ligated to a pre adenylated 3\u02b9 adapter directly in most cases  but for the N60 library injected into fish embryos and frog oocytes  the N37 PAS N17 library injected into fish embryos and frog oocytes  and the CPEmos N60 and N60LC PASmos libraries injected into frog oocytes  reporter library mRNAs were enriched by anti sense oligo capture with biotinylated oligos. RNA isolated from the oocyte or embryo lysate was mixed with 8 pmol KXSH009  8 pmol KXSH010  and 2x SSC 0.3 M NaCl  30 mM sodium citrate pH 7.0 in a total of 50 \u00b5l. The RNA and oligos were annealed by incubation at 70\u00b0C for 5 min and then slowly cooling to 23\u00b0C at 0.1\u00b0C/sec. The annealed mixture was combined with 40 \u00b5l MyOne Streptavidin C1 beads Thermo Fisher  65002 and incubated for 20 min at 23\u00b0C on a thermal mixer  shaking with 15 sec on and 1 min 45 sec off. The supernatant was separated from the beads with a magnetic rack and removed. The beads were washed twice with 300 \u00b5l 1xB&W buffer 5 mM Tris HCl pH 7.5  0.5 mM EDTA  1 M NaCl and once with 300 \u00b5l 2x SSC. The RNA was eluted from the beads first with 100 \u00b5l 10 mM HEPES pH 7.5 at 65\u00b0C for 3 min and then second with 100 \u00b5l water at 65\u00b0C for 3 min. The eluates were combined  precipitated with ethanol  and resuspended in 6.5 \u00b5l water. The anti sense oligo enriched RNA or the RNA isolated from oocyte or embryo lysates was ligated to a pre adenylated 3\u02b9 adapter in a 10 \u00b5l reaction containing 5 \u00b5M 3\u02b9 adapter KXS330  50 mM HEPES pH 7.5  10 mM MgCl2  10 mM dithiothreitol  1 unit/\u00b5l T4 RNA ligase 1 New England Biolabs  M0204S. The ligation reaction was incubated at 23\u00b0C for 150 min. post ligation  RNA was extracted with phenol/chloroform  precipitated with ethanol  and resuspended in 11.4 \u00b5l water. The ligated RNA was mixed with 0.6 \u00b5l 100 \u00b5M reverse transcription primer KXS037 in a total volume of 12 \u00b5l  incubated at 65\u00b0C for 5 min  and cooled on ice for 1 min. The annealed RNA was reverse transcribed in a 20 \u00b5l reaction containing 1x First Strand Buffer  500 \u00b5M dNTPs  5 mM dithiothreitol  1 unit/\u00b5l SUPERase\u2022In  and 200 units SuperScript III Thermo Fisher  18080044 at 50\u00b0C for 1 hr. post reverse transcription  RNA was hydrolyzed with 3.3 \u00b5l 1 M NaOH at 90\u00b0C for 10 min  followed by neutralization with 36.7 \u00b5l 1 M HEPES pH 7.5 and the cDNA was collected by desalting with a Micro Bio Spin P 30 column. The cDNA library was amplified in a 50 \u00b5l PCR reaction with KXS037 and a barcoded primer Supplemental using the KAPA HiFi HotStart Kits following the manufacturer's suggested protocol for 10\u201315 cycles. The PCR amplified library was cleaned up twice with AMPure XP beads Beckman Coulter  A63881 with a beads to sample ratio of 1.2. For sequencing of endogenous mRNA polyA tail length  libraries were prepared with PAL seq v3 for frog oocytes or PAL seq v4 for frog embryos  fish embryos  and mouse oocytes as described previously PMID: 34213414. When preparing the sequencing libraries of mRNAs from fish embryos  a different 3\u02b9 adapter KXS013 was used for 3\u02b9 end ligation  and polyA selected mRNA from HeLa cells was used as spike in  replacing polyA selected mRNA from zebrafish ZF4 cell line. The first round of sequencing results suggested that a large fraction of the fish mRNA libraries was 5.8S rRNA. The cDNA of 5.8S rRNA was depleted from the cDNA libraries with an antisense oligo. The seven cDNA libraries made from mRNAs of zebrafish embryos at different stages were mixed at roughly equal molar ratios in a total of 5 fmol. Fifty pmol KXSH015 and 2x SSC were added in a total of 100 \u00b5l. The cDNAs and the oligo were annealed by incubation at 65\u00b0C for 5 min and then slowly cooling to 23\u00b0C at 0.1\u00b0C/sec. The annealed mixture was combined with 100 \u00b5l MyOne Streptavidin C1 beads and incubated for 20 min at 23\u00b0C on a thermal mixer  shaking with 15 sec on and 1 min 45 sec off. The supernatant was separated from the beads with a magnetic rack. The beads were washed once with 200 \u00b5l 1xB&W buffer. The supernatant and the wash were combined  precipitated with ethanol  and resuspended in 30 \u00b5l water. The oligo depleted libraries were sequenced again as a technical replicate. Sequencing data of replicates were merged for each sample post monitoring consistency.", null, "OTHER", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "Illumina HiSeq 2500", null, "SRP455680", null, null, "Fish_embryo_mRNA_128cell_PAL_seq_v4_rep2_raw_read1.fastq.gz Fish_embryo_mRNA_128cell_PAL_seq_v4_rep2_raw_read2.fastq.gz", "fastq fastq", 3135806371.0, 10214353.0, "GSM7716867 r2", "0:52 1:255", "A:776612486;C:774126305;G:853951502;T:724788612;N:6327466", 52, 255, null, null, 776612486, 774126305, 853951502, 724788612, 6327466, "SRX21396038", "SRS18636196", "SRA1694849", "Whitehead Institute", "Whitehead Institute", 2, 0.00066, 0.0, 0.00011, 0.0, 0.99939, 1.0, 0.55737, null, 52, 255, "T", "T", "mates < 9% mapping rate", "illumina", "hiseq_era", "unknown", "poly_a", "unknown", "bulk", "bulk", "bulk", null, "United States", "2023-08-17", "Multi-stage", "Embryo", "Embryo Imprecise", "All anatomical structures"], [25192, "SRR25670739", "SRX21396037", "SRS18636195", "SRP455680", "PRJNA1006406", "Control of polyA tail length and translation in vertebrate oocytes and early embryos", "GSE241107", "Other", "During oocyte maturation and early embryonic development  polyA tail lengths strongly influence mRNA translation. However  how tail lengths are controlled at different developmental stages has been unclear. Here  we performed tail length and translational profiling of mRNA reporter libraries each with > 10 million three prime UTR sequence variants in frog oocytes and embryos  and fish embryos. These analyses revealed that the UUUUA motif specifies cytoplasmic polyadenylation and identified diverse context features that modulate the activity of this 5 mer. Additional sequence motifs drive stage specific deadenylation in embryos  and UUUUA and C rich motifs drive tail length independent translational repression in oocytes. A neural network model accurately predicts tail length change during oocyte maturation in frogs  mice  and humans. Analyses of human sequence variants showed that those predicted to disrupt tail length control have been under negative selection  implying that our insights into control of polyA tail length and translation have implications for human health and fertility. Overall design: Sythetic mRNA reporter libraries with random three prime UTR sequences under four different sequence contexts were injected into frog oocytes and embryos and fish embryos. PolyA tail lengths were measured to at different developmental stages to examine sequence motifs that caused tail length changes. At the same time  polyA tail lengths of endogenous mRNAs from frog oocytes and embryos  fish embryos  and mouse oocytes were measured to investiage how their tail lengths were controlled. Please note that sample titles have been updated on Jan 6  2024.", null, null, null, "Fish embryo mRNA 8cell PAL seq v4", "GSM7716866", null, "source name:embryo|tissue:embryo|treatment:N1|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing", "Fish embryo mRNA 8cell PAL seq v4", "For gene specific tail seq of mRNA reporters  data were processed with a custom script available at https://github.com/coffeebond/MPRA tail seq. For PAL seq v3 or v4  reads were trimmed with cutadapt v3.7 with the parameters \u201c m 15   quality base=64  q 20 20   match read wildcards  e 0.05  a NNNNATCTCGTATGCCGTCTTCTGCTTG  O 7\u201d. The trimmed reads were mapped using STAR v2.7.1a to the reference database containing the genomic sequences of the organism from which the mRNAs were obtained  the genomic sequences of humans or fish  depending on which spike in RNAs were used  and the sequences of the polyA standards generated previously  with the parameters \u201c  runThreadN 16   runMode alignReads   outFilterMultimapNmax 1   outReadsUnmapped Fastx   outFilterType BySJout   outSAMattributes All   outSAMtype BAM Unsorted SortedByCoordinate\u201d. Uniquely mapped read were furhter processed with a custom script available at https://github.com/coffeebond/PAL seq. Assembly: Homo sapiens: GRCh38.p7 primary assembly. Mus muculus: GRCh38.p4  primary assembly. Xenopus laevis: v10.1 assembly. Danio rerio: GRCz11 assembly. Supplementary files format and content: For gene specific tail seq of mRNA reporters  tab delimited text files with columns indicating 1 sequence of the variable region; 2 median tail length; 3 number of reads; 4\u20137 tail lengths at quantile 10  25  75  and 90. Supplementary files format and content: For PAL seq v3 or v4  tab delimited files with columns indicating 1 gene ID or polyA site ID; 2 read cluster ID; 3 tail length Library strategy: PAL seq v4", "embryo", null, "Frog oocytes and embryos were lysed in ice cold buffer RL 20 mM HEPES pH 7.5  100 mM KCl  5 mM MgCl2  1% [v/v] Triton X 100  100 \u00b5g/ml cycloheximide  cOmplete protease inhibitor cocktail [1 tablet per 10 ml buffer]  and 200 units/ml SUPERase\u2022In in a volume of 10 \u00b5l per oocyte/embryo by vigorous shaking and pipetting. Lysates were cleared by centrifugation at 5000 g at 4\u00b0C for 10 min. The supernatant was transfered to a new tube and mixed with the Tri reagent for RNA isolation. Fish embryos were de chorionated by incubation with 2 mg/ml pronase in E3 medium for 4 min. post removing all E3 medium  Tri Reagent was added to the embryos for RNA isolation. Mouse GV oocytes were collected in 37\u00b0C MEM in the presence of milrinone to prevent maturation. Cumulus cells were removed from cumulus oocyte complexes by repeated aspiration through a glass pipette. GV oocytes were then collected in TRI reagent for RNA isolation. Mouse MII oocytes were harvested from the oviducts of hCG induced mice 16 hr  denuded with 3 mg/ml hyaluronidase for 2 min  washed  and then collected in Tri reagent for RNA isolation. For gene specific tail seq of reporter libraries  total RNA with reporter mRNA libraries was ligated to a pre adenylated 3\u02b9 adapter directly in most cases  but for the N60 library injected into fish embryos and frog oocytes  the N37 PAS N17 library injected into fish embryos and frog oocytes  and the CPEmos N60 and N60LC PASmos libraries injected into frog oocytes  reporter library mRNAs were enriched by anti sense oligo capture with biotinylated oligos. RNA isolated from the oocyte or embryo lysate was mixed with 8 pmol KXSH009  8 pmol KXSH010  and 2x SSC 0.3 M NaCl  30 mM sodium citrate pH 7.0 in a total of 50 \u00b5l. The RNA and oligos were annealed by incubation at 70\u00b0C for 5 min and then slowly cooling to 23\u00b0C at 0.1\u00b0C/sec. The annealed mixture was combined with 40 \u00b5l MyOne Streptavidin C1 beads Thermo Fisher  65002 and incubated for 20 min at 23\u00b0C on a thermal mixer  shaking with 15 sec on and 1 min 45 sec off. The supernatant was separated from the beads with a magnetic rack and removed. The beads were washed twice with 300 \u00b5l 1xB&W buffer 5 mM Tris HCl pH 7.5  0.5 mM EDTA  1 M NaCl and once with 300 \u00b5l 2x SSC. The RNA was eluted from the beads first with 100 \u00b5l 10 mM HEPES pH 7.5 at 65\u00b0C for 3 min and then second with 100 \u00b5l water at 65\u00b0C for 3 min. The eluates were combined  precipitated with ethanol  and resuspended in 6.5 \u00b5l water. The anti sense oligo enriched RNA or the RNA isolated from oocyte or embryo lysates was ligated to a pre adenylated 3\u02b9 adapter in a 10 \u00b5l reaction containing 5 \u00b5M 3\u02b9 adapter KXS330  50 mM HEPES pH 7.5  10 mM MgCl2  10 mM dithiothreitol  1 unit/\u00b5l T4 RNA ligase 1 New England Biolabs  M0204S. The ligation reaction was incubated at 23\u00b0C for 150 min. post ligation  RNA was extracted with phenol/chloroform  precipitated with ethanol  and resuspended in 11.4 \u00b5l water. The ligated RNA was mixed with 0.6 \u00b5l 100 \u00b5M reverse transcription primer KXS037 in a total volume of 12 \u00b5l  incubated at 65\u00b0C for 5 min  and cooled on ice for 1 min. The annealed RNA was reverse transcribed in a 20 \u00b5l reaction containing 1x First Strand Buffer  500 \u00b5M dNTPs  5 mM dithiothreitol  1 unit/\u00b5l SUPERase\u2022In  and 200 units SuperScript III Thermo Fisher  18080044 at 50\u00b0C for 1 hr. post reverse transcription  RNA was hydrolyzed with 3.3 \u00b5l 1 M NaOH at 90\u00b0C for 10 min  followed by neutralization with 36.7 \u00b5l 1 M HEPES pH 7.5 and the cDNA was collected by desalting with a Micro Bio Spin P 30 column. The cDNA library was amplified in a 50 \u00b5l PCR reaction with KXS037 and a barcoded primer Supplemental using the KAPA HiFi HotStart Kits following the manufacturer\u2019s suggested protocol for 10\u201315 cycles. The PCR amplified library was cleaned up twice with AMPure XP beads Beckman Coulter  A63881 with a beads to sample ratio of 1.2. For sequencing of endogenous mRNA polyA tail length  libraries were prepared with PAL seq v3 for frog oocytes or PAL seq v4 for frog embryos  fish embryos  and mouse oocytes as described previously PMID: 34213414. When preparing the sequencing libraries of mRNAs from fish embryos  a different 3\u02b9 adapter KXS013 was used for 3\u02b9 end ligation  and polyA selected mRNA from HeLa cells was used as spike in  replacing polyA selected mRNA from zebrafish ZF4 cell line. The first round of sequencing results suggested that a large fraction of the fish mRNA libraries was 5.8S rRNA. The cDNA of 5.8S rRNA was depleted from the cDNA libraries with an antisense oligo. The seven cDNA libraries made from mRNAs of zebrafish embryos at different stages were mixed at roughly equal molar ratios in a total of 5 fmol. Fifty pmol KXSH015 and 2x SSC were added in a total of 100 \u00b5l. The cDNAs and the oligo were annealed by incubation at 65\u00b0C for 5 min and then slowly cooling to 23\u00b0C at 0.1\u00b0C/sec. The annealed mixture was combined with 100 \u00b5l MyOne Streptavidin C1 beads and incubated for 20 min at 23\u00b0C on a thermal mixer  shaking with 15 sec on and 1 min 45 sec off. The supernatant was separated from the beads with a magnetic rack. The beads were washed once with 200 \u00b5l 1xB&W buffer. The supernatant and the wash were combined  precipitated with ethanol  and resuspended in 30 \u00b5l water. The oligo depleted libraries were sequenced again as a technical replicate. Sequencing data of replicates were merged for each sample post monitoring consistency.", null, "tissue:embryo|treatment:N1", "GSM7716866", "GSM7716866: Fish embryo mRNA 8cell PAL seq v4; Danio rerio; OTHER", "GSM7716866 r1", "GSM7716866", "1", "Frog oocytes and embryos were lysed in ice cold buffer RL 20 mM HEPES pH 7.5  100 mM KCl  5 mM MgCl2  1% [v/v] Triton X 100  100 \u00b5g/ml cycloheximide  cOmplete protease inhibitor cocktail [1 tablet per 10 ml buffer]  and 200 units/ml SUPERase\u2022In in a volume of 10 \u00b5l per oocyte/embryo by vigorous shaking and pipetting. Lysates were cleared by centrifugation at 5000 g at 4\u00b0C for 10 min. The supernatant was transfered to a new tube and mixed with the Tri reagent for RNA isolation. Fish embryos were de chorionated by incubation with 2 mg/ml pronase in E3 medium for 4 min. post removing all E3 medium  Tri Reagent was added to the embryos for RNA isolation. Mouse GV oocytes were collected in 37\u00b0C MEM in the presence of milrinone to prevent maturation. Cumulus cells were removed from cumulus oocyte complexes by repeated aspiration through a glass pipette. GV oocytes were then collected in TRI reagent for RNA isolation. Mouse MII oocytes were harvested from the oviducts of hCG induced mice 16 hr  denuded with 3 mg/ml hyaluronidase for 2 min  washed  and then collected in Tri reagent for RNA isolation. For gene specific tail seq of reporter libraries  total RNA with reporter mRNA libraries was ligated to a pre adenylated 3\u02b9 adapter directly in most cases  but for the N60 library injected into fish embryos and frog oocytes  the N37 PAS N17 library injected into fish embryos and frog oocytes  and the CPEmos N60 and N60LC PASmos libraries injected into frog oocytes  reporter library mRNAs were enriched by anti sense oligo capture with biotinylated oligos. RNA isolated from the oocyte or embryo lysate was mixed with 8 pmol KXSH009  8 pmol KXSH010  and 2x SSC 0.3 M NaCl  30 mM sodium citrate pH 7.0 in a total of 50 \u00b5l. The RNA and oligos were annealed by incubation at 70\u00b0C for 5 min and then slowly cooling to 23\u00b0C at 0.1\u00b0C/sec. The annealed mixture was combined with 40 \u00b5l MyOne Streptavidin C1 beads Thermo Fisher  65002 and incubated for 20 min at 23\u00b0C on a thermal mixer  shaking with 15 sec on and 1 min 45 sec off. The supernatant was separated from the beads with a magnetic rack and removed. The beads were washed twice with 300 \u00b5l 1xB&W buffer 5 mM Tris HCl pH 7.5  0.5 mM EDTA  1 M NaCl and once with 300 \u00b5l 2x SSC. The RNA was eluted from the beads first with 100 \u00b5l 10 mM HEPES pH 7.5 at 65\u00b0C for 3 min and then second with 100 \u00b5l water at 65\u00b0C for 3 min. The eluates were combined  precipitated with ethanol  and resuspended in 6.5 \u00b5l water. The anti sense oligo enriched RNA or the RNA isolated from oocyte or embryo lysates was ligated to a pre adenylated 3\u02b9 adapter in a 10 \u00b5l reaction containing 5 \u00b5M 3\u02b9 adapter KXS330  50 mM HEPES pH 7.5  10 mM MgCl2  10 mM dithiothreitol  1 unit/\u00b5l T4 RNA ligase 1 New England Biolabs  M0204S. The ligation reaction was incubated at 23\u00b0C for 150 min. post ligation  RNA was extracted with phenol/chloroform  precipitated with ethanol  and resuspended in 11.4 \u00b5l water. The ligated RNA was mixed with 0.6 \u00b5l 100 \u00b5M reverse transcription primer KXS037 in a total volume of 12 \u00b5l  incubated at 65\u00b0C for 5 min  and cooled on ice for 1 min. The annealed RNA was reverse transcribed in a 20 \u00b5l reaction containing 1x First Strand Buffer  500 \u00b5M dNTPs  5 mM dithiothreitol  1 unit/\u00b5l SUPERase\u2022In  and 200 units SuperScript III Thermo Fisher  18080044 at 50\u00b0C for 1 hr. post reverse transcription  RNA was hydrolyzed with 3.3 \u00b5l 1 M NaOH at 90\u00b0C for 10 min  followed by neutralization with 36.7 \u00b5l 1 M HEPES pH 7.5 and the cDNA was collected by desalting with a Micro Bio Spin P 30 column. The cDNA library was amplified in a 50 \u00b5l PCR reaction with KXS037 and a barcoded primer Supplemental using the KAPA HiFi HotStart Kits following the manufacturer's suggested protocol for 10\u201315 cycles. The PCR amplified library was cleaned up twice with AMPure XP beads Beckman Coulter  A63881 with a beads to sample ratio of 1.2. For sequencing of endogenous mRNA polyA tail length  libraries were prepared with PAL seq v3 for frog oocytes or PAL seq v4 for frog embryos  fish embryos  and mouse oocytes as described previously PMID: 34213414. When preparing the sequencing libraries of mRNAs from fish embryos  a different 3\u02b9 adapter KXS013 was used for 3\u02b9 end ligation  and polyA selected mRNA from HeLa cells was used as spike in  replacing polyA selected mRNA from zebrafish ZF4 cell line. The first round of sequencing results suggested that a large fraction of the fish mRNA libraries was 5.8S rRNA. The cDNA of 5.8S rRNA was depleted from the cDNA libraries with an antisense oligo. The seven cDNA libraries made from mRNAs of zebrafish embryos at different stages were mixed at roughly equal molar ratios in a total of 5 fmol. Fifty pmol KXSH015 and 2x SSC were added in a total of 100 \u00b5l. The cDNAs and the oligo were annealed by incubation at 65\u00b0C for 5 min and then slowly cooling to 23\u00b0C at 0.1\u00b0C/sec. The annealed mixture was combined with 100 \u00b5l MyOne Streptavidin C1 beads and incubated for 20 min at 23\u00b0C on a thermal mixer  shaking with 15 sec on and 1 min 45 sec off. The supernatant was separated from the beads with a magnetic rack. The beads were washed once with 200 \u00b5l 1xB&W buffer. The supernatant and the wash were combined  precipitated with ethanol  and resuspended in 30 \u00b5l water. The oligo depleted libraries were sequenced again as a technical replicate. Sequencing data of replicates were merged for each sample post monitoring consistency.", null, "OTHER", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "Illumina HiSeq 2500", null, "SRP455680", null, null, "Fish_embryo_mRNA_8cell_PAL_seq_v4_rep1_raw_read1.fastq.gz Fish_embryo_mRNA_8cell_PAL_seq_v4_rep1_raw_read2.fastq.gz", "fastq fastq", 2618998887.0, 8530941.0, "GSM7716866 r1", "0:52 1:255", "A:673066508;C:641446717;G:706546263;T:590452494;N:7486905", 52, 255, null, null, 673066508, 641446717, 706546263, 590452494, 7486905, "SRX21396037", "SRS18636195", "SRA1694849", "Whitehead Institute", "Whitehead Institute", 2, 0.0009, 0.43244, 0.00014, 0.0054, 0.99902, 0.99967, 0.54901, 1.0, 52, 255, "T", "B", "mate1 technical by mapping diff", "illumina", "hiseq_era", "unknown", "poly_a", "unknown", "bulk", "bulk", "bulk", null, "United States", "2023-08-17", "Multi-stage", "Embryo", "Embryo Imprecise", "All anatomical structures"], [25193, "SRR25670740", "SRX21396037", "SRS18636195", "SRP455680", "PRJNA1006406", "Control of polyA tail length and translation in vertebrate oocytes and early embryos", "GSE241107", "Other", "During oocyte maturation and early embryonic development  polyA tail lengths strongly influence mRNA translation. However  how tail lengths are controlled at different developmental stages has been unclear. Here  we performed tail length and translational profiling of mRNA reporter libraries each with > 10 million three prime UTR sequence variants in frog oocytes and embryos  and fish embryos. These analyses revealed that the UUUUA motif specifies cytoplasmic polyadenylation and identified diverse context features that modulate the activity of this 5 mer. Additional sequence motifs drive stage specific deadenylation in embryos  and UUUUA and C rich motifs drive tail length independent translational repression in oocytes. A neural network model accurately predicts tail length change during oocyte maturation in frogs  mice  and humans. Analyses of human sequence variants showed that those predicted to disrupt tail length control have been under negative selection  implying that our insights into control of polyA tail length and translation have implications for human health and fertility. Overall design: Sythetic mRNA reporter libraries with random three prime UTR sequences under four different sequence contexts were injected into frog oocytes and embryos and fish embryos. PolyA tail lengths were measured to at different developmental stages to examine sequence motifs that caused tail length changes. At the same time  polyA tail lengths of endogenous mRNAs from frog oocytes and embryos  fish embryos  and mouse oocytes were measured to investiage how their tail lengths were controlled. Please note that sample titles have been updated on Jan 6  2024.", null, null, null, "Fish embryo mRNA 8cell PAL seq v4", "GSM7716866", null, "source name:embryo|tissue:embryo|treatment:N1|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing", "Fish embryo mRNA 8cell PAL seq v4", "For gene specific tail seq of mRNA reporters  data were processed with a custom script available at https://github.com/coffeebond/MPRA tail seq. For PAL seq v3 or v4  reads were trimmed with cutadapt v3.7 with the parameters \u201c m 15   quality base=64  q 20 20   match read wildcards  e 0.05  a NNNNATCTCGTATGCCGTCTTCTGCTTG  O 7\u201d. The trimmed reads were mapped using STAR v2.7.1a to the reference database containing the genomic sequences of the organism from which the mRNAs were obtained  the genomic sequences of humans or fish  depending on which spike in RNAs were used  and the sequences of the polyA standards generated previously  with the parameters \u201c  runThreadN 16   runMode alignReads   outFilterMultimapNmax 1   outReadsUnmapped Fastx   outFilterType BySJout   outSAMattributes All   outSAMtype BAM Unsorted SortedByCoordinate\u201d. Uniquely mapped read were furhter processed with a custom script available at https://github.com/coffeebond/PAL seq. Assembly: Homo sapiens: GRCh38.p7 primary assembly. Mus muculus: GRCh38.p4  primary assembly. Xenopus laevis: v10.1 assembly. Danio rerio: GRCz11 assembly. Supplementary files format and content: For gene specific tail seq of mRNA reporters  tab delimited text files with columns indicating 1 sequence of the variable region; 2 median tail length; 3 number of reads; 4\u20137 tail lengths at quantile 10  25  75  and 90. Supplementary files format and content: For PAL seq v3 or v4  tab delimited files with columns indicating 1 gene ID or polyA site ID; 2 read cluster ID; 3 tail length Library strategy: PAL seq v4", "embryo", null, "Frog oocytes and embryos were lysed in ice cold buffer RL 20 mM HEPES pH 7.5  100 mM KCl  5 mM MgCl2  1% [v/v] Triton X 100  100 \u00b5g/ml cycloheximide  cOmplete protease inhibitor cocktail [1 tablet per 10 ml buffer]  and 200 units/ml SUPERase\u2022In in a volume of 10 \u00b5l per oocyte/embryo by vigorous shaking and pipetting. Lysates were cleared by centrifugation at 5000 g at 4\u00b0C for 10 min. The supernatant was transfered to a new tube and mixed with the Tri reagent for RNA isolation. Fish embryos were de chorionated by incubation with 2 mg/ml pronase in E3 medium for 4 min. post removing all E3 medium  Tri Reagent was added to the embryos for RNA isolation. Mouse GV oocytes were collected in 37\u00b0C MEM in the presence of milrinone to prevent maturation. Cumulus cells were removed from cumulus oocyte complexes by repeated aspiration through a glass pipette. GV oocytes were then collected in TRI reagent for RNA isolation. Mouse MII oocytes were harvested from the oviducts of hCG induced mice 16 hr  denuded with 3 mg/ml hyaluronidase for 2 min  washed  and then collected in Tri reagent for RNA isolation. For gene specific tail seq of reporter libraries  total RNA with reporter mRNA libraries was ligated to a pre adenylated 3\u02b9 adapter directly in most cases  but for the N60 library injected into fish embryos and frog oocytes  the N37 PAS N17 library injected into fish embryos and frog oocytes  and the CPEmos N60 and N60LC PASmos libraries injected into frog oocytes  reporter library mRNAs were enriched by anti sense oligo capture with biotinylated oligos. RNA isolated from the oocyte or embryo lysate was mixed with 8 pmol KXSH009  8 pmol KXSH010  and 2x SSC 0.3 M NaCl  30 mM sodium citrate pH 7.0 in a total of 50 \u00b5l. The RNA and oligos were annealed by incubation at 70\u00b0C for 5 min and then slowly cooling to 23\u00b0C at 0.1\u00b0C/sec. The annealed mixture was combined with 40 \u00b5l MyOne Streptavidin C1 beads Thermo Fisher  65002 and incubated for 20 min at 23\u00b0C on a thermal mixer  shaking with 15 sec on and 1 min 45 sec off. The supernatant was separated from the beads with a magnetic rack and removed. The beads were washed twice with 300 \u00b5l 1xB&W buffer 5 mM Tris HCl pH 7.5  0.5 mM EDTA  1 M NaCl and once with 300 \u00b5l 2x SSC. The RNA was eluted from the beads first with 100 \u00b5l 10 mM HEPES pH 7.5 at 65\u00b0C for 3 min and then second with 100 \u00b5l water at 65\u00b0C for 3 min. The eluates were combined  precipitated with ethanol  and resuspended in 6.5 \u00b5l water. The anti sense oligo enriched RNA or the RNA isolated from oocyte or embryo lysates was ligated to a pre adenylated 3\u02b9 adapter in a 10 \u00b5l reaction containing 5 \u00b5M 3\u02b9 adapter KXS330  50 mM HEPES pH 7.5  10 mM MgCl2  10 mM dithiothreitol  1 unit/\u00b5l T4 RNA ligase 1 New England Biolabs  M0204S. The ligation reaction was incubated at 23\u00b0C for 150 min. post ligation  RNA was extracted with phenol/chloroform  precipitated with ethanol  and resuspended in 11.4 \u00b5l water. The ligated RNA was mixed with 0.6 \u00b5l 100 \u00b5M reverse transcription primer KXS037 in a total volume of 12 \u00b5l  incubated at 65\u00b0C for 5 min  and cooled on ice for 1 min. The annealed RNA was reverse transcribed in a 20 \u00b5l reaction containing 1x First Strand Buffer  500 \u00b5M dNTPs  5 mM dithiothreitol  1 unit/\u00b5l SUPERase\u2022In  and 200 units SuperScript III Thermo Fisher  18080044 at 50\u00b0C for 1 hr. post reverse transcription  RNA was hydrolyzed with 3.3 \u00b5l 1 M NaOH at 90\u00b0C for 10 min  followed by neutralization with 36.7 \u00b5l 1 M HEPES pH 7.5 and the cDNA was collected by desalting with a Micro Bio Spin P 30 column. The cDNA library was amplified in a 50 \u00b5l PCR reaction with KXS037 and a barcoded primer Supplemental using the KAPA HiFi HotStart Kits following the manufacturer\u2019s suggested protocol for 10\u201315 cycles. The PCR amplified library was cleaned up twice with AMPure XP beads Beckman Coulter  A63881 with a beads to sample ratio of 1.2. For sequencing of endogenous mRNA polyA tail length  libraries were prepared with PAL seq v3 for frog oocytes or PAL seq v4 for frog embryos  fish embryos  and mouse oocytes as described previously PMID: 34213414. When preparing the sequencing libraries of mRNAs from fish embryos  a different 3\u02b9 adapter KXS013 was used for 3\u02b9 end ligation  and polyA selected mRNA from HeLa cells was used as spike in  replacing polyA selected mRNA from zebrafish ZF4 cell line. The first round of sequencing results suggested that a large fraction of the fish mRNA libraries was 5.8S rRNA. The cDNA of 5.8S rRNA was depleted from the cDNA libraries with an antisense oligo. The seven cDNA libraries made from mRNAs of zebrafish embryos at different stages were mixed at roughly equal molar ratios in a total of 5 fmol. Fifty pmol KXSH015 and 2x SSC were added in a total of 100 \u00b5l. The cDNAs and the oligo were annealed by incubation at 65\u00b0C for 5 min and then slowly cooling to 23\u00b0C at 0.1\u00b0C/sec. The annealed mixture was combined with 100 \u00b5l MyOne Streptavidin C1 beads and incubated for 20 min at 23\u00b0C on a thermal mixer  shaking with 15 sec on and 1 min 45 sec off. The supernatant was separated from the beads with a magnetic rack. The beads were washed once with 200 \u00b5l 1xB&W buffer. The supernatant and the wash were combined  precipitated with ethanol  and resuspended in 30 \u00b5l water. The oligo depleted libraries were sequenced again as a technical replicate. Sequencing data of replicates were merged for each sample post monitoring consistency.", null, "tissue:embryo|treatment:N1", "GSM7716866", "GSM7716866: Fish embryo mRNA 8cell PAL seq v4; Danio rerio; OTHER", "GSM7716866 r1", "GSM7716866", "1", "Frog oocytes and embryos were lysed in ice cold buffer RL 20 mM HEPES pH 7.5  100 mM KCl  5 mM MgCl2  1% [v/v] Triton X 100  100 \u00b5g/ml cycloheximide  cOmplete protease inhibitor cocktail [1 tablet per 10 ml buffer]  and 200 units/ml SUPERase\u2022In in a volume of 10 \u00b5l per oocyte/embryo by vigorous shaking and pipetting. Lysates were cleared by centrifugation at 5000 g at 4\u00b0C for 10 min. The supernatant was transfered to a new tube and mixed with the Tri reagent for RNA isolation. Fish embryos were de chorionated by incubation with 2 mg/ml pronase in E3 medium for 4 min. post removing all E3 medium  Tri Reagent was added to the embryos for RNA isolation. Mouse GV oocytes were collected in 37\u00b0C MEM in the presence of milrinone to prevent maturation. Cumulus cells were removed from cumulus oocyte complexes by repeated aspiration through a glass pipette. GV oocytes were then collected in TRI reagent for RNA isolation. Mouse MII oocytes were harvested from the oviducts of hCG induced mice 16 hr  denuded with 3 mg/ml hyaluronidase for 2 min  washed  and then collected in Tri reagent for RNA isolation. For gene specific tail seq of reporter libraries  total RNA with reporter mRNA libraries was ligated to a pre adenylated 3\u02b9 adapter directly in most cases  but for the N60 library injected into fish embryos and frog oocytes  the N37 PAS N17 library injected into fish embryos and frog oocytes  and the CPEmos N60 and N60LC PASmos libraries injected into frog oocytes  reporter library mRNAs were enriched by anti sense oligo capture with biotinylated oligos. RNA isolated from the oocyte or embryo lysate was mixed with 8 pmol KXSH009  8 pmol KXSH010  and 2x SSC 0.3 M NaCl  30 mM sodium citrate pH 7.0 in a total of 50 \u00b5l. The RNA and oligos were annealed by incubation at 70\u00b0C for 5 min and then slowly cooling to 23\u00b0C at 0.1\u00b0C/sec. The annealed mixture was combined with 40 \u00b5l MyOne Streptavidin C1 beads Thermo Fisher  65002 and incubated for 20 min at 23\u00b0C on a thermal mixer  shaking with 15 sec on and 1 min 45 sec off. The supernatant was separated from the beads with a magnetic rack and removed. The beads were washed twice with 300 \u00b5l 1xB&W buffer 5 mM Tris HCl pH 7.5  0.5 mM EDTA  1 M NaCl and once with 300 \u00b5l 2x SSC. The RNA was eluted from the beads first with 100 \u00b5l 10 mM HEPES pH 7.5 at 65\u00b0C for 3 min and then second with 100 \u00b5l water at 65\u00b0C for 3 min. The eluates were combined  precipitated with ethanol  and resuspended in 6.5 \u00b5l water. The anti sense oligo enriched RNA or the RNA isolated from oocyte or embryo lysates was ligated to a pre adenylated 3\u02b9 adapter in a 10 \u00b5l reaction containing 5 \u00b5M 3\u02b9 adapter KXS330  50 mM HEPES pH 7.5  10 mM MgCl2  10 mM dithiothreitol  1 unit/\u00b5l T4 RNA ligase 1 New England Biolabs  M0204S. The ligation reaction was incubated at 23\u00b0C for 150 min. post ligation  RNA was extracted with phenol/chloroform  precipitated with ethanol  and resuspended in 11.4 \u00b5l water. The ligated RNA was mixed with 0.6 \u00b5l 100 \u00b5M reverse transcription primer KXS037 in a total volume of 12 \u00b5l  incubated at 65\u00b0C for 5 min  and cooled on ice for 1 min. The annealed RNA was reverse transcribed in a 20 \u00b5l reaction containing 1x First Strand Buffer  500 \u00b5M dNTPs  5 mM dithiothreitol  1 unit/\u00b5l SUPERase\u2022In  and 200 units SuperScript III Thermo Fisher  18080044 at 50\u00b0C for 1 hr. post reverse transcription  RNA was hydrolyzed with 3.3 \u00b5l 1 M NaOH at 90\u00b0C for 10 min  followed by neutralization with 36.7 \u00b5l 1 M HEPES pH 7.5 and the cDNA was collected by desalting with a Micro Bio Spin P 30 column. The cDNA library was amplified in a 50 \u00b5l PCR reaction with KXS037 and a barcoded primer Supplemental using the KAPA HiFi HotStart Kits following the manufacturer's suggested protocol for 10\u201315 cycles. The PCR amplified library was cleaned up twice with AMPure XP beads Beckman Coulter  A63881 with a beads to sample ratio of 1.2. For sequencing of endogenous mRNA polyA tail length  libraries were prepared with PAL seq v3 for frog oocytes or PAL seq v4 for frog embryos  fish embryos  and mouse oocytes as described previously PMID: 34213414. When preparing the sequencing libraries of mRNAs from fish embryos  a different 3\u02b9 adapter KXS013 was used for 3\u02b9 end ligation  and polyA selected mRNA from HeLa cells was used as spike in  replacing polyA selected mRNA from zebrafish ZF4 cell line. The first round of sequencing results suggested that a large fraction of the fish mRNA libraries was 5.8S rRNA. The cDNA of 5.8S rRNA was depleted from the cDNA libraries with an antisense oligo. The seven cDNA libraries made from mRNAs of zebrafish embryos at different stages were mixed at roughly equal molar ratios in a total of 5 fmol. Fifty pmol KXSH015 and 2x SSC were added in a total of 100 \u00b5l. The cDNAs and the oligo were annealed by incubation at 65\u00b0C for 5 min and then slowly cooling to 23\u00b0C at 0.1\u00b0C/sec. The annealed mixture was combined with 100 \u00b5l MyOne Streptavidin C1 beads and incubated for 20 min at 23\u00b0C on a thermal mixer  shaking with 15 sec on and 1 min 45 sec off. The supernatant was separated from the beads with a magnetic rack. The beads were washed once with 200 \u00b5l 1xB&W buffer. The supernatant and the wash were combined  precipitated with ethanol  and resuspended in 30 \u00b5l water. The oligo depleted libraries were sequenced again as a technical replicate. Sequencing data of replicates were merged for each sample post monitoring consistency.", null, "OTHER", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "Illumina HiSeq 2500", null, "SRP455680", null, null, "Fish_embryo_mRNA_8cell_PAL_seq_v4_rep2_raw_read1.fastq.gz Fish_embryo_mRNA_8cell_PAL_seq_v4_rep2_raw_read2.fastq.gz", "fastq fastq", 3028839589.0, 9865927.0, "GSM7716866 r2", "0:52 1:255", "A:756368817;C:758868409;G:836949742;T:670545278;N:6107343", 52, 255, null, null, 756368817, 758868409, 836949742, 670545278, 6107343, "SRX21396037", "SRS18636195", "SRA1694849", "Whitehead Institute", "Whitehead Institute", 2, 0.00156, 0.0, 0.00026, 0.0, 0.99835, 1.0, 0.44791, null, 52, 255, "T", "T", "mates < 9% mapping rate", "illumina", "hiseq_era", "unknown", "poly_a", "unknown", "bulk", "bulk", "bulk", null, "United States", "2023-08-17", "Multi-stage", "Embryo", "Embryo Imprecise", "All anatomical structures"], [25194, "SRR25670741", "SRX21396036", "SRS18636194", "SRP455680", "PRJNA1006406", "Control of polyA tail length and translation in vertebrate oocytes and early embryos", "GSE241107", "Other", "During oocyte maturation and early embryonic development  polyA tail lengths strongly influence mRNA translation. However  how tail lengths are controlled at different developmental stages has been unclear. Here  we performed tail length and translational profiling of mRNA reporter libraries each with > 10 million three prime UTR sequence variants in frog oocytes and embryos  and fish embryos. These analyses revealed that the UUUUA motif specifies cytoplasmic polyadenylation and identified diverse context features that modulate the activity of this 5 mer. Additional sequence motifs drive stage specific deadenylation in embryos  and UUUUA and C rich motifs drive tail length independent translational repression in oocytes. A neural network model accurately predicts tail length change during oocyte maturation in frogs  mice  and humans. Analyses of human sequence variants showed that those predicted to disrupt tail length control have been under negative selection  implying that our insights into control of polyA tail length and translation have implications for human health and fertility. Overall design: Sythetic mRNA reporter libraries with random three prime UTR sequences under four different sequence contexts were injected into frog oocytes and embryos and fish embryos. PolyA tail lengths were measured to at different developmental stages to examine sequence motifs that caused tail length changes. At the same time  polyA tail lengths of endogenous mRNAs from frog oocytes and embryos  fish embryos  and mouse oocytes were measured to investiage how their tail lengths were controlled. Please note that sample titles have been updated on Jan 6  2024.", null, null, null, "Fish embryo mRNA 1cell PAL seq v4", "GSM7716865", null, "source name:embryo|tissue:embryo|treatment:N1|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing", "Fish embryo mRNA 1cell PAL seq v4", "For gene specific tail seq of mRNA reporters  data were processed with a custom script available at https://github.com/coffeebond/MPRA tail seq. For PAL seq v3 or v4  reads were trimmed with cutadapt v3.7 with the parameters \u201c m 15   quality base=64  q 20 20   match read wildcards  e 0.05  a NNNNATCTCGTATGCCGTCTTCTGCTTG  O 7\u201d. The trimmed reads were mapped using STAR v2.7.1a to the reference database containing the genomic sequences of the organism from which the mRNAs were obtained  the genomic sequences of humans or fish  depending on which spike in RNAs were used  and the sequences of the polyA standards generated previously  with the parameters \u201c  runThreadN 16   runMode alignReads   outFilterMultimapNmax 1   outReadsUnmapped Fastx   outFilterType BySJout   outSAMattributes All   outSAMtype BAM Unsorted SortedByCoordinate\u201d. Uniquely mapped read were furhter processed with a custom script available at https://github.com/coffeebond/PAL seq. Assembly: Homo sapiens: GRCh38.p7 primary assembly. Mus muculus: GRCh38.p4  primary assembly. Xenopus laevis: v10.1 assembly. Danio rerio: GRCz11 assembly. Supplementary files format and content: For gene specific tail seq of mRNA reporters  tab delimited text files with columns indicating 1 sequence of the variable region; 2 median tail length; 3 number of reads; 4\u20137 tail lengths at quantile 10  25  75  and 90. Supplementary files format and content: For PAL seq v3 or v4  tab delimited files with columns indicating 1 gene ID or polyA site ID; 2 read cluster ID; 3 tail length Library strategy: PAL seq v4", "embryo", null, "Frog oocytes and embryos were lysed in ice cold buffer RL 20 mM HEPES pH 7.5  100 mM KCl  5 mM MgCl2  1% [v/v] Triton X 100  100 \u00b5g/ml cycloheximide  cOmplete protease inhibitor cocktail [1 tablet per 10 ml buffer]  and 200 units/ml SUPERase\u2022In in a volume of 10 \u00b5l per oocyte/embryo by vigorous shaking and pipetting. Lysates were cleared by centrifugation at 5000 g at 4\u00b0C for 10 min. The supernatant was transfered to a new tube and mixed with the Tri reagent for RNA isolation. Fish embryos were de chorionated by incubation with 2 mg/ml pronase in E3 medium for 4 min. post removing all E3 medium  Tri Reagent was added to the embryos for RNA isolation. Mouse GV oocytes were collected in 37\u00b0C MEM in the presence of milrinone to prevent maturation. Cumulus cells were removed from cumulus oocyte complexes by repeated aspiration through a glass pipette. GV oocytes were then collected in TRI reagent for RNA isolation. Mouse MII oocytes were harvested from the oviducts of hCG induced mice 16 hr  denuded with 3 mg/ml hyaluronidase for 2 min  washed  and then collected in Tri reagent for RNA isolation. For gene specific tail seq of reporter libraries  total RNA with reporter mRNA libraries was ligated to a pre adenylated 3\u02b9 adapter directly in most cases  but for the N60 library injected into fish embryos and frog oocytes  the N37 PAS N17 library injected into fish embryos and frog oocytes  and the CPEmos N60 and N60LC PASmos libraries injected into frog oocytes  reporter library mRNAs were enriched by anti sense oligo capture with biotinylated oligos. RNA isolated from the oocyte or embryo lysate was mixed with 8 pmol KXSH009  8 pmol KXSH010  and 2x SSC 0.3 M NaCl  30 mM sodium citrate pH 7.0 in a total of 50 \u00b5l. The RNA and oligos were annealed by incubation at 70\u00b0C for 5 min and then slowly cooling to 23\u00b0C at 0.1\u00b0C/sec. The annealed mixture was combined with 40 \u00b5l MyOne Streptavidin C1 beads Thermo Fisher  65002 and incubated for 20 min at 23\u00b0C on a thermal mixer  shaking with 15 sec on and 1 min 45 sec off. The supernatant was separated from the beads with a magnetic rack and removed. The beads were washed twice with 300 \u00b5l 1xB&W buffer 5 mM Tris HCl pH 7.5  0.5 mM EDTA  1 M NaCl and once with 300 \u00b5l 2x SSC. The RNA was eluted from the beads first with 100 \u00b5l 10 mM HEPES pH 7.5 at 65\u00b0C for 3 min and then second with 100 \u00b5l water at 65\u00b0C for 3 min. The eluates were combined  precipitated with ethanol  and resuspended in 6.5 \u00b5l water. The anti sense oligo enriched RNA or the RNA isolated from oocyte or embryo lysates was ligated to a pre adenylated 3\u02b9 adapter in a 10 \u00b5l reaction containing 5 \u00b5M 3\u02b9 adapter KXS330  50 mM HEPES pH 7.5  10 mM MgCl2  10 mM dithiothreitol  1 unit/\u00b5l T4 RNA ligase 1 New England Biolabs  M0204S. The ligation reaction was incubated at 23\u00b0C for 150 min. post ligation  RNA was extracted with phenol/chloroform  precipitated with ethanol  and resuspended in 11.4 \u00b5l water. The ligated RNA was mixed with 0.6 \u00b5l 100 \u00b5M reverse transcription primer KXS037 in a total volume of 12 \u00b5l  incubated at 65\u00b0C for 5 min  and cooled on ice for 1 min. The annealed RNA was reverse transcribed in a 20 \u00b5l reaction containing 1x First Strand Buffer  500 \u00b5M dNTPs  5 mM dithiothreitol  1 unit/\u00b5l SUPERase\u2022In  and 200 units SuperScript III Thermo Fisher  18080044 at 50\u00b0C for 1 hr. post reverse transcription  RNA was hydrolyzed with 3.3 \u00b5l 1 M NaOH at 90\u00b0C for 10 min  followed by neutralization with 36.7 \u00b5l 1 M HEPES pH 7.5 and the cDNA was collected by desalting with a Micro Bio Spin P 30 column. The cDNA library was amplified in a 50 \u00b5l PCR reaction with KXS037 and a barcoded primer Supplemental using the KAPA HiFi HotStart Kits following the manufacturer\u2019s suggested protocol for 10\u201315 cycles. The PCR amplified library was cleaned up twice with AMPure XP beads Beckman Coulter  A63881 with a beads to sample ratio of 1.2. For sequencing of endogenous mRNA polyA tail length  libraries were prepared with PAL seq v3 for frog oocytes or PAL seq v4 for frog embryos  fish embryos  and mouse oocytes as described previously PMID: 34213414. When preparing the sequencing libraries of mRNAs from fish embryos  a different 3\u02b9 adapter KXS013 was used for 3\u02b9 end ligation  and polyA selected mRNA from HeLa cells was used as spike in  replacing polyA selected mRNA from zebrafish ZF4 cell line. The first round of sequencing results suggested that a large fraction of the fish mRNA libraries was 5.8S rRNA. The cDNA of 5.8S rRNA was depleted from the cDNA libraries with an antisense oligo. The seven cDNA libraries made from mRNAs of zebrafish embryos at different stages were mixed at roughly equal molar ratios in a total of 5 fmol. Fifty pmol KXSH015 and 2x SSC were added in a total of 100 \u00b5l. The cDNAs and the oligo were annealed by incubation at 65\u00b0C for 5 min and then slowly cooling to 23\u00b0C at 0.1\u00b0C/sec. The annealed mixture was combined with 100 \u00b5l MyOne Streptavidin C1 beads and incubated for 20 min at 23\u00b0C on a thermal mixer  shaking with 15 sec on and 1 min 45 sec off. The supernatant was separated from the beads with a magnetic rack. The beads were washed once with 200 \u00b5l 1xB&W buffer. The supernatant and the wash were combined  precipitated with ethanol  and resuspended in 30 \u00b5l water. The oligo depleted libraries were sequenced again as a technical replicate. Sequencing data of replicates were merged for each sample post monitoring consistency.", null, "tissue:embryo|treatment:N1", "GSM7716865", "GSM7716865: Fish embryo mRNA 1cell PAL seq v4; Danio rerio; OTHER", "GSM7716865 r1", "GSM7716865", "1", "Frog oocytes and embryos were lysed in ice cold buffer RL 20 mM HEPES pH 7.5  100 mM KCl  5 mM MgCl2  1% [v/v] Triton X 100  100 \u00b5g/ml cycloheximide  cOmplete protease inhibitor cocktail [1 tablet per 10 ml buffer]  and 200 units/ml SUPERase\u2022In in a volume of 10 \u00b5l per oocyte/embryo by vigorous shaking and pipetting. Lysates were cleared by centrifugation at 5000 g at 4\u00b0C for 10 min. The supernatant was transfered to a new tube and mixed with the Tri reagent for RNA isolation. Fish embryos were de chorionated by incubation with 2 mg/ml pronase in E3 medium for 4 min. post removing all E3 medium  Tri Reagent was added to the embryos for RNA isolation. Mouse GV oocytes were collected in 37\u00b0C MEM in the presence of milrinone to prevent maturation. Cumulus cells were removed from cumulus oocyte complexes by repeated aspiration through a glass pipette. GV oocytes were then collected in TRI reagent for RNA isolation. Mouse MII oocytes were harvested from the oviducts of hCG induced mice 16 hr  denuded with 3 mg/ml hyaluronidase for 2 min  washed  and then collected in Tri reagent for RNA isolation. For gene specific tail seq of reporter libraries  total RNA with reporter mRNA libraries was ligated to a pre adenylated 3\u02b9 adapter directly in most cases  but for the N60 library injected into fish embryos and frog oocytes  the N37 PAS N17 library injected into fish embryos and frog oocytes  and the CPEmos N60 and N60LC PASmos libraries injected into frog oocytes  reporter library mRNAs were enriched by anti sense oligo capture with biotinylated oligos. RNA isolated from the oocyte or embryo lysate was mixed with 8 pmol KXSH009  8 pmol KXSH010  and 2x SSC 0.3 M NaCl  30 mM sodium citrate pH 7.0 in a total of 50 \u00b5l. The RNA and oligos were annealed by incubation at 70\u00b0C for 5 min and then slowly cooling to 23\u00b0C at 0.1\u00b0C/sec. The annealed mixture was combined with 40 \u00b5l MyOne Streptavidin C1 beads Thermo Fisher  65002 and incubated for 20 min at 23\u00b0C on a thermal mixer  shaking with 15 sec on and 1 min 45 sec off. The supernatant was separated from the beads with a magnetic rack and removed. The beads were washed twice with 300 \u00b5l 1xB&W buffer 5 mM Tris HCl pH 7.5  0.5 mM EDTA  1 M NaCl and once with 300 \u00b5l 2x SSC. The RNA was eluted from the beads first with 100 \u00b5l 10 mM HEPES pH 7.5 at 65\u00b0C for 3 min and then second with 100 \u00b5l water at 65\u00b0C for 3 min. The eluates were combined  precipitated with ethanol  and resuspended in 6.5 \u00b5l water. The anti sense oligo enriched RNA or the RNA isolated from oocyte or embryo lysates was ligated to a pre adenylated 3\u02b9 adapter in a 10 \u00b5l reaction containing 5 \u00b5M 3\u02b9 adapter KXS330  50 mM HEPES pH 7.5  10 mM MgCl2  10 mM dithiothreitol  1 unit/\u00b5l T4 RNA ligase 1 New England Biolabs  M0204S. The ligation reaction was incubated at 23\u00b0C for 150 min. post ligation  RNA was extracted with phenol/chloroform  precipitated with ethanol  and resuspended in 11.4 \u00b5l water. The ligated RNA was mixed with 0.6 \u00b5l 100 \u00b5M reverse transcription primer KXS037 in a total volume of 12 \u00b5l  incubated at 65\u00b0C for 5 min  and cooled on ice for 1 min. The annealed RNA was reverse transcribed in a 20 \u00b5l reaction containing 1x First Strand Buffer  500 \u00b5M dNTPs  5 mM dithiothreitol  1 unit/\u00b5l SUPERase\u2022In  and 200 units SuperScript III Thermo Fisher  18080044 at 50\u00b0C for 1 hr. post reverse transcription  RNA was hydrolyzed with 3.3 \u00b5l 1 M NaOH at 90\u00b0C for 10 min  followed by neutralization with 36.7 \u00b5l 1 M HEPES pH 7.5 and the cDNA was collected by desalting with a Micro Bio Spin P 30 column. The cDNA library was amplified in a 50 \u00b5l PCR reaction with KXS037 and a barcoded primer Supplemental using the KAPA HiFi HotStart Kits following the manufacturer's suggested protocol for 10\u201315 cycles. The PCR amplified library was cleaned up twice with AMPure XP beads Beckman Coulter  A63881 with a beads to sample ratio of 1.2. For sequencing of endogenous mRNA polyA tail length  libraries were prepared with PAL seq v3 for frog oocytes or PAL seq v4 for frog embryos  fish embryos  and mouse oocytes as described previously PMID: 34213414. When preparing the sequencing libraries of mRNAs from fish embryos  a different 3\u02b9 adapter KXS013 was used for 3\u02b9 end ligation  and polyA selected mRNA from HeLa cells was used as spike in  replacing polyA selected mRNA from zebrafish ZF4 cell line. The first round of sequencing results suggested that a large fraction of the fish mRNA libraries was 5.8S rRNA. The cDNA of 5.8S rRNA was depleted from the cDNA libraries with an antisense oligo. The seven cDNA libraries made from mRNAs of zebrafish embryos at different stages were mixed at roughly equal molar ratios in a total of 5 fmol. Fifty pmol KXSH015 and 2x SSC were added in a total of 100 \u00b5l. The cDNAs and the oligo were annealed by incubation at 65\u00b0C for 5 min and then slowly cooling to 23\u00b0C at 0.1\u00b0C/sec. The annealed mixture was combined with 100 \u00b5l MyOne Streptavidin C1 beads and incubated for 20 min at 23\u00b0C on a thermal mixer  shaking with 15 sec on and 1 min 45 sec off. The supernatant was separated from the beads with a magnetic rack. The beads were washed once with 200 \u00b5l 1xB&W buffer. The supernatant and the wash were combined  precipitated with ethanol  and resuspended in 30 \u00b5l water. The oligo depleted libraries were sequenced again as a technical replicate. Sequencing data of replicates were merged for each sample post monitoring consistency.", null, "OTHER", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "Illumina HiSeq 2500", null, "SRP455680", null, null, "Fish_embryo_mRNA_1cell_PAL_seq_v4_rep1_raw_read1.fastq.gz Fish_embryo_mRNA_1cell_PAL_seq_v4_rep1_raw_read2.fastq.gz", "fastq fastq", 2050143851.0, 6677993.0, "GSM7716865 r1", "0:52 1:255", "A:536391564;C:527126186;G:557802929;T:422990166;N:5833006", 52, 255, null, null, 536391564, 527126186, 557802929, 422990166, 5833006, "SRX21396036", "SRS18636194", "SRA1694849", "Whitehead Institute", "Whitehead Institute", 2, 0.00016, 0.46479, 4e-05, 0.01408, 0.99979, 0.99969, 0.54545, 1.0, 52, 255, "T", "B", "mate1 technical by mapping diff", "illumina", "hiseq_era", "unknown", "poly_a", "unknown", "bulk", "bulk", "bulk", null, "United States", "2023-08-17", "Zygote", "Embryo", "Embryo Imprecise", "All anatomical structures"], [25195, "SRR25670742", "SRX21396036", "SRS18636194", "SRP455680", "PRJNA1006406", "Control of polyA tail length and translation in vertebrate oocytes and early embryos", "GSE241107", "Other", "During oocyte maturation and early embryonic development  polyA tail lengths strongly influence mRNA translation. However  how tail lengths are controlled at different developmental stages has been unclear. Here  we performed tail length and translational profiling of mRNA reporter libraries each with > 10 million three prime UTR sequence variants in frog oocytes and embryos  and fish embryos. These analyses revealed that the UUUUA motif specifies cytoplasmic polyadenylation and identified diverse context features that modulate the activity of this 5 mer. Additional sequence motifs drive stage specific deadenylation in embryos  and UUUUA and C rich motifs drive tail length independent translational repression in oocytes. A neural network model accurately predicts tail length change during oocyte maturation in frogs  mice  and humans. Analyses of human sequence variants showed that those predicted to disrupt tail length control have been under negative selection  implying that our insights into control of polyA tail length and translation have implications for human health and fertility. Overall design: Sythetic mRNA reporter libraries with random three prime UTR sequences under four different sequence contexts were injected into frog oocytes and embryos and fish embryos. PolyA tail lengths were measured to at different developmental stages to examine sequence motifs that caused tail length changes. At the same time  polyA tail lengths of endogenous mRNAs from frog oocytes and embryos  fish embryos  and mouse oocytes were measured to investiage how their tail lengths were controlled. Please note that sample titles have been updated on Jan 6  2024.", null, null, null, "Fish embryo mRNA 1cell PAL seq v4", "GSM7716865", null, "source name:embryo|tissue:embryo|treatment:N1|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing", "Fish embryo mRNA 1cell PAL seq v4", "For gene specific tail seq of mRNA reporters  data were processed with a custom script available at https://github.com/coffeebond/MPRA tail seq. For PAL seq v3 or v4  reads were trimmed with cutadapt v3.7 with the parameters \u201c m 15   quality base=64  q 20 20   match read wildcards  e 0.05  a NNNNATCTCGTATGCCGTCTTCTGCTTG  O 7\u201d. The trimmed reads were mapped using STAR v2.7.1a to the reference database containing the genomic sequences of the organism from which the mRNAs were obtained  the genomic sequences of humans or fish  depending on which spike in RNAs were used  and the sequences of the polyA standards generated previously  with the parameters \u201c  runThreadN 16   runMode alignReads   outFilterMultimapNmax 1   outReadsUnmapped Fastx   outFilterType BySJout   outSAMattributes All   outSAMtype BAM Unsorted SortedByCoordinate\u201d. Uniquely mapped read were furhter processed with a custom script available at https://github.com/coffeebond/PAL seq. Assembly: Homo sapiens: GRCh38.p7 primary assembly. Mus muculus: GRCh38.p4  primary assembly. Xenopus laevis: v10.1 assembly. Danio rerio: GRCz11 assembly. Supplementary files format and content: For gene specific tail seq of mRNA reporters  tab delimited text files with columns indicating 1 sequence of the variable region; 2 median tail length; 3 number of reads; 4\u20137 tail lengths at quantile 10  25  75  and 90. Supplementary files format and content: For PAL seq v3 or v4  tab delimited files with columns indicating 1 gene ID or polyA site ID; 2 read cluster ID; 3 tail length Library strategy: PAL seq v4", "embryo", null, "Frog oocytes and embryos were lysed in ice cold buffer RL 20 mM HEPES pH 7.5  100 mM KCl  5 mM MgCl2  1% [v/v] Triton X 100  100 \u00b5g/ml cycloheximide  cOmplete protease inhibitor cocktail [1 tablet per 10 ml buffer]  and 200 units/ml SUPERase\u2022In in a volume of 10 \u00b5l per oocyte/embryo by vigorous shaking and pipetting. Lysates were cleared by centrifugation at 5000 g at 4\u00b0C for 10 min. The supernatant was transfered to a new tube and mixed with the Tri reagent for RNA isolation. Fish embryos were de chorionated by incubation with 2 mg/ml pronase in E3 medium for 4 min. post removing all E3 medium  Tri Reagent was added to the embryos for RNA isolation. Mouse GV oocytes were collected in 37\u00b0C MEM in the presence of milrinone to prevent maturation. Cumulus cells were removed from cumulus oocyte complexes by repeated aspiration through a glass pipette. GV oocytes were then collected in TRI reagent for RNA isolation. Mouse MII oocytes were harvested from the oviducts of hCG induced mice 16 hr  denuded with 3 mg/ml hyaluronidase for 2 min  washed  and then collected in Tri reagent for RNA isolation. For gene specific tail seq of reporter libraries  total RNA with reporter mRNA libraries was ligated to a pre adenylated 3\u02b9 adapter directly in most cases  but for the N60 library injected into fish embryos and frog oocytes  the N37 PAS N17 library injected into fish embryos and frog oocytes  and the CPEmos N60 and N60LC PASmos libraries injected into frog oocytes  reporter library mRNAs were enriched by anti sense oligo capture with biotinylated oligos. RNA isolated from the oocyte or embryo lysate was mixed with 8 pmol KXSH009  8 pmol KXSH010  and 2x SSC 0.3 M NaCl  30 mM sodium citrate pH 7.0 in a total of 50 \u00b5l. The RNA and oligos were annealed by incubation at 70\u00b0C for 5 min and then slowly cooling to 23\u00b0C at 0.1\u00b0C/sec. The annealed mixture was combined with 40 \u00b5l MyOne Streptavidin C1 beads Thermo Fisher  65002 and incubated for 20 min at 23\u00b0C on a thermal mixer  shaking with 15 sec on and 1 min 45 sec off. The supernatant was separated from the beads with a magnetic rack and removed. The beads were washed twice with 300 \u00b5l 1xB&W buffer 5 mM Tris HCl pH 7.5  0.5 mM EDTA  1 M NaCl and once with 300 \u00b5l 2x SSC. The RNA was eluted from the beads first with 100 \u00b5l 10 mM HEPES pH 7.5 at 65\u00b0C for 3 min and then second with 100 \u00b5l water at 65\u00b0C for 3 min. The eluates were combined  precipitated with ethanol  and resuspended in 6.5 \u00b5l water. The anti sense oligo enriched RNA or the RNA isolated from oocyte or embryo lysates was ligated to a pre adenylated 3\u02b9 adapter in a 10 \u00b5l reaction containing 5 \u00b5M 3\u02b9 adapter KXS330  50 mM HEPES pH 7.5  10 mM MgCl2  10 mM dithiothreitol  1 unit/\u00b5l T4 RNA ligase 1 New England Biolabs  M0204S. The ligation reaction was incubated at 23\u00b0C for 150 min. post ligation  RNA was extracted with phenol/chloroform  precipitated with ethanol  and resuspended in 11.4 \u00b5l water. The ligated RNA was mixed with 0.6 \u00b5l 100 \u00b5M reverse transcription primer KXS037 in a total volume of 12 \u00b5l  incubated at 65\u00b0C for 5 min  and cooled on ice for 1 min. The annealed RNA was reverse transcribed in a 20 \u00b5l reaction containing 1x First Strand Buffer  500 \u00b5M dNTPs  5 mM dithiothreitol  1 unit/\u00b5l SUPERase\u2022In  and 200 units SuperScript III Thermo Fisher  18080044 at 50\u00b0C for 1 hr. post reverse transcription  RNA was hydrolyzed with 3.3 \u00b5l 1 M NaOH at 90\u00b0C for 10 min  followed by neutralization with 36.7 \u00b5l 1 M HEPES pH 7.5 and the cDNA was collected by desalting with a Micro Bio Spin P 30 column. The cDNA library was amplified in a 50 \u00b5l PCR reaction with KXS037 and a barcoded primer Supplemental using the KAPA HiFi HotStart Kits following the manufacturer\u2019s suggested protocol for 10\u201315 cycles. The PCR amplified library was cleaned up twice with AMPure XP beads Beckman Coulter  A63881 with a beads to sample ratio of 1.2. For sequencing of endogenous mRNA polyA tail length  libraries were prepared with PAL seq v3 for frog oocytes or PAL seq v4 for frog embryos  fish embryos  and mouse oocytes as described previously PMID: 34213414. When preparing the sequencing libraries of mRNAs from fish embryos  a different 3\u02b9 adapter KXS013 was used for 3\u02b9 end ligation  and polyA selected mRNA from HeLa cells was used as spike in  replacing polyA selected mRNA from zebrafish ZF4 cell line. The first round of sequencing results suggested that a large fraction of the fish mRNA libraries was 5.8S rRNA. The cDNA of 5.8S rRNA was depleted from the cDNA libraries with an antisense oligo. The seven cDNA libraries made from mRNAs of zebrafish embryos at different stages were mixed at roughly equal molar ratios in a total of 5 fmol. Fifty pmol KXSH015 and 2x SSC were added in a total of 100 \u00b5l. The cDNAs and the oligo were annealed by incubation at 65\u00b0C for 5 min and then slowly cooling to 23\u00b0C at 0.1\u00b0C/sec. The annealed mixture was combined with 100 \u00b5l MyOne Streptavidin C1 beads and incubated for 20 min at 23\u00b0C on a thermal mixer  shaking with 15 sec on and 1 min 45 sec off. The supernatant was separated from the beads with a magnetic rack. The beads were washed once with 200 \u00b5l 1xB&W buffer. The supernatant and the wash were combined  precipitated with ethanol  and resuspended in 30 \u00b5l water. The oligo depleted libraries were sequenced again as a technical replicate. Sequencing data of replicates were merged for each sample post monitoring consistency.", null, "tissue:embryo|treatment:N1", "GSM7716865", "GSM7716865: Fish embryo mRNA 1cell PAL seq v4; Danio rerio; OTHER", "GSM7716865 r1", "GSM7716865", "1", "Frog oocytes and embryos were lysed in ice cold buffer RL 20 mM HEPES pH 7.5  100 mM KCl  5 mM MgCl2  1% [v/v] Triton X 100  100 \u00b5g/ml cycloheximide  cOmplete protease inhibitor cocktail [1 tablet per 10 ml buffer]  and 200 units/ml SUPERase\u2022In in a volume of 10 \u00b5l per oocyte/embryo by vigorous shaking and pipetting. Lysates were cleared by centrifugation at 5000 g at 4\u00b0C for 10 min. The supernatant was transfered to a new tube and mixed with the Tri reagent for RNA isolation. Fish embryos were de chorionated by incubation with 2 mg/ml pronase in E3 medium for 4 min. post removing all E3 medium  Tri Reagent was added to the embryos for RNA isolation. Mouse GV oocytes were collected in 37\u00b0C MEM in the presence of milrinone to prevent maturation. Cumulus cells were removed from cumulus oocyte complexes by repeated aspiration through a glass pipette. GV oocytes were then collected in TRI reagent for RNA isolation. Mouse MII oocytes were harvested from the oviducts of hCG induced mice 16 hr  denuded with 3 mg/ml hyaluronidase for 2 min  washed  and then collected in Tri reagent for RNA isolation. For gene specific tail seq of reporter libraries  total RNA with reporter mRNA libraries was ligated to a pre adenylated 3\u02b9 adapter directly in most cases  but for the N60 library injected into fish embryos and frog oocytes  the N37 PAS N17 library injected into fish embryos and frog oocytes  and the CPEmos N60 and N60LC PASmos libraries injected into frog oocytes  reporter library mRNAs were enriched by anti sense oligo capture with biotinylated oligos. RNA isolated from the oocyte or embryo lysate was mixed with 8 pmol KXSH009  8 pmol KXSH010  and 2x SSC 0.3 M NaCl  30 mM sodium citrate pH 7.0 in a total of 50 \u00b5l. The RNA and oligos were annealed by incubation at 70\u00b0C for 5 min and then slowly cooling to 23\u00b0C at 0.1\u00b0C/sec. The annealed mixture was combined with 40 \u00b5l MyOne Streptavidin C1 beads Thermo Fisher  65002 and incubated for 20 min at 23\u00b0C on a thermal mixer  shaking with 15 sec on and 1 min 45 sec off. The supernatant was separated from the beads with a magnetic rack and removed. The beads were washed twice with 300 \u00b5l 1xB&W buffer 5 mM Tris HCl pH 7.5  0.5 mM EDTA  1 M NaCl and once with 300 \u00b5l 2x SSC. The RNA was eluted from the beads first with 100 \u00b5l 10 mM HEPES pH 7.5 at 65\u00b0C for 3 min and then second with 100 \u00b5l water at 65\u00b0C for 3 min. The eluates were combined  precipitated with ethanol  and resuspended in 6.5 \u00b5l water. The anti sense oligo enriched RNA or the RNA isolated from oocyte or embryo lysates was ligated to a pre adenylated 3\u02b9 adapter in a 10 \u00b5l reaction containing 5 \u00b5M 3\u02b9 adapter KXS330  50 mM HEPES pH 7.5  10 mM MgCl2  10 mM dithiothreitol  1 unit/\u00b5l T4 RNA ligase 1 New England Biolabs  M0204S. The ligation reaction was incubated at 23\u00b0C for 150 min. post ligation  RNA was extracted with phenol/chloroform  precipitated with ethanol  and resuspended in 11.4 \u00b5l water. The ligated RNA was mixed with 0.6 \u00b5l 100 \u00b5M reverse transcription primer KXS037 in a total volume of 12 \u00b5l  incubated at 65\u00b0C for 5 min  and cooled on ice for 1 min. The annealed RNA was reverse transcribed in a 20 \u00b5l reaction containing 1x First Strand Buffer  500 \u00b5M dNTPs  5 mM dithiothreitol  1 unit/\u00b5l SUPERase\u2022In  and 200 units SuperScript III Thermo Fisher  18080044 at 50\u00b0C for 1 hr. post reverse transcription  RNA was hydrolyzed with 3.3 \u00b5l 1 M NaOH at 90\u00b0C for 10 min  followed by neutralization with 36.7 \u00b5l 1 M HEPES pH 7.5 and the cDNA was collected by desalting with a Micro Bio Spin P 30 column. The cDNA library was amplified in a 50 \u00b5l PCR reaction with KXS037 and a barcoded primer Supplemental using the KAPA HiFi HotStart Kits following the manufacturer's suggested protocol for 10\u201315 cycles. The PCR amplified library was cleaned up twice with AMPure XP beads Beckman Coulter  A63881 with a beads to sample ratio of 1.2. For sequencing of endogenous mRNA polyA tail length  libraries were prepared with PAL seq v3 for frog oocytes or PAL seq v4 for frog embryos  fish embryos  and mouse oocytes as described previously PMID: 34213414. When preparing the sequencing libraries of mRNAs from fish embryos  a different 3\u02b9 adapter KXS013 was used for 3\u02b9 end ligation  and polyA selected mRNA from HeLa cells was used as spike in  replacing polyA selected mRNA from zebrafish ZF4 cell line. The first round of sequencing results suggested that a large fraction of the fish mRNA libraries was 5.8S rRNA. The cDNA of 5.8S rRNA was depleted from the cDNA libraries with an antisense oligo. The seven cDNA libraries made from mRNAs of zebrafish embryos at different stages were mixed at roughly equal molar ratios in a total of 5 fmol. Fifty pmol KXSH015 and 2x SSC were added in a total of 100 \u00b5l. The cDNAs and the oligo were annealed by incubation at 65\u00b0C for 5 min and then slowly cooling to 23\u00b0C at 0.1\u00b0C/sec. The annealed mixture was combined with 100 \u00b5l MyOne Streptavidin C1 beads and incubated for 20 min at 23\u00b0C on a thermal mixer  shaking with 15 sec on and 1 min 45 sec off. The supernatant was separated from the beads with a magnetic rack. The beads were washed once with 200 \u00b5l 1xB&W buffer. The supernatant and the wash were combined  precipitated with ethanol  and resuspended in 30 \u00b5l water. The oligo depleted libraries were sequenced again as a technical replicate. Sequencing data of replicates were merged for each sample post monitoring consistency.", null, "OTHER", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "Illumina HiSeq 2500", null, "SRP455680", null, null, "Fish_embryo_mRNA_1cell_PAL_seq_v4_rep2_raw_read1.fastq.gz Fish_embryo_mRNA_1cell_PAL_seq_v4_rep2_raw_read2.fastq.gz", "fastq fastq", 3406093776.0, 11094768.0, "GSM7716865 r2", "0:52 1:255", "A:868054279;C:890446070;G:945289336;T:695324057;N:6980034", 52, 255, null, null, 868054279, 890446070, 945289336, 695324057, 6980034, "SRX21396036", "SRS18636194", "SRA1694849", "Whitehead Institute", "Whitehead Institute", 2, 0.00049, 0.0, 0.00014, 0.0, 0.99939, 1.0, 0.58974, null, 52, 255, "T", "T", "mates < 9% mapping rate", "illumina", "hiseq_era", "unknown", "poly_a", "unknown", "bulk", "bulk", "bulk", null, "United States", "2023-08-17", "Zygote", "Embryo", "Embryo Imprecise", "All anatomical structures"], [31943, "SRR28790250", "SRX24354554", "SRS21112322", "SRP503769", "PRJNA1104180", "Double stranded RNA triggers a distinct integrated stress response in the early embryo [RNA seq  Ribo seq]", "GSE265771", "Other", "Double stranded RNA dsRNA is associated with virus infections and is present as by products during the transcription of synthetic mRNA  which has been widely used in gene gain of function studies and serves as a core component in emerging mRNA based therapies1 4. The presence of dsRNA in host cells induces an integrated stress response that functions to prevent virus replication and infection5 6. Unlike differentiated cells  undifferentiated cells adopt a distinct defense strategy against RNA virus infection7  but the mechanism is unclear. We show a previously unidentified response triggered by dsRNA in the early embryo. Although dsRNA causes a global protein translation inhibition in a PKR eIF2a independent manner and leads to developmental delay and cell necrosis  it also strongly induces p53 activation  which then upregulates Interferon Stimulated Genes independently of interferon ligands. Importantly  we demonstrate that the burst of p53 signaling dose not result in cell death but functions as a protective mechanism against deleterious translation blockage by slowing down global protein degradation via ISGylation. Our work has identified a distinct dsRNA induced stress response in the embryo  reflecting an ancient innate immune memory before the establishment of the IFN system. It also raises the provocative question as to the original protective role of p53 during evolution. Overall design: To characterize the distribution of ribosomes on mRNA  we performed Ribosome profiling Ribo seq analysis with RNA seq on dsRNA injected embryos.", null, null, null, "Zebrafish  Riboseq  high dose  dsRNA2", "GSM8228804", null, "source name:whole embryo|tissue:whole embryo|developmental stage:50% epiboly stage|cell type:embryonic cell|genotype:wild type|treatment:dsRNA|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing", "Zebrafish  Riboseq  high dose  dsRNA2", "The library underwent quality control assessment  and was subjected to Illumina Novaseq 6000 sequencing. Bio informatics analysis of RIBOseq profilling was performed to analyze the library data. Assembly: GRCz10 Supplementary files format and content: Excel file includes raw counts for each Sample Library strategy: Ribo seq", "whole embryo", null, "Both control group and dsRNA injected embryos at xxx hpf were thoroughly lysed on ice using lysis buffer.The lysate was then centrifuged at 12000g at 4\u00b0C for 10 minutes to remove cellular components  including undigested material such as cell nuclei.Then  RNaseI was added to the supernatant and incubated at 25\u00b0C for 30 minutes to digest RNA  while the RNA fragments protected by ribosomes were preserved. Subsequently  an RNA inhibitor was added to terminate the digestion reaction. The lysate was subjected to sucrose density gradient centrifugation  and fractions containing single peaks at 260nm wavelength around the 80S monosome region were collected. The collected mixture was then thoroughly lysed using Trizol for RNA extraction. RNA fragments within the size range of 26 34nt was separated using polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis without xxx  and the corresponding bands were collected. The recovered bands were subjected to ligation reaction  where a preadenylylated and 3\u2019 blocked linker 5\u2019 rApp CTGTAGGCACCATCAAT NH2 3\u2019 was attached to the three prime end of the RNA. The ligated products were then recovered by performing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Subsequently  the recovered RNA fragments were reverse transcribed using a reverse primer to obtain extended cDNA molecules. The purified cDNA was subjected to circularization by using CircLigase Epicentre  CL4111K  resulting in the formation of circular cDNA molecules. To remove residual rRNA components in the cDNA  a method involving hybridization with complementary primers specific to rRNA and subsequent heat denaturation was employed. The remaining circularized cDNA was then amplified through PCR  and barcode sequences were incorporated.", null, "tissue:whole embryo|developmental stage:50% epiboly stage|cell type:embryonic cell|genotype:wild type|treatment:dsRNA", "GSM8228804", "GSM8228804: Zebrafish  Riboseq  high dose  dsRNA2; Danio rerio; OTHER", "GSM8228804 r1", "GSM8228804", "1", "Both control group and dsRNA injected embryos at xxx hpf were thoroughly lysed on ice using lysis buffer.The lysate was then centrifuged at 12000g at 4\u00b0C for 10 minutes to remove cellular components  including undigested material such as cell nuclei.Then  RNaseI was added to the supernatant and incubated at 25\u00b0C for 30 minutes to digest RNA  while the RNA fragments protected by ribosomes were preserved. Subsequently  an RNA inhibitor was added to terminate the digestion reaction. The lysate was subjected to sucrose density gradient centrifugation  and fractions containing single peaks at 260nm wavelength around the 80S monosome region were collected. The collected mixture was then thoroughly lysed using Trizol for RNA extraction. RNA fragments within the size range of 26 34nt was separated using polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis without xxx  and the corresponding bands were collected. The recovered bands were subjected to ligation reaction  where a preadenylylated and three prime blocked linker five prime rApp CTGTAGGCACCATCAAT NH2 three prime was attached to the three prime end of the RNA. The ligated products were then recovered by performing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Subsequently  the recovered RNA fragments were reverse transcribed using a reverse primer to obtain extended cDNA molecules. The purified cDNA was subjected to circularization by using CircLigase Epicentre  CL4111K  resulting in the formation of circular cDNA molecules. To remove residual rRNA components in the cDNA  a method involving hybridization with complementary primers specific to rRNA and subsequent heat denaturation was employed. The remaining circularized cDNA was then amplified through PCR  and barcode sequences were incorporated.", null, "OTHER", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "Illumina NovaSeq 6000", null, "SRP503769", null, null, "dsR_2.R1.raw.fastq.gz dsR_2.R2.raw.fastq.gz", "fastq fastq", 15877367026.0, 52574063.0, "GSM8228804 r1", "0:151 1:151", "A:3017944891;C:2902425937;G:7224440180;T:2731881397;N:674621", 151, 151, null, null, 3017944891, 2902425937, 7224440180, 2731881397, 674621, "SRX24354554", "SRS21112322", "SRA1852128", "ShanDong University", "ShanDong University", null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, "T", "T", "mates < 9% mapping rate", "illumina", "novaseq_era", "3prime", "random_priming", "unknown", "bulk", "unknown", "unknown", null, "China", "2024-04-24", "Gastrula", "Embryo", "Whole Organism", "All anatomical structures"], [31944, "SRR28790251", "SRX24354553", "SRS21112321", "SRP503769", "PRJNA1104180", "Double stranded RNA triggers a distinct integrated stress response in the early embryo [RNA seq  Ribo seq]", "GSE265771", "Other", "Double stranded RNA dsRNA is associated with virus infections and is present as by products during the transcription of synthetic mRNA  which has been widely used in gene gain of function studies and serves as a core component in emerging mRNA based therapies1 4. The presence of dsRNA in host cells induces an integrated stress response that functions to prevent virus replication and infection5 6. Unlike differentiated cells  undifferentiated cells adopt a distinct defense strategy against RNA virus infection7  but the mechanism is unclear. We show a previously unidentified response triggered by dsRNA in the early embryo. Although dsRNA causes a global protein translation inhibition in a PKR eIF2a independent manner and leads to developmental delay and cell necrosis  it also strongly induces p53 activation  which then upregulates Interferon Stimulated Genes independently of interferon ligands. Importantly  we demonstrate that the burst of p53 signaling dose not result in cell death but functions as a protective mechanism against deleterious translation blockage by slowing down global protein degradation via ISGylation. Our work has identified a distinct dsRNA induced stress response in the embryo  reflecting an ancient innate immune memory before the establishment of the IFN system. It also raises the provocative question as to the original protective role of p53 during evolution. Overall design: To characterize the distribution of ribosomes on mRNA  we performed Ribosome profiling Ribo seq analysis with RNA seq on dsRNA injected embryos.", null, null, null, "Zebrafish  Riboseq  high dose  dsRNA1", "GSM8228803", null, "source name:whole embryo|tissue:whole embryo|developmental stage:50% epiboly stage|cell type:embryonic cell|genotype:wild type|treatment:dsRNA|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing", "Zebrafish  Riboseq  high dose  dsRNA1", "The library underwent quality control assessment  and was subjected to Illumina Novaseq 6000 sequencing. Bio informatics analysis of RIBOseq profilling was performed to analyze the library data. Assembly: GRCz10 Supplementary files format and content: Excel file includes raw counts for each Sample Library strategy: Ribo seq", "whole embryo", null, "Both control group and dsRNA injected embryos at xxx hpf were thoroughly lysed on ice using lysis buffer.The lysate was then centrifuged at 12000g at 4\u00b0C for 10 minutes to remove cellular components  including undigested material such as cell nuclei.Then  RNaseI was added to the supernatant and incubated at 25\u00b0C for 30 minutes to digest RNA  while the RNA fragments protected by ribosomes were preserved. Subsequently  an RNA inhibitor was added to terminate the digestion reaction. The lysate was subjected to sucrose density gradient centrifugation  and fractions containing single peaks at 260nm wavelength around the 80S monosome region were collected. The collected mixture was then thoroughly lysed using Trizol for RNA extraction. RNA fragments within the size range of 26 34nt was separated using polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis without xxx  and the corresponding bands were collected. The recovered bands were subjected to ligation reaction  where a preadenylylated and 3\u2019 blocked linker 5\u2019 rApp CTGTAGGCACCATCAAT NH2 3\u2019 was attached to the three prime end of the RNA. The ligated products were then recovered by performing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Subsequently  the recovered RNA fragments were reverse transcribed using a reverse primer to obtain extended cDNA molecules. The purified cDNA was subjected to circularization by using CircLigase Epicentre  CL4111K  resulting in the formation of circular cDNA molecules. To remove residual rRNA components in the cDNA  a method involving hybridization with complementary primers specific to rRNA and subsequent heat denaturation was employed. The remaining circularized cDNA was then amplified through PCR  and barcode sequences were incorporated.", null, "tissue:whole embryo|developmental stage:50% epiboly stage|cell type:embryonic cell|genotype:wild type|treatment:dsRNA", "GSM8228803", "GSM8228803: Zebrafish  Riboseq  high dose  dsRNA1; Danio rerio; OTHER", "GSM8228803 r1", "GSM8228803", "1", "Both control group and dsRNA injected embryos at xxx hpf were thoroughly lysed on ice using lysis buffer.The lysate was then centrifuged at 12000g at 4\u00b0C for 10 minutes to remove cellular components  including undigested material such as cell nuclei.Then  RNaseI was added to the supernatant and incubated at 25\u00b0C for 30 minutes to digest RNA  while the RNA fragments protected by ribosomes were preserved. Subsequently  an RNA inhibitor was added to terminate the digestion reaction. The lysate was subjected to sucrose density gradient centrifugation  and fractions containing single peaks at 260nm wavelength around the 80S monosome region were collected. The collected mixture was then thoroughly lysed using Trizol for RNA extraction. RNA fragments within the size range of 26 34nt was separated using polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis without xxx  and the corresponding bands were collected. The recovered bands were subjected to ligation reaction  where a preadenylylated and three prime blocked linker five prime rApp CTGTAGGCACCATCAAT NH2 three prime was attached to the three prime end of the RNA. The ligated products were then recovered by performing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Subsequently  the recovered RNA fragments were reverse transcribed using a reverse primer to obtain extended cDNA molecules. The purified cDNA was subjected to circularization by using CircLigase Epicentre  CL4111K  resulting in the formation of circular cDNA molecules. To remove residual rRNA components in the cDNA  a method involving hybridization with complementary primers specific to rRNA and subsequent heat denaturation was employed. The remaining circularized cDNA was then amplified through PCR  and barcode sequences were incorporated.", null, "OTHER", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "Illumina NovaSeq 6000", null, "SRP503769", null, null, "dsR_1.R1.raw.fastq.gz dsR_1.R2.raw.fastq.gz", "fastq fastq", 13027928774.0, 43138837.0, "GSM8228803 r1", "0:151 1:151", "A:2538099201;C:2400262316;G:5852047273;T:2236961902;N:558082", 151, 151, null, null, 2538099201, 2400262316, 5852047273, 2236961902, 558082, "SRX24354553", "SRS21112321", "SRA1852128", "ShanDong University", "ShanDong University", null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, "T", "T", "mates < 9% mapping rate", "illumina", "novaseq_era", "3prime", "random_priming", "unknown", "bulk", "unknown", "unknown", null, "China", "2024-04-24", "Gastrula", "Embryo", "Whole Organism", "All anatomical structures"], [31945, "SRR28790252", "SRX24354552", "SRS21112320", "SRP503769", "PRJNA1104180", "Double stranded RNA triggers a distinct integrated stress response in the early embryo [RNA seq  Ribo seq]", "GSE265771", "Other", "Double stranded RNA dsRNA is associated with virus infections and is present as by products during the transcription of synthetic mRNA  which has been widely used in gene gain of function studies and serves as a core component in emerging mRNA based therapies1 4. The presence of dsRNA in host cells induces an integrated stress response that functions to prevent virus replication and infection5 6. Unlike differentiated cells  undifferentiated cells adopt a distinct defense strategy against RNA virus infection7  but the mechanism is unclear. We show a previously unidentified response triggered by dsRNA in the early embryo. Although dsRNA causes a global protein translation inhibition in a PKR eIF2a independent manner and leads to developmental delay and cell necrosis  it also strongly induces p53 activation  which then upregulates Interferon Stimulated Genes independently of interferon ligands. Importantly  we demonstrate that the burst of p53 signaling dose not result in cell death but functions as a protective mechanism against deleterious translation blockage by slowing down global protein degradation via ISGylation. Our work has identified a distinct dsRNA induced stress response in the embryo  reflecting an ancient innate immune memory before the establishment of the IFN system. It also raises the provocative question as to the original protective role of p53 during evolution. Overall design: To characterize the distribution of ribosomes on mRNA  we performed Ribosome profiling Ribo seq analysis with RNA seq on dsRNA injected embryos.", null, null, null, "Zebrafish  Riboseq  high dose  uninj2", "GSM8228802", null, "source name:whole embryo|tissue:whole embryo|developmental stage:50% epiboly stage|cell type:embryonic cell|genotype:wild type|treatment:uninjected|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing", "Zebrafish  Riboseq  high dose  uninj2", "The library underwent quality control assessment  and was subjected to Illumina Novaseq 6000 sequencing. Bio informatics analysis of RIBOseq profilling was performed to analyze the library data. Assembly: GRCz10 Supplementary files format and content: Excel file includes raw counts for each Sample Library strategy: Ribo seq", "whole embryo", null, "Both control group and dsRNA injected embryos at xxx hpf were thoroughly lysed on ice using lysis buffer.The lysate was then centrifuged at 12000g at 4\u00b0C for 10 minutes to remove cellular components  including undigested material such as cell nuclei.Then  RNaseI was added to the supernatant and incubated at 25\u00b0C for 30 minutes to digest RNA  while the RNA fragments protected by ribosomes were preserved. Subsequently  an RNA inhibitor was added to terminate the digestion reaction. The lysate was subjected to sucrose density gradient centrifugation  and fractions containing single peaks at 260nm wavelength around the 80S monosome region were collected. The collected mixture was then thoroughly lysed using Trizol for RNA extraction. RNA fragments within the size range of 26 34nt was separated using polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis without xxx  and the corresponding bands were collected. The recovered bands were subjected to ligation reaction  where a preadenylylated and 3\u2019 blocked linker 5\u2019 rApp CTGTAGGCACCATCAAT NH2 3\u2019 was attached to the three prime end of the RNA. The ligated products were then recovered by performing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Subsequently  the recovered RNA fragments were reverse transcribed using a reverse primer to obtain extended cDNA molecules. The purified cDNA was subjected to circularization by using CircLigase Epicentre  CL4111K  resulting in the formation of circular cDNA molecules. To remove residual rRNA components in the cDNA  a method involving hybridization with complementary primers specific to rRNA and subsequent heat denaturation was employed. The remaining circularized cDNA was then amplified through PCR  and barcode sequences were incorporated.", null, "tissue:whole embryo|developmental stage:50% epiboly stage|cell type:embryonic cell|genotype:wild type|treatment:uninjected", "GSM8228802", "GSM8228802: Zebrafish  Riboseq  high dose  uninj2; Danio rerio; OTHER", "GSM8228802 r1", "GSM8228802", "1", "Both control group and dsRNA injected embryos at xxx hpf were thoroughly lysed on ice using lysis buffer.The lysate was then centrifuged at 12000g at 4\u00b0C for 10 minutes to remove cellular components  including undigested material such as cell nuclei.Then  RNaseI was added to the supernatant and incubated at 25\u00b0C for 30 minutes to digest RNA  while the RNA fragments protected by ribosomes were preserved. Subsequently  an RNA inhibitor was added to terminate the digestion reaction. The lysate was subjected to sucrose density gradient centrifugation  and fractions containing single peaks at 260nm wavelength around the 80S monosome region were collected. The collected mixture was then thoroughly lysed using Trizol for RNA extraction. RNA fragments within the size range of 26 34nt was separated using polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis without xxx  and the corresponding bands were collected. The recovered bands were subjected to ligation reaction  where a preadenylylated and three prime blocked linker five prime rApp CTGTAGGCACCATCAAT NH2 three prime was attached to the three prime end of the RNA. The ligated products were then recovered by performing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Subsequently  the recovered RNA fragments were reverse transcribed using a reverse primer to obtain extended cDNA molecules. The purified cDNA was subjected to circularization by using CircLigase Epicentre  CL4111K  resulting in the formation of circular cDNA molecules. To remove residual rRNA components in the cDNA  a method involving hybridization with complementary primers specific to rRNA and subsequent heat denaturation was employed. The remaining circularized cDNA was then amplified through PCR  and barcode sequences were incorporated.", null, "OTHER", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "Illumina NovaSeq 6000", null, "SRP503769", null, null, "un_2.R1.raw.fastq.gz un_2.R2.raw.fastq.gz", "fastq fastq", 13637060056.0, 45155828.0, "GSM8228802 r1", "0:151 1:151", "A:2596015831;C:2388366938;G:6201010197;T:2451085273;N:581817", 151, 151, null, null, 2596015831, 2388366938, 6201010197, 2451085273, 581817, "SRX24354552", "SRS21112320", "SRA1852128", "ShanDong University", "ShanDong University", null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, "T", "T", "mates < 9% mapping rate", "illumina", "novaseq_era", "3prime", "random_priming", "unknown", "bulk", "unknown", "unknown", null, "China", "2024-04-24", "Gastrula", "Embryo", "Whole Organism", "All anatomical structures"], [31946, "SRR28790253", "SRX24354551", "SRS21112319", "SRP503769", "PRJNA1104180", "Double stranded RNA triggers a distinct integrated stress response in the early embryo [RNA seq  Ribo seq]", "GSE265771", "Other", "Double stranded RNA dsRNA is associated with virus infections and is present as by products during the transcription of synthetic mRNA  which has been widely used in gene gain of function studies and serves as a core component in emerging mRNA based therapies1 4. The presence of dsRNA in host cells induces an integrated stress response that functions to prevent virus replication and infection5 6. Unlike differentiated cells  undifferentiated cells adopt a distinct defense strategy against RNA virus infection7  but the mechanism is unclear. We show a previously unidentified response triggered by dsRNA in the early embryo. Although dsRNA causes a global protein translation inhibition in a PKR eIF2a independent manner and leads to developmental delay and cell necrosis  it also strongly induces p53 activation  which then upregulates Interferon Stimulated Genes independently of interferon ligands. Importantly  we demonstrate that the burst of p53 signaling dose not result in cell death but functions as a protective mechanism against deleterious translation blockage by slowing down global protein degradation via ISGylation. Our work has identified a distinct dsRNA induced stress response in the embryo  reflecting an ancient innate immune memory before the establishment of the IFN system. It also raises the provocative question as to the original protective role of p53 during evolution. Overall design: To characterize the distribution of ribosomes on mRNA  we performed Ribosome profiling Ribo seq analysis with RNA seq on dsRNA injected embryos.", null, null, null, "Zebrafish  Riboseq  high dose  uninj1", "GSM8228801", null, "source name:whole embryo|tissue:whole embryo|developmental stage:50% epiboly stage|cell type:embryonic cell|genotype:wild type|treatment:uninjected|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing", "Zebrafish  Riboseq  high dose  uninj1", "The library underwent quality control assessment  and was subjected to Illumina Novaseq 6000 sequencing. Bio informatics analysis of RIBOseq profilling was performed to analyze the library data. Assembly: GRCz10 Supplementary files format and content: Excel file includes raw counts for each Sample Library strategy: Ribo seq", "whole embryo", null, "Both control group and dsRNA injected embryos at xxx hpf were thoroughly lysed on ice using lysis buffer.The lysate was then centrifuged at 12000g at 4\u00b0C for 10 minutes to remove cellular components  including undigested material such as cell nuclei.Then  RNaseI was added to the supernatant and incubated at 25\u00b0C for 30 minutes to digest RNA  while the RNA fragments protected by ribosomes were preserved. Subsequently  an RNA inhibitor was added to terminate the digestion reaction. The lysate was subjected to sucrose density gradient centrifugation  and fractions containing single peaks at 260nm wavelength around the 80S monosome region were collected. The collected mixture was then thoroughly lysed using Trizol for RNA extraction. RNA fragments within the size range of 26 34nt was separated using polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis without xxx  and the corresponding bands were collected. The recovered bands were subjected to ligation reaction  where a preadenylylated and 3\u2019 blocked linker 5\u2019 rApp CTGTAGGCACCATCAAT NH2 3\u2019 was attached to the three prime end of the RNA. The ligated products were then recovered by performing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Subsequently  the recovered RNA fragments were reverse transcribed using a reverse primer to obtain extended cDNA molecules. The purified cDNA was subjected to circularization by using CircLigase Epicentre  CL4111K  resulting in the formation of circular cDNA molecules. To remove residual rRNA components in the cDNA  a method involving hybridization with complementary primers specific to rRNA and subsequent heat denaturation was employed. The remaining circularized cDNA was then amplified through PCR  and barcode sequences were incorporated.", null, "tissue:whole embryo|developmental stage:50% epiboly stage|cell type:embryonic cell|genotype:wild type|treatment:uninjected", "GSM8228801", "GSM8228801: Zebrafish  Riboseq  high dose  uninj1; Danio rerio; OTHER", "GSM8228801 r1", "GSM8228801", "1", "Both control group and dsRNA injected embryos at xxx hpf were thoroughly lysed on ice using lysis buffer.The lysate was then centrifuged at 12000g at 4\u00b0C for 10 minutes to remove cellular components  including undigested material such as cell nuclei.Then  RNaseI was added to the supernatant and incubated at 25\u00b0C for 30 minutes to digest RNA  while the RNA fragments protected by ribosomes were preserved. Subsequently  an RNA inhibitor was added to terminate the digestion reaction. The lysate was subjected to sucrose density gradient centrifugation  and fractions containing single peaks at 260nm wavelength around the 80S monosome region were collected. The collected mixture was then thoroughly lysed using Trizol for RNA extraction. RNA fragments within the size range of 26 34nt was separated using polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis without xxx  and the corresponding bands were collected. The recovered bands were subjected to ligation reaction  where a preadenylylated and three prime blocked linker five prime rApp CTGTAGGCACCATCAAT NH2 three prime was attached to the three prime end of the RNA. The ligated products were then recovered by performing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Subsequently  the recovered RNA fragments were reverse transcribed using a reverse primer to obtain extended cDNA molecules. The purified cDNA was subjected to circularization by using CircLigase Epicentre  CL4111K  resulting in the formation of circular cDNA molecules. To remove residual rRNA components in the cDNA  a method involving hybridization with complementary primers specific to rRNA and subsequent heat denaturation was employed. The remaining circularized cDNA was then amplified through PCR  and barcode sequences were incorporated.", null, "OTHER", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "Illumina NovaSeq 6000", null, "SRP503769", null, null, "un_1.R1.raw.fastq.gz un_1.R2.raw.fastq.gz", "fastq fastq", 13499333560.0, 44699780.0, "GSM8228801 r1", "0:151 1:151", "A:2587725963;C:2439789499;G:6080777505;T:2390460459;N:580134", 151, 151, null, null, 2587725963, 2439789499, 6080777505, 2390460459, 580134, "SRX24354551", "SRS21112319", "SRA1852128", "ShanDong University", "ShanDong University", null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, "T", "T", "mates < 9% mapping rate", "illumina", "novaseq_era", "3prime", "random_priming", "unknown", "bulk", "unknown", "unknown", null, "China", "2024-04-24", "Gastrula", "Embryo", "Whole Organism", "All anatomical structures"], [31947, "SRR28790254", "SRX24354550", "SRS21112318", "SRP503769", "PRJNA1104180", "Double stranded RNA triggers a distinct integrated stress response in the early embryo [RNA seq  Ribo seq]", "GSE265771", "Other", "Double stranded RNA dsRNA is associated with virus infections and is present as by products during the transcription of synthetic mRNA  which has been widely used in gene gain of function studies and serves as a core component in emerging mRNA based therapies1 4. The presence of dsRNA in host cells induces an integrated stress response that functions to prevent virus replication and infection5 6. Unlike differentiated cells  undifferentiated cells adopt a distinct defense strategy against RNA virus infection7  but the mechanism is unclear. We show a previously unidentified response triggered by dsRNA in the early embryo. Although dsRNA causes a global protein translation inhibition in a PKR eIF2a independent manner and leads to developmental delay and cell necrosis  it also strongly induces p53 activation  which then upregulates Interferon Stimulated Genes independently of interferon ligands. Importantly  we demonstrate that the burst of p53 signaling dose not result in cell death but functions as a protective mechanism against deleterious translation blockage by slowing down global protein degradation via ISGylation. Our work has identified a distinct dsRNA induced stress response in the embryo  reflecting an ancient innate immune memory before the establishment of the IFN system. It also raises the provocative question as to the original protective role of p53 during evolution. Overall design: To characterize the distribution of ribosomes on mRNA  we performed Ribosome profiling Ribo seq analysis with RNA seq on dsRNA injected embryos.", null, null, null, "Zebrafish  Riboseq  low dose  dsRNA2", "GSM8228800", null, "source name:whole embryo|tissue:whole embryo|developmental stage:50% epiboly stage|cell type:embryonic cell|genotype:wild type|treatment:dsRNA|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing", "Zebrafish  Riboseq  low dose  dsRNA2", "The library underwent quality control assessment  and was subjected to Illumina Novaseq 6000 sequencing. Bio informatics analysis of RIBOseq profilling was performed to analyze the library data. Assembly: GRCz10 Supplementary files format and content: Excel file includes raw counts for each Sample Library strategy: Ribo seq", "whole embryo", null, "Both control group and dsRNA injected embryos at xxx hpf were thoroughly lysed on ice using lysis buffer.The lysate was then centrifuged at 12000g at 4\u00b0C for 10 minutes to remove cellular components  including undigested material such as cell nuclei.Then  RNaseI was added to the supernatant and incubated at 25\u00b0C for 30 minutes to digest RNA  while the RNA fragments protected by ribosomes were preserved. Subsequently  an RNA inhibitor was added to terminate the digestion reaction. The lysate was subjected to sucrose density gradient centrifugation  and fractions containing single peaks at 260nm wavelength around the 80S monosome region were collected. The collected mixture was then thoroughly lysed using Trizol for RNA extraction. RNA fragments within the size range of 26 34nt was separated using polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis without xxx  and the corresponding bands were collected. The recovered bands were subjected to ligation reaction  where a preadenylylated and 3\u2019 blocked linker 5\u2019 rApp CTGTAGGCACCATCAAT NH2 3\u2019 was attached to the three prime end of the RNA. The ligated products were then recovered by performing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Subsequently  the recovered RNA fragments were reverse transcribed using a reverse primer to obtain extended cDNA molecules. The purified cDNA was subjected to circularization by using CircLigase Epicentre  CL4111K  resulting in the formation of circular cDNA molecules. To remove residual rRNA components in the cDNA  a method involving hybridization with complementary primers specific to rRNA and subsequent heat denaturation was employed. The remaining circularized cDNA was then amplified through PCR  and barcode sequences were incorporated.", null, "tissue:whole embryo|developmental stage:50% epiboly stage|cell type:embryonic cell|genotype:wild type|treatment:dsRNA", "GSM8228800", "GSM8228800: Zebrafish  Riboseq  low dose  dsRNA2; Danio rerio; OTHER", "GSM8228800 r1", "GSM8228800", "1", "Both control group and dsRNA injected embryos at xxx hpf were thoroughly lysed on ice using lysis buffer.The lysate was then centrifuged at 12000g at 4\u00b0C for 10 minutes to remove cellular components  including undigested material such as cell nuclei.Then  RNaseI was added to the supernatant and incubated at 25\u00b0C for 30 minutes to digest RNA  while the RNA fragments protected by ribosomes were preserved. Subsequently  an RNA inhibitor was added to terminate the digestion reaction. The lysate was subjected to sucrose density gradient centrifugation  and fractions containing single peaks at 260nm wavelength around the 80S monosome region were collected. The collected mixture was then thoroughly lysed using Trizol for RNA extraction. RNA fragments within the size range of 26 34nt was separated using polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis without xxx  and the corresponding bands were collected. The recovered bands were subjected to ligation reaction  where a preadenylylated and three prime blocked linker five prime rApp CTGTAGGCACCATCAAT NH2 three prime was attached to the three prime end of the RNA. The ligated products were then recovered by performing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Subsequently  the recovered RNA fragments were reverse transcribed using a reverse primer to obtain extended cDNA molecules. The purified cDNA was subjected to circularization by using CircLigase Epicentre  CL4111K  resulting in the formation of circular cDNA molecules. To remove residual rRNA components in the cDNA  a method involving hybridization with complementary primers specific to rRNA and subsequent heat denaturation was employed. The remaining circularized cDNA was then amplified through PCR  and barcode sequences were incorporated.", null, "OTHER", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "Illumina NovaSeq 6000", null, "SRP503769", null, null, "dsR_2.raw.1.fastq.gz dsR_2.raw.2.fastq.gz", "fastq fastq", 13335544766.0, 44157433.0, "GSM8228800 r1", "0:151 1:151", "A:2383528724;C:2262795235;G:6593680813;T:2094730217;N:809777", 151, 151, null, null, 2383528724, 2262795235, 6593680813, 2094730217, 809777, "SRX24354550", "SRS21112318", "SRA1852128", "ShanDong University", "ShanDong University", null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, "T", "T", "mates < 9% mapping rate", "illumina", "novaseq_era", "3prime", "random_priming", "unknown", "bulk", "unknown", "unknown", null, "China", "2024-04-24", "Gastrula", "Embryo", "Whole Organism", "All anatomical structures"], [31948, "SRR28790255", "SRX24354549", "SRS21112317", "SRP503769", "PRJNA1104180", "Double stranded RNA triggers a distinct integrated stress response in the early embryo [RNA seq  Ribo seq]", "GSE265771", "Other", "Double stranded RNA dsRNA is associated with virus infections and is present as by products during the transcription of synthetic mRNA  which has been widely used in gene gain of function studies and serves as a core component in emerging mRNA based therapies1 4. The presence of dsRNA in host cells induces an integrated stress response that functions to prevent virus replication and infection5 6. Unlike differentiated cells  undifferentiated cells adopt a distinct defense strategy against RNA virus infection7  but the mechanism is unclear. We show a previously unidentified response triggered by dsRNA in the early embryo. Although dsRNA causes a global protein translation inhibition in a PKR eIF2a independent manner and leads to developmental delay and cell necrosis  it also strongly induces p53 activation  which then upregulates Interferon Stimulated Genes independently of interferon ligands. Importantly  we demonstrate that the burst of p53 signaling dose not result in cell death but functions as a protective mechanism against deleterious translation blockage by slowing down global protein degradation via ISGylation. Our work has identified a distinct dsRNA induced stress response in the embryo  reflecting an ancient innate immune memory before the establishment of the IFN system. It also raises the provocative question as to the original protective role of p53 during evolution. Overall design: To characterize the distribution of ribosomes on mRNA  we performed Ribosome profiling Ribo seq analysis with RNA seq on dsRNA injected embryos.", null, null, null, "Zebrafish  Riboseq  low dose  dsRNA1", "GSM8228799", null, "source name:whole embryo|tissue:whole embryo|developmental stage:50% epiboly stage|cell type:embryonic cell|genotype:wild type|treatment:dsRNA|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing", "Zebrafish  Riboseq  low dose  dsRNA1", "The library underwent quality control assessment  and was subjected to Illumina Novaseq 6000 sequencing. Bio informatics analysis of RIBOseq profilling was performed to analyze the library data. Assembly: GRCz10 Supplementary files format and content: Excel file includes raw counts for each Sample Library strategy: Ribo seq", "whole embryo", null, "Both control group and dsRNA injected embryos at xxx hpf were thoroughly lysed on ice using lysis buffer.The lysate was then centrifuged at 12000g at 4\u00b0C for 10 minutes to remove cellular components  including undigested material such as cell nuclei.Then  RNaseI was added to the supernatant and incubated at 25\u00b0C for 30 minutes to digest RNA  while the RNA fragments protected by ribosomes were preserved. Subsequently  an RNA inhibitor was added to terminate the digestion reaction. The lysate was subjected to sucrose density gradient centrifugation  and fractions containing single peaks at 260nm wavelength around the 80S monosome region were collected. The collected mixture was then thoroughly lysed using Trizol for RNA extraction. RNA fragments within the size range of 26 34nt was separated using polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis without xxx  and the corresponding bands were collected. The recovered bands were subjected to ligation reaction  where a preadenylylated and 3\u2019 blocked linker 5\u2019 rApp CTGTAGGCACCATCAAT NH2 3\u2019 was attached to the three prime end of the RNA. The ligated products were then recovered by performing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Subsequently  the recovered RNA fragments were reverse transcribed using a reverse primer to obtain extended cDNA molecules. The purified cDNA was subjected to circularization by using CircLigase Epicentre  CL4111K  resulting in the formation of circular cDNA molecules. To remove residual rRNA components in the cDNA  a method involving hybridization with complementary primers specific to rRNA and subsequent heat denaturation was employed. The remaining circularized cDNA was then amplified through PCR  and barcode sequences were incorporated.", null, "tissue:whole embryo|developmental stage:50% epiboly stage|cell type:embryonic cell|genotype:wild type|treatment:dsRNA", "GSM8228799", "GSM8228799: Zebrafish  Riboseq  low dose  dsRNA1; Danio rerio; OTHER", "GSM8228799 r1", "GSM8228799", "1", "Both control group and dsRNA injected embryos at xxx hpf were thoroughly lysed on ice using lysis buffer.The lysate was then centrifuged at 12000g at 4\u00b0C for 10 minutes to remove cellular components  including undigested material such as cell nuclei.Then  RNaseI was added to the supernatant and incubated at 25\u00b0C for 30 minutes to digest RNA  while the RNA fragments protected by ribosomes were preserved. Subsequently  an RNA inhibitor was added to terminate the digestion reaction. The lysate was subjected to sucrose density gradient centrifugation  and fractions containing single peaks at 260nm wavelength around the 80S monosome region were collected. The collected mixture was then thoroughly lysed using Trizol for RNA extraction. RNA fragments within the size range of 26 34nt was separated using polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis without xxx  and the corresponding bands were collected. The recovered bands were subjected to ligation reaction  where a preadenylylated and three prime blocked linker five prime rApp CTGTAGGCACCATCAAT NH2 three prime was attached to the three prime end of the RNA. The ligated products were then recovered by performing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Subsequently  the recovered RNA fragments were reverse transcribed using a reverse primer to obtain extended cDNA molecules. The purified cDNA was subjected to circularization by using CircLigase Epicentre  CL4111K  resulting in the formation of circular cDNA molecules. To remove residual rRNA components in the cDNA  a method involving hybridization with complementary primers specific to rRNA and subsequent heat denaturation was employed. The remaining circularized cDNA was then amplified through PCR  and barcode sequences were incorporated.", null, "OTHER", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "Illumina NovaSeq 6000", null, "SRP503769", null, null, "dsR_1.raw.1.fastq.gz dsR_1.raw.2.fastq.gz", "fastq fastq", 12530433302.0, 41491501.0, "GSM8228799 r1", "0:151 1:151", "A:2300207705;C:2164355626;G:6050556625;T:2014558360;N:754986", 151, 151, null, null, 2300207705, 2164355626, 6050556625, 2014558360, 754986, "SRX24354549", "SRS21112317", "SRA1852128", "ShanDong University", "ShanDong University", null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, "T", "T", "mates < 9% mapping rate", "illumina", "novaseq_era", "3prime", "random_priming", "unknown", "bulk", "unknown", "unknown", null, "China", "2024-04-24", "Gastrula", "Embryo", "Whole Organism", "All anatomical structures"], [31949, "SRR28790256", "SRX24354548", "SRS21112316", "SRP503769", "PRJNA1104180", "Double stranded RNA triggers a distinct integrated stress response in the early embryo [RNA seq  Ribo seq]", "GSE265771", "Other", "Double stranded RNA dsRNA is associated with virus infections and is present as by products during the transcription of synthetic mRNA  which has been widely used in gene gain of function studies and serves as a core component in emerging mRNA based therapies1 4. The presence of dsRNA in host cells induces an integrated stress response that functions to prevent virus replication and infection5 6. Unlike differentiated cells  undifferentiated cells adopt a distinct defense strategy against RNA virus infection7  but the mechanism is unclear. We show a previously unidentified response triggered by dsRNA in the early embryo. Although dsRNA causes a global protein translation inhibition in a PKR eIF2a independent manner and leads to developmental delay and cell necrosis  it also strongly induces p53 activation  which then upregulates Interferon Stimulated Genes independently of interferon ligands. Importantly  we demonstrate that the burst of p53 signaling dose not result in cell death but functions as a protective mechanism against deleterious translation blockage by slowing down global protein degradation via ISGylation. Our work has identified a distinct dsRNA induced stress response in the embryo  reflecting an ancient innate immune memory before the establishment of the IFN system. It also raises the provocative question as to the original protective role of p53 during evolution. Overall design: To characterize the distribution of ribosomes on mRNA  we performed Ribosome profiling Ribo seq analysis with RNA seq on dsRNA injected embryos.", null, null, null, "Zebrafish  Riboseq  low dose  uninj2", "GSM8228798", null, "source name:whole embryo|tissue:whole embryo|developmental stage:50% epiboly stage|cell type:embryonic cell|genotype:wild type|treatment:uninjected|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing", "Zebrafish  Riboseq  low dose  uninj2", "The library underwent quality control assessment  and was subjected to Illumina Novaseq 6000 sequencing. Bio informatics analysis of RIBOseq profilling was performed to analyze the library data. Assembly: GRCz10 Supplementary files format and content: Excel file includes raw counts for each Sample Library strategy: Ribo seq", "whole embryo", null, "Both control group and dsRNA injected embryos at xxx hpf were thoroughly lysed on ice using lysis buffer.The lysate was then centrifuged at 12000g at 4\u00b0C for 10 minutes to remove cellular components  including undigested material such as cell nuclei.Then  RNaseI was added to the supernatant and incubated at 25\u00b0C for 30 minutes to digest RNA  while the RNA fragments protected by ribosomes were preserved. Subsequently  an RNA inhibitor was added to terminate the digestion reaction. The lysate was subjected to sucrose density gradient centrifugation  and fractions containing single peaks at 260nm wavelength around the 80S monosome region were collected. The collected mixture was then thoroughly lysed using Trizol for RNA extraction. RNA fragments within the size range of 26 34nt was separated using polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis without xxx  and the corresponding bands were collected. The recovered bands were subjected to ligation reaction  where a preadenylylated and 3\u2019 blocked linker 5\u2019 rApp CTGTAGGCACCATCAAT NH2 3\u2019 was attached to the three prime end of the RNA. The ligated products were then recovered by performing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Subsequently  the recovered RNA fragments were reverse transcribed using a reverse primer to obtain extended cDNA molecules. The purified cDNA was subjected to circularization by using CircLigase Epicentre  CL4111K  resulting in the formation of circular cDNA molecules. To remove residual rRNA components in the cDNA  a method involving hybridization with complementary primers specific to rRNA and subsequent heat denaturation was employed. The remaining circularized cDNA was then amplified through PCR  and barcode sequences were incorporated.", null, "tissue:whole embryo|developmental stage:50% epiboly stage|cell type:embryonic cell|genotype:wild type|treatment:uninjected", "GSM8228798", "GSM8228798: Zebrafish  Riboseq  low dose  uninj2; Danio rerio; OTHER", "GSM8228798 r1", "GSM8228798", "1", "Both control group and dsRNA injected embryos at xxx hpf were thoroughly lysed on ice using lysis buffer.The lysate was then centrifuged at 12000g at 4\u00b0C for 10 minutes to remove cellular components  including undigested material such as cell nuclei.Then  RNaseI was added to the supernatant and incubated at 25\u00b0C for 30 minutes to digest RNA  while the RNA fragments protected by ribosomes were preserved. Subsequently  an RNA inhibitor was added to terminate the digestion reaction. The lysate was subjected to sucrose density gradient centrifugation  and fractions containing single peaks at 260nm wavelength around the 80S monosome region were collected. The collected mixture was then thoroughly lysed using Trizol for RNA extraction. RNA fragments within the size range of 26 34nt was separated using polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis without xxx  and the corresponding bands were collected. The recovered bands were subjected to ligation reaction  where a preadenylylated and three prime blocked linker five prime rApp CTGTAGGCACCATCAAT NH2 three prime was attached to the three prime end of the RNA. The ligated products were then recovered by performing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Subsequently  the recovered RNA fragments were reverse transcribed using a reverse primer to obtain extended cDNA molecules. The purified cDNA was subjected to circularization by using CircLigase Epicentre  CL4111K  resulting in the formation of circular cDNA molecules. To remove residual rRNA components in the cDNA  a method involving hybridization with complementary primers specific to rRNA and subsequent heat denaturation was employed. The remaining circularized cDNA was then amplified through PCR  and barcode sequences were incorporated.", null, "OTHER", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "Illumina NovaSeq 6000", null, "SRP503769", null, null, "un_2.raw.1.fastq.gz un_2.raw.2.fastq.gz", "fastq fastq", 12132018896.0, 40172248.0, "GSM8228798 r1", "0:151 1:151", "A:2225485331;C:2027579165;G:5953072417;T:1925141784;N:740199", 151, 151, null, null, 2225485331, 2027579165, 5953072417, 1925141784, 740199, "SRX24354548", "SRS21112316", "SRA1852128", "ShanDong University", "ShanDong University", null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, "T", "T", "mates < 9% mapping rate", "illumina", "novaseq_era", "3prime", "random_priming", "unknown", "bulk", "unknown", "unknown", null, "China", "2024-04-24", "Gastrula", "Embryo", "Whole Organism", "All anatomical structures"], [31950, "SRR28790257", "SRX24354547", "SRS21112315", "SRP503769", "PRJNA1104180", "Double stranded RNA triggers a distinct integrated stress response in the early embryo [RNA seq  Ribo seq]", "GSE265771", "Other", "Double stranded RNA dsRNA is associated with virus infections and is present as by products during the transcription of synthetic mRNA  which has been widely used in gene gain of function studies and serves as a core component in emerging mRNA based therapies1 4. The presence of dsRNA in host cells induces an integrated stress response that functions to prevent virus replication and infection5 6. Unlike differentiated cells  undifferentiated cells adopt a distinct defense strategy against RNA virus infection7  but the mechanism is unclear. We show a previously unidentified response triggered by dsRNA in the early embryo. Although dsRNA causes a global protein translation inhibition in a PKR eIF2a independent manner and leads to developmental delay and cell necrosis  it also strongly induces p53 activation  which then upregulates Interferon Stimulated Genes independently of interferon ligands. Importantly  we demonstrate that the burst of p53 signaling dose not result in cell death but functions as a protective mechanism against deleterious translation blockage by slowing down global protein degradation via ISGylation. Our work has identified a distinct dsRNA induced stress response in the embryo  reflecting an ancient innate immune memory before the establishment of the IFN system. It also raises the provocative question as to the original protective role of p53 during evolution. Overall design: To characterize the distribution of ribosomes on mRNA  we performed Ribosome profiling Ribo seq analysis with RNA seq on dsRNA injected embryos.", null, null, null, "Zebrafish  Riboseq  low dose  uninj1", "GSM8228797", null, "source name:whole embryo|tissue:whole embryo|developmental stage:50% epiboly stage|cell type:embryonic cell|genotype:wild type|treatment:uninjected|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing", "Zebrafish  Riboseq  low dose  uninj1", "The library underwent quality control assessment  and was subjected to Illumina Novaseq 6000 sequencing. Bio informatics analysis of RIBOseq profilling was performed to analyze the library data. Assembly: GRCz10 Supplementary files format and content: Excel file includes raw counts for each Sample Library strategy: Ribo seq", "whole embryo", null, "Both control group and dsRNA injected embryos at xxx hpf were thoroughly lysed on ice using lysis buffer.The lysate was then centrifuged at 12000g at 4\u00b0C for 10 minutes to remove cellular components  including undigested material such as cell nuclei.Then  RNaseI was added to the supernatant and incubated at 25\u00b0C for 30 minutes to digest RNA  while the RNA fragments protected by ribosomes were preserved. Subsequently  an RNA inhibitor was added to terminate the digestion reaction. The lysate was subjected to sucrose density gradient centrifugation  and fractions containing single peaks at 260nm wavelength around the 80S monosome region were collected. The collected mixture was then thoroughly lysed using Trizol for RNA extraction. RNA fragments within the size range of 26 34nt was separated using polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis without xxx  and the corresponding bands were collected. The recovered bands were subjected to ligation reaction  where a preadenylylated and 3\u2019 blocked linker 5\u2019 rApp CTGTAGGCACCATCAAT NH2 3\u2019 was attached to the three prime end of the RNA. The ligated products were then recovered by performing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Subsequently  the recovered RNA fragments were reverse transcribed using a reverse primer to obtain extended cDNA molecules. The purified cDNA was subjected to circularization by using CircLigase Epicentre  CL4111K  resulting in the formation of circular cDNA molecules. To remove residual rRNA components in the cDNA  a method involving hybridization with complementary primers specific to rRNA and subsequent heat denaturation was employed. The remaining circularized cDNA was then amplified through PCR  and barcode sequences were incorporated.", null, "tissue:whole embryo|developmental stage:50% epiboly stage|cell type:embryonic cell|genotype:wild type|treatment:uninjected", "GSM8228797", "GSM8228797: Zebrafish  Riboseq  low dose  uninj1; Danio rerio; OTHER", "GSM8228797 r1", "GSM8228797", "1", "Both control group and dsRNA injected embryos at xxx hpf were thoroughly lysed on ice using lysis buffer.The lysate was then centrifuged at 12000g at 4\u00b0C for 10 minutes to remove cellular components  including undigested material such as cell nuclei.Then  RNaseI was added to the supernatant and incubated at 25\u00b0C for 30 minutes to digest RNA  while the RNA fragments protected by ribosomes were preserved. Subsequently  an RNA inhibitor was added to terminate the digestion reaction. The lysate was subjected to sucrose density gradient centrifugation  and fractions containing single peaks at 260nm wavelength around the 80S monosome region were collected. The collected mixture was then thoroughly lysed using Trizol for RNA extraction. RNA fragments within the size range of 26 34nt was separated using polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis without xxx  and the corresponding bands were collected. The recovered bands were subjected to ligation reaction  where a preadenylylated and three prime blocked linker five prime rApp CTGTAGGCACCATCAAT NH2 three prime was attached to the three prime end of the RNA. The ligated products were then recovered by performing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Subsequently  the recovered RNA fragments were reverse transcribed using a reverse primer to obtain extended cDNA molecules. The purified cDNA was subjected to circularization by using CircLigase Epicentre  CL4111K  resulting in the formation of circular cDNA molecules. To remove residual rRNA components in the cDNA  a method involving hybridization with complementary primers specific to rRNA and subsequent heat denaturation was employed. The remaining circularized cDNA was then amplified through PCR  and barcode sequences were incorporated.", null, "OTHER", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "Illumina NovaSeq 6000", null, "SRP503769", null, null, "un_1.raw.1.fastq.gz un_1.raw.2.fastq.gz", "fastq fastq", 10423454802.0, 34514751.0, "GSM8228797 r1", "0:151 1:151", "A:1931094519;C:1788894999;G:5028533789;T:1674294221;N:637274", 151, 151, null, null, 1931094519, 1788894999, 5028533789, 1674294221, 637274, "SRX24354547", "SRS21112315", "SRA1852128", "ShanDong University", "ShanDong University", null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, "T", "T", "mates < 9% mapping rate", "illumina", "novaseq_era", "3prime", "random_priming", "unknown", "bulk", "unknown", "unknown", null, "China", "2024-04-24", "Gastrula", "Embryo", "Whole Organism", "All anatomical structures"], [32033, "SRR28976522", "SRX24505963", "SRS21254128", "SRP506702", "PRJNA1109723", "rbm24a is an organizer component of germ plasm to determine germ cell fate", "GSE267086", "Other", "The  formation of germ cells is a critical issue for the continuation of species. A large group of animals follow a preformation strategy to generate their primordial germ cells PGCs. They produce a set of localized maternal mRNAs and proteins to form phase separated germ plasm that functions as the PGC determinants  but the mechanisms underlying the assembly of germ plasm is poorly understood. This study identifies Rbm24a as an enssential localized germ plasm protein component that controls the formation of large and functional germ plasm granules. Rbm24a is complexed with Buc and interacts with germ plasm mRNAs  which determines the specific grasp of germ plasm mRNAs into the phase separated aggregates. Rbm24a absent granules fail to undergo kinesin dependent transport towards the cleavage furrows  where small particles fuse into large ones. The loss of maternal rbm24a causes the complete degradation of germ plasm components and the disappearance of PGCs  resulting in totally sterile animals. Our work establishes that Rbm24 is a critical nucleating organizer component of germ plasm  highlighting an emerging common mechanism to read and recruit RNA component into phase separated condensates. Overall design: To elucidate the comprehensive RNA binding landscape of Rbm24a in zebrafish  we employed RIP seq analysis on both rbm24a GFP knock in and wild type zebrafish.", null, null, null, "Zebrafish  RIP seq  Rbm24a Knock in IP", "GSM8259538", null, "source name:whole embryo|tissue:whole embryo|developmental stage:4 cell stage|cell type:embryonic cell|genotype:Rbm24a Knock in|antibody:GFP|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing", "Zebrafish  RIP seq  Rbm24a Knock in IP", "Each library was amplified by a 15 cycle PCR  and 150 bp paired end sequencing was subjected to Illumina Nova seq 6000 to obtain the raw data. Assembly: GRCz11 Supplementary files format and content: tab delimited text file includes raw counts for each Sample Supplementary files format and content: Bigwig file for each Sample", "whole embryo", null, "Total RNAs were extracted from WT and Mrbm24a embryos at 4 cell sphere 24 hpf stage  using TRIzol reagent Invitrogen  and were precipitated by cold isopropanol 50%  v/v in the presence of carrier glycogen 20 \u00b5g/each sample. 1 \u03bcg total RNA was used for following library preparation. The polyA mRNA isolation was performed  using OligodT beads. The mRNA and RIP IP RNA fragmentation was performed using divalent cations and high  temperature. Priming was performed using Random Primers. First strand cDNA and the second strand  cDNA were synthesized. The purified double stranded cDNA was then treated to repair both ends and  add a dA tailing in one reaction  followed by a T A ligation to add adaptors to both ends. Size selection of  Adaptor ligated DNA was then performed using DNA Clean Beads. Each sample was then amplified by  PCR using P5 and P7 primers and the PCR products were validated.  Then libraries with different indexs were multiplexed and loaded on an Illumina Nova seq 6000 instrument for sequencing using a 2x150 paired end PE configuration according to  manufacturer\u2019s instructions.", "Zebrafish embryos were maintained in 1/3x Ringer's at 28.5C", "tissue:whole embryo|developmental stage:4 cell stage|cell type:embryonic cell|genotype:Rbm24a Knock in|antibody:GFP", "GSM8259538", "GSM8259538: Zebrafish  RIP seq  Rbm24a Knock in IP; Danio rerio; RIP Seq", "GSM8259538 r1", "GSM8259538", "1", "Total RNAs were extracted from WT and Mrbm24a embryos at 4 cell sphere 24 hpf stage  using TRIzol reagent Invitrogen  and were precipitated by cold isopropanol 50%  v/v in the presence of carrier glycogen 20 \u00b5g/each sample. 1 \u03bcg total RNA was used for following library preparation. The polyA mRNA isolation was performed  using OligodT beads. The mRNA and RIP IP RNA fragmentation was performed using divalent cations and high  temperature. Priming was performed using Random Primers. First strand cDNA and the second strand  cDNA were synthesized. The purified double stranded cDNA was then treated to repair both ends and  add a dA tailing in one reaction  followed by a T A ligation to add adaptors to both ends. Size selection of  Adaptor ligated DNA was then performed using DNA Clean Beads. Each sample was then amplified by  PCR using P5 and P7 primers and the PCR products were validated.  Then libraries with different indexs were multiplexed and loaded on an Illumina Nova seq 6000 instrument for sequencing using a 2x150 paired end PE configuration according to  manufacturer's instructions.", null, "RIP-Seq", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "Illumina NovaSeq 6000", null, "SRP506702", null, null, "RIP_KI_IP_R2.fq.gz RIP_KI_IP_R1.fq.gz", "fastq fastq", 6457893104.0, 21383752.0, "GSM8259538 r1", "0:151 1:151", "A:975588225;C:2019180290;G:2469634919;T:992947702;N:541968", 151, 151, null, null, 975588225, 2019180290, 2469634919, 992947702, 541968, "SRX24505963", "SRS21254128", "SRA1863578", "Ang Li, College of Life Sciences, shandong university", "Ang Li, College of Life Sciences, shandong university", 2, 0.90304, 0.86018, 0.20083, 0.20471, 0.96382, 0.96743, 0.96102, 0.98876, 151, 151, "B", "B", "biological fallback assumption", "illumina", "novaseq_era", "unknown", "poly_a", "unknown", "bulk", "bulk", "bulk", null, "China", "2024-05-09", "Cleavage", "Embryo", "Whole Organism", "All anatomical structures"], [32034, "SRR28976523", "SRX24505962", "SRS21254127", "SRP506702", "PRJNA1109723", "rbm24a is an organizer component of germ plasm to determine germ cell fate", "GSE267086", "Other", "The  formation of germ cells is a critical issue for the continuation of species. A large group of animals follow a preformation strategy to generate their primordial germ cells PGCs. They produce a set of localized maternal mRNAs and proteins to form phase separated germ plasm that functions as the PGC determinants  but the mechanisms underlying the assembly of germ plasm is poorly understood. This study identifies Rbm24a as an enssential localized germ plasm protein component that controls the formation of large and functional germ plasm granules. Rbm24a is complexed with Buc and interacts with germ plasm mRNAs  which determines the specific grasp of germ plasm mRNAs into the phase separated aggregates. Rbm24a absent granules fail to undergo kinesin dependent transport towards the cleavage furrows  where small particles fuse into large ones. The loss of maternal rbm24a causes the complete degradation of germ plasm components and the disappearance of PGCs  resulting in totally sterile animals. Our work establishes that Rbm24 is a critical nucleating organizer component of germ plasm  highlighting an emerging common mechanism to read and recruit RNA component into phase separated condensates. Overall design: To elucidate the comprehensive RNA binding landscape of Rbm24a in zebrafish  we employed RIP seq analysis on both rbm24a GFP knock in and wild type zebrafish.", null, null, null, "Zebrafish  RIP seq  wild type IP", "GSM8259537", null, "source name:whole embryo|tissue:whole embryo|developmental stage:4 cell stage|cell type:embryonic cell|genotype:wild type|antibody:GFP|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing", "Zebrafish  RIP seq  wild type IP", "Each library was amplified by a 15 cycle PCR  and 150 bp paired end sequencing was subjected to Illumina Nova seq 6000 to obtain the raw data. Assembly: GRCz11 Supplementary files format and content: tab delimited text file includes raw counts for each Sample Supplementary files format and content: Bigwig file for each Sample", "whole embryo", null, "Total RNAs were extracted from WT and Mrbm24a embryos at 4 cell sphere 24 hpf stage  using TRIzol reagent Invitrogen  and were precipitated by cold isopropanol 50%  v/v in the presence of carrier glycogen 20 \u00b5g/each sample. 1 \u03bcg total RNA was used for following library preparation. The polyA mRNA isolation was performed  using OligodT beads. The mRNA and RIP IP RNA fragmentation was performed using divalent cations and high  temperature. Priming was performed using Random Primers. First strand cDNA and the second strand  cDNA were synthesized. The purified double stranded cDNA was then treated to repair both ends and  add a dA tailing in one reaction  followed by a T A ligation to add adaptors to both ends. Size selection of  Adaptor ligated DNA was then performed using DNA Clean Beads. Each sample was then amplified by  PCR using P5 and P7 primers and the PCR products were validated.  Then libraries with different indexs were multiplexed and loaded on an Illumina Nova seq 6000 instrument for sequencing using a 2x150 paired end PE configuration according to  manufacturer\u2019s instructions.", "Zebrafish embryos were maintained in 1/3x Ringer's at 28.5C", "tissue:whole embryo|developmental stage:4 cell stage|cell type:embryonic cell|genotype:wild type|antibody:GFP", "GSM8259537", "GSM8259537: Zebrafish  RIP seq  wild type IP; Danio rerio; RIP Seq", "GSM8259537 r1", "GSM8259537", "1", "Total RNAs were extracted from WT and Mrbm24a embryos at 4 cell sphere 24 hpf stage  using TRIzol reagent Invitrogen  and were precipitated by cold isopropanol 50%  v/v in the presence of carrier glycogen 20 \u00b5g/each sample. 1 \u03bcg total RNA was used for following library preparation. The polyA mRNA isolation was performed  using OligodT beads. The mRNA and RIP IP RNA fragmentation was performed using divalent cations and high  temperature. Priming was performed using Random Primers. First strand cDNA and the second strand  cDNA were synthesized. The purified double stranded cDNA was then treated to repair both ends and  add a dA tailing in one reaction  followed by a T A ligation to add adaptors to both ends. Size selection of  Adaptor ligated DNA was then performed using DNA Clean Beads. Each sample was then amplified by  PCR using P5 and P7 primers and the PCR products were validated.  Then libraries with different indexs were multiplexed and loaded on an Illumina Nova seq 6000 instrument for sequencing using a 2x150 paired end PE configuration according to  manufacturer's instructions.", null, "RIP-Seq", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "Illumina NovaSeq 6000", null, "SRP506702", null, null, "RIP_WT_IP_R2.fq.gz RIP_WT_IP_R1.fq.gz", "fastq fastq", 4501412680.0, 14905340.0, "GSM8259537 r1", "0:151 1:151", "A:651609366;C:1285679784;G:1901211768;T:662533141;N:378621", 151, 151, null, null, 651609366, 1285679784, 1901211768, 662533141, 378621, "SRX24505962", "SRS21254127", "SRA1863578", "Ang Li, College of Life Sciences, shandong university", "Ang Li, College of Life Sciences, shandong university", 2, 0.96426, 0.81361, 0.26579, 0.2253, 0.97784, 0.97806, 0.8699, 0.93379, 151, 151, "B", "B", "biological fallback assumption", "illumina", "novaseq_era", "unknown", "poly_a", "unknown", "bulk", "bulk", "bulk", null, "China", "2024-05-09", "Cleavage", "Embryo", "Whole Organism", "All anatomical structures"], [32035, "SRR28976524", "SRX24505961", "SRS21254126", "SRP506702", "PRJNA1109723", "rbm24a is an organizer component of germ plasm to determine germ cell fate", "GSE267086", "Other", "The  formation of germ cells is a critical issue for the continuation of species. A large group of animals follow a preformation strategy to generate their primordial germ cells PGCs. They produce a set of localized maternal mRNAs and proteins to form phase separated germ plasm that functions as the PGC determinants  but the mechanisms underlying the assembly of germ plasm is poorly understood. This study identifies Rbm24a as an enssential localized germ plasm protein component that controls the formation of large and functional germ plasm granules. Rbm24a is complexed with Buc and interacts with germ plasm mRNAs  which determines the specific grasp of germ plasm mRNAs into the phase separated aggregates. Rbm24a absent granules fail to undergo kinesin dependent transport towards the cleavage furrows  where small particles fuse into large ones. The loss of maternal rbm24a causes the complete degradation of germ plasm components and the disappearance of PGCs  resulting in totally sterile animals. Our work establishes that Rbm24 is a critical nucleating organizer component of germ plasm  highlighting an emerging common mechanism to read and recruit RNA component into phase separated condensates. Overall design: To elucidate the comprehensive RNA binding landscape of Rbm24a in zebrafish  we employed RIP seq analysis on both rbm24a GFP knock in and wild type zebrafish.", null, null, null, "Zebrafish  RIP seq  Rbm24a Knock in input", "GSM8259536", null, "source name:whole embryo|tissue:whole embryo|developmental stage:4 cell stage|cell type:embryonic cell|genotype:Rbm24a Knock in|antibody:input|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing", "Zebrafish  RIP seq  Rbm24a Knock in input", "Each library was amplified by a 15 cycle PCR  and 150 bp paired end sequencing was subjected to Illumina Nova seq 6000 to obtain the raw data. Assembly: GRCz11 Supplementary files format and content: tab delimited text file includes raw counts for each Sample Supplementary files format and content: Bigwig file for each Sample", "whole embryo", null, "Total RNAs were extracted from WT and Mrbm24a embryos at 4 cell sphere 24 hpf stage  using TRIzol reagent Invitrogen  and were precipitated by cold isopropanol 50%  v/v in the presence of carrier glycogen 20 \u00b5g/each sample. 1 \u03bcg total RNA was used for following library preparation. The polyA mRNA isolation was performed  using OligodT beads. The mRNA and RIP IP RNA fragmentation was performed using divalent cations and high  temperature. Priming was performed using Random Primers. First strand cDNA and the second strand  cDNA were synthesized. The purified double stranded cDNA was then treated to repair both ends and  add a dA tailing in one reaction  followed by a T A ligation to add adaptors to both ends. Size selection of  Adaptor ligated DNA was then performed using DNA Clean Beads. Each sample was then amplified by  PCR using P5 and P7 primers and the PCR products were validated.  Then libraries with different indexs were multiplexed and loaded on an Illumina Nova seq 6000 instrument for sequencing using a 2x150 paired end PE configuration according to  manufacturer\u2019s instructions.", "Zebrafish embryos were maintained in 1/3x Ringer's at 28.5C", "tissue:whole embryo|developmental stage:4 cell stage|cell type:embryonic cell|genotype:Rbm24a Knock in|antibody:input", "GSM8259536", "GSM8259536: Zebrafish  RIP seq  Rbm24a Knock in input; Danio rerio; RIP Seq", "GSM8259536 r1", "GSM8259536", "1", "Total RNAs were extracted from WT and Mrbm24a embryos at 4 cell sphere 24 hpf stage  using TRIzol reagent Invitrogen  and were precipitated by cold isopropanol 50%  v/v in the presence of carrier glycogen 20 \u00b5g/each sample. 1 \u03bcg total RNA was used for following library preparation. The polyA mRNA isolation was performed  using OligodT beads. The mRNA and RIP IP RNA fragmentation was performed using divalent cations and high  temperature. Priming was performed using Random Primers. First strand cDNA and the second strand  cDNA were synthesized. The purified double stranded cDNA was then treated to repair both ends and  add a dA tailing in one reaction  followed by a T A ligation to add adaptors to both ends. Size selection of  Adaptor ligated DNA was then performed using DNA Clean Beads. Each sample was then amplified by  PCR using P5 and P7 primers and the PCR products were validated.  Then libraries with different indexs were multiplexed and loaded on an Illumina Nova seq 6000 instrument for sequencing using a 2x150 paired end PE configuration according to  manufacturer's instructions.", null, "RIP-Seq", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "Illumina NovaSeq 6000", null, "SRP506702", null, null, "RIP_KI_Input_R2.fq.gz RIP_KI_Input_R1.fq.gz", "fastq fastq", 9539398726.0, 31587413.0, "GSM8259536 r1", "0:151 1:151", "A:2233069830;C:2078359171;G:3009942870;T:2217201959;N:824896", 151, 151, null, null, 2233069830, 2078359171, 3009942870, 2217201959, 824896, "SRX24505961", "SRS21254126", "SRA1863578", "Ang Li, College of Life Sciences, shandong university", "Ang Li, College of Life Sciences, shandong university", 2, 0.90112, 0.81448, 0.02415, 0.01993, 0.79287, 0.79807, 0.47884, 0.48186, 151, 151, "B", "B", "biological fallback assumption", "illumina", "novaseq_era", "unknown", "poly_a", "unknown", "bulk", "bulk", "bulk", null, "China", "2024-05-09", "Cleavage", "Embryo", "Whole Organism", "All anatomical structures"], [32036, "SRR28976525", "SRX24505960", "SRS21254125", "SRP506702", "PRJNA1109723", "rbm24a is an organizer component of germ plasm to determine germ cell fate", "GSE267086", "Other", "The  formation of germ cells is a critical issue for the continuation of species. A large group of animals follow a preformation strategy to generate their primordial germ cells PGCs. They produce a set of localized maternal mRNAs and proteins to form phase separated germ plasm that functions as the PGC determinants  but the mechanisms underlying the assembly of germ plasm is poorly understood. This study identifies Rbm24a as an enssential localized germ plasm protein component that controls the formation of large and functional germ plasm granules. Rbm24a is complexed with Buc and interacts with germ plasm mRNAs  which determines the specific grasp of germ plasm mRNAs into the phase separated aggregates. Rbm24a absent granules fail to undergo kinesin dependent transport towards the cleavage furrows  where small particles fuse into large ones. The loss of maternal rbm24a causes the complete degradation of germ plasm components and the disappearance of PGCs  resulting in totally sterile animals. Our work establishes that Rbm24 is a critical nucleating organizer component of germ plasm  highlighting an emerging common mechanism to read and recruit RNA component into phase separated condensates. Overall design: To elucidate the comprehensive RNA binding landscape of Rbm24a in zebrafish  we employed RIP seq analysis on both rbm24a GFP knock in and wild type zebrafish.", null, null, null, "Zebrafish  RIP seq  wild type input", "GSM8259535", null, "source name:whole embryo|tissue:whole embryo|developmental stage:4 cell stage|cell type:embryonic cell|genotype:wild type|antibody:input|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing", "Zebrafish  RIP seq  wild type input", "Each library was amplified by a 15 cycle PCR  and 150 bp paired end sequencing was subjected to Illumina Nova seq 6000 to obtain the raw data. Assembly: GRCz11 Supplementary files format and content: tab delimited text file includes raw counts for each Sample Supplementary files format and content: Bigwig file for each Sample", "whole embryo", null, "Total RNAs were extracted from WT and Mrbm24a embryos at 4 cell sphere 24 hpf stage  using TRIzol reagent Invitrogen  and were precipitated by cold isopropanol 50%  v/v in the presence of carrier glycogen 20 \u00b5g/each sample. 1 \u03bcg total RNA was used for following library preparation. The polyA mRNA isolation was performed  using OligodT beads. The mRNA and RIP IP RNA fragmentation was performed using divalent cations and high  temperature. Priming was performed using Random Primers. First strand cDNA and the second strand  cDNA were synthesized. The purified double stranded cDNA was then treated to repair both ends and  add a dA tailing in one reaction  followed by a T A ligation to add adaptors to both ends. Size selection of  Adaptor ligated DNA was then performed using DNA Clean Beads. Each sample was then amplified by  PCR using P5 and P7 primers and the PCR products were validated.  Then libraries with different indexs were multiplexed and loaded on an Illumina Nova seq 6000 instrument for sequencing using a 2x150 paired end PE configuration according to  manufacturer\u2019s instructions.", "Zebrafish embryos were maintained in 1/3x Ringer's at 28.5C", "tissue:whole embryo|developmental stage:4 cell stage|cell type:embryonic cell|genotype:wild type|antibody:input", "GSM8259535", "GSM8259535: Zebrafish  RIP seq  wild type input; Danio rerio; RIP Seq", "GSM8259535 r1", "GSM8259535", "1", "Total RNAs were extracted from WT and Mrbm24a embryos at 4 cell sphere 24 hpf stage  using TRIzol reagent Invitrogen  and were precipitated by cold isopropanol 50%  v/v in the presence of carrier glycogen 20 \u00b5g/each sample. 1 \u03bcg total RNA was used for following library preparation. The polyA mRNA isolation was performed  using OligodT beads. The mRNA and RIP IP RNA fragmentation was performed using divalent cations and high  temperature. Priming was performed using Random Primers. First strand cDNA and the second strand  cDNA were synthesized. The purified double stranded cDNA was then treated to repair both ends and  add a dA tailing in one reaction  followed by a T A ligation to add adaptors to both ends. Size selection of  Adaptor ligated DNA was then performed using DNA Clean Beads. Each sample was then amplified by  PCR using P5 and P7 primers and the PCR products were validated.  Then libraries with different indexs were multiplexed and loaded on an Illumina Nova seq 6000 instrument for sequencing using a 2x150 paired end PE configuration according to  manufacturer's instructions.", null, "RIP-Seq", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "Illumina NovaSeq 6000", null, "SRP506702", null, null, "RIP_WT_Input_R2.fq.gz RIP_WT_Input_R1.fq.gz", "fastq fastq", 14180410302.0, 46955001.0, "GSM8259535 r1", "0:151 1:151", "A:3380011534;C:2883841476;G:4593876270;T:3321465622;N:1215400", 151, 151, null, null, 3380011534, 2883841476, 4593876270, 3321465622, 1215400, "SRX24505960", "SRS21254125", "SRA1863578", "Ang Li, College of Life Sciences, shandong university", "Ang Li, College of Life Sciences, shandong university", 2, 0.86497, 0.64685, 0.04432, 0.02854, 0.79324, 0.8031, 0.52927, 0.53304, 151, 151, "B", "B", "mate2-mate1 similar by mapping diff", "illumina", "novaseq_era", "unknown", "poly_a", "unknown", "bulk", "bulk", "bulk", null, "China", "2024-05-09", "Cleavage", "Embryo", "Whole Organism", "All anatomical structures"], [32725, "SRR29398864", "SRX24912671", "SRS21618605", "SRP513754", "PRJNA1123686", "Cell state transitions are decoupled from cell division during early embryo development [I]", "GSE269784", "Other", "As tissues develop  cells divide and differentiate concurrently. Conflicting evidence shows that cell division is either dispensable or required for formation of cell types. To determine the role of cell division in differentiation  we arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos using two independent approaches and profiled them at single cell resolution. We show that cell division is dispensable for differentiation of all embryonic tissues during initial cell type differentiation from early gastrulation to the end of segmentation. However  in the absence of cell division  differentiation slows down in some cell types  and cells exhibit global stress responses. While differentiation is robust to blocking cell division  the proportions of cells across cell states are not but show evidence of partial compensation. This work clarifies our understanding of the role of cell division in development and showcases the utility of combining embryo wide perturbations with single cell RNA sequencing to uncover the role of common biological processes across multiple tissues. Overall design: We arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos at 6 hpf using two independent approaches: a chemical approach hydroxyurea and aphidicolin  HUA and a genetic approach involving a loss of function mutation in the gene emi1 allele hi2648. We tracked differentiation dynamics using single cell RNA sequencing scRNA seq on embryos spanning 6\u201324 hpf for HUA treated and control embryos  and at 24 hpf for emi1 mutant embryos. Overall we have collected multiple replicates for control embryos ABs at 6  8  10  14  18  21 hpf and 24 hpf  for HUA treated at 8  10  14 hpf and 24 hpf and for emi1 mutants at 24 hpf.  Details about the samples can be found in the supplementary file \"sample information.txt\"", null, "pubmed:37546736", null, "Perturbation experiment 3  24 hpf biological replicate 1 to 3  technical replicate 2  3", "GSM8327220", null, "source name:whole embryo|tissue:whole embryo|treatment:control and emi1 homozygous mutants|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing", "Perturbation experiment 3  24 hpf biological replicate 1 to 3  technical replicate 2  3", "Multiple samples are pooled for each sequencing run. Raw FASTQ were prepared from Illumina bcl files in a format compatible with the inDrops.py pipeline. Each nextseq run results in 16 FASTQ files 4 lanes x 4 reads per lane. For some pooled libraries  sequencing was run twice to get more UMIs per cell and hence we have deposited 16x2 = 32 raw files for those sequencing samples. The illumina library indices of different samples in a run are provided in the meta data. These can be used to demultiplex the raw file into separate libraries. The read files from an inDrops run have the following content: * R1 001.fastq.gz : contains the three prime UTR cDNA read * R2 001.fastq.gz : contains the first half of the cell barcode * R3 001.fastq.gz : contains the library index for demultiplexing libraries * R4 001.fastq.gz : contains the second half of the barcode and the UMI.  All subsequent processing steps from FASTQ files to count matrixes were performed using the custom pipeline for inDrops data analysis github.com/indrops. Single cell transcriptomes were barcoded using inDrops Klein et al  Cell 2015. Standard transcriptome RNA seq libraries were processed as reported in Zilionis et al. Nature Protocol 2016 using inDrops v3 protocol. The transcriptome libraries were sequenced on reads Illumina NextSeq 500. Libraries used standard Illumina sequencing primers and 61 cycles for Read1  14 cycles for Read2  8 cycles each for IndexRead1 and IndexRead2. Raw fastq files was processed using inDrops.py pipeline github.com/indrops/indrops. Sequenced reads were mapped to a zebrafish reference transcriptome built from the zebrafish GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 using bowtie version 1.1.143. To obtain the final counts matrix used for data analysis  total count filters were applied as described in Kukreja et. al. 2024  method section \"Single cell RNA seq Data preprocessing\" Assembly: GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 Supplementary files format and content: Raw counts tsv.gz: cell barcode  gene names  and raw counts for all cells Supplementary files format and content: Metadata metadata.csv: library identity  cell barcode  and associated metadata for all cells   time point  treatment  replicate  annotated cell state  total number of counts  etc Library strategy: inDrops v3 scRNA seq", "whole embryo", "Zebrafish embryos were arrested for cell cycle using two complementary approaches. S phase cell cycle arrest was induced using a cocktail of drugs \u2013 hydroxyurea Sigma Aldrich H8627 5G at 20 mM and aphidicolin Sigma Aldrich A0781 5MG at 150 \u00b5M concentration in 1% dimethyl sulfoxide DMSO in egg water. G2/M phase arrest was induced by crossing heterozygous emi1 wt/mut zebrafish to generate homozygous emi1 mut/mut embryos  referred as hi2648 in the manuscript. Homozygous mutants with cell cycle arrest were screened at 24 hpf as they have very clear phenotype by this time \u2013 these embryos are smaller and have bent tails and the heterozygous mutants and wildtype are indistinguishable.", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", "AB wild type strains were used for all HUA perturbation experiments. Zebrafish mutant line hi2648  a mutant for the gene emi1  was kindly gifted by Dr. Jennifer Rhodes. Embryos were developed within the ambient temperature of Zebrafish development. Time of fertilization at 28.5 C was used to stage each clutch and this was confirmed using morphological features of the embryos. All zebrafish were housed in a facility overseen by the Harvard Medical Area Standing Committee on Animals our IACUC which performs regular inspections and under which we have an approved protocol for all animal procedures.", "tissue:whole embryo|treatment:control and emi1 homozygous mutants", "GSM8327220", "GSM8327220: Perturbation experiment 3  24 hpf biological replicate 1 to 3  technical replicate 2  3; Danio rerio; OTHER", "GSM8327220 r1", "GSM8327220", "1", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", null, "OTHER", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "NextSeq 500", null, "SRP513754", null, null, "pert_exp3_brep1_2_3_trep2_3_S0_L001_R1_001.fastq.gz pert_exp3_brep1_2_3_trep2_3_S0_L001_R2_001.fastq.gz pert_exp3_brep1_2_3_trep2_3_S0_L001_R3_001.fastq.gz pert_exp3_brep1_2_3_trep2_3_S0_L001_R4_001.fastq.gz", "fastq fastq fastq fastq", 10196913181.0, 112053991.0, "GSM8327220 r1", "0:61 1:8 2:8 3:14", "A:1907833453;C:1411947502;G:1388620349;T:2126120065;N:772082", 61, 8, 8, 14, 1907833453, 1411947502, 1388620349, 2126120065, 772082, "SRX24912671", "SRS21618605", "SRA1898111", "Harvard University", "Harvard University", null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, "B", null, "usable mapping rate", "illumina", "nextseq", "unknown", "other", "trueseq", "sc", "single_cell_droplet", "indrops", null, "United States", "2024-06-13", "Multi-stage", "Embryo", "Whole Organism", "All anatomical structures"], [32726, "SRR29398865", "SRX24912671", "SRS21618605", "SRP513754", "PRJNA1123686", "Cell state transitions are decoupled from cell division during early embryo development [I]", "GSE269784", "Other", "As tissues develop  cells divide and differentiate concurrently. Conflicting evidence shows that cell division is either dispensable or required for formation of cell types. To determine the role of cell division in differentiation  we arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos using two independent approaches and profiled them at single cell resolution. We show that cell division is dispensable for differentiation of all embryonic tissues during initial cell type differentiation from early gastrulation to the end of segmentation. However  in the absence of cell division  differentiation slows down in some cell types  and cells exhibit global stress responses. While differentiation is robust to blocking cell division  the proportions of cells across cell states are not but show evidence of partial compensation. This work clarifies our understanding of the role of cell division in development and showcases the utility of combining embryo wide perturbations with single cell RNA sequencing to uncover the role of common biological processes across multiple tissues. Overall design: We arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos at 6 hpf using two independent approaches: a chemical approach hydroxyurea and aphidicolin  HUA and a genetic approach involving a loss of function mutation in the gene emi1 allele hi2648. We tracked differentiation dynamics using single cell RNA sequencing scRNA seq on embryos spanning 6\u201324 hpf for HUA treated and control embryos  and at 24 hpf for emi1 mutant embryos. Overall we have collected multiple replicates for control embryos ABs at 6  8  10  14  18  21 hpf and 24 hpf  for HUA treated at 8  10  14 hpf and 24 hpf and for emi1 mutants at 24 hpf.  Details about the samples can be found in the supplementary file \"sample information.txt\"", null, "pubmed:37546736", null, "Perturbation experiment 3  24 hpf biological replicate 1 to 3  technical replicate 2  3", "GSM8327220", null, "source name:whole embryo|tissue:whole embryo|treatment:control and emi1 homozygous mutants|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing", "Perturbation experiment 3  24 hpf biological replicate 1 to 3  technical replicate 2  3", "Multiple samples are pooled for each sequencing run. Raw FASTQ were prepared from Illumina bcl files in a format compatible with the inDrops.py pipeline. Each nextseq run results in 16 FASTQ files 4 lanes x 4 reads per lane. For some pooled libraries  sequencing was run twice to get more UMIs per cell and hence we have deposited 16x2 = 32 raw files for those sequencing samples. The illumina library indices of different samples in a run are provided in the meta data. These can be used to demultiplex the raw file into separate libraries. The read files from an inDrops run have the following content: * R1 001.fastq.gz : contains the three prime UTR cDNA read * R2 001.fastq.gz : contains the first half of the cell barcode * R3 001.fastq.gz : contains the library index for demultiplexing libraries * R4 001.fastq.gz : contains the second half of the barcode and the UMI.  All subsequent processing steps from FASTQ files to count matrixes were performed using the custom pipeline for inDrops data analysis github.com/indrops. Single cell transcriptomes were barcoded using inDrops Klein et al  Cell 2015. Standard transcriptome RNA seq libraries were processed as reported in Zilionis et al. Nature Protocol 2016 using inDrops v3 protocol. The transcriptome libraries were sequenced on reads Illumina NextSeq 500. Libraries used standard Illumina sequencing primers and 61 cycles for Read1  14 cycles for Read2  8 cycles each for IndexRead1 and IndexRead2. Raw fastq files was processed using inDrops.py pipeline github.com/indrops/indrops. Sequenced reads were mapped to a zebrafish reference transcriptome built from the zebrafish GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 using bowtie version 1.1.143. To obtain the final counts matrix used for data analysis  total count filters were applied as described in Kukreja et. al. 2024  method section \"Single cell RNA seq Data preprocessing\" Assembly: GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 Supplementary files format and content: Raw counts tsv.gz: cell barcode  gene names  and raw counts for all cells Supplementary files format and content: Metadata metadata.csv: library identity  cell barcode  and associated metadata for all cells   time point  treatment  replicate  annotated cell state  total number of counts  etc Library strategy: inDrops v3 scRNA seq", "whole embryo", "Zebrafish embryos were arrested for cell cycle using two complementary approaches. S phase cell cycle arrest was induced using a cocktail of drugs \u2013 hydroxyurea Sigma Aldrich H8627 5G at 20 mM and aphidicolin Sigma Aldrich A0781 5MG at 150 \u00b5M concentration in 1% dimethyl sulfoxide DMSO in egg water. G2/M phase arrest was induced by crossing heterozygous emi1 wt/mut zebrafish to generate homozygous emi1 mut/mut embryos  referred as hi2648 in the manuscript. Homozygous mutants with cell cycle arrest were screened at 24 hpf as they have very clear phenotype by this time \u2013 these embryos are smaller and have bent tails and the heterozygous mutants and wildtype are indistinguishable.", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", "AB wild type strains were used for all HUA perturbation experiments. Zebrafish mutant line hi2648  a mutant for the gene emi1  was kindly gifted by Dr. Jennifer Rhodes. Embryos were developed within the ambient temperature of Zebrafish development. Time of fertilization at 28.5 C was used to stage each clutch and this was confirmed using morphological features of the embryos. All zebrafish were housed in a facility overseen by the Harvard Medical Area Standing Committee on Animals our IACUC which performs regular inspections and under which we have an approved protocol for all animal procedures.", "tissue:whole embryo|treatment:control and emi1 homozygous mutants", "GSM8327220", "GSM8327220: Perturbation experiment 3  24 hpf biological replicate 1 to 3  technical replicate 2  3; Danio rerio; OTHER", "GSM8327220 r1", "GSM8327220", "1", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", null, "OTHER", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "NextSeq 500", null, "SRP513754", null, null, "pert_exp3_brep1_2_3_trep2_3_S0_L002_R1_001.fastq.gz pert_exp3_brep1_2_3_trep2_3_S0_L002_R2_001.fastq.gz pert_exp3_brep1_2_3_trep2_3_S0_L002_R3_001.fastq.gz pert_exp3_brep1_2_3_trep2_3_S0_L002_R4_001.fastq.gz", "fastq fastq fastq fastq", 10073565229.0, 110698519.0, "GSM8327220 r2", "0:61 1:8 2:8 3:14", "A:1882668771;C:1393477449;G:1377270278;T:2098291783;N:901378", 61, 8, 8, 14, 1882668771, 1393477449, 1377270278, 2098291783, 901378, "SRX24912671", "SRS21618605", "SRA1898111", "Harvard University", "Harvard University", null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, "B", null, "usable mapping rate", "illumina", "nextseq", "unknown", "other", "trueseq", "sc", "single_cell_droplet", "indrops", null, "United States", "2024-06-13", "Multi-stage", "Embryo", "Whole Organism", "All anatomical structures"], [32727, "SRR29398866", "SRX24912671", "SRS21618605", "SRP513754", "PRJNA1123686", "Cell state transitions are decoupled from cell division during early embryo development [I]", "GSE269784", "Other", "As tissues develop  cells divide and differentiate concurrently. Conflicting evidence shows that cell division is either dispensable or required for formation of cell types. To determine the role of cell division in differentiation  we arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos using two independent approaches and profiled them at single cell resolution. We show that cell division is dispensable for differentiation of all embryonic tissues during initial cell type differentiation from early gastrulation to the end of segmentation. However  in the absence of cell division  differentiation slows down in some cell types  and cells exhibit global stress responses. While differentiation is robust to blocking cell division  the proportions of cells across cell states are not but show evidence of partial compensation. This work clarifies our understanding of the role of cell division in development and showcases the utility of combining embryo wide perturbations with single cell RNA sequencing to uncover the role of common biological processes across multiple tissues. Overall design: We arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos at 6 hpf using two independent approaches: a chemical approach hydroxyurea and aphidicolin  HUA and a genetic approach involving a loss of function mutation in the gene emi1 allele hi2648. We tracked differentiation dynamics using single cell RNA sequencing scRNA seq on embryos spanning 6\u201324 hpf for HUA treated and control embryos  and at 24 hpf for emi1 mutant embryos. Overall we have collected multiple replicates for control embryos ABs at 6  8  10  14  18  21 hpf and 24 hpf  for HUA treated at 8  10  14 hpf and 24 hpf and for emi1 mutants at 24 hpf.  Details about the samples can be found in the supplementary file \"sample information.txt\"", null, "pubmed:37546736", null, "Perturbation experiment 3  24 hpf biological replicate 1 to 3  technical replicate 2  3", "GSM8327220", null, "source name:whole embryo|tissue:whole embryo|treatment:control and emi1 homozygous mutants|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing", "Perturbation experiment 3  24 hpf biological replicate 1 to 3  technical replicate 2  3", "Multiple samples are pooled for each sequencing run. Raw FASTQ were prepared from Illumina bcl files in a format compatible with the inDrops.py pipeline. Each nextseq run results in 16 FASTQ files 4 lanes x 4 reads per lane. For some pooled libraries  sequencing was run twice to get more UMIs per cell and hence we have deposited 16x2 = 32 raw files for those sequencing samples. The illumina library indices of different samples in a run are provided in the meta data. These can be used to demultiplex the raw file into separate libraries. The read files from an inDrops run have the following content: * R1 001.fastq.gz : contains the three prime UTR cDNA read * R2 001.fastq.gz : contains the first half of the cell barcode * R3 001.fastq.gz : contains the library index for demultiplexing libraries * R4 001.fastq.gz : contains the second half of the barcode and the UMI.  All subsequent processing steps from FASTQ files to count matrixes were performed using the custom pipeline for inDrops data analysis github.com/indrops. Single cell transcriptomes were barcoded using inDrops Klein et al  Cell 2015. Standard transcriptome RNA seq libraries were processed as reported in Zilionis et al. Nature Protocol 2016 using inDrops v3 protocol. The transcriptome libraries were sequenced on reads Illumina NextSeq 500. Libraries used standard Illumina sequencing primers and 61 cycles for Read1  14 cycles for Read2  8 cycles each for IndexRead1 and IndexRead2. Raw fastq files was processed using inDrops.py pipeline github.com/indrops/indrops. Sequenced reads were mapped to a zebrafish reference transcriptome built from the zebrafish GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 using bowtie version 1.1.143. To obtain the final counts matrix used for data analysis  total count filters were applied as described in Kukreja et. al. 2024  method section \"Single cell RNA seq Data preprocessing\" Assembly: GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 Supplementary files format and content: Raw counts tsv.gz: cell barcode  gene names  and raw counts for all cells Supplementary files format and content: Metadata metadata.csv: library identity  cell barcode  and associated metadata for all cells   time point  treatment  replicate  annotated cell state  total number of counts  etc Library strategy: inDrops v3 scRNA seq", "whole embryo", "Zebrafish embryos were arrested for cell cycle using two complementary approaches. S phase cell cycle arrest was induced using a cocktail of drugs \u2013 hydroxyurea Sigma Aldrich H8627 5G at 20 mM and aphidicolin Sigma Aldrich A0781 5MG at 150 \u00b5M concentration in 1% dimethyl sulfoxide DMSO in egg water. G2/M phase arrest was induced by crossing heterozygous emi1 wt/mut zebrafish to generate homozygous emi1 mut/mut embryos  referred as hi2648 in the manuscript. Homozygous mutants with cell cycle arrest were screened at 24 hpf as they have very clear phenotype by this time \u2013 these embryos are smaller and have bent tails and the heterozygous mutants and wildtype are indistinguishable.", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", "AB wild type strains were used for all HUA perturbation experiments. Zebrafish mutant line hi2648  a mutant for the gene emi1  was kindly gifted by Dr. Jennifer Rhodes. Embryos were developed within the ambient temperature of Zebrafish development. Time of fertilization at 28.5 C was used to stage each clutch and this was confirmed using morphological features of the embryos. All zebrafish were housed in a facility overseen by the Harvard Medical Area Standing Committee on Animals our IACUC which performs regular inspections and under which we have an approved protocol for all animal procedures.", "tissue:whole embryo|treatment:control and emi1 homozygous mutants", "GSM8327220", "GSM8327220: Perturbation experiment 3  24 hpf biological replicate 1 to 3  technical replicate 2  3; Danio rerio; OTHER", "GSM8327220 r1", "GSM8327220", "1", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", null, "OTHER", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "NextSeq 500", null, "SRP513754", null, null, "pert_exp3_brep1_2_3_trep2_3_S0_L003_R1_001.fastq.gz pert_exp3_brep1_2_3_trep2_3_S0_L003_R2_001.fastq.gz pert_exp3_brep1_2_3_trep2_3_S0_L003_R3_001.fastq.gz pert_exp3_brep1_2_3_trep2_3_S0_L003_R4_001.fastq.gz", "fastq fastq fastq fastq", 10334862265.0, 113569915.0, "GSM8327220 r3", "0:61 1:8 2:8 3:14", "A:1932620835;C:1429967805;G:1408958497;T:2155416872;N:800806", 61, 8, 8, 14, 1932620835, 1429967805, 1408958497, 2155416872, 800806, "SRX24912671", "SRS21618605", "SRA1898111", "Harvard University", "Harvard University", null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, "B", null, "usable mapping rate", "illumina", "nextseq", "unknown", "other", "trueseq", "sc", "single_cell_droplet", "indrops", null, "United States", "2024-06-13", "Multi-stage", "Embryo", "Whole Organism", "All anatomical structures"], [32728, "SRR29398867", "SRX24912671", "SRS21618605", "SRP513754", "PRJNA1123686", "Cell state transitions are decoupled from cell division during early embryo development [I]", "GSE269784", "Other", "As tissues develop  cells divide and differentiate concurrently. Conflicting evidence shows that cell division is either dispensable or required for formation of cell types. To determine the role of cell division in differentiation  we arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos using two independent approaches and profiled them at single cell resolution. We show that cell division is dispensable for differentiation of all embryonic tissues during initial cell type differentiation from early gastrulation to the end of segmentation. However  in the absence of cell division  differentiation slows down in some cell types  and cells exhibit global stress responses. While differentiation is robust to blocking cell division  the proportions of cells across cell states are not but show evidence of partial compensation. This work clarifies our understanding of the role of cell division in development and showcases the utility of combining embryo wide perturbations with single cell RNA sequencing to uncover the role of common biological processes across multiple tissues. Overall design: We arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos at 6 hpf using two independent approaches: a chemical approach hydroxyurea and aphidicolin  HUA and a genetic approach involving a loss of function mutation in the gene emi1 allele hi2648. We tracked differentiation dynamics using single cell RNA sequencing scRNA seq on embryos spanning 6\u201324 hpf for HUA treated and control embryos  and at 24 hpf for emi1 mutant embryos. Overall we have collected multiple replicates for control embryos ABs at 6  8  10  14  18  21 hpf and 24 hpf  for HUA treated at 8  10  14 hpf and 24 hpf and for emi1 mutants at 24 hpf.  Details about the samples can be found in the supplementary file \"sample information.txt\"", null, "pubmed:37546736", null, "Perturbation experiment 3  24 hpf biological replicate 1 to 3  technical replicate 2  3", "GSM8327220", null, "source name:whole embryo|tissue:whole embryo|treatment:control and emi1 homozygous mutants|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing", "Perturbation experiment 3  24 hpf biological replicate 1 to 3  technical replicate 2  3", "Multiple samples are pooled for each sequencing run. Raw FASTQ were prepared from Illumina bcl files in a format compatible with the inDrops.py pipeline. Each nextseq run results in 16 FASTQ files 4 lanes x 4 reads per lane. For some pooled libraries  sequencing was run twice to get more UMIs per cell and hence we have deposited 16x2 = 32 raw files for those sequencing samples. The illumina library indices of different samples in a run are provided in the meta data. These can be used to demultiplex the raw file into separate libraries. The read files from an inDrops run have the following content: * R1 001.fastq.gz : contains the three prime UTR cDNA read * R2 001.fastq.gz : contains the first half of the cell barcode * R3 001.fastq.gz : contains the library index for demultiplexing libraries * R4 001.fastq.gz : contains the second half of the barcode and the UMI.  All subsequent processing steps from FASTQ files to count matrixes were performed using the custom pipeline for inDrops data analysis github.com/indrops. Single cell transcriptomes were barcoded using inDrops Klein et al  Cell 2015. Standard transcriptome RNA seq libraries were processed as reported in Zilionis et al. Nature Protocol 2016 using inDrops v3 protocol. The transcriptome libraries were sequenced on reads Illumina NextSeq 500. Libraries used standard Illumina sequencing primers and 61 cycles for Read1  14 cycles for Read2  8 cycles each for IndexRead1 and IndexRead2. Raw fastq files was processed using inDrops.py pipeline github.com/indrops/indrops. Sequenced reads were mapped to a zebrafish reference transcriptome built from the zebrafish GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 using bowtie version 1.1.143. To obtain the final counts matrix used for data analysis  total count filters were applied as described in Kukreja et. al. 2024  method section \"Single cell RNA seq Data preprocessing\" Assembly: GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 Supplementary files format and content: Raw counts tsv.gz: cell barcode  gene names  and raw counts for all cells Supplementary files format and content: Metadata metadata.csv: library identity  cell barcode  and associated metadata for all cells   time point  treatment  replicate  annotated cell state  total number of counts  etc Library strategy: inDrops v3 scRNA seq", "whole embryo", "Zebrafish embryos were arrested for cell cycle using two complementary approaches. S phase cell cycle arrest was induced using a cocktail of drugs \u2013 hydroxyurea Sigma Aldrich H8627 5G at 20 mM and aphidicolin Sigma Aldrich A0781 5MG at 150 \u00b5M concentration in 1% dimethyl sulfoxide DMSO in egg water. G2/M phase arrest was induced by crossing heterozygous emi1 wt/mut zebrafish to generate homozygous emi1 mut/mut embryos  referred as hi2648 in the manuscript. Homozygous mutants with cell cycle arrest were screened at 24 hpf as they have very clear phenotype by this time \u2013 these embryos are smaller and have bent tails and the heterozygous mutants and wildtype are indistinguishable.", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", "AB wild type strains were used for all HUA perturbation experiments. Zebrafish mutant line hi2648  a mutant for the gene emi1  was kindly gifted by Dr. Jennifer Rhodes. Embryos were developed within the ambient temperature of Zebrafish development. Time of fertilization at 28.5 C was used to stage each clutch and this was confirmed using morphological features of the embryos. All zebrafish were housed in a facility overseen by the Harvard Medical Area Standing Committee on Animals our IACUC which performs regular inspections and under which we have an approved protocol for all animal procedures.", "tissue:whole embryo|treatment:control and emi1 homozygous mutants", "GSM8327220", "GSM8327220: Perturbation experiment 3  24 hpf biological replicate 1 to 3  technical replicate 2  3; Danio rerio; OTHER", "GSM8327220 r1", "GSM8327220", "1", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", null, "OTHER", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "NextSeq 500", null, "SRP513754", null, null, "pert_exp3_brep1_2_3_trep2_3_S0_L004_R1_001.fastq.gz pert_exp3_brep1_2_3_trep2_3_S0_L004_R2_001.fastq.gz pert_exp3_brep1_2_3_trep2_3_S0_L004_R3_001.fastq.gz pert_exp3_brep1_2_3_trep2_3_S0_L004_R4_001.fastq.gz", "fastq fastq fastq fastq", 10120552533.0, 111214863.0, "GSM8327220 r4", "0:61 1:8 2:8 3:14", "A:1891306008;C:1401185707;G:1383554545;T:2107193563;N:866820", 61, 8, 8, 14, 1891306008, 1401185707, 1383554545, 2107193563, 866820, "SRX24912671", "SRS21618605", "SRA1898111", "Harvard University", "Harvard University", null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, "B", null, "usable mapping rate", "illumina", "nextseq", "unknown", "other", "trueseq", "sc", "single_cell_droplet", "indrops", null, "United States", "2024-06-13", "Multi-stage", "Embryo", "Whole Organism", "All anatomical structures"], [32729, "SRR29398868", "SRX24912670", "SRS21618604", "SRP513754", "PRJNA1123686", "Cell state transitions are decoupled from cell division during early embryo development [I]", "GSE269784", "Other", "As tissues develop  cells divide and differentiate concurrently. Conflicting evidence shows that cell division is either dispensable or required for formation of cell types. To determine the role of cell division in differentiation  we arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos using two independent approaches and profiled them at single cell resolution. We show that cell division is dispensable for differentiation of all embryonic tissues during initial cell type differentiation from early gastrulation to the end of segmentation. However  in the absence of cell division  differentiation slows down in some cell types  and cells exhibit global stress responses. While differentiation is robust to blocking cell division  the proportions of cells across cell states are not but show evidence of partial compensation. This work clarifies our understanding of the role of cell division in development and showcases the utility of combining embryo wide perturbations with single cell RNA sequencing to uncover the role of common biological processes across multiple tissues. Overall design: We arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos at 6 hpf using two independent approaches: a chemical approach hydroxyurea and aphidicolin  HUA and a genetic approach involving a loss of function mutation in the gene emi1 allele hi2648. We tracked differentiation dynamics using single cell RNA sequencing scRNA seq on embryos spanning 6\u201324 hpf for HUA treated and control embryos  and at 24 hpf for emi1 mutant embryos. Overall we have collected multiple replicates for control embryos ABs at 6  8  10  14  18  21 hpf and 24 hpf  for HUA treated at 8  10  14 hpf and 24 hpf and for emi1 mutants at 24 hpf.  Details about the samples can be found in the supplementary file \"sample information.txt\"", null, "pubmed:37546736", null, "Perturbation experiment 3  24 hpf biological replicate 1 to 3  technical replicate 1", "GSM8327219", null, "source name:whole embryo|tissue:whole embryo|treatment:control and emi1 homozygous mutants|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing", "Perturbation experiment 3  24 hpf biological replicate 1 to 3  technical replicate 1", "Multiple samples are pooled for each sequencing run. Raw FASTQ were prepared from Illumina bcl files in a format compatible with the inDrops.py pipeline. Each nextseq run results in 16 FASTQ files 4 lanes x 4 reads per lane. For some pooled libraries  sequencing was run twice to get more UMIs per cell and hence we have deposited 16x2 = 32 raw files for those sequencing samples. The illumina library indices of different samples in a run are provided in the meta data. These can be used to demultiplex the raw file into separate libraries. The read files from an inDrops run have the following content: * R1 001.fastq.gz : contains the three prime UTR cDNA read * R2 001.fastq.gz : contains the first half of the cell barcode * R3 001.fastq.gz : contains the library index for demultiplexing libraries * R4 001.fastq.gz : contains the second half of the barcode and the UMI.  All subsequent processing steps from FASTQ files to count matrixes were performed using the custom pipeline for inDrops data analysis github.com/indrops. Single cell transcriptomes were barcoded using inDrops Klein et al  Cell 2015. Standard transcriptome RNA seq libraries were processed as reported in Zilionis et al. Nature Protocol 2016 using inDrops v3 protocol. The transcriptome libraries were sequenced on reads Illumina NextSeq 500. Libraries used standard Illumina sequencing primers and 61 cycles for Read1  14 cycles for Read2  8 cycles each for IndexRead1 and IndexRead2. Raw fastq files was processed using inDrops.py pipeline github.com/indrops/indrops. Sequenced reads were mapped to a zebrafish reference transcriptome built from the zebrafish GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 using bowtie version 1.1.143. To obtain the final counts matrix used for data analysis  total count filters were applied as described in Kukreja et. al. 2024  method section \"Single cell RNA seq Data preprocessing\" Assembly: GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 Supplementary files format and content: Raw counts tsv.gz: cell barcode  gene names  and raw counts for all cells Supplementary files format and content: Metadata metadata.csv: library identity  cell barcode  and associated metadata for all cells   time point  treatment  replicate  annotated cell state  total number of counts  etc Library strategy: inDrops v3 scRNA seq", "whole embryo", "Zebrafish embryos were arrested for cell cycle using two complementary approaches. S phase cell cycle arrest was induced using a cocktail of drugs \u2013 hydroxyurea Sigma Aldrich H8627 5G at 20 mM and aphidicolin Sigma Aldrich A0781 5MG at 150 \u00b5M concentration in 1% dimethyl sulfoxide DMSO in egg water. G2/M phase arrest was induced by crossing heterozygous emi1 wt/mut zebrafish to generate homozygous emi1 mut/mut embryos  referred as hi2648 in the manuscript. Homozygous mutants with cell cycle arrest were screened at 24 hpf as they have very clear phenotype by this time \u2013 these embryos are smaller and have bent tails and the heterozygous mutants and wildtype are indistinguishable.", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", "AB wild type strains were used for all HUA perturbation experiments. Zebrafish mutant line hi2648  a mutant for the gene emi1  was kindly gifted by Dr. Jennifer Rhodes. Embryos were developed within the ambient temperature of Zebrafish development. Time of fertilization at 28.5 C was used to stage each clutch and this was confirmed using morphological features of the embryos. All zebrafish were housed in a facility overseen by the Harvard Medical Area Standing Committee on Animals our IACUC which performs regular inspections and under which we have an approved protocol for all animal procedures.", "tissue:whole embryo|treatment:control and emi1 homozygous mutants", "GSM8327219", "GSM8327219: Perturbation experiment 3  24 hpf biological replicate 1 to 3  technical replicate 1; Danio rerio; OTHER", "GSM8327219 r1", "GSM8327219", "1", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", null, "OTHER", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "NextSeq 500", null, "SRP513754", null, null, "pert_exp3_brep1_2_3_trep1_S0_L001_R1_001.fastq.gz pert_exp3_brep1_2_3_trep1_S0_L001_R2_001.fastq.gz pert_exp3_brep1_2_3_trep1_S0_L001_R3_001.fastq.gz pert_exp3_brep1_2_3_trep1_S0_L001_R4_001.fastq.gz", "fastq fastq fastq fastq", 11110219029.0, 122090319.0, "GSM8327219 r1", "0:61 1:8 2:8 3:14", "A:2089393711;C:1503585110;G:1499880828;T:2353645774;N:1004036", 61, 8, 8, 14, 2089393711, 1503585110, 1499880828, 2353645774, 1004036, "SRX24912670", "SRS21618604", "SRA1898111", "Harvard University", "Harvard University", null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, "B", null, "usable mapping rate", "illumina", "nextseq", "unknown", "other", "trueseq", "sc", "single_cell_droplet", "indrops", null, "United States", "2024-06-13", "Multi-stage", "Embryo", "Whole Organism", "All anatomical structures"], [32730, "SRR29398869", "SRX24912670", "SRS21618604", "SRP513754", "PRJNA1123686", "Cell state transitions are decoupled from cell division during early embryo development [I]", "GSE269784", "Other", "As tissues develop  cells divide and differentiate concurrently. Conflicting evidence shows that cell division is either dispensable or required for formation of cell types. To determine the role of cell division in differentiation  we arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos using two independent approaches and profiled them at single cell resolution. We show that cell division is dispensable for differentiation of all embryonic tissues during initial cell type differentiation from early gastrulation to the end of segmentation. However  in the absence of cell division  differentiation slows down in some cell types  and cells exhibit global stress responses. While differentiation is robust to blocking cell division  the proportions of cells across cell states are not but show evidence of partial compensation. This work clarifies our understanding of the role of cell division in development and showcases the utility of combining embryo wide perturbations with single cell RNA sequencing to uncover the role of common biological processes across multiple tissues. Overall design: We arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos at 6 hpf using two independent approaches: a chemical approach hydroxyurea and aphidicolin  HUA and a genetic approach involving a loss of function mutation in the gene emi1 allele hi2648. We tracked differentiation dynamics using single cell RNA sequencing scRNA seq on embryos spanning 6\u201324 hpf for HUA treated and control embryos  and at 24 hpf for emi1 mutant embryos. Overall we have collected multiple replicates for control embryos ABs at 6  8  10  14  18  21 hpf and 24 hpf  for HUA treated at 8  10  14 hpf and 24 hpf and for emi1 mutants at 24 hpf.  Details about the samples can be found in the supplementary file \"sample information.txt\"", null, "pubmed:37546736", null, "Perturbation experiment 3  24 hpf biological replicate 1 to 3  technical replicate 1", "GSM8327219", null, "source name:whole embryo|tissue:whole embryo|treatment:control and emi1 homozygous mutants|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing", "Perturbation experiment 3  24 hpf biological replicate 1 to 3  technical replicate 1", "Multiple samples are pooled for each sequencing run. Raw FASTQ were prepared from Illumina bcl files in a format compatible with the inDrops.py pipeline. Each nextseq run results in 16 FASTQ files 4 lanes x 4 reads per lane. For some pooled libraries  sequencing was run twice to get more UMIs per cell and hence we have deposited 16x2 = 32 raw files for those sequencing samples. The illumina library indices of different samples in a run are provided in the meta data. These can be used to demultiplex the raw file into separate libraries. The read files from an inDrops run have the following content: * R1 001.fastq.gz : contains the three prime UTR cDNA read * R2 001.fastq.gz : contains the first half of the cell barcode * R3 001.fastq.gz : contains the library index for demultiplexing libraries * R4 001.fastq.gz : contains the second half of the barcode and the UMI.  All subsequent processing steps from FASTQ files to count matrixes were performed using the custom pipeline for inDrops data analysis github.com/indrops. Single cell transcriptomes were barcoded using inDrops Klein et al  Cell 2015. Standard transcriptome RNA seq libraries were processed as reported in Zilionis et al. Nature Protocol 2016 using inDrops v3 protocol. The transcriptome libraries were sequenced on reads Illumina NextSeq 500. Libraries used standard Illumina sequencing primers and 61 cycles for Read1  14 cycles for Read2  8 cycles each for IndexRead1 and IndexRead2. Raw fastq files was processed using inDrops.py pipeline github.com/indrops/indrops. Sequenced reads were mapped to a zebrafish reference transcriptome built from the zebrafish GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 using bowtie version 1.1.143. To obtain the final counts matrix used for data analysis  total count filters were applied as described in Kukreja et. al. 2024  method section \"Single cell RNA seq Data preprocessing\" Assembly: GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 Supplementary files format and content: Raw counts tsv.gz: cell barcode  gene names  and raw counts for all cells Supplementary files format and content: Metadata metadata.csv: library identity  cell barcode  and associated metadata for all cells   time point  treatment  replicate  annotated cell state  total number of counts  etc Library strategy: inDrops v3 scRNA seq", "whole embryo", "Zebrafish embryos were arrested for cell cycle using two complementary approaches. S phase cell cycle arrest was induced using a cocktail of drugs \u2013 hydroxyurea Sigma Aldrich H8627 5G at 20 mM and aphidicolin Sigma Aldrich A0781 5MG at 150 \u00b5M concentration in 1% dimethyl sulfoxide DMSO in egg water. G2/M phase arrest was induced by crossing heterozygous emi1 wt/mut zebrafish to generate homozygous emi1 mut/mut embryos  referred as hi2648 in the manuscript. Homozygous mutants with cell cycle arrest were screened at 24 hpf as they have very clear phenotype by this time \u2013 these embryos are smaller and have bent tails and the heterozygous mutants and wildtype are indistinguishable.", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", "AB wild type strains were used for all HUA perturbation experiments. Zebrafish mutant line hi2648  a mutant for the gene emi1  was kindly gifted by Dr. Jennifer Rhodes. Embryos were developed within the ambient temperature of Zebrafish development. Time of fertilization at 28.5 C was used to stage each clutch and this was confirmed using morphological features of the embryos. All zebrafish were housed in a facility overseen by the Harvard Medical Area Standing Committee on Animals our IACUC which performs regular inspections and under which we have an approved protocol for all animal procedures.", "tissue:whole embryo|treatment:control and emi1 homozygous mutants", "GSM8327219", "GSM8327219: Perturbation experiment 3  24 hpf biological replicate 1 to 3  technical replicate 1; Danio rerio; OTHER", "GSM8327219 r1", "GSM8327219", "1", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", null, "OTHER", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "NextSeq 500", null, "SRP513754", null, null, "pert_exp3_brep1_2_3_trep1_S0_L002_R1_001.fastq.gz pert_exp3_brep1_2_3_trep1_S0_L002_R2_001.fastq.gz pert_exp3_brep1_2_3_trep1_S0_L002_R3_001.fastq.gz pert_exp3_brep1_2_3_trep1_S0_L002_R4_001.fastq.gz", "fastq fastq fastq fastq", 10960533857.0, 120445427.0, "GSM8327219 r2", "0:61 1:8 2:8 3:14", "A:2060454932;C:1484110501;G:1481072325;T:2320147865;N:1385424", 61, 8, 8, 14, 2060454932, 1484110501, 1481072325, 2320147865, 1385424, "SRX24912670", "SRS21618604", "SRA1898111", "Harvard University", "Harvard University", null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, "B", null, "usable mapping rate", "illumina", "nextseq", "unknown", "other", "trueseq", "sc", "single_cell_droplet", "indrops", null, "United States", "2024-06-13", "Multi-stage", "Embryo", "Whole Organism", "All anatomical structures"], [32731, "SRR29398870", "SRX24912670", "SRS21618604", "SRP513754", "PRJNA1123686", "Cell state transitions are decoupled from cell division during early embryo development [I]", "GSE269784", "Other", "As tissues develop  cells divide and differentiate concurrently. Conflicting evidence shows that cell division is either dispensable or required for formation of cell types. To determine the role of cell division in differentiation  we arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos using two independent approaches and profiled them at single cell resolution. We show that cell division is dispensable for differentiation of all embryonic tissues during initial cell type differentiation from early gastrulation to the end of segmentation. However  in the absence of cell division  differentiation slows down in some cell types  and cells exhibit global stress responses. While differentiation is robust to blocking cell division  the proportions of cells across cell states are not but show evidence of partial compensation. This work clarifies our understanding of the role of cell division in development and showcases the utility of combining embryo wide perturbations with single cell RNA sequencing to uncover the role of common biological processes across multiple tissues. Overall design: We arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos at 6 hpf using two independent approaches: a chemical approach hydroxyurea and aphidicolin  HUA and a genetic approach involving a loss of function mutation in the gene emi1 allele hi2648. We tracked differentiation dynamics using single cell RNA sequencing scRNA seq on embryos spanning 6\u201324 hpf for HUA treated and control embryos  and at 24 hpf for emi1 mutant embryos. Overall we have collected multiple replicates for control embryos ABs at 6  8  10  14  18  21 hpf and 24 hpf  for HUA treated at 8  10  14 hpf and 24 hpf and for emi1 mutants at 24 hpf.  Details about the samples can be found in the supplementary file \"sample information.txt\"", null, "pubmed:37546736", null, "Perturbation experiment 3  24 hpf biological replicate 1 to 3  technical replicate 1", "GSM8327219", null, "source name:whole embryo|tissue:whole embryo|treatment:control and emi1 homozygous mutants|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing", "Perturbation experiment 3  24 hpf biological replicate 1 to 3  technical replicate 1", "Multiple samples are pooled for each sequencing run. Raw FASTQ were prepared from Illumina bcl files in a format compatible with the inDrops.py pipeline. Each nextseq run results in 16 FASTQ files 4 lanes x 4 reads per lane. For some pooled libraries  sequencing was run twice to get more UMIs per cell and hence we have deposited 16x2 = 32 raw files for those sequencing samples. The illumina library indices of different samples in a run are provided in the meta data. These can be used to demultiplex the raw file into separate libraries. The read files from an inDrops run have the following content: * R1 001.fastq.gz : contains the three prime UTR cDNA read * R2 001.fastq.gz : contains the first half of the cell barcode * R3 001.fastq.gz : contains the library index for demultiplexing libraries * R4 001.fastq.gz : contains the second half of the barcode and the UMI.  All subsequent processing steps from FASTQ files to count matrixes were performed using the custom pipeline for inDrops data analysis github.com/indrops. Single cell transcriptomes were barcoded using inDrops Klein et al  Cell 2015. Standard transcriptome RNA seq libraries were processed as reported in Zilionis et al. Nature Protocol 2016 using inDrops v3 protocol. The transcriptome libraries were sequenced on reads Illumina NextSeq 500. Libraries used standard Illumina sequencing primers and 61 cycles for Read1  14 cycles for Read2  8 cycles each for IndexRead1 and IndexRead2. Raw fastq files was processed using inDrops.py pipeline github.com/indrops/indrops. Sequenced reads were mapped to a zebrafish reference transcriptome built from the zebrafish GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 using bowtie version 1.1.143. To obtain the final counts matrix used for data analysis  total count filters were applied as described in Kukreja et. al. 2024  method section \"Single cell RNA seq Data preprocessing\" Assembly: GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 Supplementary files format and content: Raw counts tsv.gz: cell barcode  gene names  and raw counts for all cells Supplementary files format and content: Metadata metadata.csv: library identity  cell barcode  and associated metadata for all cells   time point  treatment  replicate  annotated cell state  total number of counts  etc Library strategy: inDrops v3 scRNA seq", "whole embryo", "Zebrafish embryos were arrested for cell cycle using two complementary approaches. S phase cell cycle arrest was induced using a cocktail of drugs \u2013 hydroxyurea Sigma Aldrich H8627 5G at 20 mM and aphidicolin Sigma Aldrich A0781 5MG at 150 \u00b5M concentration in 1% dimethyl sulfoxide DMSO in egg water. G2/M phase arrest was induced by crossing heterozygous emi1 wt/mut zebrafish to generate homozygous emi1 mut/mut embryos  referred as hi2648 in the manuscript. Homozygous mutants with cell cycle arrest were screened at 24 hpf as they have very clear phenotype by this time \u2013 these embryos are smaller and have bent tails and the heterozygous mutants and wildtype are indistinguishable.", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", "AB wild type strains were used for all HUA perturbation experiments. Zebrafish mutant line hi2648  a mutant for the gene emi1  was kindly gifted by Dr. Jennifer Rhodes. Embryos were developed within the ambient temperature of Zebrafish development. Time of fertilization at 28.5 C was used to stage each clutch and this was confirmed using morphological features of the embryos. All zebrafish were housed in a facility overseen by the Harvard Medical Area Standing Committee on Animals our IACUC which performs regular inspections and under which we have an approved protocol for all animal procedures.", "tissue:whole embryo|treatment:control and emi1 homozygous mutants", "GSM8327219", "GSM8327219: Perturbation experiment 3  24 hpf biological replicate 1 to 3  technical replicate 1; Danio rerio; OTHER", "GSM8327219 r1", "GSM8327219", "1", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", null, "OTHER", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "NextSeq 500", null, "SRP513754", null, null, "pert_exp3_brep1_2_3_trep1_S0_L003_R1_001.fastq.gz pert_exp3_brep1_2_3_trep1_S0_L003_R2_001.fastq.gz pert_exp3_brep1_2_3_trep1_S0_L003_R3_001.fastq.gz pert_exp3_brep1_2_3_trep1_S0_L003_R4_001.fastq.gz", "fastq fastq fastq fastq", 11164280309.0, 122684399.0, "GSM8327219 r3", "0:61 1:8 2:8 3:14", "A:2098548238;C:1513159748;G:1508645874;T:2362720749;N:673730", 61, 8, 8, 14, 2098548238, 1513159748, 1508645874, 2362720749, 673730, "SRX24912670", "SRS21618604", "SRA1898111", "Harvard University", "Harvard University", null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, "B", null, "usable mapping rate", "illumina", "nextseq", "unknown", "other", "trueseq", "sc", "single_cell_droplet", "indrops", null, "United States", "2024-06-13", "Multi-stage", "Embryo", "Whole Organism", "All anatomical structures"], [32732, "SRR29398871", "SRX24912670", "SRS21618604", "SRP513754", "PRJNA1123686", "Cell state transitions are decoupled from cell division during early embryo development [I]", "GSE269784", "Other", "As tissues develop  cells divide and differentiate concurrently. Conflicting evidence shows that cell division is either dispensable or required for formation of cell types. To determine the role of cell division in differentiation  we arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos using two independent approaches and profiled them at single cell resolution. We show that cell division is dispensable for differentiation of all embryonic tissues during initial cell type differentiation from early gastrulation to the end of segmentation. However  in the absence of cell division  differentiation slows down in some cell types  and cells exhibit global stress responses. While differentiation is robust to blocking cell division  the proportions of cells across cell states are not but show evidence of partial compensation. This work clarifies our understanding of the role of cell division in development and showcases the utility of combining embryo wide perturbations with single cell RNA sequencing to uncover the role of common biological processes across multiple tissues. Overall design: We arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos at 6 hpf using two independent approaches: a chemical approach hydroxyurea and aphidicolin  HUA and a genetic approach involving a loss of function mutation in the gene emi1 allele hi2648. We tracked differentiation dynamics using single cell RNA sequencing scRNA seq on embryos spanning 6\u201324 hpf for HUA treated and control embryos  and at 24 hpf for emi1 mutant embryos. Overall we have collected multiple replicates for control embryos ABs at 6  8  10  14  18  21 hpf and 24 hpf  for HUA treated at 8  10  14 hpf and 24 hpf and for emi1 mutants at 24 hpf.  Details about the samples can be found in the supplementary file \"sample information.txt\"", null, "pubmed:37546736", null, "Perturbation experiment 3  24 hpf biological replicate 1 to 3  technical replicate 1", "GSM8327219", null, "source name:whole embryo|tissue:whole embryo|treatment:control and emi1 homozygous mutants|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing", "Perturbation experiment 3  24 hpf biological replicate 1 to 3  technical replicate 1", "Multiple samples are pooled for each sequencing run. Raw FASTQ were prepared from Illumina bcl files in a format compatible with the inDrops.py pipeline. Each nextseq run results in 16 FASTQ files 4 lanes x 4 reads per lane. For some pooled libraries  sequencing was run twice to get more UMIs per cell and hence we have deposited 16x2 = 32 raw files for those sequencing samples. The illumina library indices of different samples in a run are provided in the meta data. These can be used to demultiplex the raw file into separate libraries. The read files from an inDrops run have the following content: * R1 001.fastq.gz : contains the three prime UTR cDNA read * R2 001.fastq.gz : contains the first half of the cell barcode * R3 001.fastq.gz : contains the library index for demultiplexing libraries * R4 001.fastq.gz : contains the second half of the barcode and the UMI.  All subsequent processing steps from FASTQ files to count matrixes were performed using the custom pipeline for inDrops data analysis github.com/indrops. Single cell transcriptomes were barcoded using inDrops Klein et al  Cell 2015. Standard transcriptome RNA seq libraries were processed as reported in Zilionis et al. Nature Protocol 2016 using inDrops v3 protocol. The transcriptome libraries were sequenced on reads Illumina NextSeq 500. Libraries used standard Illumina sequencing primers and 61 cycles for Read1  14 cycles for Read2  8 cycles each for IndexRead1 and IndexRead2. Raw fastq files was processed using inDrops.py pipeline github.com/indrops/indrops. Sequenced reads were mapped to a zebrafish reference transcriptome built from the zebrafish GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 using bowtie version 1.1.143. To obtain the final counts matrix used for data analysis  total count filters were applied as described in Kukreja et. al. 2024  method section \"Single cell RNA seq Data preprocessing\" Assembly: GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 Supplementary files format and content: Raw counts tsv.gz: cell barcode  gene names  and raw counts for all cells Supplementary files format and content: Metadata metadata.csv: library identity  cell barcode  and associated metadata for all cells   time point  treatment  replicate  annotated cell state  total number of counts  etc Library strategy: inDrops v3 scRNA seq", "whole embryo", "Zebrafish embryos were arrested for cell cycle using two complementary approaches. S phase cell cycle arrest was induced using a cocktail of drugs \u2013 hydroxyurea Sigma Aldrich H8627 5G at 20 mM and aphidicolin Sigma Aldrich A0781 5MG at 150 \u00b5M concentration in 1% dimethyl sulfoxide DMSO in egg water. G2/M phase arrest was induced by crossing heterozygous emi1 wt/mut zebrafish to generate homozygous emi1 mut/mut embryos  referred as hi2648 in the manuscript. Homozygous mutants with cell cycle arrest were screened at 24 hpf as they have very clear phenotype by this time \u2013 these embryos are smaller and have bent tails and the heterozygous mutants and wildtype are indistinguishable.", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", "AB wild type strains were used for all HUA perturbation experiments. Zebrafish mutant line hi2648  a mutant for the gene emi1  was kindly gifted by Dr. Jennifer Rhodes. Embryos were developed within the ambient temperature of Zebrafish development. Time of fertilization at 28.5 C was used to stage each clutch and this was confirmed using morphological features of the embryos. All zebrafish were housed in a facility overseen by the Harvard Medical Area Standing Committee on Animals our IACUC which performs regular inspections and under which we have an approved protocol for all animal procedures.", "tissue:whole embryo|treatment:control and emi1 homozygous mutants", "GSM8327219", "GSM8327219: Perturbation experiment 3  24 hpf biological replicate 1 to 3  technical replicate 1; Danio rerio; OTHER", "GSM8327219 r1", "GSM8327219", "1", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", null, "OTHER", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "NextSeq 500", null, "SRP513754", null, null, "pert_exp3_brep1_2_3_trep1_S0_L004_R1_001.fastq.gz pert_exp3_brep1_2_3_trep1_S0_L004_R2_001.fastq.gz pert_exp3_brep1_2_3_trep1_S0_L004_R3_001.fastq.gz pert_exp3_brep1_2_3_trep1_S0_L004_R4_001.fastq.gz", "fastq fastq fastq fastq", 11112051587.0, 122110457.0, "GSM8327219 r4", "0:61 1:8 2:8 3:14", "A:2088203494;C:1504533428;G:1503021684;T:2351948933;N:1030338", 61, 8, 8, 14, 2088203494, 1504533428, 1503021684, 2351948933, 1030338, "SRX24912670", "SRS21618604", "SRA1898111", "Harvard University", "Harvard University", null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, "B", null, "usable mapping rate", "illumina", "nextseq", "unknown", "other", "trueseq", "sc", "single_cell_droplet", "indrops", null, "United States", "2024-06-13", "Multi-stage", "Embryo", "Whole Organism", "All anatomical structures"], [32733, "SRR29398872", "SRX24912669", "SRS21618603", "SRP513754", "PRJNA1123686", "Cell state transitions are decoupled from cell division during early embryo development [I]", "GSE269784", "Other", "As tissues develop  cells divide and differentiate concurrently. Conflicting evidence shows that cell division is either dispensable or required for formation of cell types. To determine the role of cell division in differentiation  we arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos using two independent approaches and profiled them at single cell resolution. We show that cell division is dispensable for differentiation of all embryonic tissues during initial cell type differentiation from early gastrulation to the end of segmentation. However  in the absence of cell division  differentiation slows down in some cell types  and cells exhibit global stress responses. While differentiation is robust to blocking cell division  the proportions of cells across cell states are not but show evidence of partial compensation. This work clarifies our understanding of the role of cell division in development and showcases the utility of combining embryo wide perturbations with single cell RNA sequencing to uncover the role of common biological processes across multiple tissues. Overall design: We arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos at 6 hpf using two independent approaches: a chemical approach hydroxyurea and aphidicolin  HUA and a genetic approach involving a loss of function mutation in the gene emi1 allele hi2648. We tracked differentiation dynamics using single cell RNA sequencing scRNA seq on embryos spanning 6\u201324 hpf for HUA treated and control embryos  and at 24 hpf for emi1 mutant embryos. Overall we have collected multiple replicates for control embryos ABs at 6  8  10  14  18  21 hpf and 24 hpf  for HUA treated at 8  10  14 hpf and 24 hpf and for emi1 mutants at 24 hpf.  Details about the samples can be found in the supplementary file \"sample information.txt\"", null, "pubmed:37546736", null, "Perturbation experiment 2  24 hpf biological replicate 3  technical replicate 1 to 4", "GSM8327218", null, "source name:whole embryo|tissue:whole embryo|treatment:1percent DMSO control and cell cycle arrest at 6 hpf|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing", "Perturbation experiment 2  24 hpf biological replicate 3  technical replicate 1 to 4", "Multiple samples are pooled for each sequencing run. Raw FASTQ were prepared from Illumina bcl files in a format compatible with the inDrops.py pipeline. Each nextseq run results in 16 FASTQ files 4 lanes x 4 reads per lane. For some pooled libraries  sequencing was run twice to get more UMIs per cell and hence we have deposited 16x2 = 32 raw files for those sequencing samples. The illumina library indices of different samples in a run are provided in the meta data. These can be used to demultiplex the raw file into separate libraries. The read files from an inDrops run have the following content: * R1 001.fastq.gz : contains the three prime UTR cDNA read * R2 001.fastq.gz : contains the first half of the cell barcode * R3 001.fastq.gz : contains the library index for demultiplexing libraries * R4 001.fastq.gz : contains the second half of the barcode and the UMI.  All subsequent processing steps from FASTQ files to count matrixes were performed using the custom pipeline for inDrops data analysis github.com/indrops. Single cell transcriptomes were barcoded using inDrops Klein et al  Cell 2015. Standard transcriptome RNA seq libraries were processed as reported in Zilionis et al. Nature Protocol 2016 using inDrops v3 protocol. The transcriptome libraries were sequenced on reads Illumina NextSeq 500. Libraries used standard Illumina sequencing primers and 61 cycles for Read1  14 cycles for Read2  8 cycles each for IndexRead1 and IndexRead2. Raw fastq files was processed using inDrops.py pipeline github.com/indrops/indrops. Sequenced reads were mapped to a zebrafish reference transcriptome built from the zebrafish GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 using bowtie version 1.1.143. To obtain the final counts matrix used for data analysis  total count filters were applied as described in Kukreja et. al. 2024  method section \"Single cell RNA seq Data preprocessing\" Assembly: GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 Supplementary files format and content: Raw counts tsv.gz: cell barcode  gene names  and raw counts for all cells Supplementary files format and content: Metadata metadata.csv: library identity  cell barcode  and associated metadata for all cells   time point  treatment  replicate  annotated cell state  total number of counts  etc Library strategy: inDrops v3 scRNA seq", "whole embryo", "Zebrafish embryos were arrested for cell cycle using two complementary approaches. S phase cell cycle arrest was induced using a cocktail of drugs \u2013 hydroxyurea Sigma Aldrich H8627 5G at 20 mM and aphidicolin Sigma Aldrich A0781 5MG at 150 \u00b5M concentration in 1% dimethyl sulfoxide DMSO in egg water. G2/M phase arrest was induced by crossing heterozygous emi1 wt/mut zebrafish to generate homozygous emi1 mut/mut embryos  referred as hi2648 in the manuscript. Homozygous mutants with cell cycle arrest were screened at 24 hpf as they have very clear phenotype by this time \u2013 these embryos are smaller and have bent tails and the heterozygous mutants and wildtype are indistinguishable.", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", "AB wild type strains were used for all HUA perturbation experiments. Zebrafish mutant line hi2648  a mutant for the gene emi1  was kindly gifted by Dr. Jennifer Rhodes. Embryos were developed within the ambient temperature of Zebrafish development. Time of fertilization at 28.5 C was used to stage each clutch and this was confirmed using morphological features of the embryos. All zebrafish were housed in a facility overseen by the Harvard Medical Area Standing Committee on Animals our IACUC which performs regular inspections and under which we have an approved protocol for all animal procedures.", "tissue:whole embryo|treatment:1percent DMSO control and cell cycle arrest at 6 hpf", "GSM8327218", "GSM8327218: Perturbation experiment 2  24 hpf biological replicate 3  technical replicate 1 to 4; Danio rerio; OTHER", "GSM8327218 r1", "GSM8327218", "1", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", null, "OTHER", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "NextSeq 500", null, "SRP513754", null, null, "pert_exp2_brep3_trep1_to_4_S0_L001_R1_001.fastq.gz pert_exp2_brep3_trep1_to_4_S0_L001_R2_001.fastq.gz pert_exp2_brep3_trep1_to_4_S0_L001_R3_001.fastq.gz pert_exp2_brep3_trep1_to_4_S0_L001_R4_001.fastq.gz", "fastq fastq fastq fastq", 10415939716.0, 114460876.0, "GSM8327218 r1", "0:61 1:8 2:8 3:14", "A:1937284334;C:1499506650;G:1405060643;T:2140026232;N:235577", 61, 8, 8, 14, 1937284334, 1499506650, 1405060643, 2140026232, 235577, "SRX24912669", "SRS21618603", "SRA1898111", "Harvard University", "Harvard University", null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, "B", null, "usable mapping rate", "illumina", "nextseq", "unknown", "other", "trueseq", "sc", "single_cell_droplet", "indrops", null, "United States", "2024-06-13", "Multi-stage", "Embryo", "Whole Organism", "All anatomical structures"], [32734, "SRR29398873", "SRX24912669", "SRS21618603", "SRP513754", "PRJNA1123686", "Cell state transitions are decoupled from cell division during early embryo development [I]", "GSE269784", "Other", "As tissues develop  cells divide and differentiate concurrently. Conflicting evidence shows that cell division is either dispensable or required for formation of cell types. To determine the role of cell division in differentiation  we arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos using two independent approaches and profiled them at single cell resolution. We show that cell division is dispensable for differentiation of all embryonic tissues during initial cell type differentiation from early gastrulation to the end of segmentation. However  in the absence of cell division  differentiation slows down in some cell types  and cells exhibit global stress responses. While differentiation is robust to blocking cell division  the proportions of cells across cell states are not but show evidence of partial compensation. This work clarifies our understanding of the role of cell division in development and showcases the utility of combining embryo wide perturbations with single cell RNA sequencing to uncover the role of common biological processes across multiple tissues. Overall design: We arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos at 6 hpf using two independent approaches: a chemical approach hydroxyurea and aphidicolin  HUA and a genetic approach involving a loss of function mutation in the gene emi1 allele hi2648. We tracked differentiation dynamics using single cell RNA sequencing scRNA seq on embryos spanning 6\u201324 hpf for HUA treated and control embryos  and at 24 hpf for emi1 mutant embryos. Overall we have collected multiple replicates for control embryos ABs at 6  8  10  14  18  21 hpf and 24 hpf  for HUA treated at 8  10  14 hpf and 24 hpf and for emi1 mutants at 24 hpf.  Details about the samples can be found in the supplementary file \"sample information.txt\"", null, "pubmed:37546736", null, "Perturbation experiment 2  24 hpf biological replicate 3  technical replicate 1 to 4", "GSM8327218", null, "source name:whole embryo|tissue:whole embryo|treatment:1percent DMSO control and cell cycle arrest at 6 hpf|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing", "Perturbation experiment 2  24 hpf biological replicate 3  technical replicate 1 to 4", "Multiple samples are pooled for each sequencing run. Raw FASTQ were prepared from Illumina bcl files in a format compatible with the inDrops.py pipeline. Each nextseq run results in 16 FASTQ files 4 lanes x 4 reads per lane. For some pooled libraries  sequencing was run twice to get more UMIs per cell and hence we have deposited 16x2 = 32 raw files for those sequencing samples. The illumina library indices of different samples in a run are provided in the meta data. These can be used to demultiplex the raw file into separate libraries. The read files from an inDrops run have the following content: * R1 001.fastq.gz : contains the three prime UTR cDNA read * R2 001.fastq.gz : contains the first half of the cell barcode * R3 001.fastq.gz : contains the library index for demultiplexing libraries * R4 001.fastq.gz : contains the second half of the barcode and the UMI.  All subsequent processing steps from FASTQ files to count matrixes were performed using the custom pipeline for inDrops data analysis github.com/indrops. Single cell transcriptomes were barcoded using inDrops Klein et al  Cell 2015. Standard transcriptome RNA seq libraries were processed as reported in Zilionis et al. Nature Protocol 2016 using inDrops v3 protocol. The transcriptome libraries were sequenced on reads Illumina NextSeq 500. Libraries used standard Illumina sequencing primers and 61 cycles for Read1  14 cycles for Read2  8 cycles each for IndexRead1 and IndexRead2. Raw fastq files was processed using inDrops.py pipeline github.com/indrops/indrops. Sequenced reads were mapped to a zebrafish reference transcriptome built from the zebrafish GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 using bowtie version 1.1.143. To obtain the final counts matrix used for data analysis  total count filters were applied as described in Kukreja et. al. 2024  method section \"Single cell RNA seq Data preprocessing\" Assembly: GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 Supplementary files format and content: Raw counts tsv.gz: cell barcode  gene names  and raw counts for all cells Supplementary files format and content: Metadata metadata.csv: library identity  cell barcode  and associated metadata for all cells   time point  treatment  replicate  annotated cell state  total number of counts  etc Library strategy: inDrops v3 scRNA seq", "whole embryo", "Zebrafish embryos were arrested for cell cycle using two complementary approaches. S phase cell cycle arrest was induced using a cocktail of drugs \u2013 hydroxyurea Sigma Aldrich H8627 5G at 20 mM and aphidicolin Sigma Aldrich A0781 5MG at 150 \u00b5M concentration in 1% dimethyl sulfoxide DMSO in egg water. G2/M phase arrest was induced by crossing heterozygous emi1 wt/mut zebrafish to generate homozygous emi1 mut/mut embryos  referred as hi2648 in the manuscript. Homozygous mutants with cell cycle arrest were screened at 24 hpf as they have very clear phenotype by this time \u2013 these embryos are smaller and have bent tails and the heterozygous mutants and wildtype are indistinguishable.", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", "AB wild type strains were used for all HUA perturbation experiments. Zebrafish mutant line hi2648  a mutant for the gene emi1  was kindly gifted by Dr. Jennifer Rhodes. Embryos were developed within the ambient temperature of Zebrafish development. Time of fertilization at 28.5 C was used to stage each clutch and this was confirmed using morphological features of the embryos. All zebrafish were housed in a facility overseen by the Harvard Medical Area Standing Committee on Animals our IACUC which performs regular inspections and under which we have an approved protocol for all animal procedures.", "tissue:whole embryo|treatment:1percent DMSO control and cell cycle arrest at 6 hpf", "GSM8327218", "GSM8327218: Perturbation experiment 2  24 hpf biological replicate 3  technical replicate 1 to 4; Danio rerio; OTHER", "GSM8327218 r1", "GSM8327218", "1", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", null, "OTHER", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "NextSeq 500", null, "SRP513754", null, null, "pert_exp2_brep3_trep1_to_4_S0_L002_R1_001.fastq.gz pert_exp2_brep3_trep1_to_4_S0_L002_R2_001.fastq.gz pert_exp2_brep3_trep1_to_4_S0_L002_R3_001.fastq.gz pert_exp2_brep3_trep1_to_4_S0_L002_R4_001.fastq.gz", "fastq fastq fastq fastq", 10347954344.0, 113713784.0, "GSM8327218 r2", "0:61 1:8 2:8 3:14", "A:1929648265;C:1483960768;G:1389914714;T:2132824805;N:192272", 61, 8, 8, 14, 1929648265, 1483960768, 1389914714, 2132824805, 192272, "SRX24912669", "SRS21618603", "SRA1898111", "Harvard University", "Harvard University", null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, "B", null, "usable mapping rate", "illumina", "nextseq", "unknown", "other", "trueseq", "sc", "single_cell_droplet", "indrops", null, "United States", "2024-06-13", "Multi-stage", "Embryo", "Whole Organism", "All anatomical structures"], [32735, "SRR29398874", "SRX24912669", "SRS21618603", "SRP513754", "PRJNA1123686", "Cell state transitions are decoupled from cell division during early embryo development [I]", "GSE269784", "Other", "As tissues develop  cells divide and differentiate concurrently. Conflicting evidence shows that cell division is either dispensable or required for formation of cell types. To determine the role of cell division in differentiation  we arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos using two independent approaches and profiled them at single cell resolution. We show that cell division is dispensable for differentiation of all embryonic tissues during initial cell type differentiation from early gastrulation to the end of segmentation. However  in the absence of cell division  differentiation slows down in some cell types  and cells exhibit global stress responses. While differentiation is robust to blocking cell division  the proportions of cells across cell states are not but show evidence of partial compensation. This work clarifies our understanding of the role of cell division in development and showcases the utility of combining embryo wide perturbations with single cell RNA sequencing to uncover the role of common biological processes across multiple tissues. Overall design: We arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos at 6 hpf using two independent approaches: a chemical approach hydroxyurea and aphidicolin  HUA and a genetic approach involving a loss of function mutation in the gene emi1 allele hi2648. We tracked differentiation dynamics using single cell RNA sequencing scRNA seq on embryos spanning 6\u201324 hpf for HUA treated and control embryos  and at 24 hpf for emi1 mutant embryos. Overall we have collected multiple replicates for control embryos ABs at 6  8  10  14  18  21 hpf and 24 hpf  for HUA treated at 8  10  14 hpf and 24 hpf and for emi1 mutants at 24 hpf.  Details about the samples can be found in the supplementary file \"sample information.txt\"", null, "pubmed:37546736", null, "Perturbation experiment 2  24 hpf biological replicate 3  technical replicate 1 to 4", "GSM8327218", null, "source name:whole embryo|tissue:whole embryo|treatment:1percent DMSO control and cell cycle arrest at 6 hpf|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing", "Perturbation experiment 2  24 hpf biological replicate 3  technical replicate 1 to 4", "Multiple samples are pooled for each sequencing run. Raw FASTQ were prepared from Illumina bcl files in a format compatible with the inDrops.py pipeline. Each nextseq run results in 16 FASTQ files 4 lanes x 4 reads per lane. For some pooled libraries  sequencing was run twice to get more UMIs per cell and hence we have deposited 16x2 = 32 raw files for those sequencing samples. The illumina library indices of different samples in a run are provided in the meta data. These can be used to demultiplex the raw file into separate libraries. The read files from an inDrops run have the following content: * R1 001.fastq.gz : contains the three prime UTR cDNA read * R2 001.fastq.gz : contains the first half of the cell barcode * R3 001.fastq.gz : contains the library index for demultiplexing libraries * R4 001.fastq.gz : contains the second half of the barcode and the UMI.  All subsequent processing steps from FASTQ files to count matrixes were performed using the custom pipeline for inDrops data analysis github.com/indrops. Single cell transcriptomes were barcoded using inDrops Klein et al  Cell 2015. Standard transcriptome RNA seq libraries were processed as reported in Zilionis et al. Nature Protocol 2016 using inDrops v3 protocol. The transcriptome libraries were sequenced on reads Illumina NextSeq 500. Libraries used standard Illumina sequencing primers and 61 cycles for Read1  14 cycles for Read2  8 cycles each for IndexRead1 and IndexRead2. Raw fastq files was processed using inDrops.py pipeline github.com/indrops/indrops. Sequenced reads were mapped to a zebrafish reference transcriptome built from the zebrafish GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 using bowtie version 1.1.143. To obtain the final counts matrix used for data analysis  total count filters were applied as described in Kukreja et. al. 2024  method section \"Single cell RNA seq Data preprocessing\" Assembly: GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 Supplementary files format and content: Raw counts tsv.gz: cell barcode  gene names  and raw counts for all cells Supplementary files format and content: Metadata metadata.csv: library identity  cell barcode  and associated metadata for all cells   time point  treatment  replicate  annotated cell state  total number of counts  etc Library strategy: inDrops v3 scRNA seq", "whole embryo", "Zebrafish embryos were arrested for cell cycle using two complementary approaches. S phase cell cycle arrest was induced using a cocktail of drugs \u2013 hydroxyurea Sigma Aldrich H8627 5G at 20 mM and aphidicolin Sigma Aldrich A0781 5MG at 150 \u00b5M concentration in 1% dimethyl sulfoxide DMSO in egg water. G2/M phase arrest was induced by crossing heterozygous emi1 wt/mut zebrafish to generate homozygous emi1 mut/mut embryos  referred as hi2648 in the manuscript. Homozygous mutants with cell cycle arrest were screened at 24 hpf as they have very clear phenotype by this time \u2013 these embryos are smaller and have bent tails and the heterozygous mutants and wildtype are indistinguishable.", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", "AB wild type strains were used for all HUA perturbation experiments. Zebrafish mutant line hi2648  a mutant for the gene emi1  was kindly gifted by Dr. Jennifer Rhodes. Embryos were developed within the ambient temperature of Zebrafish development. Time of fertilization at 28.5 C was used to stage each clutch and this was confirmed using morphological features of the embryos. All zebrafish were housed in a facility overseen by the Harvard Medical Area Standing Committee on Animals our IACUC which performs regular inspections and under which we have an approved protocol for all animal procedures.", "tissue:whole embryo|treatment:1percent DMSO control and cell cycle arrest at 6 hpf", "GSM8327218", "GSM8327218: Perturbation experiment 2  24 hpf biological replicate 3  technical replicate 1 to 4; Danio rerio; OTHER", "GSM8327218 r1", "GSM8327218", "1", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", null, "OTHER", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "NextSeq 500", null, "SRP513754", null, null, "pert_exp2_brep3_trep1_to_4_S0_L003_R1_001.fastq.gz pert_exp2_brep3_trep1_to_4_S0_L003_R2_001.fastq.gz pert_exp2_brep3_trep1_to_4_S0_L003_R3_001.fastq.gz pert_exp2_brep3_trep1_to_4_S0_L003_R4_001.fastq.gz", "fastq fastq fastq fastq", 10349635660.0, 113732260.0, "GSM8327218 r3", "0:61 1:8 2:8 3:14", "A:1930191842;C:1471248043;G:1399416562;T:2136531503;N:279910", 61, 8, 8, 14, 1930191842, 1471248043, 1399416562, 2136531503, 279910, "SRX24912669", "SRS21618603", "SRA1898111", "Harvard University", "Harvard University", null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, "B", null, "usable mapping rate", "illumina", "nextseq", "unknown", "other", "trueseq", "sc", "single_cell_droplet", "indrops", null, "United States", "2024-06-13", "Multi-stage", "Embryo", "Whole Organism", "All anatomical structures"], [32736, "SRR29398875", "SRX24912669", "SRS21618603", "SRP513754", "PRJNA1123686", "Cell state transitions are decoupled from cell division during early embryo development [I]", "GSE269784", "Other", "As tissues develop  cells divide and differentiate concurrently. Conflicting evidence shows that cell division is either dispensable or required for formation of cell types. To determine the role of cell division in differentiation  we arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos using two independent approaches and profiled them at single cell resolution. We show that cell division is dispensable for differentiation of all embryonic tissues during initial cell type differentiation from early gastrulation to the end of segmentation. However  in the absence of cell division  differentiation slows down in some cell types  and cells exhibit global stress responses. While differentiation is robust to blocking cell division  the proportions of cells across cell states are not but show evidence of partial compensation. This work clarifies our understanding of the role of cell division in development and showcases the utility of combining embryo wide perturbations with single cell RNA sequencing to uncover the role of common biological processes across multiple tissues. Overall design: We arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos at 6 hpf using two independent approaches: a chemical approach hydroxyurea and aphidicolin  HUA and a genetic approach involving a loss of function mutation in the gene emi1 allele hi2648. We tracked differentiation dynamics using single cell RNA sequencing scRNA seq on embryos spanning 6\u201324 hpf for HUA treated and control embryos  and at 24 hpf for emi1 mutant embryos. Overall we have collected multiple replicates for control embryos ABs at 6  8  10  14  18  21 hpf and 24 hpf  for HUA treated at 8  10  14 hpf and 24 hpf and for emi1 mutants at 24 hpf.  Details about the samples can be found in the supplementary file \"sample information.txt\"", null, "pubmed:37546736", null, "Perturbation experiment 2  24 hpf biological replicate 3  technical replicate 1 to 4", "GSM8327218", null, "source name:whole embryo|tissue:whole embryo|treatment:1percent DMSO control and cell cycle arrest at 6 hpf|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing", "Perturbation experiment 2  24 hpf biological replicate 3  technical replicate 1 to 4", "Multiple samples are pooled for each sequencing run. Raw FASTQ were prepared from Illumina bcl files in a format compatible with the inDrops.py pipeline. Each nextseq run results in 16 FASTQ files 4 lanes x 4 reads per lane. For some pooled libraries  sequencing was run twice to get more UMIs per cell and hence we have deposited 16x2 = 32 raw files for those sequencing samples. The illumina library indices of different samples in a run are provided in the meta data. These can be used to demultiplex the raw file into separate libraries. The read files from an inDrops run have the following content: * R1 001.fastq.gz : contains the three prime UTR cDNA read * R2 001.fastq.gz : contains the first half of the cell barcode * R3 001.fastq.gz : contains the library index for demultiplexing libraries * R4 001.fastq.gz : contains the second half of the barcode and the UMI.  All subsequent processing steps from FASTQ files to count matrixes were performed using the custom pipeline for inDrops data analysis github.com/indrops. Single cell transcriptomes were barcoded using inDrops Klein et al  Cell 2015. Standard transcriptome RNA seq libraries were processed as reported in Zilionis et al. Nature Protocol 2016 using inDrops v3 protocol. The transcriptome libraries were sequenced on reads Illumina NextSeq 500. Libraries used standard Illumina sequencing primers and 61 cycles for Read1  14 cycles for Read2  8 cycles each for IndexRead1 and IndexRead2. Raw fastq files was processed using inDrops.py pipeline github.com/indrops/indrops. Sequenced reads were mapped to a zebrafish reference transcriptome built from the zebrafish GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 using bowtie version 1.1.143. To obtain the final counts matrix used for data analysis  total count filters were applied as described in Kukreja et. al. 2024  method section \"Single cell RNA seq Data preprocessing\" Assembly: GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 Supplementary files format and content: Raw counts tsv.gz: cell barcode  gene names  and raw counts for all cells Supplementary files format and content: Metadata metadata.csv: library identity  cell barcode  and associated metadata for all cells   time point  treatment  replicate  annotated cell state  total number of counts  etc Library strategy: inDrops v3 scRNA seq", "whole embryo", "Zebrafish embryos were arrested for cell cycle using two complementary approaches. S phase cell cycle arrest was induced using a cocktail of drugs \u2013 hydroxyurea Sigma Aldrich H8627 5G at 20 mM and aphidicolin Sigma Aldrich A0781 5MG at 150 \u00b5M concentration in 1% dimethyl sulfoxide DMSO in egg water. G2/M phase arrest was induced by crossing heterozygous emi1 wt/mut zebrafish to generate homozygous emi1 mut/mut embryos  referred as hi2648 in the manuscript. Homozygous mutants with cell cycle arrest were screened at 24 hpf as they have very clear phenotype by this time \u2013 these embryos are smaller and have bent tails and the heterozygous mutants and wildtype are indistinguishable.", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", "AB wild type strains were used for all HUA perturbation experiments. Zebrafish mutant line hi2648  a mutant for the gene emi1  was kindly gifted by Dr. Jennifer Rhodes. Embryos were developed within the ambient temperature of Zebrafish development. Time of fertilization at 28.5 C was used to stage each clutch and this was confirmed using morphological features of the embryos. All zebrafish were housed in a facility overseen by the Harvard Medical Area Standing Committee on Animals our IACUC which performs regular inspections and under which we have an approved protocol for all animal procedures.", "tissue:whole embryo|treatment:1percent DMSO control and cell cycle arrest at 6 hpf", "GSM8327218", "GSM8327218: Perturbation experiment 2  24 hpf biological replicate 3  technical replicate 1 to 4; Danio rerio; OTHER", "GSM8327218 r1", "GSM8327218", "1", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", null, "OTHER", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "NextSeq 500", null, "SRP513754", null, null, "pert_exp2_brep3_trep1_to_4_S0_L004_R1_001.fastq.gz pert_exp2_brep3_trep1_to_4_S0_L004_R2_001.fastq.gz pert_exp2_brep3_trep1_to_4_S0_L004_R3_001.fastq.gz pert_exp2_brep3_trep1_to_4_S0_L004_R4_001.fastq.gz", "fastq fastq fastq fastq", 10428481518.0, 114598698.0, "GSM8327218 r4", "0:61 1:8 2:8 3:14", "A:1947321872;C:1488626558;G:1403484811;T:2150802963;N:284374", 61, 8, 8, 14, 1947321872, 1488626558, 1403484811, 2150802963, 284374, "SRX24912669", "SRS21618603", "SRA1898111", "Harvard University", "Harvard University", null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, "B", null, "usable mapping rate", "illumina", "nextseq", "unknown", "other", "trueseq", "sc", "single_cell_droplet", "indrops", null, "United States", "2024-06-13", "Multi-stage", "Embryo", "Whole Organism", "All anatomical structures"], [32737, "SRR29398876", "SRX24912668", "SRS21618601", "SRP513754", "PRJNA1123686", "Cell state transitions are decoupled from cell division during early embryo development [I]", "GSE269784", "Other", "As tissues develop  cells divide and differentiate concurrently. Conflicting evidence shows that cell division is either dispensable or required for formation of cell types. To determine the role of cell division in differentiation  we arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos using two independent approaches and profiled them at single cell resolution. We show that cell division is dispensable for differentiation of all embryonic tissues during initial cell type differentiation from early gastrulation to the end of segmentation. However  in the absence of cell division  differentiation slows down in some cell types  and cells exhibit global stress responses. While differentiation is robust to blocking cell division  the proportions of cells across cell states are not but show evidence of partial compensation. This work clarifies our understanding of the role of cell division in development and showcases the utility of combining embryo wide perturbations with single cell RNA sequencing to uncover the role of common biological processes across multiple tissues. Overall design: We arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos at 6 hpf using two independent approaches: a chemical approach hydroxyurea and aphidicolin  HUA and a genetic approach involving a loss of function mutation in the gene emi1 allele hi2648. We tracked differentiation dynamics using single cell RNA sequencing scRNA seq on embryos spanning 6\u201324 hpf for HUA treated and control embryos  and at 24 hpf for emi1 mutant embryos. Overall we have collected multiple replicates for control embryos ABs at 6  8  10  14  18  21 hpf and 24 hpf  for HUA treated at 8  10  14 hpf and 24 hpf and for emi1 mutants at 24 hpf.  Details about the samples can be found in the supplementary file \"sample information.txt\"", null, "pubmed:37546736", null, "Perturbation experiment 2  24 hpf biological replicate 2  technical replicate 1 to 6", "GSM8327217", null, "source name:whole embryo|tissue:whole embryo|treatment:1percent DMSO control and cell cycle arrest at 6 hpf|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing", "Perturbation experiment 2  24 hpf biological replicate 2  technical replicate 1 to 6", "Multiple samples are pooled for each sequencing run. Raw FASTQ were prepared from Illumina bcl files in a format compatible with the inDrops.py pipeline. Each nextseq run results in 16 FASTQ files 4 lanes x 4 reads per lane. For some pooled libraries  sequencing was run twice to get more UMIs per cell and hence we have deposited 16x2 = 32 raw files for those sequencing samples. The illumina library indices of different samples in a run are provided in the meta data. These can be used to demultiplex the raw file into separate libraries. The read files from an inDrops run have the following content: * R1 001.fastq.gz : contains the three prime UTR cDNA read * R2 001.fastq.gz : contains the first half of the cell barcode * R3 001.fastq.gz : contains the library index for demultiplexing libraries * R4 001.fastq.gz : contains the second half of the barcode and the UMI.  All subsequent processing steps from FASTQ files to count matrixes were performed using the custom pipeline for inDrops data analysis github.com/indrops. Single cell transcriptomes were barcoded using inDrops Klein et al  Cell 2015. Standard transcriptome RNA seq libraries were processed as reported in Zilionis et al. Nature Protocol 2016 using inDrops v3 protocol. The transcriptome libraries were sequenced on reads Illumina NextSeq 500. Libraries used standard Illumina sequencing primers and 61 cycles for Read1  14 cycles for Read2  8 cycles each for IndexRead1 and IndexRead2. Raw fastq files was processed using inDrops.py pipeline github.com/indrops/indrops. Sequenced reads were mapped to a zebrafish reference transcriptome built from the zebrafish GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 using bowtie version 1.1.143. To obtain the final counts matrix used for data analysis  total count filters were applied as described in Kukreja et. al. 2024  method section \"Single cell RNA seq Data preprocessing\" Assembly: GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 Supplementary files format and content: Raw counts tsv.gz: cell barcode  gene names  and raw counts for all cells Supplementary files format and content: Metadata metadata.csv: library identity  cell barcode  and associated metadata for all cells   time point  treatment  replicate  annotated cell state  total number of counts  etc Library strategy: inDrops v3 scRNA seq", "whole embryo", "Zebrafish embryos were arrested for cell cycle using two complementary approaches. S phase cell cycle arrest was induced using a cocktail of drugs \u2013 hydroxyurea Sigma Aldrich H8627 5G at 20 mM and aphidicolin Sigma Aldrich A0781 5MG at 150 \u00b5M concentration in 1% dimethyl sulfoxide DMSO in egg water. G2/M phase arrest was induced by crossing heterozygous emi1 wt/mut zebrafish to generate homozygous emi1 mut/mut embryos  referred as hi2648 in the manuscript. Homozygous mutants with cell cycle arrest were screened at 24 hpf as they have very clear phenotype by this time \u2013 these embryos are smaller and have bent tails and the heterozygous mutants and wildtype are indistinguishable.", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", "AB wild type strains were used for all HUA perturbation experiments. Zebrafish mutant line hi2648  a mutant for the gene emi1  was kindly gifted by Dr. Jennifer Rhodes. Embryos were developed within the ambient temperature of Zebrafish development. Time of fertilization at 28.5 C was used to stage each clutch and this was confirmed using morphological features of the embryos. All zebrafish were housed in a facility overseen by the Harvard Medical Area Standing Committee on Animals our IACUC which performs regular inspections and under which we have an approved protocol for all animal procedures.", "tissue:whole embryo|treatment:1percent DMSO control and cell cycle arrest at 6 hpf", "GSM8327217", "GSM8327217: Perturbation experiment 2  24 hpf biological replicate 2  technical replicate 1 to 6; Danio rerio; OTHER", "GSM8327217 r1", "GSM8327217", "1", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", null, "OTHER", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "NextSeq 500", null, "SRP513754", null, null, "pert_exp2_brep2_trep1_to_6_S0_L001_R1_001.fastq.gz pert_exp2_brep2_trep1_to_6_S0_L001_R2_001.fastq.gz pert_exp2_brep2_trep1_to_6_S0_L001_R3_001.fastq.gz pert_exp2_brep2_trep1_to_6_S0_L001_R4_001.fastq.gz", "fastq fastq fastq fastq", 9307639614.0, 102281754.0, "GSM8327217 r1", "0:61 1:8 2:8 3:14", "A:1721795009;C:1288169328;G:1244888947;T:1984236555;N:97155", 61, 8, 8, 14, 1721795009, 1288169328, 1244888947, 1984236555, 97155, "SRX24912668", "SRS21618601", "SRA1898111", "Harvard University", "Harvard University", null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, "B", null, "usable mapping rate", "illumina", "nextseq", "unknown", "other", "trueseq", "sc", "single_cell_droplet", "indrops", null, "United States", "2024-06-13", "Multi-stage", "Embryo", "Whole Organism", "All anatomical structures"], [32738, "SRR29398877", "SRX24912668", "SRS21618601", "SRP513754", "PRJNA1123686", "Cell state transitions are decoupled from cell division during early embryo development [I]", "GSE269784", "Other", "As tissues develop  cells divide and differentiate concurrently. Conflicting evidence shows that cell division is either dispensable or required for formation of cell types. To determine the role of cell division in differentiation  we arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos using two independent approaches and profiled them at single cell resolution. We show that cell division is dispensable for differentiation of all embryonic tissues during initial cell type differentiation from early gastrulation to the end of segmentation. However  in the absence of cell division  differentiation slows down in some cell types  and cells exhibit global stress responses. While differentiation is robust to blocking cell division  the proportions of cells across cell states are not but show evidence of partial compensation. This work clarifies our understanding of the role of cell division in development and showcases the utility of combining embryo wide perturbations with single cell RNA sequencing to uncover the role of common biological processes across multiple tissues. Overall design: We arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos at 6 hpf using two independent approaches: a chemical approach hydroxyurea and aphidicolin  HUA and a genetic approach involving a loss of function mutation in the gene emi1 allele hi2648. We tracked differentiation dynamics using single cell RNA sequencing scRNA seq on embryos spanning 6\u201324 hpf for HUA treated and control embryos  and at 24 hpf for emi1 mutant embryos. Overall we have collected multiple replicates for control embryos ABs at 6  8  10  14  18  21 hpf and 24 hpf  for HUA treated at 8  10  14 hpf and 24 hpf and for emi1 mutants at 24 hpf.  Details about the samples can be found in the supplementary file \"sample information.txt\"", null, "pubmed:37546736", null, "Perturbation experiment 2  24 hpf biological replicate 2  technical replicate 1 to 6", "GSM8327217", null, "source name:whole embryo|tissue:whole embryo|treatment:1percent DMSO control and cell cycle arrest at 6 hpf|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing", "Perturbation experiment 2  24 hpf biological replicate 2  technical replicate 1 to 6", "Multiple samples are pooled for each sequencing run. Raw FASTQ were prepared from Illumina bcl files in a format compatible with the inDrops.py pipeline. Each nextseq run results in 16 FASTQ files 4 lanes x 4 reads per lane. For some pooled libraries  sequencing was run twice to get more UMIs per cell and hence we have deposited 16x2 = 32 raw files for those sequencing samples. The illumina library indices of different samples in a run are provided in the meta data. These can be used to demultiplex the raw file into separate libraries. The read files from an inDrops run have the following content: * R1 001.fastq.gz : contains the three prime UTR cDNA read * R2 001.fastq.gz : contains the first half of the cell barcode * R3 001.fastq.gz : contains the library index for demultiplexing libraries * R4 001.fastq.gz : contains the second half of the barcode and the UMI.  All subsequent processing steps from FASTQ files to count matrixes were performed using the custom pipeline for inDrops data analysis github.com/indrops. Single cell transcriptomes were barcoded using inDrops Klein et al  Cell 2015. Standard transcriptome RNA seq libraries were processed as reported in Zilionis et al. Nature Protocol 2016 using inDrops v3 protocol. The transcriptome libraries were sequenced on reads Illumina NextSeq 500. Libraries used standard Illumina sequencing primers and 61 cycles for Read1  14 cycles for Read2  8 cycles each for IndexRead1 and IndexRead2. Raw fastq files was processed using inDrops.py pipeline github.com/indrops/indrops. Sequenced reads were mapped to a zebrafish reference transcriptome built from the zebrafish GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 using bowtie version 1.1.143. To obtain the final counts matrix used for data analysis  total count filters were applied as described in Kukreja et. al. 2024  method section \"Single cell RNA seq Data preprocessing\" Assembly: GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 Supplementary files format and content: Raw counts tsv.gz: cell barcode  gene names  and raw counts for all cells Supplementary files format and content: Metadata metadata.csv: library identity  cell barcode  and associated metadata for all cells   time point  treatment  replicate  annotated cell state  total number of counts  etc Library strategy: inDrops v3 scRNA seq", "whole embryo", "Zebrafish embryos were arrested for cell cycle using two complementary approaches. S phase cell cycle arrest was induced using a cocktail of drugs \u2013 hydroxyurea Sigma Aldrich H8627 5G at 20 mM and aphidicolin Sigma Aldrich A0781 5MG at 150 \u00b5M concentration in 1% dimethyl sulfoxide DMSO in egg water. G2/M phase arrest was induced by crossing heterozygous emi1 wt/mut zebrafish to generate homozygous emi1 mut/mut embryos  referred as hi2648 in the manuscript. Homozygous mutants with cell cycle arrest were screened at 24 hpf as they have very clear phenotype by this time \u2013 these embryos are smaller and have bent tails and the heterozygous mutants and wildtype are indistinguishable.", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", "AB wild type strains were used for all HUA perturbation experiments. Zebrafish mutant line hi2648  a mutant for the gene emi1  was kindly gifted by Dr. Jennifer Rhodes. Embryos were developed within the ambient temperature of Zebrafish development. Time of fertilization at 28.5 C was used to stage each clutch and this was confirmed using morphological features of the embryos. All zebrafish were housed in a facility overseen by the Harvard Medical Area Standing Committee on Animals our IACUC which performs regular inspections and under which we have an approved protocol for all animal procedures.", "tissue:whole embryo|treatment:1percent DMSO control and cell cycle arrest at 6 hpf", "GSM8327217", "GSM8327217: Perturbation experiment 2  24 hpf biological replicate 2  technical replicate 1 to 6; Danio rerio; OTHER", "GSM8327217 r1", "GSM8327217", "1", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", null, "OTHER", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "NextSeq 500", null, "SRP513754", null, null, "pert_exp2_brep2_trep1_to_6_S0_L002_R1_001.fastq.gz pert_exp2_brep2_trep1_to_6_S0_L002_R2_001.fastq.gz pert_exp2_brep2_trep1_to_6_S0_L002_R3_001.fastq.gz pert_exp2_brep2_trep1_to_6_S0_L002_R4_001.fastq.gz", "fastq fastq fastq fastq", 9113682123.0, 100150353.0, "GSM8327217 r2", "0:61 1:8 2:8 3:14", "A:1686097187;C:1259089439;G:1218258982;T:1945625439;N:100486", 61, 8, 8, 14, 1686097187, 1259089439, 1218258982, 1945625439, 100486, "SRX24912668", "SRS21618601", "SRA1898111", "Harvard University", "Harvard University", null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, "B", null, "usable mapping rate", "illumina", "nextseq", "unknown", "other", "trueseq", "sc", "single_cell_droplet", "indrops", null, "United States", "2024-06-13", "Multi-stage", "Embryo", "Whole Organism", "All anatomical structures"], [32739, "SRR29398878", "SRX24912668", "SRS21618601", "SRP513754", "PRJNA1123686", "Cell state transitions are decoupled from cell division during early embryo development [I]", "GSE269784", "Other", "As tissues develop  cells divide and differentiate concurrently. Conflicting evidence shows that cell division is either dispensable or required for formation of cell types. To determine the role of cell division in differentiation  we arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos using two independent approaches and profiled them at single cell resolution. We show that cell division is dispensable for differentiation of all embryonic tissues during initial cell type differentiation from early gastrulation to the end of segmentation. However  in the absence of cell division  differentiation slows down in some cell types  and cells exhibit global stress responses. While differentiation is robust to blocking cell division  the proportions of cells across cell states are not but show evidence of partial compensation. This work clarifies our understanding of the role of cell division in development and showcases the utility of combining embryo wide perturbations with single cell RNA sequencing to uncover the role of common biological processes across multiple tissues. Overall design: We arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos at 6 hpf using two independent approaches: a chemical approach hydroxyurea and aphidicolin  HUA and a genetic approach involving a loss of function mutation in the gene emi1 allele hi2648. We tracked differentiation dynamics using single cell RNA sequencing scRNA seq on embryos spanning 6\u201324 hpf for HUA treated and control embryos  and at 24 hpf for emi1 mutant embryos. Overall we have collected multiple replicates for control embryos ABs at 6  8  10  14  18  21 hpf and 24 hpf  for HUA treated at 8  10  14 hpf and 24 hpf and for emi1 mutants at 24 hpf.  Details about the samples can be found in the supplementary file \"sample information.txt\"", null, "pubmed:37546736", null, "Perturbation experiment 2  24 hpf biological replicate 2  technical replicate 1 to 6", "GSM8327217", null, "source name:whole embryo|tissue:whole embryo|treatment:1percent DMSO control and cell cycle arrest at 6 hpf|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing", "Perturbation experiment 2  24 hpf biological replicate 2  technical replicate 1 to 6", "Multiple samples are pooled for each sequencing run. Raw FASTQ were prepared from Illumina bcl files in a format compatible with the inDrops.py pipeline. Each nextseq run results in 16 FASTQ files 4 lanes x 4 reads per lane. For some pooled libraries  sequencing was run twice to get more UMIs per cell and hence we have deposited 16x2 = 32 raw files for those sequencing samples. The illumina library indices of different samples in a run are provided in the meta data. These can be used to demultiplex the raw file into separate libraries. The read files from an inDrops run have the following content: * R1 001.fastq.gz : contains the three prime UTR cDNA read * R2 001.fastq.gz : contains the first half of the cell barcode * R3 001.fastq.gz : contains the library index for demultiplexing libraries * R4 001.fastq.gz : contains the second half of the barcode and the UMI.  All subsequent processing steps from FASTQ files to count matrixes were performed using the custom pipeline for inDrops data analysis github.com/indrops. Single cell transcriptomes were barcoded using inDrops Klein et al  Cell 2015. Standard transcriptome RNA seq libraries were processed as reported in Zilionis et al. Nature Protocol 2016 using inDrops v3 protocol. The transcriptome libraries were sequenced on reads Illumina NextSeq 500. Libraries used standard Illumina sequencing primers and 61 cycles for Read1  14 cycles for Read2  8 cycles each for IndexRead1 and IndexRead2. Raw fastq files was processed using inDrops.py pipeline github.com/indrops/indrops. Sequenced reads were mapped to a zebrafish reference transcriptome built from the zebrafish GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 using bowtie version 1.1.143. To obtain the final counts matrix used for data analysis  total count filters were applied as described in Kukreja et. al. 2024  method section \"Single cell RNA seq Data preprocessing\" Assembly: GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 Supplementary files format and content: Raw counts tsv.gz: cell barcode  gene names  and raw counts for all cells Supplementary files format and content: Metadata metadata.csv: library identity  cell barcode  and associated metadata for all cells   time point  treatment  replicate  annotated cell state  total number of counts  etc Library strategy: inDrops v3 scRNA seq", "whole embryo", "Zebrafish embryos were arrested for cell cycle using two complementary approaches. S phase cell cycle arrest was induced using a cocktail of drugs \u2013 hydroxyurea Sigma Aldrich H8627 5G at 20 mM and aphidicolin Sigma Aldrich A0781 5MG at 150 \u00b5M concentration in 1% dimethyl sulfoxide DMSO in egg water. G2/M phase arrest was induced by crossing heterozygous emi1 wt/mut zebrafish to generate homozygous emi1 mut/mut embryos  referred as hi2648 in the manuscript. Homozygous mutants with cell cycle arrest were screened at 24 hpf as they have very clear phenotype by this time \u2013 these embryos are smaller and have bent tails and the heterozygous mutants and wildtype are indistinguishable.", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", "AB wild type strains were used for all HUA perturbation experiments. Zebrafish mutant line hi2648  a mutant for the gene emi1  was kindly gifted by Dr. Jennifer Rhodes. Embryos were developed within the ambient temperature of Zebrafish development. Time of fertilization at 28.5 C was used to stage each clutch and this was confirmed using morphological features of the embryos. All zebrafish were housed in a facility overseen by the Harvard Medical Area Standing Committee on Animals our IACUC which performs regular inspections and under which we have an approved protocol for all animal procedures.", "tissue:whole embryo|treatment:1percent DMSO control and cell cycle arrest at 6 hpf", "GSM8327217", "GSM8327217: Perturbation experiment 2  24 hpf biological replicate 2  technical replicate 1 to 6; Danio rerio; OTHER", "GSM8327217 r1", "GSM8327217", "1", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", null, "OTHER", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "NextSeq 500", null, "SRP513754", null, null, "pert_exp2_brep2_trep1_to_6_S0_L003_R1_001.fastq.gz pert_exp2_brep2_trep1_to_6_S0_L003_R2_001.fastq.gz pert_exp2_brep2_trep1_to_6_S0_L003_R3_001.fastq.gz pert_exp2_brep2_trep1_to_6_S0_L003_R4_001.fastq.gz", "fastq fastq fastq fastq", 9286087720.0, 102044920.0, "GSM8327217 r3", "0:61 1:8 2:8 3:14", "A:1716420906;C:1285666517;G:1243365905;T:1979187027;N:99765", 61, 8, 8, 14, 1716420906, 1285666517, 1243365905, 1979187027, 99765, "SRX24912668", "SRS21618601", "SRA1898111", "Harvard University", "Harvard University", null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, "B", null, "usable mapping rate", "illumina", "nextseq", "unknown", "other", "trueseq", "sc", "single_cell_droplet", "indrops", null, "United States", "2024-06-13", "Multi-stage", "Embryo", "Whole Organism", "All anatomical structures"], [32740, "SRR29398879", "SRX24912668", "SRS21618601", "SRP513754", "PRJNA1123686", "Cell state transitions are decoupled from cell division during early embryo development [I]", "GSE269784", "Other", "As tissues develop  cells divide and differentiate concurrently. Conflicting evidence shows that cell division is either dispensable or required for formation of cell types. To determine the role of cell division in differentiation  we arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos using two independent approaches and profiled them at single cell resolution. We show that cell division is dispensable for differentiation of all embryonic tissues during initial cell type differentiation from early gastrulation to the end of segmentation. However  in the absence of cell division  differentiation slows down in some cell types  and cells exhibit global stress responses. While differentiation is robust to blocking cell division  the proportions of cells across cell states are not but show evidence of partial compensation. This work clarifies our understanding of the role of cell division in development and showcases the utility of combining embryo wide perturbations with single cell RNA sequencing to uncover the role of common biological processes across multiple tissues. Overall design: We arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos at 6 hpf using two independent approaches: a chemical approach hydroxyurea and aphidicolin  HUA and a genetic approach involving a loss of function mutation in the gene emi1 allele hi2648. We tracked differentiation dynamics using single cell RNA sequencing scRNA seq on embryos spanning 6\u201324 hpf for HUA treated and control embryos  and at 24 hpf for emi1 mutant embryos. Overall we have collected multiple replicates for control embryos ABs at 6  8  10  14  18  21 hpf and 24 hpf  for HUA treated at 8  10  14 hpf and 24 hpf and for emi1 mutants at 24 hpf.  Details about the samples can be found in the supplementary file \"sample information.txt\"", null, "pubmed:37546736", null, "Perturbation experiment 2  24 hpf biological replicate 2  technical replicate 1 to 6", "GSM8327217", null, "source name:whole embryo|tissue:whole embryo|treatment:1percent DMSO control and cell cycle arrest at 6 hpf|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing", "Perturbation experiment 2  24 hpf biological replicate 2  technical replicate 1 to 6", "Multiple samples are pooled for each sequencing run. Raw FASTQ were prepared from Illumina bcl files in a format compatible with the inDrops.py pipeline. Each nextseq run results in 16 FASTQ files 4 lanes x 4 reads per lane. For some pooled libraries  sequencing was run twice to get more UMIs per cell and hence we have deposited 16x2 = 32 raw files for those sequencing samples. The illumina library indices of different samples in a run are provided in the meta data. These can be used to demultiplex the raw file into separate libraries. The read files from an inDrops run have the following content: * R1 001.fastq.gz : contains the three prime UTR cDNA read * R2 001.fastq.gz : contains the first half of the cell barcode * R3 001.fastq.gz : contains the library index for demultiplexing libraries * R4 001.fastq.gz : contains the second half of the barcode and the UMI.  All subsequent processing steps from FASTQ files to count matrixes were performed using the custom pipeline for inDrops data analysis github.com/indrops. Single cell transcriptomes were barcoded using inDrops Klein et al  Cell 2015. Standard transcriptome RNA seq libraries were processed as reported in Zilionis et al. Nature Protocol 2016 using inDrops v3 protocol. The transcriptome libraries were sequenced on reads Illumina NextSeq 500. Libraries used standard Illumina sequencing primers and 61 cycles for Read1  14 cycles for Read2  8 cycles each for IndexRead1 and IndexRead2. Raw fastq files was processed using inDrops.py pipeline github.com/indrops/indrops. Sequenced reads were mapped to a zebrafish reference transcriptome built from the zebrafish GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 using bowtie version 1.1.143. To obtain the final counts matrix used for data analysis  total count filters were applied as described in Kukreja et. al. 2024  method section \"Single cell RNA seq Data preprocessing\" Assembly: GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 Supplementary files format and content: Raw counts tsv.gz: cell barcode  gene names  and raw counts for all cells Supplementary files format and content: Metadata metadata.csv: library identity  cell barcode  and associated metadata for all cells   time point  treatment  replicate  annotated cell state  total number of counts  etc Library strategy: inDrops v3 scRNA seq", "whole embryo", "Zebrafish embryos were arrested for cell cycle using two complementary approaches. S phase cell cycle arrest was induced using a cocktail of drugs \u2013 hydroxyurea Sigma Aldrich H8627 5G at 20 mM and aphidicolin Sigma Aldrich A0781 5MG at 150 \u00b5M concentration in 1% dimethyl sulfoxide DMSO in egg water. G2/M phase arrest was induced by crossing heterozygous emi1 wt/mut zebrafish to generate homozygous emi1 mut/mut embryos  referred as hi2648 in the manuscript. Homozygous mutants with cell cycle arrest were screened at 24 hpf as they have very clear phenotype by this time \u2013 these embryos are smaller and have bent tails and the heterozygous mutants and wildtype are indistinguishable.", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", "AB wild type strains were used for all HUA perturbation experiments. Zebrafish mutant line hi2648  a mutant for the gene emi1  was kindly gifted by Dr. Jennifer Rhodes. Embryos were developed within the ambient temperature of Zebrafish development. Time of fertilization at 28.5 C was used to stage each clutch and this was confirmed using morphological features of the embryos. All zebrafish were housed in a facility overseen by the Harvard Medical Area Standing Committee on Animals our IACUC which performs regular inspections and under which we have an approved protocol for all animal procedures.", "tissue:whole embryo|treatment:1percent DMSO control and cell cycle arrest at 6 hpf", "GSM8327217", "GSM8327217: Perturbation experiment 2  24 hpf biological replicate 2  technical replicate 1 to 6; Danio rerio; OTHER", "GSM8327217 r1", "GSM8327217", "1", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", null, "OTHER", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "NextSeq 500", null, "SRP513754", null, null, "pert_exp2_brep2_trep1_to_6_S0_L004_R1_001.fastq.gz pert_exp2_brep2_trep1_to_6_S0_L004_R2_001.fastq.gz pert_exp2_brep2_trep1_to_6_S0_L004_R3_001.fastq.gz pert_exp2_brep2_trep1_to_6_S0_L004_R4_001.fastq.gz", "fastq fastq fastq fastq", 9274368740.0, 101916140.0, "GSM8327217 r4", "0:61 1:8 2:8 3:14", "A:1714501829;C:1283534271;G:1240916416;T:1977833740;N:98284", 61, 8, 8, 14, 1714501829, 1283534271, 1240916416, 1977833740, 98284, "SRX24912668", "SRS21618601", "SRA1898111", "Harvard University", "Harvard University", null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, "B", null, "usable mapping rate", "illumina", "nextseq", "unknown", "other", "trueseq", "sc", "single_cell_droplet", "indrops", null, "United States", "2024-06-13", "Multi-stage", "Embryo", "Whole Organism", "All anatomical structures"], [32741, "SRR29398880", "SRX24912667", "SRS21618602", "SRP513754", "PRJNA1123686", "Cell state transitions are decoupled from cell division during early embryo development [I]", "GSE269784", "Other", "As tissues develop  cells divide and differentiate concurrently. Conflicting evidence shows that cell division is either dispensable or required for formation of cell types. To determine the role of cell division in differentiation  we arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos using two independent approaches and profiled them at single cell resolution. We show that cell division is dispensable for differentiation of all embryonic tissues during initial cell type differentiation from early gastrulation to the end of segmentation. However  in the absence of cell division  differentiation slows down in some cell types  and cells exhibit global stress responses. While differentiation is robust to blocking cell division  the proportions of cells across cell states are not but show evidence of partial compensation. This work clarifies our understanding of the role of cell division in development and showcases the utility of combining embryo wide perturbations with single cell RNA sequencing to uncover the role of common biological processes across multiple tissues. Overall design: We arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos at 6 hpf using two independent approaches: a chemical approach hydroxyurea and aphidicolin  HUA and a genetic approach involving a loss of function mutation in the gene emi1 allele hi2648. We tracked differentiation dynamics using single cell RNA sequencing scRNA seq on embryos spanning 6\u201324 hpf for HUA treated and control embryos  and at 24 hpf for emi1 mutant embryos. Overall we have collected multiple replicates for control embryos ABs at 6  8  10  14  18  21 hpf and 24 hpf  for HUA treated at 8  10  14 hpf and 24 hpf and for emi1 mutants at 24 hpf.  Details about the samples can be found in the supplementary file \"sample information.txt\"", null, "pubmed:37546736", null, "Perturbation experiment 2  24 hpf biological replicate 1  technical replicate 1 to 4", "GSM8327216", null, "source name:whole embryo|tissue:whole embryo|treatment:1percent DMSO control and cell cycle arrest at 6 hpf|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing", "Perturbation experiment 2  24 hpf biological replicate 1  technical replicate 1 to 4", "Multiple samples are pooled for each sequencing run. Raw FASTQ were prepared from Illumina bcl files in a format compatible with the inDrops.py pipeline. Each nextseq run results in 16 FASTQ files 4 lanes x 4 reads per lane. For some pooled libraries  sequencing was run twice to get more UMIs per cell and hence we have deposited 16x2 = 32 raw files for those sequencing samples. The illumina library indices of different samples in a run are provided in the meta data. These can be used to demultiplex the raw file into separate libraries. The read files from an inDrops run have the following content: * R1 001.fastq.gz : contains the three prime UTR cDNA read * R2 001.fastq.gz : contains the first half of the cell barcode * R3 001.fastq.gz : contains the library index for demultiplexing libraries * R4 001.fastq.gz : contains the second half of the barcode and the UMI.  All subsequent processing steps from FASTQ files to count matrixes were performed using the custom pipeline for inDrops data analysis github.com/indrops. Single cell transcriptomes were barcoded using inDrops Klein et al  Cell 2015. Standard transcriptome RNA seq libraries were processed as reported in Zilionis et al. Nature Protocol 2016 using inDrops v3 protocol. The transcriptome libraries were sequenced on reads Illumina NextSeq 500. Libraries used standard Illumina sequencing primers and 61 cycles for Read1  14 cycles for Read2  8 cycles each for IndexRead1 and IndexRead2. Raw fastq files was processed using inDrops.py pipeline github.com/indrops/indrops. Sequenced reads were mapped to a zebrafish reference transcriptome built from the zebrafish GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 using bowtie version 1.1.143. To obtain the final counts matrix used for data analysis  total count filters were applied as described in Kukreja et. al. 2024  method section \"Single cell RNA seq Data preprocessing\" Assembly: GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 Supplementary files format and content: Raw counts tsv.gz: cell barcode  gene names  and raw counts for all cells Supplementary files format and content: Metadata metadata.csv: library identity  cell barcode  and associated metadata for all cells   time point  treatment  replicate  annotated cell state  total number of counts  etc Library strategy: inDrops v3 scRNA seq", "whole embryo", "Zebrafish embryos were arrested for cell cycle using two complementary approaches. S phase cell cycle arrest was induced using a cocktail of drugs \u2013 hydroxyurea Sigma Aldrich H8627 5G at 20 mM and aphidicolin Sigma Aldrich A0781 5MG at 150 \u00b5M concentration in 1% dimethyl sulfoxide DMSO in egg water. G2/M phase arrest was induced by crossing heterozygous emi1 wt/mut zebrafish to generate homozygous emi1 mut/mut embryos  referred as hi2648 in the manuscript. Homozygous mutants with cell cycle arrest were screened at 24 hpf as they have very clear phenotype by this time \u2013 these embryos are smaller and have bent tails and the heterozygous mutants and wildtype are indistinguishable.", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", "AB wild type strains were used for all HUA perturbation experiments. Zebrafish mutant line hi2648  a mutant for the gene emi1  was kindly gifted by Dr. Jennifer Rhodes. Embryos were developed within the ambient temperature of Zebrafish development. Time of fertilization at 28.5 C was used to stage each clutch and this was confirmed using morphological features of the embryos. All zebrafish were housed in a facility overseen by the Harvard Medical Area Standing Committee on Animals our IACUC which performs regular inspections and under which we have an approved protocol for all animal procedures.", "tissue:whole embryo|treatment:1percent DMSO control and cell cycle arrest at 6 hpf", "GSM8327216", "GSM8327216: Perturbation experiment 2  24 hpf biological replicate 1  technical replicate 1 to 4; Danio rerio; OTHER", "GSM8327216 r1", "GSM8327216", "1", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", null, "OTHER", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "NextSeq 500", null, "SRP513754", null, null, "pert_exp2_brep1_trep1_2_3_4_S0_L001_R1_001.fastq.gz pert_exp2_brep1_trep1_2_3_4_S0_L001_R2_001.fastq.gz pert_exp2_brep1_trep1_2_3_4_S0_L001_R3_001.fastq.gz pert_exp2_brep1_trep1_2_3_4_S0_L001_R4_001.fastq.gz", "fastq fastq fastq fastq", 10478915720.0, 115152920.0, "GSM8327216 r1", "0:61 1:8 2:8 3:14", "A:1736895270;C:1397254088;G:1357881943;T:2531770836;N:525983", 61, 8, 8, 14, 1736895270, 1397254088, 1357881943, 2531770836, 525983, "SRX24912667", "SRS21618602", "SRA1898111", "Harvard University", "Harvard University", null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, "B", null, "usable mapping rate", "illumina", "nextseq", "unknown", "other", "trueseq", "sc", "single_cell_droplet", "indrops", null, "United States", "2024-06-13", "Multi-stage", "Embryo", "Whole Organism", "All anatomical structures"], [32742, "SRR29398881", "SRX24912667", "SRS21618602", "SRP513754", "PRJNA1123686", "Cell state transitions are decoupled from cell division during early embryo development [I]", "GSE269784", "Other", "As tissues develop  cells divide and differentiate concurrently. Conflicting evidence shows that cell division is either dispensable or required for formation of cell types. To determine the role of cell division in differentiation  we arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos using two independent approaches and profiled them at single cell resolution. We show that cell division is dispensable for differentiation of all embryonic tissues during initial cell type differentiation from early gastrulation to the end of segmentation. However  in the absence of cell division  differentiation slows down in some cell types  and cells exhibit global stress responses. While differentiation is robust to blocking cell division  the proportions of cells across cell states are not but show evidence of partial compensation. This work clarifies our understanding of the role of cell division in development and showcases the utility of combining embryo wide perturbations with single cell RNA sequencing to uncover the role of common biological processes across multiple tissues. Overall design: We arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos at 6 hpf using two independent approaches: a chemical approach hydroxyurea and aphidicolin  HUA and a genetic approach involving a loss of function mutation in the gene emi1 allele hi2648. We tracked differentiation dynamics using single cell RNA sequencing scRNA seq on embryos spanning 6\u201324 hpf for HUA treated and control embryos  and at 24 hpf for emi1 mutant embryos. Overall we have collected multiple replicates for control embryos ABs at 6  8  10  14  18  21 hpf and 24 hpf  for HUA treated at 8  10  14 hpf and 24 hpf and for emi1 mutants at 24 hpf.  Details about the samples can be found in the supplementary file \"sample information.txt\"", null, "pubmed:37546736", null, "Perturbation experiment 2  24 hpf biological replicate 1  technical replicate 1 to 4", "GSM8327216", null, "source name:whole embryo|tissue:whole embryo|treatment:1percent DMSO control and cell cycle arrest at 6 hpf|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing", "Perturbation experiment 2  24 hpf biological replicate 1  technical replicate 1 to 4", "Multiple samples are pooled for each sequencing run. Raw FASTQ were prepared from Illumina bcl files in a format compatible with the inDrops.py pipeline. Each nextseq run results in 16 FASTQ files 4 lanes x 4 reads per lane. For some pooled libraries  sequencing was run twice to get more UMIs per cell and hence we have deposited 16x2 = 32 raw files for those sequencing samples. The illumina library indices of different samples in a run are provided in the meta data. These can be used to demultiplex the raw file into separate libraries. The read files from an inDrops run have the following content: * R1 001.fastq.gz : contains the three prime UTR cDNA read * R2 001.fastq.gz : contains the first half of the cell barcode * R3 001.fastq.gz : contains the library index for demultiplexing libraries * R4 001.fastq.gz : contains the second half of the barcode and the UMI.  All subsequent processing steps from FASTQ files to count matrixes were performed using the custom pipeline for inDrops data analysis github.com/indrops. Single cell transcriptomes were barcoded using inDrops Klein et al  Cell 2015. Standard transcriptome RNA seq libraries were processed as reported in Zilionis et al. Nature Protocol 2016 using inDrops v3 protocol. The transcriptome libraries were sequenced on reads Illumina NextSeq 500. Libraries used standard Illumina sequencing primers and 61 cycles for Read1  14 cycles for Read2  8 cycles each for IndexRead1 and IndexRead2. Raw fastq files was processed using inDrops.py pipeline github.com/indrops/indrops. Sequenced reads were mapped to a zebrafish reference transcriptome built from the zebrafish GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 using bowtie version 1.1.143. To obtain the final counts matrix used for data analysis  total count filters were applied as described in Kukreja et. al. 2024  method section \"Single cell RNA seq Data preprocessing\" Assembly: GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 Supplementary files format and content: Raw counts tsv.gz: cell barcode  gene names  and raw counts for all cells Supplementary files format and content: Metadata metadata.csv: library identity  cell barcode  and associated metadata for all cells   time point  treatment  replicate  annotated cell state  total number of counts  etc Library strategy: inDrops v3 scRNA seq", "whole embryo", "Zebrafish embryos were arrested for cell cycle using two complementary approaches. S phase cell cycle arrest was induced using a cocktail of drugs \u2013 hydroxyurea Sigma Aldrich H8627 5G at 20 mM and aphidicolin Sigma Aldrich A0781 5MG at 150 \u00b5M concentration in 1% dimethyl sulfoxide DMSO in egg water. G2/M phase arrest was induced by crossing heterozygous emi1 wt/mut zebrafish to generate homozygous emi1 mut/mut embryos  referred as hi2648 in the manuscript. Homozygous mutants with cell cycle arrest were screened at 24 hpf as they have very clear phenotype by this time \u2013 these embryos are smaller and have bent tails and the heterozygous mutants and wildtype are indistinguishable.", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", "AB wild type strains were used for all HUA perturbation experiments. Zebrafish mutant line hi2648  a mutant for the gene emi1  was kindly gifted by Dr. Jennifer Rhodes. Embryos were developed within the ambient temperature of Zebrafish development. Time of fertilization at 28.5 C was used to stage each clutch and this was confirmed using morphological features of the embryos. All zebrafish were housed in a facility overseen by the Harvard Medical Area Standing Committee on Animals our IACUC which performs regular inspections and under which we have an approved protocol for all animal procedures.", "tissue:whole embryo|treatment:1percent DMSO control and cell cycle arrest at 6 hpf", "GSM8327216", "GSM8327216: Perturbation experiment 2  24 hpf biological replicate 1  technical replicate 1 to 4; Danio rerio; OTHER", "GSM8327216 r1", "GSM8327216", "1", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", null, "OTHER", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "NextSeq 500", null, "SRP513754", null, null, "pert_exp2_brep1_trep1_2_3_4_S0_L002_R1_001.fastq.gz pert_exp2_brep1_trep1_2_3_4_S0_L002_R2_001.fastq.gz pert_exp2_brep1_trep1_2_3_4_S0_L002_R3_001.fastq.gz pert_exp2_brep1_trep1_2_3_4_S0_L002_R4_001.fastq.gz", "fastq fastq fastq fastq", 10976773171.0, 120623881.0, "GSM8327216 r2", "0:61 1:8 2:8 3:14", "A:1854295106;C:1459958363;G:1422957853;T:2620345368;N:500051", 61, 8, 8, 14, 1854295106, 1459958363, 1422957853, 2620345368, 500051, "SRX24912667", "SRS21618602", "SRA1898111", "Harvard University", "Harvard University", null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, "B", null, "usable mapping rate", "illumina", "nextseq", "unknown", "other", "trueseq", "sc", "single_cell_droplet", "indrops", null, "United States", "2024-06-13", "Multi-stage", "Embryo", "Whole Organism", "All anatomical structures"], [32743, "SRR29398882", "SRX24912667", "SRS21618602", "SRP513754", "PRJNA1123686", "Cell state transitions are decoupled from cell division during early embryo development [I]", "GSE269784", "Other", "As tissues develop  cells divide and differentiate concurrently. Conflicting evidence shows that cell division is either dispensable or required for formation of cell types. To determine the role of cell division in differentiation  we arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos using two independent approaches and profiled them at single cell resolution. We show that cell division is dispensable for differentiation of all embryonic tissues during initial cell type differentiation from early gastrulation to the end of segmentation. However  in the absence of cell division  differentiation slows down in some cell types  and cells exhibit global stress responses. While differentiation is robust to blocking cell division  the proportions of cells across cell states are not but show evidence of partial compensation. This work clarifies our understanding of the role of cell division in development and showcases the utility of combining embryo wide perturbations with single cell RNA sequencing to uncover the role of common biological processes across multiple tissues. Overall design: We arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos at 6 hpf using two independent approaches: a chemical approach hydroxyurea and aphidicolin  HUA and a genetic approach involving a loss of function mutation in the gene emi1 allele hi2648. We tracked differentiation dynamics using single cell RNA sequencing scRNA seq on embryos spanning 6\u201324 hpf for HUA treated and control embryos  and at 24 hpf for emi1 mutant embryos. Overall we have collected multiple replicates for control embryos ABs at 6  8  10  14  18  21 hpf and 24 hpf  for HUA treated at 8  10  14 hpf and 24 hpf and for emi1 mutants at 24 hpf.  Details about the samples can be found in the supplementary file \"sample information.txt\"", null, "pubmed:37546736", null, "Perturbation experiment 2  24 hpf biological replicate 1  technical replicate 1 to 4", "GSM8327216", null, "source name:whole embryo|tissue:whole embryo|treatment:1percent DMSO control and cell cycle arrest at 6 hpf|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing", "Perturbation experiment 2  24 hpf biological replicate 1  technical replicate 1 to 4", "Multiple samples are pooled for each sequencing run. Raw FASTQ were prepared from Illumina bcl files in a format compatible with the inDrops.py pipeline. Each nextseq run results in 16 FASTQ files 4 lanes x 4 reads per lane. For some pooled libraries  sequencing was run twice to get more UMIs per cell and hence we have deposited 16x2 = 32 raw files for those sequencing samples. The illumina library indices of different samples in a run are provided in the meta data. These can be used to demultiplex the raw file into separate libraries. The read files from an inDrops run have the following content: * R1 001.fastq.gz : contains the three prime UTR cDNA read * R2 001.fastq.gz : contains the first half of the cell barcode * R3 001.fastq.gz : contains the library index for demultiplexing libraries * R4 001.fastq.gz : contains the second half of the barcode and the UMI.  All subsequent processing steps from FASTQ files to count matrixes were performed using the custom pipeline for inDrops data analysis github.com/indrops. Single cell transcriptomes were barcoded using inDrops Klein et al  Cell 2015. Standard transcriptome RNA seq libraries were processed as reported in Zilionis et al. Nature Protocol 2016 using inDrops v3 protocol. The transcriptome libraries were sequenced on reads Illumina NextSeq 500. Libraries used standard Illumina sequencing primers and 61 cycles for Read1  14 cycles for Read2  8 cycles each for IndexRead1 and IndexRead2. Raw fastq files was processed using inDrops.py pipeline github.com/indrops/indrops. Sequenced reads were mapped to a zebrafish reference transcriptome built from the zebrafish GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 using bowtie version 1.1.143. To obtain the final counts matrix used for data analysis  total count filters were applied as described in Kukreja et. al. 2024  method section \"Single cell RNA seq Data preprocessing\" Assembly: GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 Supplementary files format and content: Raw counts tsv.gz: cell barcode  gene names  and raw counts for all cells Supplementary files format and content: Metadata metadata.csv: library identity  cell barcode  and associated metadata for all cells   time point  treatment  replicate  annotated cell state  total number of counts  etc Library strategy: inDrops v3 scRNA seq", "whole embryo", "Zebrafish embryos were arrested for cell cycle using two complementary approaches. S phase cell cycle arrest was induced using a cocktail of drugs \u2013 hydroxyurea Sigma Aldrich H8627 5G at 20 mM and aphidicolin Sigma Aldrich A0781 5MG at 150 \u00b5M concentration in 1% dimethyl sulfoxide DMSO in egg water. G2/M phase arrest was induced by crossing heterozygous emi1 wt/mut zebrafish to generate homozygous emi1 mut/mut embryos  referred as hi2648 in the manuscript. Homozygous mutants with cell cycle arrest were screened at 24 hpf as they have very clear phenotype by this time \u2013 these embryos are smaller and have bent tails and the heterozygous mutants and wildtype are indistinguishable.", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", "AB wild type strains were used for all HUA perturbation experiments. Zebrafish mutant line hi2648  a mutant for the gene emi1  was kindly gifted by Dr. Jennifer Rhodes. Embryos were developed within the ambient temperature of Zebrafish development. Time of fertilization at 28.5 C was used to stage each clutch and this was confirmed using morphological features of the embryos. All zebrafish were housed in a facility overseen by the Harvard Medical Area Standing Committee on Animals our IACUC which performs regular inspections and under which we have an approved protocol for all animal procedures.", "tissue:whole embryo|treatment:1percent DMSO control and cell cycle arrest at 6 hpf", "GSM8327216", "GSM8327216: Perturbation experiment 2  24 hpf biological replicate 1  technical replicate 1 to 4; Danio rerio; OTHER", "GSM8327216 r1", "GSM8327216", "1", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", null, "OTHER", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "NextSeq 500", null, "SRP513754", null, null, "pert_exp2_brep1_trep1_2_3_4_S0_L003_R1_001.fastq.gz pert_exp2_brep1_trep1_2_3_4_S0_L003_R2_001.fastq.gz pert_exp2_brep1_trep1_2_3_4_S0_L003_R3_001.fastq.gz pert_exp2_brep1_trep1_2_3_4_S0_L003_R4_001.fastq.gz", "fastq fastq fastq fastq", 10970493898.0, 120554878.0, "GSM8327216 r3", "0:61 1:8 2:8 3:14", "A:1804346523;C:1462166175;G:1421809080;T:2665109964;N:415816", 61, 8, 8, 14, 1804346523, 1462166175, 1421809080, 2665109964, 415816, "SRX24912667", "SRS21618602", "SRA1898111", "Harvard University", "Harvard University", null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, "B", null, "usable mapping rate", "illumina", "nextseq", "unknown", "other", "trueseq", "sc", "single_cell_droplet", "indrops", null, "United States", "2024-06-13", "Multi-stage", "Embryo", "Whole Organism", "All anatomical structures"], [32744, "SRR29398883", "SRX24912667", "SRS21618602", "SRP513754", "PRJNA1123686", "Cell state transitions are decoupled from cell division during early embryo development [I]", "GSE269784", "Other", "As tissues develop  cells divide and differentiate concurrently. Conflicting evidence shows that cell division is either dispensable or required for formation of cell types. To determine the role of cell division in differentiation  we arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos using two independent approaches and profiled them at single cell resolution. We show that cell division is dispensable for differentiation of all embryonic tissues during initial cell type differentiation from early gastrulation to the end of segmentation. However  in the absence of cell division  differentiation slows down in some cell types  and cells exhibit global stress responses. While differentiation is robust to blocking cell division  the proportions of cells across cell states are not but show evidence of partial compensation. This work clarifies our understanding of the role of cell division in development and showcases the utility of combining embryo wide perturbations with single cell RNA sequencing to uncover the role of common biological processes across multiple tissues. Overall design: We arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos at 6 hpf using two independent approaches: a chemical approach hydroxyurea and aphidicolin  HUA and a genetic approach involving a loss of function mutation in the gene emi1 allele hi2648. We tracked differentiation dynamics using single cell RNA sequencing scRNA seq on embryos spanning 6\u201324 hpf for HUA treated and control embryos  and at 24 hpf for emi1 mutant embryos. Overall we have collected multiple replicates for control embryos ABs at 6  8  10  14  18  21 hpf and 24 hpf  for HUA treated at 8  10  14 hpf and 24 hpf and for emi1 mutants at 24 hpf.  Details about the samples can be found in the supplementary file \"sample information.txt\"", null, "pubmed:37546736", null, "Perturbation experiment 2  24 hpf biological replicate 1  technical replicate 1 to 4", "GSM8327216", null, "source name:whole embryo|tissue:whole embryo|treatment:1percent DMSO control and cell cycle arrest at 6 hpf|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing", "Perturbation experiment 2  24 hpf biological replicate 1  technical replicate 1 to 4", "Multiple samples are pooled for each sequencing run. Raw FASTQ were prepared from Illumina bcl files in a format compatible with the inDrops.py pipeline. Each nextseq run results in 16 FASTQ files 4 lanes x 4 reads per lane. For some pooled libraries  sequencing was run twice to get more UMIs per cell and hence we have deposited 16x2 = 32 raw files for those sequencing samples. The illumina library indices of different samples in a run are provided in the meta data. These can be used to demultiplex the raw file into separate libraries. The read files from an inDrops run have the following content: * R1 001.fastq.gz : contains the three prime UTR cDNA read * R2 001.fastq.gz : contains the first half of the cell barcode * R3 001.fastq.gz : contains the library index for demultiplexing libraries * R4 001.fastq.gz : contains the second half of the barcode and the UMI.  All subsequent processing steps from FASTQ files to count matrixes were performed using the custom pipeline for inDrops data analysis github.com/indrops. Single cell transcriptomes were barcoded using inDrops Klein et al  Cell 2015. Standard transcriptome RNA seq libraries were processed as reported in Zilionis et al. Nature Protocol 2016 using inDrops v3 protocol. The transcriptome libraries were sequenced on reads Illumina NextSeq 500. Libraries used standard Illumina sequencing primers and 61 cycles for Read1  14 cycles for Read2  8 cycles each for IndexRead1 and IndexRead2. Raw fastq files was processed using inDrops.py pipeline github.com/indrops/indrops. Sequenced reads were mapped to a zebrafish reference transcriptome built from the zebrafish GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 using bowtie version 1.1.143. To obtain the final counts matrix used for data analysis  total count filters were applied as described in Kukreja et. al. 2024  method section \"Single cell RNA seq Data preprocessing\" Assembly: GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 Supplementary files format and content: Raw counts tsv.gz: cell barcode  gene names  and raw counts for all cells Supplementary files format and content: Metadata metadata.csv: library identity  cell barcode  and associated metadata for all cells   time point  treatment  replicate  annotated cell state  total number of counts  etc Library strategy: inDrops v3 scRNA seq", "whole embryo", "Zebrafish embryos were arrested for cell cycle using two complementary approaches. S phase cell cycle arrest was induced using a cocktail of drugs \u2013 hydroxyurea Sigma Aldrich H8627 5G at 20 mM and aphidicolin Sigma Aldrich A0781 5MG at 150 \u00b5M concentration in 1% dimethyl sulfoxide DMSO in egg water. G2/M phase arrest was induced by crossing heterozygous emi1 wt/mut zebrafish to generate homozygous emi1 mut/mut embryos  referred as hi2648 in the manuscript. Homozygous mutants with cell cycle arrest were screened at 24 hpf as they have very clear phenotype by this time \u2013 these embryos are smaller and have bent tails and the heterozygous mutants and wildtype are indistinguishable.", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", "AB wild type strains were used for all HUA perturbation experiments. Zebrafish mutant line hi2648  a mutant for the gene emi1  was kindly gifted by Dr. Jennifer Rhodes. Embryos were developed within the ambient temperature of Zebrafish development. Time of fertilization at 28.5 C was used to stage each clutch and this was confirmed using morphological features of the embryos. All zebrafish were housed in a facility overseen by the Harvard Medical Area Standing Committee on Animals our IACUC which performs regular inspections and under which we have an approved protocol for all animal procedures.", "tissue:whole embryo|treatment:1percent DMSO control and cell cycle arrest at 6 hpf", "GSM8327216", "GSM8327216: Perturbation experiment 2  24 hpf biological replicate 1  technical replicate 1 to 4; Danio rerio; OTHER", "GSM8327216 r1", "GSM8327216", "1", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", null, "OTHER", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "NextSeq 500", null, "SRP513754", null, null, "pert_exp2_brep1_trep1_2_3_4_S0_L004_R1_001.fastq.gz pert_exp2_brep1_trep1_2_3_4_S0_L004_R2_001.fastq.gz pert_exp2_brep1_trep1_2_3_4_S0_L004_R3_001.fastq.gz pert_exp2_brep1_trep1_2_3_4_S0_L004_R4_001.fastq.gz", "fastq fastq fastq fastq", 11081541198.0, 121775178.0, "GSM8327216 r4", "0:61 1:8 2:8 3:14", "A:1869228214;C:1474483692;G:1435361382;T:2648837266;N:375304", 61, 8, 8, 14, 1869228214, 1474483692, 1435361382, 2648837266, 375304, "SRX24912667", "SRS21618602", "SRA1898111", "Harvard University", "Harvard University", null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, "B", null, "usable mapping rate", "illumina", "nextseq", "unknown", "other", "trueseq", "sc", "single_cell_droplet", "indrops", null, "United States", "2024-06-13", "Multi-stage", "Embryo", "Whole Organism", "All anatomical structures"], [32745, "SRR29398884", "SRX24912666", "SRS21618600", "SRP513754", "PRJNA1123686", "Cell state transitions are decoupled from cell division during early embryo development [I]", "GSE269784", "Other", "As tissues develop  cells divide and differentiate concurrently. Conflicting evidence shows that cell division is either dispensable or required for formation of cell types. To determine the role of cell division in differentiation  we arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos using two independent approaches and profiled them at single cell resolution. We show that cell division is dispensable for differentiation of all embryonic tissues during initial cell type differentiation from early gastrulation to the end of segmentation. However  in the absence of cell division  differentiation slows down in some cell types  and cells exhibit global stress responses. While differentiation is robust to blocking cell division  the proportions of cells across cell states are not but show evidence of partial compensation. This work clarifies our understanding of the role of cell division in development and showcases the utility of combining embryo wide perturbations with single cell RNA sequencing to uncover the role of common biological processes across multiple tissues. Overall design: We arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos at 6 hpf using two independent approaches: a chemical approach hydroxyurea and aphidicolin  HUA and a genetic approach involving a loss of function mutation in the gene emi1 allele hi2648. We tracked differentiation dynamics using single cell RNA sequencing scRNA seq on embryos spanning 6\u201324 hpf for HUA treated and control embryos  and at 24 hpf for emi1 mutant embryos. Overall we have collected multiple replicates for control embryos ABs at 6  8  10  14  18  21 hpf and 24 hpf  for HUA treated at 8  10  14 hpf and 24 hpf and for emi1 mutants at 24 hpf.  Details about the samples can be found in the supplementary file \"sample information.txt\"", null, "pubmed:37546736", null, "Perturbation experiment 1  6 hpf 24 hpf biological replicate 3  technical replicate 1", "GSM8327215", null, "source name:whole embryo|tissue:whole embryo|treatment:1percent DMSO control and cell cycle arrest at 6 hpf|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing", "Perturbation experiment 1  6 hpf 24 hpf biological replicate 3  technical replicate 1", "Multiple samples are pooled for each sequencing run. Raw FASTQ were prepared from Illumina bcl files in a format compatible with the inDrops.py pipeline. Each nextseq run results in 16 FASTQ files 4 lanes x 4 reads per lane. For some pooled libraries  sequencing was run twice to get more UMIs per cell and hence we have deposited 16x2 = 32 raw files for those sequencing samples. The illumina library indices of different samples in a run are provided in the meta data. These can be used to demultiplex the raw file into separate libraries. The read files from an inDrops run have the following content: * R1 001.fastq.gz : contains the three prime UTR cDNA read * R2 001.fastq.gz : contains the first half of the cell barcode * R3 001.fastq.gz : contains the library index for demultiplexing libraries * R4 001.fastq.gz : contains the second half of the barcode and the UMI.  All subsequent processing steps from FASTQ files to count matrixes were performed using the custom pipeline for inDrops data analysis github.com/indrops. Single cell transcriptomes were barcoded using inDrops Klein et al  Cell 2015. Standard transcriptome RNA seq libraries were processed as reported in Zilionis et al. Nature Protocol 2016 using inDrops v3 protocol. The transcriptome libraries were sequenced on reads Illumina NextSeq 500. Libraries used standard Illumina sequencing primers and 61 cycles for Read1  14 cycles for Read2  8 cycles each for IndexRead1 and IndexRead2. Raw fastq files was processed using inDrops.py pipeline github.com/indrops/indrops. Sequenced reads were mapped to a zebrafish reference transcriptome built from the zebrafish GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 using bowtie version 1.1.143. To obtain the final counts matrix used for data analysis  total count filters were applied as described in Kukreja et. al. 2024  method section \"Single cell RNA seq Data preprocessing\" Assembly: GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 Supplementary files format and content: Raw counts tsv.gz: cell barcode  gene names  and raw counts for all cells Supplementary files format and content: Metadata metadata.csv: library identity  cell barcode  and associated metadata for all cells   time point  treatment  replicate  annotated cell state  total number of counts  etc Library strategy: inDrops v3 scRNA seq", "whole embryo", "Zebrafish embryos were arrested for cell cycle using two complementary approaches. S phase cell cycle arrest was induced using a cocktail of drugs \u2013 hydroxyurea Sigma Aldrich H8627 5G at 20 mM and aphidicolin Sigma Aldrich A0781 5MG at 150 \u00b5M concentration in 1% dimethyl sulfoxide DMSO in egg water. G2/M phase arrest was induced by crossing heterozygous emi1 wt/mut zebrafish to generate homozygous emi1 mut/mut embryos  referred as hi2648 in the manuscript. Homozygous mutants with cell cycle arrest were screened at 24 hpf as they have very clear phenotype by this time \u2013 these embryos are smaller and have bent tails and the heterozygous mutants and wildtype are indistinguishable.", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", "AB wild type strains were used for all HUA perturbation experiments. Zebrafish mutant line hi2648  a mutant for the gene emi1  was kindly gifted by Dr. Jennifer Rhodes. Embryos were developed within the ambient temperature of Zebrafish development. Time of fertilization at 28.5 C was used to stage each clutch and this was confirmed using morphological features of the embryos. All zebrafish were housed in a facility overseen by the Harvard Medical Area Standing Committee on Animals our IACUC which performs regular inspections and under which we have an approved protocol for all animal procedures.", "tissue:whole embryo|treatment:1percent DMSO control and cell cycle arrest at 6 hpf", "GSM8327215", "GSM8327215: Perturbation experiment 1  6 hpf 24 hpf biological replicate 3  technical replicate 1; Danio rerio; OTHER", "GSM8327215 r1", "GSM8327215", "1", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", null, "OTHER", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "NextSeq 500", null, "SRP513754", null, null, "pert_exp1_brep3_trep1_S0_L001_R1_001.fastq.gz pert_exp1_brep3_trep1_S0_L001_R2_001.fastq.gz pert_exp1_brep3_trep1_S0_L001_R3_001.fastq.gz pert_exp1_brep3_trep1_S0_L001_R4_001.fastq.gz", "fastq fastq fastq fastq", 9825258079.0, 107969869.0, "GSM8327215 r1", "0:61 1:8 2:8 3:14", "A:1892998816;C:1448298491;G:1287308183;T:1956393917;N:1162602", 61, 8, 8, 14, 1892998816, 1448298491, 1287308183, 1956393917, 1162602, "SRX24912666", "SRS21618600", "SRA1898111", "Harvard University", "Harvard University", null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, "B", null, "usable mapping rate", "illumina", "nextseq", "unknown", "other", "trueseq", "sc", "single_cell_droplet", "indrops", null, "United States", "2024-06-13", "Multi-stage", "Embryo", "Whole Organism", "All anatomical structures"], [32746, "SRR29398885", "SRX24912666", "SRS21618600", "SRP513754", "PRJNA1123686", "Cell state transitions are decoupled from cell division during early embryo development [I]", "GSE269784", "Other", "As tissues develop  cells divide and differentiate concurrently. Conflicting evidence shows that cell division is either dispensable or required for formation of cell types. To determine the role of cell division in differentiation  we arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos using two independent approaches and profiled them at single cell resolution. We show that cell division is dispensable for differentiation of all embryonic tissues during initial cell type differentiation from early gastrulation to the end of segmentation. However  in the absence of cell division  differentiation slows down in some cell types  and cells exhibit global stress responses. While differentiation is robust to blocking cell division  the proportions of cells across cell states are not but show evidence of partial compensation. This work clarifies our understanding of the role of cell division in development and showcases the utility of combining embryo wide perturbations with single cell RNA sequencing to uncover the role of common biological processes across multiple tissues. Overall design: We arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos at 6 hpf using two independent approaches: a chemical approach hydroxyurea and aphidicolin  HUA and a genetic approach involving a loss of function mutation in the gene emi1 allele hi2648. We tracked differentiation dynamics using single cell RNA sequencing scRNA seq on embryos spanning 6\u201324 hpf for HUA treated and control embryos  and at 24 hpf for emi1 mutant embryos. Overall we have collected multiple replicates for control embryos ABs at 6  8  10  14  18  21 hpf and 24 hpf  for HUA treated at 8  10  14 hpf and 24 hpf and for emi1 mutants at 24 hpf.  Details about the samples can be found in the supplementary file \"sample information.txt\"", null, "pubmed:37546736", null, "Perturbation experiment 1  6 hpf 24 hpf biological replicate 3  technical replicate 1", "GSM8327215", null, "source name:whole embryo|tissue:whole embryo|treatment:1percent DMSO control and cell cycle arrest at 6 hpf|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing", "Perturbation experiment 1  6 hpf 24 hpf biological replicate 3  technical replicate 1", "Multiple samples are pooled for each sequencing run. Raw FASTQ were prepared from Illumina bcl files in a format compatible with the inDrops.py pipeline. Each nextseq run results in 16 FASTQ files 4 lanes x 4 reads per lane. For some pooled libraries  sequencing was run twice to get more UMIs per cell and hence we have deposited 16x2 = 32 raw files for those sequencing samples. The illumina library indices of different samples in a run are provided in the meta data. These can be used to demultiplex the raw file into separate libraries. The read files from an inDrops run have the following content: * R1 001.fastq.gz : contains the three prime UTR cDNA read * R2 001.fastq.gz : contains the first half of the cell barcode * R3 001.fastq.gz : contains the library index for demultiplexing libraries * R4 001.fastq.gz : contains the second half of the barcode and the UMI.  All subsequent processing steps from FASTQ files to count matrixes were performed using the custom pipeline for inDrops data analysis github.com/indrops. Single cell transcriptomes were barcoded using inDrops Klein et al  Cell 2015. Standard transcriptome RNA seq libraries were processed as reported in Zilionis et al. Nature Protocol 2016 using inDrops v3 protocol. The transcriptome libraries were sequenced on reads Illumina NextSeq 500. Libraries used standard Illumina sequencing primers and 61 cycles for Read1  14 cycles for Read2  8 cycles each for IndexRead1 and IndexRead2. Raw fastq files was processed using inDrops.py pipeline github.com/indrops/indrops. Sequenced reads were mapped to a zebrafish reference transcriptome built from the zebrafish GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 using bowtie version 1.1.143. To obtain the final counts matrix used for data analysis  total count filters were applied as described in Kukreja et. al. 2024  method section \"Single cell RNA seq Data preprocessing\" Assembly: GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 Supplementary files format and content: Raw counts tsv.gz: cell barcode  gene names  and raw counts for all cells Supplementary files format and content: Metadata metadata.csv: library identity  cell barcode  and associated metadata for all cells   time point  treatment  replicate  annotated cell state  total number of counts  etc Library strategy: inDrops v3 scRNA seq", "whole embryo", "Zebrafish embryos were arrested for cell cycle using two complementary approaches. S phase cell cycle arrest was induced using a cocktail of drugs \u2013 hydroxyurea Sigma Aldrich H8627 5G at 20 mM and aphidicolin Sigma Aldrich A0781 5MG at 150 \u00b5M concentration in 1% dimethyl sulfoxide DMSO in egg water. G2/M phase arrest was induced by crossing heterozygous emi1 wt/mut zebrafish to generate homozygous emi1 mut/mut embryos  referred as hi2648 in the manuscript. Homozygous mutants with cell cycle arrest were screened at 24 hpf as they have very clear phenotype by this time \u2013 these embryos are smaller and have bent tails and the heterozygous mutants and wildtype are indistinguishable.", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", "AB wild type strains were used for all HUA perturbation experiments. Zebrafish mutant line hi2648  a mutant for the gene emi1  was kindly gifted by Dr. Jennifer Rhodes. Embryos were developed within the ambient temperature of Zebrafish development. Time of fertilization at 28.5 C was used to stage each clutch and this was confirmed using morphological features of the embryos. All zebrafish were housed in a facility overseen by the Harvard Medical Area Standing Committee on Animals our IACUC which performs regular inspections and under which we have an approved protocol for all animal procedures.", "tissue:whole embryo|treatment:1percent DMSO control and cell cycle arrest at 6 hpf", "GSM8327215", "GSM8327215: Perturbation experiment 1  6 hpf 24 hpf biological replicate 3  technical replicate 1; Danio rerio; OTHER", "GSM8327215 r1", "GSM8327215", "1", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", null, "OTHER", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "NextSeq 500", null, "SRP513754", null, null, "pert_exp1_brep3_trep1_S0_L002_R1_001.fastq.gz pert_exp1_brep3_trep1_S0_L002_R2_001.fastq.gz pert_exp1_brep3_trep1_S0_L002_R3_001.fastq.gz pert_exp1_brep3_trep1_S0_L002_R4_001.fastq.gz", "fastq fastq fastq fastq", 9797467225.0, 107664475.0, "GSM8327215 r2", "0:61 1:8 2:8 3:14", "A:1884493825;C:1436463441;G:1294831461;T:1950665696;N:1078552", 61, 8, 8, 14, 1884493825, 1436463441, 1294831461, 1950665696, 1078552, "SRX24912666", "SRS21618600", "SRA1898111", "Harvard University", "Harvard University", null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, "B", null, "usable mapping rate", "illumina", "nextseq", "unknown", "other", "trueseq", "sc", "single_cell_droplet", "indrops", null, "United States", "2024-06-13", "Multi-stage", "Embryo", "Whole Organism", "All anatomical structures"], [32747, "SRR29398886", "SRX24912666", "SRS21618600", "SRP513754", "PRJNA1123686", "Cell state transitions are decoupled from cell division during early embryo development [I]", "GSE269784", "Other", "As tissues develop  cells divide and differentiate concurrently. Conflicting evidence shows that cell division is either dispensable or required for formation of cell types. To determine the role of cell division in differentiation  we arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos using two independent approaches and profiled them at single cell resolution. We show that cell division is dispensable for differentiation of all embryonic tissues during initial cell type differentiation from early gastrulation to the end of segmentation. However  in the absence of cell division  differentiation slows down in some cell types  and cells exhibit global stress responses. While differentiation is robust to blocking cell division  the proportions of cells across cell states are not but show evidence of partial compensation. This work clarifies our understanding of the role of cell division in development and showcases the utility of combining embryo wide perturbations with single cell RNA sequencing to uncover the role of common biological processes across multiple tissues. Overall design: We arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos at 6 hpf using two independent approaches: a chemical approach hydroxyurea and aphidicolin  HUA and a genetic approach involving a loss of function mutation in the gene emi1 allele hi2648. We tracked differentiation dynamics using single cell RNA sequencing scRNA seq on embryos spanning 6\u201324 hpf for HUA treated and control embryos  and at 24 hpf for emi1 mutant embryos. Overall we have collected multiple replicates for control embryos ABs at 6  8  10  14  18  21 hpf and 24 hpf  for HUA treated at 8  10  14 hpf and 24 hpf and for emi1 mutants at 24 hpf.  Details about the samples can be found in the supplementary file \"sample information.txt\"", null, "pubmed:37546736", null, "Perturbation experiment 1  6 hpf 24 hpf biological replicate 3  technical replicate 1", "GSM8327215", null, "source name:whole embryo|tissue:whole embryo|treatment:1percent DMSO control and cell cycle arrest at 6 hpf|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing", "Perturbation experiment 1  6 hpf 24 hpf biological replicate 3  technical replicate 1", "Multiple samples are pooled for each sequencing run. Raw FASTQ were prepared from Illumina bcl files in a format compatible with the inDrops.py pipeline. Each nextseq run results in 16 FASTQ files 4 lanes x 4 reads per lane. For some pooled libraries  sequencing was run twice to get more UMIs per cell and hence we have deposited 16x2 = 32 raw files for those sequencing samples. The illumina library indices of different samples in a run are provided in the meta data. These can be used to demultiplex the raw file into separate libraries. The read files from an inDrops run have the following content: * R1 001.fastq.gz : contains the three prime UTR cDNA read * R2 001.fastq.gz : contains the first half of the cell barcode * R3 001.fastq.gz : contains the library index for demultiplexing libraries * R4 001.fastq.gz : contains the second half of the barcode and the UMI.  All subsequent processing steps from FASTQ files to count matrixes were performed using the custom pipeline for inDrops data analysis github.com/indrops. Single cell transcriptomes were barcoded using inDrops Klein et al  Cell 2015. Standard transcriptome RNA seq libraries were processed as reported in Zilionis et al. Nature Protocol 2016 using inDrops v3 protocol. The transcriptome libraries were sequenced on reads Illumina NextSeq 500. Libraries used standard Illumina sequencing primers and 61 cycles for Read1  14 cycles for Read2  8 cycles each for IndexRead1 and IndexRead2. Raw fastq files was processed using inDrops.py pipeline github.com/indrops/indrops. Sequenced reads were mapped to a zebrafish reference transcriptome built from the zebrafish GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 using bowtie version 1.1.143. To obtain the final counts matrix used for data analysis  total count filters were applied as described in Kukreja et. al. 2024  method section \"Single cell RNA seq Data preprocessing\" Assembly: GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 Supplementary files format and content: Raw counts tsv.gz: cell barcode  gene names  and raw counts for all cells Supplementary files format and content: Metadata metadata.csv: library identity  cell barcode  and associated metadata for all cells   time point  treatment  replicate  annotated cell state  total number of counts  etc Library strategy: inDrops v3 scRNA seq", "whole embryo", "Zebrafish embryos were arrested for cell cycle using two complementary approaches. S phase cell cycle arrest was induced using a cocktail of drugs \u2013 hydroxyurea Sigma Aldrich H8627 5G at 20 mM and aphidicolin Sigma Aldrich A0781 5MG at 150 \u00b5M concentration in 1% dimethyl sulfoxide DMSO in egg water. G2/M phase arrest was induced by crossing heterozygous emi1 wt/mut zebrafish to generate homozygous emi1 mut/mut embryos  referred as hi2648 in the manuscript. Homozygous mutants with cell cycle arrest were screened at 24 hpf as they have very clear phenotype by this time \u2013 these embryos are smaller and have bent tails and the heterozygous mutants and wildtype are indistinguishable.", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", "AB wild type strains were used for all HUA perturbation experiments. Zebrafish mutant line hi2648  a mutant for the gene emi1  was kindly gifted by Dr. Jennifer Rhodes. Embryos were developed within the ambient temperature of Zebrafish development. Time of fertilization at 28.5 C was used to stage each clutch and this was confirmed using morphological features of the embryos. All zebrafish were housed in a facility overseen by the Harvard Medical Area Standing Committee on Animals our IACUC which performs regular inspections and under which we have an approved protocol for all animal procedures.", "tissue:whole embryo|treatment:1percent DMSO control and cell cycle arrest at 6 hpf", "GSM8327215", "GSM8327215: Perturbation experiment 1  6 hpf 24 hpf biological replicate 3  technical replicate 1; Danio rerio; OTHER", "GSM8327215 r1", "GSM8327215", "1", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", null, "OTHER", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "NextSeq 500", null, "SRP513754", null, null, "pert_exp1_brep3_trep1_S0_L003_R1_001.fastq.gz pert_exp1_brep3_trep1_S0_L003_R2_001.fastq.gz pert_exp1_brep3_trep1_S0_L003_R3_001.fastq.gz pert_exp1_brep3_trep1_S0_L003_R4_001.fastq.gz", "fastq fastq fastq fastq", 9945377715.0, 109289865.0, "GSM8327215 r3", "0:61 1:8 2:8 3:14", "A:1919403458;C:1456796407;G:1307295125;T:1982126987;N:1059788", 61, 8, 8, 14, 1919403458, 1456796407, 1307295125, 1982126987, 1059788, "SRX24912666", "SRS21618600", "SRA1898111", "Harvard University", "Harvard University", null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, "B", null, "usable mapping rate", "illumina", "nextseq", "unknown", "other", "trueseq", "sc", "single_cell_droplet", "indrops", null, "United States", "2024-06-13", "Multi-stage", "Embryo", "Whole Organism", "All anatomical structures"], [32748, "SRR29398887", "SRX24912666", "SRS21618600", "SRP513754", "PRJNA1123686", "Cell state transitions are decoupled from cell division during early embryo development [I]", "GSE269784", "Other", "As tissues develop  cells divide and differentiate concurrently. Conflicting evidence shows that cell division is either dispensable or required for formation of cell types. To determine the role of cell division in differentiation  we arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos using two independent approaches and profiled them at single cell resolution. We show that cell division is dispensable for differentiation of all embryonic tissues during initial cell type differentiation from early gastrulation to the end of segmentation. However  in the absence of cell division  differentiation slows down in some cell types  and cells exhibit global stress responses. While differentiation is robust to blocking cell division  the proportions of cells across cell states are not but show evidence of partial compensation. This work clarifies our understanding of the role of cell division in development and showcases the utility of combining embryo wide perturbations with single cell RNA sequencing to uncover the role of common biological processes across multiple tissues. Overall design: We arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos at 6 hpf using two independent approaches: a chemical approach hydroxyurea and aphidicolin  HUA and a genetic approach involving a loss of function mutation in the gene emi1 allele hi2648. We tracked differentiation dynamics using single cell RNA sequencing scRNA seq on embryos spanning 6\u201324 hpf for HUA treated and control embryos  and at 24 hpf for emi1 mutant embryos. Overall we have collected multiple replicates for control embryos ABs at 6  8  10  14  18  21 hpf and 24 hpf  for HUA treated at 8  10  14 hpf and 24 hpf and for emi1 mutants at 24 hpf.  Details about the samples can be found in the supplementary file \"sample information.txt\"", null, "pubmed:37546736", null, "Perturbation experiment 1  6 hpf 24 hpf biological replicate 3  technical replicate 1", "GSM8327215", null, "source name:whole embryo|tissue:whole embryo|treatment:1percent DMSO control and cell cycle arrest at 6 hpf|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing", "Perturbation experiment 1  6 hpf 24 hpf biological replicate 3  technical replicate 1", "Multiple samples are pooled for each sequencing run. Raw FASTQ were prepared from Illumina bcl files in a format compatible with the inDrops.py pipeline. Each nextseq run results in 16 FASTQ files 4 lanes x 4 reads per lane. For some pooled libraries  sequencing was run twice to get more UMIs per cell and hence we have deposited 16x2 = 32 raw files for those sequencing samples. The illumina library indices of different samples in a run are provided in the meta data. These can be used to demultiplex the raw file into separate libraries. The read files from an inDrops run have the following content: * R1 001.fastq.gz : contains the three prime UTR cDNA read * R2 001.fastq.gz : contains the first half of the cell barcode * R3 001.fastq.gz : contains the library index for demultiplexing libraries * R4 001.fastq.gz : contains the second half of the barcode and the UMI.  All subsequent processing steps from FASTQ files to count matrixes were performed using the custom pipeline for inDrops data analysis github.com/indrops. Single cell transcriptomes were barcoded using inDrops Klein et al  Cell 2015. Standard transcriptome RNA seq libraries were processed as reported in Zilionis et al. Nature Protocol 2016 using inDrops v3 protocol. The transcriptome libraries were sequenced on reads Illumina NextSeq 500. Libraries used standard Illumina sequencing primers and 61 cycles for Read1  14 cycles for Read2  8 cycles each for IndexRead1 and IndexRead2. Raw fastq files was processed using inDrops.py pipeline github.com/indrops/indrops. Sequenced reads were mapped to a zebrafish reference transcriptome built from the zebrafish GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 using bowtie version 1.1.143. To obtain the final counts matrix used for data analysis  total count filters were applied as described in Kukreja et. al. 2024  method section \"Single cell RNA seq Data preprocessing\" Assembly: GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 Supplementary files format and content: Raw counts tsv.gz: cell barcode  gene names  and raw counts for all cells Supplementary files format and content: Metadata metadata.csv: library identity  cell barcode  and associated metadata for all cells   time point  treatment  replicate  annotated cell state  total number of counts  etc Library strategy: inDrops v3 scRNA seq", "whole embryo", "Zebrafish embryos were arrested for cell cycle using two complementary approaches. S phase cell cycle arrest was induced using a cocktail of drugs \u2013 hydroxyurea Sigma Aldrich H8627 5G at 20 mM and aphidicolin Sigma Aldrich A0781 5MG at 150 \u00b5M concentration in 1% dimethyl sulfoxide DMSO in egg water. G2/M phase arrest was induced by crossing heterozygous emi1 wt/mut zebrafish to generate homozygous emi1 mut/mut embryos  referred as hi2648 in the manuscript. Homozygous mutants with cell cycle arrest were screened at 24 hpf as they have very clear phenotype by this time \u2013 these embryos are smaller and have bent tails and the heterozygous mutants and wildtype are indistinguishable.", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", "AB wild type strains were used for all HUA perturbation experiments. Zebrafish mutant line hi2648  a mutant for the gene emi1  was kindly gifted by Dr. Jennifer Rhodes. Embryos were developed within the ambient temperature of Zebrafish development. Time of fertilization at 28.5 C was used to stage each clutch and this was confirmed using morphological features of the embryos. All zebrafish were housed in a facility overseen by the Harvard Medical Area Standing Committee on Animals our IACUC which performs regular inspections and under which we have an approved protocol for all animal procedures.", "tissue:whole embryo|treatment:1percent DMSO control and cell cycle arrest at 6 hpf", "GSM8327215", "GSM8327215: Perturbation experiment 1  6 hpf 24 hpf biological replicate 3  technical replicate 1; Danio rerio; OTHER", "GSM8327215 r1", "GSM8327215", "1", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", null, "OTHER", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "NextSeq 500", null, "SRP513754", null, null, "pert_exp1_brep3_trep1_S0_L004_R1_001.fastq.gz pert_exp1_brep3_trep1_S0_L004_R2_001.fastq.gz pert_exp1_brep3_trep1_S0_L004_R3_001.fastq.gz pert_exp1_brep3_trep1_S0_L004_R4_001.fastq.gz", "fastq fastq fastq fastq", 9799158005.0, 107683055.0, "GSM8327215 r4", "0:61 1:8 2:8 3:14", "A:1887332404;C:1443564157;G:1288767599;T:1948048686;N:953509", 61, 8, 8, 14, 1887332404, 1443564157, 1288767599, 1948048686, 953509, "SRX24912666", "SRS21618600", "SRA1898111", "Harvard University", "Harvard University", null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, "B", null, "usable mapping rate", "illumina", "nextseq", "unknown", "other", "trueseq", "sc", "single_cell_droplet", "indrops", null, "United States", "2024-06-13", "Multi-stage", "Embryo", "Whole Organism", "All anatomical structures"], [32749, "SRR29398888", "SRX24912665", "SRS21618599", "SRP513754", "PRJNA1123686", "Cell state transitions are decoupled from cell division during early embryo development [I]", "GSE269784", "Other", "As tissues develop  cells divide and differentiate concurrently. Conflicting evidence shows that cell division is either dispensable or required for formation of cell types. To determine the role of cell division in differentiation  we arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos using two independent approaches and profiled them at single cell resolution. We show that cell division is dispensable for differentiation of all embryonic tissues during initial cell type differentiation from early gastrulation to the end of segmentation. However  in the absence of cell division  differentiation slows down in some cell types  and cells exhibit global stress responses. While differentiation is robust to blocking cell division  the proportions of cells across cell states are not but show evidence of partial compensation. This work clarifies our understanding of the role of cell division in development and showcases the utility of combining embryo wide perturbations with single cell RNA sequencing to uncover the role of common biological processes across multiple tissues. Overall design: We arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos at 6 hpf using two independent approaches: a chemical approach hydroxyurea and aphidicolin  HUA and a genetic approach involving a loss of function mutation in the gene emi1 allele hi2648. We tracked differentiation dynamics using single cell RNA sequencing scRNA seq on embryos spanning 6\u201324 hpf for HUA treated and control embryos  and at 24 hpf for emi1 mutant embryos. Overall we have collected multiple replicates for control embryos ABs at 6  8  10  14  18  21 hpf and 24 hpf  for HUA treated at 8  10  14 hpf and 24 hpf and for emi1 mutants at 24 hpf.  Details about the samples can be found in the supplementary file \"sample information.txt\"", null, "pubmed:37546736", null, "Perturbation experiment 1  6 hpf 14 hpf biological replicate 1  technical replicate 1", "GSM8327213", null, "source name:whole embryo|tissue:whole embryo|treatment:1percent DMSO control and cell cycle arrest at 6 hpf|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing", "Perturbation experiment 1  6 hpf 14 hpf biological replicate 1  technical replicate 1", "Multiple samples are pooled for each sequencing run. Raw FASTQ were prepared from Illumina bcl files in a format compatible with the inDrops.py pipeline. Each nextseq run results in 16 FASTQ files 4 lanes x 4 reads per lane. For some pooled libraries  sequencing was run twice to get more UMIs per cell and hence we have deposited 16x2 = 32 raw files for those sequencing samples. The illumina library indices of different samples in a run are provided in the meta data. These can be used to demultiplex the raw file into separate libraries. The read files from an inDrops run have the following content: * R1 001.fastq.gz : contains the three prime UTR cDNA read * R2 001.fastq.gz : contains the first half of the cell barcode * R3 001.fastq.gz : contains the library index for demultiplexing libraries * R4 001.fastq.gz : contains the second half of the barcode and the UMI.  All subsequent processing steps from FASTQ files to count matrixes were performed using the custom pipeline for inDrops data analysis github.com/indrops. Single cell transcriptomes were barcoded using inDrops Klein et al  Cell 2015. Standard transcriptome RNA seq libraries were processed as reported in Zilionis et al. Nature Protocol 2016 using inDrops v3 protocol. The transcriptome libraries were sequenced on reads Illumina NextSeq 500. Libraries used standard Illumina sequencing primers and 61 cycles for Read1  14 cycles for Read2  8 cycles each for IndexRead1 and IndexRead2. Raw fastq files was processed using inDrops.py pipeline github.com/indrops/indrops. Sequenced reads were mapped to a zebrafish reference transcriptome built from the zebrafish GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 using bowtie version 1.1.143. To obtain the final counts matrix used for data analysis  total count filters were applied as described in Kukreja et. al. 2024  method section \"Single cell RNA seq Data preprocessing\" Assembly: GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 Supplementary files format and content: Raw counts tsv.gz: cell barcode  gene names  and raw counts for all cells Supplementary files format and content: Metadata metadata.csv: library identity  cell barcode  and associated metadata for all cells   time point  treatment  replicate  annotated cell state  total number of counts  etc Library strategy: inDrops v3 scRNA seq", "whole embryo", "Zebrafish embryos were arrested for cell cycle using two complementary approaches. S phase cell cycle arrest was induced using a cocktail of drugs \u2013 hydroxyurea Sigma Aldrich H8627 5G at 20 mM and aphidicolin Sigma Aldrich A0781 5MG at 150 \u00b5M concentration in 1% dimethyl sulfoxide DMSO in egg water. G2/M phase arrest was induced by crossing heterozygous emi1 wt/mut zebrafish to generate homozygous emi1 mut/mut embryos  referred as hi2648 in the manuscript. Homozygous mutants with cell cycle arrest were screened at 24 hpf as they have very clear phenotype by this time \u2013 these embryos are smaller and have bent tails and the heterozygous mutants and wildtype are indistinguishable.", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", "AB wild type strains were used for all HUA perturbation experiments. Zebrafish mutant line hi2648  a mutant for the gene emi1  was kindly gifted by Dr. Jennifer Rhodes. Embryos were developed within the ambient temperature of Zebrafish development. Time of fertilization at 28.5 C was used to stage each clutch and this was confirmed using morphological features of the embryos. All zebrafish were housed in a facility overseen by the Harvard Medical Area Standing Committee on Animals our IACUC which performs regular inspections and under which we have an approved protocol for all animal procedures.", "tissue:whole embryo|treatment:1percent DMSO control and cell cycle arrest at 6 hpf", "GSM8327213", "GSM8327213: Perturbation experiment 1  6 hpf 14 hpf biological replicate 1  technical replicate 1; Danio rerio; OTHER", "GSM8327213 r1", "GSM8327213", "1", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", null, "OTHER", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "NextSeq 500", null, "SRP513754", null, null, "pert_exp1_brep1_trep1_S0_L001_R1_001_run1.fastq.gz pert_exp1_brep1_trep1_S0_L001_R2_001_run1.fastq.gz pert_exp1_brep1_trep1_S0_L001_R3_001_run1.fastq.gz pert_exp1_brep1_trep1_S0_L001_R4_001_run1.fastq.gz", "fastq fastq fastq fastq", 5753105540.0, 63220940.0, "GSM8327213 r1", "0:61 1:8 2:8 3:14", "A:1174237214;C:759555395;G:705449866;T:1217212379;N:22486", 61, 8, 8, 14, 1174237214, 759555395, 705449866, 1217212379, 22486, "SRX24912665", "SRS21618599", "SRA1898111", "Harvard University", "Harvard University", null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, "B", null, "usable mapping rate", "illumina", "nextseq", "unknown", "other", "trueseq", "sc", "single_cell_droplet", "indrops", null, "United States", "2024-06-13", "Multi-stage", "Embryo", "Whole Organism", "All anatomical structures"], [32750, "SRR29398889", "SRX24912665", "SRS21618599", "SRP513754", "PRJNA1123686", "Cell state transitions are decoupled from cell division during early embryo development [I]", "GSE269784", "Other", "As tissues develop  cells divide and differentiate concurrently. Conflicting evidence shows that cell division is either dispensable or required for formation of cell types. To determine the role of cell division in differentiation  we arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos using two independent approaches and profiled them at single cell resolution. We show that cell division is dispensable for differentiation of all embryonic tissues during initial cell type differentiation from early gastrulation to the end of segmentation. However  in the absence of cell division  differentiation slows down in some cell types  and cells exhibit global stress responses. While differentiation is robust to blocking cell division  the proportions of cells across cell states are not but show evidence of partial compensation. This work clarifies our understanding of the role of cell division in development and showcases the utility of combining embryo wide perturbations with single cell RNA sequencing to uncover the role of common biological processes across multiple tissues. Overall design: We arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos at 6 hpf using two independent approaches: a chemical approach hydroxyurea and aphidicolin  HUA and a genetic approach involving a loss of function mutation in the gene emi1 allele hi2648. We tracked differentiation dynamics using single cell RNA sequencing scRNA seq on embryos spanning 6\u201324 hpf for HUA treated and control embryos  and at 24 hpf for emi1 mutant embryos. Overall we have collected multiple replicates for control embryos ABs at 6  8  10  14  18  21 hpf and 24 hpf  for HUA treated at 8  10  14 hpf and 24 hpf and for emi1 mutants at 24 hpf.  Details about the samples can be found in the supplementary file \"sample information.txt\"", null, "pubmed:37546736", null, "Perturbation experiment 1  6 hpf 14 hpf biological replicate 1  technical replicate 1", "GSM8327213", null, "source name:whole embryo|tissue:whole embryo|treatment:1percent DMSO control and cell cycle arrest at 6 hpf|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing", "Perturbation experiment 1  6 hpf 14 hpf biological replicate 1  technical replicate 1", "Multiple samples are pooled for each sequencing run. Raw FASTQ were prepared from Illumina bcl files in a format compatible with the inDrops.py pipeline. Each nextseq run results in 16 FASTQ files 4 lanes x 4 reads per lane. For some pooled libraries  sequencing was run twice to get more UMIs per cell and hence we have deposited 16x2 = 32 raw files for those sequencing samples. The illumina library indices of different samples in a run are provided in the meta data. These can be used to demultiplex the raw file into separate libraries. The read files from an inDrops run have the following content: * R1 001.fastq.gz : contains the three prime UTR cDNA read * R2 001.fastq.gz : contains the first half of the cell barcode * R3 001.fastq.gz : contains the library index for demultiplexing libraries * R4 001.fastq.gz : contains the second half of the barcode and the UMI.  All subsequent processing steps from FASTQ files to count matrixes were performed using the custom pipeline for inDrops data analysis github.com/indrops. Single cell transcriptomes were barcoded using inDrops Klein et al  Cell 2015. Standard transcriptome RNA seq libraries were processed as reported in Zilionis et al. Nature Protocol 2016 using inDrops v3 protocol. The transcriptome libraries were sequenced on reads Illumina NextSeq 500. Libraries used standard Illumina sequencing primers and 61 cycles for Read1  14 cycles for Read2  8 cycles each for IndexRead1 and IndexRead2. Raw fastq files was processed using inDrops.py pipeline github.com/indrops/indrops. Sequenced reads were mapped to a zebrafish reference transcriptome built from the zebrafish GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 using bowtie version 1.1.143. To obtain the final counts matrix used for data analysis  total count filters were applied as described in Kukreja et. al. 2024  method section \"Single cell RNA seq Data preprocessing\" Assembly: GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 Supplementary files format and content: Raw counts tsv.gz: cell barcode  gene names  and raw counts for all cells Supplementary files format and content: Metadata metadata.csv: library identity  cell barcode  and associated metadata for all cells   time point  treatment  replicate  annotated cell state  total number of counts  etc Library strategy: inDrops v3 scRNA seq", "whole embryo", "Zebrafish embryos were arrested for cell cycle using two complementary approaches. S phase cell cycle arrest was induced using a cocktail of drugs \u2013 hydroxyurea Sigma Aldrich H8627 5G at 20 mM and aphidicolin Sigma Aldrich A0781 5MG at 150 \u00b5M concentration in 1% dimethyl sulfoxide DMSO in egg water. G2/M phase arrest was induced by crossing heterozygous emi1 wt/mut zebrafish to generate homozygous emi1 mut/mut embryos  referred as hi2648 in the manuscript. Homozygous mutants with cell cycle arrest were screened at 24 hpf as they have very clear phenotype by this time \u2013 these embryos are smaller and have bent tails and the heterozygous mutants and wildtype are indistinguishable.", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", "AB wild type strains were used for all HUA perturbation experiments. Zebrafish mutant line hi2648  a mutant for the gene emi1  was kindly gifted by Dr. Jennifer Rhodes. Embryos were developed within the ambient temperature of Zebrafish development. Time of fertilization at 28.5 C was used to stage each clutch and this was confirmed using morphological features of the embryos. All zebrafish were housed in a facility overseen by the Harvard Medical Area Standing Committee on Animals our IACUC which performs regular inspections and under which we have an approved protocol for all animal procedures.", "tissue:whole embryo|treatment:1percent DMSO control and cell cycle arrest at 6 hpf", "GSM8327213", "GSM8327213: Perturbation experiment 1  6 hpf 14 hpf biological replicate 1  technical replicate 1; Danio rerio; OTHER", "GSM8327213 r1", "GSM8327213", "1", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", null, "OTHER", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "NextSeq 500", null, "SRP513754", null, null, "pert_exp1_brep1_trep1_S0_L002_R1_001_run1.fastq.gz pert_exp1_brep1_trep1_S0_L002_R2_001_run1.fastq.gz pert_exp1_brep1_trep1_S0_L002_R3_001_run1.fastq.gz pert_exp1_brep1_trep1_S0_L002_R4_001_run1.fastq.gz", "fastq fastq fastq fastq", 5588689379.0, 61414169.0, "GSM8327213 r2", "0:61 1:8 2:8 3:14", "A:1135353331;C:739291995;G:689386853;T:1182212845;N:19285", 61, 8, 8, 14, 1135353331, 739291995, 689386853, 1182212845, 19285, "SRX24912665", "SRS21618599", "SRA1898111", "Harvard University", "Harvard University", null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, "B", null, "usable mapping rate", "illumina", "nextseq", "unknown", "other", "trueseq", "sc", "single_cell_droplet", "indrops", null, "United States", "2024-06-13", "Multi-stage", "Embryo", "Whole Organism", "All anatomical structures"], [32751, "SRR29398890", "SRX24912665", "SRS21618599", "SRP513754", "PRJNA1123686", "Cell state transitions are decoupled from cell division during early embryo development [I]", "GSE269784", "Other", "As tissues develop  cells divide and differentiate concurrently. Conflicting evidence shows that cell division is either dispensable or required for formation of cell types. To determine the role of cell division in differentiation  we arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos using two independent approaches and profiled them at single cell resolution. We show that cell division is dispensable for differentiation of all embryonic tissues during initial cell type differentiation from early gastrulation to the end of segmentation. However  in the absence of cell division  differentiation slows down in some cell types  and cells exhibit global stress responses. While differentiation is robust to blocking cell division  the proportions of cells across cell states are not but show evidence of partial compensation. This work clarifies our understanding of the role of cell division in development and showcases the utility of combining embryo wide perturbations with single cell RNA sequencing to uncover the role of common biological processes across multiple tissues. Overall design: We arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos at 6 hpf using two independent approaches: a chemical approach hydroxyurea and aphidicolin  HUA and a genetic approach involving a loss of function mutation in the gene emi1 allele hi2648. We tracked differentiation dynamics using single cell RNA sequencing scRNA seq on embryos spanning 6\u201324 hpf for HUA treated and control embryos  and at 24 hpf for emi1 mutant embryos. Overall we have collected multiple replicates for control embryos ABs at 6  8  10  14  18  21 hpf and 24 hpf  for HUA treated at 8  10  14 hpf and 24 hpf and for emi1 mutants at 24 hpf.  Details about the samples can be found in the supplementary file \"sample information.txt\"", null, "pubmed:37546736", null, "Perturbation experiment 1  6 hpf 14 hpf biological replicate 1  technical replicate 1", "GSM8327213", null, "source name:whole embryo|tissue:whole embryo|treatment:1percent DMSO control and cell cycle arrest at 6 hpf|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing", "Perturbation experiment 1  6 hpf 14 hpf biological replicate 1  technical replicate 1", "Multiple samples are pooled for each sequencing run. Raw FASTQ were prepared from Illumina bcl files in a format compatible with the inDrops.py pipeline. Each nextseq run results in 16 FASTQ files 4 lanes x 4 reads per lane. For some pooled libraries  sequencing was run twice to get more UMIs per cell and hence we have deposited 16x2 = 32 raw files for those sequencing samples. The illumina library indices of different samples in a run are provided in the meta data. These can be used to demultiplex the raw file into separate libraries. The read files from an inDrops run have the following content: * R1 001.fastq.gz : contains the three prime UTR cDNA read * R2 001.fastq.gz : contains the first half of the cell barcode * R3 001.fastq.gz : contains the library index for demultiplexing libraries * R4 001.fastq.gz : contains the second half of the barcode and the UMI.  All subsequent processing steps from FASTQ files to count matrixes were performed using the custom pipeline for inDrops data analysis github.com/indrops. Single cell transcriptomes were barcoded using inDrops Klein et al  Cell 2015. Standard transcriptome RNA seq libraries were processed as reported in Zilionis et al. Nature Protocol 2016 using inDrops v3 protocol. The transcriptome libraries were sequenced on reads Illumina NextSeq 500. Libraries used standard Illumina sequencing primers and 61 cycles for Read1  14 cycles for Read2  8 cycles each for IndexRead1 and IndexRead2. Raw fastq files was processed using inDrops.py pipeline github.com/indrops/indrops. Sequenced reads were mapped to a zebrafish reference transcriptome built from the zebrafish GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 using bowtie version 1.1.143. To obtain the final counts matrix used for data analysis  total count filters were applied as described in Kukreja et. al. 2024  method section \"Single cell RNA seq Data preprocessing\" Assembly: GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 Supplementary files format and content: Raw counts tsv.gz: cell barcode  gene names  and raw counts for all cells Supplementary files format and content: Metadata metadata.csv: library identity  cell barcode  and associated metadata for all cells   time point  treatment  replicate  annotated cell state  total number of counts  etc Library strategy: inDrops v3 scRNA seq", "whole embryo", "Zebrafish embryos were arrested for cell cycle using two complementary approaches. S phase cell cycle arrest was induced using a cocktail of drugs \u2013 hydroxyurea Sigma Aldrich H8627 5G at 20 mM and aphidicolin Sigma Aldrich A0781 5MG at 150 \u00b5M concentration in 1% dimethyl sulfoxide DMSO in egg water. G2/M phase arrest was induced by crossing heterozygous emi1 wt/mut zebrafish to generate homozygous emi1 mut/mut embryos  referred as hi2648 in the manuscript. Homozygous mutants with cell cycle arrest were screened at 24 hpf as they have very clear phenotype by this time \u2013 these embryos are smaller and have bent tails and the heterozygous mutants and wildtype are indistinguishable.", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", "AB wild type strains were used for all HUA perturbation experiments. Zebrafish mutant line hi2648  a mutant for the gene emi1  was kindly gifted by Dr. Jennifer Rhodes. Embryos were developed within the ambient temperature of Zebrafish development. Time of fertilization at 28.5 C was used to stage each clutch and this was confirmed using morphological features of the embryos. All zebrafish were housed in a facility overseen by the Harvard Medical Area Standing Committee on Animals our IACUC which performs regular inspections and under which we have an approved protocol for all animal procedures.", "tissue:whole embryo|treatment:1percent DMSO control and cell cycle arrest at 6 hpf", "GSM8327213", "GSM8327213: Perturbation experiment 1  6 hpf 14 hpf biological replicate 1  technical replicate 1; Danio rerio; OTHER", "GSM8327213 r1", "GSM8327213", "1", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", null, "OTHER", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "NextSeq 500", null, "SRP513754", null, null, "pert_exp1_brep1_trep1_S0_L003_R1_001_run1.fastq.gz pert_exp1_brep1_trep1_S0_L003_R2_001_run1.fastq.gz pert_exp1_brep1_trep1_S0_L003_R3_001_run1.fastq.gz pert_exp1_brep1_trep1_S0_L003_R4_001_run1.fastq.gz", "fastq fastq fastq fastq", 5731949769.0, 62988459.0, "GSM8327213 r3", "0:61 1:8 2:8 3:14", "A:1167937533;C:754846871;G:708985526;T:1210491951;N:34118", 61, 8, 8, 14, 1167937533, 754846871, 708985526, 1210491951, 34118, "SRX24912665", "SRS21618599", "SRA1898111", "Harvard University", "Harvard University", null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, "B", null, "usable mapping rate", "illumina", "nextseq", "unknown", "other", "trueseq", "sc", "single_cell_droplet", "indrops", null, "United States", "2024-06-13", "Multi-stage", "Embryo", "Whole Organism", "All anatomical structures"], [32752, "SRR29398891", "SRX24912665", "SRS21618599", "SRP513754", "PRJNA1123686", "Cell state transitions are decoupled from cell division during early embryo development [I]", "GSE269784", "Other", "As tissues develop  cells divide and differentiate concurrently. Conflicting evidence shows that cell division is either dispensable or required for formation of cell types. To determine the role of cell division in differentiation  we arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos using two independent approaches and profiled them at single cell resolution. We show that cell division is dispensable for differentiation of all embryonic tissues during initial cell type differentiation from early gastrulation to the end of segmentation. However  in the absence of cell division  differentiation slows down in some cell types  and cells exhibit global stress responses. While differentiation is robust to blocking cell division  the proportions of cells across cell states are not but show evidence of partial compensation. This work clarifies our understanding of the role of cell division in development and showcases the utility of combining embryo wide perturbations with single cell RNA sequencing to uncover the role of common biological processes across multiple tissues. Overall design: We arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos at 6 hpf using two independent approaches: a chemical approach hydroxyurea and aphidicolin  HUA and a genetic approach involving a loss of function mutation in the gene emi1 allele hi2648. We tracked differentiation dynamics using single cell RNA sequencing scRNA seq on embryos spanning 6\u201324 hpf for HUA treated and control embryos  and at 24 hpf for emi1 mutant embryos. Overall we have collected multiple replicates for control embryos ABs at 6  8  10  14  18  21 hpf and 24 hpf  for HUA treated at 8  10  14 hpf and 24 hpf and for emi1 mutants at 24 hpf.  Details about the samples can be found in the supplementary file \"sample information.txt\"", null, "pubmed:37546736", null, "Perturbation experiment 1  6 hpf 14 hpf biological replicate 1  technical replicate 1", "GSM8327213", null, "source name:whole embryo|tissue:whole embryo|treatment:1percent DMSO control and cell cycle arrest at 6 hpf|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing", "Perturbation experiment 1  6 hpf 14 hpf biological replicate 1  technical replicate 1", "Multiple samples are pooled for each sequencing run. Raw FASTQ were prepared from Illumina bcl files in a format compatible with the inDrops.py pipeline. Each nextseq run results in 16 FASTQ files 4 lanes x 4 reads per lane. For some pooled libraries  sequencing was run twice to get more UMIs per cell and hence we have deposited 16x2 = 32 raw files for those sequencing samples. The illumina library indices of different samples in a run are provided in the meta data. These can be used to demultiplex the raw file into separate libraries. The read files from an inDrops run have the following content: * R1 001.fastq.gz : contains the three prime UTR cDNA read * R2 001.fastq.gz : contains the first half of the cell barcode * R3 001.fastq.gz : contains the library index for demultiplexing libraries * R4 001.fastq.gz : contains the second half of the barcode and the UMI.  All subsequent processing steps from FASTQ files to count matrixes were performed using the custom pipeline for inDrops data analysis github.com/indrops. Single cell transcriptomes were barcoded using inDrops Klein et al  Cell 2015. Standard transcriptome RNA seq libraries were processed as reported in Zilionis et al. Nature Protocol 2016 using inDrops v3 protocol. The transcriptome libraries were sequenced on reads Illumina NextSeq 500. Libraries used standard Illumina sequencing primers and 61 cycles for Read1  14 cycles for Read2  8 cycles each for IndexRead1 and IndexRead2. Raw fastq files was processed using inDrops.py pipeline github.com/indrops/indrops. Sequenced reads were mapped to a zebrafish reference transcriptome built from the zebrafish GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 using bowtie version 1.1.143. To obtain the final counts matrix used for data analysis  total count filters were applied as described in Kukreja et. al. 2024  method section \"Single cell RNA seq Data preprocessing\" Assembly: GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 Supplementary files format and content: Raw counts tsv.gz: cell barcode  gene names  and raw counts for all cells Supplementary files format and content: Metadata metadata.csv: library identity  cell barcode  and associated metadata for all cells   time point  treatment  replicate  annotated cell state  total number of counts  etc Library strategy: inDrops v3 scRNA seq", "whole embryo", "Zebrafish embryos were arrested for cell cycle using two complementary approaches. S phase cell cycle arrest was induced using a cocktail of drugs \u2013 hydroxyurea Sigma Aldrich H8627 5G at 20 mM and aphidicolin Sigma Aldrich A0781 5MG at 150 \u00b5M concentration in 1% dimethyl sulfoxide DMSO in egg water. G2/M phase arrest was induced by crossing heterozygous emi1 wt/mut zebrafish to generate homozygous emi1 mut/mut embryos  referred as hi2648 in the manuscript. Homozygous mutants with cell cycle arrest were screened at 24 hpf as they have very clear phenotype by this time \u2013 these embryos are smaller and have bent tails and the heterozygous mutants and wildtype are indistinguishable.", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", "AB wild type strains were used for all HUA perturbation experiments. Zebrafish mutant line hi2648  a mutant for the gene emi1  was kindly gifted by Dr. Jennifer Rhodes. Embryos were developed within the ambient temperature of Zebrafish development. Time of fertilization at 28.5 C was used to stage each clutch and this was confirmed using morphological features of the embryos. All zebrafish were housed in a facility overseen by the Harvard Medical Area Standing Committee on Animals our IACUC which performs regular inspections and under which we have an approved protocol for all animal procedures.", "tissue:whole embryo|treatment:1percent DMSO control and cell cycle arrest at 6 hpf", "GSM8327213", "GSM8327213: Perturbation experiment 1  6 hpf 14 hpf biological replicate 1  technical replicate 1; Danio rerio; OTHER", "GSM8327213 r1", "GSM8327213", "1", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", null, "OTHER", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "NextSeq 500", null, "SRP513754", null, null, "pert_exp1_brep1_trep1_S0_L002_R1_001_run2.fastq.gz pert_exp1_brep1_trep1_S0_L002_R2_001_run2.fastq.gz pert_exp1_brep1_trep1_S0_L002_R3_001_run2.fastq.gz pert_exp1_brep1_trep1_S0_L002_R4_001_run2.fastq.gz", "fastq fastq fastq fastq", 7183714902.0, 78941922.0, "GSM8327213 r6", "0:61 1:8 2:8 3:14", "A:1413777790;C:968745759;G:906288455;T:1526622859;N:22379", 61, 8, 8, 14, 1413777790, 968745759, 906288455, 1526622859, 22379, "SRX24912665", "SRS21618599", "SRA1898111", "Harvard University", "Harvard University", null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, "B", null, "usable mapping rate", "illumina", "nextseq", "unknown", "other", "trueseq", "sc", "single_cell_droplet", "indrops", null, "United States", "2024-06-13", "Multi-stage", "Embryo", "Whole Organism", "All anatomical structures"], [32753, "SRR29398892", "SRX24912665", "SRS21618599", "SRP513754", "PRJNA1123686", "Cell state transitions are decoupled from cell division during early embryo development [I]", "GSE269784", "Other", "As tissues develop  cells divide and differentiate concurrently. Conflicting evidence shows that cell division is either dispensable or required for formation of cell types. To determine the role of cell division in differentiation  we arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos using two independent approaches and profiled them at single cell resolution. We show that cell division is dispensable for differentiation of all embryonic tissues during initial cell type differentiation from early gastrulation to the end of segmentation. However  in the absence of cell division  differentiation slows down in some cell types  and cells exhibit global stress responses. While differentiation is robust to blocking cell division  the proportions of cells across cell states are not but show evidence of partial compensation. This work clarifies our understanding of the role of cell division in development and showcases the utility of combining embryo wide perturbations with single cell RNA sequencing to uncover the role of common biological processes across multiple tissues. Overall design: We arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos at 6 hpf using two independent approaches: a chemical approach hydroxyurea and aphidicolin  HUA and a genetic approach involving a loss of function mutation in the gene emi1 allele hi2648. We tracked differentiation dynamics using single cell RNA sequencing scRNA seq on embryos spanning 6\u201324 hpf for HUA treated and control embryos  and at 24 hpf for emi1 mutant embryos. Overall we have collected multiple replicates for control embryos ABs at 6  8  10  14  18  21 hpf and 24 hpf  for HUA treated at 8  10  14 hpf and 24 hpf and for emi1 mutants at 24 hpf.  Details about the samples can be found in the supplementary file \"sample information.txt\"", null, "pubmed:37546736", null, "Perturbation experiment 1  6 hpf 14 hpf biological replicate 1  technical replicate 1", "GSM8327213", null, "source name:whole embryo|tissue:whole embryo|treatment:1percent DMSO control and cell cycle arrest at 6 hpf|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing", "Perturbation experiment 1  6 hpf 14 hpf biological replicate 1  technical replicate 1", "Multiple samples are pooled for each sequencing run. Raw FASTQ were prepared from Illumina bcl files in a format compatible with the inDrops.py pipeline. Each nextseq run results in 16 FASTQ files 4 lanes x 4 reads per lane. For some pooled libraries  sequencing was run twice to get more UMIs per cell and hence we have deposited 16x2 = 32 raw files for those sequencing samples. The illumina library indices of different samples in a run are provided in the meta data. These can be used to demultiplex the raw file into separate libraries. The read files from an inDrops run have the following content: * R1 001.fastq.gz : contains the three prime UTR cDNA read * R2 001.fastq.gz : contains the first half of the cell barcode * R3 001.fastq.gz : contains the library index for demultiplexing libraries * R4 001.fastq.gz : contains the second half of the barcode and the UMI.  All subsequent processing steps from FASTQ files to count matrixes were performed using the custom pipeline for inDrops data analysis github.com/indrops. Single cell transcriptomes were barcoded using inDrops Klein et al  Cell 2015. Standard transcriptome RNA seq libraries were processed as reported in Zilionis et al. Nature Protocol 2016 using inDrops v3 protocol. The transcriptome libraries were sequenced on reads Illumina NextSeq 500. Libraries used standard Illumina sequencing primers and 61 cycles for Read1  14 cycles for Read2  8 cycles each for IndexRead1 and IndexRead2. Raw fastq files was processed using inDrops.py pipeline github.com/indrops/indrops. Sequenced reads were mapped to a zebrafish reference transcriptome built from the zebrafish GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 using bowtie version 1.1.143. To obtain the final counts matrix used for data analysis  total count filters were applied as described in Kukreja et. al. 2024  method section \"Single cell RNA seq Data preprocessing\" Assembly: GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 Supplementary files format and content: Raw counts tsv.gz: cell barcode  gene names  and raw counts for all cells Supplementary files format and content: Metadata metadata.csv: library identity  cell barcode  and associated metadata for all cells   time point  treatment  replicate  annotated cell state  total number of counts  etc Library strategy: inDrops v3 scRNA seq", "whole embryo", "Zebrafish embryos were arrested for cell cycle using two complementary approaches. S phase cell cycle arrest was induced using a cocktail of drugs \u2013 hydroxyurea Sigma Aldrich H8627 5G at 20 mM and aphidicolin Sigma Aldrich A0781 5MG at 150 \u00b5M concentration in 1% dimethyl sulfoxide DMSO in egg water. G2/M phase arrest was induced by crossing heterozygous emi1 wt/mut zebrafish to generate homozygous emi1 mut/mut embryos  referred as hi2648 in the manuscript. Homozygous mutants with cell cycle arrest were screened at 24 hpf as they have very clear phenotype by this time \u2013 these embryos are smaller and have bent tails and the heterozygous mutants and wildtype are indistinguishable.", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", "AB wild type strains were used for all HUA perturbation experiments. Zebrafish mutant line hi2648  a mutant for the gene emi1  was kindly gifted by Dr. Jennifer Rhodes. Embryos were developed within the ambient temperature of Zebrafish development. Time of fertilization at 28.5 C was used to stage each clutch and this was confirmed using morphological features of the embryos. All zebrafish were housed in a facility overseen by the Harvard Medical Area Standing Committee on Animals our IACUC which performs regular inspections and under which we have an approved protocol for all animal procedures.", "tissue:whole embryo|treatment:1percent DMSO control and cell cycle arrest at 6 hpf", "GSM8327213", "GSM8327213: Perturbation experiment 1  6 hpf 14 hpf biological replicate 1  technical replicate 1; Danio rerio; OTHER", "GSM8327213 r1", "GSM8327213", "1", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", null, "OTHER", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "NextSeq 500", null, "SRP513754", null, null, "pert_exp1_brep1_trep1_S0_L003_R1_001_run2.fastq.gz pert_exp1_brep1_trep1_S0_L003_R2_001_run2.fastq.gz pert_exp1_brep1_trep1_S0_L003_R3_001_run2.fastq.gz pert_exp1_brep1_trep1_S0_L003_R4_001_run2.fastq.gz", "fastq fastq fastq fastq", 7347837315.0, 80745465.0, "GSM8327213 r7", "0:61 1:8 2:8 3:14", "A:1442258471;C:999458019;G:933530375;T:1550199068;N:27432", 61, 8, 8, 14, 1442258471, 999458019, 933530375, 1550199068, 27432, "SRX24912665", "SRS21618599", "SRA1898111", "Harvard University", "Harvard University", null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, "B", null, "usable mapping rate", "illumina", "nextseq", "unknown", "other", "trueseq", "sc", "single_cell_droplet", "indrops", null, "United States", "2024-06-13", "Multi-stage", "Embryo", "Whole Organism", "All anatomical structures"], [32754, "SRR29398893", "SRX24912665", "SRS21618599", "SRP513754", "PRJNA1123686", "Cell state transitions are decoupled from cell division during early embryo development [I]", "GSE269784", "Other", "As tissues develop  cells divide and differentiate concurrently. Conflicting evidence shows that cell division is either dispensable or required for formation of cell types. To determine the role of cell division in differentiation  we arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos using two independent approaches and profiled them at single cell resolution. We show that cell division is dispensable for differentiation of all embryonic tissues during initial cell type differentiation from early gastrulation to the end of segmentation. However  in the absence of cell division  differentiation slows down in some cell types  and cells exhibit global stress responses. While differentiation is robust to blocking cell division  the proportions of cells across cell states are not but show evidence of partial compensation. This work clarifies our understanding of the role of cell division in development and showcases the utility of combining embryo wide perturbations with single cell RNA sequencing to uncover the role of common biological processes across multiple tissues. Overall design: We arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos at 6 hpf using two independent approaches: a chemical approach hydroxyurea and aphidicolin  HUA and a genetic approach involving a loss of function mutation in the gene emi1 allele hi2648. We tracked differentiation dynamics using single cell RNA sequencing scRNA seq on embryos spanning 6\u201324 hpf for HUA treated and control embryos  and at 24 hpf for emi1 mutant embryos. Overall we have collected multiple replicates for control embryos ABs at 6  8  10  14  18  21 hpf and 24 hpf  for HUA treated at 8  10  14 hpf and 24 hpf and for emi1 mutants at 24 hpf.  Details about the samples can be found in the supplementary file \"sample information.txt\"", null, "pubmed:37546736", null, "Perturbation experiment 1  6 hpf 14 hpf biological replicate 1  technical replicate 1", "GSM8327213", null, "source name:whole embryo|tissue:whole embryo|treatment:1percent DMSO control and cell cycle arrest at 6 hpf|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing", "Perturbation experiment 1  6 hpf 14 hpf biological replicate 1  technical replicate 1", "Multiple samples are pooled for each sequencing run. Raw FASTQ were prepared from Illumina bcl files in a format compatible with the inDrops.py pipeline. Each nextseq run results in 16 FASTQ files 4 lanes x 4 reads per lane. For some pooled libraries  sequencing was run twice to get more UMIs per cell and hence we have deposited 16x2 = 32 raw files for those sequencing samples. The illumina library indices of different samples in a run are provided in the meta data. These can be used to demultiplex the raw file into separate libraries. The read files from an inDrops run have the following content: * R1 001.fastq.gz : contains the three prime UTR cDNA read * R2 001.fastq.gz : contains the first half of the cell barcode * R3 001.fastq.gz : contains the library index for demultiplexing libraries * R4 001.fastq.gz : contains the second half of the barcode and the UMI.  All subsequent processing steps from FASTQ files to count matrixes were performed using the custom pipeline for inDrops data analysis github.com/indrops. Single cell transcriptomes were barcoded using inDrops Klein et al  Cell 2015. Standard transcriptome RNA seq libraries were processed as reported in Zilionis et al. Nature Protocol 2016 using inDrops v3 protocol. The transcriptome libraries were sequenced on reads Illumina NextSeq 500. Libraries used standard Illumina sequencing primers and 61 cycles for Read1  14 cycles for Read2  8 cycles each for IndexRead1 and IndexRead2. Raw fastq files was processed using inDrops.py pipeline github.com/indrops/indrops. Sequenced reads were mapped to a zebrafish reference transcriptome built from the zebrafish GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 using bowtie version 1.1.143. To obtain the final counts matrix used for data analysis  total count filters were applied as described in Kukreja et. al. 2024  method section \"Single cell RNA seq Data preprocessing\" Assembly: GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 Supplementary files format and content: Raw counts tsv.gz: cell barcode  gene names  and raw counts for all cells Supplementary files format and content: Metadata metadata.csv: library identity  cell barcode  and associated metadata for all cells   time point  treatment  replicate  annotated cell state  total number of counts  etc Library strategy: inDrops v3 scRNA seq", "whole embryo", "Zebrafish embryos were arrested for cell cycle using two complementary approaches. S phase cell cycle arrest was induced using a cocktail of drugs \u2013 hydroxyurea Sigma Aldrich H8627 5G at 20 mM and aphidicolin Sigma Aldrich A0781 5MG at 150 \u00b5M concentration in 1% dimethyl sulfoxide DMSO in egg water. G2/M phase arrest was induced by crossing heterozygous emi1 wt/mut zebrafish to generate homozygous emi1 mut/mut embryos  referred as hi2648 in the manuscript. Homozygous mutants with cell cycle arrest were screened at 24 hpf as they have very clear phenotype by this time \u2013 these embryos are smaller and have bent tails and the heterozygous mutants and wildtype are indistinguishable.", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", "AB wild type strains were used for all HUA perturbation experiments. Zebrafish mutant line hi2648  a mutant for the gene emi1  was kindly gifted by Dr. Jennifer Rhodes. Embryos were developed within the ambient temperature of Zebrafish development. Time of fertilization at 28.5 C was used to stage each clutch and this was confirmed using morphological features of the embryos. All zebrafish were housed in a facility overseen by the Harvard Medical Area Standing Committee on Animals our IACUC which performs regular inspections and under which we have an approved protocol for all animal procedures.", "tissue:whole embryo|treatment:1percent DMSO control and cell cycle arrest at 6 hpf", "GSM8327213", "GSM8327213: Perturbation experiment 1  6 hpf 14 hpf biological replicate 1  technical replicate 1; Danio rerio; OTHER", "GSM8327213 r1", "GSM8327213", "1", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", null, "OTHER", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "NextSeq 500", null, "SRP513754", null, null, "pert_exp1_brep1_trep1_S0_L004_R1_001_run2.fastq.gz pert_exp1_brep1_trep1_S0_L004_R2_001_run2.fastq.gz pert_exp1_brep1_trep1_S0_L004_R3_001_run2.fastq.gz pert_exp1_brep1_trep1_S0_L004_R4_001_run2.fastq.gz", "fastq fastq fastq fastq", 7549030853.0, 82956383.0, "GSM8327213 r8", "0:61 1:8 2:8 3:14", "A:1483634179;C:1026783953;G:942155543;T:1607740711;N:24977", 61, 8, 8, 14, 1483634179, 1026783953, 942155543, 1607740711, 24977, "SRX24912665", "SRS21618599", "SRA1898111", "Harvard University", "Harvard University", null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, "B", null, "usable mapping rate", "illumina", "nextseq", "unknown", "other", "trueseq", "sc", "single_cell_droplet", "indrops", null, "United States", "2024-06-13", "Multi-stage", "Embryo", "Whole Organism", "All anatomical structures"], [32755, "SRR29398906", "SRX24912665", "SRS21618599", "SRP513754", "PRJNA1123686", "Cell state transitions are decoupled from cell division during early embryo development [I]", "GSE269784", "Other", "As tissues develop  cells divide and differentiate concurrently. Conflicting evidence shows that cell division is either dispensable or required for formation of cell types. To determine the role of cell division in differentiation  we arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos using two independent approaches and profiled them at single cell resolution. We show that cell division is dispensable for differentiation of all embryonic tissues during initial cell type differentiation from early gastrulation to the end of segmentation. However  in the absence of cell division  differentiation slows down in some cell types  and cells exhibit global stress responses. While differentiation is robust to blocking cell division  the proportions of cells across cell states are not but show evidence of partial compensation. This work clarifies our understanding of the role of cell division in development and showcases the utility of combining embryo wide perturbations with single cell RNA sequencing to uncover the role of common biological processes across multiple tissues. Overall design: We arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos at 6 hpf using two independent approaches: a chemical approach hydroxyurea and aphidicolin  HUA and a genetic approach involving a loss of function mutation in the gene emi1 allele hi2648. We tracked differentiation dynamics using single cell RNA sequencing scRNA seq on embryos spanning 6\u201324 hpf for HUA treated and control embryos  and at 24 hpf for emi1 mutant embryos. Overall we have collected multiple replicates for control embryos ABs at 6  8  10  14  18  21 hpf and 24 hpf  for HUA treated at 8  10  14 hpf and 24 hpf and for emi1 mutants at 24 hpf.  Details about the samples can be found in the supplementary file \"sample information.txt\"", null, "pubmed:37546736", null, "Perturbation experiment 1  6 hpf 14 hpf biological replicate 1  technical replicate 1", "GSM8327213", null, "source name:whole embryo|tissue:whole embryo|treatment:1percent DMSO control and cell cycle arrest at 6 hpf|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing", "Perturbation experiment 1  6 hpf 14 hpf biological replicate 1  technical replicate 1", "Multiple samples are pooled for each sequencing run. Raw FASTQ were prepared from Illumina bcl files in a format compatible with the inDrops.py pipeline. Each nextseq run results in 16 FASTQ files 4 lanes x 4 reads per lane. For some pooled libraries  sequencing was run twice to get more UMIs per cell and hence we have deposited 16x2 = 32 raw files for those sequencing samples. The illumina library indices of different samples in a run are provided in the meta data. These can be used to demultiplex the raw file into separate libraries. The read files from an inDrops run have the following content: * R1 001.fastq.gz : contains the three prime UTR cDNA read * R2 001.fastq.gz : contains the first half of the cell barcode * R3 001.fastq.gz : contains the library index for demultiplexing libraries * R4 001.fastq.gz : contains the second half of the barcode and the UMI.  All subsequent processing steps from FASTQ files to count matrixes were performed using the custom pipeline for inDrops data analysis github.com/indrops. Single cell transcriptomes were barcoded using inDrops Klein et al  Cell 2015. Standard transcriptome RNA seq libraries were processed as reported in Zilionis et al. Nature Protocol 2016 using inDrops v3 protocol. The transcriptome libraries were sequenced on reads Illumina NextSeq 500. Libraries used standard Illumina sequencing primers and 61 cycles for Read1  14 cycles for Read2  8 cycles each for IndexRead1 and IndexRead2. Raw fastq files was processed using inDrops.py pipeline github.com/indrops/indrops. Sequenced reads were mapped to a zebrafish reference transcriptome built from the zebrafish GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 using bowtie version 1.1.143. To obtain the final counts matrix used for data analysis  total count filters were applied as described in Kukreja et. al. 2024  method section \"Single cell RNA seq Data preprocessing\" Assembly: GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 Supplementary files format and content: Raw counts tsv.gz: cell barcode  gene names  and raw counts for all cells Supplementary files format and content: Metadata metadata.csv: library identity  cell barcode  and associated metadata for all cells   time point  treatment  replicate  annotated cell state  total number of counts  etc Library strategy: inDrops v3 scRNA seq", "whole embryo", "Zebrafish embryos were arrested for cell cycle using two complementary approaches. S phase cell cycle arrest was induced using a cocktail of drugs \u2013 hydroxyurea Sigma Aldrich H8627 5G at 20 mM and aphidicolin Sigma Aldrich A0781 5MG at 150 \u00b5M concentration in 1% dimethyl sulfoxide DMSO in egg water. G2/M phase arrest was induced by crossing heterozygous emi1 wt/mut zebrafish to generate homozygous emi1 mut/mut embryos  referred as hi2648 in the manuscript. Homozygous mutants with cell cycle arrest were screened at 24 hpf as they have very clear phenotype by this time \u2013 these embryos are smaller and have bent tails and the heterozygous mutants and wildtype are indistinguishable.", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", "AB wild type strains were used for all HUA perturbation experiments. Zebrafish mutant line hi2648  a mutant for the gene emi1  was kindly gifted by Dr. Jennifer Rhodes. Embryos were developed within the ambient temperature of Zebrafish development. Time of fertilization at 28.5 C was used to stage each clutch and this was confirmed using morphological features of the embryos. All zebrafish were housed in a facility overseen by the Harvard Medical Area Standing Committee on Animals our IACUC which performs regular inspections and under which we have an approved protocol for all animal procedures.", "tissue:whole embryo|treatment:1percent DMSO control and cell cycle arrest at 6 hpf", "GSM8327213", "GSM8327213: Perturbation experiment 1  6 hpf 14 hpf biological replicate 1  technical replicate 1; Danio rerio; OTHER", "GSM8327213 r1", "GSM8327213", "1", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", null, "OTHER", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "NextSeq 500", null, "SRP513754", null, null, "pert_exp1_brep1_trep1_S0_L004_R1_001_run1.fastq.gz pert_exp1_brep1_trep1_S0_L004_R2_001_run1.fastq.gz pert_exp1_brep1_trep1_S0_L004_R3_001_run1.fastq.gz pert_exp1_brep1_trep1_S0_L004_R4_001_run1.fastq.gz", "fastq fastq fastq fastq", 5617759875.0, 61733625.0, "GSM8327213 r4", "0:61 1:8 2:8 3:14", "A:1141997479;C:743305987;G:692463270;T:1187966465;N:17924", 61, 8, 8, 14, 1141997479, 743305987, 692463270, 1187966465, 17924, "SRX24912665", "SRS21618599", "SRA1898111", "Harvard University", "Harvard University", null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, "B", null, "usable mapping rate", "illumina", "nextseq", "unknown", "other", "trueseq", "sc", "single_cell_droplet", "indrops", null, "United States", "2024-06-13", "Multi-stage", "Embryo", "Whole Organism", "All anatomical structures"], [32756, "SRR29398907", "SRX24912665", "SRS21618599", "SRP513754", "PRJNA1123686", "Cell state transitions are decoupled from cell division during early embryo development [I]", "GSE269784", "Other", "As tissues develop  cells divide and differentiate concurrently. Conflicting evidence shows that cell division is either dispensable or required for formation of cell types. To determine the role of cell division in differentiation  we arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos using two independent approaches and profiled them at single cell resolution. We show that cell division is dispensable for differentiation of all embryonic tissues during initial cell type differentiation from early gastrulation to the end of segmentation. However  in the absence of cell division  differentiation slows down in some cell types  and cells exhibit global stress responses. While differentiation is robust to blocking cell division  the proportions of cells across cell states are not but show evidence of partial compensation. This work clarifies our understanding of the role of cell division in development and showcases the utility of combining embryo wide perturbations with single cell RNA sequencing to uncover the role of common biological processes across multiple tissues. Overall design: We arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos at 6 hpf using two independent approaches: a chemical approach hydroxyurea and aphidicolin  HUA and a genetic approach involving a loss of function mutation in the gene emi1 allele hi2648. We tracked differentiation dynamics using single cell RNA sequencing scRNA seq on embryos spanning 6\u201324 hpf for HUA treated and control embryos  and at 24 hpf for emi1 mutant embryos. Overall we have collected multiple replicates for control embryos ABs at 6  8  10  14  18  21 hpf and 24 hpf  for HUA treated at 8  10  14 hpf and 24 hpf and for emi1 mutants at 24 hpf.  Details about the samples can be found in the supplementary file \"sample information.txt\"", null, "pubmed:37546736", null, "Perturbation experiment 1  6 hpf 14 hpf biological replicate 1  technical replicate 1", "GSM8327213", null, "source name:whole embryo|tissue:whole embryo|treatment:1percent DMSO control and cell cycle arrest at 6 hpf|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing", "Perturbation experiment 1  6 hpf 14 hpf biological replicate 1  technical replicate 1", "Multiple samples are pooled for each sequencing run. Raw FASTQ were prepared from Illumina bcl files in a format compatible with the inDrops.py pipeline. Each nextseq run results in 16 FASTQ files 4 lanes x 4 reads per lane. For some pooled libraries  sequencing was run twice to get more UMIs per cell and hence we have deposited 16x2 = 32 raw files for those sequencing samples. The illumina library indices of different samples in a run are provided in the meta data. These can be used to demultiplex the raw file into separate libraries. The read files from an inDrops run have the following content: * R1 001.fastq.gz : contains the three prime UTR cDNA read * R2 001.fastq.gz : contains the first half of the cell barcode * R3 001.fastq.gz : contains the library index for demultiplexing libraries * R4 001.fastq.gz : contains the second half of the barcode and the UMI.  All subsequent processing steps from FASTQ files to count matrixes were performed using the custom pipeline for inDrops data analysis github.com/indrops. Single cell transcriptomes were barcoded using inDrops Klein et al  Cell 2015. Standard transcriptome RNA seq libraries were processed as reported in Zilionis et al. Nature Protocol 2016 using inDrops v3 protocol. The transcriptome libraries were sequenced on reads Illumina NextSeq 500. Libraries used standard Illumina sequencing primers and 61 cycles for Read1  14 cycles for Read2  8 cycles each for IndexRead1 and IndexRead2. Raw fastq files was processed using inDrops.py pipeline github.com/indrops/indrops. Sequenced reads were mapped to a zebrafish reference transcriptome built from the zebrafish GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 using bowtie version 1.1.143. To obtain the final counts matrix used for data analysis  total count filters were applied as described in Kukreja et. al. 2024  method section \"Single cell RNA seq Data preprocessing\" Assembly: GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 Supplementary files format and content: Raw counts tsv.gz: cell barcode  gene names  and raw counts for all cells Supplementary files format and content: Metadata metadata.csv: library identity  cell barcode  and associated metadata for all cells   time point  treatment  replicate  annotated cell state  total number of counts  etc Library strategy: inDrops v3 scRNA seq", "whole embryo", "Zebrafish embryos were arrested for cell cycle using two complementary approaches. S phase cell cycle arrest was induced using a cocktail of drugs \u2013 hydroxyurea Sigma Aldrich H8627 5G at 20 mM and aphidicolin Sigma Aldrich A0781 5MG at 150 \u00b5M concentration in 1% dimethyl sulfoxide DMSO in egg water. G2/M phase arrest was induced by crossing heterozygous emi1 wt/mut zebrafish to generate homozygous emi1 mut/mut embryos  referred as hi2648 in the manuscript. Homozygous mutants with cell cycle arrest were screened at 24 hpf as they have very clear phenotype by this time \u2013 these embryos are smaller and have bent tails and the heterozygous mutants and wildtype are indistinguishable.", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", "AB wild type strains were used for all HUA perturbation experiments. Zebrafish mutant line hi2648  a mutant for the gene emi1  was kindly gifted by Dr. Jennifer Rhodes. Embryos were developed within the ambient temperature of Zebrafish development. Time of fertilization at 28.5 C was used to stage each clutch and this was confirmed using morphological features of the embryos. All zebrafish were housed in a facility overseen by the Harvard Medical Area Standing Committee on Animals our IACUC which performs regular inspections and under which we have an approved protocol for all animal procedures.", "tissue:whole embryo|treatment:1percent DMSO control and cell cycle arrest at 6 hpf", "GSM8327213", "GSM8327213: Perturbation experiment 1  6 hpf 14 hpf biological replicate 1  technical replicate 1; Danio rerio; OTHER", "GSM8327213 r1", "GSM8327213", "1", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", null, "OTHER", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "NextSeq 500", null, "SRP513754", null, null, "pert_exp1_brep1_trep1_S0_L001_R1_001_run2.fastq.gz pert_exp1_brep1_trep1_S0_L001_R2_001_run2.fastq.gz pert_exp1_brep1_trep1_S0_L001_R3_001_run2.fastq.gz pert_exp1_brep1_trep1_S0_L001_R4_001_run2.fastq.gz", "fastq fastq fastq fastq", 7274157527.0, 79935797.0, "GSM8327213 r5", "0:61 1:8 2:8 3:14", "A:1431076165;C:991014006;G:919281150;T:1534687447;N:24849", 61, 8, 8, 14, 1431076165, 991014006, 919281150, 1534687447, 24849, "SRX24912665", "SRS21618599", "SRA1898111", "Harvard University", "Harvard University", null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, "B", null, "usable mapping rate", "illumina", "nextseq", "unknown", "other", "trueseq", "sc", "single_cell_droplet", "indrops", null, "United States", "2024-06-13", "Multi-stage", "Embryo", "Whole Organism", "All anatomical structures"], [32757, "SRR29398894", "SRX24912664", "SRS21618598", "SRP513754", "PRJNA1123686", "Cell state transitions are decoupled from cell division during early embryo development [I]", "GSE269784", "Other", "As tissues develop  cells divide and differentiate concurrently. Conflicting evidence shows that cell division is either dispensable or required for formation of cell types. To determine the role of cell division in differentiation  we arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos using two independent approaches and profiled them at single cell resolution. We show that cell division is dispensable for differentiation of all embryonic tissues during initial cell type differentiation from early gastrulation to the end of segmentation. However  in the absence of cell division  differentiation slows down in some cell types  and cells exhibit global stress responses. While differentiation is robust to blocking cell division  the proportions of cells across cell states are not but show evidence of partial compensation. This work clarifies our understanding of the role of cell division in development and showcases the utility of combining embryo wide perturbations with single cell RNA sequencing to uncover the role of common biological processes across multiple tissues. Overall design: We arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos at 6 hpf using two independent approaches: a chemical approach hydroxyurea and aphidicolin  HUA and a genetic approach involving a loss of function mutation in the gene emi1 allele hi2648. We tracked differentiation dynamics using single cell RNA sequencing scRNA seq on embryos spanning 6\u201324 hpf for HUA treated and control embryos  and at 24 hpf for emi1 mutant embryos. Overall we have collected multiple replicates for control embryos ABs at 6  8  10  14  18  21 hpf and 24 hpf  for HUA treated at 8  10  14 hpf and 24 hpf and for emi1 mutants at 24 hpf.  Details about the samples can be found in the supplementary file \"sample information.txt\"", null, "pubmed:37546736", null, "Perturbation experiment 1  6 hpf 24 hpf biological replicate 2  technical replicate 1", "GSM8327214", null, "source name:whole embryo|tissue:whole embryo|treatment:1percent DMSO control and cell cycle arrest at 6 hpf|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing", "Perturbation experiment 1  6 hpf 24 hpf biological replicate 2  technical replicate 1", "Multiple samples are pooled for each sequencing run. Raw FASTQ were prepared from Illumina bcl files in a format compatible with the inDrops.py pipeline. Each nextseq run results in 16 FASTQ files 4 lanes x 4 reads per lane. For some pooled libraries  sequencing was run twice to get more UMIs per cell and hence we have deposited 16x2 = 32 raw files for those sequencing samples. The illumina library indices of different samples in a run are provided in the meta data. These can be used to demultiplex the raw file into separate libraries. The read files from an inDrops run have the following content: * R1 001.fastq.gz : contains the three prime UTR cDNA read * R2 001.fastq.gz : contains the first half of the cell barcode * R3 001.fastq.gz : contains the library index for demultiplexing libraries * R4 001.fastq.gz : contains the second half of the barcode and the UMI.  All subsequent processing steps from FASTQ files to count matrixes were performed using the custom pipeline for inDrops data analysis github.com/indrops. Single cell transcriptomes were barcoded using inDrops Klein et al  Cell 2015. Standard transcriptome RNA seq libraries were processed as reported in Zilionis et al. Nature Protocol 2016 using inDrops v3 protocol. The transcriptome libraries were sequenced on reads Illumina NextSeq 500. Libraries used standard Illumina sequencing primers and 61 cycles for Read1  14 cycles for Read2  8 cycles each for IndexRead1 and IndexRead2. Raw fastq files was processed using inDrops.py pipeline github.com/indrops/indrops. Sequenced reads were mapped to a zebrafish reference transcriptome built from the zebrafish GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 using bowtie version 1.1.143. To obtain the final counts matrix used for data analysis  total count filters were applied as described in Kukreja et. al. 2024  method section \"Single cell RNA seq Data preprocessing\" Assembly: GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 Supplementary files format and content: Raw counts tsv.gz: cell barcode  gene names  and raw counts for all cells Supplementary files format and content: Metadata metadata.csv: library identity  cell barcode  and associated metadata for all cells   time point  treatment  replicate  annotated cell state  total number of counts  etc Library strategy: inDrops v3 scRNA seq", "whole embryo", "Zebrafish embryos were arrested for cell cycle using two complementary approaches. S phase cell cycle arrest was induced using a cocktail of drugs \u2013 hydroxyurea Sigma Aldrich H8627 5G at 20 mM and aphidicolin Sigma Aldrich A0781 5MG at 150 \u00b5M concentration in 1% dimethyl sulfoxide DMSO in egg water. G2/M phase arrest was induced by crossing heterozygous emi1 wt/mut zebrafish to generate homozygous emi1 mut/mut embryos  referred as hi2648 in the manuscript. Homozygous mutants with cell cycle arrest were screened at 24 hpf as they have very clear phenotype by this time \u2013 these embryos are smaller and have bent tails and the heterozygous mutants and wildtype are indistinguishable.", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", "AB wild type strains were used for all HUA perturbation experiments. Zebrafish mutant line hi2648  a mutant for the gene emi1  was kindly gifted by Dr. Jennifer Rhodes. Embryos were developed within the ambient temperature of Zebrafish development. Time of fertilization at 28.5 C was used to stage each clutch and this was confirmed using morphological features of the embryos. All zebrafish were housed in a facility overseen by the Harvard Medical Area Standing Committee on Animals our IACUC which performs regular inspections and under which we have an approved protocol for all animal procedures.", "tissue:whole embryo|treatment:1percent DMSO control and cell cycle arrest at 6 hpf", "GSM8327214", "GSM8327214: Perturbation experiment 1  6 hpf 24 hpf biological replicate 2  technical replicate 1; Danio rerio; OTHER", "GSM8327214 r1", "GSM8327214", "1", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", null, "OTHER", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "NextSeq 500", null, "SRP513754", null, null, "pert_exp1_brep2_trep1_S0_L001_R1_001_run1.fastq.gz pert_exp1_brep2_trep1_S0_L001_R2_001_run1.fastq.gz pert_exp1_brep2_trep1_S0_L001_R3_001_run1.fastq.gz pert_exp1_brep2_trep1_S0_L001_R4_001_run1.fastq.gz", "fastq fastq fastq fastq", 10423478247.0, 114543717.0, "GSM8327214 r1", "0:61 1:8 2:8 3:14", "A:2025794098;C:1533084111;G:1357456923;T:2070555537;N:276068", 61, 8, 8, 14, 2025794098, 1533084111, 1357456923, 2070555537, 276068, "SRX24912664", "SRS21618598", "SRA1898111", "Harvard University", "Harvard University", null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, "B", null, "usable mapping rate", "illumina", "nextseq", "unknown", "other", "trueseq", "sc", "single_cell_droplet", "indrops", null, "United States", "2024-06-13", "Multi-stage", "Embryo", "Whole Organism", "All anatomical structures"], [32758, "SRR29398895", "SRX24912664", "SRS21618598", "SRP513754", "PRJNA1123686", "Cell state transitions are decoupled from cell division during early embryo development [I]", "GSE269784", "Other", "As tissues develop  cells divide and differentiate concurrently. Conflicting evidence shows that cell division is either dispensable or required for formation of cell types. To determine the role of cell division in differentiation  we arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos using two independent approaches and profiled them at single cell resolution. We show that cell division is dispensable for differentiation of all embryonic tissues during initial cell type differentiation from early gastrulation to the end of segmentation. However  in the absence of cell division  differentiation slows down in some cell types  and cells exhibit global stress responses. While differentiation is robust to blocking cell division  the proportions of cells across cell states are not but show evidence of partial compensation. This work clarifies our understanding of the role of cell division in development and showcases the utility of combining embryo wide perturbations with single cell RNA sequencing to uncover the role of common biological processes across multiple tissues. Overall design: We arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos at 6 hpf using two independent approaches: a chemical approach hydroxyurea and aphidicolin  HUA and a genetic approach involving a loss of function mutation in the gene emi1 allele hi2648. We tracked differentiation dynamics using single cell RNA sequencing scRNA seq on embryos spanning 6\u201324 hpf for HUA treated and control embryos  and at 24 hpf for emi1 mutant embryos. Overall we have collected multiple replicates for control embryos ABs at 6  8  10  14  18  21 hpf and 24 hpf  for HUA treated at 8  10  14 hpf and 24 hpf and for emi1 mutants at 24 hpf.  Details about the samples can be found in the supplementary file \"sample information.txt\"", null, "pubmed:37546736", null, "Perturbation experiment 1  6 hpf 24 hpf biological replicate 2  technical replicate 1", "GSM8327214", null, "source name:whole embryo|tissue:whole embryo|treatment:1percent DMSO control and cell cycle arrest at 6 hpf|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing", "Perturbation experiment 1  6 hpf 24 hpf biological replicate 2  technical replicate 1", "Multiple samples are pooled for each sequencing run. Raw FASTQ were prepared from Illumina bcl files in a format compatible with the inDrops.py pipeline. Each nextseq run results in 16 FASTQ files 4 lanes x 4 reads per lane. For some pooled libraries  sequencing was run twice to get more UMIs per cell and hence we have deposited 16x2 = 32 raw files for those sequencing samples. The illumina library indices of different samples in a run are provided in the meta data. These can be used to demultiplex the raw file into separate libraries. The read files from an inDrops run have the following content: * R1 001.fastq.gz : contains the three prime UTR cDNA read * R2 001.fastq.gz : contains the first half of the cell barcode * R3 001.fastq.gz : contains the library index for demultiplexing libraries * R4 001.fastq.gz : contains the second half of the barcode and the UMI.  All subsequent processing steps from FASTQ files to count matrixes were performed using the custom pipeline for inDrops data analysis github.com/indrops. Single cell transcriptomes were barcoded using inDrops Klein et al  Cell 2015. Standard transcriptome RNA seq libraries were processed as reported in Zilionis et al. Nature Protocol 2016 using inDrops v3 protocol. The transcriptome libraries were sequenced on reads Illumina NextSeq 500. Libraries used standard Illumina sequencing primers and 61 cycles for Read1  14 cycles for Read2  8 cycles each for IndexRead1 and IndexRead2. Raw fastq files was processed using inDrops.py pipeline github.com/indrops/indrops. Sequenced reads were mapped to a zebrafish reference transcriptome built from the zebrafish GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 using bowtie version 1.1.143. To obtain the final counts matrix used for data analysis  total count filters were applied as described in Kukreja et. al. 2024  method section \"Single cell RNA seq Data preprocessing\" Assembly: GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 Supplementary files format and content: Raw counts tsv.gz: cell barcode  gene names  and raw counts for all cells Supplementary files format and content: Metadata metadata.csv: library identity  cell barcode  and associated metadata for all cells   time point  treatment  replicate  annotated cell state  total number of counts  etc Library strategy: inDrops v3 scRNA seq", "whole embryo", "Zebrafish embryos were arrested for cell cycle using two complementary approaches. S phase cell cycle arrest was induced using a cocktail of drugs \u2013 hydroxyurea Sigma Aldrich H8627 5G at 20 mM and aphidicolin Sigma Aldrich A0781 5MG at 150 \u00b5M concentration in 1% dimethyl sulfoxide DMSO in egg water. G2/M phase arrest was induced by crossing heterozygous emi1 wt/mut zebrafish to generate homozygous emi1 mut/mut embryos  referred as hi2648 in the manuscript. Homozygous mutants with cell cycle arrest were screened at 24 hpf as they have very clear phenotype by this time \u2013 these embryos are smaller and have bent tails and the heterozygous mutants and wildtype are indistinguishable.", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", "AB wild type strains were used for all HUA perturbation experiments. Zebrafish mutant line hi2648  a mutant for the gene emi1  was kindly gifted by Dr. Jennifer Rhodes. Embryos were developed within the ambient temperature of Zebrafish development. Time of fertilization at 28.5 C was used to stage each clutch and this was confirmed using morphological features of the embryos. All zebrafish were housed in a facility overseen by the Harvard Medical Area Standing Committee on Animals our IACUC which performs regular inspections and under which we have an approved protocol for all animal procedures.", "tissue:whole embryo|treatment:1percent DMSO control and cell cycle arrest at 6 hpf", "GSM8327214", "GSM8327214: Perturbation experiment 1  6 hpf 24 hpf biological replicate 2  technical replicate 1; Danio rerio; OTHER", "GSM8327214 r1", "GSM8327214", "1", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", null, "OTHER", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "NextSeq 500", null, "SRP513754", null, null, "pert_exp1_brep2_trep1_S0_L002_R1_001_run1.fastq.gz pert_exp1_brep2_trep1_S0_L002_R2_001_run1.fastq.gz pert_exp1_brep2_trep1_S0_L002_R3_001_run1.fastq.gz pert_exp1_brep2_trep1_S0_L002_R4_001_run1.fastq.gz", "fastq fastq fastq fastq", 10655252153.0, 117090683.0, "GSM8327214 r2", "0:61 1:8 2:8 3:14", "A:2076209515;C:1557182701;G:1384355121;T:2124543476;N:240850", 61, 8, 8, 14, 2076209515, 1557182701, 1384355121, 2124543476, 240850, "SRX24912664", "SRS21618598", "SRA1898111", "Harvard University", "Harvard University", null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, "B", null, "usable mapping rate", "illumina", "nextseq", "unknown", "other", "trueseq", "sc", "single_cell_droplet", "indrops", null, "United States", "2024-06-13", "Multi-stage", "Embryo", "Whole Organism", "All anatomical structures"], [32759, "SRR29398896", "SRX24912664", "SRS21618598", "SRP513754", "PRJNA1123686", "Cell state transitions are decoupled from cell division during early embryo development [I]", "GSE269784", "Other", "As tissues develop  cells divide and differentiate concurrently. Conflicting evidence shows that cell division is either dispensable or required for formation of cell types. To determine the role of cell division in differentiation  we arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos using two independent approaches and profiled them at single cell resolution. We show that cell division is dispensable for differentiation of all embryonic tissues during initial cell type differentiation from early gastrulation to the end of segmentation. However  in the absence of cell division  differentiation slows down in some cell types  and cells exhibit global stress responses. While differentiation is robust to blocking cell division  the proportions of cells across cell states are not but show evidence of partial compensation. This work clarifies our understanding of the role of cell division in development and showcases the utility of combining embryo wide perturbations with single cell RNA sequencing to uncover the role of common biological processes across multiple tissues. Overall design: We arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos at 6 hpf using two independent approaches: a chemical approach hydroxyurea and aphidicolin  HUA and a genetic approach involving a loss of function mutation in the gene emi1 allele hi2648. We tracked differentiation dynamics using single cell RNA sequencing scRNA seq on embryos spanning 6\u201324 hpf for HUA treated and control embryos  and at 24 hpf for emi1 mutant embryos. Overall we have collected multiple replicates for control embryos ABs at 6  8  10  14  18  21 hpf and 24 hpf  for HUA treated at 8  10  14 hpf and 24 hpf and for emi1 mutants at 24 hpf.  Details about the samples can be found in the supplementary file \"sample information.txt\"", null, "pubmed:37546736", null, "Perturbation experiment 1  6 hpf 24 hpf biological replicate 2  technical replicate 1", "GSM8327214", null, "source name:whole embryo|tissue:whole embryo|treatment:1percent DMSO control and cell cycle arrest at 6 hpf|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing", "Perturbation experiment 1  6 hpf 24 hpf biological replicate 2  technical replicate 1", "Multiple samples are pooled for each sequencing run. Raw FASTQ were prepared from Illumina bcl files in a format compatible with the inDrops.py pipeline. Each nextseq run results in 16 FASTQ files 4 lanes x 4 reads per lane. For some pooled libraries  sequencing was run twice to get more UMIs per cell and hence we have deposited 16x2 = 32 raw files for those sequencing samples. The illumina library indices of different samples in a run are provided in the meta data. These can be used to demultiplex the raw file into separate libraries. The read files from an inDrops run have the following content: * R1 001.fastq.gz : contains the three prime UTR cDNA read * R2 001.fastq.gz : contains the first half of the cell barcode * R3 001.fastq.gz : contains the library index for demultiplexing libraries * R4 001.fastq.gz : contains the second half of the barcode and the UMI.  All subsequent processing steps from FASTQ files to count matrixes were performed using the custom pipeline for inDrops data analysis github.com/indrops. Single cell transcriptomes were barcoded using inDrops Klein et al  Cell 2015. Standard transcriptome RNA seq libraries were processed as reported in Zilionis et al. Nature Protocol 2016 using inDrops v3 protocol. The transcriptome libraries were sequenced on reads Illumina NextSeq 500. Libraries used standard Illumina sequencing primers and 61 cycles for Read1  14 cycles for Read2  8 cycles each for IndexRead1 and IndexRead2. Raw fastq files was processed using inDrops.py pipeline github.com/indrops/indrops. Sequenced reads were mapped to a zebrafish reference transcriptome built from the zebrafish GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 using bowtie version 1.1.143. To obtain the final counts matrix used for data analysis  total count filters were applied as described in Kukreja et. al. 2024  method section \"Single cell RNA seq Data preprocessing\" Assembly: GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 Supplementary files format and content: Raw counts tsv.gz: cell barcode  gene names  and raw counts for all cells Supplementary files format and content: Metadata metadata.csv: library identity  cell barcode  and associated metadata for all cells   time point  treatment  replicate  annotated cell state  total number of counts  etc Library strategy: inDrops v3 scRNA seq", "whole embryo", "Zebrafish embryos were arrested for cell cycle using two complementary approaches. S phase cell cycle arrest was induced using a cocktail of drugs \u2013 hydroxyurea Sigma Aldrich H8627 5G at 20 mM and aphidicolin Sigma Aldrich A0781 5MG at 150 \u00b5M concentration in 1% dimethyl sulfoxide DMSO in egg water. G2/M phase arrest was induced by crossing heterozygous emi1 wt/mut zebrafish to generate homozygous emi1 mut/mut embryos  referred as hi2648 in the manuscript. Homozygous mutants with cell cycle arrest were screened at 24 hpf as they have very clear phenotype by this time \u2013 these embryos are smaller and have bent tails and the heterozygous mutants and wildtype are indistinguishable.", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", "AB wild type strains were used for all HUA perturbation experiments. Zebrafish mutant line hi2648  a mutant for the gene emi1  was kindly gifted by Dr. Jennifer Rhodes. Embryos were developed within the ambient temperature of Zebrafish development. Time of fertilization at 28.5 C was used to stage each clutch and this was confirmed using morphological features of the embryos. All zebrafish were housed in a facility overseen by the Harvard Medical Area Standing Committee on Animals our IACUC which performs regular inspections and under which we have an approved protocol for all animal procedures.", "tissue:whole embryo|treatment:1percent DMSO control and cell cycle arrest at 6 hpf", "GSM8327214", "GSM8327214: Perturbation experiment 1  6 hpf 24 hpf biological replicate 2  technical replicate 1; Danio rerio; OTHER", "GSM8327214 r1", "GSM8327214", "1", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", null, "OTHER", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "NextSeq 500", null, "SRP513754", null, null, "pert_exp1_brep2_trep1_S0_L003_R1_001_run1.fastq.gz pert_exp1_brep2_trep1_S0_L003_R2_001_run1.fastq.gz pert_exp1_brep2_trep1_S0_L003_R3_001_run1.fastq.gz pert_exp1_brep2_trep1_S0_L003_R4_001_run1.fastq.gz", "fastq fastq fastq fastq", 10684967475.0, 117417225.0, "GSM8327214 r3", "0:61 1:8 2:8 3:14", "A:2080492208;C:1561134821;G:1396957165;T:2123612525;N:254006", 61, 8, 8, 14, 2080492208, 1561134821, 1396957165, 2123612525, 254006, "SRX24912664", "SRS21618598", "SRA1898111", "Harvard University", "Harvard University", null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, "B", null, "usable mapping rate", "illumina", "nextseq", "unknown", "other", "trueseq", "sc", "single_cell_droplet", "indrops", null, "United States", "2024-06-13", "Multi-stage", "Embryo", "Whole Organism", "All anatomical structures"], [32760, "SRR29398897", "SRX24912664", "SRS21618598", "SRP513754", "PRJNA1123686", "Cell state transitions are decoupled from cell division during early embryo development [I]", "GSE269784", "Other", "As tissues develop  cells divide and differentiate concurrently. Conflicting evidence shows that cell division is either dispensable or required for formation of cell types. To determine the role of cell division in differentiation  we arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos using two independent approaches and profiled them at single cell resolution. We show that cell division is dispensable for differentiation of all embryonic tissues during initial cell type differentiation from early gastrulation to the end of segmentation. However  in the absence of cell division  differentiation slows down in some cell types  and cells exhibit global stress responses. While differentiation is robust to blocking cell division  the proportions of cells across cell states are not but show evidence of partial compensation. This work clarifies our understanding of the role of cell division in development and showcases the utility of combining embryo wide perturbations with single cell RNA sequencing to uncover the role of common biological processes across multiple tissues. Overall design: We arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos at 6 hpf using two independent approaches: a chemical approach hydroxyurea and aphidicolin  HUA and a genetic approach involving a loss of function mutation in the gene emi1 allele hi2648. We tracked differentiation dynamics using single cell RNA sequencing scRNA seq on embryos spanning 6\u201324 hpf for HUA treated and control embryos  and at 24 hpf for emi1 mutant embryos. Overall we have collected multiple replicates for control embryos ABs at 6  8  10  14  18  21 hpf and 24 hpf  for HUA treated at 8  10  14 hpf and 24 hpf and for emi1 mutants at 24 hpf.  Details about the samples can be found in the supplementary file \"sample information.txt\"", null, "pubmed:37546736", null, "Perturbation experiment 1  6 hpf 24 hpf biological replicate 2  technical replicate 1", "GSM8327214", null, "source name:whole embryo|tissue:whole embryo|treatment:1percent DMSO control and cell cycle arrest at 6 hpf|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing", "Perturbation experiment 1  6 hpf 24 hpf biological replicate 2  technical replicate 1", "Multiple samples are pooled for each sequencing run. Raw FASTQ were prepared from Illumina bcl files in a format compatible with the inDrops.py pipeline. Each nextseq run results in 16 FASTQ files 4 lanes x 4 reads per lane. For some pooled libraries  sequencing was run twice to get more UMIs per cell and hence we have deposited 16x2 = 32 raw files for those sequencing samples. The illumina library indices of different samples in a run are provided in the meta data. These can be used to demultiplex the raw file into separate libraries. The read files from an inDrops run have the following content: * R1 001.fastq.gz : contains the three prime UTR cDNA read * R2 001.fastq.gz : contains the first half of the cell barcode * R3 001.fastq.gz : contains the library index for demultiplexing libraries * R4 001.fastq.gz : contains the second half of the barcode and the UMI.  All subsequent processing steps from FASTQ files to count matrixes were performed using the custom pipeline for inDrops data analysis github.com/indrops. Single cell transcriptomes were barcoded using inDrops Klein et al  Cell 2015. Standard transcriptome RNA seq libraries were processed as reported in Zilionis et al. Nature Protocol 2016 using inDrops v3 protocol. The transcriptome libraries were sequenced on reads Illumina NextSeq 500. Libraries used standard Illumina sequencing primers and 61 cycles for Read1  14 cycles for Read2  8 cycles each for IndexRead1 and IndexRead2. Raw fastq files was processed using inDrops.py pipeline github.com/indrops/indrops. Sequenced reads were mapped to a zebrafish reference transcriptome built from the zebrafish GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 using bowtie version 1.1.143. To obtain the final counts matrix used for data analysis  total count filters were applied as described in Kukreja et. al. 2024  method section \"Single cell RNA seq Data preprocessing\" Assembly: GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 Supplementary files format and content: Raw counts tsv.gz: cell barcode  gene names  and raw counts for all cells Supplementary files format and content: Metadata metadata.csv: library identity  cell barcode  and associated metadata for all cells   time point  treatment  replicate  annotated cell state  total number of counts  etc Library strategy: inDrops v3 scRNA seq", "whole embryo", "Zebrafish embryos were arrested for cell cycle using two complementary approaches. S phase cell cycle arrest was induced using a cocktail of drugs \u2013 hydroxyurea Sigma Aldrich H8627 5G at 20 mM and aphidicolin Sigma Aldrich A0781 5MG at 150 \u00b5M concentration in 1% dimethyl sulfoxide DMSO in egg water. G2/M phase arrest was induced by crossing heterozygous emi1 wt/mut zebrafish to generate homozygous emi1 mut/mut embryos  referred as hi2648 in the manuscript. Homozygous mutants with cell cycle arrest were screened at 24 hpf as they have very clear phenotype by this time \u2013 these embryos are smaller and have bent tails and the heterozygous mutants and wildtype are indistinguishable.", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", "AB wild type strains were used for all HUA perturbation experiments. Zebrafish mutant line hi2648  a mutant for the gene emi1  was kindly gifted by Dr. Jennifer Rhodes. Embryos were developed within the ambient temperature of Zebrafish development. Time of fertilization at 28.5 C was used to stage each clutch and this was confirmed using morphological features of the embryos. All zebrafish were housed in a facility overseen by the Harvard Medical Area Standing Committee on Animals our IACUC which performs regular inspections and under which we have an approved protocol for all animal procedures.", "tissue:whole embryo|treatment:1percent DMSO control and cell cycle arrest at 6 hpf", "GSM8327214", "GSM8327214: Perturbation experiment 1  6 hpf 24 hpf biological replicate 2  technical replicate 1; Danio rerio; OTHER", "GSM8327214 r1", "GSM8327214", "1", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", null, "OTHER", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "NextSeq 500", null, "SRP513754", null, null, "pert_exp1_brep2_trep1_S0_L004_R1_001_run1.fastq.gz pert_exp1_brep2_trep1_S0_L004_R2_001_run1.fastq.gz pert_exp1_brep2_trep1_S0_L004_R3_001_run1.fastq.gz pert_exp1_brep2_trep1_S0_L004_R4_001_run1.fastq.gz", "fastq fastq fastq fastq", 10707189584.0, 117661424.0, "GSM8327214 r4", "0:61 1:8 2:8 3:14", "A:2083689453;C:1573371636;G:1391615902;T:2128351952;N:317921", 61, 8, 8, 14, 2083689453, 1573371636, 1391615902, 2128351952, 317921, "SRX24912664", "SRS21618598", "SRA1898111", "Harvard University", "Harvard University", null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, "B", null, "usable mapping rate", "illumina", "nextseq", "unknown", "other", "trueseq", "sc", "single_cell_droplet", "indrops", null, "United States", "2024-06-13", "Multi-stage", "Embryo", "Whole Organism", "All anatomical structures"], [32761, "SRR29398898", "SRX24912664", "SRS21618598", "SRP513754", "PRJNA1123686", "Cell state transitions are decoupled from cell division during early embryo development [I]", "GSE269784", "Other", "As tissues develop  cells divide and differentiate concurrently. Conflicting evidence shows that cell division is either dispensable or required for formation of cell types. To determine the role of cell division in differentiation  we arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos using two independent approaches and profiled them at single cell resolution. We show that cell division is dispensable for differentiation of all embryonic tissues during initial cell type differentiation from early gastrulation to the end of segmentation. However  in the absence of cell division  differentiation slows down in some cell types  and cells exhibit global stress responses. While differentiation is robust to blocking cell division  the proportions of cells across cell states are not but show evidence of partial compensation. This work clarifies our understanding of the role of cell division in development and showcases the utility of combining embryo wide perturbations with single cell RNA sequencing to uncover the role of common biological processes across multiple tissues. Overall design: We arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos at 6 hpf using two independent approaches: a chemical approach hydroxyurea and aphidicolin  HUA and a genetic approach involving a loss of function mutation in the gene emi1 allele hi2648. We tracked differentiation dynamics using single cell RNA sequencing scRNA seq on embryos spanning 6\u201324 hpf for HUA treated and control embryos  and at 24 hpf for emi1 mutant embryos. Overall we have collected multiple replicates for control embryos ABs at 6  8  10  14  18  21 hpf and 24 hpf  for HUA treated at 8  10  14 hpf and 24 hpf and for emi1 mutants at 24 hpf.  Details about the samples can be found in the supplementary file \"sample information.txt\"", null, "pubmed:37546736", null, "Perturbation experiment 1  6 hpf 24 hpf biological replicate 2  technical replicate 1", "GSM8327214", null, "source name:whole embryo|tissue:whole embryo|treatment:1percent DMSO control and cell cycle arrest at 6 hpf|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing", "Perturbation experiment 1  6 hpf 24 hpf biological replicate 2  technical replicate 1", "Multiple samples are pooled for each sequencing run. Raw FASTQ were prepared from Illumina bcl files in a format compatible with the inDrops.py pipeline. Each nextseq run results in 16 FASTQ files 4 lanes x 4 reads per lane. For some pooled libraries  sequencing was run twice to get more UMIs per cell and hence we have deposited 16x2 = 32 raw files for those sequencing samples. The illumina library indices of different samples in a run are provided in the meta data. These can be used to demultiplex the raw file into separate libraries. The read files from an inDrops run have the following content: * R1 001.fastq.gz : contains the three prime UTR cDNA read * R2 001.fastq.gz : contains the first half of the cell barcode * R3 001.fastq.gz : contains the library index for demultiplexing libraries * R4 001.fastq.gz : contains the second half of the barcode and the UMI.  All subsequent processing steps from FASTQ files to count matrixes were performed using the custom pipeline for inDrops data analysis github.com/indrops. Single cell transcriptomes were barcoded using inDrops Klein et al  Cell 2015. Standard transcriptome RNA seq libraries were processed as reported in Zilionis et al. Nature Protocol 2016 using inDrops v3 protocol. The transcriptome libraries were sequenced on reads Illumina NextSeq 500. Libraries used standard Illumina sequencing primers and 61 cycles for Read1  14 cycles for Read2  8 cycles each for IndexRead1 and IndexRead2. Raw fastq files was processed using inDrops.py pipeline github.com/indrops/indrops. Sequenced reads were mapped to a zebrafish reference transcriptome built from the zebrafish GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 using bowtie version 1.1.143. To obtain the final counts matrix used for data analysis  total count filters were applied as described in Kukreja et. al. 2024  method section \"Single cell RNA seq Data preprocessing\" Assembly: GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 Supplementary files format and content: Raw counts tsv.gz: cell barcode  gene names  and raw counts for all cells Supplementary files format and content: Metadata metadata.csv: library identity  cell barcode  and associated metadata for all cells   time point  treatment  replicate  annotated cell state  total number of counts  etc Library strategy: inDrops v3 scRNA seq", "whole embryo", "Zebrafish embryos were arrested for cell cycle using two complementary approaches. S phase cell cycle arrest was induced using a cocktail of drugs \u2013 hydroxyurea Sigma Aldrich H8627 5G at 20 mM and aphidicolin Sigma Aldrich A0781 5MG at 150 \u00b5M concentration in 1% dimethyl sulfoxide DMSO in egg water. G2/M phase arrest was induced by crossing heterozygous emi1 wt/mut zebrafish to generate homozygous emi1 mut/mut embryos  referred as hi2648 in the manuscript. Homozygous mutants with cell cycle arrest were screened at 24 hpf as they have very clear phenotype by this time \u2013 these embryos are smaller and have bent tails and the heterozygous mutants and wildtype are indistinguishable.", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", "AB wild type strains were used for all HUA perturbation experiments. Zebrafish mutant line hi2648  a mutant for the gene emi1  was kindly gifted by Dr. Jennifer Rhodes. Embryos were developed within the ambient temperature of Zebrafish development. Time of fertilization at 28.5 C was used to stage each clutch and this was confirmed using morphological features of the embryos. All zebrafish were housed in a facility overseen by the Harvard Medical Area Standing Committee on Animals our IACUC which performs regular inspections and under which we have an approved protocol for all animal procedures.", "tissue:whole embryo|treatment:1percent DMSO control and cell cycle arrest at 6 hpf", "GSM8327214", "GSM8327214: Perturbation experiment 1  6 hpf 24 hpf biological replicate 2  technical replicate 1; Danio rerio; OTHER", "GSM8327214 r1", "GSM8327214", "1", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", null, "OTHER", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "NextSeq 500", null, "SRP513754", null, null, "pert_exp1_brep2_trep1_S0_L001_R1_001_run2.fastq.gz pert_exp1_brep2_trep1_S0_L001_R2_001_run2.fastq.gz pert_exp1_brep2_trep1_S0_L001_R3_001_run2.fastq.gz pert_exp1_brep2_trep1_S0_L001_R4_001_run2.fastq.gz", "fastq fastq fastq fastq", 11030224205.0, 121211255.0, "GSM8327214 r5", "0:61 1:8 2:8 3:14", "A:2183422666;C:1601517274;G:1426241368;T:2178932541;N:3772706", 61, 8, 8, 14, 2183422666, 1601517274, 1426241368, 2178932541, 3772706, "SRX24912664", "SRS21618598", "SRA1898111", "Harvard University", "Harvard University", null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, "B", null, "usable mapping rate", "illumina", "nextseq", "unknown", "other", "trueseq", "sc", "single_cell_droplet", "indrops", null, "United States", "2024-06-13", "Multi-stage", "Embryo", "Whole Organism", "All anatomical structures"], [32762, "SRR29398899", "SRX24912664", "SRS21618598", "SRP513754", "PRJNA1123686", "Cell state transitions are decoupled from cell division during early embryo development [I]", "GSE269784", "Other", "As tissues develop  cells divide and differentiate concurrently. Conflicting evidence shows that cell division is either dispensable or required for formation of cell types. To determine the role of cell division in differentiation  we arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos using two independent approaches and profiled them at single cell resolution. We show that cell division is dispensable for differentiation of all embryonic tissues during initial cell type differentiation from early gastrulation to the end of segmentation. However  in the absence of cell division  differentiation slows down in some cell types  and cells exhibit global stress responses. While differentiation is robust to blocking cell division  the proportions of cells across cell states are not but show evidence of partial compensation. This work clarifies our understanding of the role of cell division in development and showcases the utility of combining embryo wide perturbations with single cell RNA sequencing to uncover the role of common biological processes across multiple tissues. Overall design: We arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos at 6 hpf using two independent approaches: a chemical approach hydroxyurea and aphidicolin  HUA and a genetic approach involving a loss of function mutation in the gene emi1 allele hi2648. We tracked differentiation dynamics using single cell RNA sequencing scRNA seq on embryos spanning 6\u201324 hpf for HUA treated and control embryos  and at 24 hpf for emi1 mutant embryos. Overall we have collected multiple replicates for control embryos ABs at 6  8  10  14  18  21 hpf and 24 hpf  for HUA treated at 8  10  14 hpf and 24 hpf and for emi1 mutants at 24 hpf.  Details about the samples can be found in the supplementary file \"sample information.txt\"", null, "pubmed:37546736", null, "Perturbation experiment 1  6 hpf 24 hpf biological replicate 2  technical replicate 1", "GSM8327214", null, "source name:whole embryo|tissue:whole embryo|treatment:1percent DMSO control and cell cycle arrest at 6 hpf|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing", "Perturbation experiment 1  6 hpf 24 hpf biological replicate 2  technical replicate 1", "Multiple samples are pooled for each sequencing run. Raw FASTQ were prepared from Illumina bcl files in a format compatible with the inDrops.py pipeline. Each nextseq run results in 16 FASTQ files 4 lanes x 4 reads per lane. For some pooled libraries  sequencing was run twice to get more UMIs per cell and hence we have deposited 16x2 = 32 raw files for those sequencing samples. The illumina library indices of different samples in a run are provided in the meta data. These can be used to demultiplex the raw file into separate libraries. The read files from an inDrops run have the following content: * R1 001.fastq.gz : contains the three prime UTR cDNA read * R2 001.fastq.gz : contains the first half of the cell barcode * R3 001.fastq.gz : contains the library index for demultiplexing libraries * R4 001.fastq.gz : contains the second half of the barcode and the UMI.  All subsequent processing steps from FASTQ files to count matrixes were performed using the custom pipeline for inDrops data analysis github.com/indrops. Single cell transcriptomes were barcoded using inDrops Klein et al  Cell 2015. Standard transcriptome RNA seq libraries were processed as reported in Zilionis et al. Nature Protocol 2016 using inDrops v3 protocol. The transcriptome libraries were sequenced on reads Illumina NextSeq 500. Libraries used standard Illumina sequencing primers and 61 cycles for Read1  14 cycles for Read2  8 cycles each for IndexRead1 and IndexRead2. Raw fastq files was processed using inDrops.py pipeline github.com/indrops/indrops. Sequenced reads were mapped to a zebrafish reference transcriptome built from the zebrafish GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 using bowtie version 1.1.143. To obtain the final counts matrix used for data analysis  total count filters were applied as described in Kukreja et. al. 2024  method section \"Single cell RNA seq Data preprocessing\" Assembly: GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 Supplementary files format and content: Raw counts tsv.gz: cell barcode  gene names  and raw counts for all cells Supplementary files format and content: Metadata metadata.csv: library identity  cell barcode  and associated metadata for all cells   time point  treatment  replicate  annotated cell state  total number of counts  etc Library strategy: inDrops v3 scRNA seq", "whole embryo", "Zebrafish embryos were arrested for cell cycle using two complementary approaches. S phase cell cycle arrest was induced using a cocktail of drugs \u2013 hydroxyurea Sigma Aldrich H8627 5G at 20 mM and aphidicolin Sigma Aldrich A0781 5MG at 150 \u00b5M concentration in 1% dimethyl sulfoxide DMSO in egg water. G2/M phase arrest was induced by crossing heterozygous emi1 wt/mut zebrafish to generate homozygous emi1 mut/mut embryos  referred as hi2648 in the manuscript. Homozygous mutants with cell cycle arrest were screened at 24 hpf as they have very clear phenotype by this time \u2013 these embryos are smaller and have bent tails and the heterozygous mutants and wildtype are indistinguishable.", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", "AB wild type strains were used for all HUA perturbation experiments. Zebrafish mutant line hi2648  a mutant for the gene emi1  was kindly gifted by Dr. Jennifer Rhodes. Embryos were developed within the ambient temperature of Zebrafish development. Time of fertilization at 28.5 C was used to stage each clutch and this was confirmed using morphological features of the embryos. All zebrafish were housed in a facility overseen by the Harvard Medical Area Standing Committee on Animals our IACUC which performs regular inspections and under which we have an approved protocol for all animal procedures.", "tissue:whole embryo|treatment:1percent DMSO control and cell cycle arrest at 6 hpf", "GSM8327214", "GSM8327214: Perturbation experiment 1  6 hpf 24 hpf biological replicate 2  technical replicate 1; Danio rerio; OTHER", "GSM8327214 r1", "GSM8327214", "1", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", null, "OTHER", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "NextSeq 500", null, "SRP513754", null, null, "pert_exp1_brep2_trep1_S0_L002_R1_001_run2.fastq.gz pert_exp1_brep2_trep1_S0_L002_R2_001_run2.fastq.gz pert_exp1_brep2_trep1_S0_L002_R3_001_run2.fastq.gz pert_exp1_brep2_trep1_S0_L002_R4_001_run2.fastq.gz", "fastq fastq fastq fastq", 11030253234.0, 121211574.0, "GSM8327214 r6", "0:61 1:8 2:8 3:14", "A:2188443587;C:1589039147;G:1426719226;T:2185985975;N:3718079", 61, 8, 8, 14, 2188443587, 1589039147, 1426719226, 2185985975, 3718079, "SRX24912664", "SRS21618598", "SRA1898111", "Harvard University", "Harvard University", null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, "B", null, "usable mapping rate", "illumina", "nextseq", "unknown", "other", "trueseq", "sc", "single_cell_droplet", "indrops", null, "United States", "2024-06-13", "Multi-stage", "Embryo", "Whole Organism", "All anatomical structures"], [32763, "SRR29398900", "SRX24912664", "SRS21618598", "SRP513754", "PRJNA1123686", "Cell state transitions are decoupled from cell division during early embryo development [I]", "GSE269784", "Other", "As tissues develop  cells divide and differentiate concurrently. Conflicting evidence shows that cell division is either dispensable or required for formation of cell types. To determine the role of cell division in differentiation  we arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos using two independent approaches and profiled them at single cell resolution. We show that cell division is dispensable for differentiation of all embryonic tissues during initial cell type differentiation from early gastrulation to the end of segmentation. However  in the absence of cell division  differentiation slows down in some cell types  and cells exhibit global stress responses. While differentiation is robust to blocking cell division  the proportions of cells across cell states are not but show evidence of partial compensation. This work clarifies our understanding of the role of cell division in development and showcases the utility of combining embryo wide perturbations with single cell RNA sequencing to uncover the role of common biological processes across multiple tissues. Overall design: We arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos at 6 hpf using two independent approaches: a chemical approach hydroxyurea and aphidicolin  HUA and a genetic approach involving a loss of function mutation in the gene emi1 allele hi2648. We tracked differentiation dynamics using single cell RNA sequencing scRNA seq on embryos spanning 6\u201324 hpf for HUA treated and control embryos  and at 24 hpf for emi1 mutant embryos. Overall we have collected multiple replicates for control embryos ABs at 6  8  10  14  18  21 hpf and 24 hpf  for HUA treated at 8  10  14 hpf and 24 hpf and for emi1 mutants at 24 hpf.  Details about the samples can be found in the supplementary file \"sample information.txt\"", null, "pubmed:37546736", null, "Perturbation experiment 1  6 hpf 24 hpf biological replicate 2  technical replicate 1", "GSM8327214", null, "source name:whole embryo|tissue:whole embryo|treatment:1percent DMSO control and cell cycle arrest at 6 hpf|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing", "Perturbation experiment 1  6 hpf 24 hpf biological replicate 2  technical replicate 1", "Multiple samples are pooled for each sequencing run. Raw FASTQ were prepared from Illumina bcl files in a format compatible with the inDrops.py pipeline. Each nextseq run results in 16 FASTQ files 4 lanes x 4 reads per lane. For some pooled libraries  sequencing was run twice to get more UMIs per cell and hence we have deposited 16x2 = 32 raw files for those sequencing samples. The illumina library indices of different samples in a run are provided in the meta data. These can be used to demultiplex the raw file into separate libraries. The read files from an inDrops run have the following content: * R1 001.fastq.gz : contains the three prime UTR cDNA read * R2 001.fastq.gz : contains the first half of the cell barcode * R3 001.fastq.gz : contains the library index for demultiplexing libraries * R4 001.fastq.gz : contains the second half of the barcode and the UMI.  All subsequent processing steps from FASTQ files to count matrixes were performed using the custom pipeline for inDrops data analysis github.com/indrops. Single cell transcriptomes were barcoded using inDrops Klein et al  Cell 2015. Standard transcriptome RNA seq libraries were processed as reported in Zilionis et al. Nature Protocol 2016 using inDrops v3 protocol. The transcriptome libraries were sequenced on reads Illumina NextSeq 500. Libraries used standard Illumina sequencing primers and 61 cycles for Read1  14 cycles for Read2  8 cycles each for IndexRead1 and IndexRead2. Raw fastq files was processed using inDrops.py pipeline github.com/indrops/indrops. Sequenced reads were mapped to a zebrafish reference transcriptome built from the zebrafish GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 using bowtie version 1.1.143. To obtain the final counts matrix used for data analysis  total count filters were applied as described in Kukreja et. al. 2024  method section \"Single cell RNA seq Data preprocessing\" Assembly: GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 Supplementary files format and content: Raw counts tsv.gz: cell barcode  gene names  and raw counts for all cells Supplementary files format and content: Metadata metadata.csv: library identity  cell barcode  and associated metadata for all cells   time point  treatment  replicate  annotated cell state  total number of counts  etc Library strategy: inDrops v3 scRNA seq", "whole embryo", "Zebrafish embryos were arrested for cell cycle using two complementary approaches. S phase cell cycle arrest was induced using a cocktail of drugs \u2013 hydroxyurea Sigma Aldrich H8627 5G at 20 mM and aphidicolin Sigma Aldrich A0781 5MG at 150 \u00b5M concentration in 1% dimethyl sulfoxide DMSO in egg water. G2/M phase arrest was induced by crossing heterozygous emi1 wt/mut zebrafish to generate homozygous emi1 mut/mut embryos  referred as hi2648 in the manuscript. Homozygous mutants with cell cycle arrest were screened at 24 hpf as they have very clear phenotype by this time \u2013 these embryos are smaller and have bent tails and the heterozygous mutants and wildtype are indistinguishable.", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", "AB wild type strains were used for all HUA perturbation experiments. Zebrafish mutant line hi2648  a mutant for the gene emi1  was kindly gifted by Dr. Jennifer Rhodes. Embryos were developed within the ambient temperature of Zebrafish development. Time of fertilization at 28.5 C was used to stage each clutch and this was confirmed using morphological features of the embryos. All zebrafish were housed in a facility overseen by the Harvard Medical Area Standing Committee on Animals our IACUC which performs regular inspections and under which we have an approved protocol for all animal procedures.", "tissue:whole embryo|treatment:1percent DMSO control and cell cycle arrest at 6 hpf", "GSM8327214", "GSM8327214: Perturbation experiment 1  6 hpf 24 hpf biological replicate 2  technical replicate 1; Danio rerio; OTHER", "GSM8327214 r1", "GSM8327214", "1", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", null, "OTHER", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "NextSeq 500", null, "SRP513754", null, null, "pert_exp1_brep2_trep1_S0_L003_R1_001_run2.fastq.gz pert_exp1_brep2_trep1_S0_L003_R2_001_run2.fastq.gz pert_exp1_brep2_trep1_S0_L003_R3_001_run2.fastq.gz pert_exp1_brep2_trep1_S0_L003_R4_001_run2.fastq.gz", "fastq fastq fastq fastq", 11084660405.0, 121809455.0, "GSM8327214 r7", "0:61 1:8 2:8 3:14", "A:2203007980;C:1596382135;G:1428403216;T:2199749125;N:2834299", 61, 8, 8, 14, 2203007980, 1596382135, 1428403216, 2199749125, 2834299, "SRX24912664", "SRS21618598", "SRA1898111", "Harvard University", "Harvard University", null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, "B", null, "usable mapping rate", "illumina", "nextseq", "unknown", "other", "trueseq", "sc", "single_cell_droplet", "indrops", null, "United States", "2024-06-13", "Multi-stage", "Embryo", "Whole Organism", "All anatomical structures"], [32764, "SRR29398901", "SRX24912664", "SRS21618598", "SRP513754", "PRJNA1123686", "Cell state transitions are decoupled from cell division during early embryo development [I]", "GSE269784", "Other", "As tissues develop  cells divide and differentiate concurrently. Conflicting evidence shows that cell division is either dispensable or required for formation of cell types. To determine the role of cell division in differentiation  we arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos using two independent approaches and profiled them at single cell resolution. We show that cell division is dispensable for differentiation of all embryonic tissues during initial cell type differentiation from early gastrulation to the end of segmentation. However  in the absence of cell division  differentiation slows down in some cell types  and cells exhibit global stress responses. While differentiation is robust to blocking cell division  the proportions of cells across cell states are not but show evidence of partial compensation. This work clarifies our understanding of the role of cell division in development and showcases the utility of combining embryo wide perturbations with single cell RNA sequencing to uncover the role of common biological processes across multiple tissues. Overall design: We arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos at 6 hpf using two independent approaches: a chemical approach hydroxyurea and aphidicolin  HUA and a genetic approach involving a loss of function mutation in the gene emi1 allele hi2648. We tracked differentiation dynamics using single cell RNA sequencing scRNA seq on embryos spanning 6\u201324 hpf for HUA treated and control embryos  and at 24 hpf for emi1 mutant embryos. Overall we have collected multiple replicates for control embryos ABs at 6  8  10  14  18  21 hpf and 24 hpf  for HUA treated at 8  10  14 hpf and 24 hpf and for emi1 mutants at 24 hpf.  Details about the samples can be found in the supplementary file \"sample information.txt\"", null, "pubmed:37546736", null, "Perturbation experiment 1  6 hpf 24 hpf biological replicate 2  technical replicate 1", "GSM8327214", null, "source name:whole embryo|tissue:whole embryo|treatment:1percent DMSO control and cell cycle arrest at 6 hpf|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing", "Perturbation experiment 1  6 hpf 24 hpf biological replicate 2  technical replicate 1", "Multiple samples are pooled for each sequencing run. Raw FASTQ were prepared from Illumina bcl files in a format compatible with the inDrops.py pipeline. Each nextseq run results in 16 FASTQ files 4 lanes x 4 reads per lane. For some pooled libraries  sequencing was run twice to get more UMIs per cell and hence we have deposited 16x2 = 32 raw files for those sequencing samples. The illumina library indices of different samples in a run are provided in the meta data. These can be used to demultiplex the raw file into separate libraries. The read files from an inDrops run have the following content: * R1 001.fastq.gz : contains the three prime UTR cDNA read * R2 001.fastq.gz : contains the first half of the cell barcode * R3 001.fastq.gz : contains the library index for demultiplexing libraries * R4 001.fastq.gz : contains the second half of the barcode and the UMI.  All subsequent processing steps from FASTQ files to count matrixes were performed using the custom pipeline for inDrops data analysis github.com/indrops. Single cell transcriptomes were barcoded using inDrops Klein et al  Cell 2015. Standard transcriptome RNA seq libraries were processed as reported in Zilionis et al. Nature Protocol 2016 using inDrops v3 protocol. The transcriptome libraries were sequenced on reads Illumina NextSeq 500. Libraries used standard Illumina sequencing primers and 61 cycles for Read1  14 cycles for Read2  8 cycles each for IndexRead1 and IndexRead2. Raw fastq files was processed using inDrops.py pipeline github.com/indrops/indrops. Sequenced reads were mapped to a zebrafish reference transcriptome built from the zebrafish GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 using bowtie version 1.1.143. To obtain the final counts matrix used for data analysis  total count filters were applied as described in Kukreja et. al. 2024  method section \"Single cell RNA seq Data preprocessing\" Assembly: GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 Supplementary files format and content: Raw counts tsv.gz: cell barcode  gene names  and raw counts for all cells Supplementary files format and content: Metadata metadata.csv: library identity  cell barcode  and associated metadata for all cells   time point  treatment  replicate  annotated cell state  total number of counts  etc Library strategy: inDrops v3 scRNA seq", "whole embryo", "Zebrafish embryos were arrested for cell cycle using two complementary approaches. S phase cell cycle arrest was induced using a cocktail of drugs \u2013 hydroxyurea Sigma Aldrich H8627 5G at 20 mM and aphidicolin Sigma Aldrich A0781 5MG at 150 \u00b5M concentration in 1% dimethyl sulfoxide DMSO in egg water. G2/M phase arrest was induced by crossing heterozygous emi1 wt/mut zebrafish to generate homozygous emi1 mut/mut embryos  referred as hi2648 in the manuscript. Homozygous mutants with cell cycle arrest were screened at 24 hpf as they have very clear phenotype by this time \u2013 these embryos are smaller and have bent tails and the heterozygous mutants and wildtype are indistinguishable.", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", "AB wild type strains were used for all HUA perturbation experiments. Zebrafish mutant line hi2648  a mutant for the gene emi1  was kindly gifted by Dr. Jennifer Rhodes. Embryos were developed within the ambient temperature of Zebrafish development. Time of fertilization at 28.5 C was used to stage each clutch and this was confirmed using morphological features of the embryos. All zebrafish were housed in a facility overseen by the Harvard Medical Area Standing Committee on Animals our IACUC which performs regular inspections and under which we have an approved protocol for all animal procedures.", "tissue:whole embryo|treatment:1percent DMSO control and cell cycle arrest at 6 hpf", "GSM8327214", "GSM8327214: Perturbation experiment 1  6 hpf 24 hpf biological replicate 2  technical replicate 1; Danio rerio; OTHER", "GSM8327214 r1", "GSM8327214", "1", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", null, "OTHER", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "NextSeq 500", null, "SRP513754", null, null, "pert_exp1_brep2_trep1_S0_L004_R1_001_run2.fastq.gz pert_exp1_brep2_trep1_S0_L004_R2_001_run2.fastq.gz pert_exp1_brep2_trep1_S0_L004_R3_001_run2.fastq.gz pert_exp1_brep2_trep1_S0_L004_R4_001_run2.fastq.gz", "fastq fastq fastq fastq", 11063671801.0, 121578811.0, "GSM8327214 r8", "0:61 1:8 2:8 3:14", "A:2194629946;C:1601965741;G:1426892122;T:2190032980;N:2786682", 61, 8, 8, 14, 2194629946, 1601965741, 1426892122, 2190032980, 2786682, "SRX24912664", "SRS21618598", "SRA1898111", "Harvard University", "Harvard University", null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, "B", null, "usable mapping rate", "illumina", "nextseq", "unknown", "other", "trueseq", "sc", "single_cell_droplet", "indrops", null, "United States", "2024-06-13", "Multi-stage", "Embryo", "Whole Organism", "All anatomical structures"], [32765, "SRR29398902", "SRX24912663", "SRS21618597", "SRP513754", "PRJNA1123686", "Cell state transitions are decoupled from cell division during early embryo development [I]", "GSE269784", "Other", "As tissues develop  cells divide and differentiate concurrently. Conflicting evidence shows that cell division is either dispensable or required for formation of cell types. To determine the role of cell division in differentiation  we arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos using two independent approaches and profiled them at single cell resolution. We show that cell division is dispensable for differentiation of all embryonic tissues during initial cell type differentiation from early gastrulation to the end of segmentation. However  in the absence of cell division  differentiation slows down in some cell types  and cells exhibit global stress responses. While differentiation is robust to blocking cell division  the proportions of cells across cell states are not but show evidence of partial compensation. This work clarifies our understanding of the role of cell division in development and showcases the utility of combining embryo wide perturbations with single cell RNA sequencing to uncover the role of common biological processes across multiple tissues. Overall design: We arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos at 6 hpf using two independent approaches: a chemical approach hydroxyurea and aphidicolin  HUA and a genetic approach involving a loss of function mutation in the gene emi1 allele hi2648. We tracked differentiation dynamics using single cell RNA sequencing scRNA seq on embryos spanning 6\u201324 hpf for HUA treated and control embryos  and at 24 hpf for emi1 mutant embryos. Overall we have collected multiple replicates for control embryos ABs at 6  8  10  14  18  21 hpf and 24 hpf  for HUA treated at 8  10  14 hpf and 24 hpf and for emi1 mutants at 24 hpf.  Details about the samples can be found in the supplementary file \"sample information.txt\"", null, "pubmed:37546736", null, "Reference experiment  14 hpf 24 hpf biological replicate 2 and 3  technical replicate 2", "GSM8327212", null, "source name:whole embryo|tissue:whole embryo|treatment:1percent DMSO control and cell cycle arrest at 14 hpf|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing", "Reference experiment  14 hpf 24 hpf biological replicate 2 and 3  technical replicate 2", "Multiple samples are pooled for each sequencing run. Raw FASTQ were prepared from Illumina bcl files in a format compatible with the inDrops.py pipeline. Each nextseq run results in 16 FASTQ files 4 lanes x 4 reads per lane. For some pooled libraries  sequencing was run twice to get more UMIs per cell and hence we have deposited 16x2 = 32 raw files for those sequencing samples. The illumina library indices of different samples in a run are provided in the meta data. These can be used to demultiplex the raw file into separate libraries. The read files from an inDrops run have the following content: * R1 001.fastq.gz : contains the three prime UTR cDNA read * R2 001.fastq.gz : contains the first half of the cell barcode * R3 001.fastq.gz : contains the library index for demultiplexing libraries * R4 001.fastq.gz : contains the second half of the barcode and the UMI.  All subsequent processing steps from FASTQ files to count matrixes were performed using the custom pipeline for inDrops data analysis github.com/indrops. Single cell transcriptomes were barcoded using inDrops Klein et al  Cell 2015. Standard transcriptome RNA seq libraries were processed as reported in Zilionis et al. Nature Protocol 2016 using inDrops v3 protocol. The transcriptome libraries were sequenced on reads Illumina NextSeq 500. Libraries used standard Illumina sequencing primers and 61 cycles for Read1  14 cycles for Read2  8 cycles each for IndexRead1 and IndexRead2. Raw fastq files was processed using inDrops.py pipeline github.com/indrops/indrops. Sequenced reads were mapped to a zebrafish reference transcriptome built from the zebrafish GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 using bowtie version 1.1.143. To obtain the final counts matrix used for data analysis  total count filters were applied as described in Kukreja et. al. 2024  method section \"Single cell RNA seq Data preprocessing\" Assembly: GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 Supplementary files format and content: Raw counts tsv.gz: cell barcode  gene names  and raw counts for all cells Supplementary files format and content: Metadata metadata.csv: library identity  cell barcode  and associated metadata for all cells   time point  treatment  replicate  annotated cell state  total number of counts  etc Library strategy: inDrops v3 scRNA seq", "whole embryo", "Zebrafish embryos were arrested for cell cycle using two complementary approaches. S phase cell cycle arrest was induced using a cocktail of drugs \u2013 hydroxyurea Sigma Aldrich H8627 5G at 20 mM and aphidicolin Sigma Aldrich A0781 5MG at 150 \u00b5M concentration in 1% dimethyl sulfoxide DMSO in egg water. G2/M phase arrest was induced by crossing heterozygous emi1 wt/mut zebrafish to generate homozygous emi1 mut/mut embryos  referred as hi2648 in the manuscript. Homozygous mutants with cell cycle arrest were screened at 24 hpf as they have very clear phenotype by this time \u2013 these embryos are smaller and have bent tails and the heterozygous mutants and wildtype are indistinguishable.", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", "AB wild type strains were used for all HUA perturbation experiments. Zebrafish mutant line hi2648  a mutant for the gene emi1  was kindly gifted by Dr. Jennifer Rhodes. Embryos were developed within the ambient temperature of Zebrafish development. Time of fertilization at 28.5 C was used to stage each clutch and this was confirmed using morphological features of the embryos. All zebrafish were housed in a facility overseen by the Harvard Medical Area Standing Committee on Animals our IACUC which performs regular inspections and under which we have an approved protocol for all animal procedures.", "tissue:whole embryo|treatment:1percent DMSO control and cell cycle arrest at 14 hpf", "GSM8327212", "GSM8327212: Reference experiment  14 hpf 24 hpf biological replicate 2 and 3  technical replicate 2; Danio rerio; OTHER", "GSM8327212 r1", "GSM8327212", "1", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", null, "OTHER", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "NextSeq 500", null, "SRP513754", null, null, "ref_exp_brep2_3_trep2_S0_L001_R1_001.fastq.gz ref_exp_brep2_3_trep2_S0_L001_R2_001.fastq.gz ref_exp_brep2_3_trep2_S0_L001_R3_001.fastq.gz ref_exp_brep2_3_trep2_S0_L001_R4_001.fastq.gz", "fastq fastq fastq fastq", 12384624343.0, 136094773.0, "GSM8327212 r1", "0:61 1:8 2:8 3:14", "A:2294297792;C:1657100436;G:1635865148;T:2714342859;N:174918", 61, 8, 8, 14, 2294297792, 1657100436, 1635865148, 2714342859, 174918, "SRX24912663", "SRS21618597", "SRA1898111", "Harvard University", "Harvard University", null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, "B", null, "usable mapping rate", "illumina", "nextseq", "unknown", "other", "trueseq", "sc", "single_cell_droplet", "indrops", null, "United States", "2024-06-13", "Multi-stage", "Embryo", "Whole Organism", "All anatomical structures"], [32766, "SRR29398903", "SRX24912663", "SRS21618597", "SRP513754", "PRJNA1123686", "Cell state transitions are decoupled from cell division during early embryo development [I]", "GSE269784", "Other", "As tissues develop  cells divide and differentiate concurrently. Conflicting evidence shows that cell division is either dispensable or required for formation of cell types. To determine the role of cell division in differentiation  we arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos using two independent approaches and profiled them at single cell resolution. We show that cell division is dispensable for differentiation of all embryonic tissues during initial cell type differentiation from early gastrulation to the end of segmentation. However  in the absence of cell division  differentiation slows down in some cell types  and cells exhibit global stress responses. While differentiation is robust to blocking cell division  the proportions of cells across cell states are not but show evidence of partial compensation. This work clarifies our understanding of the role of cell division in development and showcases the utility of combining embryo wide perturbations with single cell RNA sequencing to uncover the role of common biological processes across multiple tissues. Overall design: We arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos at 6 hpf using two independent approaches: a chemical approach hydroxyurea and aphidicolin  HUA and a genetic approach involving a loss of function mutation in the gene emi1 allele hi2648. We tracked differentiation dynamics using single cell RNA sequencing scRNA seq on embryos spanning 6\u201324 hpf for HUA treated and control embryos  and at 24 hpf for emi1 mutant embryos. Overall we have collected multiple replicates for control embryos ABs at 6  8  10  14  18  21 hpf and 24 hpf  for HUA treated at 8  10  14 hpf and 24 hpf and for emi1 mutants at 24 hpf.  Details about the samples can be found in the supplementary file \"sample information.txt\"", null, "pubmed:37546736", null, "Reference experiment  14 hpf 24 hpf biological replicate 2 and 3  technical replicate 2", "GSM8327212", null, "source name:whole embryo|tissue:whole embryo|treatment:1percent DMSO control and cell cycle arrest at 14 hpf|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing", "Reference experiment  14 hpf 24 hpf biological replicate 2 and 3  technical replicate 2", "Multiple samples are pooled for each sequencing run. Raw FASTQ were prepared from Illumina bcl files in a format compatible with the inDrops.py pipeline. Each nextseq run results in 16 FASTQ files 4 lanes x 4 reads per lane. For some pooled libraries  sequencing was run twice to get more UMIs per cell and hence we have deposited 16x2 = 32 raw files for those sequencing samples. The illumina library indices of different samples in a run are provided in the meta data. These can be used to demultiplex the raw file into separate libraries. The read files from an inDrops run have the following content: * R1 001.fastq.gz : contains the three prime UTR cDNA read * R2 001.fastq.gz : contains the first half of the cell barcode * R3 001.fastq.gz : contains the library index for demultiplexing libraries * R4 001.fastq.gz : contains the second half of the barcode and the UMI.  All subsequent processing steps from FASTQ files to count matrixes were performed using the custom pipeline for inDrops data analysis github.com/indrops. Single cell transcriptomes were barcoded using inDrops Klein et al  Cell 2015. Standard transcriptome RNA seq libraries were processed as reported in Zilionis et al. Nature Protocol 2016 using inDrops v3 protocol. The transcriptome libraries were sequenced on reads Illumina NextSeq 500. Libraries used standard Illumina sequencing primers and 61 cycles for Read1  14 cycles for Read2  8 cycles each for IndexRead1 and IndexRead2. Raw fastq files was processed using inDrops.py pipeline github.com/indrops/indrops. Sequenced reads were mapped to a zebrafish reference transcriptome built from the zebrafish GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 using bowtie version 1.1.143. To obtain the final counts matrix used for data analysis  total count filters were applied as described in Kukreja et. al. 2024  method section \"Single cell RNA seq Data preprocessing\" Assembly: GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 Supplementary files format and content: Raw counts tsv.gz: cell barcode  gene names  and raw counts for all cells Supplementary files format and content: Metadata metadata.csv: library identity  cell barcode  and associated metadata for all cells   time point  treatment  replicate  annotated cell state  total number of counts  etc Library strategy: inDrops v3 scRNA seq", "whole embryo", "Zebrafish embryos were arrested for cell cycle using two complementary approaches. S phase cell cycle arrest was induced using a cocktail of drugs \u2013 hydroxyurea Sigma Aldrich H8627 5G at 20 mM and aphidicolin Sigma Aldrich A0781 5MG at 150 \u00b5M concentration in 1% dimethyl sulfoxide DMSO in egg water. G2/M phase arrest was induced by crossing heterozygous emi1 wt/mut zebrafish to generate homozygous emi1 mut/mut embryos  referred as hi2648 in the manuscript. Homozygous mutants with cell cycle arrest were screened at 24 hpf as they have very clear phenotype by this time \u2013 these embryos are smaller and have bent tails and the heterozygous mutants and wildtype are indistinguishable.", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", "AB wild type strains were used for all HUA perturbation experiments. Zebrafish mutant line hi2648  a mutant for the gene emi1  was kindly gifted by Dr. Jennifer Rhodes. Embryos were developed within the ambient temperature of Zebrafish development. Time of fertilization at 28.5 C was used to stage each clutch and this was confirmed using morphological features of the embryos. All zebrafish were housed in a facility overseen by the Harvard Medical Area Standing Committee on Animals our IACUC which performs regular inspections and under which we have an approved protocol for all animal procedures.", "tissue:whole embryo|treatment:1percent DMSO control and cell cycle arrest at 14 hpf", "GSM8327212", "GSM8327212: Reference experiment  14 hpf 24 hpf biological replicate 2 and 3  technical replicate 2; Danio rerio; OTHER", "GSM8327212 r1", "GSM8327212", "1", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", null, "OTHER", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "NextSeq 500", null, "SRP513754", null, null, "ref_exp_brep2_3_trep2_S0_L002_R1_001.fastq.gz ref_exp_brep2_3_trep2_S0_L002_R2_001.fastq.gz ref_exp_brep2_3_trep2_S0_L002_R3_001.fastq.gz ref_exp_brep2_3_trep2_S0_L002_R4_001.fastq.gz", "fastq fastq fastq fastq", 12315448600.0, 135334600.0, "GSM8327212 r2", "0:61 1:8 2:8 3:14", "A:2283746259;C:1642777354;G:1624372665;T:2704362532;N:151790", 61, 8, 8, 14, 2283746259, 1642777354, 1624372665, 2704362532, 151790, "SRX24912663", "SRS21618597", "SRA1898111", "Harvard University", "Harvard University", null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, "B", null, "usable mapping rate", "illumina", "nextseq", "unknown", "other", "trueseq", "sc", "single_cell_droplet", "indrops", null, "United States", "2024-06-13", "Multi-stage", "Embryo", "Whole Organism", "All anatomical structures"], [32767, "SRR29398904", "SRX24912663", "SRS21618597", "SRP513754", "PRJNA1123686", "Cell state transitions are decoupled from cell division during early embryo development [I]", "GSE269784", "Other", "As tissues develop  cells divide and differentiate concurrently. Conflicting evidence shows that cell division is either dispensable or required for formation of cell types. To determine the role of cell division in differentiation  we arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos using two independent approaches and profiled them at single cell resolution. We show that cell division is dispensable for differentiation of all embryonic tissues during initial cell type differentiation from early gastrulation to the end of segmentation. However  in the absence of cell division  differentiation slows down in some cell types  and cells exhibit global stress responses. While differentiation is robust to blocking cell division  the proportions of cells across cell states are not but show evidence of partial compensation. This work clarifies our understanding of the role of cell division in development and showcases the utility of combining embryo wide perturbations with single cell RNA sequencing to uncover the role of common biological processes across multiple tissues. Overall design: We arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos at 6 hpf using two independent approaches: a chemical approach hydroxyurea and aphidicolin  HUA and a genetic approach involving a loss of function mutation in the gene emi1 allele hi2648. We tracked differentiation dynamics using single cell RNA sequencing scRNA seq on embryos spanning 6\u201324 hpf for HUA treated and control embryos  and at 24 hpf for emi1 mutant embryos. Overall we have collected multiple replicates for control embryos ABs at 6  8  10  14  18  21 hpf and 24 hpf  for HUA treated at 8  10  14 hpf and 24 hpf and for emi1 mutants at 24 hpf.  Details about the samples can be found in the supplementary file \"sample information.txt\"", null, "pubmed:37546736", null, "Reference experiment  14 hpf 24 hpf biological replicate 2 and 3  technical replicate 2", "GSM8327212", null, "source name:whole embryo|tissue:whole embryo|treatment:1percent DMSO control and cell cycle arrest at 14 hpf|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing", "Reference experiment  14 hpf 24 hpf biological replicate 2 and 3  technical replicate 2", "Multiple samples are pooled for each sequencing run. Raw FASTQ were prepared from Illumina bcl files in a format compatible with the inDrops.py pipeline. Each nextseq run results in 16 FASTQ files 4 lanes x 4 reads per lane. For some pooled libraries  sequencing was run twice to get more UMIs per cell and hence we have deposited 16x2 = 32 raw files for those sequencing samples. The illumina library indices of different samples in a run are provided in the meta data. These can be used to demultiplex the raw file into separate libraries. The read files from an inDrops run have the following content: * R1 001.fastq.gz : contains the three prime UTR cDNA read * R2 001.fastq.gz : contains the first half of the cell barcode * R3 001.fastq.gz : contains the library index for demultiplexing libraries * R4 001.fastq.gz : contains the second half of the barcode and the UMI.  All subsequent processing steps from FASTQ files to count matrixes were performed using the custom pipeline for inDrops data analysis github.com/indrops. Single cell transcriptomes were barcoded using inDrops Klein et al  Cell 2015. Standard transcriptome RNA seq libraries were processed as reported in Zilionis et al. Nature Protocol 2016 using inDrops v3 protocol. The transcriptome libraries were sequenced on reads Illumina NextSeq 500. Libraries used standard Illumina sequencing primers and 61 cycles for Read1  14 cycles for Read2  8 cycles each for IndexRead1 and IndexRead2. Raw fastq files was processed using inDrops.py pipeline github.com/indrops/indrops. Sequenced reads were mapped to a zebrafish reference transcriptome built from the zebrafish GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 using bowtie version 1.1.143. To obtain the final counts matrix used for data analysis  total count filters were applied as described in Kukreja et. al. 2024  method section \"Single cell RNA seq Data preprocessing\" Assembly: GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 Supplementary files format and content: Raw counts tsv.gz: cell barcode  gene names  and raw counts for all cells Supplementary files format and content: Metadata metadata.csv: library identity  cell barcode  and associated metadata for all cells   time point  treatment  replicate  annotated cell state  total number of counts  etc Library strategy: inDrops v3 scRNA seq", "whole embryo", "Zebrafish embryos were arrested for cell cycle using two complementary approaches. S phase cell cycle arrest was induced using a cocktail of drugs \u2013 hydroxyurea Sigma Aldrich H8627 5G at 20 mM and aphidicolin Sigma Aldrich A0781 5MG at 150 \u00b5M concentration in 1% dimethyl sulfoxide DMSO in egg water. G2/M phase arrest was induced by crossing heterozygous emi1 wt/mut zebrafish to generate homozygous emi1 mut/mut embryos  referred as hi2648 in the manuscript. Homozygous mutants with cell cycle arrest were screened at 24 hpf as they have very clear phenotype by this time \u2013 these embryos are smaller and have bent tails and the heterozygous mutants and wildtype are indistinguishable.", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", "AB wild type strains were used for all HUA perturbation experiments. Zebrafish mutant line hi2648  a mutant for the gene emi1  was kindly gifted by Dr. Jennifer Rhodes. Embryos were developed within the ambient temperature of Zebrafish development. Time of fertilization at 28.5 C was used to stage each clutch and this was confirmed using morphological features of the embryos. All zebrafish were housed in a facility overseen by the Harvard Medical Area Standing Committee on Animals our IACUC which performs regular inspections and under which we have an approved protocol for all animal procedures.", "tissue:whole embryo|treatment:1percent DMSO control and cell cycle arrest at 14 hpf", "GSM8327212", "GSM8327212: Reference experiment  14 hpf 24 hpf biological replicate 2 and 3  technical replicate 2; Danio rerio; OTHER", "GSM8327212 r1", "GSM8327212", "1", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", null, "OTHER", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "NextSeq 500", null, "SRP513754", null, null, "ref_exp_brep2_3_trep2_S0_L003_R1_001.fastq.gz ref_exp_brep2_3_trep2_S0_L003_R2_001.fastq.gz ref_exp_brep2_3_trep2_S0_L003_R3_001.fastq.gz ref_exp_brep2_3_trep2_S0_L003_R4_001.fastq.gz", "fastq fastq fastq fastq", 12523818580.0, 137624380.0, "GSM8327212 r3", "0:61 1:8 2:8 3:14", "A:2324226717;C:1670367024;G:1657065051;T:2743216042;N:212346", 61, 8, 8, 14, 2324226717, 1670367024, 1657065051, 2743216042, 212346, "SRX24912663", "SRS21618597", "SRA1898111", "Harvard University", "Harvard University", null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, "B", null, "usable mapping rate", "illumina", "nextseq", "unknown", "other", "trueseq", "sc", "single_cell_droplet", "indrops", null, "United States", "2024-06-13", "Multi-stage", "Embryo", "Whole Organism", "All anatomical structures"], [32768, "SRR29398905", "SRX24912663", "SRS21618597", "SRP513754", "PRJNA1123686", "Cell state transitions are decoupled from cell division during early embryo development [I]", "GSE269784", "Other", "As tissues develop  cells divide and differentiate concurrently. Conflicting evidence shows that cell division is either dispensable or required for formation of cell types. To determine the role of cell division in differentiation  we arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos using two independent approaches and profiled them at single cell resolution. We show that cell division is dispensable for differentiation of all embryonic tissues during initial cell type differentiation from early gastrulation to the end of segmentation. However  in the absence of cell division  differentiation slows down in some cell types  and cells exhibit global stress responses. While differentiation is robust to blocking cell division  the proportions of cells across cell states are not but show evidence of partial compensation. This work clarifies our understanding of the role of cell division in development and showcases the utility of combining embryo wide perturbations with single cell RNA sequencing to uncover the role of common biological processes across multiple tissues. Overall design: We arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos at 6 hpf using two independent approaches: a chemical approach hydroxyurea and aphidicolin  HUA and a genetic approach involving a loss of function mutation in the gene emi1 allele hi2648. We tracked differentiation dynamics using single cell RNA sequencing scRNA seq on embryos spanning 6\u201324 hpf for HUA treated and control embryos  and at 24 hpf for emi1 mutant embryos. Overall we have collected multiple replicates for control embryos ABs at 6  8  10  14  18  21 hpf and 24 hpf  for HUA treated at 8  10  14 hpf and 24 hpf and for emi1 mutants at 24 hpf.  Details about the samples can be found in the supplementary file \"sample information.txt\"", null, "pubmed:37546736", null, "Reference experiment  14 hpf 24 hpf biological replicate 2 and 3  technical replicate 2", "GSM8327212", null, "source name:whole embryo|tissue:whole embryo|treatment:1percent DMSO control and cell cycle arrest at 14 hpf|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing", "Reference experiment  14 hpf 24 hpf biological replicate 2 and 3  technical replicate 2", "Multiple samples are pooled for each sequencing run. Raw FASTQ were prepared from Illumina bcl files in a format compatible with the inDrops.py pipeline. Each nextseq run results in 16 FASTQ files 4 lanes x 4 reads per lane. For some pooled libraries  sequencing was run twice to get more UMIs per cell and hence we have deposited 16x2 = 32 raw files for those sequencing samples. The illumina library indices of different samples in a run are provided in the meta data. These can be used to demultiplex the raw file into separate libraries. The read files from an inDrops run have the following content: * R1 001.fastq.gz : contains the three prime UTR cDNA read * R2 001.fastq.gz : contains the first half of the cell barcode * R3 001.fastq.gz : contains the library index for demultiplexing libraries * R4 001.fastq.gz : contains the second half of the barcode and the UMI.  All subsequent processing steps from FASTQ files to count matrixes were performed using the custom pipeline for inDrops data analysis github.com/indrops. Single cell transcriptomes were barcoded using inDrops Klein et al  Cell 2015. Standard transcriptome RNA seq libraries were processed as reported in Zilionis et al. Nature Protocol 2016 using inDrops v3 protocol. The transcriptome libraries were sequenced on reads Illumina NextSeq 500. Libraries used standard Illumina sequencing primers and 61 cycles for Read1  14 cycles for Read2  8 cycles each for IndexRead1 and IndexRead2. Raw fastq files was processed using inDrops.py pipeline github.com/indrops/indrops. Sequenced reads were mapped to a zebrafish reference transcriptome built from the zebrafish GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 using bowtie version 1.1.143. To obtain the final counts matrix used for data analysis  total count filters were applied as described in Kukreja et. al. 2024  method section \"Single cell RNA seq Data preprocessing\" Assembly: GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 Supplementary files format and content: Raw counts tsv.gz: cell barcode  gene names  and raw counts for all cells Supplementary files format and content: Metadata metadata.csv: library identity  cell barcode  and associated metadata for all cells   time point  treatment  replicate  annotated cell state  total number of counts  etc Library strategy: inDrops v3 scRNA seq", "whole embryo", "Zebrafish embryos were arrested for cell cycle using two complementary approaches. S phase cell cycle arrest was induced using a cocktail of drugs \u2013 hydroxyurea Sigma Aldrich H8627 5G at 20 mM and aphidicolin Sigma Aldrich A0781 5MG at 150 \u00b5M concentration in 1% dimethyl sulfoxide DMSO in egg water. G2/M phase arrest was induced by crossing heterozygous emi1 wt/mut zebrafish to generate homozygous emi1 mut/mut embryos  referred as hi2648 in the manuscript. Homozygous mutants with cell cycle arrest were screened at 24 hpf as they have very clear phenotype by this time \u2013 these embryos are smaller and have bent tails and the heterozygous mutants and wildtype are indistinguishable.", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", "AB wild type strains were used for all HUA perturbation experiments. Zebrafish mutant line hi2648  a mutant for the gene emi1  was kindly gifted by Dr. Jennifer Rhodes. Embryos were developed within the ambient temperature of Zebrafish development. Time of fertilization at 28.5 C was used to stage each clutch and this was confirmed using morphological features of the embryos. All zebrafish were housed in a facility overseen by the Harvard Medical Area Standing Committee on Animals our IACUC which performs regular inspections and under which we have an approved protocol for all animal procedures.", "tissue:whole embryo|treatment:1percent DMSO control and cell cycle arrest at 14 hpf", "GSM8327212", "GSM8327212: Reference experiment  14 hpf 24 hpf biological replicate 2 and 3  technical replicate 2; Danio rerio; OTHER", "GSM8327212 r1", "GSM8327212", "1", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", null, "OTHER", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "NextSeq 500", null, "SRP513754", null, null, "ref_exp_brep2_3_trep2_S0_L004_R1_001.fastq.gz ref_exp_brep2_3_trep2_S0_L004_R2_001.fastq.gz ref_exp_brep2_3_trep2_S0_L004_R3_001.fastq.gz ref_exp_brep2_3_trep2_S0_L004_R4_001.fastq.gz", "fastq fastq fastq fastq", 12439046074.0, 136692814.0, "GSM8327212 r4", "0:61 1:8 2:8 3:14", "A:2308308565;C:1661073675;G:1642305225;T:2726252574;N:321615", 61, 8, 8, 14, 2308308565, 1661073675, 1642305225, 2726252574, 321615, "SRX24912663", "SRS21618597", "SRA1898111", "Harvard University", "Harvard University", null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, "B", null, "usable mapping rate", "illumina", "nextseq", "unknown", "other", "trueseq", "sc", "single_cell_droplet", "indrops", null, "United States", "2024-06-13", "Multi-stage", "Embryo", "Whole Organism", "All anatomical structures"], [32769, "SRR29398908", "SRX24912662", "SRS21618595", "SRP513754", "PRJNA1123686", "Cell state transitions are decoupled from cell division during early embryo development [I]", "GSE269784", "Other", "As tissues develop  cells divide and differentiate concurrently. Conflicting evidence shows that cell division is either dispensable or required for formation of cell types. To determine the role of cell division in differentiation  we arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos using two independent approaches and profiled them at single cell resolution. We show that cell division is dispensable for differentiation of all embryonic tissues during initial cell type differentiation from early gastrulation to the end of segmentation. However  in the absence of cell division  differentiation slows down in some cell types  and cells exhibit global stress responses. While differentiation is robust to blocking cell division  the proportions of cells across cell states are not but show evidence of partial compensation. This work clarifies our understanding of the role of cell division in development and showcases the utility of combining embryo wide perturbations with single cell RNA sequencing to uncover the role of common biological processes across multiple tissues. Overall design: We arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos at 6 hpf using two independent approaches: a chemical approach hydroxyurea and aphidicolin  HUA and a genetic approach involving a loss of function mutation in the gene emi1 allele hi2648. We tracked differentiation dynamics using single cell RNA sequencing scRNA seq on embryos spanning 6\u201324 hpf for HUA treated and control embryos  and at 24 hpf for emi1 mutant embryos. Overall we have collected multiple replicates for control embryos ABs at 6  8  10  14  18  21 hpf and 24 hpf  for HUA treated at 8  10  14 hpf and 24 hpf and for emi1 mutants at 24 hpf.  Details about the samples can be found in the supplementary file \"sample information.txt\"", null, "pubmed:37546736", null, "Reference experiment  14 hpf 24 hpf biological replicate 1  technical replicate 2", "GSM8327211", null, "source name:whole embryo|tissue:whole embryo|treatment:1percent DMSO control and cell cycle arrest at 14 hpf|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing", "Reference experiment  14 hpf 24 hpf biological replicate 1  technical replicate 2", "Multiple samples are pooled for each sequencing run. Raw FASTQ were prepared from Illumina bcl files in a format compatible with the inDrops.py pipeline. Each nextseq run results in 16 FASTQ files 4 lanes x 4 reads per lane. For some pooled libraries  sequencing was run twice to get more UMIs per cell and hence we have deposited 16x2 = 32 raw files for those sequencing samples. The illumina library indices of different samples in a run are provided in the meta data. These can be used to demultiplex the raw file into separate libraries. The read files from an inDrops run have the following content: * R1 001.fastq.gz : contains the three prime UTR cDNA read * R2 001.fastq.gz : contains the first half of the cell barcode * R3 001.fastq.gz : contains the library index for demultiplexing libraries * R4 001.fastq.gz : contains the second half of the barcode and the UMI.  All subsequent processing steps from FASTQ files to count matrixes were performed using the custom pipeline for inDrops data analysis github.com/indrops. Single cell transcriptomes were barcoded using inDrops Klein et al  Cell 2015. Standard transcriptome RNA seq libraries were processed as reported in Zilionis et al. Nature Protocol 2016 using inDrops v3 protocol. The transcriptome libraries were sequenced on reads Illumina NextSeq 500. Libraries used standard Illumina sequencing primers and 61 cycles for Read1  14 cycles for Read2  8 cycles each for IndexRead1 and IndexRead2. Raw fastq files was processed using inDrops.py pipeline github.com/indrops/indrops. Sequenced reads were mapped to a zebrafish reference transcriptome built from the zebrafish GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 using bowtie version 1.1.143. To obtain the final counts matrix used for data analysis  total count filters were applied as described in Kukreja et. al. 2024  method section \"Single cell RNA seq Data preprocessing\" Assembly: GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 Supplementary files format and content: Raw counts tsv.gz: cell barcode  gene names  and raw counts for all cells Supplementary files format and content: Metadata metadata.csv: library identity  cell barcode  and associated metadata for all cells   time point  treatment  replicate  annotated cell state  total number of counts  etc Library strategy: inDrops v3 scRNA seq", "whole embryo", "Zebrafish embryos were arrested for cell cycle using two complementary approaches. S phase cell cycle arrest was induced using a cocktail of drugs \u2013 hydroxyurea Sigma Aldrich H8627 5G at 20 mM and aphidicolin Sigma Aldrich A0781 5MG at 150 \u00b5M concentration in 1% dimethyl sulfoxide DMSO in egg water. G2/M phase arrest was induced by crossing heterozygous emi1 wt/mut zebrafish to generate homozygous emi1 mut/mut embryos  referred as hi2648 in the manuscript. Homozygous mutants with cell cycle arrest were screened at 24 hpf as they have very clear phenotype by this time \u2013 these embryos are smaller and have bent tails and the heterozygous mutants and wildtype are indistinguishable.", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", "AB wild type strains were used for all HUA perturbation experiments. Zebrafish mutant line hi2648  a mutant for the gene emi1  was kindly gifted by Dr. Jennifer Rhodes. Embryos were developed within the ambient temperature of Zebrafish development. Time of fertilization at 28.5 C was used to stage each clutch and this was confirmed using morphological features of the embryos. All zebrafish were housed in a facility overseen by the Harvard Medical Area Standing Committee on Animals our IACUC which performs regular inspections and under which we have an approved protocol for all animal procedures.", "tissue:whole embryo|treatment:1percent DMSO control and cell cycle arrest at 14 hpf", "GSM8327211", "GSM8327211: Reference experiment  14 hpf 24 hpf biological replicate 1  technical replicate 2; Danio rerio; OTHER", "GSM8327211 r1", "GSM8327211", "1", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", null, "OTHER", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "NextSeq 500", null, "SRP513754", null, null, "ref_exp_brep1_trep2_S0_L001_R1_001.fastq.gz ref_exp_brep1_trep2_S0_L001_R2_001.fastq.gz ref_exp_brep1_trep2_S0_L001_R3_001.fastq.gz ref_exp_brep1_trep2_S0_L001_R4_001.fastq.gz", "fastq fastq fastq fastq", 13075759970.0, 143689670.0, "GSM8327211 r1", "0:61 1:8 2:8 3:14", "A:2455617490;C:1722060255;G:1704083809;T:2882118632;N:1189684", 61, 8, 8, 14, 2455617490, 1722060255, 1704083809, 2882118632, 1189684, "SRX24912662", "SRS21618595", "SRA1898111", "Harvard University", "Harvard University", null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, "B", null, "usable mapping rate", "illumina", "nextseq", "unknown", "other", "trueseq", "sc", "single_cell_droplet", "indrops", null, "United States", "2024-06-13", "Multi-stage", "Embryo", "Whole Organism", "All anatomical structures"], [32770, "SRR29398909", "SRX24912662", "SRS21618595", "SRP513754", "PRJNA1123686", "Cell state transitions are decoupled from cell division during early embryo development [I]", "GSE269784", "Other", "As tissues develop  cells divide and differentiate concurrently. Conflicting evidence shows that cell division is either dispensable or required for formation of cell types. To determine the role of cell division in differentiation  we arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos using two independent approaches and profiled them at single cell resolution. We show that cell division is dispensable for differentiation of all embryonic tissues during initial cell type differentiation from early gastrulation to the end of segmentation. However  in the absence of cell division  differentiation slows down in some cell types  and cells exhibit global stress responses. While differentiation is robust to blocking cell division  the proportions of cells across cell states are not but show evidence of partial compensation. This work clarifies our understanding of the role of cell division in development and showcases the utility of combining embryo wide perturbations with single cell RNA sequencing to uncover the role of common biological processes across multiple tissues. Overall design: We arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos at 6 hpf using two independent approaches: a chemical approach hydroxyurea and aphidicolin  HUA and a genetic approach involving a loss of function mutation in the gene emi1 allele hi2648. We tracked differentiation dynamics using single cell RNA sequencing scRNA seq on embryos spanning 6\u201324 hpf for HUA treated and control embryos  and at 24 hpf for emi1 mutant embryos. Overall we have collected multiple replicates for control embryos ABs at 6  8  10  14  18  21 hpf and 24 hpf  for HUA treated at 8  10  14 hpf and 24 hpf and for emi1 mutants at 24 hpf.  Details about the samples can be found in the supplementary file \"sample information.txt\"", null, "pubmed:37546736", null, "Reference experiment  14 hpf 24 hpf biological replicate 1  technical replicate 2", "GSM8327211", null, "source name:whole embryo|tissue:whole embryo|treatment:1percent DMSO control and cell cycle arrest at 14 hpf|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing", "Reference experiment  14 hpf 24 hpf biological replicate 1  technical replicate 2", "Multiple samples are pooled for each sequencing run. Raw FASTQ were prepared from Illumina bcl files in a format compatible with the inDrops.py pipeline. Each nextseq run results in 16 FASTQ files 4 lanes x 4 reads per lane. For some pooled libraries  sequencing was run twice to get more UMIs per cell and hence we have deposited 16x2 = 32 raw files for those sequencing samples. The illumina library indices of different samples in a run are provided in the meta data. These can be used to demultiplex the raw file into separate libraries. The read files from an inDrops run have the following content: * R1 001.fastq.gz : contains the three prime UTR cDNA read * R2 001.fastq.gz : contains the first half of the cell barcode * R3 001.fastq.gz : contains the library index for demultiplexing libraries * R4 001.fastq.gz : contains the second half of the barcode and the UMI.  All subsequent processing steps from FASTQ files to count matrixes were performed using the custom pipeline for inDrops data analysis github.com/indrops. Single cell transcriptomes were barcoded using inDrops Klein et al  Cell 2015. Standard transcriptome RNA seq libraries were processed as reported in Zilionis et al. Nature Protocol 2016 using inDrops v3 protocol. The transcriptome libraries were sequenced on reads Illumina NextSeq 500. Libraries used standard Illumina sequencing primers and 61 cycles for Read1  14 cycles for Read2  8 cycles each for IndexRead1 and IndexRead2. Raw fastq files was processed using inDrops.py pipeline github.com/indrops/indrops. Sequenced reads were mapped to a zebrafish reference transcriptome built from the zebrafish GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 using bowtie version 1.1.143. To obtain the final counts matrix used for data analysis  total count filters were applied as described in Kukreja et. al. 2024  method section \"Single cell RNA seq Data preprocessing\" Assembly: GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 Supplementary files format and content: Raw counts tsv.gz: cell barcode  gene names  and raw counts for all cells Supplementary files format and content: Metadata metadata.csv: library identity  cell barcode  and associated metadata for all cells   time point  treatment  replicate  annotated cell state  total number of counts  etc Library strategy: inDrops v3 scRNA seq", "whole embryo", "Zebrafish embryos were arrested for cell cycle using two complementary approaches. S phase cell cycle arrest was induced using a cocktail of drugs \u2013 hydroxyurea Sigma Aldrich H8627 5G at 20 mM and aphidicolin Sigma Aldrich A0781 5MG at 150 \u00b5M concentration in 1% dimethyl sulfoxide DMSO in egg water. G2/M phase arrest was induced by crossing heterozygous emi1 wt/mut zebrafish to generate homozygous emi1 mut/mut embryos  referred as hi2648 in the manuscript. Homozygous mutants with cell cycle arrest were screened at 24 hpf as they have very clear phenotype by this time \u2013 these embryos are smaller and have bent tails and the heterozygous mutants and wildtype are indistinguishable.", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", "AB wild type strains were used for all HUA perturbation experiments. Zebrafish mutant line hi2648  a mutant for the gene emi1  was kindly gifted by Dr. Jennifer Rhodes. Embryos were developed within the ambient temperature of Zebrafish development. Time of fertilization at 28.5 C was used to stage each clutch and this was confirmed using morphological features of the embryos. All zebrafish were housed in a facility overseen by the Harvard Medical Area Standing Committee on Animals our IACUC which performs regular inspections and under which we have an approved protocol for all animal procedures.", "tissue:whole embryo|treatment:1percent DMSO control and cell cycle arrest at 14 hpf", "GSM8327211", "GSM8327211: Reference experiment  14 hpf 24 hpf biological replicate 1  technical replicate 2; Danio rerio; OTHER", "GSM8327211 r1", "GSM8327211", "1", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", null, "OTHER", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "NextSeq 500", null, "SRP513754", null, null, "ref_exp_brep1_trep2_S0_L002_R1_001.fastq.gz ref_exp_brep1_trep2_S0_L002_R2_001.fastq.gz ref_exp_brep1_trep2_S0_L002_R3_001.fastq.gz ref_exp_brep1_trep2_S0_L002_R4_001.fastq.gz", "fastq fastq fastq fastq", 12965375878.0, 142476658.0, "GSM8327211 r2", "0:61 1:8 2:8 3:14", "A:2436528726;C:1704297673;G:1691673766;T:2857349303;N:1226670", 61, 8, 8, 14, 2436528726, 1704297673, 1691673766, 2857349303, 1226670, "SRX24912662", "SRS21618595", "SRA1898111", "Harvard University", "Harvard University", null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, "B", null, "usable mapping rate", "illumina", "nextseq", "unknown", "other", "trueseq", "sc", "single_cell_droplet", "indrops", null, "United States", "2024-06-13", "Multi-stage", "Embryo", "Whole Organism", "All anatomical structures"], [32771, "SRR29398910", "SRX24912662", "SRS21618595", "SRP513754", "PRJNA1123686", "Cell state transitions are decoupled from cell division during early embryo development [I]", "GSE269784", "Other", "As tissues develop  cells divide and differentiate concurrently. Conflicting evidence shows that cell division is either dispensable or required for formation of cell types. To determine the role of cell division in differentiation  we arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos using two independent approaches and profiled them at single cell resolution. We show that cell division is dispensable for differentiation of all embryonic tissues during initial cell type differentiation from early gastrulation to the end of segmentation. However  in the absence of cell division  differentiation slows down in some cell types  and cells exhibit global stress responses. While differentiation is robust to blocking cell division  the proportions of cells across cell states are not but show evidence of partial compensation. This work clarifies our understanding of the role of cell division in development and showcases the utility of combining embryo wide perturbations with single cell RNA sequencing to uncover the role of common biological processes across multiple tissues. Overall design: We arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos at 6 hpf using two independent approaches: a chemical approach hydroxyurea and aphidicolin  HUA and a genetic approach involving a loss of function mutation in the gene emi1 allele hi2648. We tracked differentiation dynamics using single cell RNA sequencing scRNA seq on embryos spanning 6\u201324 hpf for HUA treated and control embryos  and at 24 hpf for emi1 mutant embryos. Overall we have collected multiple replicates for control embryos ABs at 6  8  10  14  18  21 hpf and 24 hpf  for HUA treated at 8  10  14 hpf and 24 hpf and for emi1 mutants at 24 hpf.  Details about the samples can be found in the supplementary file \"sample information.txt\"", null, "pubmed:37546736", null, "Reference experiment  14 hpf 24 hpf biological replicate 1  technical replicate 2", "GSM8327211", null, "source name:whole embryo|tissue:whole embryo|treatment:1percent DMSO control and cell cycle arrest at 14 hpf|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing", "Reference experiment  14 hpf 24 hpf biological replicate 1  technical replicate 2", "Multiple samples are pooled for each sequencing run. Raw FASTQ were prepared from Illumina bcl files in a format compatible with the inDrops.py pipeline. Each nextseq run results in 16 FASTQ files 4 lanes x 4 reads per lane. For some pooled libraries  sequencing was run twice to get more UMIs per cell and hence we have deposited 16x2 = 32 raw files for those sequencing samples. The illumina library indices of different samples in a run are provided in the meta data. These can be used to demultiplex the raw file into separate libraries. The read files from an inDrops run have the following content: * R1 001.fastq.gz : contains the three prime UTR cDNA read * R2 001.fastq.gz : contains the first half of the cell barcode * R3 001.fastq.gz : contains the library index for demultiplexing libraries * R4 001.fastq.gz : contains the second half of the barcode and the UMI.  All subsequent processing steps from FASTQ files to count matrixes were performed using the custom pipeline for inDrops data analysis github.com/indrops. Single cell transcriptomes were barcoded using inDrops Klein et al  Cell 2015. Standard transcriptome RNA seq libraries were processed as reported in Zilionis et al. Nature Protocol 2016 using inDrops v3 protocol. The transcriptome libraries were sequenced on reads Illumina NextSeq 500. Libraries used standard Illumina sequencing primers and 61 cycles for Read1  14 cycles for Read2  8 cycles each for IndexRead1 and IndexRead2. Raw fastq files was processed using inDrops.py pipeline github.com/indrops/indrops. Sequenced reads were mapped to a zebrafish reference transcriptome built from the zebrafish GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 using bowtie version 1.1.143. To obtain the final counts matrix used for data analysis  total count filters were applied as described in Kukreja et. al. 2024  method section \"Single cell RNA seq Data preprocessing\" Assembly: GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 Supplementary files format and content: Raw counts tsv.gz: cell barcode  gene names  and raw counts for all cells Supplementary files format and content: Metadata metadata.csv: library identity  cell barcode  and associated metadata for all cells   time point  treatment  replicate  annotated cell state  total number of counts  etc Library strategy: inDrops v3 scRNA seq", "whole embryo", "Zebrafish embryos were arrested for cell cycle using two complementary approaches. S phase cell cycle arrest was induced using a cocktail of drugs \u2013 hydroxyurea Sigma Aldrich H8627 5G at 20 mM and aphidicolin Sigma Aldrich A0781 5MG at 150 \u00b5M concentration in 1% dimethyl sulfoxide DMSO in egg water. G2/M phase arrest was induced by crossing heterozygous emi1 wt/mut zebrafish to generate homozygous emi1 mut/mut embryos  referred as hi2648 in the manuscript. Homozygous mutants with cell cycle arrest were screened at 24 hpf as they have very clear phenotype by this time \u2013 these embryos are smaller and have bent tails and the heterozygous mutants and wildtype are indistinguishable.", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", "AB wild type strains were used for all HUA perturbation experiments. Zebrafish mutant line hi2648  a mutant for the gene emi1  was kindly gifted by Dr. Jennifer Rhodes. Embryos were developed within the ambient temperature of Zebrafish development. Time of fertilization at 28.5 C was used to stage each clutch and this was confirmed using morphological features of the embryos. All zebrafish were housed in a facility overseen by the Harvard Medical Area Standing Committee on Animals our IACUC which performs regular inspections and under which we have an approved protocol for all animal procedures.", "tissue:whole embryo|treatment:1percent DMSO control and cell cycle arrest at 14 hpf", "GSM8327211", "GSM8327211: Reference experiment  14 hpf 24 hpf biological replicate 1  technical replicate 2; Danio rerio; OTHER", "GSM8327211 r1", "GSM8327211", "1", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", null, "OTHER", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "NextSeq 500", null, "SRP513754", null, null, "ref_exp_brep1_trep2_S0_L003_R1_001.fastq.gz ref_exp_brep1_trep2_S0_L003_R2_001.fastq.gz ref_exp_brep1_trep2_S0_L003_R3_001.fastq.gz ref_exp_brep1_trep2_S0_L003_R4_001.fastq.gz", "fastq fastq fastq fastq", 13020225309.0, 143079399.0, "GSM8327211 r3", "0:61 1:8 2:8 3:14", "A:2448925813;C:1710138232;G:1703095600;T:2864268220;N:1415474", 61, 8, 8, 14, 2448925813, 1710138232, 1703095600, 2864268220, 1415474, "SRX24912662", "SRS21618595", "SRA1898111", "Harvard University", "Harvard University", null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, "B", null, "usable mapping rate", "illumina", "nextseq", "unknown", "other", "trueseq", "sc", "single_cell_droplet", "indrops", null, "United States", "2024-06-13", "Multi-stage", "Embryo", "Whole Organism", "All anatomical structures"], [32772, "SRR29398911", "SRX24912662", "SRS21618595", "SRP513754", "PRJNA1123686", "Cell state transitions are decoupled from cell division during early embryo development [I]", "GSE269784", "Other", "As tissues develop  cells divide and differentiate concurrently. Conflicting evidence shows that cell division is either dispensable or required for formation of cell types. To determine the role of cell division in differentiation  we arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos using two independent approaches and profiled them at single cell resolution. We show that cell division is dispensable for differentiation of all embryonic tissues during initial cell type differentiation from early gastrulation to the end of segmentation. However  in the absence of cell division  differentiation slows down in some cell types  and cells exhibit global stress responses. While differentiation is robust to blocking cell division  the proportions of cells across cell states are not but show evidence of partial compensation. This work clarifies our understanding of the role of cell division in development and showcases the utility of combining embryo wide perturbations with single cell RNA sequencing to uncover the role of common biological processes across multiple tissues. Overall design: We arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos at 6 hpf using two independent approaches: a chemical approach hydroxyurea and aphidicolin  HUA and a genetic approach involving a loss of function mutation in the gene emi1 allele hi2648. We tracked differentiation dynamics using single cell RNA sequencing scRNA seq on embryos spanning 6\u201324 hpf for HUA treated and control embryos  and at 24 hpf for emi1 mutant embryos. Overall we have collected multiple replicates for control embryos ABs at 6  8  10  14  18  21 hpf and 24 hpf  for HUA treated at 8  10  14 hpf and 24 hpf and for emi1 mutants at 24 hpf.  Details about the samples can be found in the supplementary file \"sample information.txt\"", null, "pubmed:37546736", null, "Reference experiment  14 hpf 24 hpf biological replicate 1  technical replicate 2", "GSM8327211", null, "source name:whole embryo|tissue:whole embryo|treatment:1percent DMSO control and cell cycle arrest at 14 hpf|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing", "Reference experiment  14 hpf 24 hpf biological replicate 1  technical replicate 2", "Multiple samples are pooled for each sequencing run. Raw FASTQ were prepared from Illumina bcl files in a format compatible with the inDrops.py pipeline. Each nextseq run results in 16 FASTQ files 4 lanes x 4 reads per lane. For some pooled libraries  sequencing was run twice to get more UMIs per cell and hence we have deposited 16x2 = 32 raw files for those sequencing samples. The illumina library indices of different samples in a run are provided in the meta data. These can be used to demultiplex the raw file into separate libraries. The read files from an inDrops run have the following content: * R1 001.fastq.gz : contains the three prime UTR cDNA read * R2 001.fastq.gz : contains the first half of the cell barcode * R3 001.fastq.gz : contains the library index for demultiplexing libraries * R4 001.fastq.gz : contains the second half of the barcode and the UMI.  All subsequent processing steps from FASTQ files to count matrixes were performed using the custom pipeline for inDrops data analysis github.com/indrops. Single cell transcriptomes were barcoded using inDrops Klein et al  Cell 2015. Standard transcriptome RNA seq libraries were processed as reported in Zilionis et al. Nature Protocol 2016 using inDrops v3 protocol. The transcriptome libraries were sequenced on reads Illumina NextSeq 500. Libraries used standard Illumina sequencing primers and 61 cycles for Read1  14 cycles for Read2  8 cycles each for IndexRead1 and IndexRead2. Raw fastq files was processed using inDrops.py pipeline github.com/indrops/indrops. Sequenced reads were mapped to a zebrafish reference transcriptome built from the zebrafish GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 using bowtie version 1.1.143. To obtain the final counts matrix used for data analysis  total count filters were applied as described in Kukreja et. al. 2024  method section \"Single cell RNA seq Data preprocessing\" Assembly: GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 Supplementary files format and content: Raw counts tsv.gz: cell barcode  gene names  and raw counts for all cells Supplementary files format and content: Metadata metadata.csv: library identity  cell barcode  and associated metadata for all cells   time point  treatment  replicate  annotated cell state  total number of counts  etc Library strategy: inDrops v3 scRNA seq", "whole embryo", "Zebrafish embryos were arrested for cell cycle using two complementary approaches. S phase cell cycle arrest was induced using a cocktail of drugs \u2013 hydroxyurea Sigma Aldrich H8627 5G at 20 mM and aphidicolin Sigma Aldrich A0781 5MG at 150 \u00b5M concentration in 1% dimethyl sulfoxide DMSO in egg water. G2/M phase arrest was induced by crossing heterozygous emi1 wt/mut zebrafish to generate homozygous emi1 mut/mut embryos  referred as hi2648 in the manuscript. Homozygous mutants with cell cycle arrest were screened at 24 hpf as they have very clear phenotype by this time \u2013 these embryos are smaller and have bent tails and the heterozygous mutants and wildtype are indistinguishable.", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", "AB wild type strains were used for all HUA perturbation experiments. Zebrafish mutant line hi2648  a mutant for the gene emi1  was kindly gifted by Dr. Jennifer Rhodes. Embryos were developed within the ambient temperature of Zebrafish development. Time of fertilization at 28.5 C was used to stage each clutch and this was confirmed using morphological features of the embryos. All zebrafish were housed in a facility overseen by the Harvard Medical Area Standing Committee on Animals our IACUC which performs regular inspections and under which we have an approved protocol for all animal procedures.", "tissue:whole embryo|treatment:1percent DMSO control and cell cycle arrest at 14 hpf", "GSM8327211", "GSM8327211: Reference experiment  14 hpf 24 hpf biological replicate 1  technical replicate 2; Danio rerio; OTHER", "GSM8327211 r1", "GSM8327211", "1", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", null, "OTHER", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "NextSeq 500", null, "SRP513754", null, null, "ref_exp_brep1_trep2_S0_L004_R1_001.fastq.gz ref_exp_brep1_trep2_S0_L004_R2_001.fastq.gz ref_exp_brep1_trep2_S0_L004_R3_001.fastq.gz ref_exp_brep1_trep2_S0_L004_R4_001.fastq.gz", "fastq fastq fastq fastq", 12968634588.0, 142512468.0, "GSM8327211 r4", "0:61 1:8 2:8 3:14", "A:2438050928;C:1706654424;G:1693567829;T:2853585948;N:1401419", 61, 8, 8, 14, 2438050928, 1706654424, 1693567829, 2853585948, 1401419, "SRX24912662", "SRS21618595", "SRA1898111", "Harvard University", "Harvard University", null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, "B", null, "usable mapping rate", "illumina", "nextseq", "unknown", "other", "trueseq", "sc", "single_cell_droplet", "indrops", null, "United States", "2024-06-13", "Multi-stage", "Embryo", "Whole Organism", "All anatomical structures"], [32773, "SRR29398912", "SRX24912661", "SRS21618596", "SRP513754", "PRJNA1123686", "Cell state transitions are decoupled from cell division during early embryo development [I]", "GSE269784", "Other", "As tissues develop  cells divide and differentiate concurrently. Conflicting evidence shows that cell division is either dispensable or required for formation of cell types. To determine the role of cell division in differentiation  we arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos using two independent approaches and profiled them at single cell resolution. We show that cell division is dispensable for differentiation of all embryonic tissues during initial cell type differentiation from early gastrulation to the end of segmentation. However  in the absence of cell division  differentiation slows down in some cell types  and cells exhibit global stress responses. While differentiation is robust to blocking cell division  the proportions of cells across cell states are not but show evidence of partial compensation. This work clarifies our understanding of the role of cell division in development and showcases the utility of combining embryo wide perturbations with single cell RNA sequencing to uncover the role of common biological processes across multiple tissues. Overall design: We arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos at 6 hpf using two independent approaches: a chemical approach hydroxyurea and aphidicolin  HUA and a genetic approach involving a loss of function mutation in the gene emi1 allele hi2648. We tracked differentiation dynamics using single cell RNA sequencing scRNA seq on embryos spanning 6\u201324 hpf for HUA treated and control embryos  and at 24 hpf for emi1 mutant embryos. Overall we have collected multiple replicates for control embryos ABs at 6  8  10  14  18  21 hpf and 24 hpf  for HUA treated at 8  10  14 hpf and 24 hpf and for emi1 mutants at 24 hpf.  Details about the samples can be found in the supplementary file \"sample information.txt\"", null, "pubmed:37546736", null, "Reference experiment  14 hpf 24 hpf biological replicate 2 and 3  technical replicate 1", "GSM8327210", null, "source name:whole embryo|tissue:whole embryo|treatment:1percent DMSO control and cell cycle arrest at 14 hpf|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing", "Reference experiment  14 hpf 24 hpf biological replicate 2 and 3  technical replicate 1", "Multiple samples are pooled for each sequencing run. Raw FASTQ were prepared from Illumina bcl files in a format compatible with the inDrops.py pipeline. Each nextseq run results in 16 FASTQ files 4 lanes x 4 reads per lane. For some pooled libraries  sequencing was run twice to get more UMIs per cell and hence we have deposited 16x2 = 32 raw files for those sequencing samples. The illumina library indices of different samples in a run are provided in the meta data. These can be used to demultiplex the raw file into separate libraries. The read files from an inDrops run have the following content: * R1 001.fastq.gz : contains the three prime UTR cDNA read * R2 001.fastq.gz : contains the first half of the cell barcode * R3 001.fastq.gz : contains the library index for demultiplexing libraries * R4 001.fastq.gz : contains the second half of the barcode and the UMI.  All subsequent processing steps from FASTQ files to count matrixes were performed using the custom pipeline for inDrops data analysis github.com/indrops. Single cell transcriptomes were barcoded using inDrops Klein et al  Cell 2015. Standard transcriptome RNA seq libraries were processed as reported in Zilionis et al. Nature Protocol 2016 using inDrops v3 protocol. The transcriptome libraries were sequenced on reads Illumina NextSeq 500. Libraries used standard Illumina sequencing primers and 61 cycles for Read1  14 cycles for Read2  8 cycles each for IndexRead1 and IndexRead2. Raw fastq files was processed using inDrops.py pipeline github.com/indrops/indrops. Sequenced reads were mapped to a zebrafish reference transcriptome built from the zebrafish GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 using bowtie version 1.1.143. To obtain the final counts matrix used for data analysis  total count filters were applied as described in Kukreja et. al. 2024  method section \"Single cell RNA seq Data preprocessing\" Assembly: GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 Supplementary files format and content: Raw counts tsv.gz: cell barcode  gene names  and raw counts for all cells Supplementary files format and content: Metadata metadata.csv: library identity  cell barcode  and associated metadata for all cells   time point  treatment  replicate  annotated cell state  total number of counts  etc Library strategy: inDrops v3 scRNA seq", "whole embryo", "Zebrafish embryos were arrested for cell cycle using two complementary approaches. S phase cell cycle arrest was induced using a cocktail of drugs \u2013 hydroxyurea Sigma Aldrich H8627 5G at 20 mM and aphidicolin Sigma Aldrich A0781 5MG at 150 \u00b5M concentration in 1% dimethyl sulfoxide DMSO in egg water. G2/M phase arrest was induced by crossing heterozygous emi1 wt/mut zebrafish to generate homozygous emi1 mut/mut embryos  referred as hi2648 in the manuscript. Homozygous mutants with cell cycle arrest were screened at 24 hpf as they have very clear phenotype by this time \u2013 these embryos are smaller and have bent tails and the heterozygous mutants and wildtype are indistinguishable.", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", "AB wild type strains were used for all HUA perturbation experiments. Zebrafish mutant line hi2648  a mutant for the gene emi1  was kindly gifted by Dr. Jennifer Rhodes. Embryos were developed within the ambient temperature of Zebrafish development. Time of fertilization at 28.5 C was used to stage each clutch and this was confirmed using morphological features of the embryos. All zebrafish were housed in a facility overseen by the Harvard Medical Area Standing Committee on Animals our IACUC which performs regular inspections and under which we have an approved protocol for all animal procedures.", "tissue:whole embryo|treatment:1percent DMSO control and cell cycle arrest at 14 hpf", "GSM8327210", "GSM8327210: Reference experiment  14 hpf 24 hpf biological replicate 2 and 3  technical replicate 1; Danio rerio; OTHER", "GSM8327210 r1", "GSM8327210", "1", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", null, "OTHER", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "NextSeq 500", null, "SRP513754", null, null, "ref_exp_brep2_3_trep1_S0_L001_R1_001.fastq.gz ref_exp_brep2_3_trep1_S0_L001_R2_001.fastq.gz ref_exp_brep2_3_trep1_S0_L001_R3_001.fastq.gz ref_exp_brep2_3_trep1_S0_L001_R4_001.fastq.gz", "fastq fastq fastq fastq", 10388141764.0, 114155404.0, "GSM8327210 r1", "0:61 1:8 2:8 3:14", "A:1922552965;C:1416885557;G:1386861514;T:2236850768;N:328840", 61, 8, 8, 14, 1922552965, 1416885557, 1386861514, 2236850768, 328840, "SRX24912661", "SRS21618596", "SRA1898111", "Harvard University", "Harvard University", null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, "B", null, "usable mapping rate", "illumina", "nextseq", "unknown", "other", "trueseq", "sc", "single_cell_droplet", "indrops", null, "United States", "2024-06-13", "Multi-stage", "Embryo", "Whole Organism", "All anatomical structures"], [32774, "SRR29398913", "SRX24912661", "SRS21618596", "SRP513754", "PRJNA1123686", "Cell state transitions are decoupled from cell division during early embryo development [I]", "GSE269784", "Other", "As tissues develop  cells divide and differentiate concurrently. Conflicting evidence shows that cell division is either dispensable or required for formation of cell types. To determine the role of cell division in differentiation  we arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos using two independent approaches and profiled them at single cell resolution. We show that cell division is dispensable for differentiation of all embryonic tissues during initial cell type differentiation from early gastrulation to the end of segmentation. However  in the absence of cell division  differentiation slows down in some cell types  and cells exhibit global stress responses. While differentiation is robust to blocking cell division  the proportions of cells across cell states are not but show evidence of partial compensation. This work clarifies our understanding of the role of cell division in development and showcases the utility of combining embryo wide perturbations with single cell RNA sequencing to uncover the role of common biological processes across multiple tissues. Overall design: We arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos at 6 hpf using two independent approaches: a chemical approach hydroxyurea and aphidicolin  HUA and a genetic approach involving a loss of function mutation in the gene emi1 allele hi2648. We tracked differentiation dynamics using single cell RNA sequencing scRNA seq on embryos spanning 6\u201324 hpf for HUA treated and control embryos  and at 24 hpf for emi1 mutant embryos. Overall we have collected multiple replicates for control embryos ABs at 6  8  10  14  18  21 hpf and 24 hpf  for HUA treated at 8  10  14 hpf and 24 hpf and for emi1 mutants at 24 hpf.  Details about the samples can be found in the supplementary file \"sample information.txt\"", null, "pubmed:37546736", null, "Reference experiment  14 hpf 24 hpf biological replicate 2 and 3  technical replicate 1", "GSM8327210", null, "source name:whole embryo|tissue:whole embryo|treatment:1percent DMSO control and cell cycle arrest at 14 hpf|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing", "Reference experiment  14 hpf 24 hpf biological replicate 2 and 3  technical replicate 1", "Multiple samples are pooled for each sequencing run. Raw FASTQ were prepared from Illumina bcl files in a format compatible with the inDrops.py pipeline. Each nextseq run results in 16 FASTQ files 4 lanes x 4 reads per lane. For some pooled libraries  sequencing was run twice to get more UMIs per cell and hence we have deposited 16x2 = 32 raw files for those sequencing samples. The illumina library indices of different samples in a run are provided in the meta data. These can be used to demultiplex the raw file into separate libraries. The read files from an inDrops run have the following content: * R1 001.fastq.gz : contains the three prime UTR cDNA read * R2 001.fastq.gz : contains the first half of the cell barcode * R3 001.fastq.gz : contains the library index for demultiplexing libraries * R4 001.fastq.gz : contains the second half of the barcode and the UMI.  All subsequent processing steps from FASTQ files to count matrixes were performed using the custom pipeline for inDrops data analysis github.com/indrops. Single cell transcriptomes were barcoded using inDrops Klein et al  Cell 2015. Standard transcriptome RNA seq libraries were processed as reported in Zilionis et al. Nature Protocol 2016 using inDrops v3 protocol. The transcriptome libraries were sequenced on reads Illumina NextSeq 500. Libraries used standard Illumina sequencing primers and 61 cycles for Read1  14 cycles for Read2  8 cycles each for IndexRead1 and IndexRead2. Raw fastq files was processed using inDrops.py pipeline github.com/indrops/indrops. Sequenced reads were mapped to a zebrafish reference transcriptome built from the zebrafish GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 using bowtie version 1.1.143. To obtain the final counts matrix used for data analysis  total count filters were applied as described in Kukreja et. al. 2024  method section \"Single cell RNA seq Data preprocessing\" Assembly: GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 Supplementary files format and content: Raw counts tsv.gz: cell barcode  gene names  and raw counts for all cells Supplementary files format and content: Metadata metadata.csv: library identity  cell barcode  and associated metadata for all cells   time point  treatment  replicate  annotated cell state  total number of counts  etc Library strategy: inDrops v3 scRNA seq", "whole embryo", "Zebrafish embryos were arrested for cell cycle using two complementary approaches. S phase cell cycle arrest was induced using a cocktail of drugs \u2013 hydroxyurea Sigma Aldrich H8627 5G at 20 mM and aphidicolin Sigma Aldrich A0781 5MG at 150 \u00b5M concentration in 1% dimethyl sulfoxide DMSO in egg water. G2/M phase arrest was induced by crossing heterozygous emi1 wt/mut zebrafish to generate homozygous emi1 mut/mut embryos  referred as hi2648 in the manuscript. Homozygous mutants with cell cycle arrest were screened at 24 hpf as they have very clear phenotype by this time \u2013 these embryos are smaller and have bent tails and the heterozygous mutants and wildtype are indistinguishable.", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", "AB wild type strains were used for all HUA perturbation experiments. Zebrafish mutant line hi2648  a mutant for the gene emi1  was kindly gifted by Dr. Jennifer Rhodes. Embryos were developed within the ambient temperature of Zebrafish development. Time of fertilization at 28.5 C was used to stage each clutch and this was confirmed using morphological features of the embryos. All zebrafish were housed in a facility overseen by the Harvard Medical Area Standing Committee on Animals our IACUC which performs regular inspections and under which we have an approved protocol for all animal procedures.", "tissue:whole embryo|treatment:1percent DMSO control and cell cycle arrest at 14 hpf", "GSM8327210", "GSM8327210: Reference experiment  14 hpf 24 hpf biological replicate 2 and 3  technical replicate 1; Danio rerio; OTHER", "GSM8327210 r1", "GSM8327210", "1", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", null, "OTHER", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "NextSeq 500", null, "SRP513754", null, null, "ref_exp_brep2_3_trep1_S0_L002_R1_001.fastq.gz ref_exp_brep2_3_trep1_S0_L002_R2_001.fastq.gz ref_exp_brep2_3_trep1_S0_L002_R3_001.fastq.gz ref_exp_brep2_3_trep1_S0_L002_R4_001.fastq.gz", "fastq fastq fastq fastq", 10440407978.0, 114729758.0, "GSM8327210 r2", "0:61 1:8 2:8 3:14", "A:1932601162;C:1422438299;G:1388104862;T:2254966360;N:404555", 61, 8, 8, 14, 1932601162, 1422438299, 1388104862, 2254966360, 404555, "SRX24912661", "SRS21618596", "SRA1898111", "Harvard University", "Harvard University", null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, "B", null, "usable mapping rate", "illumina", "nextseq", "unknown", "other", "trueseq", "sc", "single_cell_droplet", "indrops", null, "United States", "2024-06-13", "Multi-stage", "Embryo", "Whole Organism", "All anatomical structures"], [32775, "SRR29398914", "SRX24912661", "SRS21618596", "SRP513754", "PRJNA1123686", "Cell state transitions are decoupled from cell division during early embryo development [I]", "GSE269784", "Other", "As tissues develop  cells divide and differentiate concurrently. Conflicting evidence shows that cell division is either dispensable or required for formation of cell types. To determine the role of cell division in differentiation  we arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos using two independent approaches and profiled them at single cell resolution. We show that cell division is dispensable for differentiation of all embryonic tissues during initial cell type differentiation from early gastrulation to the end of segmentation. However  in the absence of cell division  differentiation slows down in some cell types  and cells exhibit global stress responses. While differentiation is robust to blocking cell division  the proportions of cells across cell states are not but show evidence of partial compensation. This work clarifies our understanding of the role of cell division in development and showcases the utility of combining embryo wide perturbations with single cell RNA sequencing to uncover the role of common biological processes across multiple tissues. Overall design: We arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos at 6 hpf using two independent approaches: a chemical approach hydroxyurea and aphidicolin  HUA and a genetic approach involving a loss of function mutation in the gene emi1 allele hi2648. We tracked differentiation dynamics using single cell RNA sequencing scRNA seq on embryos spanning 6\u201324 hpf for HUA treated and control embryos  and at 24 hpf for emi1 mutant embryos. Overall we have collected multiple replicates for control embryos ABs at 6  8  10  14  18  21 hpf and 24 hpf  for HUA treated at 8  10  14 hpf and 24 hpf and for emi1 mutants at 24 hpf.  Details about the samples can be found in the supplementary file \"sample information.txt\"", null, "pubmed:37546736", null, "Reference experiment  14 hpf 24 hpf biological replicate 2 and 3  technical replicate 1", "GSM8327210", null, "source name:whole embryo|tissue:whole embryo|treatment:1percent DMSO control and cell cycle arrest at 14 hpf|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing", "Reference experiment  14 hpf 24 hpf biological replicate 2 and 3  technical replicate 1", "Multiple samples are pooled for each sequencing run. Raw FASTQ were prepared from Illumina bcl files in a format compatible with the inDrops.py pipeline. Each nextseq run results in 16 FASTQ files 4 lanes x 4 reads per lane. For some pooled libraries  sequencing was run twice to get more UMIs per cell and hence we have deposited 16x2 = 32 raw files for those sequencing samples. The illumina library indices of different samples in a run are provided in the meta data. These can be used to demultiplex the raw file into separate libraries. The read files from an inDrops run have the following content: * R1 001.fastq.gz : contains the three prime UTR cDNA read * R2 001.fastq.gz : contains the first half of the cell barcode * R3 001.fastq.gz : contains the library index for demultiplexing libraries * R4 001.fastq.gz : contains the second half of the barcode and the UMI.  All subsequent processing steps from FASTQ files to count matrixes were performed using the custom pipeline for inDrops data analysis github.com/indrops. Single cell transcriptomes were barcoded using inDrops Klein et al  Cell 2015. Standard transcriptome RNA seq libraries were processed as reported in Zilionis et al. Nature Protocol 2016 using inDrops v3 protocol. The transcriptome libraries were sequenced on reads Illumina NextSeq 500. Libraries used standard Illumina sequencing primers and 61 cycles for Read1  14 cycles for Read2  8 cycles each for IndexRead1 and IndexRead2. Raw fastq files was processed using inDrops.py pipeline github.com/indrops/indrops. Sequenced reads were mapped to a zebrafish reference transcriptome built from the zebrafish GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 using bowtie version 1.1.143. To obtain the final counts matrix used for data analysis  total count filters were applied as described in Kukreja et. al. 2024  method section \"Single cell RNA seq Data preprocessing\" Assembly: GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 Supplementary files format and content: Raw counts tsv.gz: cell barcode  gene names  and raw counts for all cells Supplementary files format and content: Metadata metadata.csv: library identity  cell barcode  and associated metadata for all cells   time point  treatment  replicate  annotated cell state  total number of counts  etc Library strategy: inDrops v3 scRNA seq", "whole embryo", "Zebrafish embryos were arrested for cell cycle using two complementary approaches. S phase cell cycle arrest was induced using a cocktail of drugs \u2013 hydroxyurea Sigma Aldrich H8627 5G at 20 mM and aphidicolin Sigma Aldrich A0781 5MG at 150 \u00b5M concentration in 1% dimethyl sulfoxide DMSO in egg water. G2/M phase arrest was induced by crossing heterozygous emi1 wt/mut zebrafish to generate homozygous emi1 mut/mut embryos  referred as hi2648 in the manuscript. Homozygous mutants with cell cycle arrest were screened at 24 hpf as they have very clear phenotype by this time \u2013 these embryos are smaller and have bent tails and the heterozygous mutants and wildtype are indistinguishable.", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", "AB wild type strains were used for all HUA perturbation experiments. Zebrafish mutant line hi2648  a mutant for the gene emi1  was kindly gifted by Dr. Jennifer Rhodes. Embryos were developed within the ambient temperature of Zebrafish development. Time of fertilization at 28.5 C was used to stage each clutch and this was confirmed using morphological features of the embryos. All zebrafish were housed in a facility overseen by the Harvard Medical Area Standing Committee on Animals our IACUC which performs regular inspections and under which we have an approved protocol for all animal procedures.", "tissue:whole embryo|treatment:1percent DMSO control and cell cycle arrest at 14 hpf", "GSM8327210", "GSM8327210: Reference experiment  14 hpf 24 hpf biological replicate 2 and 3  technical replicate 1; Danio rerio; OTHER", "GSM8327210 r1", "GSM8327210", "1", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", null, "OTHER", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "NextSeq 500", null, "SRP513754", null, null, "ref_exp_brep2_3_trep1_S0_L003_R1_001.fastq.gz ref_exp_brep2_3_trep1_S0_L003_R2_001.fastq.gz ref_exp_brep2_3_trep1_S0_L003_R3_001.fastq.gz ref_exp_brep2_3_trep1_S0_L003_R4_001.fastq.gz", "fastq fastq fastq fastq", 10620575238.0, 116709618.0, "GSM8327210 r3", "0:61 1:8 2:8 3:14", "A:1967500221;C:1452601318;G:1411877165;T:2286950505;N:357489", 61, 8, 8, 14, 1967500221, 1452601318, 1411877165, 2286950505, 357489, "SRX24912661", "SRS21618596", "SRA1898111", "Harvard University", "Harvard University", null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, "B", null, "usable mapping rate", "illumina", "nextseq", "unknown", "other", "trueseq", "sc", "single_cell_droplet", "indrops", null, "United States", "2024-06-13", "Multi-stage", "Embryo", "Whole Organism", "All anatomical structures"], [32776, "SRR29398915", "SRX24912661", "SRS21618596", "SRP513754", "PRJNA1123686", "Cell state transitions are decoupled from cell division during early embryo development [I]", "GSE269784", "Other", "As tissues develop  cells divide and differentiate concurrently. Conflicting evidence shows that cell division is either dispensable or required for formation of cell types. To determine the role of cell division in differentiation  we arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos using two independent approaches and profiled them at single cell resolution. We show that cell division is dispensable for differentiation of all embryonic tissues during initial cell type differentiation from early gastrulation to the end of segmentation. However  in the absence of cell division  differentiation slows down in some cell types  and cells exhibit global stress responses. While differentiation is robust to blocking cell division  the proportions of cells across cell states are not but show evidence of partial compensation. This work clarifies our understanding of the role of cell division in development and showcases the utility of combining embryo wide perturbations with single cell RNA sequencing to uncover the role of common biological processes across multiple tissues. Overall design: We arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos at 6 hpf using two independent approaches: a chemical approach hydroxyurea and aphidicolin  HUA and a genetic approach involving a loss of function mutation in the gene emi1 allele hi2648. We tracked differentiation dynamics using single cell RNA sequencing scRNA seq on embryos spanning 6\u201324 hpf for HUA treated and control embryos  and at 24 hpf for emi1 mutant embryos. Overall we have collected multiple replicates for control embryos ABs at 6  8  10  14  18  21 hpf and 24 hpf  for HUA treated at 8  10  14 hpf and 24 hpf and for emi1 mutants at 24 hpf.  Details about the samples can be found in the supplementary file \"sample information.txt\"", null, "pubmed:37546736", null, "Reference experiment  14 hpf 24 hpf biological replicate 2 and 3  technical replicate 1", "GSM8327210", null, "source name:whole embryo|tissue:whole embryo|treatment:1percent DMSO control and cell cycle arrest at 14 hpf|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing", "Reference experiment  14 hpf 24 hpf biological replicate 2 and 3  technical replicate 1", "Multiple samples are pooled for each sequencing run. Raw FASTQ were prepared from Illumina bcl files in a format compatible with the inDrops.py pipeline. Each nextseq run results in 16 FASTQ files 4 lanes x 4 reads per lane. For some pooled libraries  sequencing was run twice to get more UMIs per cell and hence we have deposited 16x2 = 32 raw files for those sequencing samples. The illumina library indices of different samples in a run are provided in the meta data. These can be used to demultiplex the raw file into separate libraries. The read files from an inDrops run have the following content: * R1 001.fastq.gz : contains the three prime UTR cDNA read * R2 001.fastq.gz : contains the first half of the cell barcode * R3 001.fastq.gz : contains the library index for demultiplexing libraries * R4 001.fastq.gz : contains the second half of the barcode and the UMI.  All subsequent processing steps from FASTQ files to count matrixes were performed using the custom pipeline for inDrops data analysis github.com/indrops. Single cell transcriptomes were barcoded using inDrops Klein et al  Cell 2015. Standard transcriptome RNA seq libraries were processed as reported in Zilionis et al. Nature Protocol 2016 using inDrops v3 protocol. The transcriptome libraries were sequenced on reads Illumina NextSeq 500. Libraries used standard Illumina sequencing primers and 61 cycles for Read1  14 cycles for Read2  8 cycles each for IndexRead1 and IndexRead2. Raw fastq files was processed using inDrops.py pipeline github.com/indrops/indrops. Sequenced reads were mapped to a zebrafish reference transcriptome built from the zebrafish GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 using bowtie version 1.1.143. To obtain the final counts matrix used for data analysis  total count filters were applied as described in Kukreja et. al. 2024  method section \"Single cell RNA seq Data preprocessing\" Assembly: GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 Supplementary files format and content: Raw counts tsv.gz: cell barcode  gene names  and raw counts for all cells Supplementary files format and content: Metadata metadata.csv: library identity  cell barcode  and associated metadata for all cells   time point  treatment  replicate  annotated cell state  total number of counts  etc Library strategy: inDrops v3 scRNA seq", "whole embryo", "Zebrafish embryos were arrested for cell cycle using two complementary approaches. S phase cell cycle arrest was induced using a cocktail of drugs \u2013 hydroxyurea Sigma Aldrich H8627 5G at 20 mM and aphidicolin Sigma Aldrich A0781 5MG at 150 \u00b5M concentration in 1% dimethyl sulfoxide DMSO in egg water. G2/M phase arrest was induced by crossing heterozygous emi1 wt/mut zebrafish to generate homozygous emi1 mut/mut embryos  referred as hi2648 in the manuscript. Homozygous mutants with cell cycle arrest were screened at 24 hpf as they have very clear phenotype by this time \u2013 these embryos are smaller and have bent tails and the heterozygous mutants and wildtype are indistinguishable.", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", "AB wild type strains were used for all HUA perturbation experiments. Zebrafish mutant line hi2648  a mutant for the gene emi1  was kindly gifted by Dr. Jennifer Rhodes. Embryos were developed within the ambient temperature of Zebrafish development. Time of fertilization at 28.5 C was used to stage each clutch and this was confirmed using morphological features of the embryos. All zebrafish were housed in a facility overseen by the Harvard Medical Area Standing Committee on Animals our IACUC which performs regular inspections and under which we have an approved protocol for all animal procedures.", "tissue:whole embryo|treatment:1percent DMSO control and cell cycle arrest at 14 hpf", "GSM8327210", "GSM8327210: Reference experiment  14 hpf 24 hpf biological replicate 2 and 3  technical replicate 1; Danio rerio; OTHER", "GSM8327210 r1", "GSM8327210", "1", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", null, "OTHER", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "NextSeq 500", null, "SRP513754", null, null, "ref_exp_brep2_3_trep1_S0_L004_R1_001.fastq.gz ref_exp_brep2_3_trep1_S0_L004_R2_001.fastq.gz ref_exp_brep2_3_trep1_S0_L004_R3_001.fastq.gz ref_exp_brep2_3_trep1_S0_L004_R4_001.fastq.gz", "fastq fastq fastq fastq", 10584222740.0, 116310140.0, "GSM8327210 r4", "0:61 1:8 2:8 3:14", "A:1960717782;C:1446116581;G:1405414187;T:2282206014;N:463976", 61, 8, 8, 14, 1960717782, 1446116581, 1405414187, 2282206014, 463976, "SRX24912661", "SRS21618596", "SRA1898111", "Harvard University", "Harvard University", null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, "B", null, "usable mapping rate", "illumina", "nextseq", "unknown", "other", "trueseq", "sc", "single_cell_droplet", "indrops", null, "United States", "2024-06-13", "Multi-stage", "Embryo", "Whole Organism", "All anatomical structures"], [32777, "SRR29398916", "SRX24912660", "SRS21618594", "SRP513754", "PRJNA1123686", "Cell state transitions are decoupled from cell division during early embryo development [I]", "GSE269784", "Other", "As tissues develop  cells divide and differentiate concurrently. Conflicting evidence shows that cell division is either dispensable or required for formation of cell types. To determine the role of cell division in differentiation  we arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos using two independent approaches and profiled them at single cell resolution. We show that cell division is dispensable for differentiation of all embryonic tissues during initial cell type differentiation from early gastrulation to the end of segmentation. However  in the absence of cell division  differentiation slows down in some cell types  and cells exhibit global stress responses. While differentiation is robust to blocking cell division  the proportions of cells across cell states are not but show evidence of partial compensation. This work clarifies our understanding of the role of cell division in development and showcases the utility of combining embryo wide perturbations with single cell RNA sequencing to uncover the role of common biological processes across multiple tissues. Overall design: We arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos at 6 hpf using two independent approaches: a chemical approach hydroxyurea and aphidicolin  HUA and a genetic approach involving a loss of function mutation in the gene emi1 allele hi2648. We tracked differentiation dynamics using single cell RNA sequencing scRNA seq on embryos spanning 6\u201324 hpf for HUA treated and control embryos  and at 24 hpf for emi1 mutant embryos. Overall we have collected multiple replicates for control embryos ABs at 6  8  10  14  18  21 hpf and 24 hpf  for HUA treated at 8  10  14 hpf and 24 hpf and for emi1 mutants at 24 hpf.  Details about the samples can be found in the supplementary file \"sample information.txt\"", null, "pubmed:37546736", null, "Reference experiment  14 hpf 24 hpf biological replicate 1  technical replicate 1", "GSM8327209", null, "source name:whole embryo|tissue:whole embryo|treatment:1percent DMSO control and cell cycle arrest at 14 hpf|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing", "Reference experiment  14 hpf 24 hpf biological replicate 1  technical replicate 1", "Multiple samples are pooled for each sequencing run. Raw FASTQ were prepared from Illumina bcl files in a format compatible with the inDrops.py pipeline. Each nextseq run results in 16 FASTQ files 4 lanes x 4 reads per lane. For some pooled libraries  sequencing was run twice to get more UMIs per cell and hence we have deposited 16x2 = 32 raw files for those sequencing samples. The illumina library indices of different samples in a run are provided in the meta data. These can be used to demultiplex the raw file into separate libraries. The read files from an inDrops run have the following content: * R1 001.fastq.gz : contains the three prime UTR cDNA read * R2 001.fastq.gz : contains the first half of the cell barcode * R3 001.fastq.gz : contains the library index for demultiplexing libraries * R4 001.fastq.gz : contains the second half of the barcode and the UMI.  All subsequent processing steps from FASTQ files to count matrixes were performed using the custom pipeline for inDrops data analysis github.com/indrops. Single cell transcriptomes were barcoded using inDrops Klein et al  Cell 2015. Standard transcriptome RNA seq libraries were processed as reported in Zilionis et al. Nature Protocol 2016 using inDrops v3 protocol. The transcriptome libraries were sequenced on reads Illumina NextSeq 500. Libraries used standard Illumina sequencing primers and 61 cycles for Read1  14 cycles for Read2  8 cycles each for IndexRead1 and IndexRead2. Raw fastq files was processed using inDrops.py pipeline github.com/indrops/indrops. Sequenced reads were mapped to a zebrafish reference transcriptome built from the zebrafish GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 using bowtie version 1.1.143. To obtain the final counts matrix used for data analysis  total count filters were applied as described in Kukreja et. al. 2024  method section \"Single cell RNA seq Data preprocessing\" Assembly: GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 Supplementary files format and content: Raw counts tsv.gz: cell barcode  gene names  and raw counts for all cells Supplementary files format and content: Metadata metadata.csv: library identity  cell barcode  and associated metadata for all cells   time point  treatment  replicate  annotated cell state  total number of counts  etc Library strategy: inDrops v3 scRNA seq", "whole embryo", "Zebrafish embryos were arrested for cell cycle using two complementary approaches. S phase cell cycle arrest was induced using a cocktail of drugs \u2013 hydroxyurea Sigma Aldrich H8627 5G at 20 mM and aphidicolin Sigma Aldrich A0781 5MG at 150 \u00b5M concentration in 1% dimethyl sulfoxide DMSO in egg water. G2/M phase arrest was induced by crossing heterozygous emi1 wt/mut zebrafish to generate homozygous emi1 mut/mut embryos  referred as hi2648 in the manuscript. Homozygous mutants with cell cycle arrest were screened at 24 hpf as they have very clear phenotype by this time \u2013 these embryos are smaller and have bent tails and the heterozygous mutants and wildtype are indistinguishable.", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", "AB wild type strains were used for all HUA perturbation experiments. Zebrafish mutant line hi2648  a mutant for the gene emi1  was kindly gifted by Dr. Jennifer Rhodes. Embryos were developed within the ambient temperature of Zebrafish development. Time of fertilization at 28.5 C was used to stage each clutch and this was confirmed using morphological features of the embryos. All zebrafish were housed in a facility overseen by the Harvard Medical Area Standing Committee on Animals our IACUC which performs regular inspections and under which we have an approved protocol for all animal procedures.", "tissue:whole embryo|treatment:1percent DMSO control and cell cycle arrest at 14 hpf", "GSM8327209", "GSM8327209: Reference experiment  14 hpf 24 hpf biological replicate 1  technical replicate 1; Danio rerio; OTHER", "GSM8327209 r1", "GSM8327209", "1", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", null, "OTHER", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "NextSeq 500", null, "SRP513754", null, null, "ref_exp_brep1_trep1_S0_L001_R1_001.fastq.gz ref_exp_brep1_trep1_S0_L001_R2_001.fastq.gz ref_exp_brep1_trep1_S0_L001_R3_001.fastq.gz ref_exp_brep1_trep1_S0_L001_R4_001.fastq.gz", "fastq fastq fastq fastq", 12138066031.0, 133385341.0, "GSM8327209 r1", "0:61 1:8 2:8 3:14", "A:2284023815;C:1627684270;G:1586353604;T:2638230442;N:213670", 61, 8, 8, 14, 2284023815, 1627684270, 1586353604, 2638230442, 213670, "SRX24912660", "SRS21618594", "SRA1898111", "Harvard University", "Harvard University", null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, "B", null, "usable mapping rate", "illumina", "nextseq", "unknown", "other", "trueseq", "sc", "single_cell_droplet", "indrops", null, "United States", "2024-06-13", "Multi-stage", "Embryo", "Whole Organism", "All anatomical structures"], [32778, "SRR29398917", "SRX24912660", "SRS21618594", "SRP513754", "PRJNA1123686", "Cell state transitions are decoupled from cell division during early embryo development [I]", "GSE269784", "Other", "As tissues develop  cells divide and differentiate concurrently. Conflicting evidence shows that cell division is either dispensable or required for formation of cell types. To determine the role of cell division in differentiation  we arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos using two independent approaches and profiled them at single cell resolution. We show that cell division is dispensable for differentiation of all embryonic tissues during initial cell type differentiation from early gastrulation to the end of segmentation. However  in the absence of cell division  differentiation slows down in some cell types  and cells exhibit global stress responses. While differentiation is robust to blocking cell division  the proportions of cells across cell states are not but show evidence of partial compensation. This work clarifies our understanding of the role of cell division in development and showcases the utility of combining embryo wide perturbations with single cell RNA sequencing to uncover the role of common biological processes across multiple tissues. Overall design: We arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos at 6 hpf using two independent approaches: a chemical approach hydroxyurea and aphidicolin  HUA and a genetic approach involving a loss of function mutation in the gene emi1 allele hi2648. We tracked differentiation dynamics using single cell RNA sequencing scRNA seq on embryos spanning 6\u201324 hpf for HUA treated and control embryos  and at 24 hpf for emi1 mutant embryos. Overall we have collected multiple replicates for control embryos ABs at 6  8  10  14  18  21 hpf and 24 hpf  for HUA treated at 8  10  14 hpf and 24 hpf and for emi1 mutants at 24 hpf.  Details about the samples can be found in the supplementary file \"sample information.txt\"", null, "pubmed:37546736", null, "Reference experiment  14 hpf 24 hpf biological replicate 1  technical replicate 1", "GSM8327209", null, "source name:whole embryo|tissue:whole embryo|treatment:1percent DMSO control and cell cycle arrest at 14 hpf|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing", "Reference experiment  14 hpf 24 hpf biological replicate 1  technical replicate 1", "Multiple samples are pooled for each sequencing run. Raw FASTQ were prepared from Illumina bcl files in a format compatible with the inDrops.py pipeline. Each nextseq run results in 16 FASTQ files 4 lanes x 4 reads per lane. For some pooled libraries  sequencing was run twice to get more UMIs per cell and hence we have deposited 16x2 = 32 raw files for those sequencing samples. The illumina library indices of different samples in a run are provided in the meta data. These can be used to demultiplex the raw file into separate libraries. The read files from an inDrops run have the following content: * R1 001.fastq.gz : contains the three prime UTR cDNA read * R2 001.fastq.gz : contains the first half of the cell barcode * R3 001.fastq.gz : contains the library index for demultiplexing libraries * R4 001.fastq.gz : contains the second half of the barcode and the UMI.  All subsequent processing steps from FASTQ files to count matrixes were performed using the custom pipeline for inDrops data analysis github.com/indrops. Single cell transcriptomes were barcoded using inDrops Klein et al  Cell 2015. Standard transcriptome RNA seq libraries were processed as reported in Zilionis et al. Nature Protocol 2016 using inDrops v3 protocol. The transcriptome libraries were sequenced on reads Illumina NextSeq 500. Libraries used standard Illumina sequencing primers and 61 cycles for Read1  14 cycles for Read2  8 cycles each for IndexRead1 and IndexRead2. Raw fastq files was processed using inDrops.py pipeline github.com/indrops/indrops. Sequenced reads were mapped to a zebrafish reference transcriptome built from the zebrafish GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 using bowtie version 1.1.143. To obtain the final counts matrix used for data analysis  total count filters were applied as described in Kukreja et. al. 2024  method section \"Single cell RNA seq Data preprocessing\" Assembly: GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 Supplementary files format and content: Raw counts tsv.gz: cell barcode  gene names  and raw counts for all cells Supplementary files format and content: Metadata metadata.csv: library identity  cell barcode  and associated metadata for all cells   time point  treatment  replicate  annotated cell state  total number of counts  etc Library strategy: inDrops v3 scRNA seq", "whole embryo", "Zebrafish embryos were arrested for cell cycle using two complementary approaches. S phase cell cycle arrest was induced using a cocktail of drugs \u2013 hydroxyurea Sigma Aldrich H8627 5G at 20 mM and aphidicolin Sigma Aldrich A0781 5MG at 150 \u00b5M concentration in 1% dimethyl sulfoxide DMSO in egg water. G2/M phase arrest was induced by crossing heterozygous emi1 wt/mut zebrafish to generate homozygous emi1 mut/mut embryos  referred as hi2648 in the manuscript. Homozygous mutants with cell cycle arrest were screened at 24 hpf as they have very clear phenotype by this time \u2013 these embryos are smaller and have bent tails and the heterozygous mutants and wildtype are indistinguishable.", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", "AB wild type strains were used for all HUA perturbation experiments. Zebrafish mutant line hi2648  a mutant for the gene emi1  was kindly gifted by Dr. Jennifer Rhodes. Embryos were developed within the ambient temperature of Zebrafish development. Time of fertilization at 28.5 C was used to stage each clutch and this was confirmed using morphological features of the embryos. All zebrafish were housed in a facility overseen by the Harvard Medical Area Standing Committee on Animals our IACUC which performs regular inspections and under which we have an approved protocol for all animal procedures.", "tissue:whole embryo|treatment:1percent DMSO control and cell cycle arrest at 14 hpf", "GSM8327209", "GSM8327209: Reference experiment  14 hpf 24 hpf biological replicate 1  technical replicate 1; Danio rerio; OTHER", "GSM8327209 r1", "GSM8327209", "1", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", null, "OTHER", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "NextSeq 500", null, "SRP513754", null, null, "ref_exp_brep1_trep1_S0_L002_R1_001.fastq.gz ref_exp_brep1_trep1_S0_L002_R2_001.fastq.gz ref_exp_brep1_trep1_S0_L002_R3_001.fastq.gz ref_exp_brep1_trep1_S0_L002_R4_001.fastq.gz", "fastq fastq fastq fastq", 12243894572.0, 134548292.0, "GSM8327209 r2", "0:61 1:8 2:8 3:14", "A:2304388773;C:1639987412;G:1597880933;T:2665024548;N:164146", 61, 8, 8, 14, 2304388773, 1639987412, 1597880933, 2665024548, 164146, "SRX24912660", "SRS21618594", "SRA1898111", "Harvard University", "Harvard University", null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, "B", null, "usable mapping rate", "illumina", "nextseq", "unknown", "other", "trueseq", "sc", "single_cell_droplet", "indrops", null, "United States", "2024-06-13", "Multi-stage", "Embryo", "Whole Organism", "All anatomical structures"], [32779, "SRR29398918", "SRX24912660", "SRS21618594", "SRP513754", "PRJNA1123686", "Cell state transitions are decoupled from cell division during early embryo development [I]", "GSE269784", "Other", "As tissues develop  cells divide and differentiate concurrently. Conflicting evidence shows that cell division is either dispensable or required for formation of cell types. To determine the role of cell division in differentiation  we arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos using two independent approaches and profiled them at single cell resolution. We show that cell division is dispensable for differentiation of all embryonic tissues during initial cell type differentiation from early gastrulation to the end of segmentation. However  in the absence of cell division  differentiation slows down in some cell types  and cells exhibit global stress responses. While differentiation is robust to blocking cell division  the proportions of cells across cell states are not but show evidence of partial compensation. This work clarifies our understanding of the role of cell division in development and showcases the utility of combining embryo wide perturbations with single cell RNA sequencing to uncover the role of common biological processes across multiple tissues. Overall design: We arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos at 6 hpf using two independent approaches: a chemical approach hydroxyurea and aphidicolin  HUA and a genetic approach involving a loss of function mutation in the gene emi1 allele hi2648. We tracked differentiation dynamics using single cell RNA sequencing scRNA seq on embryos spanning 6\u201324 hpf for HUA treated and control embryos  and at 24 hpf for emi1 mutant embryos. Overall we have collected multiple replicates for control embryos ABs at 6  8  10  14  18  21 hpf and 24 hpf  for HUA treated at 8  10  14 hpf and 24 hpf and for emi1 mutants at 24 hpf.  Details about the samples can be found in the supplementary file \"sample information.txt\"", null, "pubmed:37546736", null, "Reference experiment  14 hpf 24 hpf biological replicate 1  technical replicate 1", "GSM8327209", null, "source name:whole embryo|tissue:whole embryo|treatment:1percent DMSO control and cell cycle arrest at 14 hpf|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing", "Reference experiment  14 hpf 24 hpf biological replicate 1  technical replicate 1", "Multiple samples are pooled for each sequencing run. Raw FASTQ were prepared from Illumina bcl files in a format compatible with the inDrops.py pipeline. Each nextseq run results in 16 FASTQ files 4 lanes x 4 reads per lane. For some pooled libraries  sequencing was run twice to get more UMIs per cell and hence we have deposited 16x2 = 32 raw files for those sequencing samples. The illumina library indices of different samples in a run are provided in the meta data. These can be used to demultiplex the raw file into separate libraries. The read files from an inDrops run have the following content: * R1 001.fastq.gz : contains the three prime UTR cDNA read * R2 001.fastq.gz : contains the first half of the cell barcode * R3 001.fastq.gz : contains the library index for demultiplexing libraries * R4 001.fastq.gz : contains the second half of the barcode and the UMI.  All subsequent processing steps from FASTQ files to count matrixes were performed using the custom pipeline for inDrops data analysis github.com/indrops. Single cell transcriptomes were barcoded using inDrops Klein et al  Cell 2015. Standard transcriptome RNA seq libraries were processed as reported in Zilionis et al. Nature Protocol 2016 using inDrops v3 protocol. The transcriptome libraries were sequenced on reads Illumina NextSeq 500. Libraries used standard Illumina sequencing primers and 61 cycles for Read1  14 cycles for Read2  8 cycles each for IndexRead1 and IndexRead2. Raw fastq files was processed using inDrops.py pipeline github.com/indrops/indrops. Sequenced reads were mapped to a zebrafish reference transcriptome built from the zebrafish GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 using bowtie version 1.1.143. To obtain the final counts matrix used for data analysis  total count filters were applied as described in Kukreja et. al. 2024  method section \"Single cell RNA seq Data preprocessing\" Assembly: GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 Supplementary files format and content: Raw counts tsv.gz: cell barcode  gene names  and raw counts for all cells Supplementary files format and content: Metadata metadata.csv: library identity  cell barcode  and associated metadata for all cells   time point  treatment  replicate  annotated cell state  total number of counts  etc Library strategy: inDrops v3 scRNA seq", "whole embryo", "Zebrafish embryos were arrested for cell cycle using two complementary approaches. S phase cell cycle arrest was induced using a cocktail of drugs \u2013 hydroxyurea Sigma Aldrich H8627 5G at 20 mM and aphidicolin Sigma Aldrich A0781 5MG at 150 \u00b5M concentration in 1% dimethyl sulfoxide DMSO in egg water. G2/M phase arrest was induced by crossing heterozygous emi1 wt/mut zebrafish to generate homozygous emi1 mut/mut embryos  referred as hi2648 in the manuscript. Homozygous mutants with cell cycle arrest were screened at 24 hpf as they have very clear phenotype by this time \u2013 these embryos are smaller and have bent tails and the heterozygous mutants and wildtype are indistinguishable.", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", "AB wild type strains were used for all HUA perturbation experiments. Zebrafish mutant line hi2648  a mutant for the gene emi1  was kindly gifted by Dr. Jennifer Rhodes. Embryos were developed within the ambient temperature of Zebrafish development. Time of fertilization at 28.5 C was used to stage each clutch and this was confirmed using morphological features of the embryos. All zebrafish were housed in a facility overseen by the Harvard Medical Area Standing Committee on Animals our IACUC which performs regular inspections and under which we have an approved protocol for all animal procedures.", "tissue:whole embryo|treatment:1percent DMSO control and cell cycle arrest at 14 hpf", "GSM8327209", "GSM8327209: Reference experiment  14 hpf 24 hpf biological replicate 1  technical replicate 1; Danio rerio; OTHER", "GSM8327209 r1", "GSM8327209", "1", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", null, "OTHER", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "NextSeq 500", null, "SRP513754", null, null, "ref_exp_brep1_trep1_S0_L003_R1_001.fastq.gz ref_exp_brep1_trep1_S0_L003_R2_001.fastq.gz ref_exp_brep1_trep1_S0_L003_R3_001.fastq.gz ref_exp_brep1_trep1_S0_L003_R4_001.fastq.gz", "fastq fastq fastq fastq", 12131674828.0, 133315108.0, "GSM8327209 r3", "0:61 1:8 2:8 3:14", "A:2285180187;C:1620399775;G:1589956627;T:2636408789;N:276210", 61, 8, 8, 14, 2285180187, 1620399775, 1589956627, 2636408789, 276210, "SRX24912660", "SRS21618594", "SRA1898111", "Harvard University", "Harvard University", null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, "B", null, "usable mapping rate", "illumina", "nextseq", "unknown", "other", "trueseq", "sc", "single_cell_droplet", "indrops", null, "United States", "2024-06-13", "Multi-stage", "Embryo", "Whole Organism", "All anatomical structures"], [32780, "SRR29398919", "SRX24912660", "SRS21618594", "SRP513754", "PRJNA1123686", "Cell state transitions are decoupled from cell division during early embryo development [I]", "GSE269784", "Other", "As tissues develop  cells divide and differentiate concurrently. Conflicting evidence shows that cell division is either dispensable or required for formation of cell types. To determine the role of cell division in differentiation  we arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos using two independent approaches and profiled them at single cell resolution. We show that cell division is dispensable for differentiation of all embryonic tissues during initial cell type differentiation from early gastrulation to the end of segmentation. However  in the absence of cell division  differentiation slows down in some cell types  and cells exhibit global stress responses. While differentiation is robust to blocking cell division  the proportions of cells across cell states are not but show evidence of partial compensation. This work clarifies our understanding of the role of cell division in development and showcases the utility of combining embryo wide perturbations with single cell RNA sequencing to uncover the role of common biological processes across multiple tissues. Overall design: We arrested the cell cycle in zebrafish embryos at 6 hpf using two independent approaches: a chemical approach hydroxyurea and aphidicolin  HUA and a genetic approach involving a loss of function mutation in the gene emi1 allele hi2648. We tracked differentiation dynamics using single cell RNA sequencing scRNA seq on embryos spanning 6\u201324 hpf for HUA treated and control embryos  and at 24 hpf for emi1 mutant embryos. Overall we have collected multiple replicates for control embryos ABs at 6  8  10  14  18  21 hpf and 24 hpf  for HUA treated at 8  10  14 hpf and 24 hpf and for emi1 mutants at 24 hpf.  Details about the samples can be found in the supplementary file \"sample information.txt\"", null, "pubmed:37546736", null, "Reference experiment  14 hpf 24 hpf biological replicate 1  technical replicate 1", "GSM8327209", null, "source name:whole embryo|tissue:whole embryo|treatment:1percent DMSO control and cell cycle arrest at 14 hpf|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing", "Reference experiment  14 hpf 24 hpf biological replicate 1  technical replicate 1", "Multiple samples are pooled for each sequencing run. Raw FASTQ were prepared from Illumina bcl files in a format compatible with the inDrops.py pipeline. Each nextseq run results in 16 FASTQ files 4 lanes x 4 reads per lane. For some pooled libraries  sequencing was run twice to get more UMIs per cell and hence we have deposited 16x2 = 32 raw files for those sequencing samples. The illumina library indices of different samples in a run are provided in the meta data. These can be used to demultiplex the raw file into separate libraries. The read files from an inDrops run have the following content: * R1 001.fastq.gz : contains the three prime UTR cDNA read * R2 001.fastq.gz : contains the first half of the cell barcode * R3 001.fastq.gz : contains the library index for demultiplexing libraries * R4 001.fastq.gz : contains the second half of the barcode and the UMI.  All subsequent processing steps from FASTQ files to count matrixes were performed using the custom pipeline for inDrops data analysis github.com/indrops. Single cell transcriptomes were barcoded using inDrops Klein et al  Cell 2015. Standard transcriptome RNA seq libraries were processed as reported in Zilionis et al. Nature Protocol 2016 using inDrops v3 protocol. The transcriptome libraries were sequenced on reads Illumina NextSeq 500. Libraries used standard Illumina sequencing primers and 61 cycles for Read1  14 cycles for Read2  8 cycles each for IndexRead1 and IndexRead2. Raw fastq files was processed using inDrops.py pipeline github.com/indrops/indrops. Sequenced reads were mapped to a zebrafish reference transcriptome built from the zebrafish GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 using bowtie version 1.1.143. To obtain the final counts matrix used for data analysis  total count filters were applied as described in Kukreja et. al. 2024  method section \"Single cell RNA seq Data preprocessing\" Assembly: GRCz10 genome assembly Assembly Accession: GCF 000002035.5 Supplementary files format and content: Raw counts tsv.gz: cell barcode  gene names  and raw counts for all cells Supplementary files format and content: Metadata metadata.csv: library identity  cell barcode  and associated metadata for all cells   time point  treatment  replicate  annotated cell state  total number of counts  etc Library strategy: inDrops v3 scRNA seq", "whole embryo", "Zebrafish embryos were arrested for cell cycle using two complementary approaches. S phase cell cycle arrest was induced using a cocktail of drugs \u2013 hydroxyurea Sigma Aldrich H8627 5G at 20 mM and aphidicolin Sigma Aldrich A0781 5MG at 150 \u00b5M concentration in 1% dimethyl sulfoxide DMSO in egg water. G2/M phase arrest was induced by crossing heterozygous emi1 wt/mut zebrafish to generate homozygous emi1 mut/mut embryos  referred as hi2648 in the manuscript. Homozygous mutants with cell cycle arrest were screened at 24 hpf as they have very clear phenotype by this time \u2013 these embryos are smaller and have bent tails and the heterozygous mutants and wildtype are indistinguishable.", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", "AB wild type strains were used for all HUA perturbation experiments. Zebrafish mutant line hi2648  a mutant for the gene emi1  was kindly gifted by Dr. Jennifer Rhodes. Embryos were developed within the ambient temperature of Zebrafish development. Time of fertilization at 28.5 C was used to stage each clutch and this was confirmed using morphological features of the embryos. All zebrafish were housed in a facility overseen by the Harvard Medical Area Standing Committee on Animals our IACUC which performs regular inspections and under which we have an approved protocol for all animal procedures.", "tissue:whole embryo|treatment:1percent DMSO control and cell cycle arrest at 14 hpf", "GSM8327209", "GSM8327209: Reference experiment  14 hpf 24 hpf biological replicate 1  technical replicate 1; Danio rerio; OTHER", "GSM8327209 r1", "GSM8327209", "1", "Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated using 1mg/mL Pronase Sigma P5147 1G for 5 7 minutes followed by washing in egg water. Embryos were dissociated as previously described in Wagner et. al. Science 2018. Briefly  embryos were dissociated in 0.5mL LoBind microcentrifuge tubes that had been precoated with 10% w/v BSA for about 15 minutes at room temperature. They were homogenized in 1XDPBS/1% w/v BSA for 6 hpf to 10 hpf embryos early time points and in 500 \u00b5L FACSmax cell dissociation solution Genlantis T200100 for 14 hpf to 24 hpf embryos late time points. Cells were then filtered through a 40\u00b5m cell strainer mesh Fisher 352340 and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 200g for 1 minute early time points or 300g for 5 minutes late time points. Cells were then washed in 1XDPBS/1%BSA using the same centrifuge settings. They were then resuspended in 1XDPBS/0.5%BSA/18% optiprep density medium Sigma D1556 250ML. Cell concentration was manually quantified using hemocytometer and adjusted to a final concentration of 100 000 cells/mL before encapsulation. Library construction as detailed in Zilionis  R. et al. 2016 Nature Protocols. Single cell barcoding and sequencing was done using droplet microfluidics also described in the same paper.", null, "OTHER", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "NextSeq 500", null, "SRP513754", null, null, "ref_exp_brep1_trep1_S0_L004_R1_001.fastq.gz ref_exp_brep1_trep1_S0_L004_R2_001.fastq.gz ref_exp_brep1_trep1_S0_L004_R3_001.fastq.gz ref_exp_brep1_trep1_S0_L004_R4_001.fastq.gz", "fastq fastq fastq fastq", 12104206569.0, 133013259.0, "GSM8327209 r4", "0:61 1:8 2:8 3:14", "A:2280991287;C:1619017132;G:1586873006;T:2626722786;N:204588", 61, 8, 8, 14, 2280991287, 1619017132, 1586873006, 2626722786, 204588, "SRX24912660", "SRS21618594", "SRA1898111", "Harvard University", "Harvard University", null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, "B", null, "usable mapping rate", "illumina", "nextseq", "unknown", "other", "trueseq", "sc", "single_cell_droplet", "indrops", null, "United States", "2024-06-13", "Multi-stage", "Embryo", "Whole Organism", "All anatomical structures"], [33990, "SRR31030860", "SRX26416598", "SRS22936450", "SRP539182", "PRJNA1174121", "Quantification of subcellular RNA localization through direct detection of RNA oxidation", "GSE279714", "Other", "Across cell types and organisms  thousands of RNAs display asymmetric subcellular distributions. The study of this process often requires quantifying abundances of specific RNAs at precise subcellular locations. To analyze subcellular transcriptomes  multiple proximity based techniques have been developed in which RNAs near a localized bait protein are specifically labeled  facilitating their biotinylation and purification. However  these complex methods are often laborious and require expensive enrichment reagents. To streamline the analysis of localized RNA populations  we developed Oxidation Induced Nucleotide Conversion sequencing OINC seq. In OINC seq  RNAs near a genetically encoded  localized bait protein are specifically oxidized in a photo controllable manner. These oxidation events are then directly detected and quantified using high throughput sequencing and our software package  PIGPEN  without xxx need for biotin mediated enrichment. We demonstrate that OINC seq can induce and quantify RNA oxidation with high specificity in a dose  and light dependent manner. We further show the spatial specificity of OINC seq by using it to quantify subcellular transcriptomes associated with the cytoplasm  ER  and the inner and outer membranes of mitochondria. Finally  using transgenic zebrafish  we demonstrate that OINC seq allows proximity mediated RNA labeling in live animals. In sum  OINC seq together with PIGPEN provide an accessible workflow for the analysis of localized RNAs across different biological systems. Overall design: Cells and tissues were treated with and without xxx that drive localized RNA oxidation at a variety of subcellular locations  including treatment with the singlet oxygen producer Halo DBF and treatment with green light to activate Halo DBF. The extent of oxidation was then calculated at the gene level using PIGPEN software.", null, "pubmed:39605352;pubmed:40037712", null, "ZF NES GAPDH Rep4 minus", "GSM8578751", null, "source name:2 dpf embryos|tissue:2 dpf embryos|genotype:Halo NES|treatment:minus DBF|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing", "ZF NES GAPDH Rep4 minus", "OINC seq Oxidation Induced Nucleotide Conversion sequencing Adapters were trimmed from reads using Cutadapt. RNA oxidation events as seen as mutations were quantified using PIGPEN https://github.com/TaliaferroLab/OINC seq Assembly: hg38 and GRCz11 Supplementary files format and content: Quantification of mutations in RNAseq data produced by PIGPEN.", "2 dpf embryos", null, "RNA was extracted using Trizol and DNase treated for 30 min at 37C. Single amplicon libraries were constructed using gene specific RT PCR. Whole transcriptome libraries were created using Lexogen Quantseq library kits.", "HeLa cells were cultured in DMEM + pen/strep + 10% FBS. Zebrafish embryos were incubated at 28.5C in E3 medium.", "tissue:2 dpf embryos|genotype:Halo NES|treatment:minus DBF", "GSM8578751", "GSM8578751: ZF NES GAPDH Rep4 minus; Danio rerio; OTHER", "GSM8578751 r1", "GSM8578751", "1", "RNA was extracted using Trizol and DNase treated for 30 min at 37C. Single amplicon libraries were constructed using gene specific RT PCR. Whole transcriptome libraries were created using Lexogen Quantseq library kits.", null, "OTHER", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "Illumina NovaSeq 6000", null, "SRP539182", null, null, "ZF_NES_GAPDH_Rep4_minus.R1.fq.gz ZF_NES_GAPDH_Rep4_minus.R2.fq.gz", "fastq fastq", 1100578200.0, 3668594.0, "GSM8578751 r1", "0:150 1:150", "A:287878221;C:249390946;G:265835736;T:297454600;N:18697", 150, 150, null, null, 287878221, 249390946, 265835736, 297454600, 18697, "SRX26416598", "SRS22936450", "SRA1993027", "Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus", "Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus", null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, "B", "B", "biological fallback assumption", "illumina", "novaseq_era", "full_length", "random_priming", "lexogen", "bulk", "unknown", "unknown", null, "United States", "2024-10-17", "Hatching", "Embryo", "Embryo Imprecise", "All anatomical structures"], [33991, "SRR31030861", "SRX26416597", "SRS22936451", "SRP539182", "PRJNA1174121", "Quantification of subcellular RNA localization through direct detection of RNA oxidation", "GSE279714", "Other", "Across cell types and organisms  thousands of RNAs display asymmetric subcellular distributions. The study of this process often requires quantifying abundances of specific RNAs at precise subcellular locations. To analyze subcellular transcriptomes  multiple proximity based techniques have been developed in which RNAs near a localized bait protein are specifically labeled  facilitating their biotinylation and purification. However  these complex methods are often laborious and require expensive enrichment reagents. To streamline the analysis of localized RNA populations  we developed Oxidation Induced Nucleotide Conversion sequencing OINC seq. In OINC seq  RNAs near a genetically encoded  localized bait protein are specifically oxidized in a photo controllable manner. These oxidation events are then directly detected and quantified using high throughput sequencing and our software package  PIGPEN  without xxx need for biotin mediated enrichment. We demonstrate that OINC seq can induce and quantify RNA oxidation with high specificity in a dose  and light dependent manner. We further show the spatial specificity of OINC seq by using it to quantify subcellular transcriptomes associated with the cytoplasm  ER  and the inner and outer membranes of mitochondria. Finally  using transgenic zebrafish  we demonstrate that OINC seq allows proximity mediated RNA labeling in live animals. In sum  OINC seq together with PIGPEN provide an accessible workflow for the analysis of localized RNAs across different biological systems. Overall design: Cells and tissues were treated with and without xxx that drive localized RNA oxidation at a variety of subcellular locations  including treatment with the singlet oxygen producer Halo DBF and treatment with green light to activate Halo DBF. The extent of oxidation was then calculated at the gene level using PIGPEN software.", null, "pubmed:39605352;pubmed:40037712", null, "ZF NES GAPDH Rep3 plus", "GSM8578750", null, "source name:2 dpf embryos|tissue:2 dpf embryos|genotype:Halo NES|treatment:plus DBF|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing", "ZF NES GAPDH Rep3 plus", "OINC seq Oxidation Induced Nucleotide Conversion sequencing Adapters were trimmed from reads using Cutadapt. RNA oxidation events as seen as mutations were quantified using PIGPEN https://github.com/TaliaferroLab/OINC seq Assembly: hg38 and GRCz11 Supplementary files format and content: Quantification of mutations in RNAseq data produced by PIGPEN.", "2 dpf embryos", null, "RNA was extracted using Trizol and DNase treated for 30 min at 37C. Single amplicon libraries were constructed using gene specific RT PCR. Whole transcriptome libraries were created using Lexogen Quantseq library kits.", "HeLa cells were cultured in DMEM + pen/strep + 10% FBS. Zebrafish embryos were incubated at 28.5C in E3 medium.", "tissue:2 dpf embryos|genotype:Halo NES|treatment:plus DBF", "GSM8578750", "GSM8578750: ZF NES GAPDH Rep3 plus; Danio rerio; OTHER", "GSM8578750 r1", "GSM8578750", "1", "RNA was extracted using Trizol and DNase treated for 30 min at 37C. Single amplicon libraries were constructed using gene specific RT PCR. Whole transcriptome libraries were created using Lexogen Quantseq library kits.", null, "OTHER", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "Illumina NovaSeq 6000", null, "SRP539182", null, null, "ZF_NES_GAPDH_Rep3_plus.R1.fq.gz ZF_NES_GAPDH_Rep3_plus.R2.fq.gz", "fastq fastq", 1231779300.0, 4105931.0, "GSM8578750 r1", "0:150 1:150", "A:322256597;C:278991471;G:297394980;T:333116282;N:19970", 150, 150, null, null, 322256597, 278991471, 297394980, 333116282, 19970, "SRX26416597", "SRS22936451", "SRA1993027", "Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus", "Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus", null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, "B", "B", "biological fallback assumption", "illumina", "novaseq_era", "full_length", "random_priming", "lexogen", "bulk", "unknown", "unknown", null, "United States", "2024-10-17", "Hatching", "Embryo", "Embryo Imprecise", "All anatomical structures"], [33992, "SRR31030862", "SRX26416596", "SRS22936449", "SRP539182", "PRJNA1174121", "Quantification of subcellular RNA localization through direct detection of RNA oxidation", "GSE279714", "Other", "Across cell types and organisms  thousands of RNAs display asymmetric subcellular distributions. The study of this process often requires quantifying abundances of specific RNAs at precise subcellular locations. To analyze subcellular transcriptomes  multiple proximity based techniques have been developed in which RNAs near a localized bait protein are specifically labeled  facilitating their biotinylation and purification. However  these complex methods are often laborious and require expensive enrichment reagents. To streamline the analysis of localized RNA populations  we developed Oxidation Induced Nucleotide Conversion sequencing OINC seq. In OINC seq  RNAs near a genetically encoded  localized bait protein are specifically oxidized in a photo controllable manner. These oxidation events are then directly detected and quantified using high throughput sequencing and our software package  PIGPEN  without xxx need for biotin mediated enrichment. We demonstrate that OINC seq can induce and quantify RNA oxidation with high specificity in a dose  and light dependent manner. We further show the spatial specificity of OINC seq by using it to quantify subcellular transcriptomes associated with the cytoplasm  ER  and the inner and outer membranes of mitochondria. Finally  using transgenic zebrafish  we demonstrate that OINC seq allows proximity mediated RNA labeling in live animals. In sum  OINC seq together with PIGPEN provide an accessible workflow for the analysis of localized RNAs across different biological systems. Overall design: Cells and tissues were treated with and without xxx that drive localized RNA oxidation at a variety of subcellular locations  including treatment with the singlet oxygen producer Halo DBF and treatment with green light to activate Halo DBF. The extent of oxidation was then calculated at the gene level using PIGPEN software.", null, "pubmed:39605352;pubmed:40037712", null, "ZF NES GAPDH Rep3 minus", "GSM8578749", null, "source name:2 dpf embryos|tissue:2 dpf embryos|genotype:Halo NES|treatment:minus DBF|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing", "ZF NES GAPDH Rep3 minus", "OINC seq Oxidation Induced Nucleotide Conversion sequencing Adapters were trimmed from reads using Cutadapt. RNA oxidation events as seen as mutations were quantified using PIGPEN https://github.com/TaliaferroLab/OINC seq Assembly: hg38 and GRCz11 Supplementary files format and content: Quantification of mutations in RNAseq data produced by PIGPEN.", "2 dpf embryos", null, "RNA was extracted using Trizol and DNase treated for 30 min at 37C. Single amplicon libraries were constructed using gene specific RT PCR. Whole transcriptome libraries were created using Lexogen Quantseq library kits.", "HeLa cells were cultured in DMEM + pen/strep + 10% FBS. Zebrafish embryos were incubated at 28.5C in E3 medium.", "tissue:2 dpf embryos|genotype:Halo NES|treatment:minus DBF", "GSM8578749", "GSM8578749: ZF NES GAPDH Rep3 minus; Danio rerio; OTHER", "GSM8578749 r1", "GSM8578749", "1", "RNA was extracted using Trizol and DNase treated for 30 min at 37C. Single amplicon libraries were constructed using gene specific RT PCR. Whole transcriptome libraries were created using Lexogen Quantseq library kits.", null, "OTHER", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "Illumina NovaSeq 6000", null, "SRP539182", null, null, "ZF_NES_GAPDH_Rep3_minus.R1.fq.gz ZF_NES_GAPDH_Rep3_minus.R2.fq.gz", "fastq fastq", 1002124500.0, 3340415.0, "GSM8578749 r1", "0:150 1:150", "A:262024969;C:227163761;G:242157218;T:270761424;N:17128", 150, 150, null, null, 262024969, 227163761, 242157218, 270761424, 17128, "SRX26416596", "SRS22936449", "SRA1993027", "Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus", "Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus", null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, "B", "B", "biological fallback assumption", "illumina", "novaseq_era", "full_length", "random_priming", "lexogen", "bulk", "unknown", "unknown", null, "United States", "2024-10-17", "Hatching", "Embryo", "Embryo Imprecise", "All anatomical structures"], [33993, "SRR31030863", "SRX26416595", "SRS22936448", "SRP539182", "PRJNA1174121", "Quantification of subcellular RNA localization through direct detection of RNA oxidation", "GSE279714", "Other", "Across cell types and organisms  thousands of RNAs display asymmetric subcellular distributions. The study of this process often requires quantifying abundances of specific RNAs at precise subcellular locations. To analyze subcellular transcriptomes  multiple proximity based techniques have been developed in which RNAs near a localized bait protein are specifically labeled  facilitating their biotinylation and purification. However  these complex methods are often laborious and require expensive enrichment reagents. To streamline the analysis of localized RNA populations  we developed Oxidation Induced Nucleotide Conversion sequencing OINC seq. In OINC seq  RNAs near a genetically encoded  localized bait protein are specifically oxidized in a photo controllable manner. These oxidation events are then directly detected and quantified using high throughput sequencing and our software package  PIGPEN  without xxx need for biotin mediated enrichment. We demonstrate that OINC seq can induce and quantify RNA oxidation with high specificity in a dose  and light dependent manner. We further show the spatial specificity of OINC seq by using it to quantify subcellular transcriptomes associated with the cytoplasm  ER  and the inner and outer membranes of mitochondria. Finally  using transgenic zebrafish  we demonstrate that OINC seq allows proximity mediated RNA labeling in live animals. In sum  OINC seq together with PIGPEN provide an accessible workflow for the analysis of localized RNAs across different biological systems. Overall design: Cells and tissues were treated with and without xxx that drive localized RNA oxidation at a variety of subcellular locations  including treatment with the singlet oxygen producer Halo DBF and treatment with green light to activate Halo DBF. The extent of oxidation was then calculated at the gene level using PIGPEN software.", null, "pubmed:39605352;pubmed:40037712", null, "ZF NES GAPDH Rep2 plus", "GSM8578748", null, "source name:2 dpf embryos|tissue:2 dpf embryos|genotype:Halo NES|treatment:plus DBF|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing", "ZF NES GAPDH Rep2 plus", "OINC seq Oxidation Induced Nucleotide Conversion sequencing Adapters were trimmed from reads using Cutadapt. RNA oxidation events as seen as mutations were quantified using PIGPEN https://github.com/TaliaferroLab/OINC seq Assembly: hg38 and GRCz11 Supplementary files format and content: Quantification of mutations in RNAseq data produced by PIGPEN.", "2 dpf embryos", null, "RNA was extracted using Trizol and DNase treated for 30 min at 37C. Single amplicon libraries were constructed using gene specific RT PCR. Whole transcriptome libraries were created using Lexogen Quantseq library kits.", "HeLa cells were cultured in DMEM + pen/strep + 10% FBS. Zebrafish embryos were incubated at 28.5C in E3 medium.", "tissue:2 dpf embryos|genotype:Halo NES|treatment:plus DBF", "GSM8578748", "GSM8578748: ZF NES GAPDH Rep2 plus; Danio rerio; OTHER", "GSM8578748 r1", "GSM8578748", "1", "RNA was extracted using Trizol and DNase treated for 30 min at 37C. Single amplicon libraries were constructed using gene specific RT PCR. Whole transcriptome libraries were created using Lexogen Quantseq library kits.", null, "OTHER", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "Illumina NovaSeq 6000", null, "SRP539182", null, null, "ZF_NES_GAPDH_Rep2_plus.R1.fq.gz ZF_NES_GAPDH_Rep2_plus.R2.fq.gz", "fastq fastq", 1051565100.0, 3505217.0, "GSM8578748 r1", "0:150 1:150", "A:275784945;C:237523425;G:253300749;T:284937948;N:18033", 150, 150, null, null, 275784945, 237523425, 253300749, 284937948, 18033, "SRX26416595", "SRS22936448", "SRA1993027", "Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus", "Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus", null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, "B", "B", "biological fallback assumption", "illumina", "novaseq_era", "full_length", "random_priming", "lexogen", "bulk", "unknown", "unknown", null, "United States", "2024-10-17", "Hatching", "Embryo", "Embryo Imprecise", "All anatomical structures"], [33994, "SRR31030864", "SRX26416594", "SRS22936447", "SRP539182", "PRJNA1174121", "Quantification of subcellular RNA localization through direct detection of RNA oxidation", "GSE279714", "Other", "Across cell types and organisms  thousands of RNAs display asymmetric subcellular distributions. The study of this process often requires quantifying abundances of specific RNAs at precise subcellular locations. To analyze subcellular transcriptomes  multiple proximity based techniques have been developed in which RNAs near a localized bait protein are specifically labeled  facilitating their biotinylation and purification. However  these complex methods are often laborious and require expensive enrichment reagents. To streamline the analysis of localized RNA populations  we developed Oxidation Induced Nucleotide Conversion sequencing OINC seq. In OINC seq  RNAs near a genetically encoded  localized bait protein are specifically oxidized in a photo controllable manner. These oxidation events are then directly detected and quantified using high throughput sequencing and our software package  PIGPEN  without xxx need for biotin mediated enrichment. We demonstrate that OINC seq can induce and quantify RNA oxidation with high specificity in a dose  and light dependent manner. We further show the spatial specificity of OINC seq by using it to quantify subcellular transcriptomes associated with the cytoplasm  ER  and the inner and outer membranes of mitochondria. Finally  using transgenic zebrafish  we demonstrate that OINC seq allows proximity mediated RNA labeling in live animals. In sum  OINC seq together with PIGPEN provide an accessible workflow for the analysis of localized RNAs across different biological systems. Overall design: Cells and tissues were treated with and without xxx that drive localized RNA oxidation at a variety of subcellular locations  including treatment with the singlet oxygen producer Halo DBF and treatment with green light to activate Halo DBF. The extent of oxidation was then calculated at the gene level using PIGPEN software.", null, "pubmed:39605352;pubmed:40037712", null, "ZF NES GAPDH Rep2 minus", "GSM8578747", null, "source name:2 dpf embryos|tissue:2 dpf embryos|genotype:Halo NES|treatment:minus DBF|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing", "ZF NES GAPDH Rep2 minus", "OINC seq Oxidation Induced Nucleotide Conversion sequencing Adapters were trimmed from reads using Cutadapt. RNA oxidation events as seen as mutations were quantified using PIGPEN https://github.com/TaliaferroLab/OINC seq Assembly: hg38 and GRCz11 Supplementary files format and content: Quantification of mutations in RNAseq data produced by PIGPEN.", "2 dpf embryos", null, "RNA was extracted using Trizol and DNase treated for 30 min at 37C. Single amplicon libraries were constructed using gene specific RT PCR. Whole transcriptome libraries were created using Lexogen Quantseq library kits.", "HeLa cells were cultured in DMEM + pen/strep + 10% FBS. Zebrafish embryos were incubated at 28.5C in E3 medium.", "tissue:2 dpf embryos|genotype:Halo NES|treatment:minus DBF", "GSM8578747", "GSM8578747: ZF NES GAPDH Rep2 minus; Danio rerio; OTHER", "GSM8578747 r1", "GSM8578747", "1", "RNA was extracted using Trizol and DNase treated for 30 min at 37C. Single amplicon libraries were constructed using gene specific RT PCR. Whole transcriptome libraries were created using Lexogen Quantseq library kits.", null, "OTHER", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "Illumina NovaSeq 6000", null, "SRP539182", null, null, "ZF_NES_GAPDH_Rep2_minus.R1.fq.gz ZF_NES_GAPDH_Rep2_minus.R2.fq.gz", "fastq fastq", 1021837200.0, 3406124.0, "GSM8578747 r1", "0:150 1:150", "A:268290250;C:230525208;G:245949056;T:277056045;N:16641", 150, 150, null, null, 268290250, 230525208, 245949056, 277056045, 16641, "SRX26416594", "SRS22936447", "SRA1993027", "Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus", "Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus", null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, "B", "B", "biological fallback assumption", "illumina", "novaseq_era", "full_length", "random_priming", "lexogen", "bulk", "unknown", "unknown", null, "United States", "2024-10-17", "Hatching", "Embryo", "Embryo Imprecise", "All anatomical structures"], [33995, "SRR31030865", "SRX26416593", "SRS22936446", "SRP539182", "PRJNA1174121", "Quantification of subcellular RNA localization through direct detection of RNA oxidation", "GSE279714", "Other", "Across cell types and organisms  thousands of RNAs display asymmetric subcellular distributions. The study of this process often requires quantifying abundances of specific RNAs at precise subcellular locations. To analyze subcellular transcriptomes  multiple proximity based techniques have been developed in which RNAs near a localized bait protein are specifically labeled  facilitating their biotinylation and purification. However  these complex methods are often laborious and require expensive enrichment reagents. To streamline the analysis of localized RNA populations  we developed Oxidation Induced Nucleotide Conversion sequencing OINC seq. In OINC seq  RNAs near a genetically encoded  localized bait protein are specifically oxidized in a photo controllable manner. These oxidation events are then directly detected and quantified using high throughput sequencing and our software package  PIGPEN  without xxx need for biotin mediated enrichment. We demonstrate that OINC seq can induce and quantify RNA oxidation with high specificity in a dose  and light dependent manner. We further show the spatial specificity of OINC seq by using it to quantify subcellular transcriptomes associated with the cytoplasm  ER  and the inner and outer membranes of mitochondria. Finally  using transgenic zebrafish  we demonstrate that OINC seq allows proximity mediated RNA labeling in live animals. In sum  OINC seq together with PIGPEN provide an accessible workflow for the analysis of localized RNAs across different biological systems. Overall design: Cells and tissues were treated with and without xxx that drive localized RNA oxidation at a variety of subcellular locations  including treatment with the singlet oxygen producer Halo DBF and treatment with green light to activate Halo DBF. The extent of oxidation was then calculated at the gene level using PIGPEN software.", null, "pubmed:39605352;pubmed:40037712", null, "ZF NES GAPDH Rep1 plus", "GSM8578746", null, "source name:2 dpf embryos|tissue:2 dpf embryos|genotype:Halo NES|treatment:plus DBF|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing", "ZF NES GAPDH Rep1 plus", "OINC seq Oxidation Induced Nucleotide Conversion sequencing Adapters were trimmed from reads using Cutadapt. RNA oxidation events as seen as mutations were quantified using PIGPEN https://github.com/TaliaferroLab/OINC seq Assembly: hg38 and GRCz11 Supplementary files format and content: Quantification of mutations in RNAseq data produced by PIGPEN.", "2 dpf embryos", null, "RNA was extracted using Trizol and DNase treated for 30 min at 37C. Single amplicon libraries were constructed using gene specific RT PCR. Whole transcriptome libraries were created using Lexogen Quantseq library kits.", "HeLa cells were cultured in DMEM + pen/strep + 10% FBS. Zebrafish embryos were incubated at 28.5C in E3 medium.", "tissue:2 dpf embryos|genotype:Halo NES|treatment:plus DBF", "GSM8578746", "GSM8578746: ZF NES GAPDH Rep1 plus; Danio rerio; OTHER", "GSM8578746 r1", "GSM8578746", "1", "RNA was extracted using Trizol and DNase treated for 30 min at 37C. Single amplicon libraries were constructed using gene specific RT PCR. Whole transcriptome libraries were created using Lexogen Quantseq library kits.", null, "OTHER", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "Illumina NovaSeq 6000", null, "SRP539182", null, null, "ZF_NES_GAPDH_Rep1_plus.R1.fq.gz ZF_NES_GAPDH_Rep1_plus.R2.fq.gz", "fastq fastq", 1093620300.0, 3645401.0, "GSM8578746 r1", "0:150 1:150", "A:285989719;C:247805250;G:264181043;T:295625946;N:18342", 150, 150, null, null, 285989719, 247805250, 264181043, 295625946, 18342, "SRX26416593", "SRS22936446", "SRA1993027", "Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus", "Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus", null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, "B", "B", "biological fallback assumption", "illumina", "novaseq_era", "full_length", "random_priming", "lexogen", "bulk", "unknown", "unknown", null, "United States", "2024-10-17", "Hatching", "Embryo", "Embryo Imprecise", "All anatomical structures"], [33996, "SRR31030866", "SRX26416592", "SRS22936445", "SRP539182", "PRJNA1174121", "Quantification of subcellular RNA localization through direct detection of RNA oxidation", "GSE279714", "Other", "Across cell types and organisms  thousands of RNAs display asymmetric subcellular distributions. The study of this process often requires quantifying abundances of specific RNAs at precise subcellular locations. To analyze subcellular transcriptomes  multiple proximity based techniques have been developed in which RNAs near a localized bait protein are specifically labeled  facilitating their biotinylation and purification. However  these complex methods are often laborious and require expensive enrichment reagents. To streamline the analysis of localized RNA populations  we developed Oxidation Induced Nucleotide Conversion sequencing OINC seq. In OINC seq  RNAs near a genetically encoded  localized bait protein are specifically oxidized in a photo controllable manner. These oxidation events are then directly detected and quantified using high throughput sequencing and our software package  PIGPEN  without xxx need for biotin mediated enrichment. We demonstrate that OINC seq can induce and quantify RNA oxidation with high specificity in a dose  and light dependent manner. We further show the spatial specificity of OINC seq by using it to quantify subcellular transcriptomes associated with the cytoplasm  ER  and the inner and outer membranes of mitochondria. Finally  using transgenic zebrafish  we demonstrate that OINC seq allows proximity mediated RNA labeling in live animals. In sum  OINC seq together with PIGPEN provide an accessible workflow for the analysis of localized RNAs across different biological systems. Overall design: Cells and tissues were treated with and without xxx that drive localized RNA oxidation at a variety of subcellular locations  including treatment with the singlet oxygen producer Halo DBF and treatment with green light to activate Halo DBF. The extent of oxidation was then calculated at the gene level using PIGPEN software.", null, "pubmed:39605352;pubmed:40037712", null, "ZF NES GAPDH Rep1 minus", "GSM8578745", null, "source name:2 dpf embryos|tissue:2 dpf embryos|genotype:Halo NES|treatment:minus DBF|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing", "ZF NES GAPDH Rep1 minus", "OINC seq Oxidation Induced Nucleotide Conversion sequencing Adapters were trimmed from reads using Cutadapt. RNA oxidation events as seen as mutations were quantified using PIGPEN https://github.com/TaliaferroLab/OINC seq Assembly: hg38 and GRCz11 Supplementary files format and content: Quantification of mutations in RNAseq data produced by PIGPEN.", "2 dpf embryos", null, "RNA was extracted using Trizol and DNase treated for 30 min at 37C. Single amplicon libraries were constructed using gene specific RT PCR. Whole transcriptome libraries were created using Lexogen Quantseq library kits.", "HeLa cells were cultured in DMEM + pen/strep + 10% FBS. Zebrafish embryos were incubated at 28.5C in E3 medium.", "tissue:2 dpf embryos|genotype:Halo NES|treatment:minus DBF", "GSM8578745", "GSM8578745: ZF NES GAPDH Rep1 minus; Danio rerio; OTHER", "GSM8578745 r1", "GSM8578745", "1", "RNA was extracted using Trizol and DNase treated for 30 min at 37C. Single amplicon libraries were constructed using gene specific RT PCR. Whole transcriptome libraries were created using Lexogen Quantseq library kits.", null, "OTHER", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "Illumina NovaSeq 6000", null, "SRP539182", null, null, "ZF_NES_GAPDH_Rep1_minus.R1.fq.gz ZF_NES_GAPDH_Rep1_minus.R2.fq.gz", "fastq fastq", 911747100.0, 3039157.0, "GSM8578745 r1", "0:150 1:150", "A:239833349;C:205185786;G:218897710;T:247814511;N:15744", 150, 150, null, null, 239833349, 205185786, 218897710, 247814511, 15744, "SRX26416592", "SRS22936445", "SRA1993027", "Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus", "Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus", null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, "B", "B", "biological fallback assumption", "illumina", "novaseq_era", "full_length", "random_priming", "lexogen", "bulk", "unknown", "unknown", null, "United States", "2024-10-17", "Hatching", "Embryo", "Embryo Imprecise", "All anatomical structures"], [33997, "SRR31030867", "SRX26416591", "SRS22936444", "SRP539182", "PRJNA1174121", "Quantification of subcellular RNA localization through direct detection of RNA oxidation", "GSE279714", "Other", "Across cell types and organisms  thousands of RNAs display asymmetric subcellular distributions. The study of this process often requires quantifying abundances of specific RNAs at precise subcellular locations. To analyze subcellular transcriptomes  multiple proximity based techniques have been developed in which RNAs near a localized bait protein are specifically labeled  facilitating their biotinylation and purification. However  these complex methods are often laborious and require expensive enrichment reagents. To streamline the analysis of localized RNA populations  we developed Oxidation Induced Nucleotide Conversion sequencing OINC seq. In OINC seq  RNAs near a genetically encoded  localized bait protein are specifically oxidized in a photo controllable manner. These oxidation events are then directly detected and quantified using high throughput sequencing and our software package  PIGPEN  without xxx need for biotin mediated enrichment. We demonstrate that OINC seq can induce and quantify RNA oxidation with high specificity in a dose  and light dependent manner. We further show the spatial specificity of OINC seq by using it to quantify subcellular transcriptomes associated with the cytoplasm  ER  and the inner and outer membranes of mitochondria. Finally  using transgenic zebrafish  we demonstrate that OINC seq allows proximity mediated RNA labeling in live animals. In sum  OINC seq together with PIGPEN provide an accessible workflow for the analysis of localized RNAs across different biological systems. Overall design: Cells and tissues were treated with and without xxx that drive localized RNA oxidation at a variety of subcellular locations  including treatment with the singlet oxygen producer Halo DBF and treatment with green light to activate Halo DBF. The extent of oxidation was then calculated at the gene level using PIGPEN software.", null, "pubmed:39605352;pubmed:40037712", null, "ZF H2B MALAT1 Rep4 plus", "GSM8578744", null, "source name:2 dpf embryos|tissue:2 dpf embryos|genotype:Halo H2B|treatment:plus DBF|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing", "ZF H2B MALAT1 Rep4 plus", "OINC seq Oxidation Induced Nucleotide Conversion sequencing Adapters were trimmed from reads using Cutadapt. RNA oxidation events as seen as mutations were quantified using PIGPEN https://github.com/TaliaferroLab/OINC seq Assembly: hg38 and GRCz11 Supplementary files format and content: Quantification of mutations in RNAseq data produced by PIGPEN.", "2 dpf embryos", null, "RNA was extracted using Trizol and DNase treated for 30 min at 37C. Single amplicon libraries were constructed using gene specific RT PCR. Whole transcriptome libraries were created using Lexogen Quantseq library kits.", "HeLa cells were cultured in DMEM + pen/strep + 10% FBS. Zebrafish embryos were incubated at 28.5C in E3 medium.", "tissue:2 dpf embryos|genotype:Halo H2B|treatment:plus DBF", "GSM8578744", "GSM8578744: ZF H2B MALAT1 Rep4 plus; Danio rerio; OTHER", "GSM8578744 r1", "GSM8578744", "1", "RNA was extracted using Trizol and DNase treated for 30 min at 37C. Single amplicon libraries were constructed using gene specific RT PCR. Whole transcriptome libraries were created using Lexogen Quantseq library kits.", null, "OTHER", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "Illumina NovaSeq 6000", null, "SRP539182", null, null, "ZF_H2B_MALAT1_Rep4_plus.R1.fq.gz ZF_H2B_MALAT1_Rep4_plus.R2.fq.gz", "fastq fastq", 842103300.0, 2807011.0, "GSM8578744 r1", "0:150 1:150", "A:204870477;C:222752099;G:215404135;T:199062275;N:14314", 150, 150, null, null, 204870477, 222752099, 215404135, 199062275, 14314, "SRX26416591", "SRS22936444", "SRA1993027", "Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus", "Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus", null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, "B", "B", "biological fallback assumption", "illumina", "novaseq_era", "full_length", "random_priming", "lexogen", "bulk", "unknown", "unknown", null, "United States", "2024-10-17", "Hatching", "Embryo", "Embryo Imprecise", "All anatomical structures"], [33998, "SRR31030868", "SRX26416590", "SRS22936442", "SRP539182", "PRJNA1174121", "Quantification of subcellular RNA localization through direct detection of RNA oxidation", "GSE279714", "Other", "Across cell types and organisms  thousands of RNAs display asymmetric subcellular distributions. The study of this process often requires quantifying abundances of specific RNAs at precise subcellular locations. To analyze subcellular transcriptomes  multiple proximity based techniques have been developed in which RNAs near a localized bait protein are specifically labeled  facilitating their biotinylation and purification. However  these complex methods are often laborious and require expensive enrichment reagents. To streamline the analysis of localized RNA populations  we developed Oxidation Induced Nucleotide Conversion sequencing OINC seq. In OINC seq  RNAs near a genetically encoded  localized bait protein are specifically oxidized in a photo controllable manner. These oxidation events are then directly detected and quantified using high throughput sequencing and our software package  PIGPEN  without xxx need for biotin mediated enrichment. We demonstrate that OINC seq can induce and quantify RNA oxidation with high specificity in a dose  and light dependent manner. We further show the spatial specificity of OINC seq by using it to quantify subcellular transcriptomes associated with the cytoplasm  ER  and the inner and outer membranes of mitochondria. Finally  using transgenic zebrafish  we demonstrate that OINC seq allows proximity mediated RNA labeling in live animals. In sum  OINC seq together with PIGPEN provide an accessible workflow for the analysis of localized RNAs across different biological systems. Overall design: Cells and tissues were treated with and without xxx that drive localized RNA oxidation at a variety of subcellular locations  including treatment with the singlet oxygen producer Halo DBF and treatment with green light to activate Halo DBF. The extent of oxidation was then calculated at the gene level using PIGPEN software.", null, "pubmed:39605352;pubmed:40037712", null, "ZF H2B MALAT1 Rep4 minus", "GSM8578743", null, "source name:2 dpf embryos|tissue:2 dpf embryos|genotype:Halo H2B|treatment:minus DBF|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing", "ZF H2B MALAT1 Rep4 minus", "OINC seq Oxidation Induced Nucleotide Conversion sequencing Adapters were trimmed from reads using Cutadapt. RNA oxidation events as seen as mutations were quantified using PIGPEN https://github.com/TaliaferroLab/OINC seq Assembly: hg38 and GRCz11 Supplementary files format and content: Quantification of mutations in RNAseq data produced by PIGPEN.", "2 dpf embryos", null, "RNA was extracted using Trizol and DNase treated for 30 min at 37C. Single amplicon libraries were constructed using gene specific RT PCR. Whole transcriptome libraries were created using Lexogen Quantseq library kits.", "HeLa cells were cultured in DMEM + pen/strep + 10% FBS. Zebrafish embryos were incubated at 28.5C in E3 medium.", "tissue:2 dpf embryos|genotype:Halo H2B|treatment:minus DBF", "GSM8578743", "GSM8578743: ZF H2B MALAT1 Rep4 minus; Danio rerio; OTHER", "GSM8578743 r1", "GSM8578743", "1", "RNA was extracted using Trizol and DNase treated for 30 min at 37C. Single amplicon libraries were constructed using gene specific RT PCR. Whole transcriptome libraries were created using Lexogen Quantseq library kits.", null, "OTHER", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "Illumina NovaSeq 6000", null, "SRP539182", null, null, "ZF_H2B_MALAT1_Rep4_minus.R1.fq.gz ZF_H2B_MALAT1_Rep4_minus.R2.fq.gz", "fastq fastq", 1166375100.0, 3887917.0, "GSM8578743 r1", "0:150 1:150", "A:283781955;C:308660466;G:298298204;T:275614377;N:20098", 150, 150, null, null, 283781955, 308660466, 298298204, 275614377, 20098, "SRX26416590", "SRS22936442", "SRA1993027", "Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus", "Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus", null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, "B", "B", "biological fallback assumption", "illumina", "novaseq_era", "full_length", "random_priming", "lexogen", "bulk", "unknown", "unknown", null, "United States", "2024-10-17", "Hatching", "Embryo", "Embryo Imprecise", "All anatomical structures"], [33999, "SRR31030869", "SRX26416589", "SRS22936443", "SRP539182", "PRJNA1174121", "Quantification of subcellular RNA localization through direct detection of RNA oxidation", "GSE279714", "Other", "Across cell types and organisms  thousands of RNAs display asymmetric subcellular distributions. The study of this process often requires quantifying abundances of specific RNAs at precise subcellular locations. To analyze subcellular transcriptomes  multiple proximity based techniques have been developed in which RNAs near a localized bait protein are specifically labeled  facilitating their biotinylation and purification. However  these complex methods are often laborious and require expensive enrichment reagents. To streamline the analysis of localized RNA populations  we developed Oxidation Induced Nucleotide Conversion sequencing OINC seq. In OINC seq  RNAs near a genetically encoded  localized bait protein are specifically oxidized in a photo controllable manner. These oxidation events are then directly detected and quantified using high throughput sequencing and our software package  PIGPEN  without xxx need for biotin mediated enrichment. We demonstrate that OINC seq can induce and quantify RNA oxidation with high specificity in a dose  and light dependent manner. We further show the spatial specificity of OINC seq by using it to quantify subcellular transcriptomes associated with the cytoplasm  ER  and the inner and outer membranes of mitochondria. Finally  using transgenic zebrafish  we demonstrate that OINC seq allows proximity mediated RNA labeling in live animals. In sum  OINC seq together with PIGPEN provide an accessible workflow for the analysis of localized RNAs across different biological systems. Overall design: Cells and tissues were treated with and without xxx that drive localized RNA oxidation at a variety of subcellular locations  including treatment with the singlet oxygen producer Halo DBF and treatment with green light to activate Halo DBF. The extent of oxidation was then calculated at the gene level using PIGPEN software.", null, "pubmed:39605352;pubmed:40037712", null, "ZF H2B MALAT1 Rep3 plus", "GSM8578742", null, "source name:2 dpf embryos|tissue:2 dpf embryos|genotype:Halo H2B|treatment:plus DBF|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing", "ZF H2B MALAT1 Rep3 plus", "OINC seq Oxidation Induced Nucleotide Conversion sequencing Adapters were trimmed from reads using Cutadapt. RNA oxidation events as seen as mutations were quantified using PIGPEN https://github.com/TaliaferroLab/OINC seq Assembly: hg38 and GRCz11 Supplementary files format and content: Quantification of mutations in RNAseq data produced by PIGPEN.", "2 dpf embryos", null, "RNA was extracted using Trizol and DNase treated for 30 min at 37C. Single amplicon libraries were constructed using gene specific RT PCR. Whole transcriptome libraries were created using Lexogen Quantseq library kits.", "HeLa cells were cultured in DMEM + pen/strep + 10% FBS. Zebrafish embryos were incubated at 28.5C in E3 medium.", "tissue:2 dpf embryos|genotype:Halo H2B|treatment:plus DBF", "GSM8578742", "GSM8578742: ZF H2B MALAT1 Rep3 plus; Danio rerio; OTHER", "GSM8578742 r1", "GSM8578742", "1", "RNA was extracted using Trizol and DNase treated for 30 min at 37C. Single amplicon libraries were constructed using gene specific RT PCR. Whole transcriptome libraries were created using Lexogen Quantseq library kits.", null, "OTHER", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "Illumina NovaSeq 6000", null, "SRP539182", null, null, "ZF_H2B_MALAT1_Rep3_plus.R1.fq.gz ZF_H2B_MALAT1_Rep3_plus.R2.fq.gz", "fastq fastq", 1159439400.0, 3864798.0, "GSM8578742 r1", "0:150 1:150", "A:282055391;C:306842216;G:296569227;T:273952570;N:19996", 150, 150, null, null, 282055391, 306842216, 296569227, 273952570, 19996, "SRX26416589", "SRS22936443", "SRA1993027", "Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus", "Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus", null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, "B", "B", "biological fallback assumption", "illumina", "novaseq_era", "full_length", "random_priming", "lexogen", "bulk", "unknown", "unknown", null, "United States", "2024-10-17", "Hatching", "Embryo", "Embryo Imprecise", "All anatomical structures"], [34000, "SRR31030870", "SRX26416588", "SRS22936440", "SRP539182", "PRJNA1174121", "Quantification of subcellular RNA localization through direct detection of RNA oxidation", "GSE279714", "Other", "Across cell types and organisms  thousands of RNAs display asymmetric subcellular distributions. The study of this process often requires quantifying abundances of specific RNAs at precise subcellular locations. To analyze subcellular transcriptomes  multiple proximity based techniques have been developed in which RNAs near a localized bait protein are specifically labeled  facilitating their biotinylation and purification. However  these complex methods are often laborious and require expensive enrichment reagents. To streamline the analysis of localized RNA populations  we developed Oxidation Induced Nucleotide Conversion sequencing OINC seq. In OINC seq  RNAs near a genetically encoded  localized bait protein are specifically oxidized in a photo controllable manner. These oxidation events are then directly detected and quantified using high throughput sequencing and our software package  PIGPEN  without xxx need for biotin mediated enrichment. We demonstrate that OINC seq can induce and quantify RNA oxidation with high specificity in a dose  and light dependent manner. We further show the spatial specificity of OINC seq by using it to quantify subcellular transcriptomes associated with the cytoplasm  ER  and the inner and outer membranes of mitochondria. Finally  using transgenic zebrafish  we demonstrate that OINC seq allows proximity mediated RNA labeling in live animals. In sum  OINC seq together with PIGPEN provide an accessible workflow for the analysis of localized RNAs across different biological systems. Overall design: Cells and tissues were treated with and without xxx that drive localized RNA oxidation at a variety of subcellular locations  including treatment with the singlet oxygen producer Halo DBF and treatment with green light to activate Halo DBF. The extent of oxidation was then calculated at the gene level using PIGPEN software.", null, "pubmed:39605352;pubmed:40037712", null, "ZF H2B MALAT1 Rep3 minus", "GSM8578741", null, "source name:2 dpf embryos|tissue:2 dpf embryos|genotype:Halo H2B|treatment:minus DBF|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing", "ZF H2B MALAT1 Rep3 minus", "OINC seq Oxidation Induced Nucleotide Conversion sequencing Adapters were trimmed from reads using Cutadapt. RNA oxidation events as seen as mutations were quantified using PIGPEN https://github.com/TaliaferroLab/OINC seq Assembly: hg38 and GRCz11 Supplementary files format and content: Quantification of mutations in RNAseq data produced by PIGPEN.", "2 dpf embryos", null, "RNA was extracted using Trizol and DNase treated for 30 min at 37C. Single amplicon libraries were constructed using gene specific RT PCR. Whole transcriptome libraries were created using Lexogen Quantseq library kits.", "HeLa cells were cultured in DMEM + pen/strep + 10% FBS. Zebrafish embryos were incubated at 28.5C in E3 medium.", "tissue:2 dpf embryos|genotype:Halo H2B|treatment:minus DBF", "GSM8578741", "GSM8578741: ZF H2B MALAT1 Rep3 minus; Danio rerio; OTHER", "GSM8578741 r1", "GSM8578741", "1", "RNA was extracted using Trizol and DNase treated for 30 min at 37C. Single amplicon libraries were constructed using gene specific RT PCR. Whole transcriptome libraries were created using Lexogen Quantseq library kits.", null, "OTHER", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "Illumina NovaSeq 6000", null, "SRP539182", null, null, "ZF_H2B_MALAT1_Rep3_minus.R1.fq.gz ZF_H2B_MALAT1_Rep3_minus.R2.fq.gz", "fastq fastq", 1008297600.0, 3360992.0, "GSM8578741 r1", "0:150 1:150", "A:245277585;C:266840408;G:257911846;T:238251305;N:16456", 150, 150, null, null, 245277585, 266840408, 257911846, 238251305, 16456, "SRX26416588", "SRS22936440", "SRA1993027", "Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus", "Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus", null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, "B", "B", "biological fallback assumption", "illumina", "novaseq_era", "full_length", "random_priming", "lexogen", "bulk", "unknown", "unknown", null, "United States", "2024-10-17", "Hatching", "Embryo", "Embryo Imprecise", "All anatomical structures"], [34001, "SRR31030871", "SRX26416587", "SRS22936441", "SRP539182", "PRJNA1174121", "Quantification of subcellular RNA localization through direct detection of RNA oxidation", "GSE279714", "Other", "Across cell types and organisms  thousands of RNAs display asymmetric subcellular distributions. The study of this process often requires quantifying abundances of specific RNAs at precise subcellular locations. To analyze subcellular transcriptomes  multiple proximity based techniques have been developed in which RNAs near a localized bait protein are specifically labeled  facilitating their biotinylation and purification. However  these complex methods are often laborious and require expensive enrichment reagents. To streamline the analysis of localized RNA populations  we developed Oxidation Induced Nucleotide Conversion sequencing OINC seq. In OINC seq  RNAs near a genetically encoded  localized bait protein are specifically oxidized in a photo controllable manner. These oxidation events are then directly detected and quantified using high throughput sequencing and our software package  PIGPEN  without xxx need for biotin mediated enrichment. We demonstrate that OINC seq can induce and quantify RNA oxidation with high specificity in a dose  and light dependent manner. We further show the spatial specificity of OINC seq by using it to quantify subcellular transcriptomes associated with the cytoplasm  ER  and the inner and outer membranes of mitochondria. Finally  using transgenic zebrafish  we demonstrate that OINC seq allows proximity mediated RNA labeling in live animals. In sum  OINC seq together with PIGPEN provide an accessible workflow for the analysis of localized RNAs across different biological systems. Overall design: Cells and tissues were treated with and without xxx that drive localized RNA oxidation at a variety of subcellular locations  including treatment with the singlet oxygen producer Halo DBF and treatment with green light to activate Halo DBF. The extent of oxidation was then calculated at the gene level using PIGPEN software.", null, "pubmed:39605352;pubmed:40037712", null, "ZF H2B MALAT1 Rep2 plus", "GSM8578740", null, "source name:2 dpf embryos|tissue:2 dpf embryos|genotype:Halo H2B|treatment:plus DBF|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing", "ZF H2B MALAT1 Rep2 plus", "OINC seq Oxidation Induced Nucleotide Conversion sequencing Adapters were trimmed from reads using Cutadapt. RNA oxidation events as seen as mutations were quantified using PIGPEN https://github.com/TaliaferroLab/OINC seq Assembly: hg38 and GRCz11 Supplementary files format and content: Quantification of mutations in RNAseq data produced by PIGPEN.", "2 dpf embryos", null, "RNA was extracted using Trizol and DNase treated for 30 min at 37C. Single amplicon libraries were constructed using gene specific RT PCR. Whole transcriptome libraries were created using Lexogen Quantseq library kits.", "HeLa cells were cultured in DMEM + pen/strep + 10% FBS. Zebrafish embryos were incubated at 28.5C in E3 medium.", "tissue:2 dpf embryos|genotype:Halo H2B|treatment:plus DBF", "GSM8578740", "GSM8578740: ZF H2B MALAT1 Rep2 plus; Danio rerio; OTHER", "GSM8578740 r1", "GSM8578740", "1", "RNA was extracted using Trizol and DNase treated for 30 min at 37C. Single amplicon libraries were constructed using gene specific RT PCR. Whole transcriptome libraries were created using Lexogen Quantseq library kits.", null, "OTHER", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "Illumina NovaSeq 6000", null, "SRP539182", null, null, "ZF_H2B_MALAT1_Rep2_plus.R1.fq.gz ZF_H2B_MALAT1_Rep2_plus.R2.fq.gz", "fastq fastq", 1419263400.0, 4730878.0, "GSM8578740 r1", "0:150 1:150", "A:345302268;C:375591885;G:362956395;T:335387828;N:25024", 150, 150, null, null, 345302268, 375591885, 362956395, 335387828, 25024, "SRX26416587", "SRS22936441", "SRA1993027", "Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus", "Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus", null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, "B", "B", "biological fallback assumption", "illumina", "novaseq_era", "full_length", "random_priming", "lexogen", "bulk", "unknown", "unknown", null, "United States", "2024-10-17", "Hatching", "Embryo", "Embryo Imprecise", "All anatomical structures"], [34002, "SRR31030872", "SRX26416586", "SRS22936439", "SRP539182", "PRJNA1174121", "Quantification of subcellular RNA localization through direct detection of RNA oxidation", "GSE279714", "Other", "Across cell types and organisms  thousands of RNAs display asymmetric subcellular distributions. The study of this process often requires quantifying abundances of specific RNAs at precise subcellular locations. To analyze subcellular transcriptomes  multiple proximity based techniques have been developed in which RNAs near a localized bait protein are specifically labeled  facilitating their biotinylation and purification. However  these complex methods are often laborious and require expensive enrichment reagents. To streamline the analysis of localized RNA populations  we developed Oxidation Induced Nucleotide Conversion sequencing OINC seq. In OINC seq  RNAs near a genetically encoded  localized bait protein are specifically oxidized in a photo controllable manner. These oxidation events are then directly detected and quantified using high throughput sequencing and our software package  PIGPEN  without xxx need for biotin mediated enrichment. We demonstrate that OINC seq can induce and quantify RNA oxidation with high specificity in a dose  and light dependent manner. We further show the spatial specificity of OINC seq by using it to quantify subcellular transcriptomes associated with the cytoplasm  ER  and the inner and outer membranes of mitochondria. Finally  using transgenic zebrafish  we demonstrate that OINC seq allows proximity mediated RNA labeling in live animals. In sum  OINC seq together with PIGPEN provide an accessible workflow for the analysis of localized RNAs across different biological systems. Overall design: Cells and tissues were treated with and without xxx that drive localized RNA oxidation at a variety of subcellular locations  including treatment with the singlet oxygen producer Halo DBF and treatment with green light to activate Halo DBF. The extent of oxidation was then calculated at the gene level using PIGPEN software.", null, "pubmed:39605352;pubmed:40037712", null, "ZF H2B MALAT1 Rep2 minus", "GSM8578739", null, "source name:2 dpf embryos|tissue:2 dpf embryos|genotype:Halo H2B|treatment:minus DBF|geo loc name:missing|collection date:missing", "ZF H2B MALAT1 Rep2 minus", "OINC seq Oxidation Induced Nucleotide Conversion sequencing Adapters were trimmed from reads using Cutadapt. RNA oxidation events as seen as mutations were quantified using PIGPEN https://github.com/TaliaferroLab/OINC seq Assembly: hg38 and GRCz11 Supplementary files format and content: Quantification of mutations in RNAseq data produced by PIGPEN.", "2 dpf embryos", null, "RNA was extracted using Trizol and DNase treated for 30 min at 37C. Single amplicon libraries were constructed using gene specific RT PCR. Whole transcriptome libraries were created using Lexogen Quantseq library kits.", "HeLa cells were cultured in DMEM + pen/strep + 10% FBS. Zebrafish embryos were incubated at 28.5C in E3 medium.", "tissue:2 dpf embryos|genotype:Halo H2B|treatment:minus DBF", "GSM8578739", "GSM8578739: ZF H2B MALAT1 Rep2 minus; Danio rerio; OTHER", "GSM8578739 r1", "GSM8578739", "1", "RNA was extracted using Trizol and DNase treated for 30 min at 37C. Single amplicon libraries were constructed using gene specific RT PCR. Whole transcriptome libraries were created using Lexogen Quantseq library kits.", null, "OTHER", "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "other", "PAIRED", "ILLUMINA", "Illumina NovaSeq 6000", null, "SRP539182", null, null, "ZF_H2B_MALAT1_Rep2_minus.R1.fq.gz ZF_H2B_MALAT1_Rep2_minus.R2.fq.gz", "fastq fastq", 1249910700.0, 4166369.0, "GSM8578739 r1", "0:150 1:150", "A:304074828;C:330741431;G:319677748;T:295395235;N:21458", 150, 150, null, null, 304074828, 330741431, 319677748, 295395235, 21458, "SRX26416586", "SRS22936439", "SRA1993027", "Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus", "Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus", null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, "B", "B", "biological fallback assumption", "illumina", "novaseq_era", "full_length", "random_priming", "lexogen", "bulk", "unknown", "unknown", null, "United States", "2024-10-17", "Hatching", "Embryo", "Embryo Imprecise", "All anatomical structures"]], "truncated": false, "filtered_table_rows_count": 294, "expanded_columns": [], "expandable_columns": [], "columns": ["rowid", "run.accession", "experiment.accession", "sample.accession", "study.accession", "bioproject", "study.title", "study.alias", "study.type", "study.abstract", "study.attributes", "study.PMIDs", "sample.description", "sample.title", "sample.alias", "sample.centername", "sample.attributes", "GEOsample.title", "GEOsample.dataprocessing", "GEOsample.source", "GEOsample.treatmentprotocol", "GEOsample.extractprotocol", "GEOsample.growthprotocol", "GEOsample.characteristics", "GEOsample.accession", "experiment.title", "experiment.alias", "experiment.library_name", "experiment.design_description", "experiment.library_construction_protocol", "experiment.attributes", "experiment.library_strategy", "experiment.library_source", "experiment.library_selection", "experiment.library_layout", "experiment.platform", "experiment.instrument_model", "experiment.spot_descriptor", "experiment.study_ref", "run.title", "run.attributes", "run.filename", "run.semantic_name", "run.total_bases", "run.total_spots", "run.alias", "run.read_lengths", "run.base_counts", "run.r1_length", "run.r2_length", "run.r3_length", "run.r4_length", "run.Acount", "run.Ccount", "run.Gcount", "run.Tcount", "run.Ncount", "run.experiment", "run.pool_member", "submission.accession", "submission.srasource", "submission.bioprojectsource", "seqdetective.n_mates", "seqdetective.mapping_rate.mate1", "seqdetective.mapping_rate.mate2", "seqdetective.nofeature_rate.mate1", "seqdetective.nofeature_rate.mate2", "seqdetective.sparsity.mate1", "seqdetective.sparsity.mate2", "seqdetective.pos_strand_rate.mate1", "seqdetective.pos_strand_rate.mate2", "seqdetective.readlen.mate1", "seqdetective.readlen.mate2", "seqdetective.judgement.mate1", "seqdetective.judgement.mate2", "seqdetective.judgement.reason", "platform_family", "instrument_generation", "read_bias", "selection_class", "prep_kit", "sc_or_bulk", "tech_class", "technology", "tech_variant", "submission.bioprojectsource.country", "earliest_date", "devstage_curation", "devstage_curation_coarse", "tissue_curation", "tissue_curation_coarse"], "primary_keys": [], "units": {}, "query": {"sql": "select rowid, [run.accession], [experiment.accession], [sample.accession], [study.accession], bioproject, [study.title], [study.alias], [study.type], [study.abstract], [study.attributes], [study.PMIDs], [sample.description], [sample.title], [sample.alias], [sample.centername], [sample.attributes], [GEOsample.title], [GEOsample.dataprocessing], [GEOsample.source], [GEOsample.treatmentprotocol], [GEOsample.extractprotocol], [GEOsample.growthprotocol], [GEOsample.characteristics], [GEOsample.accession], [experiment.title], [experiment.alias], [experiment.library_name], [experiment.design_description], [experiment.library_construction_protocol], [experiment.attributes], [experiment.library_strategy], [experiment.library_source], [experiment.library_selection], [experiment.library_layout], [experiment.platform], [experiment.instrument_model], [experiment.spot_descriptor], [experiment.study_ref], [run.title], [run.attributes], [run.filename], [run.semantic_name], [run.total_bases], [run.total_spots], [run.alias], [run.read_lengths], [run.base_counts], [run.r1_length], [run.r2_length], [run.r3_length], [run.r4_length], [run.Acount], [run.Ccount], [run.Gcount], [run.Tcount], [run.Ncount], [run.experiment], [run.pool_member], [submission.accession], [submission.srasource], [submission.bioprojectsource], [seqdetective.n_mates], [seqdetective.mapping_rate.mate1], [seqdetective.mapping_rate.mate2], [seqdetective.nofeature_rate.mate1], [seqdetective.nofeature_rate.mate2], [seqdetective.sparsity.mate1], [seqdetective.sparsity.mate2], [seqdetective.pos_strand_rate.mate1], [seqdetective.pos_strand_rate.mate2], [seqdetective.readlen.mate1], [seqdetective.readlen.mate2], [seqdetective.judgement.mate1], [seqdetective.judgement.mate2], [seqdetective.judgement.reason], platform_family, instrument_generation, read_bias, selection_class, prep_kit, sc_or_bulk, tech_class, technology, tech_variant, [submission.bioprojectsource.country], earliest_date, devstage_curation, devstage_curation_coarse, tissue_curation, tissue_curation_coarse from run_metadata where \"experiment.library_layout\" = :p0 and \"experiment.library_selection\" = :p1 and \"tissue_curation_coarse\" = :p2 order by rowid limit 101", "params": {"p0": "PAIRED", "p1": "other", "p2": "All anatomical structures"}}, "facet_results": {"experiment.library_strategy": {"name": "experiment.library_strategy", "type": "column", "hideable": false, "toggle_url": "/metadata/run_metadata.json?experiment.library_layout=PAIRED&experiment.library_selection=other&tissue_curation_coarse=All+anatomical+structures", "results": [{"value": "OTHER", "label": "OTHER", "count": 168, "toggle_url": "http://metadata.rnaquarium.org/metadata/run_metadata.json?experiment.library_layout=PAIRED&experiment.library_selection=other&tissue_curation_coarse=All+anatomical+structures&experiment.library_strategy=OTHER", "selected": false}, {"value": "RIP-Seq", "label": "RIP-Seq", "count": 70, "toggle_url": "http://metadata.rnaquarium.org/metadata/run_metadata.json?experiment.library_layout=PAIRED&experiment.library_selection=other&tissue_curation_coarse=All+anatomical+structures&experiment.library_strategy=RIP-Seq", "selected": false}, {"value": "RNA-Seq", "label": "RNA-Seq", "count": 54, "toggle_url": "http://metadata.rnaquarium.org/metadata/run_metadata.json?experiment.library_layout=PAIRED&experiment.library_selection=other&tissue_curation_coarse=All+anatomical+structures&experiment.library_strategy=RNA-Seq", "selected": false}, {"value": "ATAC-seq", "label": "ATAC-seq", "count": 2, "toggle_url": "http://metadata.rnaquarium.org/metadata/run_metadata.json?experiment.library_layout=PAIRED&experiment.library_selection=other&tissue_curation_coarse=All+anatomical+structures&experiment.library_strategy=ATAC-seq", "selected": false}], "truncated": false}, "experiment.library_source": {"name": "experiment.library_source", "type": "column", "hideable": false, "toggle_url": "/metadata/run_metadata.json?experiment.library_layout=PAIRED&experiment.library_selection=other&tissue_curation_coarse=All+anatomical+structures", "results": [{"value": "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "label": "TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "count": 293, "toggle_url": "http://metadata.rnaquarium.org/metadata/run_metadata.json?experiment.library_layout=PAIRED&experiment.library_selection=other&tissue_curation_coarse=All+anatomical+structures&experiment.library_source=TRANSCRIPTOMIC", "selected": false}, {"value": "TRANSCRIPTOMIC SINGLE CELL", "label": "TRANSCRIPTOMIC SINGLE CELL", "count": 1, "toggle_url": "http://metadata.rnaquarium.org/metadata/run_metadata.json?experiment.library_layout=PAIRED&experiment.library_selection=other&tissue_curation_coarse=All+anatomical+structures&experiment.library_source=TRANSCRIPTOMIC+SINGLE+CELL", "selected": false}], "truncated": false}, "experiment.library_selection": {"name": "experiment.library_selection", "type": "column", "hideable": false, "toggle_url": "/metadata/run_metadata.json?experiment.library_layout=PAIRED&experiment.library_selection=other&tissue_curation_coarse=All+anatomical+structures", "results": [{"value": "other", "label": "other", "count": 294, "toggle_url": "http://metadata.rnaquarium.org/metadata/run_metadata.json?experiment.library_layout=PAIRED&tissue_curation_coarse=All+anatomical+structures", "selected": true}], "truncated": false}, "experiment.library_layout": {"name": "experiment.library_layout", "type": "column", "hideable": false, "toggle_url": "/metadata/run_metadata.json?experiment.library_layout=PAIRED&experiment.library_selection=other&tissue_curation_coarse=All+anatomical+structures", "results": [{"value": "PAIRED", "label": "PAIRED", "count": 294, "toggle_url": "http://metadata.rnaquarium.org/metadata/run_metadata.json?experiment.library_selection=other&tissue_curation_coarse=All+anatomical+structures", "selected": true}], "truncated": false}, "experiment.platform": {"name": "experiment.platform", "type": "column", "hideable": false, "toggle_url": "/metadata/run_metadata.json?experiment.library_layout=PAIRED&experiment.library_selection=other&tissue_curation_coarse=All+anatomical+structures", "results": [{"value": "ILLUMINA", "label": "ILLUMINA", "count": 294, "toggle_url": "http://metadata.rnaquarium.org/metadata/run_metadata.json?experiment.library_layout=PAIRED&experiment.library_selection=other&tissue_curation_coarse=All+anatomical+structures&experiment.platform=ILLUMINA", "selected": false}], "truncated": false}, "devstage_curation_coarse": {"name": "devstage_curation_coarse", "type": "column", "hideable": false, "toggle_url": "/metadata/run_metadata.json?experiment.library_layout=PAIRED&experiment.library_selection=other&tissue_curation_coarse=All+anatomical+structures", "results": [{"value": "Embryo", "label": "Embryo", "count": 212, "toggle_url": "http://metadata.rnaquarium.org/metadata/run_metadata.json?experiment.library_layout=PAIRED&experiment.library_selection=other&tissue_curation_coarse=All+anatomical+structures&devstage_curation_coarse=Embryo", "selected": false}, {"value": "Larval", "label": "Larval", "count": 69, "toggle_url": "http://metadata.rnaquarium.org/metadata/run_metadata.json?experiment.library_layout=PAIRED&experiment.library_selection=other&tissue_curation_coarse=All+anatomical+structures&devstage_curation_coarse=Larval", "selected": false}, {"value": "Multi-stage", "label": "Multi-stage", "count": 12, "toggle_url": "http://metadata.rnaquarium.org/metadata/run_metadata.json?experiment.library_layout=PAIRED&experiment.library_selection=other&tissue_curation_coarse=All+anatomical+structures&devstage_curation_coarse=Multi-stage", "selected": false}, {"value": "Adult", "label": "Adult", "count": 1, "toggle_url": "http://metadata.rnaquarium.org/metadata/run_metadata.json?experiment.library_layout=PAIRED&experiment.library_selection=other&tissue_curation_coarse=All+anatomical+structures&devstage_curation_coarse=Adult", "selected": false}], "truncated": false}, "devstage_curation": {"name": "devstage_curation", "type": "column", "hideable": false, "toggle_url": "/metadata/run_metadata.json?experiment.library_layout=PAIRED&experiment.library_selection=other&tissue_curation_coarse=All+anatomical+structures", "results": [{"value": "Multi-stage", "label": "Multi-stage", "count": 82, "toggle_url": "http://metadata.rnaquarium.org/metadata/run_metadata.json?experiment.library_layout=PAIRED&experiment.library_selection=other&tissue_curation_coarse=All+anatomical+structures&devstage_curation=Multi-stage", "selected": false}, {"value": "Larval", "label": "Larval", "count": 69, "toggle_url": "http://metadata.rnaquarium.org/metadata/run_metadata.json?experiment.library_layout=PAIRED&experiment.library_selection=other&tissue_curation_coarse=All+anatomical+structures&devstage_curation=Larval", "selected": false}, {"value": "Hatching", "label": "Hatching", "count": 43, "toggle_url": "http://metadata.rnaquarium.org/metadata/run_metadata.json?experiment.library_layout=PAIRED&experiment.library_selection=other&tissue_curation_coarse=All+anatomical+structures&devstage_curation=Hatching", "selected": false}, {"value": "Blastula", "label": "Blastula", "count": 25, "toggle_url": "http://metadata.rnaquarium.org/metadata/run_metadata.json?experiment.library_layout=PAIRED&experiment.library_selection=other&tissue_curation_coarse=All+anatomical+structures&devstage_curation=Blastula", "selected": false}, {"value": "Cleavage", "label": "Cleavage", "count": 25, "toggle_url": "http://metadata.rnaquarium.org/metadata/run_metadata.json?experiment.library_layout=PAIRED&experiment.library_selection=other&tissue_curation_coarse=All+anatomical+structures&devstage_curation=Cleavage", "selected": false}, {"value": "Gastrula", "label": "Gastrula", "count": 15, "toggle_url": "http://metadata.rnaquarium.org/metadata/run_metadata.json?experiment.library_layout=PAIRED&experiment.library_selection=other&tissue_curation_coarse=All+anatomical+structures&devstage_curation=Gastrula", "selected": false}, {"value": "Undetermined", "label": "Undetermined", "count": 14, "toggle_url": "http://metadata.rnaquarium.org/metadata/run_metadata.json?experiment.library_layout=PAIRED&experiment.library_selection=other&tissue_curation_coarse=All+anatomical+structures&devstage_curation=Undetermined", "selected": false}, {"value": "Zygote", "label": "Zygote", "count": 11, "toggle_url": "http://metadata.rnaquarium.org/metadata/run_metadata.json?experiment.library_layout=PAIRED&experiment.library_selection=other&tissue_curation_coarse=All+anatomical+structures&devstage_curation=Zygote", "selected": false}, {"value": "Pharyngula", "label": "Pharyngula", "count": 6, "toggle_url": "http://metadata.rnaquarium.org/metadata/run_metadata.json?experiment.library_layout=PAIRED&experiment.library_selection=other&tissue_curation_coarse=All+anatomical+structures&devstage_curation=Pharyngula", "selected": false}, {"value": "Segmentation", "label": "Segmentation", "count": 3, "toggle_url": "http://metadata.rnaquarium.org/metadata/run_metadata.json?experiment.library_layout=PAIRED&experiment.library_selection=other&tissue_curation_coarse=All+anatomical+structures&devstage_curation=Segmentation", "selected": false}], "truncated": true}, "tissue_curation_coarse": {"name": "tissue_curation_coarse", "type": "column", "hideable": false, "toggle_url": "/metadata/run_metadata.json?experiment.library_layout=PAIRED&experiment.library_selection=other&tissue_curation_coarse=All+anatomical+structures", "results": [{"value": "All anatomical structures", "label": "All anatomical structures", "count": 294, "toggle_url": "http://metadata.rnaquarium.org/metadata/run_metadata.json?experiment.library_layout=PAIRED&experiment.library_selection=other", "selected": true}], "truncated": false}, "tissue_curation": {"name": "tissue_curation", "type": "column", "hideable": false, "toggle_url": "/metadata/run_metadata.json?experiment.library_layout=PAIRED&experiment.library_selection=other&tissue_curation_coarse=All+anatomical+structures", "results": [{"value": "Whole Organism", "label": "Whole Organism", "count": 170, "toggle_url": "http://metadata.rnaquarium.org/metadata/run_metadata.json?experiment.library_layout=PAIRED&experiment.library_selection=other&tissue_curation_coarse=All+anatomical+structures&tissue_curation=Whole+Organism", "selected": false}, {"value": "Embryo Imprecise", "label": "Embryo Imprecise", "count": 124, "toggle_url": "http://metadata.rnaquarium.org/metadata/run_metadata.json?experiment.library_layout=PAIRED&experiment.library_selection=other&tissue_curation_coarse=All+anatomical+structures&tissue_curation=Embryo+Imprecise", "selected": false}], "truncated": false}, "technology": {"name": "technology", "type": "column", "hideable": false, "toggle_url": "/metadata/run_metadata.json?experiment.library_layout=PAIRED&experiment.library_selection=other&tissue_curation_coarse=All+anatomical+structures", "results": [{"value": "unknown", "label": "unknown", "count": 194, "toggle_url": "http://metadata.rnaquarium.org/metadata/run_metadata.json?experiment.library_layout=PAIRED&experiment.library_selection=other&tissue_curation_coarse=All+anatomical+structures&technology=unknown", "selected": false}, {"value": "indrops", "label": "indrops", "count": 56, "toggle_url": "http://metadata.rnaquarium.org/metadata/run_metadata.json?experiment.library_layout=PAIRED&experiment.library_selection=other&tissue_curation_coarse=All+anatomical+structures&technology=indrops", "selected": false}, {"value": "bulk", "label": "bulk", "count": 22, "toggle_url": "http://metadata.rnaquarium.org/metadata/run_metadata.json?experiment.library_layout=PAIRED&experiment.library_selection=other&tissue_curation_coarse=All+anatomical+structures&technology=bulk", "selected": false}, {"value": "iclip", "label": "iclip", "count": 18, "toggle_url": "http://metadata.rnaquarium.org/metadata/run_metadata.json?experiment.library_layout=PAIRED&experiment.library_selection=other&tissue_curation_coarse=All+anatomical+structures&technology=iclip", "selected": false}, {"value": "10x", "label": "10x", "count": 4, "toggle_url": "http://metadata.rnaquarium.org/metadata/run_metadata.json?experiment.library_layout=PAIRED&experiment.library_selection=other&tissue_curation_coarse=All+anatomical+structures&technology=10x", "selected": false}], "truncated": false}}, "suggested_facets": [], "next": "34002", "next_url": "http://metadata.rnaquarium.org/metadata/run_metadata.json?experiment.library_layout=PAIRED&experiment.library_selection=other&tissue_curation_coarse=All+anatomical+structures&_next=34002", "private": false, "allow_execute_sql": true, "query_ms": 104.43411400046898}